Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Assignment 2
Due date:
14 October 2016
Weighting:
1.
Overview
This assessment is designed to test your achievement of selected learning objectives of Modules 6 to
9. In particular, the assignment involves estimation of urban design discharges, reservoir routing and
water balance. It is intended to reinforce and extend your knowledge on urban hydrology, using a low
density residential subdivision as a case study.
The assignment is divided into three parts:
Part A Estimation of Minor and Major design flows for the urban subdivision.
Part B Preliminary analysis of stormwater detention pond for one of the lots
Part C Preliminary water balance analysis of the pond
2.
2.1
A drainage scheme is to be designed for a residential located at near the Mackay aerodrome,
Queensland. A copy of the subdivision layout plan can be downloaded from Studydesk (Subdivision
Lots Layout.pdf). The subdivision includes a network of proposed internal roads (Roads 01 and 02).
Your task is to prepare a Minor system design check of the stormwater system along Road 01
upstream and including Pit 03/05 based on the preliminary layout and then a Major system check. The
Minor system is to cater for the 2 year ARI storm and the Major system for the 100 year ARI storm.
The system includes stormwater line 5 (pit 01/05 to pit 03/05) and line 6 (pit 01/06 to pit 03/05).
Pits will be based on Brisbane City Council standard drawings. Initial surface levels at pit locations
are given in Table 1.
Table 1: Initial design details at pit locations
Pit/Location
Finished Surface Level
(m LD)
01/05
303.97
02/05
303.91
03/05
303.65
01/06
303.65
LD = Local datum
Use the following information:
1. The approximate location of the subdivision is 21.17 S, 149.18 E
2. The road kerbs are BCC Type D kerb and channel. Roads 01 and 02 will have a 6.5m wide
road pavement (kerb to kerb) located within 16m road reserve. All roads have a dual crossfall
1|Pa g e
2.2
Scope of Part A
The scope of Part A is to undertake a Minor and Major analysis of the proposed drainage system by
completion of Hydrologic Design Sheets 1, 2 and 3 (as per Module 7 of the Study Book).
After completion of the Design Sheets, review the results and make suggestions on revisions to the
proposed road drainage system (e.g. requirement for additional pits, if any). It is not required to
reanalyse and update the Design Sheets.
The design sheets shall be supported by:
1. A plan showing the boundaries of each pit subcatchment and the flowpath to each pit used in
2|Pa g e
2.3
The following materials have been provided and can be downloaded from StudyDesk or from external
websites:
1. Subdivision layout base plan
2. Gully pit designs and hydraulic capacity charts can be downloaded from
http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/planning-building/planning-guidelines-andtools/guidelines/standard-drawings/index.htm
3. 2007-08 and 2013 Provisional QUDM can be downloaded from
http://www.dews.qld.gov.au/water-supply-regulations/urban-drainage
4. Refer to Bureau of Meteorology website for online IFD tool for design rainfalls.
3.
3.1
After the subdivision was constructed, a development application was received by the local Council
for a Material Change of Use redevelopment of Lot 38 which fronts the existing main road. The
proposal involved a change in land use from low density residential to a plant nursery open to the
public. The development will significantly increase the % impervious of the site. Specifically a sealed
carpark area 400 m2 in size is proposed.
Council is concerned with increased peak stormwater discharge from the carpark and have requested
the developer to include onsite detention within the lot site. The detention storage is to be sized such
that the Q2 and Q100 peak discharge from the redeveloped site doesnt worsen the stormwater
discharge to the Road 1 street drainage. The development conditions state that the peak stormwater
discharge from the carpark should not exceed that generated from the predeveloped carpark site area
(which is zero fraction impervious).
The concept for onsite detention is to provide a small open ornamental pond as shown schematically
in Figure 1. This approach was considered by the developer to be consistent with the garden centre
architecture. (It is expected that alternatives such as underground detention tanks or bioretention
systems would be preferred for a range of maintenance and mosquito hazard reasons). You have been
asked to provide an initial estimate of the pond surface area so an assessment can be made on how it
may be located within the lot. There are some design constraints such as the maximum water depth
(Figure 1). Assume that the pond in plan view is circular.
