Stan J. Caterbone Local, State, and Federal Court (811 Pages/Bookmarks) Docket Sheets As of November 12, 2016

Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se Billing File
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,

Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
U.S. DISTRICT COURT DOCKET SHEETS

CASES STILL IN LITIGATION
OR DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
WILL RETURN TO LITIGATION

AFTER PERSON, PROPERTY, AND ELECTRONICS ARE SECURE
________________________________
1. 16-cv-04641-EGS HABEUS CORPUS CATERBONE v. Obama, et.al.,
OPEN
1. Sept. 9, 2016 REQUEST TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY
2. Transferred from Harrisburg District Court to Eastern District in Philadelphia
3. Dismissed Without Prejudice
2. 16-cv-04014-EGS COMPLAINT
CATERBONE v. United States, et.al., W/D
1. Withdraw Without Prejudice GRANTED on August 8, 2016
3. 16-mc-49-EGS
In re Stanley J. Caterbone
1. APPEAL to U.S. Third Circuit Case No. 16-3284
Chapter 11 Appeal
OPEN
4. 06-cv-04734-MAM
CATERBONE v. ISC FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT
1. Dismiss November 16, 2006 for FAILURE TO STATE CLAIM
5. 08-cv-02982-MAM
CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Dept. et.al.,
1. Withdraw Without Prejudice GRANTED on October 10, 2008
DISMISS
W/D
6. 05-cv-02288-MAM
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et.al.,
Third Circuit
1. U.S. Third Circuit Case No. 07-4474 Won Case DISMISSAL Overturned Oct. 22, 2008
3. August 8, 2011 George Warner of Barley Snyder, LLC Enters Appearance for Fulton Financial
7. 06-cv-04650-MAM
CATERBONE v. Randall O. Wenger, et.al.,
Third Circuit
1. U.S. Third Circuit Case No. 07-4475 Won Case DISMISSAL Overturned Oct. 23, 2007
8. 14-cv-02559-DP LAMBERT HABEUS CORPUS Movant for Lisa Michelle Lambert
1. U.S. Third Circuit Case No. 15-3400 DISMISSED
2. U.S. Third Circuit Case No. 16-1149 DISMISSED to U.S. SUPREME COURT BY October 28, 2016
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 1 of 811
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
Stan
Advanced
J. Caterbone
Media
and
Group
Advanced
and
Stan
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
J. Caterbone,
Group, ProPro
Se Se
Billing
Litigant
File
118 06-4734
Court
Case Description
United States Federal Courts
CATERBONE v. The United States
of America, et.al.,
CATERBONE HABEUS
LAMBERT HABEUS
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County
Prison, et.al.,
CATERBONE v. Randal Wenger,
et.al.,
CATERBONE v. Lancaster Bureau
of Police
Federal False Caims Act - ISC
Whistleblowing
119 16-CV-49
July 19, 2016 Hearing,

Chapter 11 Appeal from 16-10517 Allentown, PA
120 J.C. No. 03-16-90005
Office of the Circuit Executive,

Third Circuit
Lambert Judicial Complaint; 153400 and 16-1149
No.
Case No.
112 16-cv-4014
113 15-03984
114 14-02559
115 05-2288
116 06-4650
117 08-02982
121 J.C. No. 03-16-900042
Judge Smith, et.al.,

U.S. Bankruptcy Eastern District
122 16-10517
Chapter 11 To Appeal 16-cv-49
NEXT EVENT DUE
Judges
Docketed July 29, 2016

Assigned to Judge Smith Edward Smith
Curtis Joyner
Paul Diamond
Mary McLaughlin
Mary McLaughlin
Mary McLaughlin
Mary McLaughlin
Edward Smith
FINAL ORDER on June

24, 2016 DISMISSAL
Fedex Delivery on July
29, 2016
Richard E. Fehling
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals
123 15-3400
14-02559 LAMBERT HABEUS
124 16-1149
14-02559 LAMBERT HABEUS
125 16-1001
126 15-1124
15-03984 CATERBONE HABEUS

14-02559 LAMBERT ATTY
127 07-4475
128 07-4474
129 16-3284
06-4650 REVERSE DISMISSAL

05-2288; REVERSE DISMISSAL
16-MC-2016 Chapter 11 AppealJudge Smith
Federal,
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
State, and
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Local COURT
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
101of
of811
171
499
8
Judge Michael
Fisher Signed
Former PA A
ttorney General
Prosecuted
Lambert
Judge Michael
Fisher Signed
Former PA A
ttorney General
Prosecuted
Lambert
Judge Michael
Fisher Signed
Former PA A
ttorney General
Prosecuted
Lambert
Sloviter, Barry,
and NyGaard
Circuit Judges
Sloviter, Barry,
and NyGaard
Circuit Judges
Edward Smith
Thursday
Wednesday
Sunday November
August 13,
17, 2016
10,
Stan
Advanced
J. Caterbone
Media
and
Group
Advanced
and
Stan
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
J. Caterbone,
Group, ProPro
Se Se
Billing
Litigant
File
Case No.
130 1164 EDA 2016
131 1561 MDA 2015
132 1519 MDA 2016
Case No.
133 495 MAL 2016
134 496 MAL 2016
135 353 MT 2016
136 354 MT 2016
137 108 MAL 2016
Case No.
138 08-13373
139 15-10167
PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR
Kathleen Kane Amicus
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County
Residents
CATERBONE v. Lancaster Bureau
of Police
Notes
Judges
PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME
1561 CATERBONE v. Lancaster
County Residents
Bureau of Police
County Residents
Bureau of Police
Kathleen Kane Amicus
Notes
Judges
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS
CATERBONE v. Duke Street
Business Center, et.al.,
CATERBONE v. Lancaster Film
Commission
July 28, 2016 Citations

Due Plus $85.00 Fee
July 28, 2016 Citations
Due Plus $85.00 Fee
Notes
Nothing Ruled On in
Case IFP Not Ruled On
142 CP-36-MD-1108-15
CATERBONE v. Lancaster General

Hospital/Dr. Emily Pressley
CATERBONE v. Southern Regional
Police Department
Petition For Review v. Lancaster
City Police
143 16-05815
144 CP-36-SA-0000247-2016
145 CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Preliminary Emergency Injunction IFP Denied July 8, 2016

Summary Appeal Jemenez
Fee Paid
Summary Appeal Albert
IFP APPROVED
140 06-03349
141 06-03401
Case No.
146 2016-462 (Brown)
Case No.
147 CP-22-SA-0000067-2016
PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL
CONDUCT BOARD
Judge Leonard Brown III Case
No. 16-05815 Preliminary
Emergency Injunction
DAUPHIN COUNTY COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS
MJ-12104-TR0000911-2016
Federal,
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
State, and
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Local COURT
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
112of
of811
171
499
8
Judges
Notes
Leonard Brown III
Judges
Docketed August 4, 2016
Notes
Judges
Missed Hearing Monday
June 27, 2016 Deleted
it from calender
Thursday
Wednesday
Sunday November
August 13,
17, 2016
10,
Stan
Advanced
J. Caterbone
Media
and
Group
Advanced
and
Stan
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
J. Caterbone,
Group, ProPro
Se Se
Billing
Litigant
File
Case No.
LANCASTER COUNTY MDJ
MJ-02204-TR-0001981148 2016 No Parking Permitted
Summary Appeal
MJ02301-TR-00000281149 2016 Left Turn, Accident
Summary Appeal CP-36-SA0000219-2016
MJ-02101-TR-0002242150 2016 Following Too Close
Federal,
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
State, and
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Local COURT
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
123of
of811
171
499
8
Notes
July 27, 2016 2:30pm

Witkonis
Judges
Charges Dismissed by L
City Police
Thursday
Wednesday
Sunday November
August 13,
17, 2016
10,
Stan
Advanced
J. Caterbone
Media
and
Group
Advanced
and
Stan
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
J. Caterbone,
Group, ProPro
Se Se
Billing
Litigant
File
CASES FROM
2005 TO 2014
UNTIED STATES FEDERAL COURTS
Case No.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern

District of Pennsylvania
Notes
Judges
1 CA 06-1538
Fulton Bank Auto Stay
2 No. 05-23059
U.S. Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Petition
They want to discharge or

convert to Chapter 7
3 05-cv-2288
Sealed Federal Case 1987 to Present
Need to Amend and talk to

Tony, As soon as PP&L turns
electric back on and get
back in Office with Drivers Judge Mary
License*
McLaughlin-
4 CA-05-3689
6 06-cv-4154
7 06-CV-4650
Chapter 11 Dismissal
Appealed Order to have Brief due by
Sept 06 by Judge Fehling
Appeal Hearing for PP&L did not get
notice until day of Hearing
RICO Complaint
8 06-cv-4734
Federal False Caims Act - ISC

Whistleblowing
9 06-cv-5138
Habeas Corpus Lanc County Prison
5 CA 06-5117
Case No.
10 07-cv-2151
11 06-cv-3955
Case No.
12 06-cv-3054
13 07-cv-4474
14 07-cv-4475
Case No.
15 CI-05-03644
16 CI-06-07376
Judge Anita Brody

Judge Twardowski
to Richard E. Fehling
Awarded Appeal
Judge Anita Brody
See **
Judge Anita Brody

Judge Anita Brody
Judge Mary McLaughlin
Judge Mary McLaughlin

Appeal Order to 06-5012 CH 11
Dismissal by US DOJ Trustee
See **
Appeal Order to Amend Complaint by
Sept 15 2006 05-2288
See **
Notes
Judges
Notes
Judges
Notes
Judges
Appeal Brody PP&L

Appeal McLaughlin 05-2288 Oct 24
Dismissal
Appeal McLaughlin 06-4650 Oct 24
Dismissal
PA Court of Common Pleas
S Caterbone AMG PH v. D Anthon
Eden Resort
S Caterbone v. Mike Caterbone
Federal,
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
State, and
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Local COURT
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
134of
of811
171
499
8
Must Collect
Defaulted
Non Assigned
Non Assigned
Thursday
Wednesday
Sunday November
August 13,
17, 2016
10,
Stan
Advanced
J. Caterbone
Media
and
Group
Advanced
and
Stan
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
J. Caterbone,
Group, ProPro
Se Se
Billing
Litigant
File
Case No.
PA Court of Common Pleas
Notes
17 CI-06-03403
S Caterbone v. Thomas Grasell
18 CI-06-03401
S Caterbone v. Conestoga Police
19 CI-06-03349
S Caterbone v. Lancaster General

Hospital
Defualted, May move to

Federal
20 CI-06-07330
S Caterbone AMG v. Harleysville
Non Assigned
21 CI-O6-04939
22 CI-06-02271
S Cat AMG v Pflumm,Stabley,Mike

Fulton Bank v. S Caterbone
Foreclosure
Defualted
Never Recorde by
Prothonetary
Appeal Superior Ct
Non Assigned
23 CI-06-07188
S Caterbone AMG v. PPL Electric
Remove to Ch 11
Non Assigned
24 CI-06-06658
S Caterbone AMG v. PennDOT
Appeal Superior Ct
Non Assigned
25 CI-06-08490
26
27 CV-0000207-05
S Caterbone AMG v. M. Schaefer

Millersvill Boro Police Dept
District Justice
1250 Renovations Payment
28 Cv-160-06
Defaulted
Judges
Non Assigned
Judge Madenspacher
reasgined it to
Judge Georgelis so
he said
Non Assigned
Non Assigned
Non Assigned
Won and Collected

Awaiting Verdict from July
20th, 2006
DJ Sheryl Hartman
31 CI-07-00366
S Cat AMG v Comcast

Emergency Petition Set Aside Stone
Hill Road Sheriff Sale
Emergency Petition Food Stamps
Emergency Injuncion
Obstruction,Fraud,Embezzlement
32 CI-07-03924
Case No.
Caterbone v Lombardo & Office Max

PA Superior Court
33 1463 MDA 2006
Fulton Bank v. S. Caterbone
34 1462 MDA 2006
S Caterbone v. PennDOT
Judge Cullen to
Judge Georgelis?
35 1461 MDA 2006
S. Caterbone v. S Regional Police
Judge Allison
36 855 MDA 2007
Comm of PA v Caterbone Fiorill

Caterbone v Totaro 00366 May 11
Judement
Caterbone v Totaro 00366 Feb 24
Reconsider IFP Frivelous
Comm of PA v Caterbone East
Lampeter Judge Farina
Comm of PA v Caterbone Dauphin
County Harrisburg Airport Ticket
Caterbone v. Lancaster General
Hospital/Dr. Emily Pressley
Judge Reinaker
29 CI-07-00019
30 CI-07-00150
37 951 MDA 2007

38 950 MDA 2007
39 125 MDA 2007
40 435 MDA 2007
41 1565 MDA 2007
Federal,
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
State, and
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Local COURT
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
145of
of811
171
499
8
Notes
No Opinion
MDJ Ballentine
Judges
Judge Georgelis
Judge Cullen
Judge Cullen
Judge Farina
Judge Cullen
Thursday
Wednesday
Sunday November
August 13,
17, 2016
10,
Stan
Advanced
J. Caterbone
Media
and
Group
Advanced
and
Stan
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
J. Caterbone,
Group, ProPro
Se Se
Billing
Litigant
File
Case No.
PA Superior Court
47 248 MDA Reconsideration
DUI Motion to Rescind Bail

Supervision
Penn DOT
S-154-2007 Ballentine Insurance
S-158-2007 Simms Disorderly
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Superior Court Appeal 1463 MDA
1463
Superior Court Appeal 1463 MDA
1463
48 432 MT 2007
Superior Court Appeal 950 MDA 2007
49 433 MT 2007
50 418 MT 2007
51 128 MM 2007
Case No.

Commonwealth Court
52 1130 CD 2007
Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-003
53 1444 CD 2007
Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-003
54 1442 CD 2007
Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-004A
42
43
44
45
1097
1103
2052
2053
MDA
MDA
MDA
MDA
2007
2007
2007
2007
46 248 MDA 2007
Case No.
Criminal District Justice - 27

Overturned
Notes
Georgelis
Georgelis
Notes
55 CV-0000207-05
Harrasment; Letter about cat
Notes
Must File Appeal, Never
received Notice for Appeal
Hearing Sept 2005Cat
killed, I'm charged
56 District Justice
Buser File Fleeing Arresting Officer

Southern Regional Speeding &
InspectionHearing Jun 9th 9:00 am
Appeal No. SA159-2006
57 TR-0000245-06
58 TR-0003020-06
59 TR-0000085-06
60 SP2421099
Case No.
61 TR-0001010-06
62 TR-0001011-06
Reading Parking Meter & Inspection

Southern Regional 2 Girls Walking
asked time when burglar in 220 Stone Must file Appeal - All lies;
Hill Went to Store for help
burglary
Driving Violation, was never
Vineland, NJ 856-691-4111 39:4-97 stopped or saw any police
Overturned
Notes
A complete lie, Fiorill
Firorill Careless Driving
perjury, off duty
A complete lie, took
picture, he had matress on
Firorill Careless Driving to Close
top of car
Federal,
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
State, and
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Local COURT
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
156of
of811
171
499
8
Judges
Judges
MDJ Eckert
MDJ Eckert to
Hamilton
MDJ Eckert to
Mylin
Judge Thomas
Xavios
Judge QuarryvilleJ
udge Eckert
Judges
MDJ Eckert
to Hamilton
MDJ Eckert
to Hamilton
Thursday
Wednesday
Sunday November
August 13,
17, 2016
10,
Stan
Advanced
J. Caterbone
Media
and
Group
Advanced
and
Stan
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
J. Caterbone,
Group, ProPro
Se Se
Billing
Litigant
File
Case No.

Overturned
Notes
Judges
He was on bike, never went
through stop sign, he was
the one at the Police
Station that did illusion
trick
MDJ Ballentine
63 TR-0002658-06
Whiteford Insurance Card
64 NT-0000220-06
Terroristic Threat Evacuate Bld
65 CR-0000141-06
DUI;Resisting Arrest;Offensive
Weapons
66 CR-0000385-06
67 TR-0004428-06
Disorderly Conduct
Parking Meter Violation
Fabricated
.073 w/ mouth wash/I
turned then they put lights
on, wood hatchet in van
Got mad when he was
wrong about IFP law, Right
before Littering Hearing,
Lanc Cop would have been
made fool of
S
68
Comcast v. S Caterbone
verdict on July 20 2006
69 TR-0002645-06
70 TR-0004428-06
Careless Driving; Stop Sign Violation

Meter Violation
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
HIA Parking Violation

Parking Meter Violation
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas
TR-0001517
TR-0005057
TR-0008503-06
TR-0008735-06
TR-0006812-06
TR-0008037-06
TR-0008066-06
TR-0007880-06
TR-0008721-06
TR-0008578-06
TR-0003557-06
82 TR-0004428-06
83 TR-0003557-06
84 TR-0000598-06

MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas-MDJ
Roth
85 TR-0002645-06
86 TR-0002646-06
MDJ Ballentine/Whiteford
MDJ Ballentine/Whiteford
87 TR-0007528-06
MDJ Simms/Wilcox-Bourne Witness
88 TR-2183-2006
89 TR-2184-2006
MDJ Eckert Stoltzfus

MDJ Eckert Stoltzfus
Federal,
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
State, and
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Local COURT
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
167of
of811
171
499
8
MDJ Eckert
to Commins
MDJ Hamilton
to Commins
MDJ Simms
MDJ Simms
MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Ballentine
verdict on June 28 2006

Picking up Sheryl at
Harrisburg International,
grounded plane,
Lance;Clinton; Wendell
married on Sat night
MDJ Simms
MDJ Smith/Dauphin Cty

MDJ Solomon/Duaphin
Roth
Thursday
Wednesday
Sunday November
August 13,
17, 2016
10,
Stan
Advanced
J. Caterbone
Media
and
Group
Advanced
and
Stan
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
J. Caterbone,
Group, ProPro
Se Se
Billing
Litigant
File
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
Case No.
2006-214
2006-215
2006-220
2006-221
2006-222
2006-224
20062005 -
98 2007Case No.
99 MD 51-2007
100 Ap NT-0000569-2006
101 Ap NT-0000562-2006
102 Ap NT-0000561-2006
103 MD-6-2006
104
105 MD-10-2007
106 MD-11-2007
107 MD-12-2007
PA Judicial Conduct Review Board

(MDJ William G. Reuter)
MDJ B. Denise Commins)
(MDJ Lm H. Eckert, Jr.)
(MDJ Stuart J. Mylh)
(MDJ Maynard A. Hamilton, Jr.)
(Judge David Reineker)
Geogelis August
Eckert
Farina,Reinaker,Cullins,Eckert,Commi
ns
Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas of Pennsylvania
Change Venue/Continuance Simms
Jan23
Appeal Summary Conviction EckertStoltzfus jan 19, 2007
Continuance-Eckert Stotzfus
Appeal MD-6Continuance-Eckert
Stotzfus
Notes
Notes
TR-0008735;TR0008578;TR-8721;TR0008503;TR-0007528
Judges
Judges
Cullin
TR-0002184-06;tr0002183-06;NT-000056906;NT-0000561-06;NT0000562-06
Nunc Pro Tunc

TR-3557-06 Nunc Pro Tunc Fiorill
Tickets
Nunc Pro Tunc Fiorill Tickets
108 CP-36-SA-0000159-2006
Nunc Pro Tunc
109 MD-0006-2007
Eckert Change Venue
110 SA-158-07
Simms NT-0001707-2006
111 SA-154-2007
Ballentine TR-0002658-2006
Federal,
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
State, and
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Local COURT
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
178of
of811
171
499
8
Thursday
Wednesday
Sunday November
August 13,
17, 2016
10,

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
Case 2:16-mc-00049-EGS Stan

Document
38 Filed
08/14/16
1 of 9Pro Se Billing File
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Page
Caterbone,
Group,
Stan J. Caterbone
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STANLEY J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

PLAINTIFF
:
:
v.
:
:
The United States of America, et al.
:
DEFENDANTS
:
:
:
CASE NO. 16-04014
MOTION TO WITHDRAW (Typed Version of Previous Filing)
I, Stanley J. Caterbone on this 5 th day of August 2016, Appearing Pro Se, Do hereby file this
MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to the Hostile Environment of the U.S. District
Courts which is being used as a means of causing severe mental anguish, pain, and suffering
which is in essence obstruction of justice in the most extreme sense. See the Third Circuit Docket
07-4474 attached.
Dated:
August 5, 2016
_____________________________
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
Case 2:16-mc-00049-EGS
Document
38
Filed
08/14/16
Filed at U.S.
District
Clerk
ofAdvanced
Court
Counter
Stan
J. Caterbone
and
Stan
Media
J. Page
Caterbone,
Group,
Case Caterbone
Stan
LOCAL,
No.STATE,
16-04014
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Motion To
COURT
COURT
Withdraw
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
Page
22
11of
of811
17
171
499
7
8
Thursday
Sunday November
August13,
10,
5, 2016

Document
38 Filed
08/14/16
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Page
Caterbone,
Group,
Case Caterbone
Stan
LOCAL,
No.STATE,
16-04014
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Motion To
COURT
COURT
Withdraw
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
232of
of811
171
499
8
Thursday
Sunday November
August13,
10,
5, 2016

Document
38 Filed
08/14/16
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Page
Caterbone,
Group,
Case Caterbone
Stan
LOCAL,
No.STATE,
16-04014
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Motion To
COURT
COURT
Withdraw
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
243of
of811
171
499
8
Thursday
Sunday November
August13,
10,
5, 2016

Document
38 Filed
08/14/16
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Page
Caterbone,
Group,
Case Caterbone
Stan
LOCAL,
No.STATE,
16-04014
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Motion To
COURT
COURT
Withdraw
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
254of
of811
171
499
8
Thursday
Sunday November
August13,
10,
5, 2016

Document
38 Filed
08/14/16
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Page
Caterbone,
Group,
Case Caterbone
Stan
LOCAL,
No.STATE,
16-04014
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Motion To
COURT
COURT
Withdraw
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
265of
of811
171
499
8
Thursday
Sunday November
August13,
10,
5, 2016

Document
38 Filed
08/14/16
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Page
Caterbone,
Group,
Case Caterbone
Stan
LOCAL,
No.STATE,
16-04014
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Motion To
COURT
COURT
Withdraw
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
276of
of811
171
499
8
Thursday
Sunday November
August13,
10,
5, 2016

Document
38 Filed
08/14/16
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Page
Caterbone,
Group,
Case Caterbone
Stan
LOCAL,
No.STATE,
16-04014
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Motion To
COURT
COURT
Withdraw
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
287of
of811
171
499
8
Thursday
Sunday November
August13,
10,
5, 2016

Document
38 Filed
08/14/16
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Page
Caterbone,
Group,
Case Caterbone
Stan
LOCAL,
No.STATE,
16-04014
FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
Motion To
COURT
COURT
Withdraw
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page
298of
of811
171
499
8
Thursday
Sunday November
August13,
10,
5, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKETS
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
LOCAL, STATE, & FEDERAL COURT DOCKETS

499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 59
DOCKETS
58 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 60
DOCKETS
59 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 61
DOCKETS
60 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 62
DOCKETS
61 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 63
DOCKETS
62 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 64
DOCKETS
63 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 65
DOCKETS
64 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 66
DOCKETS
65 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 67
DOCKETS
66 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 68
DOCKETS
67 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 69
DOCKETS
68 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 70
DOCKETS
69 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 71
DOCKETS
70 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 72
DOCKETS
71 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 73
DOCKETS
72 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 74
DOCKETS
73 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 75
DOCKETS
74 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 76
DOCKETS
75 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 77
DOCKETS
76 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 78
DOCKETS
77 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 79
DOCKETS
78 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 80
DOCKETS
79 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 81
DOCKETS
80 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 82
DOCKETS
81 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 83
DOCKETS
82 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 84
DOCKETS
83 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 85
DOCKETS
84 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
AFFIDAVIT OR DECLARATION
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, Pro Se , am the petitioner in the above-entitled case. In support of
my motion to proceed in forma pauperis, I state that because of my poverty I am unable to pay
the costs of this case or to give security therefor; and I believe I am entitled to redress.
1. For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received from each of
the following sources during the past 12 months. Adjust any amount that was received
weekly, biweekly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate. Use gross
amounts, that is, amounts before any deductions for taxes or otherwise.
Income source
Average monthly amount during

the past 12 months
Amount expected
next month
You
Spouse
You
Spouse
Employment
Self-employment
Income from real property

(such as rental income)
Interest and dividends
Gifts
Alimony
Child Support
Retirement (such as social

security, pensions,
annuities, insurance)
Disability (such as social

$ 1,357.00
security, insurance payments)
Unemployment payments
Public-assistance
(such as welfare)
Other (specify):
Total monthly income:
1,357.00
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page86
85
2 of 811
45
62
70
88
171
499
1,357.00
1,357.00
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
2. List your employment history for the past two years, most recent rst. (Gross monthly pay
is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer
Address
Dates of
Employment
Gross monthly pay

$
$
$
3. List your spouses employment history for the past two years, most recent employer rst.
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer
Address
Dates of
Employment
Gross monthly pay

$
$
$
4. How much cash do you and your spouse have? $

Below, state any money you or your spouse have in bank accounts or in any other nancial
institution.
Financial institution
Type of account
Members1st
TD Ameritrade
Checking
Money Market
Amount you have

$ 1,000.00
$ 12,000.00
$
Amount your spouse has

$
$
$
5. List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse owns. Do not list clothing
and ordinary household furnishings.
X Home
D
Value 25% of 80,000.00
D Other real estate

Value
D Motor Vehicle #1
Year, make & model
Value
D Motor Vehicle #2
Year, make & model
Value
D Other assets
Description
Value
997,000 Shares of NON-MARKETABLE Stock in Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page87
86
3 of 811
45
62
70
88
171
499
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 88
DOCKETS
87 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
You
Transportation (not including motor vehicle payments)
Recreation, entertainment, newspapers, magazines, etc.
Your spouse
100.00
200.00
Insurance (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments)

48.00
Homeowners or renters
Life
Health
Motor Vehicle
Other:
Office/Computer/Copying/Printing/Postage
300.00
Taxes (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments)

$
Motor Vehicle
Credit card(s)
Department store(s)
Other:
Alimony, maintenance, and support paid to others
Regular expenses for operation of business, profession,
or farm (attach detailed statement)
Other (specify):
500.00
2,658.00
(specify):
Installment payments
Home Improvement
Total monthly expenses:
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page89
88
5 of 811
45
62
70
88
171
499
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 90
DOCKETS
89 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
No.
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
PETITIONER
(Your Name)
vs.
Superintendent Framingham MCI, et al
RESPONDENT(S)
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO
U.S. THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
(NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS OF YOUR CASE)
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Stanley J. Caterbone
(Your Name)
1250 Fremont Street
(Address)
Lancaster, PA 17603
(City, State, Zip Code)

(717) 669-2163
(Phone Number)
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page91
90
7 of 811
45
62
70
88
171
499
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED
July 18, 2016 C.A. 16-1149 ORDER Present Chargaras, Jordan, and Venaskie [The foregoing motion for reconsideration of the Clerk's Order is construed as a motion to review
that order and is denied as meritless. The Clerk has the authority under 3d Cir. LAR 3.3 and Misc.
107.1(a) to dismiss an appeal for failure to satisfy the fee requirement.
Appellant received
written notice of the need to take care of his fee obligation, and he failed to respond with either
payment of the fees or a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Appellant's
contention that he is being unjustly taxed twice for the same appeal is erroneous Appellant
incurred a fee obligation by filling a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(e) (Upon filing a
notice of appeal, the appellant must pay the district clerk all required fees.).
He filed two
separate appeals (C.A. Nos. 15-3400 and 16-1149), and he incurred two fee obligations.
Moreover, we note that appellant suffered no monetary loss for his appeal at C.A. No. 15-3400 as
the Court granted his motion to voluntarily withdraw that appeal before his IFP motion was
considered or any fee remitted.
Even if we were to liberally construe appellant's filing as a motion to reopen, we would
deny it. Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R Misc. 107.2(a), a motion to set aside an order of dismissal for
failure to prosecute must be filed within 10 days from the date of dismissal and must be justified
by a showing of good cause.
Appellant's motion was not submitted until March 15, 2016 a
month after the dismissal order was entered. As such, his motion is clearly untimely. Additionally
the Appellant has failed to provide to the court an excuse for his untimely filing.
He simply
asserts that he wants the Court to do what it has already declined to do, that is reopen C.A. 153400. Accordingly, given appellant's dilatoriness and his failure to establish good cause for the
untimely filing, reopening is not warranted. By The Court.]
WHY DID THE COURT FAIL TO COMPLY WITH OR CONSIDER DOCKET ENTRY NO.
DECEMBER 31, 2015 - THE LETTER TO THE COURT REQUESTING TO RESCIND THE
MOTION TO DISMISS?
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page92
91
8 of 811
45
62
70
88
171
499
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page 93
DOCKETS
92 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
TABLE OF CONTENTS
12
OPINIONS BELOW ........................................................................................................ 1
13
JURISDICTION...................................................................................................................
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED .................................

14
STATEMENT OF THE CASE ............................................................................................
24
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT ..........................................................................
26
CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................
27
INDEX TO APPENDICES
APPENDIX A .............................................................................................................. 36
APPENDIX B ............................................................................................................... 41
APPENDIX C .............................................................................................................. 43
APPENDIX D .............................................................................................................. 47
APPENDIX E .............................................................................................................. 55
APPENDIX F .............................................................................................................. 60
APPENDIX G .............................................................................................................. 64
APPENDIX H .............................................................................................................. 71
APPENDIX I ............................................................................................................... 73
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page94
93
12of
10
of811
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED
CASES
Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 85 S.Ct. 1065, 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965);
PAGE NUMBER
Appendix B -
STATUTES AND RULES
OTHER
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page95
94
13of
11
of811
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
IN THE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below.
OPINIONS BELOW
[X] For cases from federal courts:
The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at Appendix
the petition and is
to
[ X] reported at U.S.C.A. THIRD CIRCUIT 16-1149 July 18, 2016

; or,
[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
The opinion of the United States district court appears at Appendix
the petition and is
to
[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
[ ] For cases from state courts:
The opinion of the highest state court to review the merits appears at
Appendix
to the petition and is
[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
The opinion of the
appears at Appendix
court
to the petition and is
[ ] reported at
; or,
[ ] is unpublished.
1.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page96
95
14of
12
of811
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
JURISDICTION
[ X] For cases from federal courts:

The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case
was June 15, 2016
.
[ ] No petition for rehearing was timely led in my case.
[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of
Appeals on the following date: July 18, 2015
, and a copy of the
A
order denying rehearing appears at Appendix
.
[ ] An extension of time to le the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted
to and including
(date) on
(date)
in Application No.
A
.
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. 1254(1).
[ ] For cases from state courts:

The date on which the highest state court decided my case was
A copy of that decision appears at Appendix
.
[ ] A timely petition for rehearing was thereafter denied on the following date:
, and a copy of the order denying rehearing
appears at Appendix
.
[ ] An extension of time to le the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted
to and including
(date) on
(date) in
Application No.
A
.
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. 1257(a).
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page97
96
15of
13
of811
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 (1965)
Supreme Court of the United States

Filed: April 5th, 1965
Precedential Status: Precedential
Citations: 380 U.S. 400, 85 S. Ct. 1065, 13 L. Ed. 2d 923, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1481
Docket Number: 577
Supreme Court Database ID: 1964-069
Judges: Black
Nature of suit: Unknown
380 U.S. 400 (1965)
POINTER
v.
TEXAS.
No. 577.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 15, 1965.
Decided April 5, 1965.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
Orville A. Harlan, by appointment of the Court, 379 U.S. 911, argued the cause and filed a brief
for petitioner.
Gilbert J. Pena, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, argued the cause for respondent. With him
on the brief were Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant
Attorney General, Stanton Stone, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender
and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.
The Sixth Amendment provides in part that:
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted
with the witnesses *401 against him . . . and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his
defence."
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page98
97
14of
of811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
Two years ago in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, we held that the Fourteenth Amendment
makes the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of right to counsel obligatory upon the States. The
question we find necessary to decide in this case is whether the Amendment's guarantee of a
defendant's right "to be confronted with the witnesses against him," which has been held to
include the right to cross-examine those witnesses, is also made applicable to the States by the
Fourteenth Amendment.
The petitioner Pointer and one Dillard were arrested in Texas and taken before a state judge for a
preliminary hearing (in Texas called the "examining trial") on a charge of having robbed Kenneth
W. Phillips of $375 "by assault, or violence, or by putting in fear of life or bodily injury," in
violation of Texas Penal Code Art. 1408. At this hearing an Assistant District Attorney conducted
the prosecution and examined witnesses, but neither of the defendants, both of whom were
laymen, had a lawyer. Phillips as chief witness for the State gave his version of the alleged
robbery in detail, identifying petitioner as the man who had robbed him at gunpoint. Apparently
Dillard tried to cross-examine Phillips but Pointer did not, although Pointer was said to have tried
to cross-examine some other witnesses at the hearing. Petitioner was subsequently indicted on a
charge of having committed the robbery. Some time before the trial was held, Phillips moved to
California. After putting in evidence to show that Phillips had moved and did not intend to return
to Texas, the State at the trial offered the transcript of Phillips' testimony given at the preliminary
hearing as evidence against petitioner. Petitioner's counsel immediately objected to introduction of
the transcript, stating, "Your Honor, we will object to that, as it is a denial of the confrontment of
the witnesses against the Defendant." *402 Similar objections were repeatedly made by
petitioner's counsel but were overruled by the trial judge, apparently in part because, as the judge
viewed it, petitioner had been present at the preliminary hearing and therefore had been
"accorded the opportunity of cross examining the witnesses there against him." The Texas Court
of Criminal Appeals, the highest state court to which the case could be taken, affirmed petitioner's
conviction, rejecting his contention that use of the transcript to convict him denied him rights
guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. 375 S.W.2d 293. We granted certiorari to
consider the important constitutional question the case involves. 379 U.S. 815.
In this Court we do not find it necessary to decide one aspect of the question petitioner raises,
that is, whether failure to appoint counsel to represent him at the preliminary hearing
unconstitutionally denied him the assistance of counsel within the meaning of Gideon v.
Wainwright, supra. In making that argument petitioner relies mainly on White v. Maryland, 373
U.S. 59, in which this Court reversed a conviction based in part upon evidence that the defendant
had pleaded guilty to the crime at a preliminary hearing where he was without counsel. Since the
preliminary hearing there, as in Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52, was one in which pleas to the
charge could be made, we held in White as in Hamilton that a preliminary proceeding of that
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETS Page
DOCKETS
Page99
98
15of
of811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
nature was so critical a stage in the prosecution that a defendant at that point was entitled to
counsel. But the State informs us that at a Texas preliminary hearing, such as is involved here,
pleas of guilty are not guilty are not accepted and that the judge decides only whether the
accused should be bound over to the grand jury and if so whether he should be admitted to bail.
Because of these significant differences in the procedures of the respective States, we cannot say
that the White case is necessarily controlling *403 as to the right to counsel. Whether there might
be other circumstances making this Texas preliminary hearing so critical to the defendant as to
call for appointment of counsel at that stage we need not decide on this record, and that question
we reserve. In this case the objections and arguments in the trial court as well as the arguments
in the Court of Criminal Appeals and before us make it clear that petitioner's objection is based
not so much on the fact that he had no lawyer when Phillips made his statement at the
preliminary hearing, as on the fact that use of the transcript of that statement at the trial denied
petitioner any opportunity to have the benefit of counsel's cross-examination of the principal
witness against him. It is that latter question which we decide here.
I.
The Sixth Amendment is a part of what is called our Bill of Rights. In Gideon v. Wainwright, supra,
in which this Court held that the Sixth Amendment's right to the assistance of counsel is
obligatory upon the States, we did so on the ground that "a provision of the Bill of Rights which is
`fundamental and essential to a fair trial' is made obligatory upon the States by the Fourteenth
Amendment." 372 U. S., at 342. And last Term in Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, in holding that the
Fifth Amendment's guarantee against self-incrimination was made applicable to the States by the
Fourteenth, we reiterated the holding of Gideon that the Sixth Amendment's right-to-counsel
guarantee is " à fundamental right, essential to a fair trial,' " and "thus was made obligatory on
the States by the Fourteenth Amendment." 378 U. S., at 6. See also Murphy v. Waterfront
Comm'n, 378 U.S. 52. We hold today that the Sixth Amendment's right of an accused to confront
the witnesses against him is likewise a fundamental right and is made obligatory on the States by
the Fourteenth Amendment.
*404 It cannot seriously be doubted at this late date that the right of cross-examination is
included in the right of an accused in a criminal case to confront the witnesses against him. And
probably no one, certainly no one experienced in the trial of lawsuits, would deny the value of
cross-examination in exposing falsehood and bringing out the truth in the trial of a criminal case.
See, e. g., 5 Wigmore, Evidence 1367 (3d ed. 1940). The fact that this right appears in the
Sixth Amendment of our Bill of Rights reflects the belief of the Framers of those liberties and
safeguards that confrontation was a fundamental right essential to a fair trial in a criminal
prosecution. Moreover, the decisions of this Court and other courts [*] throughout the years have
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page
Page100
99
16of
of171
499
811
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
constantly emphasized the necessity for cross-examination as a protection for defendants in

criminal cases. This Court in Kirby v. United States, 174 U.S. 47, 55, 56, referred to the right of
confrontation as "[o]ne of the fundamental guarantees of life and liberty," and "a right long
deemed so essential for the due protection of life and liberty that it is guarded against legislative
and judicial action by provisions in the Constitution of the United States and in the constitutions of
most if not of all the States composing the Union." Mr. Justice Stone, writing for the Court in
Alford v. United States, 282 U.S. 687, 692, declared that the right of cross-examination is "one of
the safeguards essential to a fair trial." And in speaking of confrontation and cross-examination
this Court said in Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474:
"They have ancient roots. They find expression in the Sixth Amendment which provides
that in all *405 criminal cases the accused shall enjoy the right `to be confronted with
the witnesses against him.' This Court has been zealous to protect these rights from
erosion." 360 U. S., at 496-497 (footnote omitted).
There are few subjects, perhaps, upon which this Court and other courts have been more nearly
unanimous than in their expressions of belief that the right of confrontation and cross-examination
is an essential and fundamental requirement for the kind of fair trial which is this country's
constitutional goal. Indeed, we have expressly declared that to deprive an accused of the right to
cross-examine the witnesses against him is a denial of the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of
due process of law. In In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, this Court said:
"A person's right to reasonable notice of a charge against him, and an opportunity to
be heard in his defensea right to his day in courtare basic in our system of
jurisprudence; and these rights include, as a minimum, a right to examine the
witnesses against him, to offer testimony, and to be represented by counsel." 333 U.
S., at 273 (footnote omitted).
And earlier this Term in Turner v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 466, 472-473, we held:
"In the constitutional sense, trial by jury in a criminal case necessarily implies at the
very least that the èvidence developed' against a defendant shall come from the
witness stand in a public courtroom where there is full judicial protection of the
defendant's right of confrontation, of cross-examination, and of counsel."
Compare Willner v. Committee on Character & Fitness, 373 U.S. 96, 103-104.
*406 We are aware that some cases, particularly West v. Louisiana, 194 U.S. 258, 264, have
stated that the Sixth Amendment's right of confrontation does not apply to trials in state courts,
on the ground that the entire Sixth Amendment does not so apply. See also Stein v. New York,
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page101
100
17 of 811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
346 U.S. 156, 195-196. But of course since Gideon v. Wainwright, supra, it no longer can broadly
be said that the Sixth Amendment does not apply to state courts. And as this Court said in Malloy
v. Hogan, supra, "The Court has not hesitated to re-examine past decisions according the
Fourteenth Amendment a less central role in the preservation of basic liberties than that which
was contemplated by its Framers when they added the Amendment to our constitutional scheme."
378 U. S., at 5. In the light of Gideon, Malloy, and other cases cited in those opinions holding
various provisions of the Bill of Rights applicable to the States by virtue of the Fourteenth
Amendment, the statements made in West and similar cases generally declaring that the Sixth
Amendment does not apply to the States can no longer be regarded as the law. We hold that
petitioner was entitled to be tried in accordance with the protection of the confrontation guarantee
of the Sixth Amendment, and that that guarantee, like the right against compelled selfincrimination, is "to be enforced against the States under the Fourteenth Amendment according to
the same standards that protect those personal rights against federal encroachment." Malloy v.
Hogan, supra, 378 U. S., at 10.
II.
Under this Court's prior decisions, the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of confrontation and crossexamination was unquestionably denied petitioner in this case. As has been pointed out, a major
reason underlying the *407 constitutional confrontation rule is to give a defendant charged with
crime an opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses against him. See, e. g., Dowdell v. United
States, 221 U.S. 325, 330; Motes v. United States, 178 U.S. 458, 474; Kirby v. United States, 174
U.S. 47, 55-56; Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 242-243. Cf. Hopt v. Utah, 110 U.S. 574,
581; Queen v. Hepburn, 7 Cranch 290, 295. This Court has recognized the admissibility against an
accused of dying declarations, Mattox v. United States, 146 U.S. 140, 151, and of testimony of a
deceased witness who has testified at a former trial, Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 240244. See also Dowdell v. United States, supra, 221 U. S., at 330; Kirby v. United States, supra,
174 U. S., at 61. Nothing we hold here is to the contrary. The case before us would be quite a
different one had Phillips' statement been taken at a full-fledged hearing at which petitioner had
been represented by counsel who had been given a complete and adequate opportunity to crossexamine. Compare Motes v. United States, supra, 178 U. S., at 474. There are other analogous
situations which might not fall within the scope of the constitutional rule requiring confrontation of
witnesses. The case before us, however, does not present any situation like those mentioned
above or others analogous to them. Because the transcript of Phillips' statement offered against
petitioner at his trial had not been taken at a time and under circumstances affording petitioner
through counsel an adequate opportunity to cross-examine Phillips, its introduction in a federal
court in a criminal case against Pointer would have amounted to denial of the privilege of
confrontation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Since we hold that the right of an accused to
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page102
101
18 of 811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
be confronted with the witnesses against him must be determined by the same standards whether
the right is denied in a federal or state proceeding, *408 it follows that use of the transcript to
convict petitioner denied him a constitutional right, and that his conviction must be reversed.
Reversed and remanded.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, concurring in the result.
I agree that in the circumstances the admission of the statement in question deprived the
petitioner of a right of "confrontation" assured by the Fourteenth Amendment. I cannot subscribe,
however, to the constitutional reasoning of the Court.
The Court holds that the right of confrontation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment in federal
criminal trials is carried into state criminal cases by the Fourteenth Amendment. This is another
step in the onward march of the long-since discredited "incorporation" doctrine (see, e. g.,
Fairman, Does the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill of Rights? The Original
Understanding, 2 Stan. L. Rev. 5 (1949); Frankfurter, Memorandum on "Incorporation" of the Bill
of Rights Into the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, 78 Harv. L. Rev. 746
(1965)), which for some reason that I have not yet been able to fathom has come into the
sunlight in recent years. See, e. g., Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643; Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23;
Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1.
For me this state judgment must be reversed because a right of confrontation is "implicit in the
concept of ordered liberty," Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 325, reflected in the Due Process
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment independently of the Sixth.
While either of these constitutional approaches brings one to the same end result in this particular
case, there is a basic difference between the two in the kind of future constitutional development
they portend. The concept of Fourteenth Amendment due process embodied in Palko *409 and a
host of other thoughtful past decisions now rapidly falling into discard, recognizes that our
Constitution tolerates, indeed encourages, differences between the methods used to effectuate
legitimate federal and state concerns, subject to the requirements of fundamental fairness
"implicit in the concept of ordered liberty." The philosophy of "incorporation," on the other hand,
subordinates all such state differences to the particular requirements of the Federal Bill of Rights
(but see Ker v. California, supra, at 34) and increasingly subjects state legal processes to
enveloping federal judicial authority. "Selective" incorporation or "absorption" amounts to little
more than a diluted form of the full incorporation theory. Whereas it rejects full incorporation
because of recognition that not all of the guarantees of the Bill of Rights should be deemed
"fundamental," it at the same time ignores the possibility that not all phases of any given
guaranty described in the Bill of Rights are necessarily fundamental.
It is too often forgotten in these times that the American federal system is itself constitutionally
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page103
102
19 of 811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
ordained, that it embodies values profoundly making for lasting liberties in this country, and that
its legitimate requirements demand continuing solid recognition in all phases of the work of this
Court. The "incorporation" doctrines, whether full blown or selective, are both historically and
constitutionally unsound and incompatible with the maintenance of our federal system on even
course.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART, concurring in the result.
I join in the judgment reversing this conviction, for the reason that the petitioner was denied the
opportunity to cross-examine, through counsel, the chief witness for the prosecution. But I do not
join in the Court's pronouncement which makes "the Sixth Amendment's right of an accused to
confront the witnesses against him . . . obligatory *410 on the States." That questionable tour de
force seems to me entirely unnecessary to the decision of this case, which I think is directly
controlled by the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee that no State shall "deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."
The right of defense counsel in a criminal case to cross-examine the prosecutor's living witnesses
is "[o]ne of the fundamental guarantees of life and liberty,"[1] and "one of the safeguards
essential to a fair trial."[2] It is, I think, as indispensable an ingredient as the "right to be tried in
a courtroom presided over by a judge."[3] Indeed, this Court has said so this very Term. Turner v.
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 466, 472-473.[4]
Here that right was completely denied. Therefore, as the Court correctly points out, we need not
consider the case which could be presented if Phillips' statement had been taken at a hearing at
which the petitioner's counsel was given a full opportunity to cross-examine. See West v.
Louisiana, 194 U.S. 258.
MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG, concurring.
I agree with the holding of the Court that "the Sixth Amendment's right of an accused to confront
the witnesses against him is . . . a fundamental right and is made obligatory on the States by the
Fourteenth Amendment." Ante, at 403. I therefore join in the opinion and judgment of the Court.
My Brother HARLAN, while agreeing with the result reached by the Court, deplores the Court's
*411 reasoning as "another step in the onward march of the long-since discredited ìncorporation'
doctrine," ante, at 408. Since I was not on the Court when the incorporation issue was joined, see
Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46, I deem it appropriate to set forth briefly my view on this
subject.
I need not recapitulate the arguments for or against incorporation whether "total" or "selective."
They have been set forth adequately elsewhere.[1] My Brother BLACK'S view of incorporation has
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page104
103
20 of 811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
never commanded a majority of the Court, though in Adamson it was assented to by four Justices.
The Court in its decisions has followed a course whereby certain guarantees "have been taken
over from the earlier articles of the federal bill of rights and brought within the Fourteenth
Amendment," Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 326, by a process which might aptly be
described as "a process of absorption." Ibid. See Cohen v. Hurley, 366 U.S. 117, 154 (dissenting
opinion of MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN); Brennan, The Bill of Rights and the States, 36 N. Y. U. L. Rev.
761 (1961). Thus the Court has held that the Fourteenth *412 Amendment guarantees against
infringement by the States the liberties of the First Amendment,[2] the Fourth Amendment,[3]
the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment,[4] the Fifth Amendment's privilege against
self-incrimination,[5] the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments,[6]
and the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of the assistance of counsel for an accused in a criminal
prosecution.[7]
With all deference to my Brother HARLAN, I cannot agree that this process has "come into the
sunlight in recent years." Ante, at 408. Rather, I believe that it has its origins at least as far back
as Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78, 99, where the Court stated that "it is possible that some of
the personal rights safeguarded by the first eight Amendments against National action may also
be safeguarded against state action, because a denial of them would be a denial of due process of
law. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226." This passage and the
authority cited make clear that what is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment are "rights,"
which apply in every case, not solely in those cases where it seems "fair" to a majority of the
Court to afford the protection. Later cases reaffirm that the process of "absorption" is one of
extending "rights." See Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23; Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1, and cases
cited by MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN in his dissenting opinion in Cohen v. Hurley, supra, at 156. I
agree with these decisions, as is apparent from my votes in *413 Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S.
335; Malloy v. Hogan, supra, and Murphy v. Waterfront Comm'n, 378 U.S. 52, and my concurring
opinion in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 297, and I subscribe to the process by
which fundamental guarantees of the Bill of Rights are absorbed by the Fourteenth Amendment
and thereby applied to the States.
Furthermore, I do not agree with my Brother HARLAN that once a provision of the Bill of Rights
has been held applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, it does not apply to the
States in full strength. Such a view would have the Fourteenth Amendment apply to the States
"only a `watered-down, subjective version of the individual guarantees of the Bill of Rights.' "
Malloy v. Hogan, supra, at 10-11. It would allow the States greater latitude than the Federal
Government to abridge concededly fundamental liberties protected by the Constitution. While I
quite agree with Mr. Justice Brandeis that "[i]t is one of the happy incidents of the federal system
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page105
104
21 of 811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
that a . . . State may . . . serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments,"
New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, 280, 311 (dissenting opinion), I do not believe that
this includes the power to experiment with the fundamental liberties of citizens safeguarded by
the Bill of Rights. My Brother HARLAN'S view would also require this Court to make the extremely
subjective and excessively discretionary determination as to whether a practice, forbidden the
Federal Government by a fundamental constitutional guarantee, is, as viewed in the factual
circumstances surrounding each individual case, sufficiently repugnant to the notion of due
process as to be forbidden the States.
Finally, I do not see that my Brother HARLAN'S view would further any legitimate interests of
federalism. It would require this Court to intervene in the state judicial process with considerable
lack of predictability and with *414 a consequent likelihood of considerable friction. This is well
illustrated by the difficulties which were faced and were articulated by the state courts attempting
to apply this Court's now discarded rule of Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455. See Green, The Bill of
Rights, the Fourteenth Amendment and the Supreme Court, 46 Mich. L. Rev. 869, 897-898. These
difficulties led the Attorneys General of 22 States to urge that this Court overrule Betts v. Brady
and apply fully the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of right to counsel to the States through the
Fourteenth Amendment. See Gideon v. Wainwright, supra, at 336. And, to deny to the States the
power to impair a fundamental constitutional right is not to increase federal power, but, rather, to
limit the power of both federal and state governments in favor of safeguarding the fundamental
rights and liberties of the individual. In my view this promotes rather than undermines the basic
policy of avoiding excess concentration of power in government, federal or state, which underlines
our concepts of federalism.
I adhere to and support the process of absorption by means of which the Court holds that certain
fundamental guarantees of the Bill of Rights are made obligatory on the States through the
Fourteenth Amendment. Although, as this case illustrates, there are differences among members
of the Court as to the theory by which the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental
liberties of individual citizens, it is noteworthy that there is a large area of agreement, both here
and in other cases, that certain basic rights are fundamentalnot to be denied the individual by
either the state or federal governments under the Constitution. See, e. g., Cantwell v.
Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296; NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449; Gideon v.
Wainwright, supra; New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, supra; Turner v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 466.
NOTES
[*] See state and English cases collected in 5 Wigmore, Evidence 1367, 1395 (3d ed. 1940).
State constitutional and statutory provisions similar to the Sixth Amendment are collected in 5
Wigmore, supra, 1397, n. 1.
[1] Kirby v. United States, 174 U.S. 47, 55.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page106
105
22 of 811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
[2] Alford v. United States, 282 U.S. 687, 692.

[3] Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. 723, 727.
[4] See also In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, where the Court said that "due process requires as a
minimum that an accused be given a public trial after reasonable notice of the charges, have a
right to examine witness against him, call witnesses on his own behalf, and be represented by
counsel." 349 U. S., at 134.
[1] See Adamson v. California, supra, at 59 (concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Frankfurter); id., at
68 (dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE BLACK); Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1; id., at 14 (dissenting
opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 345 (concurring opinion of
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS); id., at 349 (concurring opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN); Poe v. Ullman,
367 U.S. 497, 509 (dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS); Frankfurter, Memorandum on
"Incorporation" of the Bill of Rights Into the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, 78
Harv. L. Rev. 746; Black, The Bill of Rights, 35 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 865 (1960); Brennan, The Bill of
Rights and the States, 36 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 761 (1961); Fairman, Does the Fourteenth Amendment
Incorporate the Bill of Rights? The Original Understanding, 2 Stan. L. Rev. 5 (1949); Green, The
Bill of Rights, the Fourteenth Amendment and the Supreme Court, 46 Mich. L. Rev. 869 (1948);
Henkin, "Selective Incorporation" in the Fourteenth Amendment, 73 Yale L. J. 74 (1963).
[2] See, e. g., Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652, 666; De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353, 364;
Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303; Louisiana ex rel. Gremillion v. NAACP, 366 U.S. 293,
296; New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254.
[3] See Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25; Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643.
[4] Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226.
[5] Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1.
[6] Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660.
[7] Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page107
106
23 of 811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On June 23, 2015 APPELLANT, Stanley J. Caterbone, filed an Amicus Curei Brief in the U.S.
District Court Case No. 14-02559 in PETITIONER LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT'S HABEUS CORPUS,
which was originally filed on May 14, 2014. On September 2, 2015 APPELLANT filed a MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT.
On September 14, 2015 U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond
ORDERED that Mr. Caterbones Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 8, 9) and
Motions to File Exhibits or Statements (Doc. Nos. 10, 11, 12, 14) are DENIED as
frivolous. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Stanley J. Caterbone may no longer submit
filingswhether electronic or in paper formatin the above-captioned case. The Clerk
shall not docket any such filings without my approval.
On September 30, 2015 APPELLANT filed an APPEAL to U.S.C.A. To the Third Circuit Case
No. 15-3400. On November 24, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone FILED a Motion for a 30 Day Extension
of Time, which was GRANTED. On December 14, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone FILED a LETTER to
the Clerk requesting to WITHDRAW appeal no. 15-3400 in the Third Circuit due among other
things the APPELLANT'S computer was taken by the GEEK SQUAD, whom refused to return it. On
December 17, 2015 APPELLANT FILED a LETTER to the Clerk CLARIFYING the Withdraw as a
MOTION to WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
On December 31, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone
FILED a LETTER to the COURT RESCINDING his MOTION TO WITHDRAW.1

On January 12, 2016 FISHER, JORDAN and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges, ISSUED AN ORDER
in Case No. 15-3400 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED.2 On January 12, 2016 FISHER, JORDAN
and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges, ISSUED AN ORDER in Case No. 15-3400 MOTION TO WITHDRAW
GRANTED.3 On January 13, 2016 Stanley J. Caterbone FILED a MOTION TO REINSTATE the Appeal
in the Third Circuit.
On January 15, 2016 (FISHER, JORDAN and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges
ISSUED AN ORDER DENIED MOTION TO REINSTATE the Appeal in the Third Circuit. On January
17, 2015 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Case No.
14-02559 APPELLANT FILED a NOTICE OF APPEAL and U.S District Court, 14-02559, January 17,
2015 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Case No. 1402559 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 25 Notice of Appeal : (jpd, ) (Entered: 01/20/2016). On January
1
The Letter to Rescind was either hidden from FISHER, JORDAN and VANASKIE or FISHER, JORDAN and VANASKIE
ignored the Letter to Rescind. This would have preserved the entire Record of Case No. 15-3400 including EXHIBITS,
MOTIONS, ETC.,.
2
This DELETED AND REMOVED FROM THE PUBLIC DOMAIN and from DELIBERATIONS the entire the Record of Case No.
15-3400 including EXHIBITS, MOTIONS, ETC., which SUPPORTS AND PROVIDES EVIDENCE FOR AFFIRMATION OF THE
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT in Case No. 14-02559 and a FAVORABLE Ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals for the Complainant, and Pro Se Appellant.
3
This DELETED AND REMOVED FROM THE PUBLIC DOMAIN and from DELIBERATIONS the entire the Record of Case No.
15-3400 including EXHIBITS, MOTIONS, ETC., which SUPPORTS AND PROVIDES EVIDENCE FOR AFFIRMATION OF THE
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT in Case No. 14-02559 and a FAVORABLE Ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals for the Complainant, and Pro Se Appellant.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page108
107
24 of 811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
22, 2016 in the U.S. THIRD CIRCUIT Clerk Issues New Docket No. 16-1149.
On February 16, 2016 the Clerk ORDERED the APPEAL dismissed due to F.R.A.P. (3) a and
FRAP 3.3 and Misc 107.1(a) for failure to pay the filing fee for the Notice of Appeal. On March 15,
2016 APPELLANT filed a Motion for Reconsideration and finally on July 28, 2016 Judges Chargaras,
Jordan, and Venaskie ORDERED The foregoing motion for reconsideration of the Clerk's
Order is construed as a motion to review that order and is denied as meritless.
The
Clerk has the authority under 3d Cir. LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a) to dismiss an appeal
for failure to satisfy the fee requirement.
It is clear that the omission for considerations the Letter of December 31, 2015 instructing
the COURTS to rescind the Motion to Withdraw was a clear violation of APPELLANT'S right to due
process and right to appeal that set in motion filings and decisions which should be considered as
MOOT to the original APPEAL. The APPELLANT wishes the COURT to reverse this obstruction of
justice.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page109
108
25 of 811
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION

It is clear that the omission for considerations of the Letter of December 31, 2015
instructing the COURTS to rescind the Motion to Withdraw was a clear violation of APPELLANT'S
right to due process and right to appeal that set in motion filings and decisions which should be
considered as MOOT to the original APPEAL. The APPELLANT wishes the COURT to reverse this
obstruction of justice.
That being said there is a broader issue that is woven through the history of this
unprecedented case starting; with the original HABEUS CORPUS written and filed by PETITIONER
Lisa Michelle Lambert in 1997, the findings of U.S. District Judge Stewert Dalzall's that this case
contained one of the worst cases of prosecutorial misconduct in the English speaking language
and releasing Lisa Michelle Lambert from prison;
wrongdoings in this case.
and ultimately the contamination of
This again is another case of JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT and
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT at the WORST or a case of ERRORS and OMMISSIONS at best

regarding the adjudication of the APPELLANT'S original Amicus Curie Brief and Motion for
Summary Judgment in PETITIONER'S Lisa Michelle Lambert's Habeus Corpus of May of 2014.
This case was of national importance and received national attention immediately following
the findings of U.S. District Judge Stewert Dalzall and the release of Lisa Michelle Lambert from
prison in 1997.
A&E TV did a documentary, which aired on national television titled American
Justice: A Teenage Murder Mystery and also sells the DVD online today. See Appendix H. The LA
Times published a 3-part series beginning on November 10, 1997 by Journalist Barry Seigel. See
Appendix I.
It is in the public's best interest to restore integrity to the COURTS and to the Prosecutors
and Judges and the COURTS that are honest and fair;
and provide the means to which Lisa
Michelle Lambert's meritorious plight for RELIEF and RELEASE from Prison can then be
accomplished, as it should.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page110
109
26 of 811
171
499
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 111
110 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Stan Caterbone
LOCAL,
STATE, FEDERAL
& FEDERAL
COURT
COURT
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 112
111 of 811
171
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
PROOF OF SERVICE
Mr. Craig Stedman,

Lancaster County District Attorney
50 N. Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Mr. XXXXXXXXX
Doug Behmer,Bruce Beemer
Pennsylvania State Attorney General
16th Floor Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Ibrahim, Jeremy
Ibrahim Jeremy Attorney
1700 Race St
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: (215) 568-1943
Lisa Michelle Lambert /Superintendant
MCI - Framingham
P.O. Box 9007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xx 01704
Framingham,
PA
Framingham, MA 01704
The Honorable Paul S. Diamond

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page113
112
29 of 811
171
499
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
October 2015
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20543
GUIDE FOR PROSPECTIVE INDIGENT PETITIONERS FOR WRITS OF
CERTIORARI
I. Introduction
These instructions and forms are designed to assist petitioners who are proceeding in
forma pauperis and without the assistance of counsel. A copy of the Rules of the
Supreme Court, which establish the procedures that must be followed, is also enclosed.
Be sure to read the following Rules carefully:
Rules 10-14 (Petitioning for certiorari)
Rule 29 (Filing and service on opposing party or counsel)
Rule 30 (Computation and extension of time)
Rules 33.2 and 34 (Preparing pleadings on 812 x 11 inch paper)
Rule 39 (Proceedings in forma pauperis)
II. Nature of Supreme Court Review

It is important to note that review in this Court by means of a writ of certiorari is not
a matter of right, but of judicial discretion. The primary concern of the Supreme
Court is not to correct errors in lower court decisions, but to decide cases presenting
issues of importance beyond the particular facts and parties involved. The Court
grants and hears argument in only about 1% of the cases that are led each Term.
The vast majority of petitions are simply denied by the Court without comment or
explanation. The denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari signies only that the
Court has chosen not to accept the case for review and does not express the Courts
view of the merits of the case.
Every petitioner for a writ of certiorari is advised to read carefully the Considerations
Governing Review on Certiorari set forth in Rule 10. Important considerations for
accepting a case for review include the existence of a conict between the decision of
which review is sought and a decision of another appellate court on the same issue.
An important function of the Supreme Court is to resolve disagreements among lower
courts about specic legal questions. Another consideration is the importance to the
public of the issue.
III. The Time for Filing
You must le your petition for a writ of certiorari within 90 days from the date of the
entry of the nal judgment in the United States court of appeals or highest state
appellate court or 90 days from the denial of a timely led petition for rehearing. The
issuance of a mandate or remittitur after judgment has been entered has no bearing
on the computation of time and does not extend the time for ling. See Rules 13.1 and
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page114
113
21 of 811
29
30
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
13.3. Filing in the Supreme Court means the actual receipt of documents by the Clerk;
or their deposit in the United States mail, with rst-class postage prepaid, on or before
the nal date allowed for ling; or their delivery to a third-party commercial carrier,
on or before the nal date allowed for ling, for delivery to the Clerk within 3 calendar
days. See Rule 29.2.
IV. What To File
Unless you are an inmate conned in an institution and not represented by counsel,
le:
An original and ten copies of a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
an original and 10 copies of an afdavit or declaration in support thereof. See Rule 39.
An original and 10 copies of a petition for a writ of certiorari with an appendix
consisting of a copy of the judgment or decree you are asking this Court to review
including any order on rehearing, and copies of any opinions or orders by any courts or
administrative agencies that have previously considered your case. See Rule 14.1(i).
One afdavit or declaration showing that all opposing parties or their counsel have
been served with a copy of the papers led in this Court. See Rule 29.
If you are an inmate conned in an institution and not represented by counsel, you need
le only the original of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, afdavit or
declaration when needed in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pau
peris, the petition for a writ of certiorari, and proof of service.
If the court below appointed counsel in the current proceeding, no afdavit or declara
tion is required, but the motion should cite the provision of law under which counsel
was appointed, or a copy of the order of appointment should be appended to the motion.
See Rule 39.1.
The attached forms may be used for the original motion, afdavit or declaration, and
petition, and should be stapled together in that order. The proof of service should be
included as a detached sheet, and the form provided may be used.
V. Page Limitation
The petition for a writ of certiorari may not exceed 40 pages excluding the pages that
precede Page 1 of the form. The documents required to be contained in the appendix
to the petition do not count toward the page limit. See Rule 33.2(b).
VI. Method of Filing

All documents to be led in this Court must be addressed to the Clerk, Supreme Court
of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543 and must be served on opposing parties
or their counsel in accordance with Rule 29.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page115
114
22 of 811
30
31
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING FORMS
I.
Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - Rule 39

A. On the form provided for the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis,
leave the case number blank. The number will be assigned by the Clerk when
the case is docketed.
B. On the line in the case caption for petitioner, type your name. As a pro
se petitioner, you may represent only yourself. On the line for respondent,
type the name of the opposing party in the lower court. If there are multiple
respondents, enter the rst respondent, as the name appeared on the lower court
decision, followed by et al. to indicate that there are other respondents. The
additional parties must be listed in the LIST OF PARTIES section of the
petition.
C. If the lower courts in your case granted you leave to proceed in forma pau
peris, check the appropriate space and indicate the court or courts that allowed
you to proceed in forma pauperis. If none of the lower courts granted you
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, check the block that so indicates.
D. Sign the motion on the signature line.
II. Afdavit or Declaration in Support of Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma

Pauperis
On the form provided, answer fully each of the questions. If the answer to a question
is 0, none, or not applicable (N/A), enter that response. If you need more space
to answer a question or to explain your answer, attach a separate sheet of paper,
identied with your name and the question number. Unless each question is fully
answered, the Clerk will not accept the petition. The form must either be notarized
or be in the form of a declaration. See 28 U. S. C. 1746.
III. Cover Page - Rule 34
When you complete the form for the cover page:
A. Leave case number blank. The number will be assigned by the Clerk when
the case is docketed.
B. Complete the case caption as you did on the motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis.
C. List the court from which the action is brought on the line following the
words on petition for a writ of certiorari to. If your case is from a state court,
enter the name of the court that last addressed the merits of the case. For
example, if the highest state court denied discretionary review, and the state
court of appeals afrmed the decision of the trial court, the state court of
appeals should be listed. If your case is federal, the United States court of
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page116
115
23 of 811
31
32
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
appeals that decided your case will always be listed here.

