Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Gregory McClure
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, CA 92697
Dear Mr. McClure,
I write to you today to reflect on the overall process and product of my Rhetorical
Analysis Essay. This paper has been the main focus of this course, for the past five weeks.
Initially, I underestimated the difficulty of this paper because I did not account for the amount of
attention to detail this paper required. To be quite frank, I thought that my prior knowledge and
experience would suffice; I expected this to be a quick write. However, my stipulations were
incredibly incorrect.
In the beginning of my drafting process, I focused on the idea of manipulation. My claim
was that Mathesons success was due to his ability to manipulate expectations. One of my main
points was that Matheson transformed the mythical vampire into a work of science. However,
after many hours of drafting, trying to relate this to the purpose of the novel, and attending office
hours, I decided to revise my claim. My new claim focuses more on the text, the audience, and
the author, which is something that is always stressed by you. I strongly believe that office hours
and conferences with you made this essay possible for me. Without corresponding with you, I
believe that my essay would not have been up to your standards and I would have failed this
class. When I first emailed you about my thesis, you told me that my paper was incomplete and
struggling overall. This upset and confused me, but it motivated me to find a way to resolve the
incompleteness and stop struggling. I did not understand why or how my thesis was incomplete.
It wasnt until the discussion we had in class about theses and office hours that I was confident in
my thesis.
Something that I struggled with through the entire essay was the idea that Neville does
not exist. He does not feel anything. He is a bunch of words on paper. I understand this idea and
do not disagree with it, but I had an extremely difficult time writing this paper without using
Neville feels, since that had been accepted, up until this point. I knew what I wanted to say, but
I did not know how to word it without using Neville. My solution to this was reminding myself
that Matheson is Neville. Matheson created Neville to reflect his ideas; thus, this entire novel,
including Nevilleand Ruthis a collection Matheson and his thoughts. Another thing that was
new to me was that we are allowed to use I, you, and contractions. I was always taught that
these are huge red flags. In fact, an entire letter grade would be deducted if these were found in
your essay, in my AP English Language and Composition course.
Personally, I think this essay is everything I envisioned and more. Before this class, I
dreaded revisions because I did not know how to improve my work. However, I have revised this
essay countless times. Each time I received feedback, I would immediately revise. Truly, I feel
that office hours were extremely essential in the process of my paper. Peer reviews were also
helpful, but I feel that they are not the best source for feedback since other students may be
struggling with this assignment as well and may not have the time to give proper and genuine
feedback. Overall, I feel very content with my essay. I feel that I was able to embed quotes most
successfully. Rather than dropping the quotes in, I found a way to weave them in and create a
sense of flow. I also think that the arranging of topic sentences activity was very helpful because
I used the knowledge I learned from that activity to develop my topic sentences and the overall