Sunteți pe pagina 1din 15

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281235498

JOB SATISFACTION A LITERATURE REVIEW ON


EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION, ATTITUDES AND
TURNOVER: WHAT IS...
Research August 2015
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1583.2800

CITATIONS

READS

3,325

1 author:
Edith Wakida
Mbarara University of Science & Technology (MUST)
6 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Integration of mental health into primary health care View project

All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate,


letting you access and read them immediately.

Available from: Edith Wakida


Retrieved on: 07 November 2016

JOB SATISFACTION A LITERATURE REVIEW ON EMPLOYEE


MOTIVATION, ATTITUDES AND TURNOVER: WHAT IS THE
RELATIONSHIP?

Human Resource Management

Edith Wakida
Dr. Wendell Lawther (Instructor PAD 6417)
University of Central Florida

Summer 2014

Job satisfaction is the extent to which one is happy with their job hence an employees
willingness to perform at an optimum level (Hoffman-Miller 2013). Aziri 2011, states that there
is no agreed upon definition of what job satisfaction is or what it represents; but there is need to
consider the nature and importance of the work. The article presents some definitions from
different authors describing job satisfaction as Positive and favorable attitudes towards the job
indicate job satisfaction (Armstrong, 2006); collection of feeling and beliefs that people
have about their current job (George et al., 2008), while Ravari et al 2011 look at job
satisfaction as a multi-dimensional1 concept. Generally the comparison of all the authors above
points towards employees positive or negative attitudes towards their jobs.
Job satisfaction focuses on three components of organizational behavior: that is
cognitive, affective, and behavioral and is widely used to determine overall satisfaction in human
capital management (Hoffman-Miller, 2013). A number of factors influence job satisfaction and
they change over time; the fluctuation could be attributed to changes within the workplace as
well as economic, demographic and social trends (SHRM, 2012).
This literature review paper look at job satisfaction under three sub-themes: motivation,
attitudes and turnover in relation to cognitive, affective, and behavioral aspects.
Motivating employees and keeping them satisfied are some of the ways that managers and
organizations retain employees and provide excellent service. Effectively motivating employees

An individual job satisfaction varies in time and space, between countries and geographical regions or
between units in the same departments. What may be job dissatisfaction for an employee in a
developed country may actually be a job satisfaction for somebody from a developing or least
developed country. Within the same individual, there may be job satisfaction at a certain time and the
next time, there is dissatisfaction.
1

requires an understanding of the different types of motivation2 so as to apply the appropriate type
since different people respond differently. The types are intrinsic3 and extrinsic4 motivation.
Sub theme employee attitude5 which will be looked at in three ways; cognitive6,
affective7 and behavioral8. Attitudes have characteristic like persistence unless something is done
to change; they fall range from very favorable to very unfavorable and attitudes are directed
toward some object about which a person has feelings (affect) and beliefs.
Lastly the paper looks at employee turnover9 which involves employees leaving an
organization over a given period of time. This is classified into voluntary10 and involuntary11
turnover.
Sub-theme 1: Employee Motivation
Motivating employees and keeping them satisfied are some of the ways that managers
and organizations retain employees and provide excellent service (DiPietro et al 2014). This

The reason(s) someone works at a particular job and for a particular organization.
Means "from within" the employee individual has the desire to perform a specific task, because its
results are in accordance with their belief system or fulfills a desire and therefore importance is
attached to it
4
Motivation comes from outside. These people believe that difficult tasks can be dealt with provided
there is a reward upon completion of that task.
5
How one looks at something
6
The opinion or belief that one has; it involves evaluation of whatever goes on at work-whether one
deserves something or not
7
Emotional or feelings-this describes what the employee feels at any particular time; sometimes they
may feel sidelined or favored above others. These feelings can be subjective in most cases.
8
Intention to behave in a certain way towards someone or something-the action taken by the employee
especially if they feel no body is caring about their issue.
9
Changes in the work force resulting from voluntary or involuntary resignations; this can be the number
or percentage of employees leaving an organization and being replaced with new ones.
10
Voluntary turnover is when the employee chooses to leave for whatever reason.
11
Involuntary turnover is caused by layoffs and similar actions where the decision for an employee to
leave is made by the company and not the employee.
3