D. Enter your name, address, and telephone number in the appropriate spaces.
IV. Question(s) Presented
On the page provided, enter the question or questions that you wish the Court to
review. The questions must be concise. Questions presented in cases accepted for
review are usually no longer than two or three sentences. The purpose of the question
presented is to assist the Court in selecting cases. State the issue you wish the Court
to decide clearly and without unnecessary detail.
V. List of Parties
On the page provided, check either the box indicating that the names of all parties
appear in the caption of the case on the cover page or the box indicating that there are
additional parties. If there are additional parties, list them. Rule 12.6 states that all
parties to the proceeding whose judgment is sought to be reviewed shall be deemed
parties in this Court, and that all parties other than petitioner shall be respondents.
The court whose judgment you seek to have this Court review is not a party.
VI. Table of Contents
On the page provided, list the page numbers on which the required portions of the
petition appear. Number the pages consecutively, beginning with the Opinions
Below page as page 1.
VII. Index of Appendices
List the description of each document that is included in the appendix beside the appro
priate appendix letter. Mark the bottom of the rst page of each appendix with the
appropriate designation, e.g., Appendix A. See Rule 14.1 pertaining to the items to
be included in the appendix.
A. Federal Courts
If you are asking the Court to review a decision of a federal court, the decision
of the United States court of appeals should be designated Appendix A.
Appendix A should be followed by the decision of the United States District
Court and the ndings and recommendations of the United States magistrate
judge, if there were any. If the United States court of appeals denied a timely
led petition for rehearing, a copy of that order should be appended next. If
you are seeking review of a decision in a habeas corpus case, and the decision of
either the United States District Court or the United States Court of Appeals
makes reference to a state court decision in which you were a party, a copy of
the state court decision must be included in the appendix.
B. State Courts
If you are asking the Court to review a decision of a state court, the decision of
which review is sought should be designated Appendix A. Appendix A should
be followed by the decision of the lower court or agency that was reviewed in
the decision designated Appendix A. If the highest court of the state in which a
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page117
116
24 of 811
32
33
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
decision could be had denied discretionary review, a copy of that order should
follow. If an order denying a timely led petition for rehearing starts the run
ning of the time for ling a petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 13.3,
a copy of the order should be appended next.
As an example, if the state trial court ruled against you, the intermediate court
of appeals afrmed the decision of the trial court, the state supreme court denied
discretionary review and then denied a timely petition for rehearing, the appen
dices should appear in the following order:
Appendix A Decision of State Court of Appeals
Appendix B Decision of State Trial Court
Appendix C Decision of State Supreme Court Denying Review
Appendix D Order of State Supreme Court Denying Rehearing
VIII. Table of Authorities

On the page provided, list the cases, statutes, treatises, and articles that you reference
in your petition, and the page number of your petition where each authority appears.
IX. Opinions Below
In the space provided, indicate whether the opinions of the lower courts in your case
have been published, and if so, the citation for the opinion below. For example, opin
ions of the United States courts of appeals are published in the Federal Reporter. If
the opinion in your case appears at page 100 of volume 30 of the Federal Reporter,
Third Series, indicate that the opinion is reported at 30 F. 3d 100. If the opinion has
been designated for publication but has not yet been published, check the appropriate
space. Also indicate where in the appendix each decision, reported or unreported,
appears.
X. Jurisdiction
The purpose of the jurisdiction section of the petition is to establish the statutory
source for the Courts jurisdiction and the dates that determine whether the petition
is timely led. The form sets out the pertinent statutes for federal and state cases.
You need provide only the dates of the lower court decisions that establish the timeli
ness of the petition for a writ of certiorari. If an extension of time within which to
le the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted, you must provide the requested
information pertaining to the extension. If you seek to have the Court review a deci
sion of a state court, you must provide the date the highest state court decided your
case, either by ruling on the merits or denying discretionary review.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page118
117
25 of 811
33
34
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
XI. Constitutional and Statutory Provisions Involved

Set out verbatim the constitutional provisions, treaties, statutes, ordinances and regu
lations involved in the case. If the provisions involved are lengthy, provide their cita
tion and indicate where in the Appendix to the petition the text of the provisions
appears.
XII. Statement of the Case
Provide a concise statement of the case containing the facts material to the consider
ation of the question(s) presented; you should summarize the relevant facts of the case
and the proceedings that took place in the lower courts. You may need to attach
additional pages, but the statement should be concise and limited to the relevant facts
of the case.
XIII. Reasons for Granting the Petition
The purpose of this section of the petition is to explain to the Court why it should
grant certiorari. It is important to read Rule 10 and address what compelling reasons
exist for the exercise of the Courts discretionary jurisdiction. Try to show not only
why the decision of the lower court may be erroneous, but the national importance of
having the Supreme Court decide the question involved. It is important to show
whether the decision of the court that decided your case is in conict with the decisions
of another appellate court; the importance of the case not only to you but to others
similarly situated; and the ways the decision of the lower court in your case was errone
ous. You will need to attach additional pages, but the reasons should be as concise as
possible, consistent with the purpose of this section of the petition.
XIV. Conclusion
Enter your name and the date that you submit the petition.
XV. Proof of Service
You must serve a copy of your petition on counsel for respondent(s) as required by
Rule 29. If you serve the petition by rst-class mail or by third-party commercial
carrier, you may use the enclosed proof of service form. If the United States or any
department, ofce, agency, ofcer, or employee thereof is a party, you must serve the
Solicitor General of the United States, Room 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsyl
vania Ave., N.W., Washington, D. C. 205300001. The lower courts that ruled on your
case are not parties and need not be served with a copy of the petition. The proof of
service may be in the form of a declaration pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 1746.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page119
118
26 of 811
34
35
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
APPENDIX A
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page120
119
36 of 811
171
499
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
COPY
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page121
120
27 of 811
35
37
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page122
121
28 of 811
36
38
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page123
122
29 of 811
37
39
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page124
123
30 of 811
38
40
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
APPENDIX B
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page125
124
41 of 811
171
499
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112168218
Page:
1 Stan
DateMedia
12/31/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
J.Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
December 31, 2015

To:
United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Clerk of Courts
Re:
Case No. 15-3400 Lambert Appeal

Motion to Dismiss of December 14, 2015
RESCIND MOTION TO DISMISS
Dear Clerk of Court:

Unfortunately there have been many developments regarding my issues in
the courts, including the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, the Pennsylvania
Superior Court, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and of
course the U.S.C.A.
There have also been a fluid and horrendous amount of
computer and electronic hacking attacks upon my electronics, including my

computers. Since I filed my motion to dismiss there have also been developments in
the Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane scandal that directly involves
myself and my issues. In addition, on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 I was able to
take back possession of my new Lenovo Laptop and have been able to file
electronically in the ECF system.
IMPORTANT
Accordingly, I wish to rescind my MOTION TO DISMISS and would ask that if
you require a Motion to contact me as soon as possible.
/S/
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se APPELLANT
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page126
125
31 of 811
39
42
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
APPENDIX C
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page127
126
43 of 811
171
499
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page128
127
32 of 811
40
44
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page129
128
33 of 811
41
45
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page130
129
34 of 811
42
46
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
APPENDIX D
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page131
130
47 of 811
171
499
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page132
131
35 of 811
43
48
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page133
132
36 of 811
44
49
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page134
133
37 of 811
45
50
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page135
134
38 of 811
46
51
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page136
135
39 of 811
47
52
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page137
136
40 of 811
48
53
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page138
137
41 of 811
49
54
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
APPENDIX E
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page139
138
55 of 811
171
499
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page140
139
42 of 811
50
56
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page141
140
43 of 811
51
57
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page142
141
44 of 811
52
58
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro Se
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page143
142
45 of 811
53
59
171
499
45
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
Sunday
November
October
October12,
10,
13,
9, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
APPENDIX F
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page144
143
60 of 811
171
499
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
Case 5:14-cv-02559-PD Document

15 Filed
1 of 3 Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone
and 09/14/15
Advanced
Stan Media
J.Page
Caterbone,
Group,
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT,
Petitioner,
v.
LYNN BISSONETTE, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civ. No. 14-2559
ORDER
I previously dismissed Petitioners pro se motion for habeas relief so that she could file a
counseled motion.
(Doc. No. 3.)
She has not yet done so.
On June 23, 2015, Stanley
Caterbonewho has nothing to do with Petitioner, her motion, or this casefiled a pro se
amicus brief in support of the dismissed motion. (Doc. No. 4.) Caterbone neither sought leave
to file, nor indicated that he had received the Parties consent to file an amicus brief. Fed. R.
Civ. P. 29(a).
The amicus briefalthough providing some arguments in apparent support of the
dismissed motionessentially focuses on the damages Caterbone allegedly suffered from his
years of torture as a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control or as a victim of gang-stalking or
organized stalking by more than 100 people. (Doc. No. 4 at 7, 9). He also includes a lengthy
discussion of the perplexing question of Stan Caterbones intelligence, or lack thereof, and his
work on a digital movie that is directly responsible for the development of the internet.
(Id. at 16-26). In addition, he details thirty governmental attempts at mind control, including:
1) Blanketing my dwelling and surroundings with electromagnetic energy; 2) Invading my
thoughts via remote sensing technologies; and 3) Making me mentally hear others voices
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page145
144
54 of 811
61
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

15 Filed
2 of 3 Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone
and 09/14/15
Advanced
Stan Media
J.Page
Caterbone,
Group,
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
through the microwave hearing effect. (Id. at 27-30.)

Caterbones involvement in the matter did not end with his amicus brief. On July 6,
2015, he filed with this Court an email that he had sent to the Lancaster Police, asserting that he
has synthetic telepathy. (Doc. No. 5.) On September 2 and 3, 2015, Caterbone moved for
summary judgment. (Doc. Nos. 8, 9.) On September 3, 2015, he moved to file a copy of his
motion for reconsideration of the denial of his petition to proceed in forma pauperis in
Pennsylvania state court, (which had been dismissed as frivolous). (Doc. No. 10.)
On
September 9, 2015, he also moved to file: 1) an email exchange with the subject Muslims Using
My Situation to Fight Against the USA; 2) a Wikipedia article on Entrapment; and 3) an
exhibit of billing statements of his estimated fees for his 2007 work on wholly unrelated federal
and state court cases. (Doc. Nos. 11, 12, 14.)
On September 9, 2015, Caterbone called my
Chambers, demanding to speak with me, and then abruptly hung up.
I have already denied Caterbones request to file documents electronically. (Doc. No. 9.)
He has nonetheless continued to submit filings that have nothing to do with this case.
Page 2 of 3
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page146
145
55 of 811
62
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

15 Filed
3 of 3 Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone
and 09/14/15
Advanced
Stan Media
J.Page
Caterbone,
Group,
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED that Mr.
Caterbones Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 8, 9) and Motions to File Exhibits or
Statements (Doc. Nos. 10, 11, 12, 14) are DENIED as frivolous. It is FURTHER ORDERED
that Stanley J. Caterbone may no longer submit filingswhether electronic or in paper format
in the above-captioned case. The Clerk shall not docket any such filings without my approval.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond

_________________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.
September 11, 2015
Page 3 of 3
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page147
146
56 of 811
63
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
APPENDIX G
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page148
147
64 of 811
171
499
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,

9 Filed
Page
1 of 6 Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone
and09/03/15
Advanced
Stan Media
J.
Caterbone,
Group,
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
UNITED STATES DISlf"RICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLNAIA
\
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT,
Petitioner
v.
LYNN BISSONETTE, SUPERINTENDENT,
MCI-FRAMINGHAM,
and
CRAIG STEDMAN, THE DISTRICT ATfORNEY OF LANCASTER
COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
and
KATHLEEN KANE, THE ATfORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA,
Respondents
Civ. No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD
S 17=n
F uu~t:
lY
SEP - 3 2D15
MICHAELE. KUNZ, Clerk
By
Dep. Clerk
MOTION TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT:

AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing Pro Se, and Advanced
Media Group, as Movant, to file the following Motion for Summary Judgement according to rule 56
which reads:
"Rule 56. Summary Judgment
(a) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. A party may move for
summary judgment, identifying each claim or defense-or the part of each claim or defense-on which
summary judgment is sought. The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there
is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of
law. The court should state on the record the reasons for granting or denying the motion.
(b) TIME TO FILE A MOTION. Unless a different time is set by local rule or the court orders otherwise,
a party may file a motion for summary judgment at any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery,
II
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page149
148
57 of 811
65
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

9 Filed
Page
2 of 6 Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone
and09/03/15
Advanced
Stan Media
J.
Caterbone,
Group,
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMNT
Given the preponderance of evidence associated with the MOVANT'S AMICUS and STATEMENTS,
the courts must conclude that In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Federal Judge Stuart Dalzall's findings of April 14, 1997, in the Lisa Lambert case identifying acts
of prosecutorial Misconduct, now, by virtue of the MOVANT'S AMICUS and STATEMENTS, now discloses
evidence of a bona fide pattern of prosecutorial misconduct, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and
in the County of Lancaster.
Criminal law may determine if these disclosures would warrant investigations of a possible criminal enterprise. The MOVANT'S AMICUS and STATEMENTS is of material interest to the Habeus Corpus
filed by Lisa Michelle Lambert in May of 2014, for the very fact that this MOVANT'S AMICUS and
STATEMENTS compromises the very same integrity of the court, which would tip the scales of justice
even further from the peoples deserving rights.
In the truthfulness of MOVANT'S AMICUS and STATEMENTS, The Commonwealth must concede
and immediately release Lisa Michelle Lambert from incarceration in order to balance the scales of justice, which no other act could accomplish. The Commonwealth must yield the criminal culpability of
Lisa Michelle Lambert to the superior matter of restoring the integrity to the courts; by it's own admission of wrongdoing, assuring the peoples of it's commitment to administer equalities of justice, not inequalities of justice, balancing the scales of justice. Anything less, would take the full scope of jurisdiction out of the boundaries of our laws, negating our democracy and impugning the Constitution of the
United States.
In addition the MOVANT must be restored to whole by administering SUMMARY JUDGEMENTS in
cases 05-2288; 06-4650; and all other cases filed by the MOVANT in this court. SUMMARY JUDGEMENTS must also be administered in Case No. 08-13373 in the Lancaster Court of Common Pleas, and
other cases filed by the MOVANT in that said court.
2
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page150
149
58 of 811
66
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

9 Filed
Page
3 of 6 Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone
and09/03/15
Advanced
Stan Media
J.
Caterbone,
Group,
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
AFFIDAVIT OF 1998 TO HONORABLE JUDGE STEWART DALZELL
"I, Stanley J. Caterbone being duly sworn according to law, make the following affidavit concerning the years during which I was maliciously and purposefully mentally abused, subjected to a
massive array of prosecutorial misconduct, while enduring an exhaustive fight for the sovereignty of
my constitutional rights, shareholder rights, civil liberties, and right of due access to the law. I will detail a deliberate attempt on my life, in 1991, exhibiting the dire consequences of this complaint. These
allegations are substantiated through a preponderance of evidence including but not limited to over
10,000 documents, over 50 hours of recorded conversations, transcripts, and archived on several digital mediums. A "Findings of Facts" is attached herewith providing merits and the facts pertaining to
this affidavit. These issues and incidents identified herein have attempted to conceal my disclosures of
International Signal & Control, Pie. However, the merits of the violations contained in this affidavit will
be proven incidental to the existence of any conspiracy.
The plaintiff protests the courts for all remedial actions mandated by law. Financial considerations would exceed $1 million. These violations began on June 23, 1987 while I was a resident and
business owner in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, and have continued to the present. These issues
are a direct consequence of my public disclosure of fraud within International Signal & Control, Pie., of
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, which were in compliance with federal and state statutes governing
my shareholder rights granted in 1983, when I purchased my interests in International Signal & Control., Pie.. I will also prove intentional undo influence against family and friends towards compromising
the credibility of myself, with malicious and self serving accusations of "insanity". I conclude that the
courts must provide me with fair access to the law, and most certainly, the process must void any
technical deficiencies found in this filing as being material to the conclusions. Such arrogance by the
Courts would only challenge the judicial integrity of our Constitution."1. The activities contained herein
may raise the argument of fair disclosure regarding the scope of law pertaining to issues and activities
compromising the National Security of the United States. The Plaintiff will successfully argue that due
to the criminal record of International Signal & Control, including the illegal transfer of arms and technologies to an end user Iraq, the laws of disclosure must be forfeited by virtue that "said activities
posed a direct compromise to the National Security of the United States".; the plaintiff will argue that
his public allegations of misconduct within the operations of International Signal & Control, Pie., as
early as June of 1987 ;demonstrated actions were proven to protect the National Security of the United
States .. The activities of International Signal & Control,
Pl~.,
placed American troops in harms way. The
plaintiff's actions should have taken the American troops out of harms way causing the activities of the
International Signal & Control, Pie., to cease and desist.
All activities contained herein have greatly
compromised the National Security of the United States, and the laws of jurist prudence must apply towards the Plaintiff's intent and motive of protecting the rights of his fellow citizens. Had the plaintiff
been protected under the law, and subsequently had the law enforcement community of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the County of Lancaster administer justice, United States troops may have
3
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page151
150
59 of 811
67
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016
,jl

9 Filed
Page
4 of 6 Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone
and09/03/15
Advanced
Stan Media
J.
Caterbone,
Group,
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
'
been taken out of harms way, as a direct result of ceasing the operations of International Signal &
Control, Pie., in as early as 1987.
2. The plaintiff will successfully prove that the following activities and the prosecutorial misconduct were directed at intimidating the plaintiff from continuing his public disclosures regarding illegal
activities within International Signal & Control, Pie,. On June 23, 1998, International Signal & Control,
Pie was negotiating for the $1.14 billion merger with Ferranti International, of England. Such disclosures threatened the integrity of International Signal & Control's organization, and Mr. James Guerin
himself, consequently resulting in adverse financial considerations to all parties if such disclosures provided any reason to question the integrity of the transaction, which later became the central criminal
activity in the in The United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Pennsylvania.
3. The plaintiff will prove that undo influence was also responsible for the adverse consequences
and fabricated demise of his business enterprises and personal holdings. The dire consequences of the
plaintiff's failed business dealings will demonstrate and substantiate financial incentive and motive. Defendants responsible for administering undo influence and interference in the plaintiff's business and
commercial enterprises had financial interests. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a taxing authority, Lancaster County had a great investment who's demise would facilitate grave consequences to it's
economic development.. Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon) would have less competition in the
mortgage banking business and other financial services, violating the lender liability laws. The Steinman Enterprise's, Inc., would loose a pioneer in the information technologies industries, and would
protect the public domain from truthful disclosure. The plaintiff will also provide significant evidence -of
said perpetrators violating common laws governing intellectual property rights.
4. Given the plaintiff's continued and obstructed right to due process of the law, beginning in June of
I
1987 and continuing to the present, the plaintiff must be given fair access to the law with the opportunity for any and all remedial actions required under the federal and state statutes. The plaintiff will
successfully argue his rights to the courts to rightfully claim civil actions with regards to the totality of
these activities, so described in the following "Findings of Facts", regardless of any statute of limitations. Given the plaintiff's genuine efforts for due process has been inherently and maliciously obstructed, the courts must provide the opportunity for any and all remedial actions deserving to the
plaintiff.
5. Under current laws, the plaintiff's intellectual capacity has been exploited as means of discrediting the plaintiff's disclosures and obstructing the plaintiff's right to due process of the law. The
plaintiff has always had the proper rights under federal and state laws to enter into contract. The logic
and reason towards the plaintiff's activities and actions are a matter of record, demonstrated in the
"Findings of Facts", contained herein .. The plaintiff will argue and successfully prove that the inherent
emotional consequences to all of the activities contained herein have resulted in Post Traumatic Stress
4
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page152
151
60 of 811
68
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

9 Filed
Page
5 of 6 Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone
and09/03/15
Advanced
Stan Media
J.
Caterbone,
Group,
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
Syndrome. The evidence of the stress subjected to the plaintiff, will prove to be the direct result of the
activities contained herein, rather than the exhibited behavior of any mental deficiency the plaintiff
may or may not have. The courts must provide for the proper interpretations of all laws, irrespective of
the plaintiff's alleged intellectual capacity. The plaintiff successfully argue that his "mental capacity" is
of very little legal consequence, if any; other than in it's malicious representations used to diminish the
credibility of the plaintiff.
6. The plaintiff will demonstrate that the following incidents of illegal prosecutions were purposefully directed at intimidating the plaintiff from further public disclosure into the activities of International Signal & Control, Pie., consequently obstructing the plaintiff's access to due process of the law.
Due to the fact that these activities to which the plaintiff's perpetrators were protecting were illegal activities, the RICO statutes would apply. To this day, the plaintiff has never been convicted of any crime
with the exception of 2 speeding tickets. The following report identifies 34 instances of prosecutorial
misconduct during the prosecutions and activities beginning on June 23, 1987 and continuing to today.
7) Given the preponderance of evidence associated with this affidavit, the courts must conclude
that In The United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Federal Judge Stuart
Dalzall's findings of April 14, 1997, in the Lisa Lambert case identifying acts of prosecutorial Misconduct, now, by virtue of this affidavit, now discloses evidence of a bona fide pattern of prosecutorial
misconduct, in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in the County of Lancaster. Criminal law must
now determine if these disclosures would warrant investigations of a possible criminal enterprise. This
affidavit is of material interest to the Lambert case, for the very fact that this affidavit compromises
the very same integrity of the court, which would tip the scales of justice even further from the peoples deserving rights .. In the truthfulness of this affidavit, The Commonwealth must concede Lisa
Michelle Lambert to balance the scales of justice, which no other act could accomplish. Commonwealth
must yield the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert to the superior matter of restoring the integrity to the courts; by it's own admission of wrongdoing, assuring the peoples of it's commitment to
administer equalities of justice, not inequalities of justice. Balancing the scales of justice. Anything
less, would take the full scope of jurisdiction out of the boundaries of our laws, negating our democracy and impugning the Constitution of the United States. The plaintiff must be restored to whole."
5
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page153
152
61 of 811
69
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016
.#

9 Filed
Page
6 of 6 Pro Se
Stan J. Caterbone
and09/03/15
Advanced
Stan Media
J.
Caterbone,
Group,
DRAFT
Billing
COPY
File
Date: September 2, 2015
scaterbone@live.com
6
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page154
153
62 of 811
70
171
499
62
70
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday
Tuesday
November
October 12,
10,
13, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
APPENDIX H
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page155
154
71 of 811
171
499
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
A Teenage Murder Mystery DVD
1 of 2
http://store.aetv.com/html/product/index.jhtml?id=75922
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Visit AETV.com
VIEW CART: 0 ITEMS | CHECKOUT | MY ACCOUNT | HELP
SEARCH:
SHOP BY SUBJECT
Exclusively at
The A&E Store
American Justice: A Teenage Murder Mystery DVD
Hollywood DVDs - NEW!

A&E Original Movies on DVD
Only available on DVD
New Releases from A&E

Availability: Product will ship on
06/11/07, why?
Discount DVDs & More

SHOP BY SHOW
Ships to U.S. and Canada

1 DVD(s) / 50 Minutes
Closed Captioning: No
Criss Angel: Mindfreak DVDs

Dog The Bounty Hunter DVDs
Driving Force DVDs
Get $1 Shipping on
your entire order!
$24.95
Intervention DVDs
Qty: 1
Gift Finder
Toys & Games
Gift Certificates
DVDs en Espaol
Closed Caption
Catalog Request
Other customers also liked...
Child's Play,
Deadly Play
DVD
American
Justice set DVD
$59.95
$24.95
Murder In A
College Town
DVD
$24.95
PRODUCT DETAIL:
A Teenage Murder Mystery DVD
-->
It is one of the more extraordinary cases ever tried in Pennsylvania, not because of the crime,
which was certainly heinous, but for what has come afterwards. One woman has been convicted
twice, by the same judge, of the same crime, and has gone to jail twice.
AMERICAN JUSTICE recounts every step of the strange journey of Lisa Michelle Lambert in this
gripping program. Hear from Hazel Snow, the victim's mother, who says her daughter whispered
"Michelle did it" as she lay dying in her arms with a slit throat and a rope around her neck.
Examine the conflicting testimony that Lisa and her two codefendants have given. And unravel the
bizarre web of legal decisions that have made this case into one of the most complicated in the
history of Pennsylvania.
Featuring interviews with the prosecutors who tried the case, the Attorney General of
Pennsylvania, friends of the victim and Lisa herself, this is a fascinating look at a case that may
yet have surprises in store.
This DVD is one of the many titles in our DVD Library and is created in the DVD+R format.
This disc does not feature menu pages or special features like standard DVDs, simply the high
quality programming you've come to expect from us. Click here for more details.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page156
155
72 of 811
171
499
88
Page 1 of 4
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
05.28.2007
5/28/2007 3:35 PM

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
APPENDIX I
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page157
156
73 of 811
171
499
88
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Lisa Michelle Lambert

A Bitter Lesson for Lancaster County; Judge says Pennsylvania community 'lost
its soul' in push to convict woman of murder.
Residents claim he, not they, are mocking justice.
Right or wrong, his ruling challenges U.S. court system's balance of power.
[Home Edition]
BARRY SIEGEL.
Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles, Calif.: Nov 10, 1997. pg. 1
Full Text (8866 words)
By midmorning on the first day of Lisa Michelle Lambert's federal habeas corpus hearing, U.S. District
Judge Stewart Dalzell already could be seen displaying alarm over what he was hearing. From the lawyers'
briefs alone, he'd read enough to persuade him to grant Lisa's request for this uncommon federal review
of a state murder conviction. He'd read enough to suspect that just possibly, Lisa Lambert, although
sentenced to life without parole, hadn't killed Laurie Show over a teenage romantic rivalry. He'd read
enough to surmise that just maybe, Lisa's boyfriend,
Lawrence "Butch" Yunkin, along with a girl named Tabitha Buck, had killed Laurie. Now, he was listening
to evidence that served only to deepen his concerns regarding Lancaster County's prosecution of Lisa. It
was March 31. Computers, boxes of documents and piles of papers filled the small hearing room on the
fifth floor of the federal courthouse in downtown Philadelphia. Lisa's parents sat in the first row, Laurie
Show's behind them. Reporters and court personnel occupied the jury box. On the stand, an expert
witness for Lisa's side, Northwestern University speech professor Charles Larson, was testifying.
Contrary to the autopsy report, Larson believed--as did three emergency medical technicians and the
Philadelphia medical examiner--that Laurie Show's left carotid artery had been severed by whoever
slashed her throat. This, he explained, left her unable to say "Michelle did it," as Laurie's mother, Hazel,
had claimed. Her vocal tract was "destroyed," her left brain hemisphere "dying." She was "totally
incapable of speech."
How, asked Lisa's attorney, Christina Rainville, could two doctors have signed an autopsy report saying
that the carotid arteries weren't "involved"?
Those two doctors were both Lancaster County physicians, one the part-time coroner, the other an earnose-and-throat specialist. "I don't think they were telling the truth," Larson replied. Dalzell peered over
gold wire-rimmed bifocals at the witness.
"Oh," he said. "Well, OK."
So it went, hour by hour, for 15 days.
That this hearing was even being held appalled most in Lancaster County, about 75 miles west of
Philadelphia. In the 1991 killing of Laurie Show, Lisa had already been found guilty of first-degree murder,
Tabitha Buck of second-degree, Butch Yunkin of third-degree.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page158
157
74 of 811
171
499
88
Advanced Media Group
Page 1 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Now here was Lisa, claiming her innocence, claiming all sorts of prosecutorial abuse. Now here was Lisa,
seeking a federal order freeing her because the state had illegally imprisoned her.
For Lisa to cast herself as an innocent victim was maddening enough. For a federal judge to take her
seriously was unimaginable. Yet that was just what was happening in this Philadelphia courtroom.
The second day of the hearing found Dalzell puzzling over two quite different versions of a videotaped
police search of the Susquehanna River. The one initially provided by the Lancaster County district
attorney, eight minutes long, had no soundtrack, and no images of police finding a pink bag Lisa said
she'd thrown there. The second, obtained through discovery only after Rainville realized she'd been sent
an edited tape, was four minutes longer. It had sound. It also had an officer kicking at a pink bag while
another asked, "What do you got, a bag?"
After watching these tapes, Dalzell removed his glasses and rubbed his eyes, something he'd do more
than once during the three-week hearing. He studied Lisa, also something he'd do more than once,
especially in the hearing's early days. Lisa, sobbing off and on, was staring down at the table where she
sat, bent over, her hands between her legs. Dalzell looked as if he were trying to fathom her character.
The third day found Dalzell puzzling over Lisa's initial statement to the police. He listened to East
Lampeter Police Det. Raymond Solt try to reconcile the typewritten first page, where Lisa says she wore
her own clothes at the murder scene, and a handwritten last page where Lisa says she wore Butch's
sweatpants. He listened to Solt explain how he destroyed all his notes from the interview. By the time Solt
stepped down, the judge was referring openly to "Ms. Lambert's alleged statement."
With Det. Ronald Barley on the stand later that afternoon, Dalzell grew even more openly dissatisfied.
Barley was a well-regarded detective in Lancaster County. A "very thorough investigator" is how Ted
Darcus, chairman of Lancaster's City Council, considered him. Barley "dealt well with people in our
community accused of crimes." Yet this wasn't apparent to Dalzell.
Barley, being questioned about the taped interview he helped conduct with Butch Yunkin--a tape full of
laughter, clicks and obvious gaps--kept waffling so much that Dalzell finally snapped: "Answer her
question! Yes or no?" Rather than heed the suggestion, Barley grew even more evasive. Asked about a
critical spot where the recorder clicked off, he denied even being in the interview room at that moment.
Dalzell had heard enough.
He called a recess and ordered all the lawyers into his chambers. "I want to know what is going on here,"
he told Lancaster County Dist. Atty. Joseph Madenspacher. "I'm hearing perjured testimony. . . . As we
had with Det. Solt, {Barley} is contradicting his own statement. . . . My patience has just run out. . . . I'm
afraid the commonwealth is allowing perjured testimony in federal court. . . . I'm being lied to. . . . This
man gives me the unbelievably fantastic statement that suddenly he 'evaporated.' It's totally incredible,
and I'm afraid I'm going to have to refer this, if this keeps up, to the United States attorney. . . ."
Madenspacher shifted uneasily. This hadn't been his case to try. He'd left the prosecution to his seasoned
first assistant, John Kenneff. "I understand what the court is saying . . .," he replied. "I don't know what
I'm going to do, but I'm going to do something."
Little changed, though, when Barley resumed the stand. He didn't recall his colleague, Det. Ronald "Slick"
Savage, turning the tape recorder on and off. He destroyed his notes after taking Butch's statement.
"No, no . . . please answer her questions. Will you do that?" Dalzell interrupted at one point.
"You knew . . . because you took the statement?" the judge asked later. "Or did you disappear for that
part? . . . Oh, do you have that ability to appear and disappear at will?"
By the time Barley tried to explain how he "completely forgot" they'd found a pink bag during the river
search--a pink bag that Lisa told them contained Butch Yunkin's bloodied sneakers--Dalzell was beside
himself. It helped his mood little when, with Barley still on the stand, Rainville moments later played the
segment of unedited videotape that showed an officer kicking the pink bag, then waving the camera off.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page159
158
75 of 811
171
499
88
Page 2 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
"No, that's not me," Barley said.
Rainville inched the videotape ahead a moment. "No, no ma'am."
Again she moved the tape forward. Now the man at the river could be seen clearly.
"That is me," Barley allowed. "I don't know why I waved at that point."
Dalzell again peered over his eyeglasses. "Who were you waving to? The record should reflect that the
witness definitely waved directly at the camera. What in the world were you doing, if you weren't waving
to the camera?"
Barley looked blank. "I don't recall, sir."
Defendant Alleges Gang Rape On the seventh day, Dalzell began to hear Lisa Lambert's story of being
gang-raped by three policemen six months before Show's murder.
Lisa--her extravagant eye makeup toned down but still too thick for Rainville's taste--had started
testifying the previous day.
Now she described being stalked by an officer named Robin Weaver, of vainly calling his police chief to
complain, of receiving threatening calls after the alleged attack. She explained how fear had kept her from
telling this story before. Finally, she explained why she now was willing to talk.
In a deposition given to Lisa's attorneys before the hearing, Weaver, without being asked, had referred to
the gang- rape accusation. He thought Lisa had cited it in her habeas petition, but she had not. The
charge had never been raised publicly. To Lisa, Weaver's comment, therefore, provided independent proof
of her claim: "There is no way that he could have ever known about that unless he was there and he did
it. It was not raised in the petition."
Dalzell interrupted: "Is that true?"
"That is true, your honor," said Rainville, who had been appointed by the judge to represent Lisa on a probono basis.
Dalzell again had heard enough: "We'll take another recess. . . . I want {Weaver} here this afternoon, and
I don't want anyone to say a word about what has come up here. If he resists, please tell me. I will have
the marshal arrest him, OK?"
Moments later, Dalzell learned that prosecutor John Kenneff already had discussed the rape allegation
with Weaver.
"So he's been coached . . . ," Dalzell exclaimed.
The judge's budding animosity toward Kenneff was palpable. The prosecutor had not yet appeared before
him, but the residue of his work at the Lambert trial was everywhere.
"I'm going to direct that Mr. Kenneff have no further contact with any witness in this case. . . ," Dalzell
declared. "And he might want to consult with counsel. . . . I'm going to want to hear about this, because
in the context of this case, Mr. Kenneff, God help untruths" being aimed at our police, urged East
Lampeter Supervisor Chairman John Shertzer. Don't "rush to judgment." It's "unfortunate that so much is
being made of such insignificant points."
In his opening statement at the hearing, Madenspacher, the district attorney, had allowed that the
investigation hadn't been "perfect," that maybe they'd been a little "careless," maybe a little "sloppy."
Others, though, refused even to acknowledge that much. All sorts of citizens instead continued to offer
glowing tributes to the police and prosecutors.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page160
159
76 of 811
171
499
88
Page 3 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
No one official drew more accolades than did John Kenneff. He is a big, heavyset man with a full, broad
Irish face. Growing up in Lancaster County, Kenneff was considered a fine schoolboy, a high achiever. Not
Harvard-level material, but his college, Villanova University, was nonetheless a good school. Not as good
as the University of Pennsylvania, but the next step.
He'd come back after law school, opened a private practice, worked his way up through the D.A.'s office.
He came to all the Fourth of July picnics; he brought his family, he brought his dog. He was known as a
committed, persistent prosecutor, one of the fairest and most reasonable in the county.
Even the defense attorneys who went up against him said as much. Even they called him a decent, honest
guy. To Terry Kauffman, a dairy farmer and chairman of the board of county commissioners, that
particularly carried a lot of weight: "A lot of people I know here, from both sides of the aisle, say he's the
best. I know them, and I've known Jack Kenneff for years. I don't know Stewart Dalzell."
Darcus--the chairman of the Lancaster City Council, a black man from West Virginia who followed a Boys'
Club job to Lancaster 30 years ago and happily settled--believed he possessed an especially close take on
John Kenneff's character. They'd been involved together in a "Weed and Seed" anti-crime development
program in Lancaster's minority community. So Darcus saw Kenneff not just as a prosecutor, but a
community leader. Also as a father: Kenneff's children went to the same Catholic school as Darcus' son.
"I've seen how he cares about people," Darcus said. "I've seen him deal with people in my community.
I've seen him go beyond what was needed. Knowing Jack Kenneff, I just can't picture this man doing what
the judge says. I wonder how that judge sleeps at night."
Denials From the Prosecutor No, John Kenneff insisted. No, he didn't think Butch Yunkin's sweatpants
were a critical issue at the murder trial. No, he had no recollection of looking at the sweatpants the state
put into evidence.
It was April 15, the hearing's 11th day. Kenneff had taken the witness stand soon after court convened.
Questioning him was Peter Greenberg, Rainville's husband, a partner at their law firm and one of
Philadelphia's most-accomplished litigators.
At the trial, the state's theory of the murder had Lisa wearing Butch's extra-large men's sweatpants,
found full of blood in a dumpster after the attack. Trial judge Lawrence F. Stengel accepted this theory
and thought it significant. So Kenneff's answers now caused Dalzell to lean forward.
"Did you make a conscious judgment at trial as to who was wearing the clothing that you put into
evidence?" Greenberg asked.
"It was my understanding that Miss Lambert had admitted to wearing the clothing . . . ," Kenneff replied.
Dalzell interrupted: "I don't think that's the question he asked you. And I think you ought to listen more
carefully to Mr. Greenberg's questions because I don't think you're answering them. . . . That question can
be answered yes or no."
So it went through much of the morning. Lancaster County citizens were right: Dalzell by then couldn't
hide his dismay for their assistant district attorney. The moments when the judge removed his glasses and
rubbed his eyes were adding up.
For 10 days he'd been exposed to an ever-more disturbing portrait of how Kenneff had prosecuted Lisa
Lambert. He'd listenedto the pathologist Isidore Mihalakis--a defense witness at Lisa's murder trial-describe private conversations with Kenneff that Dalzell thought constituted witness-tampering. He'd
heard how authorities had concealed critical testimony by Hazel Show's neighbor Kathleen Bayan. He'd
been presented evidence that convinced him the state had "lost" an earring of Butch's found on the
victim's body. He'd been presented evidence that convinced him the state had edited critical video and
audiotapes.
Now the man who oversaw the state's efforts sat before Dalzell on the witness stand.
No, Kenneff was testifying. He didn't recall looking at the river-search video.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page161
160
77 of 811
171
499
88
Page 4 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
"You didn't think it worthwhile to look at the video?" Greenberg asked.
"I didn't think what happened at the river was a contested issue," Kenneff replied.
This time, Greenberg snapped before the judge could: "You've been in this business long enough to know
that when I ask a question you're supposed to answer it?"
"Right," Kenneff agreed.
Dalzell joined in now: "It would be nice if you would do that. . . . I want to warn you, sir, that, if you don't
do that, you are going to put me into a position where this will have to get unpleasant. Do you understand
that? . . . The record should reflect that you have been consistently unresponsive to the questions. . . . "
Greenberg turned back to the matter of Butch's sweatpants. Now, Kenneff has even resisted saying he
based the case on the theory that Lisa wore Butch's clothing. He no longer, in fact, was sure whether the
sweatpants were Butch's.
The pair he'd produced for the habeas hearing, after all, were much smaller than men's extra-large. "The
sweatpants would have looked ridiculous if worn by 6-foot-1-inch-tall Butch," Kenneff had argued in a
written response just before the hearing.
"You are the same person . . . " Greenberg asked, "saying that the sweatpants would have looked
ridiculous on Butch, who put Butch on to testify in Lisa's trial . . . that they were his sweatpants, these
very same sweatpants that would have looked ridiculous on him?"
"Correct."
"These are the same sweatpants that Judge Stengel found belonged to Butch?"
"Correct."
"And if you had your way, Lisa would have been executed based on that evidence, wouldn't she?"
Kenneff hesitated; Dalzell spoke: "Yes or no," the judge ordered.
"That would be correct."
Greenberg erupted: "Do you think this is some kind of game? . . . Do you realize that there is a human
being sitting here who is in jail serving a life sentence based on the evidence you put on . . . that you are
now disowning. . . . Not only are you disowning it, you are committing perjury. . . . Are you sure it is Miss
Lambert who is a dangerous person in this courtroom?"
Handling of Letter Infuriated Judge In the end, the commonwealth's handling of the controversial 29
Question Letter was what most inflamed Dalzell.
Lisa had written Butch from jail, asking a series of questions. The answers Butch had scrawled under each
question, the judge felt, left no doubt that he was the murderer of Laurie, and that his accomplice was
Tabitha Buck. That the letter was authentic seemed equally certain to Dalzell: Both the state and defense
experts had affirmed there'd been no alteration.
Yet, Kenneff--after stipulating to the experts' opinions--had let Butch testify at Lambert's trial that the
questions were altered.
That the prosecutor knew his witness was committing perjury appeared obvious to Dalzell. At Butch's
plea-bargain hearing after Lisa's conviction, Kenneff wanted to revoke their deal precisely because of this
perjury.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page162
161
78 of 811
171
499
88
Page 5 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Experts had reviewed the 29 Questions Letter and Butch's trial testimony, Kenneff told the judge at that
Oct. 10, 1992, hearing.
"They advised us that his testimony . . . regarding that {letter} that was false . . . . It is our opinion that
he testified falsely . . . on that basis we feel we are entitled to withdraw from the original plea
agreement."
There just was no ambiguity, Dalzell felt: Kenneff knew that Butch committed perjury on a material issue,
regarding a document that established Lisa's innocence.
Under such circumstances, Dalzell believed Kenneff had an unambiguous ethical obligation to take
remedial action with the court that convicted Lambert. The Pennsylvania Rule of Professional Conduct was
clear about this: "A lawyer shall not knowingly . . . offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a
lawyer has offered material evidence and comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable
remedial steps."
Yet far from complying with this rule, it looked to Dalzell as if Kenneff had encouraged Judge Stengel to
accept Butch's perjured testimony. "I think he's just like any other witness," Kenneff told Stengel when
Lisa's attorney moved for a mistrial based on Butch's perjury. "You can believe some of it, all of it, or
none."
It was worse than that, in Dalzell's eyes. For, after obtaining a conviction based partly on this perjured
testimony, Kenneff had coolly proceeded to seek the death penalty for Lisa Lambert.
Now, remarkably, Kenneff at this habeas hearing--and in written responses that looked to Dalzell to be
blatantly false--was back to arguing that some of the 29 questions had been initially written in pencil, then
altered. In other words, Kenneff, before Dalzell, was defending testimony by Butch that he had told two
other judges was a lie.
"Do you want to take remedial actions with Judge Dalzell?" Peter Greenberg asked.
Here the judge interceded: "I was just going to ask that myself. . . ."
It was the morning of April 16, the hearing's 12th day. Kenneff had been on the stand for hours.
"Well, your honor," Kenneff responded. "I think I still feel the same way about the 29 questions. . . . That
there is some type of tampering with it. . . . "
"No, no, no, sir," Dalzell interrupted. "I am going to jump in here. You said in your answer to me that
there was pencil. And you have testified under oath here that your expert and the defense expert said
there was no graphite. . . . "
"Judge," Kenneff began.
Dalzell spoke over him: "I want to warn you, sir, you are under oath, and you are subject to the rules of
professional responsibility. . . . Do you retract that statement that you signed . . . as to pencil? Yes or
no?"
"I just don't think I can answer that question yes or no, judge."
Dalzell turned to Madenspacher, Kenneff's supervisor. "Does the commonwealth retract it?"
Madenspacher rose. "Yes, your honor. We retract it."
"Thank you," Dalzell said. He turned back to Kenneff. "Your boss just retracted it. Next question."
Their confrontation hadn't peaked yet.
The climax came minutes later, when Greenberg began listing all the pieces of evidence that the district
attorney's office kept from Roy Shirk, Lisa's attorney at her trial. What if Shirk had the names of the
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page163
162
79 of 811
171
499
88
Page 6 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
emergency medical technicians? What if he knew the police had found a pink bag? What if he had the
unedited river-search video? What if he knew a neighbor had seen Butch at the crime scene?
"Well," Kenneff tried to answer, "the Pennsylvania Rule provides for certain . . . "
That's as far as he got. Dalzell exploded: "No. Excuse me. We're talking here--let me just make something
clear to you. We're talking here about something called the United States Constitution, and in particular
the 14th Amendment thereof, which has a clause in it that refers to due process of law.
OK? Have you heard of that?"
"Yes sir."
"That's what we're talking about. . . . So we're not talking about the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal
Procedure. We're talking about due process of law here. . . . That's what we're talking about here. You got
it? Do you understand?"
"Yes," Kenneff replied.
Biggest Drama Begins to Unfold As it happened, the confrontation between Dalzell and Kenneff was
neither the most dramatic nor revealing sequence to occur on this 12th day of Lisa's habeas hearing. The
event that would eclipse it began only after Kenneff left the witness stand, and court adjourned for lunch.
Madenspacher, walking toward his hotel, bumped into Hazel Show's brother, who reported that his sister
needed to talk to him.
Back at the Holiday Inn in downtown Philadelphia, where both were staying, Madenspacher walked up to
Show's room.
Sobbing as she talked, the murder victim's mother told him her story.
During the hearing that morning, she'd suddenly recalled the morning of the murder: As she drove up
Black Oak Road to her condo, on her way to find Laurie's body, a brownish-colored car passed, heading
out of the condo complex. It was Butch's car.
She looked at Butch. There was recognition on his face. He pushed down someone with blond hair. There
was also a third person in the back seat, with black hair.
She'd told this to Det. Ron Savage back then. Savage had come to her house saying one of her neighbors
had seen Butch's car leave the complex. She'd started to say she had too. Savage had stopped her, told
her not to dwell on that. They had so many witnesses saying Butch wasn't there. Besides, this neighbor
lady was kind of disturbed anyhow. Probably wouldn't be a reliable witness. We were better to go with
Butch not being there.
Hazel was sobbing harder now. She'd forgotten about it, she told Madenspacher. She'd put it aside. Until
now.
Madenspacher was reeling. Hazel's story fit exactly with testimony given by that "neighbor lady," Kathleen
Bayan, on the hearing's fourth day. Testimony that Hazel hadn't heard because she'd left the courtroom
early that day. Testimony that had never been produced at Lisa's murder trial. Testimony that Kenneff
knew about back then but had never shared with Lambert's attorney. Testimony that Savage had tried to
water down while taking Bayan's initial statement, then dismissed as coming from a woman with "an
emotional problem."
Hazel's story also fit perfectly with something else: Lisa Lambert's testimony at her trial. There she'd told
of driving by Hazel Show, of Butch saying, "Oh . . . it's Hazel," of Butch pushing her head down.
Madenspacher pondered. If true, it seemed to him that this story knocked out the underlying theory of the
trial, which was that Butch wasn't at the condo. It didn't mean Butch was actually inside; it didn't clear
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page164
163
80 of 811
171
499
88
Page 7 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Lisa; it could be explained. But it was a new story. It changed the theory of the case. Madenspacher felt
as if he were slipping into shock.
"You sure?" he asked. "Let's hear it again."
Hazel repeated her story.
Madenspacher had no choice: He had to get this to the judge. He couldn't suppress it. The only question
was, when and how? It was going to come out anyway, Madenspacher figured. So let's get the bad news
over with.
The conference in Dalzell's chambers began at 1:40 p.m. that day. Present were the judge, the lawyers
for all sides, Hazel Show and Lisa Lambert.
Hazel Show told her story
courtroom today, I realized
condominium complex. . . .
about it until I was sitting in
again, this time before a court reporter: Well, when I was sitting in the
that I had seen Lawrence's {Butch's} car with passengers drive out of our
Det. Savage said that I wasn't to dwell on it. . . . I never thought anymore
there. . . . It all just came back.
By now, Lisa was sobbing along with Hazel.

"It's OK, Miss Lambert," Dalzell said. "It's OK."
To Dalzell, this revelation was the final straw. Throughout Lisa's trial the state had been at pains to keep
Butch as far from the Show condo as possible. No doubt that was why the state had never disclosed
anything about Hazel's report or Bayan.
To Dalzell, it wasn't just that Hazel's and Bayan's accounts were consistent with Lisa's testimony at trial
five years ago: Just about everything being revealed at this hearing was consistent with Lisa's testimony
back then.
From all he'd heard, Dalzell now believed that the commonwealth's misconduct had been so substantive, it
had undermined the state court's ability to find the truth. He believed the commonwealth had committed
at least 25 separate instances of prosecutorial misconduct--all constitutional violations, all violations of the
norms of a civilized society.
It seemed clear to him that Laurie Show did not say "Michelle did it." It seemed clear that Butch, in the 29
Questions Letter, confessed to the murder. It seemed clear Lisa didn't wear Butch's sweatpants on the
morning of the murder. It seemed clear the police had fabricated Lisa's initial statement.
Worse yet, in Dalzell's view, the commonwealth still hadn't stopped its treachery. At this habeas hearing
the state had produced not the extra-large sweatpants of Butch's from the original trial, but a smaller
girl's pair. The commonwealth, Dalzell believed, had perpetrated a fraud on the federal court; the
commonwealth had swapped evidence.
At least six state witnesses, by Dalzell's count, had perjured themselves before him. One, Ron Savage-now an elected district justice in Lancaster County--likely obstructed justice. And now this: now Hazel's
revelation, right before his eyes. Hazel had every reason to want Lisa's petition denied; Hazel sincerely
believed Lambert did it. Yet still she'd felt compelled to tell this story. Dalzell had never seen a more
courageous act.
"Well," the judge told those gathered in his chambers. "Now we come to the question of relief. Does the
commonwealth intend to defend this case?"
All eyes turned to Madenspacher.
The Lancaster County district attorney had been looking uncomfortable in recent days. Nothing he'd heard
rose to the level of conscious misconduct or obstruction, he kept insisting. But he had to admit, it hadn't
been a perfect trial or investigation. He wished certain things had been done differently.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page165
164
81 of 811
171
499
88
Page 8 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
In Lancaster County, then as now, there were many who wanted their district attorney to fight ferociously.
There were many who wanted their district attorney to defend their honor, to insist they'd done nothing
wrong, to match Lisa's lawyers blow for blow.
Yet, Madenspacher, at this moment, wasn't sure what should be done. Everything, he would say later, was
"spinning in my mind." It was "awful tough" operating away from the office. It "would have been nice" to
have known everything from the start.
"Now, obviously . . . " he finally told the judge. "There is some relief that is justified in this particular case.
. . ."
That was all Dalzell needed; he now had the commonwealth's assent. The state hadn't even put on its
case yet, but he meant to get Lisa out of prison. He also meant to get Savage off the bench forever; he
didn't see how Savage could hear cases anymore, and he planned to tell the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
just that.
"You can make a choice overnight," Dalzell advised the district attorney, "whether you want to defend this
case, put on your own witnesses. In the meantime, I'm going to release Ms. Lambert into some agreedupon custody. . . . Because it's quite clear now that the petitioner is entitled to relief, the only question is
how much."
Off to one side, a dismayed Hazel Show tried to interject: "Laurie told me she did it. . . . "
Madenspacher's voice overrode hers. "Yes, I agree relief is warranted, and I think we're talking now. . . . "
"About what relief," the judge said.
"What relief, your honor . . . "
"I can tell you, Mr. Madenspacher, that I've thought about nothing else but this case for over three weeks,
and in my experience, sir, and I invite you to disabuse me of this at oral argument, I want you and I want
the Schnader firm to look for any case in any jurisdiction in the English-speaking world where there has
been as much prosecutorial misconduct, because I haven't found it. .
. . So are we agreed that the petitioner will tonight be released into the custody of Ms. Rainville?"
Madenspacher nodded. "I don't see how I can object to that, your honor."
Stunned Response in Lancaster County In bars and cafes, street corners and living rooms, the citizens of
Lancaster County gasped at the news of Lisa's release. Their district attorney may not have seen reason to
object, but they did. Most sounded stunned; many sounded enraged. One man, at 8 a.m. on the morning
after her release, anonymously called in a phone threat to the Lancaster Sunday News, saying he would
kill Lambert if she returned to Lancaster.
Maybe there were "mistakes," the more rational by now were willing to allow. Maybe there was "sloppy"
police work. Maybe Lisa even deserves a new trial. Nothing more than that, though. Certainly not her
freedom. She was there, she was an accomplice, she was a co-conspirator. Give her a new trial, remand it
elsewhere even. But don't just let her go. You can't just let her go.
"Lambert is not innocent--how could she be?" the Lancaster New Era editorialized the day after Hazel
Show's revelation. " . . .
even with newly revealed evidence that supports her claims, Lambert is still irrevocably involved in the
events that lead to Laurie Show's murder. These facts must not be drowned out by the explosive
revelations at Lambert's federal appeals hearing. . . . "
As it happened, these thoughts exactly echoed those offered by Judge Stengel, who'd presided at Lisa's
murder trial. "Even if Lambert's story at trial was completely credible," Stengel had declared in his written
opinions, "she would still be an accomplice to the crime of murder. . . . The single most important fact on
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page166
165
82 of 811
171
499
88
Page 9 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
the issue of guilt is whether Ms. Lambert was present in the Show condominium at the time of the killing.
By her own admission, she was present. . . . "
Dalzell, however, simply did not accept this notion, at least not in a federal habeas hearing.
On the proceeding's final day, when Madenspacher in his closing argument spoke of Lambert being guilty
at least as an accomplice or conspirator, Dalzell waved him off. "She wasn't charged with conspiracy was
she?" he declared. "She was charged with first-degree murder. So the only issue before me is actual
innocence of first-degree murder. That is what she was convicted of."
In fact, the law is murky on this point. Lisa was actually charged with criminal homicide, which in
Pennsylvania encompasses all degrees of murder. How her conviction for first-degree murder affects her
exposure to lesser murder charges is a matter for debate.
So, Madenspacher tried to argue: "What I am saying here is that charged with criminal homicide, she
could be found guilty of murder in the first degree . . . or she could have been found guilty of second
degree . . . or she could be found guilty of third degree."
That didn't sway Dalzell: "But if one took her testimony, she said that she did everything possible to deescalate what spun out of control. . . . By her own testimony she exited when it started spinning out of
control. So therefore, it was not 'reasonably foreseeable' from her point of view, so the argument would
go."
The judge then cut things off: "Let's not waste time debating that."
Dalzell had good reason for not wishing to bother further with this issue. By then--after 14 days of
testimony covering 3,225 pages of transcript--the judge wasn't thinking only about Lisa's conduct at the
Show condo. He was thinking about the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, and the role of a federal
habeas corpus in upholding the unalienable right of due process.
Among other historic cases, Dalzell's mind was on a 1973 opinion by then-Justice William H. Rehnquist, in
United States vs. Russell. There, Rehnquist predicted that "we may some day be presented with a
situation in which the conduct of law enforcement agents is so outrageous that due process principles
would absolutely bar the government from invoking the judicial processes to obtain a conviction."
That day, Dalzell decided at the close of Lambert's hearing, had come.
While presiding at a habeas hearing, he reminded himself, he effectively sat as a court of equity--a court
operating under a system of law designed to protect rights and deliver remedial justice. He recalled the
ancient maxim that "equity delights to do justice, and not by halves." To give Lisa full relief, it seemed to
him imperative that he do nothing to benefit or empower those who had wronged her.
He would not just release Lisa, Dalzell decided. An outrageous violation of due process required even more
severe sanction. He would bar the state from ever retrying her. He would strip the state of its natural right
to adjudicate a murder committed within its boundaries.
He wrote his 90-page opinion over the weekend, after court adjourned at 4:10 p.m. on Friday, April 18.
Before a packed courtroom late the following Monday morning, he declared Lisa "by clear and convincing
evidence" to be "actually innocent of first-degree murder."
"If Lisa Lambert's is not the 'situation' to which Chief Justice Rehnquist referred, then there is no
prosecutorial malfeasance outrageous enough to bar a reprosecution. . . ." he proclaimed. "We have now
concluded that Ms. Lambert has presented an extraordinary, indeed, it appears, unprecedented case. We
therefore hold that the writ should issue, that Lisa Lambert should be immediately released, and that she
should not be retried."
In scorching language, Dalzell explained just why: "We have found that virtually all of the evidence which
the commonwealth used to convict Lisa Lambert of first-degree murder was either perjured, altered or
fabricated. Such total contempt for due process of law demands serious sanctions. The question we must
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page167
166
83 of 811
171
499
88
Page 10 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
now answer is whether . . . the commonwealth is entitled to get another try at convicting Lisa Lambert
and sending her to prison for the rest of her life. . . . In short, the question is whether we may accept a
promise from anyone on behalf of the commonwealth that a trial will be fair 'next time.' "
No, Dalzell concluded, we cannot.
"We hold that the due process clause of the 14th Amendment bars the commonwealth from invoking
judicial or any other proceedings against Lisa Lambert for the murder of Laurie Show. . . . Equitable
considerations preclude our leaving the decision whether to retry Lisa Lambert in the hands of those who
created this gross injustice. . . . "
As far as legal researchers could tell, there was an accepted basis, but no exact precedent for a federal
judge in Dalzell's situation to take such action. Dalzell did not stop there.
He was, he announced in his opinion, going to refer the matter of Kenneff's "blatantly unethical and
unconstitutional" actions to the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board. He also was going to refer the whole
Lambert prosecution to the U.S. attorney for investigation of "possible witness intimidation, apparent
perjury by at least five witnesses in a federal proceeding, and possible violations of the federal criminal
civil rights laws."
Still, Dalzell wasn't finished. He felt compelled, in the two final pages of his opinion, to address the
question of just why all this had happened in Lancaster County.
"Those who have read this sad history," he wrote, "may well ask themselves, 'How could a place idealized
in Peter Weir's'Witness' become like the world in David Lynch's 'Blue Velvet'?' Because it is so important to
that community and indeed tomany others to prevent a recurrence of this nightmare, we offer a few
reflections on the record."
Laurie Show's grandfather, Dalzell pointed out, was, in the 1980s, the coroner of Lancaster County. Her
mother was "a paragon of morality" who kept "a picture-perfect home." By contrast, Lisa Lambert was "as
though delivered from Central Casting for the part of villainess." By the testimony of even those who loved
her, "she was at the time literally 'trailer trash.' " The community "thus closed ranks behind the good
family Show and exacted instant revenge against this supposed villainess." Almost immediately after "the
snap judgment" was made, law enforcement officials uncovered "inconvenient facts," but soon "discovered
a balm for these evidentiary bruises, Lawrence Yunkin." Thus "Lancaster's best made a pact with
Lancaster's worst to convict the 'trailer trash' of first-degree murder."
Dalzell's parting words: "In making a pact with this devil, Lancaster County made a Faustian bargain. It
lost its soul and it almost executed an innocent, abused woman. Its legal edifice now in ashes, we can
only hope for a 'Witness'-like barn-raising of the temple of justice."
Uprising Began With Calls, Letters The uprising in Lancaster County in the wake of Dalzell's ruling began
first with the usual letters to editors and calls to radio talk shows.
The legal system is a "crock of crap." How could Dalzell destroy the reputation of "honorable and decent
people" for the purpose of freeing a "cold-blooded killer?" What kind of justice do we have?
Soon enough, such talk escalated. All sorts of theories about Dalzell's motives began circulating.
Something's been going on behind the scenes, it was suggested. Something behind what Dalzell did,
something we don't know about.
Ted Byrne, the conservative radio talk show host in Lancaster County, pored through Dalzell's decisions in
a law library. Then, seeking hidden connections, he analyzed the activities of the attorneys at Dalzell's old
law firm and Rainville's firm.
It was considered significant that Dalzell and Greenberg, 30 years before, had been classmates at the
University of Pennsylvania. Some talk had it that they were old pals. Some talk had it that Dalzell had
handed the Lambert case to his own "carefully assembled defense team."
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page168
167
84 of 811
171
499
88
Page 11 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Had Dalzell reached the end of a career path? Had he felt unfulfilled? Had he wondered how he might
become an appellate judge? Had he seen a challenge to the controversial habeas corpus situation as a
means to garner attention?
For that matter, how did the Lambert case get to Dalzell in the first place? Had not Dalzell displayed an
excessive personal interest in Lisa in his chambers? Was it possible that they had a relationship?
"We must begin to think who it was that had to gain from this travesty of justice other than Lambert,"
suggested one citizen in a letter to the editor. "My vote goes to Judge Stewart Dalzell. It would appear
that it is an appropriate time for this newspaper to dig very deep into the archives of the noteworthy
judge to determine what it was or who it was that set him on his grudge mission to 'punish' the county for
sins of the past committed against him."
Such comments reflected as much bewilderment as paranoia. They came from a citizenry who well knew
Lisa Lambert, and well knew those who had prosecuted her. Yet rarely did anyone, amid all the outpouring
of emotion and speculation, feel inclined to discuss the particulars of the Lambert case as revealed in
Dalzell's courtroom.
More common was East Lampeter Supervisor Chairman John Shertzer's response. "There were a lot of
false accusations throughout the trial. . . . We never had the opportunity to address those," Shertzer told
a reporter, before confessing that he, in fact, couldn't address them: "There are some things about this
that I don't have a lot of background in. But I just know these people. . . . They were treated very
abusively on the stand by Lambert's attorneys as well as the judge."
Lancaster's citizens were struggling to hold together a way of viewing their world. Even those willing to
acknowledge certain blemishes in that world--even those willing to acknowledge official wrongdoing in the
Lambert case--found themselves laboring to understand what Dalzell had done. No matter what was
revealed in a Philadelphia courtroom, no matter what Lancaster authorities did or failed to do, it seemed
incomprehensible that Dalzell would let Lisa Lambert walk free, without at least a retrial.
Not even Lisa's parents had hoped for that back when their daughter's appeals first started. Their dream,
Leonard Lambert told a reporter then, was that Lisa receive "a level of punishment that's not greater than
what's deserved. . . . It's a known fact that she was there. But something could argue that maybe she
doesn't deserve more than aggravated assault or third-degree murder."
Dalzell went too far, even the more reasonable in Lancaster County now declared. He was a disgrace to
the legal profession.
He had made a mockery of justice. He was a man without honor.
Hazel Show, more than anyone, sounded the clarion. "Thank you for listening to me," she'd told Dalzell on
the hearing's last day. "My parents brought me up to be truthful, and I believe in God. . . . So it is up to
me to tell the truth." Yet soon after, whether out of confusion or regret at what she'd wrought, Show
began to backtrack and revise.
Never in her "wildest dreams," she declared, had she thought her story would free Lisa. All her story
proved was that she got home just as the killers left, in time to hear her daughter's dying declaration. But
the judge "didn't want to hear that." The judge "wouldn't let me say that."
No matter that Madenspacher insisted Hazel never mentioned this notion to him in their hotel meeting. No
matter that she never mentioned this notion while on the witness stand on the hearing's last day. It now
became her constant refrain. "We have to get this judge off the bench," she began declaring publicly.
"There is not one bit of justice in him."
They began first with a petition drive. Hazel's ex-husband, John Show, drew it up, calling for Congress to
"investigate" Dalzell and take "corrective action," including impeachment. Show's girlfriend took it to her
beauty shop, where customers clamored to sign it. Local businesses started stocking piles on their front
counters. Volunteers called for extra copies, carried them door to door, offered them at yard sales. One
couple outside a Kmart parking lot on a hot Sunday collected more than 500 signatures.
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page169
168
85 of 811
171
499
88
Page 12 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
On the morning after an ad for the petition appeared in the Lancaster newspapers, John Show walked to
his mailbox and found 300 envelopes. By mid-September, he had 37,000 signatures.
Then came Hazel Show's 10-page "Citizens Action Report," the keystone of her newly launched national
campaign seeking to reform the entire federal judiciary. Now the Shows wanted, among a host of items,
to bar federal judges from banning retrials, to fix stricter guidelines for appointing federal judges, to limit
federal judges' terms in office. Hazel Show's words and image soon became ubiquitous in Lancaster
County.
Television provided one forum, both local talk shows and the national tabloids. Politicians provided
another. The Washington-based Judicial Selection Monitoring Project, an arch-conservative organization
seeking to block the appointment of what it calls "activist liberal judges," featured both Shows in a 15minute videotape that lambasted Dalzell and misidentified him as a Clinton appointee.
The Shows, accompanied by 16 friends and relatives, took their campaign to Washington on Sept. 17,
where Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter, along with Reps. Joseph R. Pitts and George W. Gekas, accepted
cartloads of petitions. The lawmakers, weeks before, had introduced legislation that would severely
restrict federal judges' power to bar retrials during habeas proceedings--a bill specifically designed to
reverse Dalzell's decision. Now, to the Shows, Specter agreed to call it the "Laurie Bill" and promised them
a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Wherever they went, the Shows were applauded and courted.
"How often do you get to do this?" Hazel observed.
"I think we made an impact," John offered.
Argument That Judge Brought It on Himself It can fairly be argued that Dalzell brought some of this on
himself. He may have overly embraced Lisa Lambert's account of events, and unduly diminished her role.
He may not have needed to rough up witnesses in his courtroom as much as he did. He certainly need not
have painted Lancaster County with such a broad brush at the end of his opinion.
How could he claim to know this county, his critics asked. How could he claim to know our citizens? How
could he say such things about us?
Yet, valid as such claims may be, it most likely will be Dalzell who leaves a lasting impact, not those
fueling the backlash against him.
Whether right or wrong, whether he operated entirely within his bounds, a federal judge consumed by
moral outrage has, as he intended, sent a message. The idea behind Lisa Lambert's outright release was
not, finally, to let a guilty person go free. It was to let the powers of the state know they can't violate
bedrock principles of the Constitution and get away with it.
They haven't.
In early May, the U.S. attorney's office in Philadelphia, responding to Dalzell's referral, announced it had
launched a criminal investigation into those who investigated and prosecuted Lisa Lambert. Aiding them
will be the FBI and the Justice Department's civil rights division. They will focus on John Kenneff and
seven police officers, among them Ronald Savage, Ronald Barley, Robin Weaver and Raymond Solt.
Days later, the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, in refusing Lancaster County's motion for a temporary
stay of Dalzell's order, said "the commonwealth has not demonstrated that it is likely to prevail on the
merits of its appeal. . . . We remind the commonwealth that Judge Dalzell's factual findings are based on
his view of the credibility of the witnesses and testimony. . . .
We can only reverse if we find them clearly erroneous."
In that written opinion, the appellate panel also chastised the commonwealth for calling Lisa Lambert a
"convicted killer" in its brief. She "no longer has that status," the 3rd Circuit reminded. "Indeed, that
description is inflammatory and inappropriate, given {Dalzell's} findings of actual innocence. . . . "
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page170
169
86 of 811
171
499
88
Page 13 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
What remains to be seen is whether Dalzell will ultimately be allowed his unprecedented involvement in a
state's sovereign affairs. At the habeas hearing's end, Lancaster County hired its own high-powered
Pennsylvania law firm, Sprague & Lewis, known for its political connections, particularly to the Republican
Party. On Oct. 21, when lawyers for both sides argued the merits of the county's appeal before a 3rd
Circuit panel, the appellate judges grilled them on a critical question: Did Lisa Lambert exhaust all her
appeals in Pennsylvania's courts before turning to a federal judge for help?
This issue, rather than any question of Lisa's innocence or a prosecutor's malfeasance, is what presently
fuels a nationwide debate in the legal community and beyond. Elemental principles of law and government
in this country normally restrain federal intrusion until a state has heard all claims, and has been given
the chance to correct its own errors. Just weeks ago, a 3rd Circuit panel--saying "we are sensitive to the
independence of the Pennsylvania courts and of that state's sovereignty"denied another convict's habeas
petition because he hadn't exhausted his state appeals.
Dalzell, in his opinion, recognized these principles, then essentially dismissed them. The Pennsylvania
General Assembly, he pointed out, amended its statutes in 1995 to exclude "actual innocence" as a basis
for certain appeals. By doing so, Dalzell declared, Pennsylvania, in effect, relinquished its jurisdiction over
claims such as Lisa Lambert's, and placed them "squarely into the federal forum." And even if
Pennsylvania were willing to consider some of Lambert's claims, Dalzell added, "we find that the state
proceedings that would follow if we dismissed this action are ineffective to protect the rights of Ms.
Lambert."
By thus declaring his utter distrust in Pennsylvania's ability to deliver justice, Dalzell has challenged the
fundamental balance ofpower between state and federal courts that governs the judicial system. This is
why five state attorneys generalincluding California's--have joined Pennsylvania in an amicus brief that
talks of the Dalzell ruling's "potential to seriously weaken, if not to dismantle entirely, the system for
litigating habeas actions." This is why law-and-order-minded national politicians have their knives out for
Dalzell. This is why Lisa Lambert's federal hearing promises to be one of the most carefully reviewed cases
in criminal law for a long time to come.
This is also why Dalzell's actions will leave a legacy no matter what the outcome of the present appeals.
His ruling may or may not stand, his ruling may or may not establish a formal precedent, but--by granting
a hearing and allowing widespread discovery--Dalzell has required that attention be paid to what
happened in a Lancaster County courtroom in the summer of 1992. He's shown why the federal habeas
corpus action is essential to the integrity of the judicial system.
Dalzell has also set a moral, if not legal, example. Rulings in one case often affect other rulings. One
judge's decision shapes not just the outcome of a particular case, but also the character of justice. What
he doesn't allow, others likewise forbid.
In mid-May, in Lancaster County court, Lisa Lambert's original trial lawyer, Roy Shirk, serving as defense
attorney in a routine burglary case, rose to ask for a mistrial. As in the Lambert case, he argued,
prosecutors in this one had failed to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. Shirk most likely
meant only to put this commonplace claim into the record for later review, but Judge Paul K. Allison, to
the lawyers' astonishment, promptly granted his request.
Yes, the judge said in declaring a mistrial, this is exactly what Dalzell felt happened to Lisa Lambert.
PHOTO: Lisa Michelle Lambert walks ahead of lawyers, Peter Greenberg and Christina Rainville, to court
hearing.;
PHOTOGRAPHER: Associated Press;
PHOTO: Lancaster County Dist. Atty. Joseph Madenspacher talks to news media after judge ruled Lisa
Michelle Lambert innocent of charges.;
PHOTO: Hazel Show, left, stands in bedroom where daughter, Laurie, was murdered.;
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page171
170
87 of 811
171
499
88
Page 14 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
PHOTO: Laurie's father,
John Show, above, hugs woman identified as his girlfriend, after judge ruled Lisa Michelle Lambert
innocent.;
PHOTO: U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell was assigned the writ of habeas corpus that
set him on a course to freeing Lisa Michelle Lambert.;
PHOTOGRAPHER: Associated Press
Credit: TIMES STAFF WRITER
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited
without permission.
Subjects: Judicial reviews, Acquittals & mistrials, Murders & murder attempts, Prosecutions, Series &
special reports
Locations: Lancaster County Pennsylvania
People: Lambert, Lisa, Show, Laurie
Document types: News
Dateline: LANCASTER, Pa.
Section: PART-A; National Desk
ISSN/ISBN: 04583035
U.S.C.A.
Stan
LOCAL,
Caterbone
STATE,
16-1149FEDERAL
&To
FEDERAL
US Supreme
COURT
COURT
Court
DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page
Page172
171
88 of 811
171
499
88
Page 15 of 15
Wednesday
Thursday
Sunday November
October 12,
10, 2016
13,
10/20/2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
CHAPTER
DIVIDER