3|Pa g e
Detention Storage
SWL
1000
Max Q100
water depth
=500
FSL
Pipe discharge
to street
Pond
Vertical notch
(minimum gap =
100mm)
SWL
Figure 1 Sketch details of proposed carpark detention pond (Not to scale, all dimensions in mm)
3.2
Scope of Part B
The scope of Part B is to undertake a reservoir routing analysis of the proposed detention pond. For
the purpose of the assignment, the following simplifications can be used in the analysis:
1. Calculate the Q2 and Q100 peak discharges from the carpark area using the Rational method,
consistent with Part A drainage calculations. Assume that all carpark surface runoff will be
directed to the detention pond. Use the same format as Part A Sheet 1 to present the Rational
method estimates. Assume the pond will be located near the lot boundary at Road 1.
2. Assume the time of concentration for the 400 m2 carpark site is 8 minutes and 5 minutes for
the existing (predeveloped, before the carpark is installed) and future (developed, after the
carpark is installed) scenarios, respectively Assume 100% impervious for the carpark when
developed. It was decided to use the latest 2013 AR&R IFD rainfall intensities to estimate the
design discharges.
3. It was decided to complete the detention analysis based on the 2 year and 100 year ARI 20minute duration storm and the 2013 AR&R IFD rainfall intensities. This was due to the fact
that the Rational method only estimates the peak discharge whereas a full hydrograph is
needed to routing. Note that it would be normally expected to test various inflow
hydrographs corresponding to a range of design storm durations so the critical duration can be
identified (refer Critical Storm Duration, Section 6.3, Study Book). This is outside the scope
4|Pa g e
4.
4.1
The concept Stormwater detention pond given in Part B is also intended to function as an ornamental
water feature. As part of the desktop analysis, you have been also asked to quantify the requirements
for top-up water to maintain the pond at a relatively stable water depth. It was decided to size the
pond open surface area to 20 m2 for landscaping design purposes.
4.2
Scope of Part C
The scope of Part C is to undertake a water balance analysis and document the results. Assumptions
can be made to simplify the analysis:
1. Use daily rainfalls observed at Mackay Aerodrome for calendar years 2009 to 2011. This data
can be downloaded from the BOM website. Report the percentage of blank or missing data in
the data record. For the analysis, assume that no rainfall occurred on days when data is
missing.
2. Use the daily evapotranspiration data for Mackay Aerodrome provided in the EXCEL file
mackay_aero-ET.csv available on the course homepage. This file has been compiled from
monthly archived data obtained from the Bureau of Meteorology
http://www.bom.gov.au/watl/eto/. As a first approximation, assume the reference ETo
provides a reasonable estimate of the evaporation from the ornamental pond. Report the
percentage of blank or missing ETo data in the data record, For the analysis, infill the missing
data with the average daily ETo for that particular month.
3. The pond is fully sealed and it can be assumed that seepage or leakage loss from the pond is
zero. Water will not be extracted from the pond for onsite use such as irrigation. Assume that
5|Pa g e
5.
Submission
A report that documents the hydrological analyses that have completed. A marking scheme is
provided as Table 2. Use this marking scheme to check that you have addressed the full
scope of the work. If an element of the assignment has not been documented in the file
report than no marks will be given for that element. For reasons of consistency, a report
template (ENV3105Report2Template.docx) must be downloaded from Study Desk and used
to report your work. Complete each section of the report.
Part of the available marks has been allocated to reward reporting that is well set out and easy to
follow. Submissions that are untidy and/or poorly structured and thus difficult to assess will attract
less marks for this element.
Electronic submission of this assignment is required. One ZIP file will be accepted containing:
1. A single pdf document based on the template provided (rename the file based on the
convention below)
2. A single EXCEL spreadsheet
The following filename convention shall be used: *Ass2.zip, *Ass2.pdf and *Ass2.xlsx, where * is
your student name.
6|Pa g e
6.
Marking Scheme
Marks
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Detention Analysis
7|Pa g e
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Reporting
Assignment report
10
10
250
TOTAL MARKS
8|Pa g e