author is in agreement with Nohria et al 2008 who state that the most enduring and slippery
challenge managers have is getting people to do their best work, even in trying circumstances.
According to Thahier et al. (2014), motivating employees is very important because
motivation of every individual is his willingness to unreservedly work hard for high productivity;
meaning the employee is willing to use all the abilities that he has for the sake of his organization
by utilizing the available opportunities to accomplish his organizations mission. They further
quote McClelland on need for achievement12, need for power13 and need for affiliation14 as
motivators for achievement and satisfaction. On the contrary, according to Nohria et al 2008, the
things that influence choices and underlie everything we do are the drives to acquire both
tangible and intangible things; the need to bond with others; comprehend15; and defend or protect
against external threats and promote justice.
DiPietro et al (2014) in their article state that employees are motivated by intrinsic16 and
extrinsic factors which are driven by the interest or enjoyment of the task (intrinsic) and things
that come from outside the individual, such as money or rewards (extrinsic). This is similar to

12

The need for achievement is the driving force that motivates the spirit of one's work. Therefore, the
need for achievement would encourage someone to develop creativity and skills as well as direct all its
energy in order to achieve optimal performance.
13
The need for power is the desire to have impact, influence, and to control others. Individuals with a
high need for power enjoy to be burdened, struggle to be able to influence others, prefer to be placed in
a competitive situation and status -oriented, and tend to be more concerned about the prestige and to
gain influence over others with effective performance.
14
People who have a basic desire to establish and maintain interpersonal relationships are important,
positive, and lasting.
15
Satisfy our curiosity and master the world around us. Usually, when one feels like they are in charge,
then they feel motivated to do what they ought to do. If all the necessary information is availed to the
employees, then most likely they will be motivated to understand what it is all about so that they are at
a cutting edge perhaps over the others. The challenge here through is that they may under look the
supervisors especially when they feel like they are on top of the game.
16
Intrinsic motivation is distinctive in that employees are motivated without external rewards or
recognition, and it works as the most powerful driver of employee attitudes and performance.
3

Cho & Perry (2012) who say that individuals are intrinsically motivated when they seek
enjoyment, but add on interest, satisfaction of curiosity, self-expression, or personal challenge in
the work while extrinsically motivated when they engage in activities to obtain a goal that is
separate from the work itself.
Motivation or employee rewards come in various forms such as improving working
conditions, providing opportunities for growth, and recognizing employee accomplishments or
remuneration, however, using intrinsic motivators like providing a sense of belonging for the
employee and recognition of a job well done goes a long way in making them excited about their
jobs. Similarly, job enrichment17, empowerment and sharing power help some employees feel
motivated at work (Honore, 2009, DiPietro et al 2014).
There are influencing conditions in order to have intrinsic and extrinsic effects of
motivation. Cho & Perry (2012) present two situational variables-managerial trustworthiness and
goal preparedness as the influencing factors for intrinsic effects while an individual attribute to
extrinsic reward expectancy. They further suggest that Managerial trustworthiness18 and goal
directedness19 increase the leverage of intrinsic motivation on employee satisfaction, whereas
extrinsic rewards expectancy decreases the leverage.
With trustworthiness comes motivation for the employees as they will have high expectations of
learning from their supervisor. Having trustworthy supervisors helps employees direct their

17

Providing the employee with more responsibilities to help boost their confidence-this creates a feeling of trust
within the worker thus propelling self-confidence high job performance.
18

This includes elements like competence, consistency, fairness, integrity, loyalty, openness, receptivity,
and benevolence. If supervisors do not have these elements, it becomes difficult for the employees to
trust or respect them.
19

Goal preparedness is taken to mean having set goals and performance targets. This is believed to increase
motivation because it is clear to the employees the direction they are taking and what is required of them so they
will work towards attaining the goals.