DOCKDETSPage
Page 173 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 174 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 175 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 176 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 177 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 178 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 179 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 180 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 181 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 182 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 183 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 184 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 185 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 186 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 187 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 188 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 189 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 190 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 191 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 192 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 193 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 194 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 195 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 196 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 197 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 198 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 199 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 200 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 201 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 202 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 203 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 204 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 205 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 206 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 207 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 208 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 209 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 210 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 211 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 212 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 213 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 214 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 215 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 216 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 217 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 218 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 219 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 220 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 221 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 222 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 223 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 224 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 225 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 226 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 227 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 228 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 229 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 230 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 231 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 232 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 233 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 234 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 235 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 236 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 237 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 238 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 239 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 240 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 241 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 242 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 243 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 244 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 245 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 246 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 247 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 248 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 249 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 250 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 251 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 252 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 253 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 254 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
PROTHONOTARY OF LANCASTER COUNTY

Katherine Wood-Jacobs
Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
PARENT FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK

vs.
MICHAEL T CATERBONE (et al.)
Case Number
CI-1988-0654
PROTHONOTARY DOCKET ENTRIES

02/19/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET COMPLAINT FILED BY HARTMAN UNDERHILL & BRUBAKER BY: MARK
STANLEY, ESQ. AMOUNT CLAIMED IS $105,385.58 PLUS ACCRUED INTEREST, LATE CHARGES,
MONTHLY ESCROW INSTALLMENTS, ATTORNEY'S FEES & COSTS OF SUIT. RECORDER OF
DEEDS NOTIFIED. MORTGAGE WAS RECORDED IN MORTGAGE BOOK NO. 1896, PAGE 166.
02/19/1988
CONVERTED FEE INFORMATION WRIT & TAX
02/19/1988
CONVERTED FEE INFORMATION PROTHY
02/22/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET NOTIFICATION GIVEN.
03/02/1988
CONVERTED FEE INFORMATION PROTHY
03/14/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 3:35 P.M. SERVED COMPLAINT IN MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE ON

STANLEY J. CATERBONE, DEFENDANT, SHERIFF'S OFFICE, 50 NORTH DUKE STREET,
LANCASTER, PA SO ANSWERS JAMES J. WENNER, DEPUTY SHERIFF.
03/22/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET NOT FOUND AS TO DEFENDANT, MICHAEL T. CATERBONE, SO ANSWERS

THEODORE S. SATTLER, SHERIFF LANCASTER COUNTY.
03/24/1988
CONVERTED FEE INFORMATION SHERIFF'S COSTS
04/07/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 4:30 P.M. PRAECIPE FILED TO REINSTATE THE ABOVE COMPLAINT.
04/11/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET MAILED COMPLAINT IN MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE TO MICHAEL T.

CATERBONE BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, RESTRICTED DELIVERY AT
865 N. EAST 74TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33138, SO ANSWERS THEODORE S. SATTLER,
SHERIFF LANCASTER COUNTY.
04/15/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 11:07 A.M. ANSWER OF DEFENDANT, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, FILED.
05/23/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 4:17 P.M. PRAECIPE FILED TO REINSTATE THE ABOVE COMPLAINT.
05/24/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET COMPLAINT WAS REINSTATED AND WAS RESENT. SO ANSWERS

05/24/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET NEVER RECEIVED CERTIFIED GREEN CARD, SO ANSWERS, THEODORE

S. SATTLER, SHERIFF LANCASTER COUNTY.
05/24/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET COMPLAINT MAILED TO MICHAEL T. CATERBONE IN MIAMI, FLORIDA BY

CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. SO ANSWERS THEODORE S. SATTLER,
SHERIFF LANCASTER COUNTY.
06/06/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 4:45 P.M. PRAECIPE FILED TO SUBSTITUTE THE ATTACHED

VERIFICATION OF STANLEY CATERBONE FOR VERIFICATION OF MICHAEL P. MCDONALD, ESQ.,
IN THE ABOVE MATTER.
06/20/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET COMPLAINT WAS RETURNED MARKED UNCLAIMED. NO SERVICE WAS

DONE, SO ANSWERS THEODORE S. SATTLER, SHERIFF LANCASTER COUNTY.
10/16/1991
CONVERTED DOCKET TERMINATED PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 350.
10/16/1991
TERMINATED BY LOCAL RULE 350 CASE UPDATED ON FEBRUARY 3, 1999 DMH
$45.50 PAID ON 880219 BY PLTF

$0.40 PAID ON BY
$0.00 PAID ON BY

DOCKDETSPage
Page 255 of 811
499
(c) CountySuite Prothonotary, Teleosoft, Inc.
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
FULTON BANK
vs.
STANLEY J CATERBONE
Case Number
CI-06-02271

03/08/2006
CAPTION ENTRY IS: FULTON BANK(MA) VS STANLEY J CATERBONE(MA_)
03/08/2006
COMPLAINT IN MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE FILED BY SHAWN M LONG ESQ(MA). THE

MORTGAGE WAS RECORDEDIN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF DEEDS OF AND FOR
LANCASTER COUNTY PA ON JANUARY 24,1995 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 220 STONE
HILL ROAD A/K/A LOT#5 CONESTOGA PA. THE NOTE IS SECURED AND ACCOMPANIED BY A
MORTGAGE DATED JANUARY 20, 1995.
03/08/2006
COPY OF 1 COMPLAINT, 1 SHERIFF FORM, $150.00 CHECK TO SHERIFFS OFFICE.

3 COMPLAINTS, RECEIPT TO ATTORNEY.
03/08/2006
SHERIFF'S ACTION OPEN RECEIVED FROM PROTHONOTARY 1 COPY OF CIVIL ATION

COMPLAINT, 1 SHERIFF RETURN FORM. 1 CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF 150.00 FROM BARLEY
SNYDER 299-5201 RECEIPT # 144853.
04/11/2006
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. REINSTATED AS

DIRECTED BY RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY. (2 COPIES TO ATTY, 1 COPY OF
COMPLAINT WITH $150 CHECK & SHERIFF FORM TO SHERIFF)
04/11/2006
SHERIFF'S ACTION OPEN RECEIVED FROM PROTHONOTARY 1 COPY OF CIVIL COMPLAINT, 1

SHERIFF'S RETURN FORM. 1 CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $150.00 FROM BARLEY SNYDER,
PHONE #717-299-5201, SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. RECEIPT # 145608.
04/12/2006
NO SERVICE AS PER STANLEY CANTERBONE AT 220 STONE HILL ROAD, CONESTOGA, PA. 19516.
REMARKS: REINSTATE COMPLAINT. NO CALL BACK CARDS WERE LEFT. SO ANSWERS LT,
JAMES MONTANEZ, DEPUTY SHERIFF OF LANCASTER, PA. REFUND CHECK 04/10/06
CHECK#60085 89.26 SHERIFF'S FEES PAID 60.74
04/12/2006
SHERIFF'S ACTION CLOSED
05/01/2006
SERVED CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT UPON STANLEY CATERBONE BY PERSONAL SERVICE AT

LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE,50 NORTH DUKE STREET, LANCASTER, PA. SO
ANSWERS, LT. JAMES MONTANEZ, DEPUTY SHERIFF OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PA. REMARKS:
ATTEMPTED TO REFUSE SERVICE. REFUND CHECK 05/01/06 CHECK#60473 79.91
SHERIFF'S FEES PAID 70.09
05/01/2006
SHERIFF'S ACTION CLOSED
05/08/2006
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, DEFT. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

OF SAME.
06/06/2006
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. FILED BY

SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME.
06/06/2006
MOTION OF PLAINTIFF FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME.
06/28/2006
PRAECIPE FILED TO ASSIGN PLAINTIFF FULTON BANK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO
THE COURT FOR DISPOSITION AS UNOPOSSED WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY:
SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. (JUDGE GEORGELIS)
(ASSIGNED JUNE 28, 2006)
06/28/2006
AMENDED PRAECIPE TO ASSIGN PLAINTIFF FULTON BANK'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS TO THE COURT FOR DISPOSITION AS UNOPPOSED WITH CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE. FILED BY: SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. (JUDGE GEORGELIS)

DOCKDETSPage
Page 256 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
06/29/2006
J. Caterbone
and
Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
ORDER FILED: AND NOW, THIS 29th DAY Stan
OF JUNE,
2006, UPON
CONSIDERATION
OF PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, AS WELL AS DEFENDANTS RESPONSE THERETO,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT SAID MOTION IS GRANTED. THE MOTION IS
DEEMED UNOPPOSED FOR THE DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE BRIEF
L.C.R.C.P.NO.1034(a)D. ACCORDINGLY, JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED IN PLAINTIFFS FAVOR
AND AGAINST DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $97,425.07, PLUS CONTINUING INTEREST AFTER
MARCH 2, 2006 AT A RATE OF $14.56 , PLUS CONTINUING LATE CHARGES AND COSTS. BY THE
COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. JUDGMENT DATE 6/29/06 ENTERED AS DIRECTED.
PROTHONOTARY, RANDALL O. WENGER. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY CATERBONE, (2)
(236 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT MAILED TO DEFENDANT).
07/20/2006
JUDGMENT - COURT ORDER ENTER JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST

DEFENDANT, STANLEY J. CATERBONE IN THE AMOUNT OF $97,425.07, PLUS CONTINUING
INTEREST AFTER MARCH 2, 2006 AT A RATE OF $14.56 PER DIEM, PLUS CONTINUING LATE
CHARGES AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S JUNE 29, 2006 ORDER. FILED BY SHAWN
M. LONG, ESQ. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT MAILED TO THE DEFENDANT. JUDGMENT
ENTERED AS DIRECTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
07/25/2006
APPEAL TO HIGHER COURT FILED. NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA FROM THE ORDER DATED JUNE 29, 2006 WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
07/28/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) A HEARING ON THE DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR IN FORMA PAUPERIS
STATUS WILL BE HELD IN CURTROOM 5 AT 9:00 A.M. ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 9, 2006. BY
THE COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.
07/31/2006
PRAECIPE-WRIT OF EXECUTION FILED. WRIT ISSUED. AFFIDAVIT OF NON-MILITARY SERVICE.

PRINCIPAL: $88,568.53; INTEREST TO 03/02/2006 AT A RATE OF $14.56 PER DIEM: $4,442.96;
NEGATIVE ESCROW BALANCE: $1,096.38; LATE CHARGES: $317.20; ATTORNEYS' FEES:
$3,000.00; TOTAL: $97,425.07. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.
07/31/2006
AFFIDAVIT - RULE 3129 CONCERNING THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 220 STONE HILL ROAD
A/K/A LOT #5 STONE HILL ROAD, TOWNSHIP OF CONESTOGA, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA
17516. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.
07/31/2006
NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE AT 220 STONE

HILL ROAD, CONESTOGA, PA 17516. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.
07/31/2006
NOTICE PURSUANT TO PA. R.C.P. 3129. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.
07/31/2006
NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE TO ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST AND CLAIMANTS. FILED BY SHAWN
M. LONG, ESQ.
07/31/2006
WRIT ORIGINAL WRIT, SERVICE FORMS, AND $2,500.00 CHECK SENT TO SHERIFF'S DEPT.
AUGUST 1, 2006.
08/01/2006
SALE DATE DECEMBER 20, 2006.
08/01/2006
PROPERTY ADDRESS 220 STONE HILL ROAD, A/K/A LOT #5 STONE HILL RD., CONESTOGA,
CONESTOGA TOWNSHIP
08/01/2006
PROPERTY NUMBER 56
08/01/2006
SHERIFF OPEN REAL ESTATE CASE RECEIVED CHECK FROM BARLEY SNYDER IN THE AMOUNT
OF $2,500.00 RECEIPT #147468
08/08/2006
SERVED DEF. STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PERSONALLY, WITH A NOTICE OF SALE AND/OR

HANDBILL AT LANCASTER COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 50 NORTH DUKE ST., 2ND FLOOR,
LANCASTER SO ANSWERS LT. MARC A. LANCASTER.
08/11/2006
IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH PRAECIPE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRESENTED TO

COURT AND COURT ENTERS ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. MICHAEL A.
GEORGELIS, JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICE SENT TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE AND
SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 257 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
08/11/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. THE DEFENDANT

HAS
JUNE
29,Stan
2006 Media
ORDER
GRANTING
Stan
J.APPEALED
CaterboneMY
and
Advanced
J.
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. HE IS DIRECTED TO FILE, BY
AUGUST 25, 2006, A CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE MATTERS COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL,
PURSUANT TO Pa. R.A.P. 1925(b). THE PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO FILE ITS ANSWER,
SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING THOSE MATTERS IDENTIFIED BY THE DEFENDANT, BY SEPTEMBER
8, 2006. COPIES OF EACH MUST BE DELIVERED TO MY CHAMBERS BY THOSE DATED. BY THE
COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICE SENT TO: STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, PRO SE AND SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.
08/17/2006
PROOF OF SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF SHERIFF SALE UPON DEFENDANT AT 220 STONE HILL
RD., CONESTOGA, PA 17516 BY CERTIFIED MAIL ON AUG. 11, 2006. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG,
ESQ.
08/17/2006
PROOF OF SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF SHERIFF SALE UPON DEFENDANT AT 220 STONE HILL
RD., CONESTOGA, PA 17516 BY FIRST CLASS MAIL ON AUG. 11, 2006. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG,
ESQ.
08/17/2006
PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF SHERIFF'S SALE BY MAIL TO LIENHOLDERS ON AUG. 11,

2006. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.
08/31/2006
SERVED WRIT OF EXECUTION WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION BY LEVY/ATTACHMENT UPON

REAL PROPERTY BY LT. JAMES MONTANEZ.
09/05/2006
OPINION PURSUANT TO Pa.R.A.P. 1025(a) FILED. BY THE COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS,

JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICE SENT TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE AND SHAWN M.
LONG, ESQ.
09/06/2006
RECORD SENT TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA - NO. 1463 MDA 2006. COPY OF
THE LIST OF RECORD DOCUMENTS SENT TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE AND SHAWN M.
LONG, ESQ. OF BARLEY SNYDER, LLC.
09/25/2006
POSTED SHERIFF'S HANDBILL ON GARAGE DOOR OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 220 STONE HILL
ROAD A/K/A LOT #5 STONE HILL ROAD, CONESTOGA TOWNSHIP SO ANSWERS DEPUTY SHERIFF
HORACE R. GRIEST, JR.
12/20/2006
SHERIFF SOLD PROPERTY LOCATED AT 220 STONE HILL ROAD A/K/A LOT #5 STONE HILL ROAD,
CONESTOGA, CONESTOGA FOR THE ABOVE-COST AMOUNT OF $156,000.00 TO CENTRAL PENN
PROPERT SERVICES, INC.
12/20/2006
SHERIFF SOLD PROPERTY LOCATED AT 220 STONE HILL ROAD, A/K/A LOT #5 STONE HILL ROAD,
CONESTOGA, CONESTOGA TOWNSHIP FOR THE ABOVE-COST AMOUNT OF $156,000.00 TO
CENTRAL PENN PROPERTY SERVICES, INC.
01/02/2007
WRIT RETURNED TO PROTHONOTARY, SHERIFF FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,340.62 PAID AND A
REFUND CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,676.25, CK 66219 DATED FEBRUARY 1, 2007 WAS MAILED
TO BARLEY SNYDER SAME DATE.
01/08/2007
CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA - NO. 1463 MDA
2006 FILED. AND NOW, THIS FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY, 2007 THE APPEAL IN THIS MATTER ID
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE A BRIEF. PER CURIAM.
01/31/2007
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BEFORE BUSINESS JUDGE (JUDGE JAMES P. CULLEN) ON

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2007 @10:00 AM. FILED BY: SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.
01/31/2007
RESPONSE OF FULTON BANK TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE OF

REAL ESTATE. FILED BY: SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
02/01/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND, NOW THIS 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2007, UPON CONSIDERATION
OF STANLEY CATERBONE'S PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE OF REAL ESTATE AND FULTON
BANK'S RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT SAID PETITION IS DENIED, WITH
PREJUDICE. ACCORDINGLY, THE SHERIFF IS DIRECTED TO MAKE THE SCHEDULED
DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS FROM THE DECEMBER 20, 2006 SHERIFF'S SALE OF THE
PROPERTY KNOWN AS 220 STONE HILL ROAD, CONESTOGA, PENNSYLVANIA AND TO DELIVER
THE SHERIFF'S DEED TO SUCH PROPERTY TO THE PURCHASER AT SUCH SHERIFF'S SALE. BY
THE COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICE SENT TO: SHAWN LONG,
ESQ.
02/01/2007
CERTIFICATION-RECORDER- DEEDS DATE FEBRUARY 1, 2007 STEVE MCDONALD, RECORDER

OF DEEDS, HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT A DEED WAS LEFT WITH HIM FOR RECORDING BY TERRY
A. BERGMAN, SHERIFF OF LANCASTER COUNTY, FOR PROPERTY SITUTATED AT 220 STONE
HILL ROAD, CONESTOGA TOWNSHIP, LANCASTER COUNTY, PA, RECORDED IN THIS OFFICE,
REFERENCE NO. 5592704. STEVE MCDONALD, RECORDER OF DEEDS

DOCKDETSPage
Page 258 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
02/06/2007
Stan
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro
REPLY TO FULTON BANK'S RESPONSE TO
PETITION
TO SET ASIDE
SALE.
FILED
BY: STANLEY
J. Se Billing File
CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
02/06/2007
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 1, 2007 ON STANLEY J. CATERBONE &

D. PAT ZIMMERMAN, ESQ. BY FIRST CLASS MAIL ON FEBRUARY 1, 2007. FILED BY: SHAWN M.
LONG, ESQ.
02/20/2007
LETTER FROM JAMES D. MCCULLOUGH, DEPUTY PROTHONOTARY, SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA.
RETURNED HEREIN IS THE NOTICE OF APPEAL RECEIVED IN THE PROTHONOTARY'S OFFICE,
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, FOR THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER TO BE
PERFECTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE:
PA.R.A.P. 551 THRU 561 FILING FEE/IFP ORDER/VERIFIED STATEMENT
PA.R.A.P. 906 SERVICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL TO ALL PARTIES
PA.R.A.P. 904(d) DOCKET ENTRIES REFLECTING ORDER APPEALING
PA.R.A.P. 905 ERRONEOUS FILING (RECEIVED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ON
FEBRUARY 15, 2007).
02/20/2007
RECORD RETURNED FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA - NO. 1463 MDA 2006.
ORDER FILED. AND NOW, THIS FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY, 2007 THE APPEAL IN THIS MATTER
IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE A BRIEF. PER CURIAM.
09/06/2007
CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA - NO. 248 MAL
2007 FILED. AND NOW, THIS 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2007, PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF
THE HONORABLE J. MICHAEL EAKIN IS HEREBY GRANTED.
09/06/2007
2007 FILED. AND NOW, THIS 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2007, THE PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF
APPEAL IS HEREBY DENIED. MR. JUSTICE EAKIN DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE CONSIDERATION
OR DECISION OF THIS MATTER.
09/06/2007
2007 FILED. AND NOW, THIS 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2007, THE APPLICATION FOR
RECONSIDERATION IS HEREBY DENIED. MR. JUSTICE EAKIN DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE
CONSIDERATION OR DECISION OF THIS MATTER.
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 259 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL (et al.)
Case Number
CI-06-03349

04/10/2006
COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE
04/10/2006
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE (MA) VS LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, (M7)
ET AL
04/28/2006
AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

OF SAME.
04/28/2006
AMENDED CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS DR. EMILY PRESSLEY, PSYCHIATRIC
DEPARTMENT AND LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL.
05/16/2006
PRAECIPE-ENTER APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANTS, DR. EMILY PRESSLEY AND

LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL. FILED BY MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
OF SAME.
01/12/2007
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE OF THE SAME.
04/03/2007
JUDGMENT-NON PROS PRAECIPE FOR JUDGMENT OF NON PROS ENTERED AGAINST

PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P. 1037(B), FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF.
04/12/2007
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 1028 (A)(1)

AND RULE 1028(A)(4) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. FILED BY: MEGAN R.
FORD, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
04/13/2007
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE

1028(a)(1) AND RULE 1028(a)(4) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE WITH
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY: MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. (SENT TO BUSINESS JUDGE
MADENSPACHER APRIL 17, 2007)
04/16/2007
JUDGMENT-NON PROS PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P. 1037(B) FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO

SE.
04/18/2007
ORDER ISSUING RULE FILED. AND NOW, UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED
DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE
1028(a)(4) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, IT IS THIS 18 DAY OF APRIL,
2007, HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. A RULE IS ISSUED UPON PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANTS NOT ENTITLED TO THE RELIEF REQUESTED PURSUANT TO THE PRELIMINARY
OBJECTION UNDER RULE 1028(a)(1). 2. PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION UNDER RULE 1028(a)(1) WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE DATE OF
THIS ORDER. (SEE FILE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). BY THE COURT: MICHAEL J.
PEREZOUS, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICE TO: CHRISTOPHER W. MATTSON, ESQ. (2)
04/23/2007
MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS

TO AMEND COMPLAINT. FILED BY: MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE
SAME.
04/24/2007
ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF

SERVICE OF THE SAME. (SEE FILE OF CI-06-07330 FOR ENTIRE DOCUMENT).
04/30/2007
MOTION OF DEFENDANTS TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S PRAECIPE FOR JUDGMENT OF NON PROS.

FILED BY: MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
04/30/2007
MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE PRAECIPE FOR

JUDGMENT OF NON PROS. FILED BY: MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE
SAME.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 260 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05/15/2007
Stan
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
PRAECIPE FILED TO ASSIGN DEFENDANTS'
PRELIMINARY
OBJECTIONS
TO THE
AMENDED
COMPLAINT AS UNOPPOSED PURSUANT TO RULE 1028(a)(4) WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
FILED BY: MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. (JUDGE CULLEN)
05/22/2007
PRAECIPE FILED TO ASSIGN DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S PRAECIPE FOR

JUDGMENT OF NON PROS WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY: MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ.
(JUDGE CULLEN)
08/13/2007
OPINION AND ORDER FILED. AND NOW, THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2007, DEFENDANTS'
MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S PRAECIPE FOR JUDGMENT OF NON PROS IS GRANTED AND
PLAINTIFF'S PRAECIPE IS STRICKEN. DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO THE
AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE SUSTAINED. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM
THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WHICH MUST BE SERVED AS
REQUIRED BY THE PENNSYLVANIA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. BY THE COURT: JAMES P.
CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: CHRISTOPHER W. MATTSON, ESQ., STANLEY J.
CATERBONE
08/29/2007
APPEAL FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE ORDER DATED AUGUST 10, 2007 WITH CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. (SENT TO JUDGE CULLEN AUGUST
29, 2007)
08/29/2007
JUDGMENT-NON PROS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF,

STANLEY J. CATERBONE FOR FAILURE TO FILE A CERTIFICATE OF MERIT IN THE
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLAIMS. FILED BY MEGAN R. FORD, ESQ. JUDGMENT ENTERED AS
DIRECTED, RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT MAILED
TO PLAINTIFF.
09/10/2007

PENNSYLVANIA FROM THE ORDER OF AUGUST 10, 2007 WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED
BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
09/11/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2007, PURSUANT TO
PENNSYLVANIA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 1925(b), DEFENDANT IS DIRECTED TO FILE
OF RECORD AND SERVE ON THE UNDERSIGNED A CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE ERRORS
COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL NO LATER THAN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS AFTER ENTRY OF THE
ORDER ON THE DOCKET. ANY ISSUE NOT PROPERLY INCLUDED IN THE STATEMENT TIMELY
FILED AND SERVED PURSUANT TO RULE 1925(b)(1) SHALL BE DEEMED WAIVED. BY THE
COURT: JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
CHRISTOPHER MATTSON, ESQ.
09/12/2007
EXHIBITS TO COMPLAINT. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF

09/13/2007
AMENDED ORDER FILED. AND NOW, THIS 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2007, PLAINTIFFS ARE
DIRECTED TO FILE OF RECORD AND SERVE A CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE ERRORS
COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL NO LATER THAN TWENTY-ONW(21) DAYS AFTER ENTRY OF THE
ORDER ON THE DOCKET. (SEE FILE FOR COMPLETE DETAILS). BY THE COURT: JAMES P.
CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236 NOTICE TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, CHRISTOPHER
MATTSON, ESQ.
09/14/2007
STATEMENT OF THE ERRORS COMPLAINED. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ESQ.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
11/02/2007
OPINION SUR APPEAL FILED. BY THE COURT: JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE. COPIES W/236
NOTICE SENT TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE AND CHRISTOPHER W. MATTSON, ESQ.
11/05/2007
THE LIST OF RECORD DOCUMENTS SENT TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE AND
CHRISTOPHER W. MATTSON, ESQ. OF BARLEY SNYDER, LLC.
01/18/2008
CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA FILED - NO. 1565
MDA 2007. THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. APPELLANT'S SECOND
REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS BRIEF IS DENIED AS MOOT. APPELLANT'S
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENISED AS MOOT. PER
CURIAM. JANUARY 17, 2008.
02/27/2008
ORDER FILED. THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED. PER CURIAM.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 261 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT (et al.)
Case Number
CI-06-03401

04/11/2006
04/11/2006
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE (MA) VS SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE

DEPARTMENT, (MA) CHIEF JOHN A. FIORILL, (MA) OFFICER BUSSER, OFFICER FEDOR, OFFICER
BURGER
04/28/2006
AMENDED COMPLAINT. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLTF, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF

SERVICE OF SAME.
04/28/2006
AMENDED CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE

DEPARTMENT, CHIEF JOHN A. FIORILL, OFFICER BUZZER, OFFICER FEDOR, STATE OF PA.
05/15/2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TO WILLIAM W. CAMBELL, ESQ. AND SOUTHERN REGIONAL OLICE

DEPARTMENT, CHIEF JOHN A. FIORILL, OFFICER BUSSER, OFFICER FEDORA VIA FIRST CLASS
MAIL ON MAY 10, 2006. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
05/31/2006
PRAECIPE-ENTER APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF ALL DEFENDANTS. FILED BY CHERYL L.

KOVALY, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME.
06/01/2006
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. FILED BY CHERYL L.

KOVALY, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME. (SENT UP TO BUS. JUDGE)
06/01/2006
BRIEF BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S

COMPLAINT.
06/07/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED: UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED PETITION, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT: A RULE IS ISSUED UPON THE RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
PETITIONER IS NOT ENTITILED TO THE RELIEF REQUESTED; THE RESPONDENT SHALL FILE AN
ANSWER TO THE PETITION WITHIN TWENTY DAYS OF SERVICE. (SEE FILE FOR DETAILS) THE
PETITIONER SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER TO AL PARTIES. BY THE
COURT: JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: CHERYL L. KOUNLY, ESQ. (3)
06/09/2006
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF

SERVICE OF SAME.
06/12/2006
BRIEF OF DEFENDANTS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE. FILED BY

CHERYL L. KOVALY, ESQ. FILED BY CHERYL L. KOVALY, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF
SAME.
06/15/2006
BRIEF (RESPONSIVE)OF PLAINTIFF TO PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS. FILED BY STANLEY J.

CATERBONE, PLTF, PRO SE.
06/15/2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF REPLY TO DEFENDANTS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS BY FIRST CLASS MAIL ON JUNE 15, 2006. FILED BY STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, PRO SE.
06/15/2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE ORDER ENTERED AND FILED ON JUNE 7, 2006 VIA FIRST
CLASS MAIL TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE ON JUNE 13, 2006. FILED BY CHERYL L. KOVALY, ESQ.
07/06/2006
PRAECIPE FILED TO ASSIGN PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO THE

AMENDED COMPLAINT TO THE COURT FOR DISPOSITION WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
FILED BY: CHERYL L. KOVALY, ESQ. (JUDGE MADENSPACHER)
(ASSIGNED JULY 11, 2006)
07/14/2006
CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE GEORGELIS JULY 14, 2006

DOCKDETSPage
Page 262 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
07/17/2006
Stan
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED: THE DEFENDANT'S
PRELIMINARY
OBJECTIONS
TO THE
COMPLAINT
ARE SUSTAINED. THE PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO FILE, BY AUGUST 14, 2006, AN AMENDED
COMPLAINT SPECIFICALLY PLEADING THE FACTS IN SUPPORT OF HIS CLAIMS AND IN FULL
COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF PA.R.C.P.NO.1018.1, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022,
1023.1, 1024, 1025 AND ALL APPLICABLE L.C.R.C.P. THE PLAINTIFF IS FURTHER DIRECTED TO
SERVE THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL PA.R.C.P. FOR SERVICE OF
ORIGINAL PROCESS. SEE PA.R.C.P.NOS. 400, 401, 402, 405, AND 422. THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
FILED ON APRIL 28, 2006 IS STRICKEN. BY THE COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. CC'S
W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, JUDGE, CHERYL L. KOVALY, ESQ.
07/25/2006

PENNSYLVANIA FROM THE COURT ORDER DATED JULY 14, 2006 WITH BRIEF AND CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
07/28/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) A HEARING ON THE DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR IN FORMA PAUPERIS
STATUS WILL BE HELD IN CURTROOM 5 AT 9:00 A.M. ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 9, 2006. BY
THE COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, CHERYL L. KOVALY, ESQ.
08/11/2006
IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH PRAECIPE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY STANLEY J.

CATERBONE, PRO SE PRESENTED TO COURT AND COURT ENTERS ORDER GRANTING IN
FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. BY THE COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. COPIES W/236
NOTICE SENT TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ESQ. AND CHERYL L. KOVALY, ESQ.
08/11/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. THE PLAINTIFF HAS APPEALED MY JULY 14, 2006 ORDER SUSTAINING
THE DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO THE COMPLAINT. HE IS DIRECTED TO FILE,
BY AUGUST 25, 2006, A CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE MATTERS COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL,
PURSUANT TO Pa. R.A.P. 1925(b). THE DEFENDANTS ARE DIRECTED TO FILE THEIR ANSWER,
SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING THOSE MATTERS IDENTIFIED BY THE DEFENDANT, BY SEPTEMBER
8, 2006. COPIES OF EACH MUST BE DELIVERED TO MY CHAMBERS BY THOSE DATED. BY THE
COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICE SENT TO: MICHAEL A.
GEORGELIS, JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICE SENT TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE AND
CHERYL L. KOVALY, ESQ.
08/15/2006
PRAECIPE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
08/15/2006
NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
08/15/2006
BRIEF FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
09/05/2006
OPINION PURSUANT TO Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a). BY THE COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE.

COPIES W/236 NOTICE SENT TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE AND CHERYL L. KOVALY,
ESQ.
09/06/2006
THE LIST OF RECORD DOCUMENTS SENT TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE AND CHERYL
LYNN KOVALY, ESQ. OF LAVERY, FAHERTY, YOUNG & PATTERSON, P.C.
09/06/2006
RESPONSE OF DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT OF MATTERS COMPLAINED OF ON

APPEAL. FILED BY CHERYL L. KOVALY, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME.
09/20/2006
REPLY OF DEFENDANTS TO DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO STATEMENT OF MATTERS

COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLTF. CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE OF SAME.
10/16/2006
CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA - NO. 1461 MDA
2006 FILED. APPELLEES, DEFENDANTS BELOW, HAVE FILED A MOTION TO QUASH THIS PRO SE
APPEAL FILED BY PLAINTIFFS BELOW FROM THE JULY 14, 2006 ORDER STRIKING THEIR
COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING THEM TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT BY AUGUST 14, 2006.
APPELLANTS DID NOT FILE AN ANSWER TO THIS MOTION. AN APPEAL WILL LIE ONLY FROM A
FINAL ORDER UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY RULE OR STATUTE. MCCUTCHEON V.
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC CO., 788 A.2d 345 (Pa. 2002). A FINAL ORDER IS ANY ORDER THAT
DISPOSES OF ALL CLAMIS AND ALL PARTIES. Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)(1). AN ORDER STRIKING A
COMPLAINT AND GIVING THE PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN AMEDED COMPLAINT IS NOT A FINAL,
APPEALABLE ORDER. FOR FINALITY TO OCCUR, THE TRIAL COURT MUST DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE THE COMPLAINT IN FULL. SEE MIER V. STEWART, 683 A.2d 930 (Pa. SUPER. 1996).
ACCORDINGLY, AS THE JULY 14, 2006 ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINAL DISPOSITION OF
THIS MATTER, THE MOTION TO QUASH THIS APPEAL IS GRANTED. PER CURIAM.
AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLTF. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF

SAME.& FEDERAL COURT DOCKETS
LOCAL, STATE,
DOCKDETSPage
Page 263 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
11/01/2006
11/02/2006
Stan J.
Caterbone
and Advanced
Media
J. Caterbone,
Pro Se Billing File
JUDGMENT-NON PROS IN FAVOR DEFENDANT
AGAINST
PLAINTIFF
FORStan
FAILURE
TOGroup,
FILE
COMPLAINT. FILED BY CHERYL L. KOVALY ESQ. ENTERED AS DIRECTED. RANDALL O. WENGER,
PROTHONOTARY. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT SENT TO PLAINTIFF.
11/07/2006
MOTION FOR 60 DAY CONTINUANCE DUE TO DETENTION. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE.
11/27/2006
ORDER FILED. APPELLEES, DEFENDANTS BELOW, HAVE FILED A MOTION TO QUASH THIS PRO
SE APPEAL FILED BY PLAINTIFFS BELOW FROM THE JULY 14, 2006 ORDER STRIKING THEIR
COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING THEM TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT BY AUGUST 14, 2006.
APPELLANTS DID NOT FILE AN ANSWER TO THIS MOTION. AN APPEAL WILL LIE ONLY FROM A
FINAL ORDER UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY RULE OR STATUTE. MCCUTCHEON V.
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC CO., 788 A.2d 345 (Pa. 2002). A FINAL ORDER IS ANY ORDER THAT
DISPOSES OF ALL CLAIMS AND ALL PARTIES. Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)(1). AN ORDER STRIKING A
COMPLAINT AND GIVING THE PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IS NOT A
FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER. FOR FINALITY TO OCCUR, THE TRIAL COURT MUST DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE THE COMPLAINT IN FULL. SEE MIER V. STEWART, 683 A.2d 930 (Pa. Super. 1996).
ACCORDINGLY, AS THE JULY 14, 2006 ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINAL DISPOSITION OF
THIS MATTER, THE MOTION TO QUASH THIS APPEAL IS GRANTED. PER CURIAM.
01/12/2007
04/24/2007

November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 264 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
THOMAS D GRASSEL
Case Number
CI-06-03403

04/11/2006
04/11/2006
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE (MA) VS THOMAS D. GRASSEL (MA)
05/15/2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SCHEDULE F, ADDENDUM TO ADD CREDITORS TO SCHEDULE TO

THOMAS D. GRASSEL BY FIRST CLASS MAIL ON APRIL 12, 2006. FILED BY STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, PRO SE.
06/06/2006
IMPORTANT NOTICE OF DEFAULT UPON THOMAS D. GRASSEL ON JUNE 1, 2006. FILED BY

STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME.
01/12/2007
04/03/2007

04/16/2007

SE.
04/24/2007

November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 265 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP (et al.)

vs.
PFLUMM CONTRACTORS (et al.)
Case Number
CI-06-04939

05/24/2006
PRAECIPE IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH PRAECIPE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY

STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE
05/24/2006
CAPTION ENTRY IS: ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP (MA) STANLEY J. CATERBONE (MA) VS MR.
DAVID J. PFLUMM (MA) PFLUMM CONTRACTORS (MA) MR. BRETT W. STABLEY (MA) ALLEY KAT
RESTAURANT (MA) MIKE CATERBONE (MA)
05/25/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 24TH DAY OF MAY, 2006, THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO WAIVE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROCEEDING
WITH THE EXECUTION IN THE ABOVE MATTER IS HEREBY DENIED. BY THE COURT: DENNIS
REINAKER, JUDGE. COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE: STAN J. CATERBONE, PETITIONER (1 BY MAIL &
1 TO PICK UP BY PETITIONER)
01/12/2007
04/24/2007

12/13/2010
1ST NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF INACTIVE CIVIL CASES - P.R.C. - RULE 230.2 FILED
02/14/2011
TERMINATED BY PRC 230.2 TERMINATED BY PA. PRC 230.2.
02/28/2011
MAIL RETURNED NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF COURT CASE ADDRESSED TO STANLEY J.

CATERBONE. NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED, UNABLE TO FORWARD.
02/28/2011
MAIL RETURNED NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF COURT CASE ADDRESSED TO ADVANCED MEDIA

GROUP. NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED, UNABLE TO FORWARD.
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 266 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
RICHARD PLUM III (et al.)
Case Number
CI-06-07330

08/01/2006
COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
08/01/2006
IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY STANLEY J CATERBONE, PRO SE. IFP STATUS GRANTED. BY
THE COURT, MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. DATED AUGUST 10, 2006. COPY W/236 NOTICE
TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
08/01/2006
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP VS HARLEYSVILLE

INSURANCE, RICHARD PLUM, III
08/10/2006
COPY OF ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS SENT TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
08/24/2006
IMPORTANT NOTICE OF DEFAULT ON AUG. 24, 2006. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
09/07/2006
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS FILED BY DEFENDANT, HARLESVILLE

INSURANCE AND RICHARD PLUM III. FILED BY CHARLES E. HADDICK JR., ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE OF SAME.
09/07/2006
PETITION REGARDING PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS FILED PURSUANT TO 1028(a)(1) AND

PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS FILED PURSUANT TO 1028(a)(2) BY DEFENDANT, HARLEYSVILLE
INSURANCE (AKA "HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY') AGAINST THE PLAINTIFFS'
COMPLAINT. FILED BY CHARLES E. HADDICK, JR., ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME.
09/27/2006
REPLY OF PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS FILED BY HARLESVILLE

INSURANCE AND MR. RICHARD PLUM III. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLTF.
10/13/2006
ORDER ISSUING RULE FILED - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. A RULE IS ISSUED UPON THE
RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITIONER IS NOT ENTITLED TO THE RELIEF
REQUESTED 2. RESPONDENT SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE PETITION WITHIN 20 DAYS OF
SERVICE. 3. PETITION SHALL BE DECIDED UNDER PA.R.C.P. NO. 206.7 4. DISCOVERY SHALL BE
COMPLETED WITHIN 45 DAYS 5. PETITIONER SHALL FILE A BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITION
WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER DISCOVERY DEADLINE 6. PARTIES MAY AGREE TO AMEND ABOVE
DEADLINES IN WRITING 7. PETITIONER SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER
TO ALL PARTIES. BY THE COURT, HENRY KENDERDINE, JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICE TO:
CHARLES HADDICK, ESQ. (1) & STAN CATERBONE (1).
10/23/2006
BRIEF IN SUPPORT FOR MOTION FOR ARBITRATION - (PUT IN EXHIBIT FORM??????) AND
REQUESTED TO GO UP TO JUDGE MADENSPACHER. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME.
(BRIEF IN EXHIBIT HAS CASE NUMBER CI-06-02236 LISTED)
11/02/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED: AND NOW, THIS 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2006, THE PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR ARBITRATION IS DENIED AS PREMATURE, IT APPEARING THAT PRELIMINARY
OBJECTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED AND HAVE NOT BEEN ACTED UPON. NO PRAECIPE WAS ISSUED
REFERRING THE MATTER TO THE COURT FOR DISPOSITION. BY THE COURT: PAUL K. ALLISON,
JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, CHARLES E. HADDICK, JR., ESQ.
11/07/2006
MOTION FOR 60 DAY CONTINUANCE DUE TO DETENTION. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE.
11/09/2006
PRAECIPE FILED TO ASSIGN DEFENDANTS PETITION REGARDING PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS

BY THE COURT PURSUANT TO L.C.R.C.P. NO. 208.3(a) AND THE COURT'S ORDER OF OCTOBER
13, 2006 WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY: CHARLES E. HADDICK, JR., ESQ. (JUDGE
REINAKER)
(ASSIGNED NOVEMBER 15, 2006)

DOCKDETSPage
Page 267 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
12/26/2006
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Media
J. Caterbone,
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED: AND NOW, THISStan
26th DAY
OF DECEMBER,
2006,Stan
THE DEFENDANT'S
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO THE COMPLAINT ARE SUSTAINED. THE COMPLAINT FILED ON
AUGUST 1, 2006 IS STRICKEN. THE PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO FILE, BY JANUARY 15, 2007, AN
AMENDED COMPLAINT SPECIFICALLY PLEADING THE FACTS IN SUPPORT OF HIS CLAIMS AND
IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PA.R.C.P.NO'S.1018.1, 1019, 1020,
1021, 1022, 1023.1, 1024, AND 1025, AND ALL APPLICABLE L.C.R.C.P. THE PLAINTIFF IS FURTHER
DIRECTED TO SERVE THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IN FULL COMPLIANCES WITH ALL PA.R.C.P.
FOR SERVICE OF ORIGINAL PROCESS. SEE PA.R.C.P.NO'S.400, 401, 402, 405, AND 422. BY THE
COURT: DENNIS E. REINAKER, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
CHARLES E. HADDICK, JR., ESQ., GRANT W. SCHONOUR, ESQ.
01/12/2007
03/01/2007
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE. FILED BY: GRANT W. SCHONOUR, ESQ.

03/07/2007
AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/07/2007
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF AMENDED COMPLAINT. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/07/2007
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE ON GRANT W. SCHONOUR, ESQ.

BY FIRST CLASS MAIL & ELECTRONIC MAIL ON MARCH 8, 2007. FILED BY: STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, ESQ.
04/05/2007
JUDGMENT-NON PROS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF,

STANLEY J. CATERBONE, FOR FAILURE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE COURT ORDER DATED DECEMBER 26, 2006. FILED BY GRANT W. SCHONOUR, ESQ.
JUDGMENT ENTERED AS DIRECTED, RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY. NOTICE OF
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT MAILED TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE & GRANT W. SCHONOUR, ESQ.
04/24/2007

November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 268 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE (et al.)

vs.
MIKE CATERBONE
Case Number
CI-06-07376

08/02/2006
IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. IFP STATUS GRANTED. DATED
AUGUST 10, 2006. BY THE COURT, MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. COPY W/236 NOTICE TO:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
08/02/2006
COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
08/02/2006
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS MIKE CATERBONE
08/10/2006
COPY OF ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS (1) SENT TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE
08/24/2006
IMPORTANT NOTICE OF DEFAULT ON AUG. 24, 2006. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
01/12/2007
04/03/2007

04/16/2007
JUDGMENT-NON PROS PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P. 1037(A) FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO

SE.
04/24/2007

November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 269 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
MICHAEL K SCHAEFER (et al.)
Case Number
CI-06-08490

09/01/2006
COMPLAINT FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF.
09/01/2006
IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY STANLEY J CATERBONE, PRO SE (PER BUSINESS JUDGE MUST
FOLLOW THE PA.R.C.P. AND HAVE A PROPOSED ORDER AND AT THAT TIME WILL BE
CONSIDERED FOR IFP STATUS)
09/01/2006
COPY OF
09/01/2006
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS. MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE

DEPARTMENT AND
MICHAEL SCHAEFER
09/06/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2006, UPON
CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PETITIONER, STANLEY J. CATERBONE (ONLY), IS PERMITTED
TO PROCEED WITH THE FILING OF HIS/HER ACTION OR APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND
SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE COSTS OR FEES PAYABLE IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH
MATTER, BUT CONDITIONED UPON HIS/HER PAYMENT OF SUCH COSTS FROM THE PROCEEDS
OF A FINANCIAL RECOVERY IN THIS CASE. BY THE COURT: DAVID L. ASHWORTH, JUDGE.
CC'S W/236 NOTICE TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE
10/30/2006
PRAECIPE-ENTER APPEARANCE FOR DEFENDANT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE

DEPARTMENT ONLY. FILED BY JAMES D. YOUNG, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME.
01/12/2007
03/16/2007
PRAECIPE-ENTER APPEARANCE OF JAMES D. YOUNG, ESQ. ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT,

MICHAEL SCHAEFFER. FILED BY: JAMES D. YOUNG, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE
SAME.
03/16/2007
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE

1028 (A) (1), RULE 1028 (A) (2), AND RULE 1028 (A) (4), PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE. FILED BY: JAMES D. YOUNG, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
03/23/2007
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT.

FILED BY: JAMES D. YOUNG, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
03/26/2007
RESPONSE'S TO PREL. OBJ. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ESQ.
04/24/2007

09/17/2007
PRAECIPE-ENTER APPEARANCE OF ROBERT G. HANNA, JR., ESQ. ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANTS,

MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT & MICHAEL K. SCHAEFFER. FILED BY: ROBERT
G. HANNA, JR., ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
09/17/2007
PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW THE APPEARANCE OF JAMES D. YOUNG, ESQ. ON BEHALF OF

DEFENDANTS, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT & MICHAEL K SCHAEFFER.
FILED BY: JAMES D. YOUNG, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
PRAECIPE FILED TO ASSIGN DEFENDANTS', MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT

AND MICHAEL K. SCHAEFFER PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TO THE
COURT FOR DISPOSITION WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY: ROBERT G. HANNA, JR.,
ESQ. (JUDGE REINAKER)
(ASSIGNED
DECEMBER
5, 2007)
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 270 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 10,
13, 2016
11/20/2007
12/14/2007
Stan
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE ASHWORTH
DECEMBER
14, 2007.
01/11/2008
CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE WRIGHT JANUARY 11, 2008.
01/30/2008
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2008, IT IS ORDERED THAT
DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION BASED ON PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO EFFECTUATE
PROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS IS SUSTAINED. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED THIRTY (30) DAYS TO
REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT AND EFFECTUATE PROPER SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS. (SEE FILE
FOR COMPLETE DETAILS). BY THE COURT: JEFFERY D. WRIGHT, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236
NOTICE TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, ROBERT G. HANNA, JR., ESQ.
12/13/2010
02/14/2011
02/28/2011
MAIL RETURNED NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF COURT CASE ADDRESSED TO STANLEY J.

CATERBONE. NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED, UNABLE TO FORWARD.
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 271 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor

vs.
BENJAMIN RODA
Case Number
CI-06-08742

09/11/2006
COMPLAINT FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
09/11/2006
COPY OF SENT TO BUSINESS JUDGE ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2006.
09/11/2006
CAPTION ENTRY IS: ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP AND STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS. BENJAMIN
RODA
09/11/2006
IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
09/11/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS IS DENIED. 9-11-06. BY THE
COURT: DENNIS REINAKER, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
09/14/2006
COMPLAINT (2ND COMPLAINT) FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. COMPLAINT
PRESENTED TO COURT AND COURT ENTERS ORDER. (ORDER ENTRY FOLLOWS)
09/14/2006
IN FORMA PAUPERIS SECOND IFP FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
09/18/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. ON THIS DAY OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2006 UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE
ATTACHED PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE
PETITIONER, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, IS PERMITTED TO PROCEED WITH THE FILING OF
HIS/HER ACTION OR APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE
COSTS OR FEES PAYABLE IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH MATTER, BUT CONDITIONED UPON
HIS/HER PAYMENT OF SUCH COSTS FROM THE PROCEEDS OF AN FINANCIAL RECOVERY IN
THIS CASE. BY THE COURT: JOSEPH C. MADENSPACHER, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICE TO:
STAN CATERBONE
01/12/2007
04/03/2007

04/16/2007

SE.
04/24/2007

05/07/2007
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO STRIKE

PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF NON PROS. FILED BY: RONALD H. POLLACK, ESQ.
05/07/2007
MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANTS IN SUPPORT OF PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO

COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO STRIKE PRAECIPE FOR JUDGMENT OF NON PROS. FILED BY:
RONALD H. POLLACK, JR., ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
06/07/2007
PRAECIPE FILED TO ASSIGN DEFENDANT BENJAMIN RODA'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS

PURSUANT TO Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(4)/MOTION TO STRIKE PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
OF NON-PROS AS UNOPPOSED PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 1028(c)(4) WITH CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE. FILED BY: JULIE S. LEE, ESQ. (JUDGE ALLISON)
06/26/2007
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY: STANLEY J.

CATERBONE, PRO SE. (SENT TO BUSINESS JUDGE JUNE 28, 2007 - JUDGE CULLEN)

DOCKDETSPage
Page 272 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
07/03/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS

3RDJ.DAY
OF JULY,and
2007,
UPON
OF Se Billing File
Stan
Caterbone
Advanced
StanCONSIDERATION
Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE, AND PLAINTIFF HAVING FAILED TO PROVIDE THE
POSITION OF THE OPPOSING PARTY/COUNSEL, AND THE ATTACHMENT TO THE MOTION BEING
INSUFFICIENT TO SET FORTH THE SPECIFIC BASIS FOR THE REQUESTED RELIEF, IT IS
ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. BY THE COURT: JAMES P.
CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, JULIE S. LEE, ESQ.
07/05/2007
ORDER FILED. AND NOW, THIS 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2007, UPON CONSIDERATION OF
DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO STRIKE PRAECIPE
FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF NON PROS, THE MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
THEREOF, AND ANY OPPOSITION THERETO, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PRELIMINARY
OBJECTIONS ARE SUSTAINED AND THE PRAECIPE IS STRICKEN. ACCORDINGLY, THE ACTION
IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. BY THE COURT: PAUL K. ALLISON, JUDGE. CC'S W/236
NOTICES TO: RONALD H. POLLACK, JR., ESQ., STANLEY J. CATERBONE
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 273 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT (et al.)
Case Number
CI-07-00019

01/02/2007
PETITION - IFP- GENERAL TO PROCEED INFORMA PAUPERIS WITH AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL

SERVICE FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
01/02/2007
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE FILED STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
01/02/2007
PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE OF REAL ESTATE FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
01/02/2007
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS FULTON BANK, LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT
01/02/2007
COPY OF IN FORMA PAUPERIS; PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE (1) TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
01/04/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED: AND NOW, THIS 3rd DAY OF JANUARY, 2007, UPON CONSIDERATION OF
THE PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS FILED IN THIS MATTER, STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, IS GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. BY THE COURT: DENNIS E.
REINAKER, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE (2), SHAWN M. LONG,
ESQ., LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT.
01/05/2007
PETITION (ADDITION TO) TO SET ASIDE SALE OF REAL ESTATE - (NOTATION - PLEASE ADD TO
COMPLAINT). FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLTF. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME.
01/31/2007
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BEFORE BUSINESS JUDGE (JUDGE JAMES P. CULLEN) ON

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2007 @10:00 AM. FILED BY: SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ.
01/31/2007
RESPONSE OF FULTON BANK TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE OF

REAL ESTATE. FILED BY: SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
02/01/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND, NOW THIS 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2007, UPON CONSIDERATION
OF STANLEY CATERBONE'S PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE OF REAL ESTATE AND FULTON
BANK'S RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT SAID PETITION IS DENIED, WITH
PREJUDICE. ACCORDINGLY, THE SHERIFF IS DIRECTED TO MAKE THE SCHEDULED
DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS FROM THE DECEMBER 20, 2006 SHERIFF'S SALE OF THE
PROPERTY KNOWN AS 220 STONE HILL ROAD, CONESTOGA, PENNSYLVANIA AND TO DELIVER
THE SHERIFF'S DEED TO SUCH PROPERTY TO THE PURCHASER AT SUCH SHERIFF'S SALE. BY
THE COURT: MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICE SENT TO: SHAWN LONG,
ESQ.
02/06/2007
REPLY TO FULTON BANK'S RESPONSE TO PETITION TO SET ASIDE SALE. FILED BY: STANLEY J.
02/06/2007
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 1, 2007 ON STANLEY J. CATERBONE &

D. PAT ZIMMERMAN, ESQ. BY FIRST CLASS MAIL ON FEBRUARY 1, 2007. FILED BY: SHAWN M.
LONG, ESQ.
02/20/2007
LETTER FROM JAMES D. MCCULLOUGH, DEPUTY PROTHONOTARY, SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA.
RETURNED HEREIN IS THE NOTICE OF APPEAL RECEIVED IN THE PROTHONOTARY'S OFFICE,
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, FOR THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER TO BE
PERFECTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE:
PA.R.A.P. 551 THRU 561 FILING FEE/IFP ORDER/VERIFIED STATEMENT
PA.R.A.P. 906 SERVICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL TO ALL PARTIES
PA.R.A.P. 904(d) DOCKET ENTRIES REFLECTING ORDER APPEALING
PA.R.A.P. 905 ERRONEOUS FILING (RECEIVED IN SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ON
FEBRUARY 15, 2007).

DOCKDETSPage
Page 274 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
04/03/2007
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan AGAINST
Media
J. Caterbone,
JUDGMENT-NON PROS PRAECIPE FOR JUDGMENT
OF NON PROS
ENTERED
04/16/2007

SE.
04/24/2007

November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 275 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
LANCASTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (et al.)
Case Number
CI-07-00150

01/08/2007
PETITION - IFP- GENERAL AND AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS FILED BY STANLEY J.

CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE
01/08/2007
PETITION (EMERGENCY) FOR EMERGENCY FOOD STAMP BENEFITS AND OTHER BENEFITS
FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
01/08/2007
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, LANCASTER COUNTY ASSISTANCE OFFICE, MRS.
WIEGAND, LANCASTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
01/08/2007
COPY OF PEITITION FOR IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND PETITION TO PLAINTIFF.
01/09/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED: AND NOW, JANUARY 8, 2007, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S
REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, IT IS ORDERED THAT SUCH REQUEST IS
GRANTED. BY THE COURT: DENNIS E. REINAKER, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANELY J.
CATERBONE, THE PA. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WELFARE, THE LANC. COUNTY ASSISTANCE OFFICE,
MRS. WEIGLAND, CASE WORKER, THE LANC. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
01/16/2007
PRAECIPE-ENTER APPEARANCE OF DIANA CLARK, ESQ. FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC

WELFARE. FILED BY: DIANA CLARK, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
01/29/2007
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS FILED BY: DIANA C. CLARK, ESQ. PROOF OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
01/30/2007
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE.

FILED BY: DIANA C. CLARK, ESQ. PROOF OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
02/15/2007
ANSWER TO PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF JANUARY 26, 2007. FILED BY: STANLEY J.

