Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
and
hile energy consumption and atmospheric carbon emissions from most building-related services
are falling, in the United Kingdom those associated with air conditioning (A/C) are growing as
more buildings become air conditioned1 due to increasing occupant expectations of thermal comfort.2
Future projections of UK market trends suggest increased use of A/C will continue, resulting in increased
national energy demand and its associated carbon emissions.3 This growth in carbon emissions conicts
with national commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto Protocol and the UK
governments additional goal to reduce emissions by 60% before 2050.4
In a consumer-led, knowledge-based
economy, a conict exists between the
desire to restrict the use of air conditioning to reduce environmental impact and
the market demand for air conditioning
on the grounds of enhanced productivity. In practice, to resolve this conict
we must explore new ways to reduce
energy use and emissions resulting
from air conditioning. The way forward
26
ASHRAE Journal
February 2005
Research Overview
February 2005
27
60
UK Location
South East
South East
South East
3
4
South Wales
System Description
Percent of Time
Site
40
20
15
25
35
45
55
65
Percent of Full Load
75
85
95
85
95
85
95
85
95
Mean
Winter
Spring/Fall
Summer
24%
10%
N/A
38%
System 2: 1,275 kW
94%
Screw Chiller & Fan Coil
97%
91%
95%
System 3: 100 kW
Packaged Chiller &
Fan Coil
72%
70%
71%
75%
System 4: 7.9kW
DX Split
14%
21%
2%
18%
System 1: 50 kW
Packaged Chiller
& Fan Coil
Percent of Time
40
20
0
5
25
35
21%
19%
8.3%
44%
Percent of Time
Percentage of Full-Load
40
20
0
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
Percent of Full Load
75
40
20
0
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
Percent of Full Load
75
ASHRAE Journal
75
60
28
45
55
65
Percent of Full Load
System
15
ashrae.org
February 2005
Refrigeration
And Heat Rejection
Distribution
Pumps
Fan Coils
And Reheat
kWh/m2
Econ 19
Benchmark
41%
8%
51%
105*
40%
44%
16%
148
38%
6%
52%
57.7
100%
N/A
N/A
44.5
1% Above
Good Practice
Notes: Control loads are included with their respective subsystems; * Includes heating energy consumption
Rated Chiller
Efciency*
Daily Refrigeration
Efciency
Daily System
Efciency
Avg. System
Load
Typical System
Efciency
EER
CER
CER
CER
% Full Load
CER
System 1: 50 kW
Packaged Chiller
And Fan Coil
2.48
2.0 4.5
0.5 2.0
1.6
21%
1.0 1.4
System 2: 1,275 kW
Screw Chiller
And Fan Coil
4.46
3.2 5.3
1.1 2.0
1.7
19%
0.8 1.6
System 3: 100 kW
Packaged Chiller
And Fan Coil
2.66
2.1 3.3
0.4 1.7
1.4
8.3%
0.3 1.4
System 4: 7.9 kW
DX Split
2.42
N/A
1.2 5.5
3.4
44%
1.3 1.7
* Test conditions for water-cooled and air-cooled chillers are different so the rated efciencies are not directly comparable.
February 2005
ASHRAE Journal
29
Typical
Seasonal
Seasonal
System CER System COP System COP
All-Air Systems
Constant Volume (CV)
Variable Air Volume (VAV)
0.44
0.76
0.81 to 0.91
1.19
0.87
Dual Duct
0.27 to 0.38
Air-Water Systems
Air-Water Fan Coil (Four-pipe)
Air-Water Fan Coil
(Two-pipe w/Reheat)
0.82 to 0.96
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0
10
1.16
0.55 to 0.75
Chilled Ceiling
(With Disp. Ventilation)
1.37 to 1.51
Chilled Beams
(With Disp. Ventilation)
1.07 to 1.27
1.14 to 1.21
1.3 to 1.7
1.15
1.95
1.05
0.88
1.36
ASHRAE Journal
14
16
18
20
22
Avg. Daily External Temperature (C)
24
5.0
12
Figure 5: Chiller heat pump and fan coil system. Daily CER vs.
external temperature (operational periods only).
30
5.0
0.3 to 1.6
Air-Water Induction
Single DX Split
6.0
Cooling Efciency Ratio
Field
TAS
DOE2
Measurement Simulations Simulations
Source of Estimate
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0
20
40
60
80
System Load (Percent Full Load)
100
Figure 6: Site 1chiller heat pump and fan coil system. System
cooling efciency vs. system load (manually cleaned data; moving
60 min. average).
ashrae.org
February 2005
Similar relationships between ambient outdoor temperatures, system cooling load and A/C system energy efciency
were observed in the other three systems. The overall ndings
are summarized in Table 5.
Comparison of the ndings from the four systems indicates
the following in terms of their relative system performance:
The measured energy efficiency of the refrigeration
cycles in all four systems was broadly in line with their rated
efciencies.
The water-cooled chiller used in System 2 had the most
efcient refrigeration cycle, but the effect of this higher efciency on the overall system efciency was lost due to very
high ancillary energy consumption.
The typical system cooling eff iciency ratio of the
fan coil systems, weighted for their average system cooling
load, was, on average, 1.1 CER at 10% to 20% full-load
once the energy consumption of the entire system was taken
into account.
The typical energy efciency ratio of the DX split system,
weighted for its average system cooling load, was on average
1.5 CER at 44% of full-load or 40% higher than the average
fan coil systems.
The peak daily system cooling efciencies were measured to be between 1.4 and 1.7 for the fan coil systems and
3.4 for the DX system, on average 116% higher than the fan
coil systems.
System Efciency Modeling
32
ASHRAE Journal
Acknowledgments
February 2005