efforts toward their task performance without worrying about interruptions from supervisors or
conflicts with them. (DiPietro et al 2014).
Extrinsic motivation comes about when an activity is done in order to attain some
separable outcome, one does not necessarily enjoy doing the task but because there is an
outcome they want to achieve, they will be motivated to do it. However, as extrinsic motivation
rises, intrinsic motivation decreases because the person starts to only look for external rewards
instead of working on something for personal satisfaction (Burton, 2012).
Sub-theme 2: Employee Attitude
According to Saari & Judge (2004) employees have attitudes20 or viewpoints about
different aspects of their jobs, their careers, and their organizations. They are composed of
emotion, thought and behaviors. This is similar to what Man et al (2011) suggest and they go
ahead to define emotion as an individual being positive, negative or neutral about something;
they look at thought as knowledge towards things while behavior is considered the action taken
after emotions and knowledge.
Edgar & Geare (2013) use job satisfaction and affective commitment to measure
employee satisfaction. They look at job satisfaction as the attitude of workers towards the
organization, their job, fellow workers and other psychological objects of the work environment.
Attitude has three components which are cognitive, affective and behavioral in nature but
there are also functions for attitude: there is the adjustment function which assists the employee

20

Attitude describes the way one feels inside. These are his feelings toward you, coworkers and position within the
company. Every employee has an attitude towards the environment -- either good or bad. Attitude ties in very well
with employee motivation, when the one does not feel motivated to work, most likely there will be negative
attitudes towards work leading to low performance.

to reposition to their work environment, ego-defensive21 function, value-defensive22 function and


knowledge23 function. According to Saari & Judge (2004), there are causes of attitude change
which have not yet been understood by practitioners, these include; dispositional24 influences,
cultural25 influences and work situation26 influences. There is a suggestion that the four crosscultural dimensional causes of attitude change are: (1) individualism-collectivism; (2)
uncertainty avoidance versus risk taking; (3) power distance, or the extent to which power is
unequally distributed; and (4) masculinity/femininity, more recently called achievement
orientation. Lastly, the nature of work and attitude is very important; employers think that
employees are more interested in the pay they get thus attitude change, however, job challenge27,
autonomy, variety, and scopebest predicts overall job satisfaction, as well as other important
outcomes like employee retention.

21

Ego defensive function helps employees to retain their dignity and self-image. Egos however cause
attitude conflicts within employees, one may feel right about something while another opposes. Usually
there is need for one to concede defeat which is not very easy or accepted due to the ego stint.
22
Attitudes provide individuals with a basis for expressing their values. Not all employees share the
same values so each one may want to defend what they believe in-in this way, there is bound to have all
sorts of attitudes within the employees depending on what they believe in.
23
Attitudes provide standards and frames of reference that allow people to understand and perceive
the world around him.
24
Disposition is something to do with temperaments or personality. If during selection of employees a
personality is not well matched with the job requirements, then there is likely to be an attitude problem
with that employee. It is however challenging to correctly judge ones temperament during employee
selection, so there are likely to be attitude problems especially if wrong people were selected for a
particular job in that aspect. There is a link between a persons personality and job satisfaction. Negative
people are usually not satisfied with their jobs.
25
Cultural influences have to do with where the employee is from (culture or Country). It is quite
common that some countries feel more superior to others so if an employee comes from a country
considered inferior, even though they have the qualifications for a position, they may not be given
because of the bias that they might possibly be incompetent for the position. Such an employee may be
given a lower position than deserved so this is likely to affect their attitude from the onset.
26
Jobs with good compensation have average job satisfaction levels. Money may be a motivator, but
may not stimulate job satisfaction.
27
Most people prefer work that is challenging and stimulating. This helps them to learn more and avoid
boredom at work-breaking routine.
6

According to Edgar & Geare (2013), employee reactions are a behaviorally oriented
response to employee attitudes, this can be seen when the employee acts above and beyond the
normal duty. Satisfied employees who feel fairly treated by and are trusting of the organization
are more willing to engage in behaviors that go beyond the normal expectations of their job.
Sub-theme 3: Employee Turnover
According to Bridger et al. (2013) employee turnover starts with an intention28; while
Hwang et al. (2013) adds that perceived job stress has significant negative relationships with job
satisfaction and significant positive relationships with turnover intention. Turnover intention is
caused by occupational stress; according to Bridger et al. (2013) and Hwang (2013) high level
of turnover intention could be attributed to occupational stresses. Occupational stresses
highlighted by Bridger et al. (2013) are physical and psycho-social job demands; role in the
organization; relationships at work; career development and organizational climate. Some of the
organization stress symptoms witnessed are high absenteeism, high staff turnover, poor morale,
reduced safety, and reduced operational capability. Hwang et al 2014 suggests the need to
enhance29 working conditions to improve job performance and convince employees not to leave
their job.
There are two types of employee turnover in organizations; voluntary and involuntary
turnover. Voluntary turnover is influenced by factors internal30 to the employee that influence a