CATERBONE, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
04/03/2007

04/03/2007

04/03/2007

04/16/2007

SE.
04/16/2007

SE.
04/16/2007

SE.
04/18/2007
PRAECIPE FILED TO ASSIGN PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS AND STRIKE CATERBONE'S PRAECIPE

FOR JUDGMENT OF NON PROS AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, AND ULTIMATELY SUSTAIN THE
DEPARTMENT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO THE COURT FOR DISPOSITION WITH PROOF OF
SERVICE. FILED BY: DIANA C. CLARK, ASSISTANT COUNSEL. (JUDGE CULLEN)
(ASSIGNED APRIL 19, 2007)
04/24/2007


DOCKDETSPage
Page 276 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05/29/2007
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BEFORE BUSINESS

JUDGE
WITH BRIEF
IN SUPPORT
ORDER
Stan J.
Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. OF
Caterbone,
Group,AND
Pro Se Billing File
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
08/06/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2007, THE PRAECIPE FOR
JUDGMENT OF NON PROS FILED APRIL 3, 2007, AND THE PRAECIPE FOR JUDGMENT OF NON
PROS FILED APRIL 16, 2007, ARE STRICKEN AS IMPROPERLY FILED SINCE DEFENDANT'S
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS WERE PENDING AT THE TIME OF FILING. BY THE COURT: JAMES
P. CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, DANA CLARK, ESQ.
10/30/2007
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER-NO FEE FILED. AND NOW, THIS 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2007,
UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PRELIMINARY
OBJECTIONS ARE SUSTAINED AND THE EMERGENCY PETITION FOR EMERGENCY FOOD STAMP
BENEFITS AND OTHER BENEFITS FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE AGAINST THE
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIIA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE IS DISMISSED. BY
THE COURT: JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, DIANA CLARK, ESQ.
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 277 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
LEO H ECKERT SR
Case Number
CI-07-00447

01/12/2007
PETITION - IFP- GENERAL FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE (JUDGE FARINA, 1-18-07)
01/12/2007
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS LEO H. ECKERT, JR
01/12/2007
COMPLAINT WRIT OF MANDAMUS FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
01/29/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) AND NOW, THIS 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2007, THE PETITION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY PLAINTIFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE IS DENIED PURSUANT TO PA.
R.C.P. 240(j) AS THE ACTION IS FRIVOLOUS. FOOTNOTE- PLAINTIFF SEEKS A WRIT OF
MANDAMUS "....TO VACATE THE DETAINER, AND DISMISS ALL CRIMINAL OFFENSES...." WHICH IS
RELIEF NOT AVAILABLE IN A CIVIL PROCEEDING BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR OTHERWISE. THE
RELIEF PLAINTIFF SEEKS MUST BE ADDRESSED IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS TO WHICH
THE MATTERS HE RAISES RELATE.
FILING FEES REMAINING UNPAID AT LEAST TEN DAYS AFTER THE RULE 236 NOTICE OF THE
DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF'S IN FORMA PAUPERIS PETITION, JUDGEMENT OF NON-PROS IN THE
ABOVE ACTION IS ENTERED PURSUANT TO PA. R.C.P. 240(c)(1)(ii).
01/29/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 29 DAY OF JANUARY, 2007, THE PETITION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY PLAINTIFF STANLEY J. CATERBONE IS DENIED
PURSUANT TO PA. R.C.P. 240(j) AS THE ACTION IS FRIVOLOUS. BY THE COURT: LOUIS J.
FARINA, PRESIDENT JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE LEO H. ECKERT, JR.
03/19/2007
PRAECIPE FILING FEES REMAINING UNPAID AT LEAST TEN DAYS AFTER THE RULE 236 NOTICE
OF THE DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF'S IN FORMA PAUPERIS PETITION, JUDGMENT OF NON-PROS IN
THE ABOVE ACTION IS ENTERED PURSUANT TO PA R.C.P. 240(c)(1)(ii)
03/19/2007
CASE STATUS-NON PROSSED
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 278 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
COMCAST CABLE
Case Number
CI-07-03442

04/18/2007
PETITION-APPEAL NUNC PRO TUNC (APPLICATION) FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NUNC PRO TUNC
FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, APPELLANT
04/18/2007
PETITION - IFP- GENERAL (APPLICATION) TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY STANLEY

J. CATERBONE, APPELLANT
04/20/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) PLAINTIFF HAS FILED AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NUNC PRO
TUNC THE DECISION RENDERED ON JULY 20, 2006, BY MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE KELLY J.
BALLENTINE. PLAINTIFF HAS INCORRECTLY LISTED THE DOCKET NUMBER FOR THE REQUEST
AND HAS PROVIDED INSUFFICIENT REASONS JUSTIFYING HIS REQUEST. PLAINTIFF'S
APPLICATION IS, THEREFORE, DENIED. APRIL 20, 2007. BY THE COURT, DENNIS REINAKER,
JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ROBERT D. KODAK, ESQ.
04/20/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) PLAINTIFF HAS FILED AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS WHICH INCORRECTLY CAPTIONS A CRIMINAL CASE IN WHICH PLAINTIFF IS
APPARENTLY INVOLVED. IT APPEARS, HOWEVER, THAT THE REQUEST PERTAINS TO THE
MATTER CAPTIONED HEREIN. PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PA. R.C.P. 240 (J), THE
APPLICATION IS DENIED AS BEING FRIVOLOUS. BY THE COURT, DENNIS REINAKER, JUDGE.
APRIL 20, 2007. COPIES W/236 NOTICE TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ROBERT D. KODAK, ESQ.
12/13/2010
02/14/2011
02/28/2011
MAIL RETURNED NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF COURT CASE ADDRESSED TO SUSAN GIBSON.

NO SUCH NUMBER, UNABLE TO FORWARD.
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 279 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor

vs.
COPY MAX (et al.)
Case Number
CI-07-03924

05/01/2007
PETITION - IFP- GENERAL (APPLICATION) FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH
FINANCIAL STATUS FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF
05/01/2007
COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF.
05/01/2007
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP VS SAM LOMBARDO,
COPY MAX
05/01/2007
COPY OF COMPLAINT (4) BACK TO PLAINTIFF
05/04/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AFFIDAVIT, AND CIVIL COMPLAINT, THE COURT NOTES
THAT EACH DOCUMENT CONTAINS A DIFFERENT CAPTION USING DIFFERENT PERSONS AS
PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT. ACCORDING, THE APPLICATION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
TO THE APPLICANT'S RIGHT TO RESUBMIT IT AND THE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT WITH
CONSISTENT CAPTIONS. BY THE COURT, JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICE
TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, SAM LOMBARDO, COPY MAX.
05/07/2007
PETITION - IFP- GENERAL (BY APPLICATION) FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
WITH FINANCIAL INFORMATION FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF. RESUBMITTED
PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED MAY 4, 2007 - MB
05/09/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, 9TH DAY OF MAY 2007, UPON PRESENTATION AND
CONSIDERATION OF THE APPLICATION TO FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS, IT IS HEREBY GRANTED.
BY THE COURT, MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, SENIOR JUDGE. COPIES W/236 NOTICES TO: STANELY
CATERBONE, SAM LOMBARDO, COPY MAX
05/24/2007
PRAECIPE-ENTER APPEARANCE OF SAMUEL W. CORTES, ESQ. AND FOR ROTHSCHILD LLP ON

BEHALF OF DEFENDANT, SAMUEL LOMBARDO. FILED BY: SAMUEL CORTES, ESQ. CERTIFICATE
OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
05/29/2007
ANSWER TO CIVIL COMPLAINT OF OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED. FILED BY: KRISTIN L. WORLEY,

ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
05/29/2007
PRAECIPE-ENTER APPEARANCE OF KRISTEN L. WORLEY, ESQ. ON BEHALF OF OFFICEMAX

INCORPORATED. FILED BY: KRISTEN L. WORLEY, ESQ.
05/31/2007
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT, SAMUEL LOMBARDO, TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT.

FILED BY: SAMUEL D. CORTES, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF THE SAME.
06/25/2007
PRAECIPE FILED TO ASSIGN THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT, SAMUEL

LOMBARDO, TO THE COMPLAINT OF PLAINTIFFS, STANLEY CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP TO THE COURT FOR DISPOSITION WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY: SAMUEL
W. CORTES, ESQ. (JUDGE REINAKER)
06/25/2007
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED BY: STANLEY J.

CATERBONE, PRO SE. (SENT TO BUSINESS JUDGE JUNE 27, 2007 - JUDGE ASHWORTH CONFLICT)
(SENT TO BUSINESS JUDGE JUNE 28, 2007 - JUDGE CULLEN)

DOCKDETSPage
Page 280 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
06/29/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS

28TH
OF JUNE,
2007,
UPON
OF Se Billing File
Stan
J.DAY
Caterbone
and
Advanced
StanCONSIDERATION
Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE, AND PLAINTIFF HAVING FAILED TO STATE A REASON
FOR HIS REQUEST, OR THE POSITION OF THE OPPOSING PARTIES, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE
MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFF'S RIGHT TO RESUBMIT IT BY
PROVIDING A REASON FOR THE RELIEF REQUESTED AND THE POSITION OF THE OPPOSING
PARTIES. BY THE COURT: JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, SAMUEL W. CORTES, ESQ., KRISTEN L. WORLEY, ESQ.
07/24/2007
CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE MADENSPACHER JULY 24, 2007.
07/24/2007
ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. CERTIFICATE OF

07/25/2007
CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE CULLEN ON JULY 25, 2007.
07/25/2007
PRAECIPE TO SUBSTITUTE VERIFICATION OF JUSTIN PRESTON, OF OFFICEMAX INC. FOR THE

ATTORNEY VERIFICATION OF KRISTEN L. WORLEY DEFENDANT'S ANSWER, NEW MATTER, &
NEW MATTER CROSSCLAIM. FILED BY: KRISTEN L. WORLEY, ESQ.
07/27/2007
ANSWER TO NOTICE FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE,

PRO SE.
08/24/2007
MOTION OF DEFENDANT, COPY MAX, FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF COUNSEL WITH
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY: KRISTEN L. WORLEY, ESQ. OF MAYFIELD, TURNER,
O'MARA, DONNELLY & MCBRIDE. (SENT TO JUDGE CULLEN AUGUST 24, 2007)
09/14/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2007, IT IS ORDERED AND
DECREED THAT THE INSTANT MOTION IS GRANTED. (SEE FILE FOR COMPLETE DETAILS). BY
THE COURT: JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236 NOTICE TO: KRISTEN L. WORLEY, ESQ.
-2.
09/26/2007
OPINION AND ORDER FILED. AND NOW, THIS 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2007, UP0N
CONSIDERATION OF THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS FILED BY DEFENDANT, SAMUEL
LOMBARDO, THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. THE FIRST PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
CHALLENGING THE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY OF THAT CAUSE OF THE ACTION FOR DEFAMATION IS
SUSTAINED. 2. THE SECOND PRELIMINARY OBJECTION CHALLENGING THE LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR CIVIL EXTORTION IS SUSTAINED. 3. THE THIRD
PRELIMINARY OBJECTION CHALLENGING IMPROPER SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT IS
SUSTAINED. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO
FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WHICH MUST BE SERVED AS REQUIRED BY THE PENNSYLVANIA
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. BY THE COURT: JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236
NOTICE TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE -1, KRISTEN L. WORLEY, ESQ -1, SAMEUL W. CORTES,
ESQ. -1, FRANCIS X. DONNELLY, ESQ. -1.
09/28/2007
SETTLEMENT JOINT TORTFEASOR RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. FILED BY STANLY

J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
10/15/2007
MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT TO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT. FILED BY: STANLEY J.

10/22/2007
OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANT SAMUEL LOMBARDO, TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS

COMPLAINT TO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT, FILED BY SAMUEL W. CORTES, ESQ.
10/26/2007
JUDGMENT-NON PROS PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF NON PROS AGAINST

PLAINTIFFS FOR FAILURE TO FILE COMPLAINT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY:
SAMUEL W. CORTES, ESQ. (SENT TO JUDGE CULLEN OCTOBER 29, 2007)
11/07/2007
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2007, UPON CONSIDERATION
OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT TO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT, AND
DEFENDANT SAMUEL LOMBARDO'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS
COMPLAINT TO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT, AND PLAINTIFFS HAVING FAILED TO PROVIDE
ANY AUTHORITY FOR THE RELIEF REQUESTED, IT IS ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IS
DENIED. BY THE COURT: JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE. COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE: STANLEY J.
CATERBONE & SAMUEL W. CORTES, ESQ.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 281 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
11/07/2007
ORDER FILED. AND NOW, THIS 5TH DAYStan

OF NOVEMBER,
2007,
UPON
CONSIDERATION
OF THE
J. Caterbone
and
Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF NON PROS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS FOR FAILURE TO
FILE COMPLAINT, AND IT APPEARING TO THE COURT FROM THE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
THAT PLAINTIFFS WERE MAILED A COPY OF THE PRAECIPE ON OCTOBER 19, 2007, AND THAT
PLAINTIFFS HAVE NOT FILED AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AS DIRECTED BY THIS COURT'S ORDER
OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2007, IS IT ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT OF NON PROS IS ENTERED AGAINST
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THIS
COURT'S ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2007. BY THE COURT: JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE. COPIES
WITH 236 NOTICE: STANLEY J. CATERBONE & SAMUEL W. CORTES, ESQ. JUDGMENT ENTERED
AS DIRECTED, RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
MAILED TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE, KRISTEN L. WORLEY, ESQ. & SAMUEL W. CORTES, ESQ.
11/19/2007
PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OF NON PROS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION
WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. (SENT TO JUDGE
CULLEN NOVEMBER 21, 2007)
11/28/2007
ORDER ISSUING RULE FILED. AND NOW, THIS 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2007, UPON
CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS' PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OF NON PROS, A
RULE IS ENTERED ON DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE RELIEF REQUESTED SHOULD
NOT BE GRANTED. RULE RETURNABLE IN TWENTY (20) DAYS. BY THE COURT: JAMES P.
CULLEN, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, SAMUEL W. CORTES,
ESQ.
12/17/2007
OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANT SAMUEL LOMBARDO TO PLAINTIFF'S PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT OF NON PROS. FILED BY: SAMUEL W. CORTES, ESQ. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF
THE SAME.
01/14/2008
ORDER (NO FEE)
01/14/2008
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2008, UPON CONSIDERATION
OF PLAINTIFF'S PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OF NON PROS AND THE RESPONSE
OF DEFENDANT, SAMUEL LOMBARDO, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PETITION IS DENIED FOR LACK
OF JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO 42 PA. C.S. 5505. BY THE COURT: JAMES P. CULLEN, JUDGE.
CC'S WITH 236 NOTICE TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. AND SAMUEL W. CORTES, ESQ.
04/07/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT B FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, PLAINTIFF
04/15/2009
ORDER (NO FEE) ENTERED AND FILED. AND NOW, THIS 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2009, BASED UPON
THE ATTACHED FORENSIC REPORT, AND IT APPEARING THAT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS
ACCEPTED BY THE PROTHONOTARY FOR FILING WERE SIGNED IN HUMAN BLOOD, THE
PROTHONOTARY IS DIRECTED TO STRIKE THE FILING OF THOSE DOCUMENTS FROM THE CIVIL
DOCKET RECORD AND IT IS FURTHER DIRECTED THAT THEY REMAIN, IN THE INTEREST OF
PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND FOR ANY APPROPRIATE LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION, IN THE
CUSTODY OF THE OFFICE OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY DETECTIVES AND THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY. THE DOCUMENTS AT CI-08-13373 ARE: "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT W" , "MOTION TO
FILE EXHIBIT X" , "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT Y" THE DOCUMENT AT CI-07-03924 IS: "MOTION TO
FILE EXHIBIT Z" UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF COURT NO DOCUMENTS FROM THE PLAINTIFF,
ACTING PRO SE, SHALL BE ACCEPTED FOR FILING UNTIL THEY HAVE BEEN INSPECTED BY AND
CLEARED AS FREE OF HEALTH HAZARDOUS TAINT BY THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. BY THE
COURT: LOUIS J. FARINA, PRESIDENT JUDGE COPIES W/236 NOTICE HAND DELIVERED TO:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, JAN WALTERS, COUNTY DETECTIVE, RANDALL WENGER,
PROTHONOTARY, TERRY BERGMAN, SHERIFF, AND MAILED TO STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
(ORIGINAL ORDER FILED IN CASE NO. CI-08-13373)

DOCKDETSPage
Page 282 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
04/20/2009
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THISStan

17THJ.DAY
OF APRIL,and
2009,
THEStan
ORDER
ISSUED
APRIL
Caterbone
Advanced
Media
J. Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
15, 2009 IS VACATED AND SUBSTITUTED WITH THE FOLLOWING: CORRECTIVE ORDER: AND
NOW, THIS 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2009, BASED UPON THE ATTACHED FORENSIC REPORT, AND IT
APPEARING THAT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ACCEPTED BY THE PROTHONOTARY FOR
FILING WERE SIGNED IN HUMAN BLOOD, THE PROTHONOTARY IS DIRECTED TO STRIKE THE
FILING OF THOSE DOCUMENTS FROM THE CIVIL DOCKET RECORD AND IT IS FURTHER
DIRECTED THAT THEY REMAIN, IN THE INTEREST OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND FOR
ANY APPROPRIATE LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION, IN THE CUSTODY OF THE OFFICE OF THE
LANCASTER COUNTY DETECTIVES AND THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY. THE DOCUMENTS
DOCKETED TO CI-08-13373 ARE: "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT W" , "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT X",
"MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT Y", AND "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT Z". UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF
COURT NO DOCUMENTS FROM THE PLAINTIFF, ACTING PRO SE, SHALL BE ACCEPTED FOR
FILING UNTIL THEY BEEN INSPECTED BY AND CLEARED AS FREE OF HEALTH HAZARDOUS
TAINT BY THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. BY THE COURT: LOUIS J. FARINA, PRESIDENT JUDGE,
COPIES W/236 NOTICE TO: DISTRICT ATTORNEY (HAND DELIVERED) / JAN WALTERS, COUNTY
DETECTIVE (HAND DELIVERED), RANDALL WENGER, PROTHONOTARY (IN FILE-CI-07-03924)
TERRY BERGMAN, SHERIFF (HAND DELIVERED), STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, (MAILED)
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 283 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, Pro Se Billing File
MAYFIELD , TURNER, O'MARA, D ONNELLY & MCB RIDE

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW
+
DAVID M. MAYFIELD
LINTON W. TURNER, JR.**
+
MICHAEL J. OMARA
+
FRANCIS X. DONNELLY
W. THOMAS MCBRIDE*
+
TRICIA E. HABERT
JAMES P. KEAVENEY*
JOHN V. PETRYCKI, JR.*
_____________________
KRISTEN L. WORLEY*
CHRISTINE D. McGUIRE*
KAREN A. MASCIOLI*
VERONICA M. NELSON*
JENNIFER L. STRATIS*
ROBERT J. GILLISPIE, JR.
EBONY L. JOHNSON*
JADE M. MOUSTAKAS*
1617 J.F.K. BOULEVARD

SUITE 932
PHILADELPHIA , PENNSYLVANIA 19103
TELEPHONE (215) 564-0500
FAX (215) 564-2212
WWW.MAYFIELDTURNER.COM
2201 ROUTE 38
SUITE 300
CHERRY HILL, NJ 08002
(856) 667-2600
FAX (856) 667-8787
OF COUNSEL:
G. PAUL CRAWSHAW
* Also admitted in NJ
**Also admitted in NJ & VA
+
Only admitted in NJ
September 10, 2007

Honorable James P. Cullen
County of Lancaster
50 N. Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17608-3480
RE:
Caterbone v. Copy Max, et al.

No. CI-07-03924
Our File No. 7108-06
Dear Judge Cullen:

This office represents defendant, OfficeMax Incorporated, in connection
with the above -captioned matter.
The plaintiff and Office Max Incorporated have reached a settlement with
respect to plaintiffs claims against said defendant. As part of the parties
Settlement Agreement, the parties have agreed to place the terms of the
settlement on record before the Court.
I am aware that Your Honor has been assigned the managing Judge with
respect to this matter. The plaintiff, Mr. Stanley Caterbone, has advised that he
objects to Your Honor presiding over the Settlement Hearing which the
defendant will be scheduling pursuant to the parties Settlement Agreement. As
such, Mr. Caterbone has requested that Your Honor be recused from
conducting the foregoing Settlement Hearing and that said hearing be
conducted by another Judge. In an attempt accommodate Mr. Caterbones
reservations, and to resolve this matter as expeditiously as possible, I am
respectfully requesting that Your Honor transfer the Settlement Hearing to
another Judge. I anticipate that the hearing will be very brief, taking no more
than ten (10) to fifteen (15) minutes of the Courts time.
LOCAL, STATE, & FEDERAL COURT DOCKETS Page 284 of 811
Sunday November 13, 2016
Honorable James P. Cullen

PAGE TWO
September 10, 2007
If Your Honor requires any additional information in consideration of the
instant request, please feel free to contact my office, I would be happy to
facilitate the production thereof to Your Honor.
I again appreciate the Courts kind consideration of this request.
Very truly yours,
MAYFIELD, TURNER, OMARA,
DONNELLY & MCBRIDE, P.C.
By: _________________________________
KRISTEN L. WORLEY
KLW/ka
cc:
Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone
Samuel W. Cortes, Esquire
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
305
11of
of
of51
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday November
December 17,
13, 2015
2016

scaterbone@live.com
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
Page
306
12of
2
of
of
1 51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
307
23of
3
of
of51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016
Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246
District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664
May 21, 2009

To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.
Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
308
34of
4
of
of51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
Page
309
45of
5
of
of
2 51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016

For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
Page
310
56of
6
of
of
3 51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016

(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
Page
311
67of
7
of
of
4 51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016

mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
Page
312
78of
8
of
of
5 51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016
Richmond council passes resolution

supporting ban on space-based
weapons
May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
Page
313
89of
9
of
of
8 51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016
dumb ideas, Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:
1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

weapons
2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments
1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
314
10
910of
of
9of50
51
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
October 10, 2015
Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
315
10
11
ofof41
50
51
811
51
Page
111of
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010
Date Updated:
October 10, 2015
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
July 28, 2009

July 8, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
316
11
12
ofof41
50
51
811
51
Page
212of
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.
From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.
The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.
And Again, the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.
The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct
witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert.
In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
317
12
13
ofof41
50
51
811
51
Page
313of
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.
However, this time there was
no
MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
The Complaint contained
allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.
The Lancaster City Police
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.
The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
318
13
14
ofof41
50
51
811
51
Page
414of
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45
audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone.
In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.
Phil interviewed all living
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
319
14
15
ofof41
50
51
811
51
Page
515of
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.
After discussions with ISC and United
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.
However, money, power,
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.
This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.
Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.
This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
INTERNATIONAL
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
320
15
16
ofof41
50
51
811
51
Page
616of
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
321
16
17
ofof41
50
51
811
51
Page
717of
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.
THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;
burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape.
uncovered and discovered to this day.
Information and findings are still being
Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
322
17
18
ofof41
50
51
811
51
Page
818of
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges.
During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least
twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.
This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
323
18
19
ofof41
50
51
811
51
Page
919of
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND

WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.
See attached documents for
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
324
19
20
20of
of51
50
811
51
Page
10
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.
He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and
Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
325
20
21
21of
of51
50
811
51
Page
11
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.
He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.
His
viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
In 1973 Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.
The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never
entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.
However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.
On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an
inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate.
The check was for some $70,000.00.
The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.
He was in perfect
health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,
former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
326
21
22
22of
of51
50
811
51
Page
12
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.
By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.
Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Lancaster Catholic High School.
After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an
unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November.
While in the woods in
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.
It left him in the
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.
The
The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.
Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and
landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.
John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by
James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
327
22
23
23of
of51
50
811
51
Page
13
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.
Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first
beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..
Over the
years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.
The same was true of his businesses.
Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.
There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;
every instance of the word
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
328
23
24
24of
of51
50
811
51
Page
14
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as
plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate
PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.freedomffchs.com
https://www.scribd.com
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
329
24
25
25of
of51
50
811
51
Page
15
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW

** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently
been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are
using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.
This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television
drama "Medium" this last season.
On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live
broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
The following are no longer in service:
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
330
25
26
26of
of51
50
811
51
Page
16
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
331
26
27
27of
of51
50
811
51
Page
17
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.
Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a supersecret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
332
27
28
28of
of51
50
811
51
Page
18
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
333
28
29
29of
of51
50
811
51
Page
19
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
334
29
30
30of
of51
50
811
51
Page
20
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:
I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.
The
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.
Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
335
21
30
31
31ofof51
41
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Saturday,
Friday,November
December
October 10,
11,
17,
13, 2015
2016
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
336
31
32
32ofof51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
337
32
33
33ofof51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
338
33
34
34ofof51
50
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December 11,
17,
13, 2015
2016
scaterbone@live.com
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
December 6, 2015
Work-In-Progress
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
339
35
35ofof51
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday November
December 17,
13, 2015
2016
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian
Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on my
Wordpress Blog.
20.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
22.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
23.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
24.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
25.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.
26.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Nortwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,
Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged in
Discrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to Legal
Counsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.
Dated: December 6, 2015
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
340
36
36ofof51
811
51
Thursday,
Sunday November
December 17,
13, 2015
2016
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
341
36
37
37of
of51
50
811
51
Page
27
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
342
37
38
38of
of51
50
811
51
Page
28
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
343
38
39
39of
of51
50
811
51
Page
29
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
! "
"
$% &
!
" #
%
"&#
(
'
!
(
,
"
"
")
"
""
-
)
!
! "
!
'
%
" !
"
!
)
+
!
" *
"
"
,
,
,
*
%
*
(
%
!
/"0
1
1 ,
"
"
4
!
"
"
!
!
#
.
.
&,,0
%
1 ,
2"3
!
)
** ! "
&,,..$/
&,,
%
&,,
%
&
, "
"
00
"
!,
"
6
7
7 , !
&,,-
8,
:
(
$;$
"2
! " ,
, ,
** !
;
5
$
!
&,,@
,
.
&<;=
>
1
9
,
&,,=
$
,
>
A
1 B3
.+
&,,=
1 B3
2
>
%
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
344
39
40
40of
of51
50
811
51
Page
30
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
<
1
1
* "
!
"
C#
"$
"
<
*
&, ,
24
#9
; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%
&,,0 4
! %3
"
"
!
&,,
%
!
4
'
5
4
D
%
%
"
""
,! "
0 =
0 =9
9
00&9 00
:
9
&,,-
&, , $
!
%
!
D
%
%
=
F
!
))
+
/4
),
"
0 =
/
$
G
3
%
00
3
3
"
%#
$
$
&, ,
&,,4
!- "
.
&,,@
,
*
&,,<
E
&,,
-) !
/ 4
24
/
$
D
&, ,
D
$
&,,-
&,,0
%
D
!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D
$
A
8F
$
%
;
D
.
%
&,,3
E
$
*
00=; 00
$
5
! 7
0 =
00
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
345
40
41
41of
of51
50
811
51
Page
31
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
)
A
24
$;$
00
(F
&
%
B
5
00 9
" * <
00=( 00 9
:#
> ) "" ""

$
;3
#, " !
&,,-
"
"
"
0 =
&, ,
/
.
$
B
3
3
=
0 =
) "
.
&,,1
0 =
24
" "
3
"
&,,@
" E
""
B
$
<
&,,1
.
&,,-
,-(&&
2
=
@,
"
&,
3
&,,!
&,,@
&,,@
0 =
@, 1
&,,@
9
!
@,
#" !,
0 =
" "1 ,
"
"*
":
" E
F
&,,-
!
B
/
!
"
00=( 00 9
B
:
9
$
'
.
&,,1
9
0 =
&, ,
/
.
00 9
/
&,,9
&,
( "
!
.
00
$
!
&, ,
F
3
7
8
!
&,,
&, ,
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
346
41
42
42of
of51
50
811
51
Page
32
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
&
, * "
&&
*#
"
&:
;!
&<
:
%
$
&, ,
$
&,,-
!-
,
5
%
"
>
$
$
< !-
24
? "
;
>
&,,0
B
&,,%
(
$
&, ,
&-
A
.+ $
&@
! :
&,,$
: , *
&, ,
* @
&,,@
"
E
3
&,,
"
&,,0
7 "!
7 "
0 =
*
&=
) "
":
)"
&,,@
"
&
&0
!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,
00
:,
!6
"
"
" .
9 &,,0
0 = "&#
, *
&,,@
/
" F
0 =
;A
0 =
F
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
347
42
43
43of
of51
50
811
51
Page
33
of
41
0 =
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

!
3
"
$
+
$
.
0 =
I $
!
0 =
.
$
"2
'
+$;F
D
"$
&,;&,
3
A
00
'
$ 24
"1E1# $
K
E
A
00&
>
L
F
F
B
F
+
0=,K
A
$
$
1
+
>
1
$
>
B
!
3
F
1
00
) % 3
&,,-
!
>
! A !
00,K
1 B3
>
F
F
& 1
F
8
! 4
'
A
! 4
A
0=,K
F
00,K
0 ,K
0<,K
3
/
>
%
&,,
) %$
0@,K
0@,K
$
2!
A
D 1
"
$
0 <9 F
4
A? D!B
#
*
$
7
+
00
D 18
.
E
$
M 1
00= E
0 =
%
0 ,K
$
0 =
M
00
!
&,,9
(
9
!
1
,-(
$ !2B+EF2
(&&
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
348
43
44
44of
of51
50
811
51
Page
34
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
") !
"
7!
N
.
!
5
F
(
(
5
G
*
A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!
,
B
A
" " * #" !, " "
$C
* #" !, D
73
8
* 7
,
"
"
&
"
#
.
"
#(
5
7
9
'
5
%
7A
8 !
8 !
'
!
7D .2
O
% 8
'
7
'
(
(
%
%
4
K
K
M %
%
K
'
7E
(
8
"
%
'
%(
(
(
4
;
(
7
7
87
(
(
8
8
- 7 > !,
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
349
44
45
45of
of51
50
811
51
Page
35
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,

!
* , "
!
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B
@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
B@
)
B@
DD
!
!
))
1"
)
*
!
")
1
3
1
"
)
)
, "
*"
"
, "
!
*
"
")
"
7
"!
"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "
*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !
)
*
"E
DD
")
E DD
%
,
!
!"
, "
"
"
"
1 ,"
DD
*)
PPPPPPP "
>7
%#
'?
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
June 19, 2015

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP
15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.
I
&, ,
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
350
45
46
46of
of51
50
811
51
Page
36
of
41
Don't Know When
24
$
$
Q &, , "!
I
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
351
46
47
47of
of51
50
811
51
Page
37
of
41
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page 35 of 41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
06/10/2007
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
352
47
48
48of
of51
50
811
51
Page
38
of
41
Page 36 of 41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
06/10/2007
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
353
48
49
49of
of51
50
811
51
Page
39
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
354
49
50
50of
of51
50
811
51
Page
40
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
AdvancedSTATE,
LOCAL,
Medi Group
Media
Grop
Group
& FEDERAL
Press
PressRelease
Release
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
Page
355
50
51
51of
of51
50
811
51
Page
41
of
41
Thursday,
Sunday
Friday,November
December
11,
17,
13, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October 10,
CHAPTER
DIVIDER

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor

vs.
ALDULT PROBATION & PAROLE SERVICE (et al.)
Case Number
CI-08-05635

05/21/2008
APPLICATION (NO FEES) FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. FILED BY STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, PRO SE PLAINTIFF.
(SENT TO BUSINESS JUDGE REINAKER 5-23-08)
05/21/2008
AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE PLAINTIFF.
05/21/2008
COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE PLAINTIFF.
05/21/2008
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP VS.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF
DRIVER LICENSING AND BEVERLY J. POINTS, ADMINISTRATIVE COUNSEL-IN-CHARGE VEHICLE
AND TRAFFIC LAW DIVISION, PENNSYVLANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL AND ERICA C. WEITZEL, ADULT PROBATION & PAROLE SERVICE, COUNTY OF
COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY
05/23/2008
ADDENDUM TO EXHIBITS. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE PLAINTIFF.
05/27/2008
ORDER (NO FEE) PLAINTIFF HAS FILED AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS. AFTER REVIEWING THE ALLEGATIONS, THE MATTER IS DEEMED TO BE FRIVOLOUS.
THE APPLICATION IS, THEREFORE, DENIED. BY THE COURT: DENNIS E. REINAKER, JUDGE.
COPIES TO: STANLEY J. CATERBONE (1) BEVERLY POINTS, ESQ. (1) ERICA C. WEITZEL (1)
06/05/2008
PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW AND NOW ON THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2008, PLAINTIFF STANLEY J.
CATERBONE HEREBY FILES A PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW THE ABOVE CAPTIONED COMPLAINT
AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS NAMED HEREIN. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF.
06/05/2008
CASE STATUS: OTHER
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 357
284 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor

vs.
DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER AT LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY (et al.)
Case Number
CI-08-13373

12/03/2008
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE.
12/03/2008
CAPTION ENTRY IS: ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, STAN J. CATERBONE VS DUKE STREET
BUSINESS CENTER AT LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY, DIANE PAWLING BUSINESS REFERENCE
LINRARIAN OF DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER, BILL HUDSON DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR/IT
MANAGER LIBRARY SYSTEM OF LANCASTER COUNTY, LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY,
LANCASTER PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM, HIGH FOUNDATION, UNIDENTIFIED BUSINESS
REFERENCE LIBRARIAN DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER
12/03/2008
COMPLAINT FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
12/03/2008
COPY OF COMPLAINT(1) HANDED TO PLAINTIFF AT COUNTER ON 12/3/O8.
12/04/2008
EXHIBITS EXHIBIT C FILED. BY: STANLEY M. CATERBONE, PRO SE
12/08/2008
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2008, UPON PRESENTATION
AND CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED INFORMATION, REGARDING THE REQUEST OF
STANLEY J. CATERBONE TO FILE IFP SAID REQUEST IS GRANTED. BY THE COURT: JOSEPH C.
MADENSPACHER, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236 NOTICE TO: BEVERLY J. POINTS, ESQ., STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, (6)
12/31/2008
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT. COMPLAINT REINSTATED AS DIRECTED. RANDALL

O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
01/28/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT. REINSTATED AS DIRECTED BY RANDALL O. WENGER,

PROTHONOTARY. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
02/09/2009
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT C FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
02/11/2009
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT D FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
02/12/2009
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT E FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
02/20/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT F,G,H,I TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE FILED BY:
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP.
02/26/2009

03/10/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT J FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/11/2009
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT K FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/12/2009
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT L FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/18/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT M FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/24/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT N FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/24/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE PLAINTIFF.

REINSTATED AS REQUESTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
03/26/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT O FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/27/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT P FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 358
285 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
04/01/2009
Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan
J.
Caterbone,
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBITS Q;R;S;T;U;VStan
FILEDJ.BY
STAN J. CATERBONE,
PROMedia
SE.
04/09/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A1 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/15/2009
ORDER (NO FEE) ENTERED AND FILED. AND NOW, THIS 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2009, BASED UPON
THE ATTACHED FORENSIC REPORT, AND IT APPEARING THAT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS
ACCEPTED BY THE PROTHONOTARY FOR FILING WERE SIGNED IN HUMAN BLOOD, THE
PROTHONOTARY IS DIRECTED TO STRIKE THE FILING OF THOSE DOCUMENTS FROM THE CIVIL
DOCKET RECORD AND IT IS FURTHER DIRECTED THAT THEY REMAIN, IN THE INTEREST OF
PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND FOR ANY APPROPRIATE LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION, IN THE
CUSTODY OF THE OFFICE OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY DETECTIVES AND THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY. THE DOCUMENTS AT CI-08-13373 ARE: "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT W" , "MOTION TO
FILE EXHIBIT X" , "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT Y" THE DOCUMENT AT CI-07-03924 IS: "MOTION TO
FILE EXHIBIT Z" UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF COURT NO DOCUMENTS FROM THE PLAINTIFF,
ACTING PRO SE, SHALL BE ACCEPTED FOR FILING UNTIL THEY HAVE BEEN INSPECTED BY AND
CLEARED AS FREE OF HEALTH HAZARDOUS TAINT BY THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. BY THE
COURT: LOUIS J. FARINA, PRESIDENT JUDGE COPIES W/236 NOTICE HAND DELIVERED TO:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, JAN WALTERS, COUNTY DETECTIVE, RANDALL WENGER,
PROTHONOTARY, TERRY BERGMAN, SHERIFF, AND MAILED TO STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
04/17/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT W FILED BY: STANLELY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

FILING DATE APRIL 17, 2009 AT 11:41 A.M.)
04/17/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT Y FILED BY: STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
04/17/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT X FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
04/20/2009
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2009, THE ORDER ISSUED APRIL
15, 2009 IS VACATED AND SUBSTITUTED WITH THE FOLLOWING: CORRECTIVE ORDER: AND
NOW, THIS 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2009, BASED UPON THE ATTACHED FORENSIC REPORT, AND IT
APPEARING THAT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ACCEPTED BY THE PROTHONOTARY FOR
FILING WERE SIGNED IN HUMAN BLOOD, THE PROTHONOTARY IS DIRECTED TO STRIKE THE
FILING OF THOSE DOCUMENTS FROM THE CIVIL DOCKET RECORD AND IT IS FURTHER
DIRECTED THAT THEY REMAIN, IN THE INTEREST OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND FOR
ANY APPROPRIATE LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION, IN THE CUSTODY OF THE OFFICE OF THE
LANCASTER COUNTY DETECTIVES AND THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY. THE DOCUMENTS
DOCKETED TO CI-08-13373 ARE: "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT W" , "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT X",
"MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT Y", AND "MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT Z". UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF
COURT NO DOCUMENTS FROM THE PLAINTIFF, ACTING PRO SE, SHALL BE ACCEPTED FOR
FILING UNTIL THEY BEEN INSPECTED BY AND CLEARED AS FREE OF HEALTH HAZARDOUS
TAINT BY THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. BY THE COURT: LOUIS J. FARINA, PRESIDENT JUDGE,
COPIES W/236 NOTICE TO: DISTRICT ATTORNEY (HAND DELIVERED) / JAN WALTERS, COUNTY
DETECTIVE (HAND DELIVERED), RANDALL WENGER, PROTHONOTARY (IN FILE-CI-07-03924)
TERRY BERGMAN, SHERIFF (HAND DELIVERED), STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, (MAILED)
04/21/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A2 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/23/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT Z FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/23/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT ORGINALLY FILED ON DECEMBER 3, 2008 FILED BY:
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, PLAINTIFF
REINSTATED AS DIRECTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY
04/27/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-4 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/27/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-3 FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/27/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBITS A-5 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
04/30/2009
05/06/2009
05/18/2009
PRAECIPE TO RENAME EXHIBIT A-5 OF MAY 6, 2009 TO EXHIBIT A-7 FILED BY STAN J.
CATERBONE.
05/18/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-8 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE.
05/20/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-9 FILED.
05/22/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. REINSTATED AS

REQUESTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY

DOCKDETSPage
Page 359
286 of 811
499
(CORRECT
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
06/03/2009
Stan
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-10. FILED BY:
STAN
J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE.
06/08/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-11. FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
06/09/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE PLAINTIFF.

REINSTATED AS REQUESTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY AND ADD THE
FOLLOWING PARTIES TO THE CAPTION: DR. AMINTA HAWKINS-BREAN, PH.D., VICE PRESIDENT
STUDENT AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, JODIE RICHARDSON, SECRETARY OF STUDENT
AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, LORI B. AUSTIN, DIRECTOR OF JUDICIAL AFFAIRS,
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, VICTOR DESANTIS, DIRECTOR, GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEACH
PROGRAM, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, MARJORIE M. WARMKESSLER, PH.D. HUMANTIES
LIBRARIAN AND LIBRARIAN INSTRUCTION COORDINATOR, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY,
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, NATHANIEL
BOMBERGER, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT, P. MICHAEL STURLA, PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES, JOHN ROCHAT, CHIEF OF POLICE, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE
DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
06/09/2009
06/11/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBT A-13. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 360
287 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
06/15/2009
AMENDED CAPTION ENTRY IS: ADVANCED

MEDIA
GROUP / STAN
CATERBONE
VS. Group,
DUKE Pro Se Billing File
Stan
J. Caterbone
and J.
Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
STREET BUSINESS CENTER, ET AL, LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, COLLEGE
AVENUE, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, DR. L. WENGER, LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL
CENTER, WEIS MARKETS, SADSBURY, PENNSYLVANIA, WEIS PHARMACY SADSBURY,
PENNSYLVANIA, AMY BRENT, PHARMICIST, DISTRICT MANAGER, WEIS MARKET, CVS
PHARMACY, MANOR SHOPPING CENTER, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, FULTON FINANCIAL
CORPORATION, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, FULTON BANK, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, MR.
R. SCOTT SMITH, CEO, FULTON FINANICAL CORPORATION, PHILLIP WENGER, COO, FULTON
FINANICAL CORPORATION, MR. CRAIG RODA, CEO FULTON BANK, MS DANA CHRYST, BOARD OF
DIRECTORS, FULTON FINANICAL CORPORATION, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, NEW
HOLLAND DENTAL CLINIC, NEW HOLLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, DR. WEST, NEW HOLLAND DENTAL
CLINIC, LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS, INC., LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, STEVE WEAVER,
MANAGER, LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS, JOHN BUCKWALTER, BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
CHAIRMAN, LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS, HIGH INDUSTRIES, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA,
FRANK MCCABE, HIGH HOTELS, S. DALE HIGH, HIGH INDUSTRIES, BARLEY SNYDER, LLC.,
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, SHAWN LONG, ESQ., BARLEY SNYDER, LLC, WGAL TV-8,
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, PAUL QUINN, GENERAL MANAGER, WGAL TV-8, DOUG ALLEN,
WGAL TV-8, JANELLE STELLSON, WGAL TV-8, SUSAN SHIPIRO, WGAL TV-8, BARBARA BARR,
WGAL TV-8, LANCASTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, LANCASTER COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA, COPY MAX/IMPRESSO OFFICE MAX, RED ROSE COMMONS, LANCASTER,
PENNSYLVANIA, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF
COMMON PLEAS, RYAN P. AUMENT, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, LANCASTER
GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 1 OF
JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 2
OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, DR.
VITO DICAMILLO OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT,
WACHOVIA BANK, HERSHEY AVENUE AND MANOR STREETS, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA,
BRANCH MANAGER, WACHOVIA BANK, HERSHEY AVENUE AND MANOR STREETS, LANCASTER,
PENNSYLVANIA, ANNIE BAILEYS RESTUARANT AND BAR, MARION COURTROOM RESTUARANT
AND BAR, MARION STREET CAFE, MIKE GEESEY, PROPRIETOR, MARION COURTROOM, ALLEY
KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT, JOHN KATRAS, PROPRIETOR, ALLEY KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT,
BRETT STABLEY, MANAGER, ALLEY KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT, ROSA ROSA RESTUARANT,
THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB, GEORGE SOUKAS, MANAGER, THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB, RUBY
TUESDAY, RESTUARANT BAR AND GRILL, MANOR SHOPPING CENTER, VALENTINOS CAFE,
LANCASTER BRICKYARD BAR, LANCASTER COUNTY RESTUARANT ASSOCIATION, DAVID
PFLUMM, PENNSYLVANIA CAREER LINK, LIBERTY PLACE, LANCASTER, LANCASTER
EMPLOYMENT TRAINING AGENCY (LETA), MARK SPRUNGER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, LETA, RED
ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (RRTA), DAVID KILMER, RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY,
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, KIETH SADDLER, CHIEF OF POLICE, LANCASTER CITY
POLICE BUREAU, SGT. RICHARD COSMORE, LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, LANCASTER
CITY HOUSING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT, MR. MCGUIRE, LANCASTER CITY HOUSING
INSPECTION DEPARTMENT AND NON-UNIFORMED UNION, REPRESENTATIVE LANCASTER CITY
POLICE UNION, LANCASTER CITY POLICE UNION, RICHARD GRAY, MAYOR , CITY OF
LANCASTER, LANCASTER COUNTYWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, WILLIAM RICHARD PLANK,
RESIDENTS OF 1200 BLOCK FREMONT STREET, LANCASTER, PA , LANCASTER COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, CRAIG STEDMAN, LANCASTER DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MICHAEL
LANDIS, DETECTIVE, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY. OFFICE, PRESIDENT JUDGE, LOUIS
FARINA, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUDGE JAMES P. CULLEN,
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY
GENERAL OFFICE, THOMAS CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL / UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY OFFICE FO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSLVANIA IN PHILADELPHIA, ERIC
HOLDER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION (FBI),
HARRISBURG OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION (FBI), PHILADELPHIA OFFICE,
SHERYL CROW, INTERSCOPE RECORDING ARTIST, UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY
AGENCY (NSA(, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (D.O.D.), DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, (DIA), ROBERT GATES, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF
DEFENSE, BARRACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES PRESIDENT

DOCKDETSPage
Page 361
288 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
06/15/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED

J. CATERBONE,
PRO
SE.
REINSTATED
AS Se Billing File
StanBY
J. STAN
Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
Group, Pro
REQUESTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY AND ADD THE FOLLOWING PARTIES TO
THE CAPTIONED: ANNIE BAILEYS RESTUARANT AND BAR, MARION COURTROOM RESTUARANT
DEFENSE, BARRACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES PRESIDENT
06/17/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. REINSTATED AS

REQUESTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
06/18/2009
AMENDED CAPTION ENTRY IS: ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP / STAN J. CATERBONE VS. DUKE
COMMON PLEAS, RYAN P. AUMENT, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS

DOCKDETSPage
Page 362
289 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
06/18/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT. REINSTATED

AS DIRECTED
BY RANDALL
O. WENGER,
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
PROTHONOTARY. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE AND ADD THE FOLLOWING NAMES
TO THE CAPTIONED COMPLAINT: LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, COLLEGE
COMMON PLEAS, RYAN P. AUMENT, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
06/24/2009
06/26/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-15. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
06/29/2009
07/01/2009
07/02/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-18 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
07/07/2009
07/13/2009
07/14/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-21 FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE.
07/14/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE. REINSTATED AS

DIRECTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY AND TO ADD THE FOLLOWNG PARTIES TO
THE COMPLAINT. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 1 OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOPITAL
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 2 OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, DR. VITO DICAMILLO OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, WACHOVIA BANK, HERSHEY AVENUE AND MANOR
STREETS, LANCSTER, PENNSYLVANIA / BRANCH MANAGER, WACHOVIA BANK, HERSHEY
AVENUE AND MANOR STREETS LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA

DOCKDETSPage
Page 363
290 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
07/14/2009

MEDIA
GROUP / STAN
CATERBONE
VS. Group,
Stan
J. Caterbone
and J.
Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
DEFENSE, BARRACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES PRESIDENT, DR. AMINTA HAWKINS-BREAN, PH.D.,
VICE PRESIDENT STUDENT AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, JODIE RICHARDSON,
SECRETARY OF STUDENT AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, LORI B. AUSTIN, DIRECTOR OF
JUDICIAL AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, VICTOR DESANTIS, DIRECTOR, GRADUATE
STUDIES AND RESEACH PROGRAM, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, MARJORIE M. WARMKESSLER,
PH.D. HUMANTIES LIBRARIAN AND LIBRARIAN INSTRUCTION COORDINATOR, MILLERSVILLE
UNIVERSITY, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY,
NATHANIEL BOMBERGER, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT, P. MICHAEL STURLA, PENNSYLVANIA

DOCKDETSPage
Page 364
291 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, JOHN ROCHAT,

OF POLICE,
MILLERSVILLE
BOROUGH
Stan J.CHIEF
Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
07/16/2009
07/17/2009
07/23/2009
07/28/2009
07/29/2009
08/03/2009
08/03/2009
08/05/2009
08/07/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT AND TO ADD THE FOLLOWING NAMED PARTIES TO
THE COMPLAINT:STEVE MIDCIFF, CEO, LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR.
ANTHONY MASTROPIETRO, MEDICAL DIRECTOR, LANCASTER REGIN HOSPITAL, LANCASTER,
PA.; LINDA S. WENGER, PA-C, LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; CHRISTINE M.
DANG, M.D., LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; MASTROPIETRO ASSOCIATES
FAMILY PRACTICE, NOLL DRIVE, LANCASTER, PA.; BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.;
DR. JOHN BLACK III, BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; SOUTHEAST HEALTH CLINIC,
BRIGHTSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. LEO DORIZYNSKI, PSYCHIATRY
DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. SEAN COLDREN, M.D.,
PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. EMILY
PRESSLEY, M.D., PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER,
PA..; DR. DANIEL McINTYRE, M.D., LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.;
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. TATE,
LANCASTER EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES OF LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..;
AMY MILLHOUSE, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; OFFICER ERIC McCRADY,
LANCASTER CITY BURAEU OF POLICE, LANCASTER, PA.; LANCASTER COUNTY MENTAL
HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER, PA.;
JAMES McLAUGHLIN, DISRECTOR, MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DEPARTMENT,
COUNTY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER, PA.; CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY;
MR. McCARDY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY' BOARD
OF COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; DENNIS STUCKEY, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; HOUSE OF PASTA, BAR & RESTAURANT,
MILLERSVILLE PIKE, LANCASTER, PA.; YORGEY'S RESTAURANT & BAR, NORTH QUEEN ST.,
LANCASTER, PA.; UPS COPY STORE, STONE MILL PLAZA, LANCASTER, PA.; ART WARD,
PROPERIETOR, UPS COPY STORE, STONE MILL PLAZA, LANCASTER, PA.; PENNSYLVANIA STATE
POLICE TROOP J. LINCOLN HIGHWAY EAST, LANCASTER, PA.; COMMANDER, PA. STATE POLICE
TROOP J, LINCOLN HIGHWAY EAST, LANCASTER, PA.; PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION(PENNDOT); BEVERLY POINTS, ESQ., LEGAL COUNSEL, PENNSYLVANIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS,
COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; TERRY BERGMAN, SHERIFF OF LANCASTER COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; MARK REESE, CHIEF DEPUTY,
LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA. FILED BY:
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
REINSTATED AS DIRECTED. RANDALL O. WENGER,
PROTHONOTARY.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 365
292 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
08/07/2009

MEDIA
GROUP / STAN
CATERBONE
VS. Group,
Stan
J. Caterbone
and J.
Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 366
293 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

OF POLICE,
MILLERSVILLE
BOROUGH
Stan J.CHIEF
Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVE MIDCIFF, CEO,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. ANTHONY MASTROPIETRO, MEDICAL
DIRECTOR, LANCASTER REGIN HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; LINDA S. WENGER, PA-C,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; CHRISTINE M. DANG, M.D., LANCASTER
REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; MASTROPIETRO ASSOCIATES FAMILY PRACTICE, NOLL
DRIVE, LANCASTER, PA.; BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; DR. JOHN BLACK III,
BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; SOUTHEAST HEALTH CLINIC, BRIGHTSIDE
BAPTIST CHURCH, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. LEO DORIZYNSKI, PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT,
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. SEAN COLDREN, M.D., PSYCHIATRY
DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. EMILY PRESSLEY, M.D.,
PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..; DR. DANIEL
McINTYRE, M.D., LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. TATE, LANCASTER
EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES OF LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..; AMY
MILLHOUSE, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; OFFICER ERIC McCRADY,
LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.
08/11/2009
08/14/2009
08/20/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-32 FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, PLAINTIFF
08/31/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT AND TO KINDLY ADD THE FOLLOWING NAMED
PARTIES: LENS CRAFTERS; DR. JOHN H. BROADDUS & ASSOCIATES; CARTRIDGE WORLD;
KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORE; EYEMART EXPRESS STORE; DR. HARRY BREITMAN; OFFICE MAX
STORE; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CIA; LEON PANETTA, DIRECTOR CIA FILED BY STAN
J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE. REINSTATED AS DIRECTED. RANDALL O. WENGER, ESQ.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 367
294 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
08/31/2009

MEDIA
GROUP / STAN
CATERBONE
VS. Group,
Stan
J. Caterbone
and J.
Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 368
295 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

OF POLICE,
MILLERSVILLE
BOROUGH
Stan J.CHIEF
Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVE MIDCIFF, CEO,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. ANTHONY MASTROPIETRO, MEDICAL
DIRECTOR, LANCASTER REGIN HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; LINDA S. WENGER, PA-C,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; CHRISTINE M. DANG, M.D., LANCASTER
REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; MASTROPIETRO ASSOCIATES FAMILY PRACTICE, NOLL
DRIVE, LANCASTER, PA.; BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; DR. JOHN BLACK III,
BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; SOUTHEAST HEALTH CLINIC, BRIGHTSIDE
BAPTIST CHURCH, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. LEO DORIZYNSKI, PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT,
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. SEAN COLDREN, M.D., PSYCHIATRY
DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. EMILY PRESSLEY, M.D.,
PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..; DR. DANIEL
McINTYRE, M.D., LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. TATE, LANCASTER
EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES OF LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..; AMY
MILLHOUSE, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; OFFICER ERIC McCRADY,
LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.,LENS
CRAFTERS, LANCASTER, PA., DR. JOHN H. BROADDUS & ASSOCIATES, OPTOMETRISTS,
LANCASTER, PA., CARTRIDGE WORLD, LANCASTER, PA., KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORE,
LANCASTER, PA., EYEMART EXPRESS STORE, LANCASTER, PA., DR. HARRY BREITMAN,
LANCASTER, PA., OFFICE MAX STORE #854, LANCASTER, PA., CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY, CIA, LANGLEY, VIRGINIA, LEON PANETTA, DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY, LANGLEY, VIRGINIA
09/03/2009
09/16/2009
09/16/2009
09/29/2009
09/29/2009

10/02/2009
10/06/2009
10/13/2009
10/16/2009
10/19/2009
10/21/2009
10/23/2009
10/28/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT. FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
10/30/2009
11/10/2009
11/20/2009

DOCKDETSPage
Page 369
296 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
11/20/2009
Stan
J. J.
Caterbone
andPRO
Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-48 FILED BY
STAN
CATERBONE,
SE.
11/20/2009
11/25/2009
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE. REINSTATED AS

DIRECTED BY RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
12/09/2009
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-49 WITH CD-ROM AS EXHIBIT FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO
SE.
12/18/2009

12/18/2009
12/29/2009
12/29/2009
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (EMERGENCY) FOR RELIEF. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE,

PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
12/29/2009
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009, UPON
CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR
RELIEF, THE REQUEST IS DENIED. PA. R.C.P. 1531(A) PROVIDES, THAT A COURT MAY ISSUE AN
EX PARTE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ONLY AFTER WRITTEN NOTICE AND HEARING UNLESS IT
APPEARS TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT THAT IMMEDIATE AND IRREPARABLE INJURY
WILL BE SUSTAINED BEFORE NOTICE CAN BE GIVEN OR A HEARING HELD, IN WHICH CASE THE
COURT MAY ISSUE (THE) INJUNCTION WITHOUT A HEARING OR WITHOUT NOTICE. IN
DETERMINING WHETHER (THE) INJUNCTION SHOULD BE GRANTED AND WHETHER NOTICE OR
A HEARING SHOULD BE REQUIRED, THE COURT MAY ACT ON THE BASIS OF THE AVEMENTS OF
THE PLEADINGS OR PETITION AND MAY CONSIDER AFFIDAVITS OF PARTIES OR THIRD
PERSONS OR ANY OTHER PROOF WHICH THE COURT MAY REQUIRE. HERE, THE IRREPARABLE
HARM ALLEGED IS LOSS BY PLAINTIFF OF (1) PERSONAL PROPERTY AND REAL ESTATE; (2)
OPPORTUNITY TO SECURE PERSONAL PROPERTY, BUSINESS ASSETS, AND COURT RELATED
ASSETS, INFORMATION, AND EVIDENCE; (3) PROTECTION FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT AT EVERY
LEVEL [:] LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL; (4) RELATIONSHIPS INCLUDING FAMILY [,] FRIENDS [,]
AND PROFESSIONAL; (5) TIME AND LIFE AS A NORMAL PERSON WOULD KNOW IT; (6) TIME WITH
MOTHER, WHO IS IN HER LAST STAGE OF LIFE. . .; (7) FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT [:]
COMPLAINANT HAS BEEN DENIED EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO SECURE HIS PERSONAL AND
BUSINESS ASSETS AT 1250 FREMONT STREET, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA [,] MAKING IT
IMPOSSIBLE TO TRAVEL OR LEAVE FOR ANY AMOUNT OF TIME. . .; (8) FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT
MAY CONSTITUTE FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND MAY INVOKE THE FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS
LAWS OF FREEDOM [SIC]; (9) FEMALE COMPANIONSHIP; (10) BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES; AND
(11) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES. THE SOURCES OF THE ALLEGED IRREPARABLE HARM ARE
APPROXIMATELY 82 DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, ELECTED OFFICIALS,
PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS, BUSINESS OF VARIOUS TYPES, MEDICAL PRACTICES AND
PRACTITIONERS, LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS AND NUMEROUS PRINCIPLES, EMPLOYEES
AND AGENTS OF THE NAMED ENTITIES, WHICH ARE NAMED IN A PRIVATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
MADE PART OF PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. IN HIS REQUEST
FOR RELIEF,: THE COMPLAINANT SEEKS IMMEDIATE RELIEF FROM THE ABOVE IN THE FORM OF
SANCTIONS AND FINES FOR THOSE GUILTY OF EXTORTATION AND EMBEZZLEMENT AND
THOSE WITHHOLDING ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES. COMPLAINANT SEEKS IMMEDIATE RELIEF
FROM THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT CONTINUE ABUSE OF PROCESS.
COMPLAINANT SEEKS IMMEDIATE RELIEF FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS FOUND GUILTY OF
OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE AND DUE PROCESS. COMPLAINANT SEEKS RELIEF, IN AS MUCH AS THE
COURTS ARE ABLE, WITH REGARDS TO THE HARASSMENT AND TORTURE FROM THOSE
FOUND GUILTY OF SUCH CRIMES. GIVEN THE STRICT STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE ENTRY
OF EX PARTE RELIEF, THIS COURT CANNOT SAY THAT THE ALLEGATIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S
PRIVATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT PROVIDE A CREDIBLE FACTUAL BASIS ON WHICH TO GRANT
RELIEF. WHILE PLAINTIFF MAY BELIEVE THE FACTUAL AVEMENTS AND LEGAL
TRANSGRESSIONS TO BE PROVEN, THERE IS NO EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT PROVIDED TO THE
COURT. MOREOVER, IN MANY INSTANCES, THE HARM CITED AND RELIEF REQUESTED ARE NOT
RATIONALLY RELATED TO THE PERSONS/ENTITIES IDENTIFIED, OR THEIR ALLEGED ACTS OR
OMISSIONS. WITHOUT NOTICE TO THE PERSON OR ENTITY SOUGHT TO BE ENJOINED, A
CLEARER STATEMENT OF THE SPECIFIC HARM AND NEXUS BETWEEN THE ACTOR'S BEHAVIOR,
AND AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AT WHICH ALL PARTIES MAY PRESENT PROOFS, INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF WILL NOT LIE. BY THE COURT: MARGARET C. MILLER, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236 NOTICE
TO: STAN J. CATERBONE (1). MAILED ON 12/30/09.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 370
297 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
01/04/2010
MOTION PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

FOR RELIEF
MOTION
FOR Media
Stan J. Caterbone
and
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone,
RECONSIDERATIOIN FOR EX PARTE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF OF ORDER DATED DECEMBER 29, 2009
FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. (FORWARDED TO JUDGE MILLER ON JAN. 4, 2010)
01/06/2010
01/07/2010
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J CATERBONE. REINSTATED AS

DIRECTED BY RANDALL O. WENGER, PROTHONOTARY.
01/11/2010
01/19/2010
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2010, UPON CONSIDERATION
OF PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR RELIEF MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR EX PARTE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF OF ORDER DATED DECEMBER 29,
2009, THE REQUEST IS DENIED. BY THE COURT: MARGARET C. MILLER, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236
NOTICE TO: STAN J. CATERBONE/ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP (1). MAILED ON 1/21/10.
01/19/2010
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
01/22/2010
02/05/2010
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-55 PLUS C-D ROM FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
02/16/2010
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE.
02/18/2010
02/19/2010
02/22/2010
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-58 FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE
03/04/2010
03/09/2010
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT A-61 FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
03/09/2010
03/10/2010
03/10/2010
03/17/2010
PRAECIPE TO FILE PRAECIPE EXHIBIT A-64 FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE,
DEFENDANT.
03/18/2010
03/19/2010
03/31/2010
04/01/2010
04/20/2010
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATTERBONE.
04/27/2010
05/03/2010
05/11/2010
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, ProSe.
08/31/2015
PRAECIPE, FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE
09/01/2015
PRAECIPE REINSTATE COMPLAINT, FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, FILED BY STAN J.

CATERBONE
09/02/2015
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT TITLED "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT", FILED BY STAN J.
CATERBONE
09/10/2015
PRAECIPE, FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE
09/10/2015
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE COMPLAINT FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE. REINSTATED AS

DIRECTED BY KATHERINE WOOD JACOBS, PROTHONOTARY.
09/22/2015
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT, FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE
09/30/2015
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE: KINDLY REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT ORIGINALLY FILED ON

DECEMBER 3, 2008 IN THE ABOVE CAPTIONED ACTION ALONG WITH THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A.
FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 371
298 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
10/02/2015
Stan J.
Caterbone
andORIGINALLY
Advanced
StanFILED
Media
J. Caterbone,
PRAECIPE TO REINSTATE: KINDLY REINSTATE
THE
COMPLAINT
ON
DECEMBER 3, 2008 IN THE ABOVE CAPTIONED ACTION ALONG WITH THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT.
FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
02/03/2016
PETITION - IFP- GENERAL: TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FEES

WITH AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
SENT TO JUDGE REINAKER ON 2/5/2016.
02/10/2016
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED.

AND NOW, THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016, UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED
PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS, IT IS HEREBY DENIED.
BY THE COURT: DENNIS E. REINAKER, PRESIDENT JUDGE
COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ESQ., ON 2/10/16.
02/10/2016
IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED.
05/12/2016
Praecipe to file exhibit-Corroborating Expert And Former Nsa Whistleblower Karen Stewart's Disclosure
Of Electrogagnetic Weapons Used To Kill May 12 - Copy filed by Stan Caterbone
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 372
299 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor

vs.
HOTEL BRUNSWICK (et al.)
Case Number
CI-15-10167

11/20/2015
COMPLAINT: FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.

FILED ELECTRONICALLY.
11/20/2015
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP VS HOTEL
BRUNSWICK AND ROGER FITZWATER, JR., WOODCREST AUDIO AND THE JAMES STREET
INVESTMENT DISTRICT AND THE LANCASTER FILM COMMISSION AND THE LANCASTER FILM
COMMISSION HONORARY BOARD MEMBERS AND SENATOR GIBSON ARMSTRONG AND
CHARLES SMITHGALL AND GLENN ROBINSON AND LARRY ALEXANDER AND MICHAEL O'DAY AND
BRAD HEPFER AND TIMOTHY MARSDEN.
11/24/2015
CI-15-10167 Lancaster County Court MOTION for Leave to File In Forma Pauperis Caterbone v
Brunswick-Fitzwater-Lancaster Film November 24, 2015
11/24/2015
MOTION TO WITHDRAW: FILED BY PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
11/30/2015
ORDER: AND NOW, THIS 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015, UPON CONSIDERATION OF
PLAINTIFF'S PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT, WHICH
WAS ELECTRONICALLY FILED WITH THE COURT ON NOVEMBER 24, 2015:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS DENIED. THE FINANCIAL RECORDS
SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF AS PART OF HIS PETITION INDICATE THAT PLAINTIFF HAS
SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL MEANS AND IS NOT INDIGENT. NOTABLY, PLAINTIFF STATES HE HAS
$23,000 IN A SAVINGS ACCOUNT AND REAL ESTATE ASSETS IN ADDITION TO MONTHLY INCOME
OF $1,333.00. FURTHERMORE, PLAINTIFF PAID THE REQUIRED FILING FEE FOR THE INSTANT
ACTION WHICH INDICATES TO THIS COURT THAT HE IS FINANCIALLY ABLE TO PROCEED
WITHOUT THE REQUESTED RELIEF.
BY THE COURT JEFFREY D WRIGHT, JUDGE.
COPY (1) SENT TO PLAINTIFF ON 11/30/2015.
02/03/2016

WITH AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
SENT TO JUDGE REINAKER ON 2/5/2016.
02/10/2016

AND NOW, THIS DAY 9TH OF FEBRUARY, 2016, UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED
PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS, IT IS HEREBY DENIED.
BY THE COURT: DENNIS E. REINAKER, PRESIDENT JUDGE
COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ESQ. ON 2/10/16.
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 373
300 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number
CI-15-06985

08/17/2015
PETITION: FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.

COPY (2) HANDED BACK TO PLAINTIFF OVER THE COUNTER ON 8/17/2015.
08/17/2015
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP VS RESIDENTS OF
THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA.
08/17/2015

WITH AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS. FILED BY STANLEY J CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
SENT TO BUSINESS JUDGE WRIGHT ON 8/17/2015.
08/20/2015
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT A, FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE
08/20/2015

AND NOW, THIS 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015, UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S PETITION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND THE ACTION FILED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH: IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT CI-15-06985 IS DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS IN THAT IT LACKS ANY
ARGUABLE BASIS EITHER IN LAW OR IN FACT.
BY THE COURT: JEFFERY D. WRIGHT, JUDGE
COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE ON 8/20/15.
08/24/2015
APPEAL FOR RECONSIDERATION. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.

SENT TO JUDGE WRIGHT ON 8/24/2015.
08/24/2015
MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT B. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
MOTION AND EXHIBIT SENT TO JUDGE WRIGHT ON 8/24/2015.

09/01/2015

AND NOW, THIS 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015, UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S PRO SE
"APPEAL FOR RECONSIDERATION", FILED WITH THE COURT ON AUGUST 24, 2015: SAID
PETITION IS DENIED.
BY THE COURT: JEFFERY D. WRIGHT, JUDGE
COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE ON 9/2/15.
09/02/2015
PRAECIPE TO FILE EXHIBIT TITLED "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT", FILED BY STANLEY J.
CATERBONE
09/08/2015
APPEAL TO HIGHER COURT - NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OF

ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 WITH PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS &
AFFIDAVIT. FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
(SENT TO JUDGE WRIGHT 9-8-15)
FILING FEES OF $75.00 FOR LANCASTER COUNTY PROTHONOTARY AND $85.50 FOR SUPERIOR
COURT PAID ON 9-14-15.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 374
301 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
09/10/2015
ORDER FILED. AND NOW, THIS 9TH DAYStan

OF SEPTEMBER,
2015,
CONSIDERATION
OF Pro Se Billing File
J. Caterbone
andUPON
Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group,
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ("MOTION") AND NOTICE OF APPEAL TO
SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OF ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 UNDER
PENNSYLVNIA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 552: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS DENIED. THE FINANCIAL RECORDS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF AS PART
OF HIS MOTION INDICATE THAT PLAINTIFF HAS SUBSTANTIAL FINANCIAL MEANS AND IS NOT
INDIGENT. NOTABLY, PLAINTIFF HAS OVER $50,000 IN A SAVINGS ACCOUNT AND $20,000 IN
REAL ESTATE ASSETS IN ADDITION TO MONTLY INCOME OF $1,333.00 FOR THE PAST TWELVE
MONTHS. BY THE COURT: JEFFERY D. WRIGHT, JUDGE. COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED ON
9-10-15 TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
11/04/2015
RECORD SENT TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
11/20/2015
OPINION FILED. BY THE COURT: JEFFERY D. WRIGHT, JUDGE. COPY WITH 236 NOTICE
MAILED ON 11-23-15 TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
11/23/2015
SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD SENT TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA - NO. 1561 MDA
2015. COPY OF RECORD SENT TO STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE.
06/15/2016
LETTER FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA - 353 MT 2016, FILED.
08/02/2016
LETTER FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA - NO. 495 MAL 2016, SUPERIOR COURT
NO. 1561 MDA 2015, FILED.
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 375
302 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STAN J CATERBONE (et al.)

vs.
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE (et al.)
Case Number
CI-16-05815

06/27/2016
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR IMMEDIATE RELIEF FILED BY STANLEY
CATERBONE, PRO SE

DOCKDETSPage
Page 376
303 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
06/27/2016
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STAN J CATERBONE/ADVANCED

MEDIA GROUP
VS LANCASTER
CITY
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
BUREAU OF POLICE, DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER, LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY
SYSTEM, LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY, DIANE PAWLING, DR. AMINTA HAWKINS-BREAU PHD,
VICE PRESINDENT STUDENT AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, LORI B AUSTIN, DIRECTOR
OF JUDICIAL AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, VICTOR DESANTIS, DIRECTOR, GRADUATE
STUDIES AND RESEARCH PROGRAM, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, MARJORIE M WARMKESSLER
PHD, HUMANITIES LIBRARIAN AND LIBRARIAN INSTRUCTION COORDINATOR, MILLERSVILLE
PETE ANDERS, CHIEF, JOHN ROCHAT, CHIEF OF POLICE, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH OF POLICE
DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER, DR. L. WENGER, LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, WEIS MARKETS,
WEIS PHARMACY, AMY BRENT, PHARMACIST, DISTRICT MANAGER, WEIS MARKET, CVS
PHARMACY, FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION, FULTON BANK, MR. R. SCOTT SMITH, CEO,
FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, NEW HOLLAND DENTAL
CLINIC, DR. WEST, LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS INC, STEVE WEAVER, MANAGER, LANCASTER
NEWSPAPERS, ROBERT KRASNE, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, CHAIRMAN, LANCASTER
NEWSPAPERS, HIGH INDUSTRIES, FRANK MCCABE, HIGH HOTELS, S. DALE HIGH, HIGH
INDUSTRIES, BARLEY SNYDER LLC, SHAWN LONG ESQ, BARLEY SNYDER LLC, WGAL TV-8, PAUL
QUINN, GENERAL MANAGER, WGAL TV-8, LANCASTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,
COPY MAX-IMPRESSO OFFICE MAX, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENT, JANE DOE PSYCH NURSE DURING 302 COMITMENTS APRIL 2010, JULY 2015,
FEBRUARY 2016, NURSE 1 OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 2 OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, DR. VITO DICAMILLO OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, WACHOVIA BANK/WELLS FARGO, BRANCH MANAGER,
WACHOVIA BANK, ANNIE BAILEYS RESTAURANT AND BAR, ALTANA ROOFTOP BAR, MARRIOTT
BAR, TELLUS360, CIGAR BAR, PRESSROOM BAR, LANCASTER DISPENSING COMPANY,
YORGEYS, 551 WEST, THE BELVEDERE INN, PENN SQUARE GRILLE AND RENDEZVOUS
LOUNGE, TOBIAS FROG, THE BRASSERIE, CEDRIC BARBERET, ESTELLE BARBERET, BEN
FRANK OF AMALFI PROPERTIES, BISTRO BARBERET AND BAKERY, MARION COURTROOM
RESTAURANT AND BAR, MARION STREET CAFE, MIKE GEESEY, PROPRIETOR, MARION
COURTROOM, ROSA ROSA RESTAURANT, THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB, GEORGE SOUKAS,
MANAGER, THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB, RUBY TUESDAY, RESTAURANT AND BAR, VALENTINOS
CAFE, LANCASTER BRICKYARD BAR, LANCASTER COUNTY RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION,
PENNSYLVANIA CAREER LINK, LANCASTER EMPLOYMENT TRAINING AGENCY (LETA), MARK
APRUNGER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, LETA, REDROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (RRTA), DAVID
KILMER, RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY, LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, KIETH SADDLER,
CHIEF OF POLICE, LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, SGT RICHARD COSMORE, LANCASTER
CITY POLICE BUREAU, DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER, OFFICER BINDERUP, OFFICER
WILLIAMS, CAPTAIN MCCORD, LANCASTER CITY HOUSING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT, MR.
MCGUIRE, LANCASTER CITY HOUSING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT AND NON-UNIFORMED
UNION, REPRESENTATIVE LANCASTER CITY POLICE UNION, LANCASTER CITY POLICE UNION,
RICHARD GRAY, MAYOR, LANCASTER COUNTYWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, RESIDENTS OF 1200
BLOCK OF FREMONT STREET, LANCASTER, PA, LANCASER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
OFFICE, CRAIG STEDMAN, LANCASTER DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CURRENT CHEIF OF DETECTIVES,
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY OFFICE, PRESIDENT JUDGE, DENNIS REINAKER,
GENERAL OFFICE OTHER THAN KATHLEEN KANE, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN PHILADELPHIA,
LORETTA LYNCH, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUEA OF INVESTIGATION
(FBI) HARRISBURG OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION (FBI), PHILADELPHIA OFFICE,
UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA), UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE (DOD), DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (DIA), ROBERT GATES,
UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, BARRACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES PRESIDENT,
COPY MAX/IMPRESSO OFFICE MAX, COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT
OF COMMON PLEAS, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, STEVE MIDCIFF, CEO,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, DR. ANTHONY MASTROPIETRO, MEDICAL DIRECTOR,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LINDA S WENGER, PA-C, LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL,
CHRISTINE M DANG MD, LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, PATIENT FIRST URGENT CARE,
MEDEXPRESS, RENTAL ZONE LANCASTER FRANCHISE, CAPITOL COTY OF FULTON BANK
BUILDING, NATIONAL DECURITY AGENCY OR NSA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE LIQUOR
CONTROL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, MASTROPIETRO ASSOCIATES FAMILY PRACTICE, BLACK
AND BLACK DENTAL, DR. JOHN BLACK III, BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, SOUTHEAST HEALTH
CLINIC, BRIGHTSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH, DR. LEO DORIZYNSKI, PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 377
304 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, DR. SEAN

MD, PSYCHIATRY
DEPARTMENT,
StanCOLDREN
J. Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, DR. EMILY PRESSLEY MD, PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT,
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, DR. DANIEL MCINTYRE MD, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL,
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY, DR. TATE, LANCASTER
EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES OF LANCASTER GENERAL, AMY MILLHOUSE, LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL, OFFICER ERIC MCCRADY, LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, LANCASTER
COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LANCASTER,
JAMES MCLAUGHLIN, DISECTOR, MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DEPARTMENT,
COUNTY OF LANCASTER, CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY, MR. MCCARDY,
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY, BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, DENNIS STUCKEY, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, HOUSE OF PASTA BAR & RESTAURANT, YRGEYS
RESTAURANT & BAR, UPS COPY STORE, ART WARD, PROPRIETOR, UPS COPY STORE,
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE TROOP J, COMMANDER, PA STATE POLICE TROOP J,
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (PENNDOT), BEVERLY POINTS ESQ, LEGAL
COUNSEL, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, LANCASTER COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA, LENS
CRAFTERS, DR. JOHN H BROADDUS & ASSOCIATES, CARTRIDGE WORLD, KOHLS DEPARTMENT
STORE, EYEMART EXPRESS STORE, DR. HARRY BREITMAN, OFFICE MAX STORE #854,
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CIA, JOHN BRENNEN, DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY, JAMES STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES, MDJ
ADAM WITKONIS, MDJ DAVID MILLER, MDJ SCOTT ALBERT, BRUCE ROTH, MDJ PIANKA,
DAUPHIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MDJ JANICE JAMINEZ, OFFICER THOMAS
GJURICH, OFFICER RICHARD CAPLE, OFFICER CHRISTOPHER KEEN, MANOR TOWNSHIP
POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER BRADLEY BUD HARRIS, CAPITOL POLICE, EDWARD MARSISCO
JR, DAUPHIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, US DISTRICT JUDGE PAUL DIAMOND, US
BANKRUPSY JUDGE FEITZING
06/27/2016
PETITION - IFP- GENERAL TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FEES

FILED BY STAN J CATERBONE, PRO SE
06/28/2016
CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ASHWORTH

CONFLICT - REASSIGN
06/28/2016
CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE CULLEN

7-7-16 JUDGE CULLEN RECUSED HIMSELF - REASSIGN.
07/05/2016
MOTION TO RECUSE THE HONORABLE JUDGE JAMES P CULLEN FILED BY STAN J CATERBONE,
PRO SE. BRIEF, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, EXHIBITS ATTACHED. SENT TO JUDGE CULLEN
7/6/16
07/07/2016
CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE BROWN.
07/08/2016
ORDER - IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED. AND NOW, THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2016, UPON
PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED INFORMATION REGARDING THE
REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF TO FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS, SAID REQUEST IS HEREBY DENIED, THE
CLERK OF THE COURT IS DIRECTED TO STRIKE THE APPEAL IF COSTS ARE NOT PAID WITHIN 20
DAYS.
BY THE COURT:
JUDGE BROWN
CC: STAN J CATERBONE (1)
236 NOTICE SENT 7/11/16
07/08/2016

AND NOW, THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY 2016, UPON REVIEW OF THE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION FILED JULY 5, 2016, BY PLAINTIFF, STAN J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS
HEREBY DENIED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE.
BY THE COURT: LEONARD G. BROWN, III, JUDGE
COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED TO STAN J. CATERBONE AND LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF
POLICE ON 7/11/16.
07/11/2016
RULE 236 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF - THE FILING FEE OF $1,088.25 IS REQUIRED TO BE PAID
WITHIN 10 DAYS. IF NOT PAID THE PROTHONOTARY SHALL ENTER A JUDGMENT OF NON PROS.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 378
305 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
07/12/2016
EXHIBIT TITLED "ALLSTATE SWORN TESTIMONY

STAN J. CATERBONE
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME
Stan J. OF
Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
2 AND VOLUME 1 JULY 12, 2016", FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE
07/12/2016
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF IFP ORDER DATED JULY 8, 2016 FILED BY STANLEY
CATERBONE, PRO SE. EXHIBIT ATTACHED. SENT TO JUDGE BROWN 7/12/16.
07/13/2016
EXHIBIT TO PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF, FILED BY STAN

J. CATERBONE
07/13/2016
EXHIBIT TO PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF, FILED BY STAN

J. CATERBONE
07/25/2016
APPEAL TO HIGHER COURT - NOTICE OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

MOTION FOR APPEAL TO THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT. FILED BY STAN J.
CATERBONE, PRO SE LITIGANT.
07/25/2016
PETITION - IFP- GENERAL - PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS & AFFIDAVIT. FILED
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. (SENT TO JUDGE BROWN 7-22-16)
07/25/2016
ORDER FILED. AND NOW ON THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2016 UPON PRESENTATION AND
INFORMATION OF THE ATTACHED INFORMATION REGARDING THE REQUEST OF THE PLAINTIFF
TO FILE IN FORMA PAUPERS, SUCH REQUEST IS; DENIED. BY THE COURT: LEONARD G.
BROWN, III, JUDGE. COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED ON 7-25-16 STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
07/26/2016
ORDER FILED. AND NOW, THIS 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2016, THE PETITIONER'S MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED AS TO THE FILING FEES AND COSTS. BY THE
COURT: LEONARD G. BROWN, III, JUDGE. COPY WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED ON 7-27-16 TO STAN
J. CATERBONE.
07/27/2016
RULE 236 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF - THE FILING FEE OF $75.00 TO LANCASTER COUNTY
PROTHONOTARY AND $85.50 PAYABLE TO SUPERIOR COURT IS REQUIRED TO BE PAID WITHIN
10 DAYS. IF NOT PAID THE PROTHONOTARY SHALL ENTER A JUDGMENT OF NON PROS.
08/19/2016
EXHIBIT, FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE
10/27/2016
ORDER AND NOW, THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016, PLAINTIFF, STAN J. CATERBONE, HAVING
FILED A NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT THE PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE OF RECORD AND CONCURRENTLY SERVE ON THE
COURT A CONCISE STATEMENT OF THE MATTERS COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL NO LATER THAN
NOVEMBER 16, 2016. ANY ISSUE NOT PROPERLY INCLUDED IN THE STATEMENT TIMELY FILED
AND SERVED SHALL BE DEEMED WAIVED.
BY THE COURT: LEONARD G. BROWN, III, JUDGE
CC: STAN J. CATERBONE (1)
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE (1)
236 NOTICE SENT 10/27/2016
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 379
306 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL (et al.)
Case Number
CI-16-08472

09/22/2016
COMPLAINT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, IN PRO SE
09/22/2016
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STANLEY J. CATERBONE VS. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL; ABBEYVILLE
FAMILY MEDICINE; PATIENT FIRST URGENT CARE; SOUTHEAST MEDICAL; MEDEXPRESS
URGENT CARE; LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AND THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT
10/03/2016
MOTION FOR A 30-DAY CONTINUANCE, FILED
10/03/2016
EXHIBIT FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE IN PRO SE
10/31/2016
CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ASHWORTH
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 380
307 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STAN J S CATERBONE
vs.
YOLANDA CATERBONE
Case Number
CI-05-07205

08/17/2005
CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT - DJ FILED BY PLAINTIFF. INSTRUMENT DATED JULY 11, 2005.
08/17/2005
RULE 236 NOTICE MAILED ON AUGUST 18, 2005 TO DEFENDANT.
08/17/2005
CAPTION ENTRY IS: STAN J.S. CATERBONE (MA) VS YOLANDA CATERBONE (MA)
05/24/2006
PRAECIPE-WRIT OF EXECUTION FILED. WRIT ISSUED. AMOUNT DUE: $1,703.29, INTEREST

FROM 7/11/05: $100.00. FILED BY: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE.
(IFP FOR THIS PLEADING WAS DENIED, PAYMENT WAS NOT MADE).
05/24/2006
COPY OF 1 WRIT, ORIGINAL WRIT, COPY OF PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF EXECUTION AND COPY OF
DISTRICT JUSTICE TRANSCRIPT SENT TO SHERIFF'S OFFICE MAY 26, 2006.
05/25/2006
ORDER (NO FEE) FILED: AND NOW, THIS 24th DAY OF MAY, 2006, THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND TO WAIVE THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROCEEDING
WITH THE EXECUTION IN THE ABOVE MATTER IS HEREBY DENIED. BY THE COURT: DENNIS
REINACKER, JUDGE. CC'S W/236 NOTICES TO: STAN J. CATERBONE
06/20/2006
POWER OF ATTORNEY (NO FEE) THE PLAINTIFF IN THE ABOVE JUDGMENT, DO HEREBY
ACKNOWLEDGE TO HAVE RECIEVED FULL SATISFACTION FOR THE SAME, AND HEREBY
AUTHORIZE AND EMPOWER THE PROTHONOTARY OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
LANCASTER COUNTY TO ENTER SATISFACTION THEREON AND RELEASE THE SAME. FILED BY:
STAN J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF.
06/20/2006
CASE STATUS-SATISFIED
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 381
308 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
OBLENDERS INC
vs.
STANLEY CATERBONE
Case Number
CI-1988-0443

02/04/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET COMPLAINT FILED BY MARTIN, HONAMAN & LONGO BY ROBERT A.

LONGO, ESQ. AMOUNT CLAIMED IS $6,343.00.
02/04/1988
CASE STATUS-OPEN Judgement
02/05/1988
03/09/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET NOT FOUND AS TO DEFENDANT, STANLEY CATERBONE, SO ANSWERS

03/11/1988
CONVERTED FEE INFORMATION SHERIFF'S COSTS
03/14/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 3:49 P.M. PRAECIPE FILED TO REINSTATE THE COMPLAINT IN THE
ABOVE MATTER.
03/14/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 3:55 P.M. SERVED COMPLAINT ON STANLEY CATERBONE, AT

SHERIFF'S OFFICE, 50 N. DUKE STREET, LANCASTER, PA. SO ANSWERS, JAMES J. WENNER,
DEPUTY SHERIFF OF LANCASTER COUNTY.
03/21/1988
CONVERTED FEE INFORMATION SHERIFF COST
05/04/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 10:54 A.M. DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND CERTIFICATE

OF SERVICE OF SAME FILED.
06/06/1988

06/10/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 12:08 P.M. REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION FILED. CASE NO. 113 1988.
06/10/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 12:08 P.M. PRAECIPE FILED TO CERTIFY SERVICE OF THE REQUEST
FOR ARBITRATION.
06/21/1988
CONVERTED FEE INFORMATION ARBITRATION
08/18/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 1:32 P.M. AWARD FILED. FIND FOR PLAINTIFF IN THE AMOUNT OF
$5,671.00 PLUS INTEREST IN THE AMOUNT OF $184.35 PLUS COSTS OF SUIT AND AGAINST THE
DEFENDANT. JAMES S. SORRENTINO, ESQ., CHAIRMAN, C. E. WALTERS, ATT D. J. WARD, ESQ.
COPIES SENT TO: R.A. LONGO, ESQ. & MICHAEL P. MCDONALD, ESQ.
08/19/1988
CONVERTED FEE INFORMATION APPEAL FEE
09/14/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 4:26 P.M. APPEAL FROM AWARD OF ARBITRATORS FILED.
09/16/1988
CONVERTED FEE INFORMATION APPEAL FEE
10/27/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE HERR PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 212.
11/16/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 10:10 A.M. ORDER FILED - NOW, NOVEMBER 15, 1988, A PRE- TRIAL
CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN JUDGE HERR'S CHAMBERS ON DECEMBER 19, 1988 AT 2:00
P.M. THE COURT DIRECTS ALL COUNSEL TO TIMELY FILE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE MEM
ORANDA IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 212D. LOUISE G. HERR, JUDGE. COPY TO:
ROBERT A. LONGO, ESQ.; MICHAEL P. MCDONALD, ESQ.
11/18/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 3:32 P.M. ORDER FILED - A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR
DECEMBER 19, 1988 AT 2:00 P.M. IS RESCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 27, 1988 AT 10:00 A.M.
LOUISE G. HERR, JUDGE. COPY TO: ROBERT A. LONGO, ESQ.; MICHAEL P. MCDONALD, ESQ.
$250.00 PAID ON BY
$250.00 PAID ON BY

DOCKDETSPage
Page 382
309 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
12/22/1988
Stan J.PRETRIAL
Caterbone
and Advanced
Stan
Media
J.CERTIFICATE
Caterbone,
Group, Pro
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 2:12 P.M. PLAINTIFF'S
MEMORANDUM
AND
OF Se Billing File
SERVICE OF SAME FILED.
12/28/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 9:00 A.M. CERTIFICATION ORDER FILED. CASE PLACED ON TRIAL LIST
FOR JANUARY 25, 1989. JUDGE HERR
01/03/1989
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 1:25 P.M. PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM AND CERTIFICATE OF

SERVICE OF SAME FILED.
10/13/1999
TERMINATED BY LOCAL RULE 350
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 383
310 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
STANLEY J CATERBONE
vs.
SCOTT ROBERTSON
Case Number
CI-1988-0459

02/05/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY THE DEFENDANT. ENTER RULE UPON
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, APPELLEE, TO FILE A COMPLAINT IN THIS APPEAL WITHIN TWENTY
DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF RULE OR SUFFER ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF NON PROS. RULE
ENTERED AS DIRECTED. CLAIR L. WOLF, PROTHONOTARY.
02/08/1988
02/09/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 12:38 P.M. PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AND RULE TO
FILE COMPLAINT FILED.
10/16/1991
CONVERTED DOCKET TERMINATED PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 350.
10/16/1991
TERMINATED BY LOCAL RULE 350 CASE UPDATED ON FEBRUARY 3, 1999 DMH
$45.25 PAID ON 880205 BY DEFN
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 384
311 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Prothonotary
George Alspach
Solicitor
LANCASTER AVIATION INC

vs.
STANLEY J CATERBONE
Case Number
CI-1988-0786

03/01/1988
CASE STATUS-X (SATISFIED-CIVIL
03/01/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY ARNOLD, BEYER & HOMSHER BY: ROBERT
D. BEYER, ESQ. ENTER RULE UPON LANCASTER AVIATION INC, APPELLEE, TO FILE A
COMPLAINT IN THIS APPEAL WITHIN TWENTY DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF RULE OR SUFFER
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF NON PROS. ROBERT D. BEYER, ESQ. RULE ENTERED AS DIRECTED.
CLAIR L. WOLF, PROTHONOTARY.
03/01/1988
03/01/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 4:27 P.M. PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF APPEAL AND RULE TO
FILE COMPLAINT FILED.
03/21/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 10:07 A.M. COMPLAINT FILED BY MARK A. CORCHIN, ESQ., DEBORAH L.
GOLD, ATTY. AT LAW, AND MESIROV, GELMAN, JAFFE, CRAMER AND JAMIESON. AMOUNT
CLAIMED IS $3,376.39, PLUS COSTS AND INTEREST FROM JUNE 29, 1987.
03/24/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 11:53 A.M. PRAECIPE FILED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEARANCE OF

ARNOLD, BEYER AND HOMSHER ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, AND
ENTER THE APPEARANCE OF MICHAEL P. MCDONALD, ESQ. OF WINER AND EINHORN, ON
BEHALF OF DEFENDANT.
04/29/1988
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 11:38 A.M. ANSWER OF DEFENDANT, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, AND

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF SAME FILED.
06/06/1988

01/10/1990
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 9:45 A.M. REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION FILED. CASE NO. 7 1990.
01/10/1990
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 9:45 A.M. CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE OF THE REQUEST FOR

ARBITRATION FILED.
01/11/1990
CONVERTED FEE INFORMATION ARBITRATION
04/12/1990
CONVERTED DOCKET AT 1:32 P.M. ARBITRATORS ANNOUNCES CASE SETTLED.
$45.25 PAID ON 880301 BY DEFN
November 10, 2016

DOCKDETSPage
Page 385
312 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
!" #
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
/
/
#
9
"
"
!
3
,
9
"
!
3
,
#
9
"
!
3
,
/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
/
/
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
"
"
/ /
"
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ 3/
!
/ 3/
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
/ ,/
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
!/ #/
3
!/ #/
3
$ % &'
$&()*%& (* & +$+
$*(
(+ +%
- ( & .+
+ /0+$-.( 0%/%*$1 2+ $'
,3! $*
3
! "$
$4
1
5
4
/.
/.
, 1 2 6 78 6 (
1
5
4
/.
/.
## 9
6
4 8 1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#
)
6 :1
5
4
/.
/.
#!
6(
:1
5
4
/.
/.
#,
$4 8 ): 2 678 $ ;
* .
< # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 #5
4
/.
/.
3=
# ==
.
6:
12
6 %
10 4
7 > 7
3 = #, " == 9 $4 8 *8
1 @
*8
0 4
7 > 7
3 = ! , == ! 1
(
+
4
0 4
7 >
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
3="
==
(
42
/
& .
> 7
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = !3" == *
A 4 0/* ( @B
(
%
6 :
3=
# == 9/ .
- C
/ 4: *88 %
6 :
3=
! == / *
- 47 : %
6 :
#/ 3 = ! , == # 1
*8
0/%
% 66
! =#
== / .
$ 88
6.
%
6 : % 66
3=
9(
/* 4
7& 8
3/ 9/
" D9!!
#
3 = , 3 ==
; ( / 66/& *88 0
3/ 9/
" D9!!
% 66
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = #! 9 ==
6
.
3/ 9/
" % 66
! = #3
== E .2+F
+
/+
8.
8 6: % 66
$(
3# 1 3 .
2
:
:6
6
$(
3# 1 3 .2+ 4
:
.*$
6
8 6
:
?
?
?
?
)6
G!
(&. G
++ /
6+ 8
&$-+
&
and Advanced Media Group,

&. *2$ Stan
* ! J.-Caterbone
( &.
* + & - ( & .+
+ &. *( *A&($2(%&. *%
&
,3! - ( & .+
+
*2$-&(% (& +*%
6& 4
8
Pro Se Billing File
6(
6 : > ,3#?
*% +.&( $+*%
>& 4
? !1
!"
#
# (
%
= 3#
(
*(
+
!(
&'
9
@
'
8 62
9
#
= 3#
8
'
(
*(
!( ,
-(
.(
"(
-
!( 3
*B
66 : >
,,9?
88B
> ,,"? /
1
( 2
*( 3
'
#
,
,
4
US District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvana
Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media

Section 3189 Federal False Claim Act
Property STATE,
of Advance&Media
Group COURT DOCKETS Page
Page 2451
LOCAL,
FEDERAL
395 of
of2953
811
10/19/2006
Sunday November
13, 2016

Group,
Pro Se
Billing
File
Section
3189 Federal
False
Claim Act
Property of
Advance&
Media
Page 2452
LOCAL,
STATE,
FEDERAL
396 of
of2953
811
Sunday November10/19/2006
13, 2016

Group,
Pro Se
Billing
File
Section
3189 Federal
False
Claim Act
Property of
Advance&
Media
Page 2453
LOCAL,
STATE,
FEDERAL
397 of
of2953
811
Sunday November10/19/2006
13, 2016

Pro False
Se Billing
File
SectionGroup,
3189 Federal
Claim Act
Property STATE,
of Advance&Media
Page 2454
LOCAL,
FEDERAL
398 of
of2953
811
10/19/2006
Sunday November
13, 2016
Property of Advance Media Group
Page 2455 of 2953
10/19/2006
Property of Advance Media Group
Page 2456 of 2953
10/19/2006

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Magisterial District Judge 02-1-01

DOCKET
Docket Number: MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016
Non-Traffic Docket
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 1
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Magisterial District Judge Adam J.

Witkonis
Issue Date:
OTN:
File Date:
Arresting Agency:
Lancaster Police Dept
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
R 1345577-2
Disposition:
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
Township:
Lancaster City
Case Status:
10/31/2016
Active
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Active
10/31/2016
Awaiting Plea
DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Name:
Caterbone, Stanley J
Sex:
Male
Date of Birth:
07/15/1958
Race:
White
Address(es):
Other
Lancaster, PA 17603
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Stoltzfus, Glenn M.
CHARGES
# Charge
1 LO 198-4
Grade
S
Filed Date
11/08/2016
Entry
Summons Issued
11/08/2016
10/31/2016
Description
Noise Ordinance
Offense Dt.
10/29/2016
DOCKET ENTRY INFORMATION
Disposition
Filer
Magisterial District Court 02-1-01
Applies To
Stanley J Caterbone, Defendant
First Class Summons Issued
Non-Traffic Citation Filed
CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Case Balance:
Last Payment Amt:
Assessment Type
Postage - Case
$0.50
Next Payment Amt:

Next Payment Due Date:
Assessment Amt
$0.50
Adjustment Amt
$0.00
MDJS 1200
Non-Monetary
Payment Amt
$0.00
Payment Amt
$0.00
Balance
$0.50
Printed: 11/10/2016 9:59 am
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section 9101 et seq.) may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 401
313 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Docket Number: MJ-02101-TR-0002242-2016
Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 2
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:

Witkonis
Issue Date:
OTN:
06/07/2016
File Date:
Arresting Agency:
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
C 3462941-6
Disposition:
Dismissed
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
07/27/2016
Township:
Lancaster City
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
07/28/2016
07/28/2016
07/27/2016
06/24/2016
06/07/2016
Completed
Case Balance Due
Completed
Awaiting Summary Trial
Awaiting Plea
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start Time
Summary Trial
07/27/2016
2:30 pm
Room
Schedule
Status
Judge Name
Magisterial District Judge Adam
J. Witkonis
Scheduled
Name:
Sex:
Date of Birth:
07/15/1958
Race:
Male
Address(es):
Home
Lancaster, PA 17603
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Arresting Officer
Caple, Matthew R.
Defendant
CHARGES
# Charge
1 75 3310 A
Grade
S
Description
Follow Too Closely
MDJS 1200
Offense Dt.
05/13/2016
Disposition
Dismissed
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:00 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 402
314 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 2 of 2
DISPOSITION / SENTENCING DETAILS

Case Disposition
Dismissed
Offense Seq./Description
1 Follow Too Closely
Filed Date
07/27/2016
Entry
Dismissed
06/15/2016
Disposition Date
07/27/2016
Was Defendant Present?
Yes
Offense Disposition
Dismissed
Applies To
Summons Cancelled
Filer
Witkonis
06/15/2016
Not Guilty Plea Entered
Stanley J Caterbone
06/08/2016
Summons Issued
06/08/2016

Witkonis
06/07/2016
Traffic Citation Filed
MDJS 1200
Page 2 of 2
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:00 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 403
315 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Docket Number: MJ-02102-CV-0000137-2016
Civil Docket
Mariner Finance LLC
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 1
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Claim Amount:
Judgment Amount:
Magisterial District Judge David P. Miller

$3,099.98
05/26/2016
Inactive
Lancaster
File Date:
Case Status:
County:
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start Time
Civil Action Hearing
06/24/2016
9:00 am
Room
Schedule
Status
Judge Name
Magisterial District Judge David
P. Miller
Scheduled
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Defendant
Plaintiff
Participant Name
Mariner Finance LLC, Lancaster
Address
Lancaster, PA 17603
Lancaster, PA 17601
DISPOSITION SUMMARY
Docket Number
Filed Date
06/15/2016
06/13/2016
06/03/2016
05/26/2016
Plaintiff
Entry
Restricted Certified Civil Action Hearing
Notice Accepted
Bankruptcy Petition Filed - Civil Case
Restricted Certified Civil Action Hearing
Notice Issued
Civil Complaint Filed
Defendant
Disposition
Disposition Date
Filer
Applies To
Stanley J Caterbone
Mariner Finance LLC
MDJS 1200
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:00 am
omissions on these docket sheets. You should verify that the information is accurate and current by personally consulting the official record reposing in
the court wherein the record is maintained.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 404
316 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Page 1 of 3
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Magisterial District Judge Janice Jimenez
OTN:
Issue Date:
05/19/2016
File Date:
Arresting Agency:
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
F 2712207-1
Disposition:
Guilty
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
06/30/2016
Township:
Lancaster City
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
08/03/2016
07/28/2016
07/28/2016
07/28/2016
07/07/2016
07/01/2016
06/30/2016
06/30/2016
05/27/2016
05/19/2016
Completed
Case Transferred to Court of Common Pleas
Completed
Case Balance Due
Completed
Case Balance Due
Case Disposed/Penalty Imposed
Awaiting Sentencing
Awaiting Plea
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start Time
Summary Trial
06/30/2016
9:00 am
Room
Schedule
Status
Judge Name
Magisterial District Judge
Janice Jimenez
Scheduled
Name:
Caterbone, Stanley J.
Date of Birth:
Sex:
Unreported/Unknown
Race:
Unknown/Unreported
Address(es):
Home
Lancaster, PA 17603
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Fisher, Michael E.
MDJS 1200
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:00 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 405
317 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Page 2 of 3
CHARGES
# Charge
1 LO 285-21 D
Grade
S
Description
NO PARKING-STOPPING PERMITTED
Offense Dt.
03/23/2016
Disposition
Guilty

Disposition Date
06/30/2016
Case Disposition
Guilty
1 NO PARKING-STOPPING PERMITTED
No
Offense Disposition
Guilty
Filed Date
08/03/2016
Entry
Summary Appeal Filed
Filer
Applies To
Stanley J. Caterbone, Defendant
07/01/2016
Order Imposing Sentence Printed
06/30/2016
Guilty
05/27/2016
Summons Cancelled
Magisterial District Judge Janice

Jimenez
05/20/2016
Summons Issued
05/20/2016
05/19/2016
PAYMENT PLAN SUMMARY

Payment Plan No.
02204-2016-P0003003
Payment Plan Freq.

Monthly
Next Due Date
Active
No
Next Due Amt.

$0.00
Overdue Amt.
$0.00
Responsible Participant
Payment Plan History: Payment Dt.
MDJS 1200
Applied Dt.
Transaction Type
Payor
Page 2 of 3
Amount
Participant Role
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:00 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 406
318 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Page 3 of 3

Case Balance:
$0.00
Last Payment Amt:

Assessment Type
Local Ordinance
ATJ
Commonwealth Cost - HB627 (Act 167 of
1992)
County Court Cost (Act 204 of 1976)
Judicial Computer Project
State Court Costs (Act 204 of 1976)
Postage - Case
MDJS 1200
Next Payment Amt:

Assessment Amt
$45.00
$2.00
$8.55
Adjustment Amt
($45.00)
($2.00)
($8.55)
$21.40
$8.00
$8.55
$0.50
($21.40)
($8.00)
($8.55)
($0.50)
Page 3 of 3
Non-Monetary
Payment Amt
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Payment Amt
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Balance
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:00 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 407
319 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Page 1 of 2
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Brian E. Chudzik
Issue Date:
OTN:
File Date:
Arresting Agency:
East Hempfield Township Police Dept
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
E 0007452-4
Disposition:
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
Township:
East Hempfield Township
Case Status:
05/11/2016
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
05/24/2016
05/11/2016
Case Transferred
Awaiting Plea
Name:
Sex:
Date of Birth:
07/15/1958
Race:
Male
Address(es):
Other
Lancaster, PA 17603
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Keen, Christopher M.
CHARGES
# Charge
1 75 3322
Filed Date
05/24/2016
Entry
Summons Cancelled
05/24/2016
Grade
S
Description
VEHICLE TURNING LEFT
Offense Dt.
05/09/2016
Disposition
Filer
Applies To
Case Transfer Accepted
Scott E. Albert
05/11/2016
Summons Issued
05/11/2016
05/11/2016
MDJS 1200
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:01 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 408
320 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Page 2 of 2

Case Balance:
$0.00
Last Payment Amt:

Assessment Type
Motor Vehicle Case Hearing Cost
MDJS 1200
Next Payment Amt:

Assessment Amt
$8.00
Adjustment Amt
($8.00)
Page 2 of 2
Non-Monetary
Payment Amt
$0.00
Payment Amt
$0.00
Balance
$0.00
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:01 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 409
321 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Page 1 of 2
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Scott E. Albert
Issue Date:
OTN:
05/11/2016
File Date:
Arresting Agency:
East Hempfield Township Police Dept
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
E 0007452-4
Disposition:
Guilty
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
06/10/2016
Township:
East Hempfield Township
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
07/19/2016
07/08/2016
07/08/2016
07/08/2016
06/10/2016
06/10/2016
06/10/2016
06/10/2016
05/26/2016
05/11/2016
Completed
Completed
Case Balance Due
Completed
Case Balance Due
Awaiting Sentencing
Awaiting Plea
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start Time
Summary Trial
06/10/2016
9:15 am
Room
Judge Name
Schedule
Status
Scott E. Albert
Scheduled
Name:
Sex:
Date of Birth:
07/15/1958
Race:
Male
Address(es):
Other
Lancaster, PA 17603
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Keen, Christopher M.
MDJS 1200
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:02 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 410
322 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Page 2 of 2
CHARGES
# Charge
1 75 3322
Grade
S
Description
Vehicle Turning Left
Offense Dt.
05/09/2016
Disposition
Guilty

Disposition Date
06/10/2016
Case Disposition
Guilty
1 Vehicle Turning Left
Yes
Offense Disposition
Guilty
Filed Date
07/19/2016
Entry
Filer
Applies To
06/10/2016
06/10/2016
Guilty
Scott E. Albert
05/26/2016
Summons Cancelled
05/11/2016
Summons Issued
05/11/2016
05/11/2016

Case Balance:
Last Payment Amt:
$0.00
Next Payment Amt:

Assessment Type
CAT/MCARE/General Fund
Emergency Medical Services (Act 45 of 1985)
Title 75, Motor Vehicle (Motor License Fund)
ATJ
1992)
Motor Vehicle Case Hearing Cost
MDJS 1200
Assessment Amt
$45.00
$10.00
$25.00
$2.00
$8.55
Adjustment Amt
($45.00)
($10.00)
($25.00)
($2.00)
($8.55)
$21.40
$8.00
$8.55
$8.00
($21.40)
($8.00)
($8.55)
($8.00)
Page 2 of 2
Non-Monetary
Payment Amt
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Payment Amt
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Balance
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:02 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 411
323 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Page 1 of 2
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Magisterial District Judge Bruce A. Roth
Issue Date:
OTN:
03/31/2016
File Date:
Arresting Agency:
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
F 2709730-2
Disposition:
Guilty
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
04/27/2016
Township:
Lancaster City
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
06/03/2016
04/27/2016
04/27/2016
04/27/2016
04/13/2016
03/31/2016
Completed
Case Balance Due
Awaiting Sentencing
Awaiting Plea
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start Time
Summary Trial
04/27/2016
9:00 am
Room
Schedule
Status
Judge Name
Magisterial District Judge Bruce
A. Roth
Scheduled
Name:
Date of Birth:
Sex:
Unreported/Unknown
Race:
Unknown/Unreported
Address(es):
Home
Lancaster, PA 17603
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Gjurich, Thomas
CHARGES
# Charge
1 LO 285-21 C
Grade
S
Description
NO PARKING 2AM TO 6AM
MDJS 1200
Offense Dt.
01/07/2016
Disposition
Guilty
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:02 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 412
324 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Page 2 of 2

Disposition Date
04/27/2016
Case Disposition
Guilty
1 NO PARKING 2AM TO 6AM
No
Offense Disposition
Guilty
Filed Date
04/27/2016
Entry
04/27/2016
Guilty
04/13/2016
04/05/2016
Filer
Applies To
Summons Cancelled
Magisterial District Judge Bruce A.

Roth
Summons Issued
04/05/2016
03/31/2016
PAYMENT PLAN SUMMARY

Payment Plan No.
02202-2016-P0000756
Payment Plan Freq.

Single Payment
Next Due Date
Active
No
Next Due Amt.

$0.00
Overdue Amt.
$0.00
Responsible Participant
Payment Plan History: Payment Dt.
Applied Dt.
06/03/2016 8:07:13AM
06/03/2016
Transaction Type
Payor
Participant Role
Payment
Caterbone, Stan
Remitter
Amount
$93.99

Case Balance:
$0.00
Last Payment Amt:

Assessment Type
Local Ordinance
ATJ
1992)
Postage - Case
MDJS 1200
Next Payment Amt:

Assessment Amt
$45.00
$2.00
$8.55
Adjustment Amt
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21.40
$8.00
$8.55
$0.49
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Page 2 of 2
Non-Monetary
Payment Amt
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Payment Amt
($45.00)
($2.00)
($8.55)
Balance
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
($21.40)
($8.00)
($8.55)
($0.49)
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:02 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 413
325 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 1
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Joshua R. Keller
OTN:
Issue Date:
05/21/2008
File Date:
05/22/2008
Arresting Agency:
Lancaster PSP
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
Q 0256446-1
Disposition:
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
Township:
East Lampeter Township
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
06/10/2008
05/22/2008
Case Transferred
Awaiting Plea
Name:
Sex:
Date of Birth:
07/15/1958
Race:
Male
Address(es):
Other
Lancaster, PA 17603
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Manning, Andrew J.
CHARGES
# Charge
1 75 1543 B1
Filed Date
05/22/2008
Entry
Grade
S
Description
DRG LIC SUS/REV PURS TO SEC 3731/1547B1
Filer
MDJS 1200
Offense Dt.
05/20/2008
Disposition
Applies To
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:02 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 414
326 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 1
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Magisterial District Judge B. Denise

Commins
OTN:
Issue Date:
05/21/2008
File Date:
05/22/2008
Arresting Agency:
Lancaster PSP
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
Q 0256446-1
Disposition:
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
Township:
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
06/03/2008
05/22/2008
Case Transferred
Awaiting Plea
Name:
Sex:
Date of Birth:
07/15/1958
Race:
Male
Address(es):
Other
Lancaster, PA 17603
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Manning, Andrew J.
CHARGES
# Charge
1 75 1543 B1
Filed Date
05/22/2008
Entry
Grade
S
Description
DRG LIC SUS/REV PURS TO SEC 3731/1547B1
Filer
MDJS 1200
Offense Dt.
05/20/2008
Disposition
Applies To
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:03 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 415
327 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 2
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Issue Date:
06/26/2007
File Date:
06/27/2007
Arresting Agency:
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
B 3973605-6
Disposition:
Guilty
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
09/13/2007
Township:
Lancaster City
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
09/13/2007
09/13/2007
09/12/2007
06/27/2007

Awaiting Sentencing
Awaiting Plea
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start Time
Room
Judge Name
Summary Trial
09/12/2007
1:30 pm
Courtroom: MDJ-02-2-04

Richard H. Simms
Schedule
Status
Scheduled
Name:
Sex:
Male
Date of Birth:
07/15/1958
Race:
White
Address(es):
Other
Lancaster, PA 17603
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Heiser, Mark D.
CHARGES
# Charge
1 75 3308 B
Grade
S
Description
Drive Wrong Way
MDJS 1200
Offense Dt.
06/26/2007
Disposition
Guilty
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:03 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 416
328 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 2 of 2

Case Disposition
Guilty
1 Drive Wrong Way
Filed Date
09/13/2007
Entry
Guilty
08/14/2007
06/27/2007
MDJS 1200
Disposition Date
09/13/2007
Yes
Offense Disposition
Guilty
Applies To
Defendant DL-38 Cancelled
Filer
Magisterial District Judge Vacant
MDJ 02-2-04
Page 2 of 2
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:03 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 417
329 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Docket Number: MJ-02204-CR-0000385-2006
Criminal Docket
v.
Stanley Joseph Caterbone
Page 1 of 3
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Issue Date:
08/11/2006
08/11/2006
OTN:
L 304922-2
File Date:
Arresting Agency:
Arrest Date:
Complaint/Incident #:
0608005493
Disposition:
Move to Non-Traffic
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
11/27/2006
Township:
Lancaster City
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
11/27/2006
11/27/2006
11/03/2006
08/25/2006
08/11/2006
Completed
Awaiting Preliminary Hearing
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start Time
Room
Judge Name
Schedule
Status
Preliminary Hearing
09/21/2006
9:00 am
Magisterial District Judge Mary

Mongiovi Sponaugle
Scheduled
Preliminary Arraignment
10/25/2006
1:45 pm

Richard H. Simms
Scheduled
Preliminary Hearing
11/03/2006
9:00 am

Richard H. Simms
Continued
Preliminary Hearing
11/27/2006
9:30 am

Mongiovi Sponaugle
Scheduled
Name:
Caterbone, Stanley Joseph
Sex:
Male
Date of Birth:
07/15/1958
Race:
White
Address(es):
Other
Conestoga, PA 17516
Advised of His Right to Apply for Assignment of Counsel?
Public Defender Requested by the Defendant?
No
Yes
Application Provided for Appointment of Public Defender?

Has the Defendant Been Fingerprinted?
Yes
No
MDJS 1200
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:04 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 418
330 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Criminal Docket
v.
Page 2 of 3
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Gjurich, Thomas
BAIL
Bail Set:
Bail Action Type

Set
Bail Action Date

10/25/2006
Bail Type
Unsecured
Percentage
Amount
$3,000.00
Bail Posted:
Surety Type
Surety Name
Self

Posted
220 Stonehill Road Conestoga, PA 17516
Bail Depositor(s):
Depositor Name
Posting Status
Posted Dt
Security Type
10/25/2006
Bond Signature
Security Amt
$0.00
Amount
CHARGES
# Charge
1 18 5503 A2
Grade
S
Description
Disorderly Conduct-Unreasonable Noise
Offense Dt.
08/04/2006
Disposition
Move to Non-Traffic

Case Disposition
Move to Non-Traffic
1 Disorderly Conduct-Unreasonable Noise
MDJS 1200
Disposition Date
11/27/2006
Yes
Offense Disposition
Move to Non-Traffic (MJ-02204-NT-0001707-2006)
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:04 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 419
331 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Criminal Docket
v.
Page 3 of 3
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
District Attorney
Name: Lancaster County District Attorney's Office

Representing: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Counsel Status: Active
Supreme Court No.:
Phone No.: 717-299-8100
Address:
Lancaster Cnty Courthouse

50 N Duke St Box 13480
Filed Date
11/27/2006
Entry
Move to Non-Traffic
08/31/2006
08/25/2006
Applies To
Stanley Joseph Caterbone, Defendant
Certified Summons Accepted
Filer
MDJ 02-2-04
Summons Issued
08/25/2006
08/25/2006
Certified Summons Issued
08/11/2006
Criminal Complaint Filed
MDJS 1200
Page 3 of 3
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:04 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 420
332 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Non-Traffic Docket
v.
Page 1 of 2
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Issue Date:
11/27/2006
File Date:
08/11/2006
Arresting Agency:
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
0608005493
Disposition:
Guilty
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
11/27/2006
Township:
Lancaster City
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
06/20/2007
06/06/2007
11/27/2006
11/27/2006
11/27/2006
08/11/2006
Completed
Awaiting Sentencing
Awaiting Plea
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start Time
Room
Judge Name
Summary Trial
11/27/2006
9:30 am

Mongiovi Sponaugle
Schedule
Status
Scheduled
Name:
Sex:
Male
Date of Birth:
07/15/1958
Race:
White
Address(es):
Other
Conestoga, PA 17516
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Gjurich, Thomas
CHARGES
# Charge
1 18 5503 A2
Grade
S
Description
Disorderly Conduct-Unreasonable Noise
MDJS 1200
Offense Dt.
08/04/2006
Disposition
Guilty
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:05 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 421
333 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Non-Traffic Docket
v.
Page 2 of 2

Disposition Date
11/27/2006
Case Disposition
Guilty
1 Disorderly Conduct-Unreasonable Noise
Penalty Type
Penalty
Penalty Date
11/27/2006
Yes
Offense Disposition
Guilty
Program Type
IPP
Start Date
11/27/2006
End Date
11/27/2006
Period
Other
Condition: Other
Condition Text: DEFENDANT GIVEN TIME SERVED IN LIEU OF FINE AND COSTS
Filed Date
06/20/2007
Entry
06/06/2007
11/27/2006
Case Transferred to Court of Common

Pleas
Guilty
08/11/2006
MDJS 1200

Filer
Applies To

MDJ 02-2-04
Page 2 of 2
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:05 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 422
334 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 3
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Magisterial District Judge Jene Willwerth
OTN:
Issue Date:
06/23/2006
File Date:
07/11/2006
Arresting Agency:
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
B 3001276-5
Disposition:
Guilty
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
05/23/2007
Township:
Lancaster City
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
05/30/2007
05/30/2007
05/23/2007
05/23/2007
05/23/2007
05/23/2007
05/08/2007
04/09/2007
02/22/2007
07/11/2006

Completed
Completed
Case Balance Due
Awaiting Sentencing
Awaiting Plea
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start Time
Room
Judge Name
Summary Trial
02/22/2007
2:30 pm
Magisterial District Judge Kelly

S. Ballentine
Continued
Summary Trial
04/09/2007
11:00 am

S. Ballentine
Continued
Summary Trial
05/08/2007
10:45 am

S. Ballentine
Scheduled
Schedule
Status
Name:
Sex:
Date of Birth:
07/15/1958
Race:
Male
Address(es):
Other
Conestoga, PA 17516
MDJS 1200
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:05 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 423
335 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 2 of 3
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Defendant
Arresting Officer
Whiteford, Robert W.
CHARGES
# Charge
1 75 1786 F
Grade
S
Description
Oper Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp
Offense Dt.
06/23/2006
Disposition
Guilty

Case Disposition
Guilty
1 Oper Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp
Filed Date
05/30/2007
Disposition Date
05/23/2007
No
Offense Disposition
Guilty
05/30/2007
Entry
Case Transferred to Court of Common
Pleas
05/23/2007
Guilty
12/19/2006
Certified Summons Undeliverable
Magisterial District Judge Kelly S.

Ballentine
11/30/2006
Summons Issued
11/30/2006
07/12/2006
Summons Issued
07/12/2006
07/11/2006
MDJS 1200
Filer
Applies To
Stanley J Caterbone

Page 2 of 3
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:05 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 424
336 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 3 of 3

Case Balance:
Last Payment Amt:
$0.00
Next Payment Amt:

Assessment Type
Postage - Case
Postage - Case
Emergency Medical Services (Act 45 of 1985)
ATJ
1992)
Title 75, Motor Vehicle (Motor License Fund)
MDJS 1200
Assessment Amt
$0.50
$5.00
$10.00
$30.00
$8.00
$2.00
$17.60
$6.95
$6.95
Adjustment Amt
($0.50)
($5.00)
($10.00)
($30.00)
($8.00)
($2.00)
($17.60)
($6.95)
($6.95)
$300.00
($300.00)
Page 3 of 3
Non-Monetary
Payment Amt
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Payment Amt
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Balance
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:05 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 425
337 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Criminal Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 2
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
Scott E. Albert
Issue Date:
10/18/2005
10/18/2005
OTN:
L 260045-2
File Date:
Arresting Agency:
East Lampeter Township Police Dept
Arrest Date:
NONE
Disposition:
Withdrawn
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
12/05/2005
Township:
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
12/05/2005
12/05/2005
11/17/2005
10/18/2005
Completed
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start Time
Room
Judge Name
Preliminary Hearing
11/17/2005
3:00 pm

William G. Reuter
Continued
Preliminary Hearing
12/05/2005
9:00 am

Ronald W. Savage
Scheduled
Schedule
Status
Name:
Sex:
Male
Date of Birth:
07/15/1954
Race:
White
Address(es):
Other
Conestoga, PA 17516
No
No

No
No
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Arresting Officer
Bezzard, Ronald S
Defendant
MDJS 1200
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:06 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 426
338 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Criminal Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 2 of 2
CHARGES
# Charge
1 18 2709 A7
Grade
M3
Description
Harassment - Comm. Repeatedly in Another Manner
Offense Dt.
10/06/2005
Disposition
Withdrawn

Case Disposition
Withdrawn
1 Harassment - Comm. Repeatedly in Another Manner
Disposition Date
12/05/2005
Yes
Offense Disposition
Withdrawn
District Attorney

Supreme Court No.:
Phone No.: 717-299-8100
Address:

Filed Date
12/05/2005
Entry
Withdrawn
10/31/2005
Applies To
Certified Summons Accepted
Filer
Magisterial District Judge William G.
Reuter
10/21/2005
Subpoena Issued via Hand Delivery
Restricted Participant
10/21/2005
Summons Issued
10/21/2005
10/21/2005
10/18/2005
MDJS 1200
Page 2 of 2
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:06 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 427
339 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Criminal Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 2
CASE INFORMATION
Issue Date:
10/18/2005
OTN:

Commins
L 260045-2
File Date:
10/18/2005
Arresting Agency:
Arrest Date:
NONE
Disposition:
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
Township:
Case Status:
Judge Assigned:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
11/17/2005
10/18/2005
Case Transferred
Name:
Sex:
Male
Date of Birth:
07/15/1954
Race:
White
Address(es):
Other
Conestoga, PA 17516
No
No

No
No
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Arresting Officer
Bezzard, Ronald S
Defendant
CHARGES
# Charge
1 18 2709 A7
Grade
M3
Description
HARASSMENT
Offense Dt.
10/06/2005
Disposition
District Attorney
Supreme Court No.:
Phone No.: 717-299-8100
Address:
MDJS 1200

Printed: 11/10/2016 10:06 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 428
340 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Criminal Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 2 of 2
Filed Date
10/18/2005
MDJS 1200
Entry
Filer
Page 2 of 2
Applies To
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:06 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 429
341 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Non-Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 1
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:

Commins
OTN:
Issue Date:
10/06/2005
File Date:
10/11/2005
Arresting Agency:
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
P 4985908-4
Disposition:
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
Township:
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
11/17/2005
10/11/2005
Case Transferred
Awaiting Plea
Name:
Sex:
Male
Date of Birth:
07/15/1954
Race:
White
Address(es):
Other
Conestoga, PA 17516
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Arresting Officer
Bezzard, Ronald S
Defendant
CHARGES
# Charge
1 18 5503 A2
Filed Date
10/11/2005
Grade
S
Entry
Description
DISORDERLY CONDUCT
Filer
MDJS 1200
Offense Dt.
10/06/2005
Disposition
Applies To
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:06 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 430
342 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKET
Non-Traffic Docket
v.
Stanley J Caterbone
Page 1 of 1
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:

Commins
OTN:
Issue Date:
10/06/2005
File Date:
10/11/2005
Arresting Agency:
Arrest Date:
Citation #:
P 4985907-3
Disposition:
County:
Lancaster
Disposition Date:
Township:
Case Status:
Closed
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status
Status Date
Processing Status
Closed
11/17/2005
10/11/2005
Case Transferred
Awaiting Plea
Name:
Sex:
Male
Date of Birth:
07/15/1954
Race:
White
Address(es):
Other
Conestoga, PA 17516
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Participant Name
Arresting Officer
Bezzard, Ronald S
Defendant
CHARGES
# Charge
1 18 3926 A4
Filed Date
10/11/2005
Grade
Entry
Description
THEFT OF SERVICES
Filer
MDJS 1200
Offense Dt.
10/06/2005
Disposition
Applies To
Printed: 11/10/2016 10:07 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 431
343 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
CHAPTER
DIVIDER

DOCKDETSPage
Page 432
344 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
10:16 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Commonwealth Docket Sheet
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Docket Number: 2086 CD 2006

Page 1 of 2
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Stanley J. Caterbone,
Appellant
v.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
Department of Transportation,
Bureau of Driver Licensing
CASE INFORMATION
Initiating Document:
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Closed
Case Processing Status:
June 15, 2011
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Driver's License Suspension

RELATED CASES
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Yes
Yes
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:

220 Stone Hill Rd
Conestoga, PA 17516
(717) 431-8184
Phone No:
Appellee
Pro Se:
Fax No: (717) 427-1821
Bureau of Driver Licensing
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Edwards, Terrance M.
PA Department of Transportation
PennDOT Vehicle & Traffic
1101 S Front St 3rd Fl
Harrisburg, PA 17104-2516
(717) 787-2830
Fax No:
AGENCY/TRIAL COURT INFORMATION
Court Below:
County:
Order Appealed From:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas

Lancaster
Division:
August 17, 2006
Judicial District:
November 8, 2006
Notice of Appeal Filed:
Order Entered
Lower Ct Docket No(s):
CI-06-06658
Lancaster County Civil Division

02
August 25, 2006
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Courts nor the Administrative
Office
of Pennsylvania Courts assumesThursday
any
liability November 13,
LOCAL, STATE, & FEDERAL
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 433
345 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on the docket sheets.
10:16 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Commonwealth Docket Sheet
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Docket Number: 2086 CD 2006

Page 2 of 2
November 10, 2016
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Cullen, James P.
Judge
ORIGINAL RECORD CONTENT
Original Record Item
Filed Date
Content Description
Date of Remand of Record:

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Docket Entry / Filer
August 25, 2006
Notice of Appeal Filed

September 27, 2006
Representing
Participant Type
Exit Date
Appellant
Order - Transfer to Commonwealth Court

Superior Court
November 8, 2006
Transfer from Another Court
November 8, 2006
Send Back for Correction
11/08/2006
Commonwealth Court Filing
Office
Document Name: Case transferred from Superior Court (1462 MDA 2006) To Commonwealth Court (2086 CD 2006)
Commonwealth Court Filing
Office
Document Name: Lacks service on opposing counsel and lower court judge (names and addresses)
November 27, 2006
Dismissed
Per Curiam
11/28/2006
Comment: This matter is dismissed due to petitioner's failure to comply with this court's 11/8/06 defect correction
letter.
DISPOSITION INFORMATION
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
Disposition Comment:
This matter is dismissed due to petitioner's failure to comply with this court's 11/8/06 defect correction
letter.
Filing Author:
Dispositional Filing:
Filed Date:
Decided
Dismissed
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
November 27, 2006

Per Curiam
November 27, 2006
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 434
346 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:17 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Docket Number: 1915 MDA 2015

Page 1 of 5
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
and Advanced Media Group
v.
Lancaster City Police
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Decided/Active
June 13, 2016
Journal Number:
J-A14034-16
Case Category:
Criminal
Awaiting Supreme Court Decision
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Other
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
1561 MDA 2015

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type: Appellee Brief Filed

Next Event Type: Record Remitted
Next Event Due Date: March 14, 2016

Next Event Due Date: June 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Yes
Pending
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Appellee
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
No
Stedman, Craig William
Lancaster County District Attorney's Office
50 N. Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 299-8100
Fax No:
Gonzalez, Andrew James
Lancaster CO Da's Office
50 N Duke St
(717) 299-8100
Fax No:
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 435
347 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:17 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 5
November 10, 2016
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
10/19/2015
Notice of Appeal
85.50 11/02/2015
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2015-SPR-M-001010
85.50
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
September 29, 2015
Judicial District:
November 2, 2015
Order Entered
CP-36-MD-0001108-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Reinaker, Dennis E.
President Judge
Lancaster County Criminal Division

02
October 19, 2015
Filed Date
Content Description
Original Record
January 20, 2016
3 Parts

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellee
Brief
Appellant
Brief
Due: February 29, 2016
Due: March 14, 2016
Filed: February 12, 2016
Filed:
Reproduced Record

DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Docket Entry / Representing
November 2, 2015
Notice of Appeal Docketed
November 5, 2015
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Docketing Statement Exited (Criminal)

Middle District Filing Office
November 12, 2015
November 15, 2015
November 25, 2015
Docketing Statement Received (Criminal)

Appellant
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

Appellant
Order Denying Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

Per Curiam
Comment: Upon consideration of the application of appellant, Stanley J.

Caterbone, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the application is hereby
DENIED.
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 436
348 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:17 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 5
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
January 19, 2016
Trial Court Record Received
Participant Type
Filed By
Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas
January 19, 2016
Trial Court Opinion Received

Pleas
January 28, 2016
Application for Relief

Appellant
Document Name: Motion to File Exhibit

February 3, 2016
Order Denying Application for Relief

Per Curiam
Comment: Upon consideration of the application of appellant, Stanley J.

Caterbone, for leave to file an exhibit in this matter, the application is
hereby DENIED. See Commonwealth v. Preston, 904 A.2d 1 (Pa. Super.
2006) (Superior Court may not consider any document which is not part of
the officially certified record), appeal denied, 916 A.2d 632 (Pa. 2007).
February 12, 2016
February 12, 2016
February 12, 2016
Appellant's Brief Filed

Appellant
Appellant
Reproduced Record Filed

Reply Letter(s) Printed
February 13, 2016
Reply Received (Argument)

Appellant
February 22, 2016
February 22, 2016
March 11, 2016
April 1, 2016
Entry of Appearance - District Attorney

Appellee
Application to Quash Appeal

Appellee
Appellant
Answer to Application to Quash Appeal

Deferred to Time of Disposition
Per Curiam
Comment: Disposition of appellee's motion to quash this appeal, is hereby deferred to the panel that will decide
the merits of this appeal.
April 18, 2016
Argument Letter Sent

Comment: 4/20/2016: Parties were contacted via email and advised that argument in this case has been moved
to Tuesday, May 24, 2016 at 9:00AM.
April 21, 2016
Acknowledgement of Argument Notice

Appellant
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 437
349 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:17 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 4 of 5
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
May 11, 2016
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Document Name: "Motion to File Exhibit"

Quashed
May 11, 2016
Platt, William
Comment: Commonwealth's Motion Granted. Appeal Quashed.
May 12, 2016
Per Curiam
Comment:
AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2016, Appellant's Motion to File Exhibit, filed May 11, 2016, is
hereby DENIED as moot.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal to PA Supreme Court Filed
June 13, 2016

Comment: Filed in Supreme Court: 6/7/2016.
July 25, 2016

Comment: Filed in Supreme Court: 6/7/2016
SESSION INFORMATION
Journal Number:
Consideration Type:
Listed/Submitted Date:
J-A14034-16
Quashed
May 25, 2016
Panel Composition:
The Honorable Mary Jane Bowes
The Honorable Paula Francisco Ott
The Honorable William H. Platt
Judge
Judge
Judge
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
J-A14034-16
Decided
Quashed
Filed Date:
Commonwealth's Motion Granted. Appeal Quashed.

Memorandum
Filing Author:
5/11/2016 12:00:00AM
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
May 11, 2016

Platt, William
May 11, 2016
Platt, William
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 438
350 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:17 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 5 of 5
November 10, 2016
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
Petition Reargument/Reconsideration Filed Date:
Reargument Disposition:
Reargument Disposition Date:
Cross Court Action Type:
354 MT 2016
Supreme
Caterbone, S etal v. Lanc Police Pet of: Caterbone
Closed
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
496 MAL 2016

Supreme
Decided/Active
Order Denying Petition for Allowance of Appeal
October 25, 2016
Filing of Decision or Opinion
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 439
351 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:17 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 5
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Appellant
v.
Residents of the County of Lancaster Pennsylvania
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Decided/Active
July 25, 2016
Journal Number:
J-A06020-16
J-A14016-16
Case Category:
Civil
Awaiting Supreme Court Decision
Case Type(s):
Civil Action Law
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
1915 MDA 2015

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type: Record Remitted

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
No
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
11/05/2015
11/15/2015
Notice of Appeal
Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification
85.50 11/12/2015
15.00 12/10/2015
Receipt No
2015-SPR-M-001026
2015-SPR-M-001106
Receipt Amt
85.50
15.00
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
August 20, 2015
Judicial District:
September 16, 2015
Order Entered
CI-15-06985
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Wright, Jeffery D.
Judge

02
September 8, 2015
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 440
352 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:17 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 5
November 10, 2016
Filed Date
Content Description
Original Record
Supplemental Record
November 05, 2015

November 24, 2015
1 Part
1 Part (Opinion)

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellant
Brief
Due: December 15, 2015
None
Filed: December 7, 2015
Reproduced Record
Due: December 15, 2015
Filed: December 7, 2015

DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
Filed By
September 16, 2015

Appellant

Appellant
No
proof
of
service.
Comment:
Comment: No proof of service.