28

Turnover intention is the last in a sequence of withdrawal cognitions, a set to which thinking of quitting and
intent to search for alternative employment also belong.
29
In order to enhance, the employer may have to carry out a study to know what exactly the employees are
lacking and relevantly address them. These usually vary, some employees need accommodation improvement,
others need remuneration, others need health insurance so depending on the need, the employer needs to be
sensitive while attempting to enhance working conditions.
30
Employees sometimes take on jobs with certain expectations but do not get what they expect, they may not be
comfortable with the supervisor or fail to fit in the work environment (peer challenge); this is likely to cause
internal conflict within the employee thus causing him/her to contemplate quitting.

certain behavior and decision-these are referred to as push factor whereas there are pull factors
like job opportunities in the market attracting the employee to go (Wocke and Heymann, 2012).
According to Self & Dewald (2011) the causes attracting employees turnover are higher pay31,
better work schedules, enhanced benefits offered in other fields and relationships with
supervisors for leaving. On the other hand, involuntary turnover is deliberately done by
organizations to retain high performers and to weed out lower performers.
Age, gender and education play a major role in turnover. The age32 of employees plays an
important part in employee commitment, being rooted in the job, psychological contract and the
decision to leave (Wocke and Heymann, 2012).
Employee turnover is detrimental to organizations as it involves a high social cost and
destroys firm-specific capital. With employee turnover, the ability to achieve an optimal level of
productivity is a major hurdle faced by companies Chang et al. (2011). Discovering why
employees stay33 could enable management to use this information to instill this in other
employees (Self & Dewald 2011).

31

Higher pay however may not be an absolute to contributor to employee retention although it plays a significant
role. Depending on the location of the employment-disease /was stricken area, security, safety, available facilities,
a high paying job may not attract employees to stay.
32
It is generally assumed that older employees are likely to be committed to their jobs than the younger ones. This
is because their needs and pursuits are different. When recruiting employees, it is therefore important that a
mixture of age groups is brought on board; each age group has something to offer to the organization but for
sustainability or continuity, having older people is helpful especially in mentoring the younger ones into staying
focused.
33
Different employees take on jobs and have motivators for working in those positions. Employers interacting with
the employees especially the ones who have stayed longer in the same job would be very informative as
management would actually get to know reasons that have kept the workers around and perhaps work harder at
retaining them more but also use them as reference points and mentors for the new hires. Conducting
commitment interviews also may help in further reducing turnover by singling out employees that enhance their
feelings of self-worth and trust by management found that identifying characteristics associated with employees
willingness to stay in a job could be used as predictors of job tenure.

Conclusion
Conclusively, motivating employees for better job satisfaction and performance is very
crucial for managers; they need to understand the types of existing motivations and know the
nature or personality of their employees and what makes them motivated so that they
appropriately motivate them. This will go a long way in helping retain high performers in the
organization as there will be satisfaction. Under high levels of trustworthiness, the leverage of
intrinsic motivation on satisfaction becomes stronger. Using extrinsic motivation by managers
also works as it pushes the employees to do what they would have not otherwise done; however
this motivation type is not very good because if there is high extrinsic expectancy, then intrinsic
motivation reduces and yet the target should be towards getting the employee to enjoy what they
are doing on the job.
Employee attitude is closely related to motivation; if the employee does not feel
motivated on the job, this affects how he/she feels about what they do, the job environment, the
organizational management and thus the ultimate outcome. On the other hand, when they are
motivated or are satisfied on their jobs, then high performance can be seen as there will be selfdrive to perform above the normal job expectations.
Management keeping in touch with the employees is very important especially if they are
to prevent, reduce or overcome the challenge of employee turnover. It may not be very helpful
finding out from the employees who have left the why they have left; instead, if managers
discovered why employees stay could enable management to use this information to instill this in
other employees.