September 16, 2015
September 16, 2015
Docketing Statement Exited (Civil)

September 28, 2015
Docketing Statement Received (Civil)

Appellant
October 2, 2015

Per Curiam
Comment: Upon consideration of the application of appellant, Stanley Caterbone,

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, the application is hereby
DENIED.
October 14, 2015
October 23, 2015
Application for Reconsideration of Order

Appellant
Appellant
October 28, 2015

Per Curiam
Comment: Upon consideration of the motion of appellant, Stanley Caterbone, for

leave to file a certain document as an Exhibit to be considered by this Court,
to the extent such document is not part of the certified record for appeal,
the motion is hereby DENIED. See Rosselli v. Rosselli, 750 A.2d 355,
359 (Pa. Super. 2000) (Superior Court may review and consider only items
which are part of the certified record for appeal), appeal denied, 764 A.2d
50 (Pa. 2000).
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 441
353 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:17 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 5
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
October 30, 2015
Order Denying Application for Reconsideration of Order
Filed By
Per Curiam
Comment: Upon consideration of the application of appellant, Stanley Caterbone,

for reconsideration of this Court's October 2, 2015 order denying his request
for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the application is hereby DENIED.
November 5, 2015
Trial Court Record Received - Partial

Pleas
Comment: No Opinion
11/24/15 - Received Opinion
November 5, 2015
Letter sent regarding Missing Items in Record

Comment: No Opinion
Appellant
Comment: Request for reconsideration of 10/2/15 Order.
November 15, 2015
November 24, 2015
Supplemental Record Filed

Pleas
Document Name: Opinion

November 25, 2015

Per Curiam
Comment: Upon consideration of the second application of appellant, Stanley

Caterbone, for reconsideration of this Court's October 2, 2015 order denying
his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the application is hereby
DENIED.
December 7, 2015
December 7, 2015
Appellant's Brief and Reproduced Record Combined Filed

Appellant

December 15, 2015
Reply Received (Argument)

Appellant
January 22, 2016

January 28, 2016
February 12, 2016
February 29, 2016

Appellant
Appellant
Appellant

Application for Continuance
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 442
354 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:17 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 4 of 5
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
March 1, 2016
Order Granting Application for Continuance
Filed By
Per Curiam
Comment: AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2016, the appellant's Motion for Extension of Time (Request for
Continuance) is hereby GRANTED. The Prothonotary is directed to reschedule oral argument on the
next available panel.
April 18, 2016

April 21, 2016
Appellant
Appeal Dismissed
May 10, 2016
Ott, Paula Francisco

Comment: Appeal dismissed. Jurisdiction relinquished. Application for Relief denied.
May 11, 2016
Appellant
Comment: Originally PACFiled under 1915 MDA 2015 (filing included both docket numbers).
May 12, 2016
Per Curiam
Comment: AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2016, Appellant's Motion to File Exhibit, filed May 11, 2016, is
hereby DENIED as moot.
July 25, 2016

Appellant
Comment: Filed in Supreme Court on 6/7/16 @ 495 MAL 2016.
SESSION INFORMATION
Journal Number:
Consideration Type:
J-A06020-16
Continued
March 15, 2016
Panel Composition:
The Honorable Anne E. Lazarus
The Honorable Victor P. Stabile
The Honorable Alice B. Dubow
Journal Number:
Consideration Type:
Judge
Judge
Judge
J-A14016-16
Dismissed
May 24, 2016
Panel Composition:
The Honorable Mary Jane Bowes
The Honorable Paula Francisco Ott
The Honorable William H. Platt
Judge
Judge
Judge
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 443
355 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:17 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 5 of 5
November 10, 2016
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
J-A14016-16
Decided
Appeal Dismissed
Filed Date:
Appeal dismissed. Jurisdiction relinquished. Application for Relief denied.

Memorandum
Filing Author:
5/10/2016 12:00:00AM
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
May 10, 2016

May 10, 2016
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
353 MT 2016
Supreme
Caterbone, S., Pet. v. Residents of Lancaster Co.
Closed
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
495 MAL 2016

Supreme
Decided/Active
October 25, 2016
Filing of Decision or Opinion
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 444
356 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:18 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Stanley J. Caterbone, Appellant

v.
Southern Regional Police Dept., Chief John A. Fiorill, Officer Buzzer and Officer Fedor
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal IFP
Case Status:
Closed
November 21, 2006
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
Civil Action Law
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
1462 MDA 2006

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1463 MDA 2006

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:
Next Event Due Date:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Yes
Yes
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Appellee
Pro Se:

1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Southern Regional Police Dept., Chief John A. Fiorill, Officer Buzzer and Officer Fedor
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Kovaly, Cheryl Lynn
Lavery, Faherty, Young & Patterson, P.C.
225 Market St Ste 304
PO Box 1245
(717) 233-6633
Fax No: (717) 233-7003
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:

Lancaster
Division:
September 13, 2006
Judicial District:
August 29, 2006
Judgment Entered

02
July 25, 2006
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 445
357 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:18 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
OTN(s):
CI-06-03401
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Georgelis, Michael A.
Judge
Filed Date
Content Description
Part
September 08, 2006
Date of Remand of Record: November 21, 2006

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
August 30, 2006
Notice of Appeal IFP Docketed
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Comment: AWAITING PROOF OF SERVICE TO L/C JUDGE AND COURT REPORTER FROM APPELLANT
9/19/06 - OE CHANGED TO JE PURSUANT TO CERT COPY OF T/C DOCKET ENTRIES
August 30, 2006

September 8, 2006

Lower Court or Agency
September 11, 2006
September 18, 2006
September 19, 2006
Docketing Statement Received

Appellant
Appellee
Southern Regional Police Dept.,

Chief John A. Fiorill, Officer Buzzer
and Officer Fedor
Briefing Schedule Stayed Sua Sponte

Per Curiam
Comment: PENDING DISPO OF THE MOTION TO QUASH

October 12, 2006
Quashed
Per Curiam
November 21, 2006
Remitted
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Filed Date:
Yes
Decided
Quashed
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Filing Author:
October 12, 2006

Per Curiam
October 12, 2006
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 446
358 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:18 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
REARGUMENT / RECONSIDERATION / REMITTAL
Filed Date:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
Record Remittal:
November 21, 2006
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 447
359 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:18 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION

v.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
November 6, 2006
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
Civil Action Law
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
1461 MDA 2006

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1463 MDA 2006

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Yes
Yes
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:

220 Stone Hill Rd
Conestoga, PA 17516
(717) 431-8184
Phone No:
Appellee
Pro Se:
Fax No: (717) 427-1821
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
PennDOT Vehicle & Traffic
1101 S Front St 3rd Fl
(717) 787-2830
Fax No:
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:

Lancaster
Division:
August 17, 2006
Judicial District:
August 29, 2006
Order Entered

02
August 25, 2006
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 448
360 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:18 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
OTN(s):
CI-06-06658
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Cullen, James P.
Judge
Filed Date
Content Description

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
August 30, 2006
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Comment: AWAITING PROOF OF SERVICE TO L/C JUDGE, OPPOSING COUNSEL & COURT REPORTER
FROM APPELLANT
August 30, 2006

September 11, 2006

Appellant
Appellee
Department of Transportation
Document Name: Praecipe for Appearance Edwards, Terrance M.
September 21, 2006
September 21, 2006
September 27, 2006
Praecipe for Appearance
Application to Transfer to Commonwealth Court

Appellee
Department of Transportation
Transfer to Commonwealth Court
Per Curiam
Comment: 11/6/06 - N/A, DOCKET ENTRIES & CERT COPY OF OE 9/27/06 EXIT TO COMM CRT
November 6, 2006
Remitted - No Trial Court Record

November 8, 2006
Transfer Accepted
Superior Court
Document Name:
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
Decided
Transfer to Commonwealth Court
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
September 27, 2006

Per Curiam
September 27, 2006
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 449
361 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:18 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
Filed Date:
11/6/06 - N/A, DOCKET ENTRIES & CERT COPY OF OE 9/27/06 EXIT TO COMM CRT
Filing Author:
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
2086 CD 2006
Commonwealth
Caterbone, S. v. Dept. of Transportation
Closed
Dismissed
November 27, 2006
Case Initiation
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 450
362 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:19 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Fulton Bank
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
February 12, 2007
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
Mortgage Foreclosure
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
1461 MDA 2006

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1462 MDA 2006

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Yes
Yes
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Appellee
Pro Se:

1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Fulton Bank
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Long, Shawn Michael
Barley Snyder, L.L.C.
126 E King St
(717) 399-1512
Fax No: (717) 291-4660
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
June 29, 2006
Judicial District:
August 29, 2006
Order Entered
CI-06-02271

02
July 25, 2006
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 451
363 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:19 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Judge
Filed Date
Content Description
Part
September 08, 2006
Date of Remand of Record: February 12, 2007

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellee
Fulton Bank
Brief
Appellant
Brief
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
August 30, 2006
August 30, 2006
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant

September 8, 2006

September 11, 2006

Appellant
January 4, 2007
Dismissed for Failure to File Brief

Per Curiam

Appellant
Comment: 248 MAL 2007
February 5, 2007
February 12, 2007
Remitted
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Filed Date:
Yes
Disposed Before Decision
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Filing Author:
January 4, 2007
Per Curiam
January 4, 2007
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 452
364 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:19 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
71 MT 2007
Supreme
Fulton Bank v. Caterbone, Pet.
Closed
Transfer
March 22, 2007
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
248 MAL 2007

Supreme
Closed
July 6, 2007
July 20, 2007
Order Denying Application for Reconsideration
August 31, 2007
Case Initiation
Case Initiation
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 453
365 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:20 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Advanced Media Group, Appellant
v.
Mr. Donald Totaro, Lancaster County District Attorney, et al
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Closed
July 17, 2007
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
Civil Action Law
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
951 MDA 2007

Same Record Below
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Yes
Pending
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Appellee
Pro Se:
Totaro, Donald
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Totaro, Donald R.
50 N Duke St
(717) 299-8100
Fax No:
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
May 11, 2007
Judicial District:
June 1, 2007
Order Entered
CI-07-00366

02
May 24, 2007
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 454
366 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:20 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Allison, Paul K.
Judge
Filed Date
Content Description

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
May 24, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
June 4, 2007

June 18, 2007
Appellant
Order - Rule to Show Cause
June 27, 2007
Per Curiam
Comment: APPELLANT TO SHOW CAUSE W/IN 10 DAYS WHY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PRESERVE ISSUES FOR APPEAL. IF, FOLLOWING REC'T OF RESPONSE IT IS
DETERMINED THAT NO ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN, THE ISSUE WILL BE REFERRED TO THE
PANEL ASSIGNED TO DCIDE THE MERITS OF THE APPEAL. THE APPEAL WILL CONTINUE
W/OUT FURTHER NOTICE TO THE PARTIES.
7/9/07 - RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER REC'D & EXIT TO CRT
Dismissed Sua Sponte
July 17, 2007
Per Curiam
Comment: THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT APPELLANT SOUGHT RELIEF FROM THE JUDGMENT OF NON
PROS
July 17, 2007

Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT APPELLANT SOUGHT RELIEF FROM THE JUDGMENT OF NON
PROS
Filing Author:
Filed Date:

Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
July 17, 2007

Per Curiam
July 17, 2007
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 455
367 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:20 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
432 MT 2007
Supreme
Caterbone, Pet v. Totaro, Lancaster Cty D.A et al
Closed
Transfer
October 3, 2007
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
152 MM 2007
Supreme
Closed
Order Denying Petition for Review
November 8, 2007
Case Initiation
Case Initiation
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 456
368 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:20 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION

v.
Mr. Donald Totaro, Lancaster District Attorney et al
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Closed
July 17, 2007
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
Civil Action Law
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
950 MDA 2007

Same Record Below
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Yes
Pending
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Appellee
Pro Se:
Totaro et al, Donald R.
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Munion, Christine Elizabeth
William J. Ferren & Associates
100 W Elm St Ste 200
Conshohocken, PA 19428
(610) 397-4620
Fax No:
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
February 21, 2007
Judicial District:
June 1, 2007
Order Entered
CI-07-00366

02
May 24, 2007
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 457
369 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:20 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Allison, Paul K.
Judge
Filed Date
Content Description

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
May 24, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
June 1, 2007

June 15, 2007
Appellant
June 27, 2007
Per Curiam
Comment: WHY THIS APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY FILED W/IN 10 DAYS
7/9/07 - RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER REC'D & EXIT TO CRT
Quash Sua Sponte
July 17, 2007
Per Curiam
Comment: AS UNTIMELY FILED
July 17, 2007

Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
Filed Date:
AS UNTIMELY FILED

Quash Sua Sponte
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
July 17, 2007

Per Curiam
July 17, 2007
Filing Author:
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 458
370 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:20 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
433 MT 2007
Supreme
Caterbone, Pet v. Totato, Lancaster Cty D.A. et al
Closed
Transfer
October 3, 2007
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
153 MM 2007
Supreme
Closed
November 8, 2007
Case Initiation
Case Initiation
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 459
371 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:20 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 4
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania/Dept of Transportation

v.
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Closed
November 10, 2008
Journal Number:
J-S10032-08
Case Category:
Civil
Completed
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
125 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
855 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1097 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1565 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2052 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2053 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
113 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
234 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Pending
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 460
372 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:20 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 4
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
No
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Cramer, Harold H.
Riverfront Office Center
3rd Floor, 1101 S. Front St.
(717) 787-2830
Fax No:
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
03/27/2008
07/08/2011
Petition for Reargument

Copy Work (Per Page)
15.00
1.50 07/08/2011
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2011-SPR-M-000593
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
June 6, 2007
Judicial District:
June 28, 2007
Order Entered
CI-07-05230
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Perezous, Michael J.
Senior Judge

02
June 12, 2007
Filed Date
Content Description
NO OPINION
Part
August 08, 2007

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellee
Brief
Appellant
Brief
Due: September 17, 2007
Due: November 28, 2007
Filed: October 23, 2007
Filed: November 2, 2007
Reproduced Record
Filed:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
June 12, 2007
June 29, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant

NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 461
373 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
0.00
1.50
10:20 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 4
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
July 10, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
August 8, 2007

October 23, 2007
Appellant's Brief Filed Late

Appellant
October 24, 2007
Submitted on Brief
Comment: APLT BRIEF FILED LATE

November 2, 2007
No Brief to be Filed by Appellee

Appellee
Comment: SEE LETTER IN LIEU OF BRIEF.

February 20, 2008
Affirmed
Per Curiam
Comment: 4/8/08 - DECISION IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.

Application for Reconsideration/Reargument
Appellant
Comment: **REQUESTED FILING FEE AND 21 MORE COPIES FROM PRO SE APLT**
February 27, 2008
Order Granting Application for Reargument/Reconsideration
April 8, 2008
Per Curiam
Comment: DECN FILED 2/20/08 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.
THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY DIRECTED TO FILE BRIEFS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PA RAP
2140(EACH PARTY SHALL, WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD SPECIFIED, EITHER REFILE THE BRIEF
PREVIOUSLY FILED TOGETHER WITH A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IF DESIRED, OR PREPARE
AND FILE A SUBSTITUTE BRIEF.)
4/30/08 - BRIEF ON REARGUMENT FILED BY APLT(1 COPY) - MADE ADDT'L COPIES FOR HIM.
October 1, 2008
Reversed/Remanded
Per Curiam
Comment: JURISDICTION RELINUISHED

November 10, 2008
Remitted
November 18, 2008
Acknowledgement of Record Remittal

NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 462
374 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:20 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 4 of 4
November 10, 2016
SESSION INFORMATION
Journal Number:
Consideration Type:
J-S10032-08
Submitted on Briefs-Panel
January 14, 2008
Panel Composition:
Judge
Judge
President Judge Emeritus
The Honorable Joan Orie Melvin

The Honorable Maureen Lally-Green
The Honorable Stephen J. McEwen Jr.
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
No
J-S10032-08
Decided
Affirmed
Filed Date:
4/8/08 - DECISION IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.

Judgment Order
Filing Author:
2/20/2008 12:00:00AM
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
J-S10032-08
Decided
Reversed/Remanded
Filed Date:
JURISDICTION RELINUISHED
Judgment Order
10/1/2008 12:00:00AM
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
February 20, 2008

Per Curiam
February 20, 2008
Per Curiam
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
October 1, 2008
Per Curiam
October 1, 2008
Filing Author:
Per Curiam
Filed Date:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
February 27, 2008

Order Granting Application for Reargument/Reconsideration
April 8, 2008
Record Remittal:
November 10, 2008
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 463
375 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 4
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
March 25, 2008
Journal Number:
J-A02002-08
Case Category:
Criminal
Completed
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Harassment
Disorderly Conduct
Theft
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
855 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1097 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1103 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1565 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2052 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2053 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
113 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
234 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Yes
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 464
376 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 4
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
No
Totaro, Donald R.
50 N Duke St
(717) 299-8100
Fax No:
Muzereus, Deborah L.
50 N Duke St PO Box 83480
(717) 299-8100
Fax No: (717) 295-3693
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
December 5, 2006
Judicial District:
January 18, 2007
Judgment of Sentence
L2600452
CP-36-CR-0002843-2006
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Farina, Louis J.
Judge

02
January 4, 2007
Filed Date
Content Description
Part
Transcripts
Supplemental Part
March 14, 2007

March 14, 2007
March 29, 2007
1
1
1
Date of Remand of Record: March 25, 2008

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellee
Brief
Appellant
Brief
Due: May 23, 2007
Filed: May 22, 2007
Due: June 21, 2007
Filed: June 20, 2007
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
January 18, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Comment: ** AWAITING PROOF OF SERVICE FROM APPELLANT SHOWING T/C JUDGE AND DA WERE
SERVED WITH A COPY OF NOTICE OF APPEAL**
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 465
377 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 4
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
January 19, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Comment: 2/23/07 DOCKETING STATEMENT EXIT

February 20, 2007
Order Directing Compliance with Pa.R.A.P. 3517
Due Date:
Per Curiam
Comment: DUE ON MARCH 2, 2007

March 2, 2007
Appellant
March 14, 2007

April 24, 2007
Application for Extension of Time to File Brief - First Request

Appellant
Comment: AWAITING PROOF OF SERVICE UPON DA.
Order Granting Application for Extension of Time to File Brief
April 24, 2007
Per Curiam
Comment: APLNT'S BRIEF DUE 5/23/07.
May 22, 2007
Appellant
Appellee
Appellee's Brief Filed
June 20, 2007
June 21, 2007

Reply Received (Argument) Expedited
June 27, 2007
Appellant
November 30, 2007
Argument Scheduled
Comment: 1/8/08 PANEL A02/08 9AM HBG

December 5, 2007
December 5, 2007
January 9, 2008

Appellee
Appellant

Argued
February 12, 2008
Affirmed
Per Curiam
March 25, 2008
Remitted
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 466
378 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 4 of 4
November 10, 2016
SESSION INFORMATION
Journal Number:
Consideration Type:
J-A02002-08
Oral Argument - Panel
January 8, 2008
Panel Composition:
Judge
Judge
Judge
The Honorable Correale F. Stevens

The Honorable Joan Orie Melvin
The Honorable John T. Bender
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Filed Date:
Yes
J-A02002-08
Decided
Affirmed
Memorandum
2/12/2008 12:00:00AM
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Filing Author:
February 12, 2008

Per Curiam
February 12, 2008
Per Curiam
Filed Date:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
Record Remittal:
March 25, 2008
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 467
379 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 4
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
September 11, 2008
Journal Number:
J-A13001-08
Case Category:
Criminal
Completed
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Summary Offense/Conviction
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
125 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1097 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1103 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1565 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2052 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2053 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
113 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
234 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Yes
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 468
380 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 4
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
No
No
Totaro, Donald R.
50 N Duke St
(717) 299-8100
Fax No:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
(717) 299-8100
Fax No: (717) 295-3693
Phone No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:

50 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17608
(717) 299-8100
Fax No:
Phone No:
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
April 30, 2007
Judicial District:
May 18, 2007
CP-36-SA-0000160-2006
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Judge

02
May 1, 2007
Filed Date
Content Description
Part
Transcripts
Comment: Comments:
August 02, 2007

August 02, 2007
1
1
Date of Remand of Record: September 11, 2008

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellee
Brief
Appellant
Brief
Filed: September 11, 2007
Due: October 11, 2007
Filed: October 18, 2007
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
Filed By
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 469
381 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 4
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
May 18, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Comment: AWAITING PROOF OF SERVICE FROM PRO SE APPELLANT SHOWING SERVICE TO T/C
JUDGE
May 21, 2007

May 30, 2007
Appellant
Other
June 22, 2007

Document Name: RECORD STATUS LETTER
Comment: LETTER STATING THE RECORD IS STILL WITH LOWER COURT JUDGE AND WILL BE SENT AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE.
August 2, 2007

September 11, 2007

Appellant
September 12, 2007

September 20, 2007
Application to Compel
Appellee
Comment: COMPEL APPELLANT TO SERVE APPELLEE WITH A COPY OF HIS BRIEF
September 28, 2007
Reply Received (Argument) Expedited

Appellant
October 18, 2007
Appellee
Comment: TIMELY FILED DUE TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF REC'D LATE
Appellee
Praecipe
for
Appearance
Muzereus,
Deborah
L.
Document Name:
October 18, 2007
November 2, 2007
Order Denying Application to Compel
Per Curiam
Comment: DENIED AS MOOT AS COMMONWEALTH HAS REC'D APPELLANTS BRIEF
February 29, 2008
Argument Scheduled
Comment: PANEL A13/08 4/29/08 HBG 9:30AM

March 13, 2008
March 19, 2008

Appellee
Appellant
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 470
382 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 4 of 4
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
Filed By

Appellee
Document Name: Praecipe for Appearance Gonzalez, Andrew James
April 29, 2008
August 4, 2008
Affirmed
Per Curiam
September 11, 2008
Remitted
September 19, 2008

SESSION INFORMATION
Journal Number:
Consideration Type:
J-A13001-08
April 29, 2008
Panel Composition:
Judge
Judge
Judge

The Honorable Jacqueline O. Shogan
The Honorable Robert E. Colville
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Filed Date:
Yes
J-A13001-08
Decided
Affirmed
Memorandum
8/4/2008 12:00:00AM
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Filing Author:
August 4, 2008
Per Curiam
August 4, 2008
Per Curiam
Filed Date:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
Record Remittal:
September 11, 2008
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 471
383 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
January 22, 2008
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Driving Under the Influence

RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
125 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
855 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1103 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1565 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2052 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2053 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
113 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
234 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Yes
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 472
384 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
No
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Totaro, Donald R.
Lancaster County DA's Office
50 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 299-8100
Fax No:
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
June 4, 2007
Judicial District:
June 27, 2007
Order Dated
K4775120
CP-36-CR-0004771-2006
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Allison, Paul K.
Judge

02
June 15, 2007
Filed Date
Content Description
Part
October 09, 2007
Date of Remand of Record: January 22, 2008

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
June 15, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Comment: AWAITING PROOF OF SERVICE OF APPEAL UPON T/C JUDGE, DA, CRT RECORDER & CRT
ADMIN.
June 28, 2007

July 10, 2007

Appellant
August 8, 2007
Other

Document Name: LETTER RE: RECORD STATUS
Comment: LETTER FROM T/C STATING THAT THE RECORD WILL BE SENT ASAP.
October 9, 2007

NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 473
385 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:21 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
December 14, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Per Curiam
January 22, 2008
Remitted
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Filed Date:
Yes
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Filing Author:
December 14, 2007

Per Curiam
December 14, 2007
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 474
386 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:22 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION

v.
Dr. Emily Pressley, Psychiatric Department and Lancaster General Hospital
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Closed
February 25, 2008
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Civil Action Law

RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
125 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
855 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1097 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1103 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2052 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2053 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
113 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
234 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
No
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 475
387 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:22 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
Dr. Emily Pressley, Psychiatric Department and Lancaster General Hospital
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
No
No
Phone No:
Mattson, Christopher W.
126 E King St
(717) 299-5201
Fax No: (717) 291-4660

FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
09/10/2007
01/14/2008
Notice of Appeal
2nd Motion for Extension of Time
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
60.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
August 10, 2007
Judicial District:
September 13, 2007
Order Entered
CI- 06-03349
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Cullen, James P.
Judge

02
September 10, 2007
Filed Date
Content Description
Part
November 07, 2007
Date of Remand of Record: February 25, 2008

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
September 13, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Comment: AWAITING PROOF OF SERVICE FROM STANLEY CATERBONE SHOWING T/C JUDGE WAS
SERVED WITH NOTICE OF APPEAL
September 14, 2007

September 28, 2007

Appellant
November 7, 2007

NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 476
388 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:22 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
December 14, 2007

Appellant
December 14, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Order Granting Application for Extension of Time to File Brief

Appellant
Per Curiam
Comment: BRIEF DUE ON JANUARY 16, 2008

December 31, 2007

Per Curiam
Comment: WITHIN
10 DAYS,
WHY
THIS
APPEAL
SHOULD
NOT
INTERLOCUTORY.
1/11/08 - REC'D REPLY TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND EXIT TO CRT
January 14, 2008
January 16, 2008
January 17, 2008
BE
DISMISSED
Application for Extension of Time to File Brief - Second Request

Appellant

Appellant
AS
BEING
Order Denying Application for Extension of Time to File Brief

Per Curiam
Comment: DENIED AS MOOT

January 17, 2008
In Forma Pauperis Denied

Per Curiam
Comment: DENIED AS MOOT

January 17, 2008

Per Curiam
February 25, 2008
Remitted
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Filed Date:
Yes
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Filing Author:
January 17, 2008

Per Curiam
January 17, 2008
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 477
389 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:22 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 4
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
December 23, 2008
Journal Number:
J-S57016-08
Case Category:
Criminal
Completed
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
125 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
855 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1097 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1103 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1565 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2053 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
113 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
234 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Yes
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 478
390 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:22 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 4
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
No
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:

50 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17608
(717) 299-8100
Fax No:
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
October 22, 2007
Judicial District:
December 5, 2007
CP-36-SA-0000154-2007
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Senior Judge

02
November 21, 2007
Filed Date
Content Description
Part
Transcripts
December 31, 2007

December 31, 2007
1
1
Date of Remand of Record: December 23, 2008

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellee
Brief
Appellant
Brief
Due: March 12, 2008
Filed: March 12, 2008
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
December 5, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
Comment: AWAITING PROOF OF SERVICE TO T/C JUDGE & COURT REPORTER FROM APPELLANT, PRO
SE
December 6, 2007

December 20, 2007

Appellant
December 31, 2007

NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 479
391 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:22 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 4
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
February 11, 2008
February 12, 2008
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant


Appellee
Document Name: Praecipe for Appearance Gonzalez, Andrew James
March 12, 2008
March 12, 2008

Appellee
March 13, 2008
Submitted on Brief
Comment: AUTO SUBMIT - NO REPLY REC'D

November 10, 2008
Affirmed
Per Curiam
Application for Extension of Time to File

Appellant
Comment: RECONSIDERATION/REARGUMENT
November 25, 2008
December 22, 2008
Order Denying Application for Extension of Time to File

Per Curiam
Comment: RECONSIDERATION/REARGUMENT
December 23, 2008
Remitted
January 7, 2009

SESSION INFORMATION
Journal Number:
Consideration Type:
J-S57016-08
August 18, 2008
Panel Composition:
The Honorable John M. Cleland
The Honorable Patrick R. Tamilia
Judge
Judge
Judge
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
No
J-S57016-08
Decided
Affirmed
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
November 10, 2008

Per Curiam
November 10, 2008
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 480
392 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:22 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 4 of 4
November 10, 2016
Filed Date:
Memorandum
11/10/2008 12:00:00AM
Filing Author:
Per Curiam
Filed Date:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
Record Remittal:
December 23, 2008
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 481
393 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:22 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
May 29, 2008
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
125 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
855 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1097 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1103 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1565 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2052 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
113 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
234 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Yes
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 482
394 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:22 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
No
Totaro, Donald R.
50 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 299-8100
Fax No: (717) 295-3693
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
October 22, 2007
Judicial District:
December 5, 2007
CP-36-SA-0000158-2007
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Senior Judge

02
November 21, 2007
Filed Date
Content Description
Part
Transcript
December 28, 2007

December 28, 2007
1
1
Date of Remand of Record: May 29, 2008

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellee
Brief
Appellant
Brief
Due: March 7, 2008
Filed:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
December 5, 2007
December 6, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant

December 20, 2007

Appellant
December 28, 2007
Other
Comment: **TO BE LISTED CONSECUTIVELY WITH 2052 MDA 2007**

December 28, 2007

NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 483
395 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:22 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
February 7, 2008

Appellant
February 7, 2008
Participant Type
Filed By
Application for Extension of Time to File Brief Granted

Per Curiam
Comment: DUE 3/7/08

April 21, 2008

Per Curiam
May 8, 2008
May 23, 2008

Appellant

Per Curiam
May 29, 2008
Remitted
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Filed Date:
Yes
Memorandum
4/21/2008 12:00:00AM
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Filing Author:
April 21, 2008

Per Curiam
April 21, 2008
Per Curiam
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Court Name:
Short Caption:
Case Status:
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
374 MT 2008
Supreme
Commonwealth v. Caterbone, Pet
Closed
Administrative Closure
June 23, 2008
Case Initiation
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 484
396 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:23 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
December 30, 2008
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
Fleeing/Eluding Police
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
125 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
855 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1097 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1103 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1565 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2052 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2053 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
234 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Yes
Campbell, Paul Gary
PO Box 148
Holtwood, PA 17532-0148
(717) 284-5944
Fax No: (717) 284-5844
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 485
397 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:23 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
No
No
Phone No:
(717) 299-8100
Fax No: (717) 295-3693
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
October 24, 2007
Judicial District:
January 17, 2008
K3913991
CP-36-CR-0003179-2006
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Cullen, James P.
Judge

02
January 14, 2008
Filed Date
Content Description
Part
Transcripts
Supplemental Part
Supplemental Part
Supplemental Transcripts
May 02, 2008

May 02, 2008
July 30, 2008
October 20, 2008
October 20, 2008
1
1
1
1
4
Date of Remand of Record: April 29, 2009

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellee
Brief
Appellant
Brief
Filed:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
January 14, 2008
Participant Type
Appellant
Comment: 12/14/07 - POST SENTENCE MOTION DENIED
January 22, 2008
Filed By

February 26, 2008
Due Date:
Per Curiam
Comment: DUE BY 3/6/08.
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 486
398 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:23 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
March 6, 2008
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
May 2, 2008

Other
May 15, 2008

Comment: REC'D CRSPND FROM CT. APPTD COUNSEL ADVISING HE IS
NO LONGER ON THE CT
APPOINTMENT LIST AND THAT THE T/C WILL BE APPTG NEW CNSL.
5/15/08 - CALLED T/C AS TO STATUS OF CT APPT - NO INFO AVAIL.
7/11/08 - CALLED T/C AS TO STATUS OF CT APPT - NO ATTY APPTD.
7/28/08 - T/C ORDER REC'D RE-APTING PAUL CAMPBELL AS COUNSEL. EXIT NEW B.S. ON
7/29/08
November 19, 2008
Per Curiam
Comment: ATTY SHALL PROVIDE CERTIFICATION W/IN 10 DAYS OF NOTICE TO CLIENT.
Application for Extension of Time to File
Appellant
Comment: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPLICATION FOR REARGUMENT.
November 26, 2008
December 8, 2008
December 30, 2008

Appellant
Order Denying Application for Extension of Time to File

Per Curiam
Comment: AS MOOT
December 30, 2008

Per Curiam
April 29, 2009
Remitted
May 5, 2009

Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
Filed Date:
ATTY SHALL PROVIDE CERTIFICATION W/IN 10 DAYS OF NOTICE TO CLIENT.

Filing Author:

Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
November 19, 2008

Per Curiam
November 19, 2008
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 487
399 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:23 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
In Re: Petition for Review

Appeal of: Stanley Caterbone
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Closed
April 21, 2008
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Other
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
125 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
855 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1097 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1103 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
1565 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2052 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
2053 MDA 2007

Similar Issue(s)
Related
113 MDA 2008

Similar Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Yes
Pending
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 488
400 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:23 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellee
Pro Se:
No
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Weiner, Cummings & Vittoria
Lancaster Co DA's Office
(717) 299-8100
Phone No:
Fax No: (717) 295-3693
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
02/12/2008
Notice of Appeal
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
60.00
0.00
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
December 28, 2007
Judicial District:
February 7, 2008
Order Entered
MD-879-2007
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Farina, Louis J.
Judge

02
January 24, 2008
Filed Date
Content Description

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
January 24, 2008
February 7, 2008
February 7, 2008
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant

Appellant

February 12, 2008
In Forma Pauperis Denied

Per Curiam
Comment: W/O PREJUDICE TO RE-FILE IN THE TRIAL COURT
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 489
401 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:23 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
March 10, 2008
Filed By
Due Date:
Per Curiam
Comment: DOCKETING STMT DUE MARCH 20, 2008

March 19, 2008

Appellant
March 27, 2008

Per Curiam
Comment: APPELLANT TO SHOW CAUSE WITHIN 10 DAYS AS TO WHY THIS APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PAY THE FEES NOTED
April 21, 2008
Dismissed
Per Curiam
April 21, 2008

Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Filed Date:
Yes
Dismissed
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Filing Author:
April 21, 2008

Per Curiam
April 21, 2008
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 490
402 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:24 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 2
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
In Re: Stanley Caterbone

Appeal of: Stanley Caterbone
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
August 5, 2010
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
Mental Health and Retardation Act
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Yes
Yes
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Appellee
Pro Se:
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Mental Health/Mental Retardation
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
Sanders, Angela Holt
Blakinger Byler & Thomas, P.C.
28 Penn Sq
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 509-7283
Fax No: (717) 299-9529
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
April 16, 2010
Judicial District:
May 12, 2010
Order Entered
CD 6 Page 487-A
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Hoberg, Jay J.
Judge

02
May 4, 2010
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 491
403 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:24 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 2
November 10, 2016
Filed Date
Filed @784 MDA 2010
July 01, 2010
Content Description
Date of Remand of Record: August 5, 2010

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
None
None
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
May 12, 2010
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
May 13, 2010

June 14, 2010
Due Date: June 24, 2010

Per Curiam
Comment: Now due 6/24/10

Dismissed Failure to Comply with Pa.R.A.P. 3517
June 28, 2010
Per Curiam
Trial Court Record and Opinion Received
July 1, 2010

Pleas
Comment: Filed @784 MDA 2010. No briefing schedule issued on 783 MDA 2010.
August 5, 2010

Comment: Record is filed at 784 MDA 2010.
Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Filed Date:
Yes
Dismissed Failure to Comply with
Pa.R.A.P. 3517
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Per Curiam
June 28, 2010
Filing Author:
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 492
404 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:24 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
v.
Appellant
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
November 19, 2010
Completed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
Mental Health and Retardation Act
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type:

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
Yes
Yes
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
Appellee
Pro Se:
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
No
No
Sanders, Angela Holt
Blakinger Byler & Thomas, P.C.
Blakinger Byler ET AL
28 Penn Sq
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 509-7283
Fax No:
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):

Lancaster
Division:
April 16, 2010
Judicial District:
May 12, 2010
Order Entered
CD-6 page 487-A

02
May 4, 2010
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 493
405 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:24 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Hoberg, Jay J.
Judge
Filed Date
Content Description
Part
July 01, 2010

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellee
Brief
Appellant
Brief
Due: August 10, 2010
Filed:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
May 12, 2010
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant
May 12, 2010

May 21, 2010
Appellant
Trial Court Record and Opinion Received
July 1, 2010

Pleas
August 24, 2010

Appellee
October 12, 2010
Petition to Quash Appeal Granted

Per Curiam
Comment: The motion of appellee to dismiss, quash, or transfer this appeal is hereby GRANTED as follows:
The above-captioned appeal is DISMISSED.
November 19, 2010
Remitted
November 24, 2010

Final Disposition:
Related Journal No:
Category:
Disposition:
Yes
The motion of appellee to dismiss, quash, or transfer this appeal is hereby GRANTED as follows:

Petition to Quash Appeal Granted
Judgment Date:
Disposition Author:
Disposition Date:
Per Curiam
October 12, 2010
The above-captioned appeal is DISMISSED.

NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 494
406 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:24 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
Filed Date:
Filing Author:
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
any
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
Page 495
407 of
499
811
Sunday
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Allocatur Docket Sheet

Docket Number: 248 MAL 2007
Page 1 of 4
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Fulton Bank, Respondent

v.
Stanley J. Caterbone, Petitioner
CASE INFORMATION
Petition for Allowance of Appeal
Case Status:
Closed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Mortgage Foreclosure
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
71 MT 2007
Related
Same Record Below
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Pro Se:
Address:
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Yes
Yes
Caterbone, Stanley J., Petitioner
Yes
Pa.R.A.P. 551
Receive Mail:
Receive EMail:
Pro Se:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Email:
Long, Shawn Michael
Attorney:

126 E King St
(717) 399-1512
Fulton Bank, Respondent
No
Address:
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
SUPREME COURT INFORMATION
Appeal From:
Appeal Filed Below:
Probable Jurisdiction Noted:
Docketed Date:
Allocatur/Miscellaneous Granted:
Allocatur/Miscellaneous Docket No.:
March 22, 2007
Allocatur/Miscellaneous Grant Order:

FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes
any liability
LOCAL, STATE, & FEDERALNeither
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
408 of 811
496
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 2 of 4
November 10, 2016
INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT INFORMATION
Court Name:
Date of Order:
Superior
January 4, 2007
Judge(s):
Intermediate Appellate Court Action:
Referring Court:
Docket Number:
Rearg/Recon Disp Date:
Rearg/Recon Disposition:
1463 MDA 2006
Dismissed
Court Below:
County:
Lancaster
Division: Lancaster County Civil Division
Date of Agency/Trial Court Order:
June 29, 2006
Order Type:
OTN(s):
CI-06-02271
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Judge
Filed Date
Content/Description
Record Remittal:
Filed Date:
Disposition:
Reargument Order:
July 20, 2007

Order Denying Application for
Date:
August 31, 2007
Reconsideration
AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2007, the Application for Reconsideration is hereby
DENIED.
Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Record Remittal:
Related Journal No:
Judgment Date:
July 6, 2007
Category:
Decided
Disposition Author:
Per Curiam
Disposition:
Order Denying Petition for

Allowance of Appeal
Disposition Date:
July 6, 2007
Author:
Filed Date:
DOCKET ENTRY
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
409 of 811
497
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 3 of 4
November 10, 2016
Filed Date
February 5, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Petitioner
Comments:
See 71 MT 2007 - filing date of 2/5/2007 (3817) preserved.
3-2-07 - Proof of service (1st class mail)
March 2, 2007
Motion for Recusal of the Honorable J. Michael Eakin

Petitioner
Comments:
3-2-07 - Proof of service (1st class mail)
March 2, 2007
March 6, 2007
Verified Statement in Support of Continuation of IFP Status

Petitioner
IFP Continued
Bizzoso, Irene M.
March 19, 2007
No Brief in Opposition Letter to Motion for Recusal of the Honorable J. Michael Eakin
Filed
Respondent
Fulton Bank
March 19, 2007
Brief in Opposition Filed
Respondent
March 22, 2007
Fulton Bank
Case transferred from 71 MT 2007
Office of the Prothonotary

Comments:
Pleading perfected
July 6, 2007
Order Granting Motion for Recusal of the Honorable J. Michael Eakin

Eakin, J. Michael
Comments:
AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2007, petitioner's Motion for Recusal of the Honorable J. Michael Eakin is hereby
GRANTED.
July 6, 2007
Per Curiam
Comments:
AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.
July 6, 2007
Order Exited

July 20, 2007
Application for Reconsideration
Petitioner
Comments:
Proof of Service dated 7/20/2007 (1st class mail)
August 31, 2007
Per Curiam
Comments:
AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2007, the Application for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED.
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
410 of 811
498
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 4 of 4
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
August 31, 2007
Order Exited
Participant Type
Filed By
August 31, 2007
Notice of Disposition Sheet Exited

CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Docket Number:
1463 MDA 2006

71 MT 2007
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
411 of 811
499
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Miscellaneous Docket Sheet

Docket Number: 152 MM 2007
Page 1 of 4
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Stanley J. Caterbone, Advanced Media Group, Petitioner

v.
Mr. Donald Totaro, Lancaster County District Attorney; Mr. Thomas Corbett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania; The
Lancaster County Commissioners; The Lancaster County Assistance Office; The Pennsylvania Department of Public
Welfare; Fulton Bank; Sheriff's Office of Lancaster County Pennsylvania; The Honorable Judge Dennis Reinaker; The
Honorable Judge James P. Cullen; The Honorable President Louis Farina; Magisterial District Justice Leo H. Eckert, Jr;
Magisterial District Judge Mary Commins; Officer Adam Cramer, of the Southern Regional Police Department; Gail
Parenteau, of Bongiovi Acoustics; Mr. Edward Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania, Respondents
CASE INFORMATION
Petition for Review
Case Status:
Closed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Civil Action Law

RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
153 MM 2007
Related
Same Record Below
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Pro Se:
Address:
Receive Mail:
Receive EMail:
Pro Se:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Yes
Yes
Yes
Pa.R.A.P. 553
Email:
Moyer, Susan E.
50 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 299-8100
Totaro, Donald, Respondent
No
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
412 of 811
500
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 2 of 4
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Attorney:
Totaro, Donald R.
Address:

50 N Duke St
(717) 299-8100
Totaro, Donald, Respondent
No
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Appeal From:
Appeal Filed Below:
Docketed Date:
October 3, 2007

FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
Court Name:
Date of Order:
Superior
July 17, 2007
Docket Number:
Per Curiam
Judge(s):
Referring Court:
950 MDA 2007
No relief sought from judgment of non pros, appeal Dismissed.
Court Below:
County:
Lancaster
May 11, 2007
Order Type:
OTN(s):
CI-07-00366
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Allison, Paul K.
Judge
Filed Date
Content/Description
Record Remittal:
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
413 of 811
501
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 3 of 4
November 10, 2016
Related Journal No:
Judgment Date:
November 8, 2007
Category:
Decided
Disposition Author:
Per Curiam
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
November 8, 2007
Author:
Filed Date:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
August 15, 2007
Petition for Review
Participant Type
Filed By
Petitioner
Comments:
Proof of Service dated 8/14/2007 (method of service - incomplete)
Amended Proof of Service dated 9/5/2007 (Personal)
9/20/2007 - Notice of non-service by D.A. Office. Requested re-serve & amended POS.
9/26/2007 - Corrections rec'd. response accepted as timely filed.
September 6, 2007
September 17, 2007

Petitioner
Order Regarding Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Johns, Charles W.
September 17, 2007
Order Exited

September 25, 2007
No Brief in Opposition Letter Filed
Respondent
October 2, 2007
October 2, 2007
Application to File No Brief in Opposition Nunc Pro Tunc

Respondent
Totaro, Donald
Totaro, Donald
In Forma Pauperis Granted
Johns, Charles W.
October 2, 2007
Order Exited

October 3, 2007
Case was transferred from 432 MT 2007

Comments:
Pleading Perfected.
October 4, 2007
Ancillary Motion Dismissed as Moot
Johns, Charles W.
Comments:
AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2007, the Petition to File Letter Nunc Pro Tunc is dismissed as moot.
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
414 of 811
502
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 4 of 4
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
October 4, 2007
Order Exited
Participant Type
Filed By
November 8, 2007
Per Curiam
Comments:
AND NOW, this 8th day of November, 2007, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal, being treated as Petitions ofr Review,
are denied.
November 8, 2007
Order Exited

November 28, 2007
Reconsideration Time Expired/Case Closed

Comments:
Notice of Disposition Sheet, exit to CCP Lancaster Cty & Superior Ct M.D.
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Docket Number:
432 MT 2007
950 MDA 2007
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
415 of 811
503
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 1 of 4
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Advanced Media Group, Petitioners
v.
Mr. Donald Totaro, Lancaster County District Attorney; Mr. Thomas Corbett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania; The
Lancaster County Commissioners; The Lancaster County Assistance Office; The Pennsylvania Department of Public
Welfare; Fulton Bank; Sheriff's Office of Lancaster County Pennsylvania; The Honorable Judge Dennis Reinaker; The
Honorable Judge James P. Cullen; The Honorable President Louis Farina; Magisterial District Justice Leo H. Eckert, Jr;
Magisterial District Judge Mary Commins; Officer Adam Cramer, of the Southern Regional Police Department; Gail
Parenteau, of Bongiovi Acoustics; Mr. Edward Rendell, Governor of Pennsylvania, Respondents
CASE INFORMATION
Petition for Review
Case Status:
Closed
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Civil Action Law

RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
152 MM 2007
Related
Same Record Below
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Pro Se:
Address:
Receive Mail:
Receive EMail:
Pro Se:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Yes
Yes
Yes
Pa.R.A.P. 553
Email:
Attorney:
Totaro, Donald R.
Address:

PO Box 83480
(717) 299-8100
Totaro et al, Donald R., Respondent
No
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
416 of 811
504
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 2 of 4
November 10, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Munion, Christine Elizabeth
Attorney:
William J. Ferren & Associates

100 W Elm St Ste 200
Conshohocken, PA 19428
(610) 397-4620
Totaro et al, Donald R., Respondent
No
Address:
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Appeal From:
Appeal Filed Below:
Docketed Date:
October 3, 2007

FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
Court Name:
Date of Order:
Superior
July 17, 2007
Docket Number:
Per Curiam
Judge(s):
Referring Court:
951 MDA 2007
Quashed as untimely filed
Court Below:
County:
Lancaster
February 21, 2007
Order Type:
OTN(s):
CI-07-00366
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Allison, Paul K.
Judge
Filed Date
Content/Description
Record Remittal:
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
417 of 811
505
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 3 of 4
November 10, 2016
Related Journal No:
Judgment Date:
November 8, 2007
Category:
Decided
Disposition Author:
Per Curiam
Disposition:
Disposition Date:
November 8, 2007
Author:
Filed Date:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
August 15, 2007
Petition for Review
Participant Type
Filed By
Petitioner
Comments:
Proof of Service dated 8/14/2007 (method of service - incomplete)
Amended Proof of Service dated 9/5/2007 (Personal)
9/20/2007 - Notice of non-servide by D.A. Office. Requested re-serve & amended POS.
9/26/2007 - Corrections rec'd. response accepted as timely filed.
September 6, 2007
September 17, 2007

Petitioner
Order Regarding Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Johns, Charles W.
September 17, 2007
Order Exited

September 27, 2007
No Brief in Opposition Letter Filed
Respondent
October 2, 2007
October 2, 2007
Application to File No Brief in Opposition Nunc Pro Tunc

Respondent

In Forma Pauperis Granted
Johns, Charles W.
October 2, 2007
Order Exited
Johns, Charles W.
October 3, 2007

October 4, 2007
Ancillary Motion Dismissed as Moot
Johns, Charles W.
Comments:
AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2007, the Petition to File Letter Nunc Pro Tunc is dismissed as moot.
October 4, 2007
Order Exited
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
418 of 811
506
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:25 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 4 of 4
November 10, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
November 8, 2007
Participant Type
Filed By
Per Curiam
Comments:
AND NOW, this 8th day of November, 2007, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal, being treated as Petitions for Review,
are denied.
November 8, 2007
Order Exited

November 28, 2007
Reconsideration Time Expired/Case Closed

Comments:
Notice of Disposition Sheet, exit to CCP Lancaster Cty & Superior Ct M.D.
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Docket Number:
433 MT 2007
951 MDA 2007
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
419 of 811
507
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:26 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Stanley J. Caterbone, Petitioner

v.
Residents of the County of Lancaster Pennsylvania, Respondent
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Decided/Active
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Civil Action Law

RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
496 MAL 2016

Related
Similar Issues
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Pro Se:
Address:
Receive Mail:
Receive EMail:
Pro Se:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Yes
Yes
Yes
Denied
Email: scaterbone@live.com
Attorney:
Address:

50 N. Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 299-8100
No
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:

50 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17608
(717) 299-8100
No
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
420 of 811
508
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:26 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
Appeal From:
Appeal Filed Below:
Docketed Date:
July 25, 2016

FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
06/07/2016
Petition for Allowance of Appeal Filed

Reason Waived: Collected on Temp Docket
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
85.50
Court Name:
Date of Order:
Superior
May 10, 2016
Judge(s):
Bowes, Mary Jane

Platt, William

Referring Court:
Docket Number:
1561 MDA 2015
Dismissed
Court Below:
County:
Lancaster

Order Type:
August 20, 2015
Order
OTN(s):
CI-15-06985
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Wright, Jeffery D.
Judge
Filed Date
Content/Description
Record Remittal:
Related Journal No:
Judgment Date:
Category:
Decided
Disposition Author:
Per Curiam
Disposition:

Allowance of Appeal
Disposition Date:
October 25, 2016
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
421 of 811
509
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:26 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
Author:
Filed Date:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
June 7, 2016
June 7, 2016
June 13, 2016
Participant Type
Filed By
Petitioner

Petitioner
Dreibelbis, Amy
Comments:
AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2016, Petitioner's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby
denied.
June 20, 2016
July 25, 2016
No Answer Letter to Petition for Allowance of Appeal

Respondent
Residents of the County of

Lancaster Pennsylvania

Comments:
Pleadings Perfected
October 3, 2016
October 25, 2016
"Motion for a 30-Day Coninuance" received and returned unfiled

Petitioner
Per Curiam
Comments:
AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
October 25, 2016
Order Exited

CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Docket Number:
1561 MDA 2015

353 MT 2016
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
422 of 811
510
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:26 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 1 of 3
November 10, 2016
CAPTION
Stanley J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group

v.
Lancaster City Police, et. al.
Petition of: Stanley J. Caterbone
CASE INFORMATION
Case Status:
Decided/Active
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Civil
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Civil Action Law

RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
495 MAL 2016

Related
Similar Issues
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Pro Se:
Address:
Receive Mail:
Receive EMail:
Pro Se:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Yes
Yes
Yes
Denied
Email: scaterbone@live.com

50 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 299-8100
Lancaster City Police, et al, Respondent
No

50 N Duke St
Lancaster, PA 17608
(717) 299-8100
Lancaster City Police, et al, Respondent
No
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
423 of 811
511
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:26 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 2 of 3
November 10, 2016
Appeal From:
Appeal Filed Below:
Docketed Date:
July 25, 2016

FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
06/07/2016
Petition for Allowance of Appeal Filed

Receipt No
Receipt Amt
85.50
Court Name:
Date of Order:
Superior
May 11, 2016
Judge(s):
Bowes, Mary Jane

Platt, William

Referring Court:
Docket Number:
1915 MDA 2015
Quashed
Court Below:
County:
Lancaster

Order Type:

September 29, 2015
Order
OTN(s):
CP-36-MD-0001108-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Reinaker, Dennis E.
President Judge
Filed Date
Content/Description
Record Remittal:
Related Journal No:
Judgment Date:
Category:
Decided
Disposition Author:
Per Curiam
Disposition:

Allowance of Appeal
Disposition Date:
October 25, 2016
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
424 of 811
512
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016
10:26 A.M.

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

Page 3 of 3
November 10, 2016
Author:
Filed Date:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
June 7, 2016
June 7, 2016
June 13, 2016
Participant Type
Filed By
Petitioner

Petitioner
Dreibelbis, Amy
Comments:
AND NOW, this 13th day of June, 2016, Petitioner's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby
denied.
July 25, 2016

Comments:
Pleadings Perfected
October 3, 2016
October 25, 2016
"Motion for 30-Day Continuance" received and returned unfiled

Petitioner
Per Curiam
Comments:
AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
October 25, 2016
Order Exited

CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Docket Number:
1915 MDA 2015

354 MT 2016
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKDETSPage
DOCKETS
425 of 811
513
499
Thursday
Sunday
November 13,
10, 2016

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
CHAPTER
DIVIDER

DOCKDETSPage
Page 514
426 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
Case: 15-3400
!
$
"
"
Document: 003112143900
Page:
2 Stan
DateMedia
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
J.Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
#
#
( )*
% &
" #
"
'
$
+
(*
( (
+0
&
.)
(
1
( ).
'
'
'
. ./*0 2
,
+
+ (
+
+
- ./*0
,
+% *"
.
3 - 45* **0 67
+
" (
))
/)
.
+
"
)
* *+
'
#
)
"
8 * .//6
1
( " )(
' $$ !
% &
' $$ !
-* .//4
2
4
. 3
2
$1
0 2#
0
37-7 -.6 0/
1
37 .90 77- .7
5 "

DOCKDETSPage
Page 515
427 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
3 Stan
DateMedia
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
J.Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
)*
!
$
&
'$
+,
" #
$ ( )
## ""
- (
*#+* +#**"
*#+* +#**"
,&
'$&
,
.
$
. /
./
%%
#**"
# *
#*#
#*#
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*#
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*#
# # "#
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
23
2)
*4+* +#**"
*4+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
4*
0 4 "4"
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
4*
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
4*
0 *
*"+* +#**"
*"+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
4*
*+* +#**"
+* +#**"
*+* +#**"
+* +#**"
,&
,&
,$ $
,$ $
&
&
1
1
0
0
4*
4*
0
0
#+* +#**"
#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
4*
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
4*
#4
*#+* +#* *
*#+* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
4*
*#
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
4*
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
4*
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
4*
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,&
,$ $
&
&
04"
0#
'0
"
04"
**
0 *
*#
#
4
##
""
4* *
**
,/1
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page516
2 ofof119
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
428
499
811
55 6
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
4 Stan
DateMedia
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
J.Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
&
!
"
#
$
&'
(
$
$
*
$
& $
3 5
1
&
4*#
- (
. /
*#+* +#**"
*#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
#*
"
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
"
*4+* +#**"
*4+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
*"+* +#**"
*"+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
*+* +#**"
*+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
+* +#**"
+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
#+* +#**"
#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
**
4*
"
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
**
"
*#+* +#* *
*#+* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
**
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
**
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
**
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
**
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,&
,$ $
&
'0
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
4*
,/1
2
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page517
3 ofof119
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
429
499
811
6'
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
5 Stan
DateMedia
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
J.Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
'
!
"
#
$
&'
(
* / 1 !//
6
7 "
8
%-
&
9%:
1
"
"" "
/3 *##
/6 4
2 ;&
/6 4 4<" 2 ;&
*#+* +#**"
*#+* +#**"
* +* +#**"
$ :
" " 4
, 7:
"# "
:/ =
%-
( .
3 %
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
"
"
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*4+ +#**"
*4+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
"
*"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 4
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 4 #4"
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 4
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 4
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 44
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 4
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,&
,$ $
&
0 4 # * **
0# * ""
'0
$
#
"
#
#
"
4
"
""" *
"
*
"4
*"
"
,/1
2
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page518
4 ofof119
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
430
499
811
&767&
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
6 Stan
DateMedia
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
J.Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
8
28
###
$
& %
&' *
* 4
*#+* +#**"
*#+* +#**"
* +* +#**"
$(
%
4*
&
&
( .
.&
3 %
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
0 #"
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
0 #"
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
0 **
*4+ +#**"
*4+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
0 * #
#4
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
0 * "
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
0 * 4#
*"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
#4"
0 #" #
*#
# 4"
*+ +#**"
*+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
*#
+ +#**"
+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
4 #
#+ +#**"
#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
" #
* + +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
0 ##
*#+ +#* *
*#+* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
0 #
* + +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
0 #
* + +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
*#
* + +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
#4"
#"
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
'0
4*
,/1
2
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page519
5 ofof119
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
431
499
811
45
&
6&&
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
7 Stan
DateMedia
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
J.Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
*!+,
>
?
$.
$ %
!
'$
$$ >
%
4*
- (
. /
*#+* +#**"
*#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
##
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
"
"
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 " *44
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 "#
*4+ +#**"
*4+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 "
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 "
**
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 "
*"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 " "##
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 #* *"
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 #* #4
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 #*
"#
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 #* 4*
*"
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 #*
#4
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 #* " "
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0#
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 #" #
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,&
,$ $
&
'0
**
"*
#* 4*
4*
*
,/1
2
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page520
6 ofof119
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
432
499
811
4 7
6'
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
8 Stan
DateMedia
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
J.Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
5
!
"
#
$
&'
(
# /
6$
$
*!// 2
.
$%
$$
%
#!
! /
@
4*#
+
,
(# /
%
6
9 &9
- (
6
!
9 '9
&
. /
*#+* +#**"
*#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 # "#
"
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
4 #
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*4+* +#**"
*4+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 44
*"+* +#**"
*"+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*+* +#**"
*+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
"
+* +#**"
+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
" *
#+* +#**"
#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 "4
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 "*
*#+* +#* *
*#+* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0"
*#
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0" "
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 "# 4 4
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,&
,$ $
&
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page521
7 ofof119
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
433
499
811
4*
0 #
* *#
*
"#
*
#
#
#
# "
76&
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
9 Stan
DateMedia
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced
J.Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
5
!
"
#
$
&'
(
)-
1
*
$
*!// 2
!((:
3 5
%
4*#
+
!((
,
%
6
9 &9
- (
6
!
9 '9
&
. /
*#+* +#**"
*#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 # "#
"
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
4 #
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*4+* +#**"
*4+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 44
*"+* +#**"
*"+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*+* +#**"
*+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
"
+* +#**"
+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
" *
#+* +#**"
#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 "4
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 "*
*#+* +#* *
*#+* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0"
*#
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0" "
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 "# 4 4
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0"
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,&
,$ $
&
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page522
8 ofof119
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
434
499
811
4*
0 #
* *#
*
"#
*
#
#
#
# "
76&
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 10
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
5
!
"
#
$
&'
(
A$
$1 %@
. / 1
1
$$
#4
% B $1
$ %
4*#
*!// 2
+
,
%
6
9 &9
- (
6
!
9 '9
&
. /
*#+* +#**"
*#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 # "#
"
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
4 #
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*4+* +#**"
*4+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 44
*"+* +#**"
*"+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*+* +#**"
*+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
+* +#**"
+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
#+* +#**"
#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 "4
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 "*
*#+* +#* *
*#+* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0"
*#
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0" "
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 "# 4 4
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,&
,$ $
&
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page523
9 ofof119
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
435
499
811
4*
0 #
* *#
*
"#
*
#
#
"
" *
#
#
# "
76&
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 11
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
6 6$
+
$
$ '$%
6 1 $ 5
/
$
1
&
) $
4#4 &
3 -
) %
- (
. /
*#+* +#**"
*#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
*4+* +#**"
*4+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
,&
* +* +#**"
* +* +#**"
*"+* +#**"
0 #
"#
0 #
0 #
4#
0 #
"" "
&
0 #
,$ $
&
0 #
#4
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
4 *#
*"+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
*+* +#**"
*+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
*4
+* +#**"
+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
# *
#+* +#**"
#+* +#**"
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
"
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
*#+* +#* *
*#+* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 #
"#
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 #4
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
,&
,$ $
&
0 #4
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,&
,$ $
&
* #
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page524
10 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
436
of119
499
811
4 4 "#
'5'6
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 12
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
7
!
"
#
$
&'
(
%(
6
3 5
%-
1$
!/
- (
77
!
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
'$-
*4+ +#**"
*4+ +#**"
,$ $
&
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
*"+ +#**"
. /
0
*** **
44
&
44
,$ $
&
44
**
*"+ +#**"
,$ $
&
44
44 4
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,$ $
&
44
44 4
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,$ $
&
44
** *#
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
,$ $
&
44
4 4"
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
44
"
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
&
44
* **
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
44
44
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
44
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
44
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
'3 '
,2
EF
.2
,$ $
) $%
/$ & $
6 % $ $1
$%
. C A$ D & $
%
7
$ )
""
,
"" ,
7)
%
1
$
7
%
&
0 #
*** **
44
#
#
** *
#
G
2
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page525
11 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
437
of119
499
811
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 13
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
8 * //
4 *
% / $
A8
$
- (
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
'$-
'$3%
$
$ $ 8
%%
$
.
)) 7 4:** .
.
$
>?
CH+
A%
: *
)) 7
$
)) 7
*
$
%
7
$
$
% %
/ $
$1 .
(
$1 C
$ % 7
$
)
. $1 . $1
J
$
$ A
) .
A$
.
. $1 $ )
$ 9%
$ A
$
$ )
$
$@
)
$%
)) 7
*
* )
A
$
4 ) % $% A
$
. . %
.
$
' A % $ A
)
$ $
A
$1
$
A 7
$ $1
$ %
$
5$ A .
1 % A
)
$
$
% ; (
$ A 5
$ .
% - % %
$1 .
%
$ $
A
%% $1
$1 ,
- %
. /
% $ $1 '$-
3 $
1
:**
0 # 4** **
./
#**"
$
& .
.
% $1
$
)
$
$
; (
)
$
.
$
7
$
$ $
A 8
$
3 $ % A
$ .
% . %
)
$ 9%
$
%
1
I.
A$
. $1
$ 7) $
A $
. $1
3 $ % 1
$ A
) 1$ % % $
$
%
A
.
%
$ C
3 $
..
5 .
$
..
) A
$
$
44
.
C
..
)
$
A
)) 7
#:
A $
.
% ))
7) $
A % $ $.
$ $
$
$ $ . $ $.
$
% %% C
)
$
- $ .
A
)
.
$
% .. C
.
.
C
A
$ $ # .
%
/ !
&
C
$
'$%
$
5
%
#**"
* + +#* *
*#+ +#* *
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
*"+* +#*
,$
,$
,$
,$
,$
,$
$
$
$
$
$
$
&
&
&
&
&
&
**
8
% . & $%
$1 C
0
**
8
. C
> %
$
%
3 $
&
?
$% ? % $
# 8 3 1%
8
%%
$K
$ $
.. $1
* + +#* *
*#+ +#* *
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
*"+* +#*
#4
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page526
12 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
438
of119
499
811
0 4 **
0 # **
0# *** **
& ,6(> (3
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
04** **
#
#
#
#
#
*
#
#
#
#
#
"
0#
0
0
0
0
0
0
# "# 4
#
#
4 #*
#
*#
#
"
"
4
6'
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 14
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
! /
!
5
*" 6
8
$ %
! 1
! !
$
4*
"
- (
* + +#**"
*4+ +#**"
* + +#**"
'$-
3%
3
#/ $
!
+
%
. /
'
#**
0
$%,
/
** )
#**"
$
0
* * **
* * **
4# #
*4+ +#**"
,$ $
/ $
&
1
3%
0
0
#"# #
**
* + +#**"
,$ $
/ $
&
1
3%
0
0
#"# #
**
0 4
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
/ $
&
1
3%
0
0
#"# #
**
0
0
* +#*+#**"
* +#*+#**"
*"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,$ $
&
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,$ $
&
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,$ $
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
* + +#* *
0 4
"
* + +#**"
0
"
0#
4 4
4* **
0 4 ""
* **
0 4 ""
4*
&
4*
,$ $
&
4*
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
4*
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
&
4*
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
4*
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
4*
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
4*
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,$ $
&
0 4
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page527
13 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
439
of119
499
811
4*
0#
"
4
44"
" #"
#
**
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 15
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
%
1/
4
8
3
D '$
/ 1
%
!
$1
%
%
- (
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
'$-
. /
$ % .
$$% - $
$ . %.
!
"
0 ** **
> 5
2$
3
$ &
"
0#
'$
'$-
*L
$$
$ % .
$$% - $
$ . %.
/
""
0 ** **
> 5
'$
*L
2$
)
1 %
) $%
4** **
0
#** **
$ &
"""
) $%
0 4 *** **
0#
$$
C6C
** **
0 #" 4** **
*4+ +#**"
*4+ +#**"
,$ $
&
* * **
* 4 * **
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
* * **
4* **
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
* * **
*"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,$ $
&
* * **
"#* **
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,$ $
&
* * **
*** **
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,$ $
&
* * **
4 * * **
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
,$ $
&
* * **
4* **
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
* * **
# * **
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
&
* * **
" #* **
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
* * **
* ** **
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
* * **
* **
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
* * **
# 4* **
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,$ $
&
0#
4*
* *#*
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page528
14 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
440
of119
499
811
* **
4 Sunday
&
6 November
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 16
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
5
!
"
#
$
&'
(
,
- +!
#
/ $
& $ % 1
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
/ % /!
4
- (
'$-
$& %
.
*# '$
$
. /
)
>$ A ( )
*# '$
$
C A $1 D
*# '$
$
#**4
$1
#**4
#**4
/
'$
! $
#**"
**
$1
0
**
$1
0 # * **
4
65
0
**
*
*
*4+ +#**"
*4+ +#**"
,$ $
&
* **
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
*"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,$ $
&
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,$ $
&
* *
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,$ $
&
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
,$ $
&
* *
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
&
"** #
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"#" "*
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,$ $
&
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page529
15 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
441
of119
499
811
"
"4 #
*
#
"
0#4 *
'& 6 5
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 17
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
$
/ 1
* 4
$ %
! ! +
* + +#**"
1$
4*
- (
*4+ +#**"
&
'$-
'$-
. /
'$ -
C
C
%
7
$ $1
:
$ I'C J
0
*** **
*** **
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
44
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
44
*"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,$ $
&
44
**
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,$ $
&
44
44 4"
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,$ $
&
44
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
,$ $
&
44
** *#
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
44
4 4"
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
&
44
"
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
44
* **
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
44
44
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
44
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,$ $
&
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page530
16 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
442
of119
499
811
** 4"
44
#
0 #* "
*4
7 56 '
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 18
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
'
!
"
#
$
&'
(
#
**
%
1/
% /! 1
!
/ !
,
)
#*#*
9% &'9
***
- (
*4+ +#**"
*4+ +#**"
79 '79' 55
!
'$-
/(
. /
#
L .0
*** ** & $ $ % & 1
,
8 $ &
%
& $
% $
$
,
A% 0
444 4
7
%
0
444 4
0
444 4
+ +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
"
+ +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
"
"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
"
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
0 #*
"
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
0 #
# #
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 #
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 #
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 #
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 #4
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 #
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,$ $
&
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page531
17 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
443
of119
499
811
* 4*
"*
"
4 #*
4
& 5 '6
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 19
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
&
!
"
#
$
&'
(
, $
"> % &
$ %
(
% /! 1
( % /!
%$
4*
#!/
6
/ !
6 79 '79' 55
9% &'9 7
- (
. /
*4+ +#**"
*4+ +#**"
'$-
+ +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
"
+ +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
"
"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
0 # **"
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
0 # *
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
0 # #*
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
0 # *#
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 # **
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 # "
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 # "
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 # 4"
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 # "*
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
A,
,$ $
/(
L .0
#
*** ** & $ $ % & 1
,
8 $ &
%
& $
% $
$
,
A% 0
444 4
7
%
0
444 4
0
444 4
$ 3
&
'
*# $ !
" #*
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page532
18 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
444
of119
499
811
4** **
""
"
"
"
#
"
"*
655
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 20
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
%
1/
!
. & $%
#*"
8
%
(
% /! 1
(
-
A
1
@
#*
/ !
#!/
6
6 79 '79' 55
9% &'9 7
- (
. /
*4+ +#**"
*4+ +#**"
'$-
/(
L .0
#
*** ** & $ $ % & 1
,
8 $ &
%
& $
% $
$
,
A% 0
444 4
7
%
0
444 4
0
444 4
+ +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
"
+ +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
"
"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
"
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
0 #*
"
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
0 #
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
,$ $
&
"
0 ## **
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 #
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 #
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 #
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 #4
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
0 #
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,$ $
&
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page533
19 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
445
of119
499
811
* 4*
"*
"
4 #*
4
& 5 '6'
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 21
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
$
1
$$% - $ 3 )
#/ $
- $
$ %
4*
!
$
2((!
.> .
- (
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
'$-
. /
,
)
$ . %A
(
( % C $%
6
#**4
/
#/ $ %
0
** )
1
& % %
0# **
))
,
%
#**
/ $
0
%%
"#* **
0 * *** **
"#* **
*4+ +#**"
*4+ +#**"
,$ $
&
#4
0 4* #4
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
#4
0 4
* + +#**"
* + +#**"
,$ $
&
#4
0 4
*"+ +#**"
*"+ +#**"
,$ $
&
#4
0 4
*4
*+ +#**"
*+ +#**"
,$ $
&
#4
0 4
+ +#**"
+ +#**"
,$ $
&
#4
0 4
4 *#
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
,$ $
&
#4
0 4
4"
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
#4
0 4"
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
&
#4
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
#4
# 4 *
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
#4
"
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
#4
#*
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,$ $
&
0 4
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page534
20 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
446
of119
499
811
""
0#
4
*
556
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 22
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
1
% $( 1 $
6
7 #**4
/
$ %
1
I
J4"
#
! "
6..
*
$%&
- (
#+ +#**"
#+ +#**"
'$-
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
. /
0 ** **
0 ** **
0 *
&
44
,$ $
&
"
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
0 #
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
0 #"
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
,$ $
% $
&
0 #
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page535
21 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
447
of119
499
811
"
**
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 23
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
3 !
,
1
(
,! +
(
%
+
9
- (
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
# M
$
.
.2
. /
% .
. $A $1 7)
2
) $%
/$ & $
- )
$ $
)
$
/
A ) $% $ % %
%
0 ** *** ** )
0#
** *** **
:
,
> %
$ C 1
'$ -
.2
#**" >
) $%
/$
& $
7
))
/
$1 3
#
' &D
5%
$ / %%
&'
% .
&
#**"
+#
4 4+
% )
B
+
):++AAA %
) $%
/$
%% $
#**"
3 )
5 % $ / %%
. 3 . $%
>
%%
+#
44
#+' &
" 4 &
$! &
%
'$- % 1
$% E 'C
1
D
# #**" 2%
% 7
$8
$ (1
$ N
F % $1:
):++AAA %
+
. 3 . $% (
):++AAA %
B
%%
+
& $
(
%&
$ 2
) $
+# "**4#4+& ' C
$ &
$ 6
) $%
2
&
/$ & $
$ . 8
'$- % 1
$%
# #**"
$ (1
'C
*#+ +#* *
*#+ +#* *
,$ $
&
"
44 44
0#
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
44 44
0#
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
44 44
0#
* + +#* *
* + +#* *
,$ $
&
"
44 44
0#
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
"
0 #4
,$ $
&
,
. % %$
$
$
% ) $
%
$
1 %
&
$
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page536
22 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
448
of119
499
811
$ A .
'
** * " 44
*4
"" "
4 444
4# **
' 6
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 24
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
%
1/
!
(
$!
%626 . > ' '7

*
!
+ %
-
$!
;
"
6
6
'(
7 &
5
)
&
* +* +#* *
* +* +#* *
*"+* +#*
*"+* +#*
2 =
&
'
%) $% $
$$% - $ 3
.
. 6$
- % $ $ 6
))
.C
&
)
&
/
%
%
#3 %,
,
.
* +* +#* *
<%
'9 '7
- (
*#+ 4+#* *
! +
3
,$ $
. /
$ ( $# 0 ** **
3
- %
- 1 %
M
3
C
%
$ .
& %
" *4
.
$$% - $
$
$ $ , %
%
4
/
04 *** **
0 ** **
&
4'6
* **
0 *
#
3 Recievables
$COURT
% , (DOCKETS
- A E 6 Page
6('?'
' F6'& 6
Advanced
Media Group
Page
23 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
DOCKDETSPage
449
537
of119
499
811
MP
6
6
0 #"
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 25
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
"
#
$
&'
(
! 1 ($
!
*
! +
,
)
! 1- ,
% +
!+,
/!
- (
6$ /
1
)
C
$
" #*
% $%
$% -
$
I0#
$
$
.
$ /
%
- A)
$ C
$
$
$
A %
$&
$
- A
A
%) $
%) $ %
#
.
%
$&
$1
)
@
*4+##+#*
$
% $%
5
.
/ 5
)
# * ,
'$%)
A
))
$ &
)
1
!
!
-%
&
.
$1
8
&
))
3 !
A
.
$
$ $
. /
))
%
)) -
$ .
$ &
)
%%
&
(
A
&
$
& $
% ))
$ .
& $
** %
.
$ A
.K A
% $
$
. ) J
.
C
&
$
)
))
$ $
- $
6.
$%.
$1
3
%
. M $
&
$
6$ /
" #*
3
$
C
%
- A
))
$ $
$ &
$ @ % $
%% $
$ %
. @
$% 1
$1
$ . %% % %
$&
$
.$ $
%% %
)
.#
$ % $
$
$
$ %% .
$
@
$%
$
823 @
$%
%
%
A %
% % '$
A %
%
$ $ $
$ %%
$ %% % $
$
$
5.
% ) ) $1
))
$
$
%$
% 1
% $ $ %
$ %
/!?
! /
$
%%
$
@
$
@
% . %% %
823
$&
.
$
$
%
%
$ % . .$ $
/
% C
%
$
%%
&
.
$ %
A %
$1
.
$
A % $
%
$ %
&
(
1
C
&
.
$ %
%
$ $ A $1 $
$&
$ ) %%
)
% $A
A %
C
%$ .
$
$ . 823 )
A& $
& $
$
'$%
$ ! $ ## #*
A( .
$ 8 $
A $1
Advanced
Media Group
Recievables
Page538
24 of
LOCAL, STATE,
& FEDERAL
COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page
450
of119
499
811
0# 4
**
0# ** **
& 6
September13,
3, 2015
Thursday
Sunday November
10,
2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 26
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Advanced Media Group 2007
Aged Receivables
As of May 31, 2007
Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by ID. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Customer ID
Customer
Contact
Telephone 1
Invoice No
0001
S.N. Lombardo Development
Ralph Mazzocchi
717-394-3422
7001
0 - 30
31 - 60
0001
0002
Yolanda Caterbone
7002
0002
Yolanda Caterbone
0003
High Industries
S. Dale High
7003
0003
High Industries
0004
Fulton Bank/Lanc Co Sheriff
Terry Bergman
7004
0004
0005
Drew Anthon - Eden Resort Inn
Drew Anthon
7005
0005
0006
Harleysville Insurance Company
Claims Department
7006
7007
0006
Harleysville Insurance Compan
0007
7008
Over 90 days
Amount Due
1,871.00
1,871.00
1,871.00
1,871.00
1,545.00
1,545.00
1,545.00
1,545.00
15,221.40
15,221.40
15,221.40
15,221.40
67,147.45
67,147.45
67,147.45
67,147.45
24,118.00
24,118.00
24,118.00
24,118.00
7,898.19
6,878.25
7,898.19
6,878.25
14,776.44
14,776.44
944.90
944.90
Lancaster County
Treasurer
LOCAL,
STATE,
& FEDERAL COURT DOCKETS
DOCKDETSPage
Page 539
451 of 811
499
61 - 90
Page 1 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 27
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Aged Receivables
As of May 31, 2007
Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by ID. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Customer ID
Customer
Contact
Telephone 1
Invoice No
0 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
Over 90 days
Amount Due
Chris Reed
0007
Lancaster County Treasurer
Report Total
944.90
106,986.79
944.90
16,766.40

DOCKDETSPage
Page 540
452 of 811
499
Page 2 of 39
1,871.00
125,624.19
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case:
15-3400
Advanced Media
Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 28
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se
Billing File
Invoice Number:
7001
Invoice Date:
Mar 12, 2007
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
717-799-5915
717-427-1621
1
Duplicate
Ship To
Sold To:
c/o Ralph Mazzochi
33 Rider Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0001
C.O.D.
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Rep
Shipping Method
Ship Date
Due Date
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
| 3/12/07
USPS Priorty
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Extension
|
Quantity |
Item
Description
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00 |Hours
75.00 |
2,250.00 |
|
| Management Consulting Hours
|
|
|
| for Restuarant Development
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary for James Street
|
|
|
|
|
| District Zoning Meeting on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
13,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
-149.00 |
|
|
| Credit for fees paid in
|
|
|
|
| advanced including $100.00 in
|
|
|
|
|
| cash on March 9, 2007 and
|
|
|
|
|
| $49.00 in equipment with the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| purchase of a thumb drive on
|
|
|
|
|
| March 10,2007
|
|
|
|
|
| Fee includes all proofing and
|
|
|
|
|
| edits that were omitted from
|
|
|
|
|
| final print on March 12 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| at Office Max. The file
|
|
|
|
|
| Charollote Street Proposal
|
|
|
|
|
| March..amended.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
| that was given to Ralph
|
|
|
|
|
| Mazzocchi on March 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for
final
print
was
not
the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| file that the final print was
|
|
|
|
|
| taken from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Check No:

DOCKDETSPage
Page 541
453 of 811
499
Page 3 of 39
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Total Invoice Amount
Payment Received
Continued
Continued
Continued
TOTAL
Continued
Continued
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case:
15-3400
Advanced Media
Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 29
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se
Billing File
Invoice Number:
7001
Invoice Date:
Mar 12, 2007
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
717-799-5915
717-427-1621
2
Duplicate
Ship To
Sold To:
c/o Ralph Mazzochi
33 Rider Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0001
C.O.D.
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Rep
Shipping Method
Ship Date
Due Date
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
| 3/12/07
USPS Priorty
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Extension
|
Quantity |
Item
Description
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
-230.00 |
|
|
| March 24, 2007 Raplph Mazzochi
|
|
|
|
| Payment from Copy Max, did not
|
|
|
|
|
| return proposals - Total Paid
|
|
|
|
|
| To Date $379.00.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Check No:

DOCKDETSPage
Page 542
454 of 811
499
Page 4 of 39
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
1,871.00
TOTAL
$1,871.00
1,871.00
0.00
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 30
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Invoice
Invoice Number:

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Voice:
Fax:
7002
Invoice Date:
Apr 9, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Page:
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:
Yolanda Caterbone
7960 N.W.
201 Terrace
Hialeah, FL 33015
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0002
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price
May to October 2005 1250

Fremont Street Grass
Cuttins 4 Per Month At
$15.00 Per Cutting
May to October 2006 1250
Fremont Street Grass
Cuttins 4 Per Month At
$15.00 Per Cutting
December to March 2005
1250 Fremont Street Snow
Removal 4 Times At $20.00
March 2007 Seal Hardwood
Floors
March 2007 Spray Paint
Oven Hood
April 2007 Trim Shrubs
Check No:

DOCKDETSPage
Page 543
455 of 811
499
Due Date
4/9/07
Page 5 of 39
Extension
300.00
300.00
80.00
80.00
80.00
75.00
15.00
65.00
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
Continued
Continued
Continued
Continued
TOTAL
Continued
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 31
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Invoice
Invoice Number:

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Voice:
Fax:
7002
Invoice Date:
Apr 9, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Page:
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:
Yolanda Caterbone
7960 N.W.
201 Terrace
Hialeah, FL 33015
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0002
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price
Front and Back

Fall 2005 1250 Fremont
Street Cleanup Leaves
Fall 2006 1250 Fremont
Street Cleanup Leaves
March 2007 1250 Fremont
Street Install Stairway
Oriental Rug Runner on
Steps
March 2007 Oriental Rug
Stair Runner
Springl 2006 Trim Lilac &
Disposal
Check No:

DOCKDETSPage
Page 544
456 of 811
499
Due Date
4/9/07
Page 6 of 39
Extension
150.00
150.00
75.00
50.00
125.00
1,545.00
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
1,545.00
0.00
TOTAL
1,545.00
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case:
15-3400
Advanced Media
Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 32
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se
Billing File
Invoice Number:
7003
Invoice Date:
Apr 27, 2007
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Ship To
Sold To:
High Industries
1833 William Penn Way
Greenfiled Industrial Park
Lancaster, PA 17601
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0003
C.O.D.
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Rep
Shipping Method
Ship Date
Due Date
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
| 4/27/07
USPS Priorty
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________
| Extension
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
Quantity |
Item
Description
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200.00 |
|
|
| 1991 Past Due Invoice for
|
|
|
|
| CD-ROM mastering and
|
|
|
|
|
| replication from NIST,
|
|
|
|
|
| Commodore (Titus), AMP, etc.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Interest
to
Date
10,021.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| at 10% per Annum Compounded
|
|
|
|
|
| Annually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
Check No:
TOTAL

DOCKDETSPage
Page 545
457 of 811
499
Page 7 of 39
15,221.40
15,221.40
0.00
$15,221.40
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 33
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 546
458 of 811
499
Page 8 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 34
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 547
459 of 811
499
Page 9 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case:
15-3400
Advanced Media
Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 35
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se
Billing File
Invoice Number:
7004
Invoice Date:
May 13, 2007
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
717-799-5915
717-427-1621
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship To

One Penn Square
Lancaster, PA 17602
Lancaster County Sheriff Dept.

Lancaster County Courthouse
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0004
C.O.D.
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Rep
Shipping Method
Ship Date
Due Date
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
| 5/13/07
USPS Priorty
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Extension
|
Quantity |
Item
Description
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 220 Stone Hill Road Property |
|
|
|
|
| Fair Market Value Less Sales
|
|
|
|
|
| Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Fair Market Value per
|
|
|
217,454.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fulton
Bank
Form
1099-A;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parula Property Realty
|
|
|
|
|
| Transfer Tax Statement of
|
|
|
|
|
| Value; Real Estate Appraisals
|
|
|
|
|
| December 20, 2006 Sheriff Sale
|
| -156,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Auction Price
|
|
|
17,306.00 |
|
|
| February 1, 2007 Disbursement
|
|
|
|
| Check To Stan J. Caterbone
|
|
|
|
|
| Barley Snyder Lecal Fees &
|
|
-9,612.80 |
|
|
| Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2,000.00 |
|
|
| Sheriff Dept Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
Check No:
TOTAL

DOCKDETSPage
Page 548
460 of 811
499
Page 10 of 39
67,147.45
67,147.45
0.00
$67,147.45
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 36
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
220 Stone Hill Road Documented

Fair Market Values In Year 2006
Average From 4 Fair Market Values = $217,454.25
1.
220 Stone Hill Rd, Conestoga, PA 17516

ZESTIMATE: $213,999
Value Range: $194,739 - $301,739
02/24/2006
1.

ZESTIMATE: $220,866
09/21/2006
2.
FULTON BANK FORM 1099-A

Fair Market Value of Property (Box 4): $250,000
Tax Year 2006
3.
REALTY TRANSFER TAX

STATEMENT OF VALUE
Box 6. Fair Market Value = 184,952.00
$ 217,454.25 Average Fair Market Value
$ 156,000.00 Sheriff Sale Price of Auction
$ 61,454.25 Fair Market Value Not Realized (Extortion)
$ 89,125.78 Mortgage Balance As of June 2005
$ 44,111,04 Total Attorney Fees and Costs
$ 20,000.00 Estimated Overcharge By Barley Snyder, LLC
$
3,000.00 Estimated Overcharge By Sheriffs Department
$ 84,454.25 Amount Owed By Fulton Bank And Lancaster

County Sheriffs Department
$ 17,306.80 Amount of Disbursement
$ 67,147.45 Balance Due

DOCKDETSPage
Page 549
461 of 811
499
Page 11 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 37
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 550
462 of 811
499
Page 12 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
15-3400
003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Zillow.com - DataCase:
& Graphs
- Real EstateDocument:
Value, Local Real
Estate
Trends
http://www.zillow.com/Charts.z?chartDuration=1year&zpid=9692127
Stan
J. Caterbone
and 38
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

ZESTIMATE:
$213,999
Value Range: $194,739 - $301,739
Market Value Change Show: $ Dollar | % Percentage

Time frame: 1yr| 5yr| 10yr|
Compare:
This home
17516
Conestoga
Lancaster
PA
USA
Show sales
Zestimate Rankings
This home at $213,999 is valued higher than:
Zindex (Median Zestimate)
64% of homes in 17516 ZIP code
$186,718
63% of homes in Conestoga
$186,674
72% of homes in Lancaster County
$169,051
65% of homes in PA state
$186,373
40% of homes in United States
$261,421

DOCKDETSPage
Page 551
463 of 811
499
1 of 2
Page 13 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
2/24/2006 4:12 PM
05.17.2007
15-3400
003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Zillow.com - DataCase:
& Graphs
- Real EstateDocument:
Value, Local Real
Estate
Trends
http://www.zillow.com/Charts.z?chartDuration=1year&zpid=9692127
Stan
J. Caterbone
and 39
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Historical Value Trends Show as: n

i% n
j
k
l
m
j$ n
k
l
m
j % annualized
k
l
m
Past:
This home
17516
Conestoga
Lancaster
PA
US
30 days
0.7%
0.9%
1.3%
0.7%
-13%
0.6%
1 year
17%
15%
15%
12%
4.4%
21%
5 years
63%
57%
58%
52%
77%
90%
10 years
--
--
--
--
111%
104%
Last sale ()
--
--
--
--
--
--
Tax Information
2005
Property tax:
$2,519
Assessed value bldgs:
$96,400
Assessed value land:
$55,200
Total assessed value:
$151,600
Sale History
No sale history is available for this home
2006 Zillow.com, All Rights Reserved

DOCKDETSPage
Page 552
464 of 811
499
2 of 2
Page 14 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
2/24/2006 4:12 PM
05.17.2007
Zillow - 220 Stone Hill Rd, Conestoga, PA 17516
1 of 4
Case: 15-3400
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?city=Conestoga&state=PA&z...
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 40
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Welcome amgroup01! (Not amgroup01? Sign out.)

ZESTIMATE: $220,866
View large map

View maps side-by-side
Map comparable homes
Home Facts
Public Facts
Owner's Facts

DOCKDETSPage
Page 553
465 of 811
499
Page 15 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
9/21/2006 11:58 AM
Zillow - 220 Stone Hill Rd, Conestoga, PA 17516
2 of 4
Case: 15-3400
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?city=Conestoga&state=PA&z...
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 41
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Home Facts
Owner Facts
Residence:
Single family
Bedrooms:
Bathrooms:
2.0
Sq ft:
1,060
Lot size:
82,764 sq ft / 1.90 acres
Year built:
1995
Year updated:
--
# Stories:
Total rooms:
Basement:
Finished
Roof type:
Asphalt
Primary exterior material:
--
View:
--
Primary parking type:
Garage - Attached
Covered parking spaces:
--
Primary heating source:
--
Primary heating system:
Heat pump
Primary cooling system:
Central
Architectural style:
--
Fireplace:
Yes
Swimming pool:
--
Waterfront:
--
County:
Lancaster
Parcel #: 1203252300000
Zillow Home ID:
9692127
Legal description: --
Are you the owner?

Learn More
Learn More
Zestimate: $220,866
Show fewer home facts

DOCKDETSPage
Page 554
466 of 811
499
Page 16 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
9/21/2006 11:58 AM
Case:- 15-3400
Document:
003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 42
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
ProPage
Se Billing
Zillow.com
Real Estate Search
Results
1 of 2 File
Showing 10 comparable recent sales for 220 Stone Hill Rd, Conestoga, PA 17516
2006 NAVTEQ | 2006 GlobeXplorer and Suppliers | 2006 Proxix

Comparable
recent sales
Sold
Price
Date Sold
BR BA Home Lot
Home
(sq ft) (sq ft) $/sq
ft
Lot
$/sq
ft
Year
Built
Dist
(mi)
220 Stone
Hill Rd
--
--
1,060
82,764 $196
$3
1995
--
213 Stone Hill

Rd
$208,000 05/15/2006 3
1,096
82,764 $190
$3
1998
0.08
561 Stone Hill

Rd
$260,000 01/24/2006 3
1.5 1,304
82,764 $199
$3
1997
0.43
101 W Elm St
$210,000 06/01/2006 3
1.5 1,516
19,602 $139
$11
1974
0.48
15 Orchard Ln
$163,000 04/10/2006 4
1.5 1,028
16,552 $159
$10
1985
0.41
5 Orchard Ln
$162,500 07/06/2005 3
1.5 994
16,552 $163
$10
1984
0.33
3455 Main St
$182,900 10/04/2005 4
1,456
16,988 $126
$11
1930
0.35
410 Kendig Rd
$175,000 01/05/2006 3
1,272
30,927 $138
$6
1963
0.67
2834 Main St
$129,000 11/30/2005 3
1,105
21,780 $117
$6
1942
0.56
24 E Elm St
$143,000 07/22/2005 3
1,344
17,424 $106
$8
1946
0.65
70 River
Corner Rd
$159,900 10/12/2005 4
1,841
8,276
$19
1890
0.45
Averages
$179,330 --
1.5 1,296
$9
--
--
$87
31,363 $142
Choose your comps with My Zestimator

DOCKDETSPage
Page 555
467 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
http://www.zillow.com/search/Search.htm?expand=false&mode=comps&zpid=9692127
7/10/2006
Page 17 of 39
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 43
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 556
468 of 811
499
Page 18 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 44
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 557
469 of 811
499
Page 19 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 45
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 558
470 of 811
499
Page 20 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Stan J. Caterbone
and46
Advanced
Stan
J.Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Document: 003112143900
Page:
DateMedia
12/02/2015

DOCKDETSPage
Page 559
471 of 811
499
Page 21 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 47
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 560
472 of 811
499
Page 22 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 48
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Invoice Number:
7005
Invoice Date:
May 13, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:

222 Eden Road
Lancaster, PA 17601
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0005
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price
Medical Expenses, Legal Costs,

and Adminstration Costs
Associated with CI-05-03644
Check No:

DOCKDETSPage
Page 561
473 of 811
499
Due Date
5/13/07
Page 23 of 39
Extension
24,118.00
24,118.00
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
24,118.00
0.00
TOTAL
24,118.00
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112143900

Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 49
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
PROJECT HOPE
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
Plaintiff
Case No. CI-05-03644
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
222 Eden Road
Lancaster, PA 17601
Defendant
NOTICE
ITEMS FOR CLAIM
Plaintiff files the following ITEMS FOR CLAIM.
1.
Plaintiff filed the civil action in good faith and did suffer substantial stress related health
problems that that were triggered when the Plaintiff read the Lancaster Newspapers Intelligencer
article regarding the same (Tea Party) as well as business financial losses.
2.
Medical Expenses from Lower Back Pain Due To Stress Excelsior Place Business Plan Fees UPS Store Lost Opportunity SUB TOTAL
ATTORNEY FEES AND ADMINISTRATION TOTAL -
$5,184.00
$7,000.00
$10,000.00
___________
$22,118.00
2,000.00
$24,118.00
I hereby certify that appropriate Notices Items For Claim has been mailed in accordance with PA R.C.P.
237.1 on the dales indicated on the Notices.
STAN J. CATERBONE
PROJECT HOPE
By:______________________________
STAN J. CATERBONE, Pro Se
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
Plaintiffs address is:
Stan J. Caterbone, 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA 17516 And that the last know11 address of the
Defendant is: 222 Eden Road, Lancaster, PA 17601
DOCKDETSPage
Page 562
474 of 811
499
Page 24 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112143900

Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 50
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
CIVIL DIVISION
PROJECT HOPE
Plaintiff
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
Defendant
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER
TO:
( ) Plaintiff
(XX) Defendant
( )Garnishee
You are hereby notified that the following
Order or Judgment was entered against you
On January 20, 2006
(XX) Assumpsit Judgment in the amount
of $11,000 plus costs.
( )
Trespass Judgment in the amount

of $_________ plus costs.
( )
If not satisfied within sixty (60)
days, your motor vehicle operator'$ license and/or registration
will be suspended by the Department of Transportation, Bureau
of Traffic Safety, Harrisburg, PA
(XX) Entry of Judgment of
( ) Court Order
( ) Non-Pros
( ) Confession
(xx) Default
( ) Verdict
( ) Arbitration
Award
Prothonotary
By: ______________________________
PROTHONOTARY (OR DEPUTY)
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
222 Eden Road, Lancaster, PA 17601
Plaintiffs address is:
Stan J. Caterbone, 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA 17516 717-799-5915
DOCKDETSPage
Page 563
475 of 811
499
Page 25 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112143900

Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 51
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
CIVIL DIVISION
PROJECT HOPE
Plaintiff
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
Defendant
IMPORTANT NOTICE
TO:
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
222 Eden Road, Lancaster, PA 17601
Date of Notice: January 20, 2006

YOU ARE IN DEFAULT BECAUSE YOU HAVE FAILED TO ENTER A WRITTEN
APPEARANCE PERSONALLY OR BY ATTORNEY AND FILE IN WRITING WITH THE COURT YOUR
DEFENSES OR OBJECTIONS TO THE CLAIMS SET FORTH AGAINST YOU UNLESS YOU ACT
WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED
AGAINST YOU WITHOUT A HEARING AND YOU MAY LOSE YOUR PROPERTY OR OTHER
IMPORTANT RIGHTS. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE FOLLOWING OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW.
THIS OFFICE CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT HIRING A LAWYER. IF YOU
CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE TI PROVIDE YOU WITH
INFORMATION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY OFFER LEGAL SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS
AT A REDUCED FEE OR NO FEE.
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE
50 NORTH DUKE STREET
P.O. BOX 3480
LANCASTER, PA 17602
(717) 299-8041
BY: _______________________________
STAN J. CATERBONE
PROJECT HOPE/ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
717-799-5915

DOCKDETSPage
Page 564
476 of 811
499
Page 26 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112143900

Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 52
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
make the following civil complaint against the defendant, Drew Anthon and Eden Resort Inn and Conference
Center:
Plaintiff alleges Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn and Conference Center has colluded to sabotage the
Downtown Lancaster Convention Center project by organizing a formal request and soliciting support to
certain Lancaster County Hoteliers to voluntarily withhold the payment of the Lancaster County Hotel Room
Tax, thereby placing the financial interests of the Business Plan for the Excelsior Property of East King Street
and the Rights to develop a UPS Store in or around the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center at extreme
risk.
Plaintiff will argue that such financial risk is causing mental stress and duress, that otherwise would not be
present, had the defendant not engaged the above-mentioned activities.
Plaintiff seeks the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to place a sees and desist order against the defendants
actions to withhold the Hotel tax until the defendants can prove to the Commonwealth the said actions are in the
best interests of the Plaintiffs interests and those of all major stakeholders of the proposed Downtown Lancaster
Convention Center, including the School District of Lancaster, the City of Lancaster, the County of Lancaster,
Penn Square Partners, as well as others. Thus the defendants must prove that the Downtown Lancaster
Convention Center will fail.
Plaintiff submits the following exhibits for considerations of the Courts:
x The major pages of the website of Advanced Media Group
x The Excelsior Place Business Plan
x The Agreement Between Art Ward, Owner of the UPS Store and Stan Caterbone
Plaintiff seeks a jury trial with damages in excess of $10,000.
Stan J. Caterbone/Project Hope/Advanced Media Group

Dated: April 26, 2005

DOCKDETSPage
Page 565
477 of 811
499
Page 27 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 53
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Businessman, irked by hotelier action, files suit

By Justin Quinn
Intelligencer Journal
Published: May 06, 2005 9:47 AM EST
LANCASTER COUNTY, PA - A local businessman filed a $100,000 lawsuit last

month against Drew Anthon, owner of Eden Resort Inn and Conference Center, claiming
Anthon "colluded to sabotage" the proposed Lancaster County Convention Center by
announcing his intention to withhold the county hotel room tax.
Conestoga resident Stan J. Caterbone is asking that a local judge place a "sees (sic)
and desist order" on Anthon and the hotel to prevent them from withholding the room
tax.
The suit was filed April 26, the day the Intelligencer Journal reported Anthon and
several other hoteliers were threatening to withhold payment of the room tax, most of
which goes toward a hotel and convention center proposed for Penn Square. The next
room tax payment is due May 26.
Caterbone is founder of Advanced Media Group, 1857 Colonial Village Lane, an
information technologies company specializing in optical publishing. He claims in the
lawsuit that Anthon's actions place "at extreme risk" Caterbone's plans to develop a UPS
store and an office complex called "Excelsior Place" across from the proposed convention
center. "Plaintiff will argue that such financial risk is causing mental stress and duress that
otherwise would not be present, had the defendant not engaged (in) the above-mentioned
activities," Caterbone says in the suit.
The suit asks for a court order to force the hoteliers to pay the tax "until the
defendants can prove to the commonwealth the said actions are in the best interests of
the (plaintiff) and those of all major stakeholders of the proposed downtown Lancaster
convention center, including School District of Lancaster, the City of Lancaster, the County
of Lancaster, Penn Square Partners, as well as others. Thus, the defendants must prove
that the downtown Lancaster convention center will fail."
A person who answered the phone at the number listed in the lawsuit as
Caterbone's did not identify himself. "All the information is public," the man said when
asked about the suit. "You can go there."
As exhibits, the lawsuit includes Web pages from Caterbone's company and a bound
volume titled "The Excelsior Place Business Plan."
The suit also includes a handwritten agreement between Caterbone and Art Ward,
owner of the UPS Store. Anthon did not return a reporter's phone calls. A judge has not
been assigned to the case.

DOCKDETSPage
Page 566
478 of 811
499
Page 28 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 54
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Invoice Number:
7006
Invoice Date:
May 13, 2007
717-799-5915
717-427-1621
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:

308 Harper Drive
P.O. Box 1016
Moorestown, NJ 08057-0916
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0006
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price
AMG Consulting Income

March 16, 2006 Claim Number 2F
MO-658554-U XC Aainst
Homeowners Policy Number
HOA193468
April 12th, 2006 Claim Number
MO-654619-U XC Against
Homeowners Policy Number
HOA193468
Check No:

DOCKDETSPage
Page 567
479 of 811
499
Due Date
5/13/07
Page 29 of 39
Extension
7,898.19
7,898.19
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
7,898.19
0.00
TOTAL
7,898.19
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Document: 003112143900
Office Max
WHERE
PURCHASED
2000
Walmart
SunSetter Online
Cyberwarehouse, Lancaster, PA
Lowes
Ebay
SunSetter Online
Circuit City
SunSetter Rain Guards
DVD/RW Drive
1 4X8 Roofing Sheating
HP Laptop N5101
SunSetter 16X10 Awning
Apple Video 60 GB Ipod
10 pcs 1X4X8 Pressure Treated Lumber Lowes
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
37.99
33.70
425.00
1,600.00
1,400.00
9.99
89.99
278.00
4,327.67
33.70
0.00
1,438.00
1,400.00
9.99
89.99
0.00
37.99
598.00
10.00
0.00
25.00
500.00
35.00
150.00
COST TO
REPAIR
LESS
DEDUCTIBLE
Total Page 1
DEPRECIATION
Page 30 of 39
$5,732.66
AMOUNT
CLAIMED
Date Filed: 12/02/2015
State law requires us to include the following statement - Any person who knowingly files a statement of claim containing any
false or misleading information is subject to criminal and civil penalties.
Aug-05
Dec-06
Apr-02
Nov-00
Mar-06
Oct-05
Apr-05
2000
Hijoka Plumbing
Rheam RH0900B169002 Hot Water

Heater
Vector Sport Super Spot VEC127Y
598.00
10.00
Mar-06
1 20 Gal Propane Tank
39.99
Mar-06
Kmart, Fuitville Pike, Lancaster,

PA
GR Michells, Willow Street, PA
Sony Digital Recorder ICD-B120
25.00
May-05
1,000.00
May-05
Barnstormers Clipper Stadium
35.00
150.00
COST TO
REPLACE
Sep-05
1999
DATE
PURCHAS
ED
Lancaster Barnstormers Cap
1991 Dodge Pickup Dakota Registration City Line Auto Sales

Papers
Compaq Desktop SR1300NX
Iomega Zip Drive
ITEM
(Give Full Description)
Page 1 of 2
INSURED: Stanley Caterbone
Work In Progress Report As Of April 19 2006 - Updated May 18 2006 3:00 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 568
480 of 811
499
CLAIM NUMBER: M0-
Page: 55
SCHEDULE OF ARTICLES STOLEN, DAMAGED OR DESTROYED
Case: 15-3400
ALLOWED
05.17.2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Document: 003112143900
42.56
2005
SchoolHouse Power Equipment,

Conestoga, PA
Kmart, Fruitville Pike, Lancaster, March, 2006

PA
Little Giant Mower Battery/Tune Up
75.00
69.00
Motorola Earphone
DEPRECIATION
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
Page 31 of 39
6,111.64
LESS
DEDUCTIBLE
Grand Total
$7,898.19
2,165.53
AMOUNT
CLAIMED
1,783.97 Total Page 2
49.00
Plantronics Earphones
743.00
200.00
0.00
0.00
119.00
199.00
199.00
75.00
49.99
Sony DVD/Video Recorder Player
200.00
49.99
149.99
129.99
COST TO
REPAIR
Cash
Cash
Sony Digital Recorder
Kmart, Fruitville Pike, Lancaster, April, 2005

PA
1,200.00
2006
27" Sony TV/DVD Remote Control
Averatec 6200 series with Windows X
119.00
2005
2005
Lowes
Leaf Blower/Vaccum
149.99
2001
EBay Auction Site
129.99
Sony 19" Television
May-05
COST TO
REPLACE
DATE
PURCHAS
ED
CD Rom Drive HP Desktop Computer
ITEM
WHERE
PURCHASED
Work In Progress Report As Of April 19 2006 - Updated May 18 2006 3:00 am

DOCKDETSPage
Page 569
481 of 811
499
CLAIM NUMBER: M0-
Page: 56
Case: 15-3400
ALLOWED
05.17.2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,

DOCKDETSPage
Page 570
482 of 811
499
C-I 139nj (4101)
Sign Here
Dated
Document: 003112143900
Page 32 of 39
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Case: 15-3400
Page: 57
05.17.2007

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 58
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Invoice
Invoice Number:

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Voice:
Fax:
7007
Invoice Date:
May 15, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Page:
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:

308 Harper Drive
P.O. Box 1016
Moorestown, NJ 08057-0916
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0006
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price
May 15, 2007 Claim Number

MO-702274 Does Not Include
Time Management Calenders
and Desktop Calenders
Check No:

DOCKDETSPage
Page 571
483 of 811
499
Due Date
5/15/07
Page 33 of 39
Extension
6,878.25
6,878.25
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
6,878.25
0.00
TOTAL
6,878.25
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007

DOCKDETSPage
Page 572
484 of 811
499
1-Tetra Pond High Volume Filter

1- Tetra High Volume Pump
1-6 Person Picnic Table
1-Digging Iron
1-Gas Powered Weed Eater
1-3 Ft. Saint Francis Stone Fountain and Statue
1-Central Security System Control Panel w/9 Motion Detectors
1-Chimney Screen
1-Free Standing Kodiak Wood Stove & Cleaning Tools
1-Aiwa Receivers
2-Omnis Surround Sound Shelf Speakers
1-Saint Francis Childrens Book by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
1-Fillings Dress Overcoat
1-Hair Dryer
4-100 pt Cotton Dress Shirts
1-Black Western Belt
1-The Springs White Robe
3-Hooded Sweatshirts, Pflumm, Stone Harbor Beach Patrol
1-Blackberry
1-SONY Digital Mavica Camera & Accessories
300-Newspapers for Litigation
7-Patio Blinds
100 Drill Bits and Drivers
18 Volt Dewalt Hammer Drill

1-New Not Used 10X18 Ft. Sun Setter Awning
1-Low Volume High Pressure Paint Sprayer
15-Miscellaneous Automobile Waxes, Compounds, and Cleaners

CLAIM NUMBER: M0-702274
ITEM
Document: 003112143900
Page: 59
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
11
2
8
04/15/05 eBAY Auction

Lowes Store, Lancaster, PA
02/01/98 Home Depot, Lancaster, PA
04/06/05 eBAY Auction

05/17/99 Office Max, Sunrise, FL
Lancaster Newspapers
07/10/06 Lowes Store, Lancaster, PA
Misc Purchases
01/10/96 Carters Lumber Supply, Lancaster, PA
05/06/01 That Fish Place, Lancaster, PA

05/15/01 Online Purchase
Family Hierloom From Childhood
Pflumm Contractors, not purchased
06/01/02 Gift from Ben Roda
07/15/01 Gift from Pam Pflumm & Family
08/26/05 Yarnell Security System
02/01/04 Home Depot, Lancaster, PA
11/15/05 Newspater Advertisement, Conestoga, PA
01/08/00 Costco, Lancaster, PA
01/25/00 David Porter, Lancaster, PA
12/08/05 Amazon Books
02/15/86 Fillings Mens Store
Gift from Yolanda Caterbone
06/25/05 Kohls Department Store, Lancaster, PA
12/25/01 Gift from Pam Pflumm & Family
08/05/05 The Springs, Pismo Beach, CA
PURCHASED
PURCHASED
07/01/02 Sunsetter Inc - Online
05/05/99 Brian Langsett of Conestoga,PA
Pep Boys, Wallmart, etc, Lancaster, PA
WHEN
Page 34 of 39
C-I 139nj (4101)

1-Harmony Universal USB Remote Control

1-Roll 36" X 100 Ft Plastic Sheeting
1-36" Metal T-Square
Daily Time Management Business Calenders 1986-1991
Each Daily Page has business notes and meeting notes that is part
of my Federal Litigation for Personal and Advanced Media Group 052288;06-4650;06-3955;etc.
Desktop Monthly Calenders 1997 to 2000
5
8
6
6
45
11
5
6
1.5
3
1
7
7
1
21
4
1.5
5
1.5
AGE OF ITEM
WHERE
Case: 15-3400
TOTAL
05.17.2007
$6,878.25
$103.00
$24.00
$29.99
$133.32
$69.00
$150.00
$75.00
$89.00
$69.00
$1,800.00
$49.00
$600.00
$179.00
$169.00
$49.00
$399.95
$29.00
$120.00
$69.00
$59.00
$79.00
$155.00
$741.99
$100.00
$79.00
$200.00
$150.00
REPLACE
$300.00
$708.00
$100.00
COST TO

Stan Media
J. Caterbone,
Case: 15-3400

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 60
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Invoice Number:
7008
Invoice Date:
May 17, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:
Dale R. Denlinger
Clerk of Courts
Lancaster, PA 17602
Lancaster County Treasurer

Lancaster, PA 17602
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0007
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price
District Court Docket No.

NT-0000562-06 Summary Appeal
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Obstruction of Highway Not
Guilty on April 30, 2007 Fines
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Disorderly Conduct Not Guilty
on April 30, 2007 Fines
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Harassment Withdrawn on April
30, 2007 Fines Collected
Check No:

DOCKDETSPage
Page 573
485 of 811
499
Due Date
5/17/07
Page 35 of 39
Extension
167.20
400.20
377.50
944.90
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
944.90
0.00
TOTAL
944.90
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 61
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY

DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000028-2007
SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET

Non-Traffic
v.
Stanley Jay Caterbone
Page 3 of 6
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Disposition Date
Final Disposition
Section
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Credit For Time Served
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Start Date
Lower Court Proceeding (generic)
Lower Court Disposition
01/22/2007
Not Final
04/30/2007
Final Disposition
Not Guilty
Summary Appeal Trial

1 / Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi Off
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5503 A4
2 / Obstruction Highways
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5507 A
3 / Harassment - Course of Conduct W/No

Legitimate Purpose
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Nolle Prossed
18 2709 A3
04/30/2007
COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION
Name:
Name:
Supreme Court No:
Supreme Court No:

Counsel Status:
Phone Number(s):
AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007
Printed: 05/04/2007
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
DOCKDETSPage
Page 574
486 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10,
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
Page 36 of 39
2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 62
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 575
487 of 811
499
Page 37 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 63
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 576
488 of 811
499
Page 38 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 64
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 577
489 of 811
499
Page 39 of 39
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 65
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Invoice Number:
7008
Invoice Date:
May 17, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:
Dale R. Denlinger
Clerk of Courts
Lancaster, PA 17602
MDJ Leo Eckert Jr.

841 Stehman Road
Millersvile, PA 17551
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0007
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price

Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Check No:

DOCKDETSPage
Page 578
490 of 811
499
Due Date
5/17/07
Page 1 of 5
Extension
167.20
400.20
377.50
944.90
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
944.90
0.00
TOTAL
944.90
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 66
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKET

Non-Traffic
v.
Page 3 of 6
Disposition
Case Event
Sentencing Judge
Disposition Date
Final Disposition
Section
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Start Date
01/22/2007
Not Final
04/30/2007
Final Disposition
Not Guilty

Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5503 A4
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5507 A

Legitimate Purpose
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Nolle Prossed
18 2709 A3
04/30/2007
Name:
Name:
Supreme Court No:
Supreme Court No:

Counsel Status:
Phone Number(s):
AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007
Printed: 05/04/2007
DOCKDETSPage
Page 579
491 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10,
Page 2 of 5
2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 67
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 580
492 of 811
499
Page 3 of 5
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 68
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 581
493 of 811
499
Page 4 of 5
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 69
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 582
494 of 811
499
Page 5 of 5
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 70
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File
Invoice Number:
7008
Invoice Date:
May 17, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:
Dale R. Denlinger
Clerk of Courts
Lancaster, PA 17602
MDJ Isaac Stotzfus

14 Center Street
Intercourse, PA 17534
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0007
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price

Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Check No:

DOCKDETSPage
Page 583
495 of 811
499
Due Date
5/17/07
Page 1 of 5
Extension
167.20
400.20
377.50
944.90
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
944.90
0.00
TOTAL
944.90
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 71
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKET

Non-Traffic
v.
Page 3 of 6
Disposition
Case Event
Sentencing Judge
Disposition Date
Final Disposition
Section
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Start Date
01/22/2007
Not Final
04/30/2007
Final Disposition
Not Guilty

Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5503 A4
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5507 A

Legitimate Purpose
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Nolle Prossed
18 2709 A3
04/30/2007
Name:
Name:
Supreme Court No:
Supreme Court No:

Counsel Status:
Phone Number(s):
AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007
Printed: 05/04/2007
DOCKDETSPage
Page 584
496 of 811
499
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10,
Page 2 of 5
2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 72
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 585
497 of 811
499
Page 3 of 5
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 73
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 586
498 of 811
499
Page 4 of 5
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
Case: 15-3400
Document: 003112143900
Page:
Date
12/02/2015
Stan J. Caterbone
and 74
Advanced
Stan
Media
J. Filed:
Caterbone,
Group,
Pro Se Billing File

DOCKDETSPage
Page 587
499 of 811
499
Page 5 of 5
Thursday
Sunday November 13,
10, 2016
05.17.2007
CHAPTER
DIVIDER

Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance, Registered in the State of Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT
IN RE:
Case NO. 1164 EDA 2016
Montgomery Court Case No.

Docket No. 8423-15
:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
v.
KATHLEEN KANE
:
:
REQUEST THE COURTESY OF THE COURT TO APPEAR PRO SE AND TO FILE

AN AMICUS CURAIE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE FOLLOWING
Media Group, request for Appearance to file an Amicus in the above captioned case to support the
following:
1.
Quashing the charges in case Montgomery Court Case No. 8423-15
2. In support of any other relief this Court deems just and proper.
The following Amicus should provide this Court with the proper jurisdiction for legal standing
to consider this Amicus according to Rule 531 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Procedure.
Rule 531. Participation by Amicus Curiae.

(a) Briefs.Anyone interested in the questions involved in any matter pending in an appellate court,
excluding Petitions for Allowance of Appeal, although not a party, may, without applying for leave to
do so, file a brief amicus curiae in regard to those questions.
(1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, any amicus curiae shall file and serve its brief in the
manner and number required and within the time allowed by these rules with respect to the party
whose position as to affirmance or reversal the amicus brief will support, or with respect to the
appellant, if the amicus brief does not support the position of any party.
SuperiorSTATE,
LOCAL,
Court 1164
& FEDERAL
EDA 2016
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
595
1 of 811
2
Sunday
Tuesday,
November
May13,
3, 2016

(2) In an appeal proceeding under Rules 2154(b), 2185(c) and 2187(b), any amicus curiae shall file
and serve its brief within the time allowed by these rules for service of the advance text of the brief
by the party whose position as to affirmance or reversal the amicus brief will support or, if the amicus
brief does not support the position of any party, within the time allowed by these rules for service of
the advance text by the appellant. Alternatively, the amicus curiae may, but is not required to, serve
an advance text and then file and serve a definitive copy of its brief. If the amicus curiae chooses to
serve an advance copy and then file and serve a definitive copy, its deadlines for each are the same
as for the party whose position as to affirmance or reversal the amicus brief supports or, if the
amicus brief does not support the position of any party, as for the appellant.
(b) Oral argument.Oral argument may be presented by amicus curiae only as the appellate court
may direct. Requests for leave to present oral argument shall be by application and will be granted
only for extraordinary reasons.
Official Note
Where the amicus cannot comply with the requirements of this rule because of ignorance of the
pendency of the question, relief may be sought under Rule 105(b). The last eight words of the rule
are new. In Piccirilli Bros. v. Lewis, 282 Pa. 328, 336, 127 Atl. 832, 835 (1925) the court noted the
applicability of this rule to public officers who are represented by official counsel with an adverse
position.
The 2011 amendment to the rule clarified when those filing amicus curiae briefs should serve and file
their briefs when the appellant has chosen or the parties have been directed to proceed under the
rules related to large records (Rule 2154(b)), advance text (Rule 2187(b)) and definitive copies (Rule
2185(c)). Under those rules, the appellant may defer preparation of the reproduced record until after
the briefs have been served. The parties serve on one another (but do not file) advance texts of their
briefs within the times required by Rule 2187. At the time they file their advance texts, each party
includes certified record designations for inclusion in the reproduced record. The appellant must then
prepare and file the reproduced record within 21 days of service of the appellees advance text (Rule
2186(a)(2)). Within 14 days of the filing of the reproduced record, each party that served a brief in
advance text may file and serve definitive copies of their briefs. The definitive copy must include
references to the pages of the reproduced record, but it may not otherwise include changes from the
advance text other than correction of typographical errors. Those filing amicus curiae briefs may
choose to serve an advance text and then file and serve definitive copies according to the procedure
required of the parties or they may choose to file a definitive brief without citations to the reproduced
record.
Date: May 3, 2016
_____
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
(717) 669-2163
SuperiorSTATE,
LOCAL,
Court 1164
& FEDERAL
EDA 2016
COURT DOCKETS Page
Page
596
2 of 811
2
Sunday
Tuesday,
November
May13,
3, 2016
:
:
:
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Appellant
1164 EDA 2016
PROOF OF SERVICE - DRAFT
I hereby certify that this 2nd day of May, 2016, I have served the attached document(s) to the persons on the date(s) and
in the manner(s) stated below, which service satisfies the requirements of Pa.R.A.P. 121:
Service
Served:
Service Method:
Email:
Service Date:
Address:
Phone:
Representing:
Amil Michael Minora

Email
amil.minora@gmail.com
5/2/2016
Served:
Service Method:
Email:
Service Date:
Address:
Amil Michael Minora

eService
amil.minora@gmail.com
Phone:
Representing:
Served:
Service Method:
Email:
Service Date:
Address:
Phone:
Representing:
PACFile 1001
570-961-1616
Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane
700 Vine Street

Scranton, PA 18510
570--96-1-1616
Assistant Counsel Seth C. Farber
Email
sfarber@winston.com
5/2/2016
212-294-6700
Page 1 of 3
Print Date: 5/2/2016 11:33 am

(Continued)
Served:
Service Method:
Email:
Service Date:
Address:
Phone:
Representing:
Gerald L. Shargel
Email
sfarber@winston.com
5/2/2016
Served:
Service Method:
Email:
Service Date:
Address:
Phone:
Representing:
Kevin R. Steele
Email
ksteele@montcopa.org
5/2/2016
Served:
Service Method:
Email:
Service Date:
Address:
Phone:
Representing:
Robert Martin Falin

Email
rfalin@montcopa.org
5/2/2016
Served:
Service Method:
Email:
Service Date:
Address:
Robert Martin Falin

eService
rfalin@montcopa.org
Phone:
Representing:
Served:
Service Method:
Email:
Service Date:
Address:
Phone:
Representing:
PACFile 1001
212-294-2637
610-278-3098
Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
610-278-3102
Montgomery County Courthouse

P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404-0311
610-278-3104
Ross Mitchell Kramer
Email
sfarber@winston.com
5/2/2016
-Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane
Page 2 of 3
Print Date: 5/2/2016 11:33 am

(Continued)
Courtesy Copy
Stan J. Caterbone
Email
5/2/2016
Served:
Service Method:
Email:
Service Date:
Address:
Phone:
Pro Se:
717-669-2163
Amicus Stan J. Caterbone
/s/
(Signature of Person Serving)
Person Serving:
Attorney Registration No:
Law Firm:
Address:
PACFile 1001
Page 3 of 3
Print Date: 5/2/2016 11:33 am
The Unified JUDICIAL

SYSTEM of PENNSYLVANIA
WEB PORTAL
PACFile
Summary Report
Report Date: 05/02/2016
Submission Status: Not Submitted
Filing Package
Tracking Number: WSPRED00082210
Description: Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. ED
Filing Type: Ancillary

Total Fees Due:
Pre-Submission Status
X Select Cases
X Establish the Counsel
X Final Verification
X Select Filing Type

X Upload Filing Documents
Establish the Participants

X Record Service
Case Information
Intermediate Court Cases
Docket Number: 1164 EDA 2016 (Lead)
Case Status: Active
Case Caption: Com. v. Kane, K.

Event Track: Appeal
Program Status:
Filers
Filer Name:
Role:
IFP Status:
Counsel:
Current Filings in Progress

Filing Name: Amicus Curiae Brief
Required: Yes
Document Name: Amicus Curiae Brief.pdf
Upload Date/Time: 5/2/2016 11:19AM
PACFile 2100
Filing Fee: $0.00
Printed: 5/2/2016 11:32:11AM

Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance, Registered in the State of Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

EASTERN DISTRICT
IN RE:
Case NO. 1164 EDA 2016
Montgomery Court Case No.

Docket No. 8423-15:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
v.
KATHLEEN KANE
:
:
AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF KATHLEEN KANE'S (ATTORNEY GENERAL)

MOTION TO QUASH BASED ON SELECTIVE AND VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION
Media Group, as Movant, to file an Amicus in the above captioned case.
The Movant has an interest in this case as also being a victim of SELECTIVE AND
VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Lancaster County
District Attorney's Office dating back to the myriad of prosecutions by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania in 1987, 2005, and 2006 while a resident of the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Most of which have been dismissed without any convictions, most without any trials, which according
to law are false arrests and false imprisonments. The MOVANT was a Federal Whistleblower in the
United States v. International Signal and Control, Plc., case of 1991.
This amicus provides a voice for the Movant as well as providing another perspective and
opinion that should benefit the courts; the parties; and the public-at-large. The matters presented in
this amicus have a direct relevancy in the disposition of this case as it does in the Attorney General's
(Kathleen Kane) fight to restore integrity and equity to the Judicial System of Pennsylvania, which
affects all of the residents of the COMMONWEALTH. The
Attorney General has been quoted as
saying she is in a battle with the 'old boys' network' of Pennsylvania and the MOVANT has written
extensively about this same select group over the years beginning in 1998. In an interview with
Brian Taff of WPVI on February 16, 2016 the Attorney General is quoted as saying Everybody
SuperiorSTATE,
LOCAL,
Court 1164
& FEDERAL
Amicus re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page
601
1 of
of48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
November
April 28,
13, 2016

makes mistakes. I knew there was a good old boy network, everyone does. I had no idea
how deep and how powerful that network actually ran. The fact that I took it on and I
wasn't silent about it and that I am determined to tear that down, I think that's what my
legacy will show.
In a 1998 narrative the MOVANT wrote the following This story was perpetuated
through a gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious wrongdoing by both the law
enforcement community of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as
well as community leaders. A process that continues to obstruct Stan Caterbone's rights
for justice. It's mannerisms reach into the inner soul of political and judicial corruption. All
in the name of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the status quo of the "Good Ole
Boy's" club of Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping it's disclosure from
escaping beyond the confines of "Pandora's Box". It's a tenure of power that evolved from
the days of this country's earliest settlers, but an evolution that has somewhere strayed
away from the intent of our constitution; with total disregard for the law, in total
disrespect for the Constitution, and void of many of our civil liberties. This atrocity,
like the Lambert case, would have made our founding forefathers revel in disgust and
bellow in despair. In fact, their spirits and energies probably are!
In 2009 Opednews.com printed the narrative in full and the MOVANT wishes this said
court to consider it's content in it's final deliberations in support of dismissing all prosecutions
against the Attorney General of Pennsylvania. In addition attached are supporting documents
to advanced the credibility and integrity of the MOVANT.
These documents are attached as
EXHIBITS.
Diary: Lancaster County, The CIA, and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control,
http://www.opednews.com/populum/diarypagem.php?f=Lancaster-County-TheCIA-by-Stan-Caterbone-091125-169.html
In addition the MOVANT wrote to the ATTORNEY GENERAL on November 12, 2015 and
stated the following Back in 1998 I had a meeting with an NSA (National Security
Agency, Ft. Meade, Md) operative in a parking lot of a former car dealer in York, PA. I
had just attended a job fair and he approached me as I was about to get into my car.
He introduced himself as being from the NSA and I questioned him about why they
would not leave me alone. His response was "It is not US (NSA) it's the Good Ole
Boys". I also have a huge problem with modified, stolen, and planted documents. We
parted ways in an amicable fashion.
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page
602
2 of
of48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016
The ATTORNEY GENERAL returned a letter the following day that stated Dear Mr.
Caterbone, Thank You for your correspondence to the Office of Attorney General, we
will keep your information in our files. These are attached as EXHIBITS.
Date: April 28, 2016
/S/
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
(717) 669-2163
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page
603
3 of
of48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

___________________________________________________
HAD LANCASTER COUNTY (Pennsylvania) LOST IT'S SOVEREIGNTY BEFORE IT LOST
IT'S SOUL?1
Authored in May of 1998
"Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or
strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope. And crossing each
other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a
current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression.".
by Robert F Kennedy
In 1987 This Plaintiff (Stan J. Caterbone) Had Unjustly Lost His Freedoms, His Rights, And His
Pursuit Of Life, Liberty And Justice.
The following report (most identities purposely omitted from this version) is an amazingly true
and factual account of an extraordinarily bizarre tragedy that has turned one man's life into an
eleven (11)2 year free fall into "Dante's Hell".
On the surface, this is a story of a victim (Stan J. Caterbone) struggling to seek the truth, but
in reality, the evidence will conclude that this is a victim, literally, held hostage by virtue of his
truth. Later, the preponderance of evidence that Stan Caterbone has amassed and his
obsession for meticulously documenting his ordeal might seem eccentric, yet his demonstrated
ability to react to events before they unfold appears mystical. And this was his manner in which
he tactfully defended and protected his life. It is these actions that have painted the landscape
with a dire vengeance for his ruin. His actions will ultimately serve to protect, preserve, and
foster the truth of his story, incriminating the culpability of his many perpetrators, while at the
same time being twisted and tainted in a relentless manner to attack his credibility.
This is a story of a human being endearing for his rights, living in fear of his life, and the
remedial actions required for the truth to set him free. A victim (Stan J. Caterbone) forever
believing in his accomplishments and his visions, yet forced to adhere to a life of their
diversions. Fatefully, ten years after being taken as a "political hostage", with the aid of
numerous arrests and false imprisonment's conveniently falling short convictions, a Federal
Judge, Judge Stuart Dalzall, of the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania, opened a "Pandora's
Box" into the true colors of the inner workings and politics of ultra conservative Lancaster
County, Pennsylvania, a supposedly "God's" country. His findings reeled a dramatic and
emotional response from the Lancaster County community that was akin to the assassination of
1
2
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page
604
4 of
of48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

JFK. A community where "obstructions of justice" strikes a startling and stark contrast to the
image it so desperately embraces. A community proud of it's "tough on crime" judges, a
community of "plain folks" and Amish, and a community settled in a beautiful landscape
abundant in an agricultural bounty. This is not a community of compromising integrity. Or so it
has been perceived.
Judge Dalzall's extremely controversial findings were responsible for Pennsylvania's own
crafting of the "Laurie Bill", the retaliation by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania intended to
curb the Federal Courts interference within the respective state's own jurisdictions and
proceedings. Or was it a political maneuver to close the lid on "Pandora's Box"? The
Pennsylvania Attorney General and the Lancaster County District Attorney have both thrown all
their might and all their muscle at turning the tides of Judge Dalzall's findings. This story and
Stan Caterbone's rights have been violated and abused by some of the very same principals
that were responsible for Judge Dalzall's unsettling revelations. Lancaster County prosecutors
were found to have engaged in one of the grossest acts of prosecutorial misconduct "found in
the English speaking language", which allegedly occurred in this now famous Lisa Michelle
Lambert case, a murder trial which began in the summer of 1992. Subsequently, it is now in
the midst of a treacherous appeal process convened by Judge Dalzall. And if so, by fate, in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the home of the "Freedom Fighters".
It is this public disclosure, that casts a new light and sudden hope for freedom into Stan
Caterbone's unbelievable and horrid story, that begun just four years prior to the murder of
Laurie Show. It is the decisive similarities of how both victims were subjected to a very
calculated and politically motivated attempts to "frame" and "fabricate circumstances" to obtain
the results that justified the means for illicit self-serving interests. This very same conduct,
committed by public servants, elected and enlisted to enforce the law, to which Judge Dalzell
found so appalling. Conduct, which violated the very same rights their respective offices are
commissioned to protect. Conduct, which strikes the meaning of "We The People" from our
nation's very own Constitution.
Fortunately, Stan Caterbone's story is laced with a thread of faith, a faith in God. And because
of his faith, Stan Caterbone will forever regard Lisa Michelle Lambert 3 and Laurie Show as his
little "Angels of Justice", a Godsend. An answer to his many prayers, that for the first time in
ten years provided a small glimmer of hope, and a few moments of solitude that have
materially justified his own tragic experience. The realization that the truth is that much more
believable because of the trials and tribulations of Lisa Michelle Lambert. Unfortunately, this
revelation came at the unfortunate and untimely death of Laurie. However, it just may be God's
intentions of a Higher Purpose.
3
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page
605
5 of
of48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