References
Aziri B. 2011. JOB SATISFACTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW MANAGEMENT
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE VOL. 3 ISSUE 4 (2011) PP: 77-86 retrieved from
http://mrp.ase.ro/no34/f7.pdf
Burton 2012 A Study of Motivation: How to Get Your Employees Moving. SPEA Honors Thesis
Spring 2012 Indiana University.
Bridger. R. S, Day. A. J and Morton. K. 2013. (2013) Occupational stress and employee
turnover, Ergonomics, 56:11, 1629-1639, DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.836251 Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.836251
CHANG. A, CHAN. F, GUDMUNDSSON. A, & SAWANG. S, 2011.Motivating Blue-Collar
Employees: A Case Study of the Chinese Workforce. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 12:69
85, 2011Copyright 2011 Crown copyright ISSN: 1059-9231 print/1528-6940 online DOI:
10.1080/10599231.2011.537504
Cho.Y.J, and Perry. J.L, 2012. Intrinsic Motivation and Employee Attitudes: Role of Managerial
Trustworthiness, Goal Directedness, and Extrinsic Reward Expectancy. Review of Public
Personnel Administration 32(4) 382406 2012 SAGE Publications Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0734371X11421495
http://rop.sagepub.com
Edgar. F & Geare. A, 2013. An employee-centred analysis: professionals' experiences and
reactions to HRM . Published online: 20 Jun 2013 The International Journal of Human Resource
Management

10

Hwang. J, Lee. J, Park. S, Chang. H, Seongseop kim. S 2014. The Impact of Occupational Stress
on Employees Turnover Intention in the Luxury Hotel Segment International Journal of
Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 15:6077, 2014 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group,
LLC ISSN: 1525-6480 print/1525-6499 online DOI: 10.1080/15256480.2014.872898
Nohria. N, Groysberg. B, & Linda-Eling Lee 2008. Harvard Business Review. Employee
Motivation: A Powerful New Model. Harvard business review Julyaugust 2008. Retrieved from
http://www.ihrim.org/Pubonline/Wire/Feb11/EmployeeMotivation_HBR.pdf
Ravari A, Mirzaei T, Kazemi M, Jamalizadeh A, 2012. Job satisfaction as a multidimensional
concept: A systematic review study. Retrieved from
http://johe.rums.ac.ir/files/site1/user_files_2a71e2/admin-A-10-1-10-e98b6ad.pdf
Reinholt. M, Pedersen. T, & Foss. N.J, 2011. WHY A CENTRAL NETWORK POSITION
ISNT ENOUGH: THE ROLE OF MOTIVATION AND ABILITY FOR KNOWLEDGE
SHARING IN EMPLOYEE NETWORKS. Academy of Management Journal 2011, Vol. 54,
No. 6, 12771297. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465.amj.2009.0007. Retrieved from:
http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.net.ucf.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=d76de5f9-3bbd4820-b8d7-55b8347944dc@sessionmgr4003&vid=1&hid=4108
Saari.L.M & Judge. T.A 2004. EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES AND JOB SATISFACTION.
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, Winter 2004 retrieved from
http://www.utm.edu/staff/mikem/documents/jobsatisfaction.pdf
Self. T and Dewald. B 2011. Why Do Employees Stay? A Qualitative Exploration of Employee
Tenure. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 12:6072, 2011

11

Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1525-6480 print/1528-6499 online DOI:
10.1080/15256480.2011.540982
SHRM 2012 Employee Job Satisfaction and Engagement: How Employees Are Dealing With
Uncertainty. SHRM Research: www.shrm.org/research
Thahier. R, Ridjal. S, Risani. F 2014. The Influence Of Leadership Style And Motivation Upon
Employee Performance In The Provincial Secretary Office Of West Sulawesi. International
Journal Of Academic Research Vol. 6. No. 1. January, 2014
Albert Wcke & Marinus Heymann (2012) Impact of demographic variables on voluntary labour
turnover in South Africa, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23:16,
3479-3494, DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.639028. To link to this article:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.639028

12

13

S-ar putea să vă placă și