This story was perpetuated through a gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious
wrongdoing
by
both
the
law
enforcement
community
of Lancaster
County
and
the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as community leaders. A process that continues to

obstruct Stan Caterbone's rights for justice. It's mannerisms reach into the inner soul of
political and judicial corruption. All in the name of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the
status quo of the "Good Ole Boy's" club of Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping
it's disclosure from escaping beyond the confines of "Pandora's Box". It's a tenure of power that
evolved from the days of this country's earliest settlers, but an evolution that has somewhere
strayed away from the intent of our constitution;
with total disregard for the law, in total disrespect for the Constitution, and void of many of our
civil liberties. This atrocity, like the Lambert case, would have made our founding forefathers
revel in disgust and bellow in despair. In fact, their spirits and energies probably are!
AT ISSUE
The central issue in this story is a cover up, a cover up of mass proportions, and of perplexing
design, with national consequences. The fact of the matter is that this cover up has had
ramifications throughout this world; specifically the Middle East The cover up would be
emphatically unbelievable without the wealth of evidence, especially the recorded conversations
with Pennsylvania officials. A cover up that permeates from what will later emerge as the 4th
largest financial fraud (Billion Dollars) in the history of the United States coupled with the
covert sales of arms to Iraq. And five years after this cover up began, these same munitions
were used against our own troops in the Persian Gulf War. And of course, there are admitted
ties to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA).. And this
cover up and story, which began in June of 1987, in Lancaster County, preceded criminal
indictments by the United States Attorney General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Department of Justice and Commerce, and more. A
vast array of criminal activities conspired from the ultra conservative Lancaster County, where
God is supposedly supreme, and it's hard line approach to crime is said to be preeminent. In
June of 1987, Lancaster County was immersed in a dynamic twist of fate, with a host of players
which may never be fully identified.
The irony of this story is how Lancaster County manages the disclosure of the very same
criminal activities that this story proves that it condoned, prior to the intervention of federal
authorities. It most dramatically will prove the nature of it's integrity, or lack thereof.
International Signal & Control, (ISC) is the controversial player in this web of conspiracy. In
1987, ISC was the third largest employer in Lancaster County, a non-discrete defense
contractor. In all due respect to our beloved country, this report is in no way challenging the
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page
606
6 of
of48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

policies or the activities of the Department of Defense, or the vast agencies of the "Intelligence
Community", especially the CIA or the NSA (National Security Advisory). with regards to ISC's
foreign dealings. Trying to protect the world of malicious and evil empires is a process which
never ends, and whose players are constantly changing. And our respective intelligence
agencies are continually challenged with the task of trying to make a difference, in accordance
with protecting our national security. Unfortunately, given the nature of their discrete activities,
and given the CIA's history of avoiding congressional approval in certain situations, our current
laws are void of effectively dealing with the peripheral catastrophes of such activities that
inherently
transpire.
The
CIA
remains
immune,
while
everyone
outside
suffers
the
consequences.
The fact that the CIA, or anyone of the other intelligence community, may have been involved,
does not grant a blanket of immunity over activities which were not material to protecting our
national security. If a company provides a service to anyone in the intelligence community, our
constitution, our laws, and it's respective commercial regulatory authorities, must still have the
full sense of their jurisdiction. The intelligence community may not have the right of
intervention into the commercial enterprise, or organization, circumventing the rights of its
employees, shareholders, creditors, and customers. No United States law or statute suggests
that there is any involuntary mandate that requires any of the preceding to compromise his or
her interests in the respective enterprise for the sake of national security, or the respective
intelligence agency. There must be considerations paid to all involved for those rights and
interests that compromise such a relationship. Otherwise, the CIA could effectively gain control
of any domestic corporation it so desires, without ever owning one share of its outstanding
stock, simply by enlisting its product or services for the sake of national security. The CIA
requires a formal vehicle to enlist the aid of our domestic commercial enterprises. ISC is a
proven and unfortunate example of that.
Stan Caterbone was a shareholder of record of International Signal & Control (ISC) for the
previous four years prior to when this tragic ordeal began. Stan Caterbone was to purchase the
stock from now Republican Pennsylvania Senator Gib Armstrong, who was in the brokerage
business at the time and selling ISC stock. The stock was sold over the London Securities
Exchange, supposedly for reasons to suppress information. Stan Caterbone was interested in
the stock because of his appetite for technology, and was more curious about the business of
ISC, than anything. In fact, Stan Caterbone had never made any inference to any of the illicit
dealings with Iraq. However, the perpetrators of this story, attempt to hide behind a vale of
"national security," in an effort to find legal immunity from all wrongdoing. In accordance, the
record will prove that this is merely a smoke screen used to intimidate and obstruct Stan
Caterbone's access for due process of the law.
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page
607
7 of
of48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

The trials and tribulations of Stan Caterbone are unprecedented in terms of emotional and
psychological duress, fortunately his indestructible faith in God, and his enduring belief in
himself and the truth, endures his life. There was one attempt on the his life, days within the
public disclosure of the CIA's involvement with the local Lancaster County defense contractor
(ISC), which Ted Kopel reported on ABC News Nightline, on May 23, 1991, 4 years after the
initial cover up began. This story will depict a series of systematic and strategic offensive
attacks upon Stan Caterbone and his businesses that will result failed business enterprises, and
a Hollywood motion picture, deserted. An impeccable professional reputation and a flawless
credit rating purposely sabotaged. Financial opportunities, that in 1987, were almost impossible
to extrapolate, Vast financial opportunities and aspirations forever a part of history. This
horrendous Crime was perpetrated for the interest of a cover up, further protecting the corrupt
enterprises of Lancaster County's International Signal & Control (ISC). A quest for justice that
polarized every relationship Stan Caterbone maintained, in Lancaster County and beyond,
including friends and family. This story demonstrates a methodology of his perpetrators for
keeping Stan Caterbone "quarantined" from justice and public disclosure, through a malicious
means of "credibility" proponents, and horrendously deceptive tactics. Financial motives
prominently displayed in the hands of all of the perpetrators, which absolves the burden for a
traditional conspiracy.
The emotional response to the truth of this story is compelling, to say the least. Subsequently,
the startling keen sense of perception that Stan Caterbone had demonstrated is even more
intriguing. It is this extraordinary quality that is responsible for saving his life, while yet at the
same time providing his perpetrators with an alibi and a vehicle for discrediting his startling
allegations and his story. This story embellishes a dichotomy of perception that had Hollywood
producers from his film project call his work genius, while his perpetrators from the Lancaster
County Community conveniently and maliciously labeling him as "insane" and "emotionally
disturbed."
THE LANDSCAPE
The perplexing question of Stan Caterbone's intelligence, or lack thereof, is best analyzed as a
question of perception. However it terms of the legal consequences of the activities contained
herein, they are of little if any relevancy. The fact of the matter is that the "mental deficiencies"
have very little relevancy to this story, other than serving as a means to discredit Stan
Caterbone, a vehicle to facilitate the cover up, and a blanket of immunity for all of the
perpetrators.
The heart of Stan Caterbone's legal dogma is best described as follows: If a person, is
perceived to have a "mental deficiency"; yet whose actions and decisions are always proven to
be instinctually and amazingly prudent, always abiding within the law, and in the best interest
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page
608
8 of
of48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

of his affairs, what rights and protection do the laws afford him from persons abusing that
perception, in order to yield political and financial rewards, as a direct consequence of his
demise? Furthermore, how does the law protect his rights, if any and all malicious acts against
Stan Caterbone, are constantly and immediately disregarded because he is perceived to not to
be "credible"? As this story unfolds, these questions will become even more troubling and
appalling. Although Stan Caterbone could never describe the pain of his trauma, he would often
say that the closest situation that may compare is that of a woman being continuously raped,
night after night, helplessly praying for relief, struggling to free herself from her captor, all with
no avail. He would call it as being "brain f------".
Stan Caterbone, coming from the lower middle class of Lancaster City, was only 29 years old
when this tragedy began. Coming from a broken home, he was the third of six boys. While at a
very young age, he would help his mother run a dry cleaning business, in an amazing similarity
like Lisa Michelle Lambert, he had also nursed his mother during bouts of depression. While in
high school, he was nursing his mother's depression, while at same time tending to his older
brothers bouts of schizophrenia. Stan Caterbone had learned to listen to the obscenities of
mental illness since he was a child. He learned to fill the shoes of his absent father in helping
his mother raise his three younger brothers.. Stan Caterbone was often called the "little old
man" because of his extraordinary maturity as a child. Stan Caterbone was determined to
break the "barrier" of the "Good Ole Boy's" club or the power elite, and had always felt a sense
of compassion for those less fortunate, and those neglected by those of material means, the
oppressed and impoverished. He had an undivided aspiration to someday make a difference to
those that could not help themselves, especially his older brother. Through his ingenious,
resourceful, and honest business approach, he was relentlessly growing his business and their
respective missions, in constant reminder of his oppression. His in depth understanding of
computer technology and his vision were his most powerful allies. Always pushing the envelope
for advanced technologies and seeking solutions for the most efficient means of his operations..
He knew that every break was going to be few and far between, he dedication himself to his
work, and married his business affairs, always embracing his projects with a passion.
In 1986, after serving on the Board of Directors for the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of
International Association of Financial Planners (IAFP), Stan Caterbone had made a large
contribution to increasing its membership and it's awareness among local professionals, as it's
vice president. In an effort to promote the organization, Stan Caterbone solicited a nationally
recognized and prominent financial planner from Washington, D.C., to be a headline speaker at
a dinner meeting. Ms. Alexandra Armstrong, one of the most nationally recognized financial
planners, often headlined in Money Magazine, attracted 100 industry professionals to the
Treadway Resort Inn. The attendance was unprecedented for the local IAFP chapter. The IAFP
is the authoring organization for certification as a financial planner. It was through the direct
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page
609
9 of
of48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

conversations with Ms. Armstrong regarding his ideas and her experience, that inspired Stan
Caterbone to pursue his ambitions of growing his own financial firm, which he began in the
following months.
Disgruntled with the conflicts of interest and the lack of incentive for various professionals to
work together in managing one's wealth, a process which lacked efficiency, this entrepreneur
founded the firm Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG as it was often called. The firm
was to incorporate a "one-stop-shopping" strategy and incorporate financial services, legal,
accounting, tax preparation, real estate, insurance, mortgage banking, and estate services all
in one firm, all residing in one location, all taking advantage of the synergistic approach toward
managing wealth. And to provide the professionals long term security and equity participation,
all participants were encouraged to purchase stock in the company. This was a new and
innovative approach that attracted a lot of attention from investors and clients, but also came a
lot of nervous twitches from competitors, especially in conservative Lancaster County.
Stan Caterbone began recruiting professionals from all of the other firms, with great success.
He had enlisted two partners whom he had worked with at IDS/American Express, to carry out
his mission, which he began after extensive market studies and his early version of the
company, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., His two partners had followed Stan Caterbone to an
independent broker dealer in Atlanta, named Financial Services Corporation, where Ms.
Alexandra Armstrong was associated, and encouraged Stan Caterbone to visit, during their
discussion after dinner. Within one year, by June of 1987, the firm had invested over $40
million for respective clients.
The company had developed satellite offices throughout Pennsylvania and in several other
states, through his unique design. This firm was causing the other financial services companies
and the local banks in Lancaster County a run for their money. The firm had built a new 20,000
square foot office building just a few miles north of the city. The firm was attracting clients,
associates, and nervous attention from, well just about everybody. Considering the capabilities,
legal, real estate, insurance, financial services, accounting, FMG was making as many enemies
as it was making friends. And Stan Caterbone always believed in the premise that it's always
better to have people talking about you, regardless of the matter, than to have no one notice
you. And they were talking. Stan Caterbone was only in his late twenties when he started this
organization,. He held several positions; he was Executive Vice President and Secretary of
Financial Management Group Ltd, and President of FMG, Advisory, Inc., which was one of the
many subsidiaries parent company owned. Stan Caterbone acted as the architect and legal
administrator of the organization, in addition to building his own financial planning clients. He
filed all of the articles of incorporation in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and submitted all
of the tedious and rigorous filings necessary for the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, which
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page610
10 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

were very demanding considering Stan Caterbone, was selling stock of his company to his
associates and investors. Stan Caterbone and his associates had also attracted some very
prominent Lancastrians's to invest in his venture, coming from various professional circles, all
infatuated with this extraordinary and intriguing concept of this young victim (Stan J.
Caterbone). All had seen it's potential for success and financial reward.
Many of his friends were involved, and in Lancaster, everyone knows everybody, so it seams..
And everyone talks, gossip is as common as jogging. This exaggerated trait of Lancaster
County, will later to come back to haunt Stan Caterbone, in a way that is most sickening. In a
way that will parallel the attitudes and sentiments in the Lisa Michelle Lambert story.
In 1987, his business affairs were reaching a point of incredible success. In fact, most of his
family and friends, have always questioned the merits of their legitimacy. He always conducted
his affairs with the presumption that time could not afford the opportunity to complete his
agenda, while at the same time disclosing his business affairs to persons that were not directly
involved.. Accomplishing his mission was first and foremost. But in Lancaster County, that was
difficult. Lancastrians's have a notion to fear what they don't know, and will always believe
what they think they know, regardless of its merits. In Lancaster County new ideas are
shunned unless coming from their own, and their own ideas are often kept close at bay,
inhibiting progress and stymieing learning. By June of 1987, a majority of his business affairs
were conducted out of the grasp of Lancaster County, his unknown activities made others
curious, especially in Lancaster County, where the blessing of the power elite was essential for
success. But, deep down inside, he knew he could never be accepted, because he did not
descend from a family of "social grace". This fueled his aspirations for success even further,
committed to prove that intelligence was innate and learned, not a direct correlation to material
wealth or social grace.
An elder attorney, Mr. Kenellm Shirk, a very respected and prominent older Lancaster attorney,
who was part of the status quo, provided one of his most cherished testimonials to his concept,
his reputation, and his mission. Mr. Shirk had petitioned the Pennsylvania Bar Association, after
meeting with Stan Caterbone, to obtain their blessing and their knowledge of any laws which
would forbid his firm to provide a satellite office in the headquarters of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., (FMG) Mr. Shirks firm was to provide a partner, and estate services to the clients
of FMG. The Pennsylvania Bar provided a lengthy recommendation that did not prohibit a
relationship, although cautioned it to proceed with careful review. The fact that the very young
and unknown Stan Caterbone could attract an elder, conservative Lancaster County attorney to
associate with his firm was an encouraging sign of respect. Ironically, Mr. Shirk is the father of
Roy Shirk Jr., Lisa Michelle Lambert's first attorney who represented her during trial of 1992,
the proceeding which was the center of Judge Dalzall's controversial and appalling findings.
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page611
11 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

Stan Caterbone prided himself on his entrepreneurship, and after building the foundation for
FMG, he set out to take advantage of its resources and it's synergism.
By June of 1987, Stan Caterbone had developed a fairly substantial mortgage banking
relationship with a Houston, Texas banker. That operation was capable of providing lending to
potential developers and businesses in the range of $ 3 million to $100 million. And the lending
packages were as competitive if not more competitive than the local lending institutions of
Lancaster County, capable with even higher lending limits. In a matter of months of securing
this relationship, Stan Caterbone and his partner were evaluating deals from Pennsylvania, New
Jersey, New York, Florida, and as far away as California.
There was a uniqueness to his capabilities that was very appealing to potential borrowers.
Because of the vast array of services of FMG, potential developers had the opportunity to
obtain both debt and equity financing through his companies. In plain terms, most shopping
centers raised capital by raising funds through investors coupled with a mortgage. This gave
potential developers one place to "take down the deal" rather than dealing with many other
professionals at the same time. It was a much more efficient process for all. Stan Caterbone
was capable of providing a mortgage, while at the same time selling shares in a shopping
center through it's vast client base of investors at FMG. This also gave Stan Caterbone a
formidable presence into the venture capital markets, by way of his strong ability to raise
capital through his vast portfolio of clients of FMG. And this was a rarity that developers and
investors loved. Investors were attracted because they could invest in equity type real estate
projects with real sense of knowing the developer, or "kicking the bricks" of the project. This
was far different than investing in a nationally syndicated project, with properties scattered all
over the country, and with developers that they did not know. The synergistic approach to his
organization began paying dividends by developing other peripheral markets and businesses.
Given the complex nature of Stan Caterbone's design of FMG, internal struggles within the
organization readily became the challenge. Orchestrating the relationships among all of the
different professionals, and trying to adhere to the interests of the clients, the professionals
and of the firm, FMG, managing the daily activities required immense thought and prudence on
the part of the principals. Of, course, Stan Caterbone assumed honesty and integrity to be a
given. And for most it was. However there were times when the senior partner engaged in
tactical rights of power.
In the later part of 1986, after Stan Caterbone had developed FMG to the point where it's
future was on stable grounds, his two partners conveniently attempted to circumvent his
position and regain control of his stock and the firm. In fact, after Stan Caterbone refused to
collaborate on a scheme to "set up" his other partner, the remaining two partners began to
attempt to regain Stan Caterbone's control. Through intimidating techniques, the partners
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page612
12 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

began to attack his presence. Stan Caterbone became agitated, especially because he played
the lead role and was responsible for the formation of the company, methodically designing and
developing its foundation, with great success. And now after the company was beyond it's point
of greatest risk, due to in large part Stan Caterbone's efforts, the other two partners wanted to
take advantage of his work, and "take the cream of the pie" for their own financial gain. It was
a difficult task to carry out because Stan Caterbone was the most respected of all three
partners, consistently keeping their respective policies in the best interest of the firm and of the
other associates and stockholders. In fact, most feared that the loss of control of Stan
Caterbone would ultimately lead to adverse consequences. However the two partners trued
unsuccessfully to weaken his position, and when that didn't work, they focused on weakening
Stan Caterbone, via intimidation and humiliation The coup and hostile environment caused a
state of depression for Stan Caterbone, although he kept to his daily duties and responsibilities,
accordingly, he called a client and friend who was a psychiatrist, whom he trusted and
respected. It was easy access to a professional, yet on a very informal basis. Because Stan
Caterbone had a family history of "mental deficiencies", he wanted to seek the proper help.
The psychiatrist had diagnosed Stan Caterbone as having Bi Polar Mood disorder. The
psychiatrist had quickly discounted any correlation between the current state of affairs, and his
partner's abuse. The psychiatrist rationale was that "because the startup of the company was
so successful in such a short period of time" , and his demonstrated intelligence and creativity,
Stan Caterbone must have been in a state of mania, and of course now, was subsiding in a
state of depression, the typical cycle for manic depressants. Stan Caterbone complied with the
psychiatrist. And after refusing to sell out to his partners, vowed to regain his business and
rescind any efforts to give up his claim to his accomplishments. The depression soon faded.
Stan Caterbone never disclosed the fact that he had sought help to anyone other than family
members. This coup lead to Stan Caterbone's aggressive approach to grow the business, and to
posture himself in projects that would ultimately remain in his control, out of the influence of
his partners. Particularly of most interest was saving the mortgage banking activities and the
digital movie, which he did successfully, but apparently too successfully.
THE "DIGITAL MOVIE"
Through an act of fate, in February of 1987, Stan Caterbone found himself in a meeting with
Tony Bongiovi at Power Station studios. Through one of his partners, he reluctantly traveled to
New York to consider financing a motion picture. Stan Caterbone's own lack tolerance for the
risk associated with film investments was overshadowed by the opportunity to visit a recording
studio. Although his associate was a friend of Tony's, he was not familiar with his
accomplishments, or his work, so he thought. If nothing else, it was a weekend away from
Lancaster, and a chance to visit the Big Apple. Intriguingly, he found more than he had ever
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page613
13 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

imagined on that weekend excursion. Tony Bongiovi, a musical genius, who's credits include
one of the most recognized recording studios in the country, Power Station Studios. Tony
Bongiov produced the sound track for "Star Wars", and is responsible for the format of one of
the most successful recording artist of the 80's, Jon "Bon Jovi", his cousin. Power Station has
recorded the albums for some of the most influential artists of all time, including Diana Ross,
Madonna, The Rolling Stones, Steve Winwood, Bruce Springsteen, etc., Tony, an eccentric
genius, of Italian decent, had many talents, from music to aerospace engineering. Stan
Caterbone's associate's sister met Tony while he flew his plane into Lancaster's airport for
repairs. They dated for some time and Stan Caterbone's associate and Tony became friends,
which led Stan Caterbone to Tony's Power Station Studios.
Tony was looking to finance his new project, which was to be the first digital movie. And, given
Stan Caterbone's extreme appetite for technologies, coupled with his amazing sense of
perception, he dramatically recognized the future evolution for the technical merits of delivering
digital video and digital audio entertainment to the mass markets. By June of 1987, Stan
Caterbone was positioned as the Executive Producer, collaborating with Flatbush Films of
Hollywood California, the movie producers, entrusted with the mission of finding investors to
provide funding for the "first digital movie", and to manage the ensuing business elements it
required.
The movie was to be shot "on-location" at the Jersey shore points, mostly in Wildwood. Tony
strategically envisioned making a movie in the horror genre. There were several specific
reasons that supported this strategy. First, he determined that it was the least expensive
format to produce, we all estimated a budget of $4 million for the production and post
production. Secondly, the horror genre would compliment a very intense sound track. The
sound track was important to enhance the new digital format, and also provide the means to
introduce a new band that he had been grooming in his studio for the past several years,
"French Lick", his predecessor to "Bon Jovi". There had been bad blood between Tony and his
cousin "Bon Jovi", which resulted in legal disputes pertaining to Tony's financial interests in
Jon's success. It was an unfortunate situation considering Tony's father and Jon's father were
brothers living in the same area. It was a subject that Tony never wanted to discuss, except for
his contributions toward Jon's career.
If by another act of fate, Stan Caterbone had the privilege of meeting one of the many
superstars while working at Power Station studios. While growing up, at an early age, Stan
Caterbone would sneak up into the bedroom of his oldest brother, and start up his old General
Electric stereo phonograph and listen to his favorite album - Diana Ross and the Supremes. It
was a passion and a ritual that provided an early infatuation to music, and to Diana Ross. Stan
Caterbone was only 10 or 11 years old. And at this early age, he noticed and listened to the
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page614
14 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

annoying hiss, that conventional hiss that always seemed to overshadow the music, whether
played on an album, on the radio, 8-track tape, or cassette.
And in a mystical twist of fate, while engrossed in a project dedicated to delivering music
without that hiss (digital) - Stan Caterbone opened the door to the recording suite to pack his
bags for the journey back to Lancaster; - and there she sat, with a glowing array of beauty,
more beautiful than any picture could ever tell, Ms. Diana Ross. She was pregnant and in the
middle of a recording session, for a new album. Her assistant quickly demanded, in a stern and
protective voice, that we leave, and Stan Caterbone and his associate replied "this is our
makeshift bedroom, we are just gathering our belongings". Stan Caterbone walked toward
Diana Ross, who was seated near his bag, and she asked "and who are you?", Stan Caterbone
calmly replied his name and absorbed as much of her beauty as his eyes could behold before
walking out the door. The room that was his bedroom the nigh before, and suddenly transfixed
into the recording suite of Diana Ross, thinking back some twenty years earlier, one of the
many gifts that God would bestow upon him. A living memorial and reminder to his older
brother, who died on Christmas day of 1985, his best friend who taught him two of his greater
pleasures in life, Diana Ross, and listening to music. He prayed that his brother was watching
from above.
And so, the digital movie project that Stan Caterbone had embraced in 1987 had personal
significance, and he never ever doubted his instincts regarding the technical merits of the
project. Stan Caterbone's perception that the entertainment industry would deliver full length
motion pictures in a truly digital medium will later become a truly remarkable vision.
The technical merits of this project and at this particular time with respect to Stan Caterbone's
extreme sense of perception require analysis. To truly understand this time perception, some of
the attributes of digital technologies need to be fully understood. In 1987, Compact DISC (CD)
technology was only now being introduced to the commercial markets. Stan Caterbone's own
crafting of his joint venture proposals, dominated by the term "digital movie", is in itself some
4 or 5 years away. In 1987, there was very little use of the term "digital", with the exception of
research and development engineers. Stan Caterbone will, throughout the documentation of
this story, will have preceded a terminology that has literally become the root of most
technological advancements in the computer and telecommunications industries of our present
day, 10 years after Stan Caterbone's vision. Today, "digital" is found to be part of or referred to
in just about every product available in the commercial markets.
During May of 1987, Stan Caterbone had created a joint venture proposal for SONY
Entertainment, Inc., for the digital movie. After weeks of researching the current state-ofaffairs within SONY, and after his proposal was completed, SONY publicly announced their
desire to open the markets for new and emerging technologies on the cover of TIME magazine,
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page615
15 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016

another demonstrated sense of perception. It was this proposal, when delivered to one of the
Hollywood producers in Santa Monica, California, after reading a draft of the proposal she said
"you are a genius". The proposal was introduced to Tony Bongiovi at the Wildwood Boardwalk,
where many of scenes were to be shot, and he approved of the proposal and thought that it
had great merits. Tony, who wanted very to do with the business elements of his project, gave
Stan Caterbone complete authority to secure the financing of the project, with a salary as
Executive Producer, and a percentage of the profits on the back end.
After review of Stan Caterbone's research and proposal's, his vision and his passion,
unfortunately without his efforts, has come to be known as Direct Satellite System, or DSS,
which is Sony's satellite entertainment system (TV), delivering digital audio and digital video
entertainment. That technology is fast eroding at the cable industry. Stan Caterbone had his
patent research center around the PSDMS system, the Power Station Digital Movie System. And
that was in 1987, some seven years before SONY delivered his dreams. Later Stan Caterbone
would also accurately predict that the 90's would become the "Information Age" because of the
direct contributions and advancements of "digital technologies", which is directly responsible for
the development of the "INTERNET".
Stan Caterbone's obsession with his "digital movie" has proven to be one of his most
remarkable demonstrations of his keen sense of perception.
The author admitted in an affidavit in 1998 that he did not know the criminal culpability of Lisa
Michelle Lambert, and further argues that it was because of the prosecutorial misconduct and
the erroneous handling of the crime scene that the truth evaded both the prosecution and the
defense as to who actually killed Laurie Show.
_________________________________________________
Date: April 28, 2016
/S/
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
(717) 669-2163
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page616
16 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016
EXHIBIT
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page617
17 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
November 12, 2015

Ms. Kathleen Kane
Pennsylvania Attorney General
16th Floor Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Re: Old Boys Network filed in GENERAL OAG QUESTIONS November 11, 2015
November 11, 2015 7:42am
"Kane, the first woman and Democrat elected to the position of Pennsylvania's top
prosecutor, has dismissed the case as a backlash over her challenge to what she
calls the old-boys' network in Pennsylvania law enforcement." LNP, Attorney
General Kane faces trial on more charges, by the Associated Press on November 11,
2015.
Back in 1998 I had a meeting with an NSA (National Security Agency, Ft. Meade, Md)
operative in a parking lot of a former car dealer in York, PA. I had just attended a job
fair and he approached me as I was about to get into my car. He introduced himself
as being from the NSA and I questioned him about why they would not leave me
alone. His response was "It is not US (NSA) it's the Good Ole Boys". I also have
a huge problem with modified, stolen, and planted documents. We parted ways in an
amicable fashion.
Stan J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group
717-669-2163
See the enclosed as well as U.S.C.A. 15-3400 LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT APPEAL,
APPELLANT, Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
https://www.scribd.com/doc/284639091/Federal-Whistleblower-and-TargetedIndividual-of-U-S-Sponsored-Mind-Control-Executive-Summary-Updated-October12-2015
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page618
18 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page619
19 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page620
20 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016
EXHIBIT
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page621
21 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
April 20, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography

Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.
In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International Signal
and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted in 1992 for
an elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad array of weapons,
most notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at that time. I have been a
victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005.
I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned into an all-out
assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts
of personal property, extortions, intellectual property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due
process; thefts and modifications of court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed
energy devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted
victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal
action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy.
The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with
the same person who declares telepathically she is a known celebrity. Over the course of 10 years I
have been telepathic with at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate and
confirm their identities without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment and act on the
numerous formal complaints that are filed in their respective offices. Most complaints are focused on
the routine victimization's of a targeted individual including but not limited to stalking, harassment,
threats, vandalism, thefts, extortion, burglaries, false imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants
or involuntary commitments, pain and torture to the body, and most often the cause of obstruction of
justice is the computer hacking.
I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was in the U.S.
Navy after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Florida, including an affidavit motorized
and authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air force and was victim to LSD
experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.
In 2015 I filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in 1992 of the
murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her book titled
Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on Amazon.com. I
am in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
Media
re
COURT
Kathleen
Group
DOCKETS
Biography
Kane Page
Page
Page
622
22
1 of 48
6811
Sunday
Wednesday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
20,
13, 2016
In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL
to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster
Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim
Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will
provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and
assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured,
and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy
weapons. I again reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented
the Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which I still do to this day.
In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT" on the
NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service financial firm,
Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for his company and
the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton
Financial. I have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to
various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and the subprime failures.
I believe that Fulton Financial needs management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning
and the performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder value.
Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is
consistent with the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking
institutions acquired by larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in
it's local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District
Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference
of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital
Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along
with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal
and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South
Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was
solicited by ISC executives for professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of
RICO Civil Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot. We also
proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and Lancaster
Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is finally under
construction with a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after submission of
an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief Executive Officer of
the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such
organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative,
Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope, People to
People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric
Center, and numerous others.
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
Media
re
COURT
Kathleen
Group
DOCKETS
Biography
Kane Page
Page
Page
623
23
2 of 48
6811
Sunday
Wednesday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
20,
13, 2016
In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an emphasis
on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the fight against
electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to address the
convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those
creating, promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless networks.
In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of the
AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the company
wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading project that
lasted until 2004 with success.
In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as
the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was developed in
conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of Downtown
Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt & Shand building.
In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the effects
of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the U.S. Sponsored Y2K
symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K Subcommittee and Senator
William Bennett.
In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization
promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding
for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention
Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based charities.
The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit organizations, faith based
initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational support for the prevention of suicide and to bring
awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was controller of
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to computerized their
accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided consulting for the
computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was
retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the Informations Technologies of the Jay
Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West
Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies
hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based
real time networking system throughout the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees
some 500 employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving the
company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was
facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were responsible for
implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human
resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and
negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since
it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County
demanded a complete accounting of the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans
it was holding. We essentially revamped the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an
increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and record revenues.
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
Media
re
COURT
Kathleen
Group
DOCKETS
Biography
Kane Page
Page
Page
624
24
3 of 48
6811
Sunday
Wednesday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
20,
13, 2016
In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program, which
was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To give
specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively
communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific, technical,
and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State
Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled
to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with
scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments technology think
tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article Escaping the Unix
Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC, then one of the leading
publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you
call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving
telecommunications.
In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic
companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial
companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services
and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology
(NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the
Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore
Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R,
Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a
major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications for
the internet and is often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had
arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly.
We had brokered a deal and the executives from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to
discuss the deal and perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield
Industrial Park.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive producer
of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the
first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the
Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula
of the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry
featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead
patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony
Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station
Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon
Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper,
Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station
Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was
released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had
developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the Digital
Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization
of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with the
release of the Digital Movie.
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
Media
re
COURT
Kathleen
Group
DOCKETS
Biography
Kane Page
Page
Page
625
25
4 of 48
6811
Sunday
Wednesday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
20,
13, 2016
I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the
technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station
Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a
compact disc.
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major
banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars.
Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across
the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both
debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private placements,
and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood,
California to secure financing of their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North
Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the
midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and
discussions with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were
quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of
other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High
Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We
were constantly told that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services organization
comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase
program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had
financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services,
tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one
year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and our
advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees from the
other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4
million.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting departments.
(See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant on the team
scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of video taping the
camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting departments for
teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa
Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues
most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino
was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players
Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp,
while we were at a Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article
about our camp and associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices.
Actually, that was the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the
country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants,
with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a
professional production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video.
The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys,
had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he looked
forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
Media
re
COURT
Kathleen
Group
DOCKETS
Biography
Kane Page
Page
Page
626
26
5 of 48
6811
Sunday
Wednesday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
20,
13, 2016
In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times.
We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms.
Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals
attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong
discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most
effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers,
accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has
become evident that financial planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us
from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi Group (the
largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help advise on the future
of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the investment industry at large. Mr.
Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified
Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in delivering Fee Based Financial
Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment community and mainstream investors.
That concept is now widely held by most investment advisers.
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
Media
re
COURT
Kathleen
Group
DOCKETS
Biography
Kane Page
Page
Page
627
27
6 of 48
6811
Sunday
Wednesday,
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
20,
13, 2016
EXHIBIT
Superior STATE,
Superior
LOCAL,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
FEDERAL
Amicus
Amicus
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
Kane Page
Page628
28 of 48
811
Sunday
Thursday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 28,
13, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
April 16, 2016
My Story of Victimization for Derrick Robinson's Document to the FBI

In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International
Signal and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted in
1992 for an elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad array of
weapons, most notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at that time. I have
been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons
since 2005. I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned
into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; hacking of all electronic devices;
vandilism and thefts of personal property, extortions, intellectual property violations, obstruction of
justice; violations of due process; thefts and modifications of court documents; and pain and torture
through the use of directed energy devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency
electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began
simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster
County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This assault began after the handlers remotely
trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most
other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with the same person who declares
telepathically she is a known celebrity. Over the course of 10 years I have been telepathic with at least
20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate and confirm their identities without
success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment and act on the numerous formal complaints that are
filed in their respective offices. Most complaints are focused on the routine victimization's of a targeted
individual including but not limited to stalking, harassment, threats, vandalism, thefts, extortion,
burglaries, false imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants or involuntary commitments, pain
and torture to the body, and most often the cause of obstruction of justice is the computer hacking.
I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was in the
U.S. Navy after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Florida, including an affidavit
motorized and authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air force and was
victim to LSD experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Amicus
and
Amicus
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Individual
629
291of
of48
811
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
In 2015 I filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in 1992 of
the murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her book titled
Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on Amazon.com. I
am in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT
BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of
Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of
Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for
years. The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by
surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research
subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and
directed energy weapons. I again reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015
and frequented the Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which I still do to this
day.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District
Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania. These litigations included violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust
violations, and interference of contracts relating to several business interests, harassment,
extortion, fraud, etc.,. . Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies,
Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along
with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of
International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export
violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates back to 1987. In
1987 I microfiched some 10,000 pages of documents that prove this story without any doubt.
I also have recorded conversations of persons and government officials.
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Amicus
and
Amicus
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Individual
630
302of
of48
811
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Affidavit
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
631
3113of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
632
3224of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
633
3335of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
! "
"
$% &
!
" #
%
"&#
(
'
!
(
,
"
"
")
"
""
-
)
!
! "
!
'
%
" !
"
!
)
+
!
" *
"
"
,
,
,
*
%
*
(
%
!
/"0
1
1 ,
"
"
4
!
"
"
!
!
#
.
.
&,,0
%
1 ,
2"3
!
)
** ! "
&,,..$/
&,,
%
&,,
%
&
, "
"
00
"
!,
"
6
7
7 , !
&,,-
8,
:
(
$;$
"2
! " ,
, ,
** !
;
5
$
!
&,,@
,
.
&<;=
>
1
9
,
&,,=
$
,
>
A
1 B3
.+
&,,=
1 B3
2
>
%
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
634
3446of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
<
1
1
* "
!
"
C#
"$
"
<
*
&, ,
24
#9
; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%
&,,0 4
! %3
"
"
!
&,,
%
!
4
'
5
4
D
%
%
"
""
,! "
0 =
0 =9
9
00&9 00
:
9
&,,-
&, , $
!
%
!
D
%
%
=
F
!
))
+
/4
),
"
0 =
/
$
G
3
%
00
3
3
"
%#
$
$
&, ,
&,,4
!- "
.
&,,@
,
*
&,,<
E
&,,
-) !
/ 4
24
/
$
D
&, ,
D
$
&,,-
&,,0
%
D
!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D
$
A
8F
$
%
;
D
.
%
&,,3
E
$
*
00=; 00
$
5
! 7
0 =
00
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
635
3557of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
)
A
24
$;$
00
(F
&
%
B
5
00 9
" * <
00=( 00 9
:#
> ) "" ""

$
;3
#, " !
&,,-
"
"
"
0 =
&, ,
/
.
$
B
3
3
=
0 =
) "
.
&,,1
0 =
24
" "
3
"
&,,@
" E
""
B
$
<
&,,1
.
&,,-
,-(&&
2
=
@,
"
&,
3
&,,!
&,,@
&,,@
0 =
@, 1
&,,@
9
!
@,
#" !,
0 =
" "1 ,
"
"*
":
" E
F
&,,-
!
B
/
!
"
00=( 00 9
B
:
9
$
'
.
&,,1
9
0 =
&, ,
/
.
00 9
/
&,,9
&,
( "
!
.
00
$
!
&, ,
F
3
7
8
!
&,,
&, ,
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
636
3668of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
&
, * "
&&
*#
"
&:
;!
&<
:
%
$
&, ,
$
&,,-
!-
,
5
%
"
>
$
$
< !-
24
? "
;
>
&,,0
B
&,,%
(
$
&, ,
&-
A
.+ $
&@
! :
&,,$
: , *
&, ,
* @
&,,@
"
E
3
&,,
"
&,,0
7 "!
7 "
0 =
*
&=
) "
":
)"
&,,@
"
&
&0
!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,
00
:,
!6
"
"
" .
9 &,,0
0 = "&#
, *
&,,@
/
" F
0 =
;A
0 =
F
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
637
3779of
of
of48
811
27
29
0 =
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016

3
"
+
$
1
$
.
0 =
I $
!
0 =
.
$
"2
'
+$;F
D
"$
&,;&,
3
A
00
'
$ 24
"1E1# $
K
E
A
00&
>
L
F
F
B
F
+
0=,K
A
$
$
1
+
>
1
$
>
B
!
3
F
1
00
) % 3
&,,-
!
>
! A !
00,K
1 B3
>
F
F
& 1
F
8
! 4
'
A
! 4
A
0=,K
F
00,K
0 ,K
0<,K
3
/
>
%
&,,
) %$
0@,K
0@,K
$
2!
A
D 1
"
$
0 <9 F
4
A? D!B
#
*
$
7
+
00
D 18
.
E
$
M 1
00= E
0 =
%
0 ,K
$
0 =
M
00
!
&,,9
(
9
!
1
,-(
$ !2B+EF2
(&&
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
638
38
10
8 of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
") !
"
7!
N
.
!
5
F
(
(
5
G
*
A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!
,
B
A
" " * #" !, " "
$C
* #" !, D
73
8
* 7
,
"
"
&
"
#
.
"
#(
5
7
9
'
5
%
7A
8 !
8 !
'
!
7D .2
O
% 8
'
7
'
(
(
%
%
4
K
K
M %
%
K
'
7E
(
8
"
%
'
%(
(
(
4
;
(
7
7
87
(
(
8
8
- 7 > !,
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
639
39
11
9 of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016

!
!
@
E
!
DD
@
E
!
DD
B &. @
DD
B@
. DD
")
!
"
B@
& DD
)
B@
. DD
)
*
B@
& DD
)
!
B@
$ DD
")
!
B@
DD 7
B@
E
DD
"! "
*
. @
EB& DD
!
*
. @
EB DD
")
!
& @
& B DD 6, "
1
B@
DD 5
B@
& DD
B@
DD
)
1
B@
& DD >
B@
DD ' "
!
B@
)
B@
E DD
)
*
"E

* , "
,
!
1
3
1
))
1"
"
, "
*"
"
, "
!
*
"
")
"
7
*
)
*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
, 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !
*
!"
, "
"
"
"
1 ,"
DD
*)
PPPPPPP "
>7
%#
'?
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
June 19, 2015

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP
15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.
I
&, ,
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
640
40
10
12of
of
of48
811
27
29
Don't Know When
24
$
$
Q &, , "!
I
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Samuel
P. Caterbone
Affidavit
Jr., (Father) Affidavit
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
641
41
11
13of
of
of48
811
27
29
Page 35 of 41
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
06/10/2007
Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., (Father) Affidavit
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
642
42
12
14of
of
of48
811
27
29
Page 36 of 41
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
06/10/2007
Sammy Caterbone (Brother) Affidavit
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
643
43
13
15of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
644
44
14
16of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
645
45
15
17of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
September 25, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
646
46
16
18of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
647
47
17
19of
of
of48
811
27
29
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
What is CCHR?
1 of 2
http://www.cchr.org/about-us/what-is-cchr.html
ABOUT US
VIDEOS
TRUTH ABOUT PSYCHIATRY
ALTERNATIVES
TAKE ACTION
ORDER
The Citizens Commission on

Human Rights was originally
formed in 1969 as a global
watchdog committed to
investigating and exposing human
rights violations in the field of
mental health. From its
headquarters in Los Angeles,
CCHR coordinates activities
amongst its chapters around the
world.
HOME ABOUT US WHAT IS CCHR?

SUBSCRIBE
TO CCHR NEWS
< ;
WHAT IS THE CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN

RIGHTS?
! !"
#'
FREE INFORMATION KIT

AND DVD
$$!##!
($
))
* #
!
(
Restoring Human Rights and
Dignity to the Field of Mental
Health
'#/
, #!
About Us
Accomplishments
Message from the President
Board of Advisors
)#+
'
'#/
) . )! ! / (
'!
# % ##
#!
(
//
))
! (
$ !
$( )
!
! ! #!
'
!#
)!
!
(
#!# (
))
#+
'
.
,! #
')
!
$ !
#
! (
&
! (
))
#+
0 '#/
* !
, #
.! !
)+
!. #
'
#
' )! !
#+
!#)
)
.
))/ '
.!#
.
$
# /
')
#+ )
!# # *
!#
!
(
/$
!#
!# #+ ) */
!
! ))/ ! (
( 1#/
#
#!
6# 7
#+
( ##
!#9 2 '
#!
# ))
!#0# (
$
* /
'! !
!#
# 5
'! !
3'
#!
0!
) ( 4 !#
+ % & ))
( #
# ( * '#/
!# #+ '#/
!# (
.! *+ %7&
# !,
'
$
#
# ) )/
!.!)
!#
))
)8
0
*
$ , #!.
+*
# / #
!# #
)/ #0 !(
% &
)!
)
)# (
,)
, !
#+ # !
!# * ,#!
# #
)3
# $
( ##!
!.!
#*
!# #+
!" !
$ ) !,!))!
0
$
(!
#+ !
## '
') (
,! )
' !
#+ ,
What is CCHR?
'
)!
$
( #
' !
, #! !
)
#+ # !
(! $
!#0# ( '#/
'
+ ( )) ! (
)+ !.!)
! 3'
#+
#!#+
!$ *
!
! #
$$!##!
,/
# # ) )/ #
)# !
)! !
)!$!
!. #
#!
,/
Order a Free
Citizens Commission on
Human Rights Information Kit
" #"
( ))
+,
!
$ #
& !#
) )
( ##!
/ ( '#/
#2
# !''
'
+!
#%
- ) *# '
#)
)
! !$
)) . !) ,) $
)'!
!. '
(! )
$
#!,) (
$ !
()!
, !
%2&
$( )
Leadership
#*
CCHR Financials
Mental Health Declaration
! (
$ !
$!
#(
( )) ! (
!
# *!
'#/
. #
#
!
!
!
(! )
($
# #
# ! 0
'!
)
+
' ,)! !
0
!# !
! (
CCHR
CHAPTERS WORLDWIDE
(
!
: #
Psychiatry: An Industry of
Death Museum
CCHR Global Locator
!# #'! !
$ !
'
* '
#!
(!
$/
!" !
*!
*!
+ ! !#
Stan J. Caterbone
Superior
Superior
LOCAL,
Caterbone,
STATE,
Court
CourtNo.
1164
& 8423-15
Story
FEDERAL
Targeted
Amicus
and
Amicus
Individual
Evidence
re
COURT
Kathleen
DOCKETS
of
Evidence
Kane
a TI
Targeted
Page
Page
Page
Page
Individual
648
48
18
20of
of
of48
811
27
29
.!
#+ ,)
#+
*#+ $
) ;'
#
' ,)!
,)
Sunday
Thursday,
Saturday,
Thursday,
November
April
April 16,
28,
13, 2016
11/6/2015 12:42 AM
11:28 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet
Docket Number: 1164 EDA 2016

Page 1 of 4
June 11, 2016
CAPTION
v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane
Appellant
CASE INFORMATION
Notice of Appeal
Case Status:
Active
May 19, 2016
Awaiting Appellant Paperbooks
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
Criminal Conspiracy
Other
Perjury
CONSOLIDATED CASES
RELATED CASES
Docket No / Reason
Type
1166 EDA 2016

Same Issue(s)
Related
SCHEDULED EVENT
Next Event Type: Appellant Brief Filed

Next Event Type: Appellant Reproduced Record Filed

COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Kane, Kathleen Granahan
Pro Se:
No
IFP Status:
No
Attorney:
Minora, Amil Michael
Minora, Minora, Colbassani, Krowiak, Mattioli & Munley
Law Firm:
Address:
700 Vine St.
Scranton, PA 18510
Phone No:
(570) 961-1616
Fax No: (570) 963-1691
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Attorney:
Address:
Shargel, Gerald L.
Winston & Strawn, LLP
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
(212) 294-2637
Fax No: (212) 294-4700
Kramer, Ross Mitchell

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any
liability November 13, 2016
DOCKETS
Page 701 of
811
Sunday
11:28 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 2 of 4
June 11, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Appellant
Pro Se:
No
IFP Status:
No
Attorney:
Farber, Seth C.
Winston & Strawn, L.L.P.
Law Firm:
Address:
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Phone No:
(212) 294-6700
Fax No:
Amicus
Caterbone, Stan J.
Pro Se:
Yes
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Stan J. Caterbone
Address:
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Appellee
Pro Se:
No
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Steele, Kevin R.
Address:
Montgomery County District Attorney's Office
PO Box 311
Phone No:
(610) 278-3098
Fax No:
Attorney:
Law Firm:
Address:
Phone No:
Falin, Robert Martin

P.O. Box 311
Norristown, PA 19404
(610) 278-3102
Fax No: (610) 278-3841
FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
Fee Amt Receipt Dt
04/21/2016
Notice of Appeal
85.50 04/21/2016
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
2016-SPR-E-000686
85.50
Court Below:
County:
Documents Received:
Order Type:
OTN(s):
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas

Montgomery
Division:
March 28, 2016
Judicial District:
April 21, 2016
Order Entered
T6863802
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Demchick-Alloy, Wendy
Judge
Montgomery County Criminal Division

38
April 20, 2016
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
DOCKETS
Page 702 of
811
Sunday
11:28 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 3 of 4
June 11, 2016
Filed Date
Content Description
Original Record In (3) Parts

Trial Court Opinion
Testimony
Exhibit(s)
Comment: Also Applies To 1166 EDA 2016
May 19, 2016

May 19, 2016
May 19, 2016
May 19, 2016
9 Vols Filed
1 Folder Filed

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Appellee
Brief
Appellant
Brief
Due: June 28, 2016
Filed:
Reproduced Record
Due: June 28, 2016
Filed:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
April 21, 2016
April 21, 2016
Participant Type
Filed By
Appellant

May 2, 2016
May 5, 2016

Appellee
Amicus
Caterbone, Stan J.
Amicus
Caterbone, Stan J.
Other
Document Name: EOA pro se amicus

May 5, 2016
Document Name: pro se answer to quash

May 16, 2016

Appellant
Comment: Appellant's Answer to Commonwealth's Motion to Quash Apeal
May 19, 2016

Montgomery County Court of
Common Pleas
May 19, 2016
Trial Court Opinion Received

Montgomery County Court of
Common Pleas
May 19, 2016
Briefing Schedule Issued

NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
DOCKETS
Page 703 of
811
Sunday
11:28 P.M.
Appeal Docket Sheet

Page 4 of 4
June 11, 2016
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
May 24, 2016
May 25, 2016
Docketing Statement Received (Criminal)

Appellant
Filed By
Due Date: June 3, 2016
Per Curiam
NeitherCOURT
the Appellate
Office
DOCKETS
Page 704 of
811
Sunday
8:10 P.M.
StanSealed
J. Caterbone
Documents and Advanced Media Group, Pro Se Billing File

Page 1 of 3
August 4, 2016
CAPTION
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Respondent

v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane, Petitioner
CASE INFORMATION
Application for Extraordinary Relief
Case Status:
Active
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Other
RELATED CASES
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Rosenblum, Douglas Keith

Pietragallo, Gordon, Alfano, Bosick & Raspanti, LLP
Pietragallo Gordon ET AL
Philadelphia, PA 19103-3656
(215) 988-1464
Kane, Kathleen Granahan, Petitioner
No
Attorney:
Address:
Minora Minora ET AL
700 Vine St
Scranton, PA 18510-2441
(570) 961-1616
No
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Steele, Kevin R.
Address:

PO Box 311
(610) 278-3098
No
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKETS
705 of 811
Sunday
November 13, 2016
8:10 P.M.
StanSealed
J. Caterbone

Page 2 of 3
August 4, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Attorney:

P.O. Box 311
(610) 278-3102
No
Address:
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Yes
Caterbone, Stanley J., Amicus Curiae
Yes
Receive Mail:
Pro Se:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Appeal From:
Appeal Filed Below:
Docketed Date:
August 1, 2016

FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
08/01/2016
Extraordinary / Plenary Jurisdiction

Fee Amt Receipt Dt
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
65.50
Court Name:
Date of Order:
Superior
June 15, 2016
Per Curiam
Judge(s):
Referring Court:
Docket Number:
1164 & 1166 EDA 2016
Quashed
Court Below:
County:
Montgomery
Division: Montgomery County Criminal Division

Order Type:
OTN(s):
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKETS
706 of 811
Sunday
November 13, 2016
8:10 P.M.
StanSealed
J. Caterbone

Page 3 of 3
August 4, 2016
Filed Date
Content/Description
Record Remittal:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
Filed By
August 1, 2016
Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief and King's Bench

Petitioner
August 1, 2016

Comments:
Pleadings Perfected
August 1, 2016
August 2, 2016
August 3, 2016
Sealed Application to File Exhibit X Under Seal

Petitioner

Respondent
Answer and Motion to Quash Defendant's Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief
and King's...
Respondent
Comments:
... Bench
August 3, 2016
Request the Courtesy of the Court to Appear Pro Se and to File an Amicus Curaie Brief in
Support
Amicus Curiae
August 4, 2016
No Answer Letter to Application to File Amicus Brief

Respondent
August 4, 2016
Order Granting Application to File Exhibit X Under Seal
Per Curiam
Comments:
AND NOW, this 4th day of August, 2016, the Defendant's Application to Seal Exhibit X is GRANTED.
Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
August 4, 2016
Order Exited

CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Docket Number:
134 ET 2016
440 MT 2016
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the Administrative
any liability
COURT
DOCKETS
707 of 811
Sunday
November 13, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
August 4, 2016
Address: Pietragallo Gordon ET AL
(215) 988-1464
Minora Minora ET AL
700 Vine St
Phone No: (570) 961-1616
Re: Supreme Court Case No. 108 MM 2016
Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas No.'s CP-46-CR-0006239-2015 and CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Re:
CI-16-05815 Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief

Recording and Scanning of Case Is Not Readable
Dear Sirs,
I am listed as the AMICUS on both Supreme Court Case No. 108 MM 2016 and Superior
Court Case No. 1164 EDA 2016. In both of those cases I had personally appeared at the
respective Clerks office and submitted both a Request for Appearance and an Amicus Curie Brief.
On Thursday, July 21, 2016 I arrived at the Montgomery County Courthouse at approximately
8:10 am. (I have photos to document time and place). I was sitting on the bench in front of the
Clerk of Courts door at approximately 8:20 am when after seeing people walking in I entered and
proceeded to the counter. A staffer said that I could wait at the counter until they officially
opened at 8:30 am. Two or three staffers walked by and were trying to harass me. I noticed an
older gentleman with a badge kept walking around me, nothing out of the ordinary as I am
harassed everywhere I go. At 8:30 a male staffer approached and I put both copies of my
AMICUS in front of him. I told him what I was filing and he began to provide me with excuses
why they were not going to stamp my documents. The he said he had to check with someone.
He gave me the excuse that I needed permission from the Court. I had explained that I was
already listed as AMICUS on case no. 1164 EDA 2016 in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and
he had to at least stamp my copies. A female staffer walked in and started to harass. I sensed
that they were all trying to either have me arrested or cause a scene and have an involuntary
psychiatric commitment placed on me. So I left one copy on the counter and left. Of course the
usual convoy of police cruisers made their appearance on my way home.
On July 28 2016 via USPS regular mail I received an envelope containing the copy of my
AMICUS with no letter or explanation. I immediately wrote a letter, see attached, and mailed
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page
708
1 of
of20
811
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
another AMICUS to the Montgomery County Clerk of Court. Yesterday, after filing my AMICUS in
the Prothonotary Office of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which was stamped and recorded,
as seen on the enclosed docket sheet, I received the new AMICUS and the attached letter.
The letter states As previously stated we only accept filings from parties to a case unless
permission has been granted by Court Order. In the future we will not be returning your
documents unless the cost of postage is provided. The letter is signed by

Michael J. Patson, who is listed as First Deputy on the letterhead; with a cc: to
Michael Drossner, Esq..
I am only a pro se filer, however it appears to me that since my AMICUS' were both
stamped in both higher courts without incident, these incidents, to me, show a pattern of
retaliatory and harassing tactics and possibly judicial misconduct against me because I am
defending your client Kathleen Kane formally and officially in my Amicus Curiae briefs.
It is my hope that this can be of some importance to your case.
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ATTACHMENTS
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit
Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400
and 16-1149
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559; 052288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016;
Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349,
CI-06-03401
P.S. Is Kathleen Kane being treated as a Targeted Individual?
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page
709
2 of
of20
811
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016
8:40 P.M.
StanSealed
J. Caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
Documents and Advanced

Page 1 of 3
August 3, 2016
CAPTION

v.
Kathleen Granahan Kane, Petitioner
CASE INFORMATION
Application for Extraordinary Relief
Case Status:
Active
Journal Number:
Case Category:
Criminal
Case Type(s):
CONSOLIDATED CASES
Other
RELATED CASES
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Attorney:
Address:
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:

Pietragallo Gordon ET AL
(215) 988-1464
No
Attorney:
Address:
Minora Minora ET AL
700 Vine St
(570) 961-1616
No
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Attorney:
Steele, Kevin R.
Address:

PO Box 311
(610) 278-3098
No
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Neither
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the
Administrative
any liability
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
Team
DOCKETS
Page
710
3 of
of20
811
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016
8:40 P.M.
StanSealed
J. Caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File

Page 2 of 3
August 3, 2016
COUNSEL INFORMATION
Attorney:

P.O. Box 311
(610) 278-3102
No
Address:
Phone No:
Representing:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Pro Se:
Address:
1250 Fremont St
Lancaster, PA 17603
Yes
Caterbone, Stanley J., Amicus Curiae
Yes
Receive Mail:
Pro Se:
Pro Se:
IFP Status:
Appeal From:
Appeal Filed Below:
Docketed Date:
August 1, 2016

FEE INFORMATION
Fee Dt
Fee Name
08/01/2016
Extraordinary / Plenary Jurisdiction

Fee Amt Receipt Dt
Receipt No
Receipt Amt
65.50
Court Name:
Date of Order:
Superior
June 15, 2016
Per Curiam
Judge(s):
Referring Court:
Docket Number:
1164 & 1166 EDA 2016
Quashed
Court Below:
County:
Montgomery
Division: Montgomery County Criminal Division

Order Type:
OTN(s):
CP-46-CR-0006239-2015
CP-46-CR-0008423-2015
Lower Ct Judge(s):
Neither
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the
Administrative
any liability
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
Team
DOCKETS
Page
711
4 of
of20
811
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016
8:40 P.M.
StanSealed
J. Caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File

Page 3 of 3
August 3, 2016
Filed Date
Content/Description
Record Remittal:
DOCKET ENTRY
Filed Date
Participant Type
Filed By
August 1, 2016
Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief and King's Bench

Petitioner
August 1, 2016

Comments:
Pleadings Perfected
August 1, 2016
August 2, 2016
August 3, 2016
Sealed Application to File Exhibit X Under Seal

Petitioner

Respondent
Answer and Motion to Quash Defendant's Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief
and King's...
Respondent
Comments:
... Bench
August 3, 2016
Request the Courtesy of the Court to Appear Pro Se and to File an Amicus Curaie Brief in
Support
Amicus Curiae
CROSS COURT ACTIONS
Docket Number:
Docket Number:
134 ET 2016
440 MT 2016
Neither
the Appellate
Courts norPage
the
Administrative
any liability
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
Team
DOCKETS
Page
712
5 of
of20
811
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page
713
6 of
of20
811
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page
714
7 of
of20
811
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page
715
8 of
of20
811
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page
716
9 of
of20
811
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page717
10 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page718
11 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page719
12 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page720
13 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page721
14 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page722
15 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page723
16 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page724
17 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page725
18 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page726
19 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone,
Media Group,
Pro Pro
Se -Se
Misconduct?
Billing File
LETTER STATE,
LOCAL,
to Kathleen
& FEDERAL
Kane Legal
COURT
TeamDOCKETS Page
Page727
20 of 811
20
Sunday
Thursday
November
August13,
4, 2016
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Rights
Advanced
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Billing File
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
PUBLIC CORRUPTION BY THE CLERK OF COURTS re Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Summary Appeal in The Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas - October 15, 2016
FINDING OF FACTS THAT CONSTITUTE PUBLIC CORRUPTION AND A CRIMINAL
CONSPIRACY:
1. Notice of hearing by Lancaster county district attorney Craig Stedman contained a
statement regarding a finding of guilt in abstentia would result in a sentence
above and beyond that of the district magistrate.
2. Motion for continuance was recorded on September 30, 2016 5 days prior to the
hearing date.
3. I kept watching the docket from my PAeDOCKET mobile app waiting for a ruling
on the motion for continuance.
4. Well beyond the October 5, 2016 hearing date the docket always ended with the
September 30, 2016 motion for continuance.
5. There was no entry of the hearing and guilty verdict of October 5, 2016 until
today.
6. On October 13, 2016, when I was stranded in Lewistown, Pennsylvania an ORDER
was assessed.
7. I received no mail regarding the above case since the September 6, 2016
CERTIFIED NOTICE OF HEARING.
8. The staffer that I always had a problem with in the Clerk of Courts Office stalked
me on an RRTA Bus from Abbeyville Road to the Centerville Supercuts stop.
9. On October 15, 2016 I find that the OCTOBER 6, 2016 ORDER for Case No.
Summary Appeal CP-36-SA-0000247-2016 Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas is NOT ON THE COURT DOCKET.
10. On October 15, 2016 I find that there was NO ADDITIONAL PENALTY IMPOSED
from the Stan J. Caterbone Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas COURT
SUMMARY as of October 15, 2016.
11.ACCORDING TO RULES OF PROCEDURE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH Summary
Appeal CP-36-SA-0000247-2016 THE MOTION OF CONTINUANCE SHOULD HAVE
BEEN DENIED PRIOR TO OCTOBER 5, 2016 PROVIDING ME WITH THE
OPPORTUNITY TO ATTEND THE SUMMARY APPEAL!
12.On September 22, 2016 I filed a Preliminary Injunction for EMERGENCY RELIEF in
order to get a JUDGE to issue an ORDER for the prescription of pain medications
and for HUMANA Advantaged Medicare Plan to honor a claim for a therapy spa for
my bathroom. Attached was also an APPLICATION FOR IN FORMA PAUPERIS.
Case No. CI-16-08472.
13.On September 23, 2016 I filed an EXHIBIT for the same case with explicit
instructions to RECORD the Exhibit as a separate docket entry in accordance with
rules of civil procedure. The clerk put a yellow posted note on the EXHBIT and
the entire filing was still sitting on the clerk's desk. She still insisted on putting
the EXHIBIT as the last pages of the initial filing.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,CORRUPTION
STATE, & FEDERAL
- Clerk of
COURT
CourtsDOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
7291 of
of 811
83
Sunday
Monday
November
October13,
17,2016
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Rights
Advanced
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Billing File
14.Approximately one week later the case was still not listed in the Civil Case Search
of the Office of the Lancaster County Prothonotary Office. Once it was listed I
again requested that the EXHIBIT be separated as a separate docket entry and
explained among other items, it contained a TABLE OF CONTENTS for the entire
filing and that it would make it easier for both the JUDGE and the PUBLIC to
follow.
15. As of today, October 17, 2016 the EXHIBIT is still not separated from the initial
filing and nothing has been ADJUDICATED OR RULED UPON.
16. THIS IS A VIOLATION OF MY CIVIL RIGHTS AND DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW; OR
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
PUBLIC
LOCAL,CORRUPTION
STATE, & FEDERAL
- Clerk of
COURT
CourtsDOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
7302 of
of 811
83
Sunday
Monday
November
October13,
17,2016
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Rights
Advanced
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Billing File
ACTIVE COURT CASES FOR STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE LITIGANT
Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 153400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284 Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Appeal; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4641 Petition for Habeus
Corpus; Case No. 16-cv-4014 2005 Conitued Case; Case No. 16-cv-49 Chapter 11
Appeal; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650,
08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR
HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462

Complaint against Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 495 MAL 2016 Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Residents; Case No. 496 MAL 2016 Caterbone v. Lancaster City Police Dept.; Case
No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-MD-1219 Preliminary Emergency

Injunction; AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-CI-08472 Preliminary

Emergency Injunction for Pain Medications; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 0603349, CI-06-03401
PUBLIC
LOCAL,CORRUPTION
STATE, & FEDERAL
- Clerk of
COURT
CourtsDOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
7313 of
of 811
83
Sunday
Monday
November
October13,
17,2016
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
732
34of
of
of82
69
811
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October16,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
733
45of
of
of82
69
811
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October16,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

DOCKET

Traffic
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Page 1 of 2
Initiation Date: 07/28/2016
Originating Docket No: MJ-02204-TR-0001981-2016
LOTN:
Initial Issuing Authority: Janice Jimenez
Final Issuing Authority: Janice Jimenez
Arresting Agency: Lancaster Police Dept
Arresting Officer: Fisher, Michael E.
Complaint/Incident #: F 2712207-1
Case Local Number Type(s)
Case Local Number(s)
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status:
Active
Complaint Date:
Status Date
07/28/2016
Processing Status
07/28/2016
Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
03/23/2016
Awaiting Original Papers
CALENDAR EVENTS
Case Calendar
Event Type
Schedule
Start Date
Start
Time
Room
Judge Name
Schedule
Status
Summary Appeal
Hearing
11/21/2016
1:30 pm
Courtroom 5
Judge Jeffery D. Wright
Scheduled
Date Of Birth:
City/State/Zip: Lancaster, PA 17603
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Name
Defendant
CHARGES
Seq.
Orig Seq.
Grade
Statute
Statute Description
Offense Dt.
LO 285-21 D
NO PARKING-STOPPING PERMITTED
03/23/2016
OTN
Disposition
Case Event
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Sentencing Judge
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Start Date
Sentence Conditions
Guilty by Trial (Lower Court)
Defendant Was Not Present

1 / NO PARKING-STOPPING PERMITTED
Jimenez, Janice
CPCMS 9082
06/30/2016
Not Final
S
LO 285-21 D
06/30/2016
Printed: 10/15/2016
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
System of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Docket Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can
only
be provided
by the
State Police.
Moreover Page
anPage
employer
does
the
Criminal
History
Record 16,
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
734
56who
of
of
of82
69
811
83 not comply with the provisions ofSunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

DOCKET

Traffic
Name:
v.
Barry Nathan Handwerger
Page 2 of 2
Name:
Private
Supreme Court No:
Phone Number(s):
717-299-0711
Address:
Supreme Court No:
072975
Rep. Status:
(Phone)
Phone Number(s):
Zimmerman Pfannebecker ET AL
22 S Duke St
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
07/28/2016
Document Date
Filed By
Notice of Summary Appeal Filed

2
09/27/2016
Hearing Notice
09/27/2016
First Class
Handwerger, Barry Nathan

09/27/2016
First Class
Lancaster County Court

Administration

Last Payment Date: 07/28/2016
Total of Last Payment: -$49.00

Assessment
Payments
Adjustments
Non Monetary
Payments
Total
$5.00
-$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$44.00
-$44.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Costs/Fees Totals:
$49.00
-$49.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Grand Totals:
$49.00
-$49.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Defendant
Costs/Fees
Clerk of Court Auto

Fee-Filing-6593AAB1211 (Lan)
Summary Appeal Filing - 6444AB1211
(Lancaster)
** - Indicates assessment is subrogated
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/15/2016
only
be provided
by the
State Police.
Moreover Page
anPage
employer
does
the
Criminal
History
Record 16,
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
735
67who
of
of
of82
69
811
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

Court Summary
DOB: 07/15/1958
Lancaster, PA 17603
Aliases:
Active
Dauphin
CP-22-MD-0000090-2007
Arrest Dt:
Last Action:
Next Action:
Lancaster
CP-36-MD-0000006-2007
Arrest Dt:
Last Action:
Next Action:
CP-36-MD-0000051-2007
Arrest Dt:
Last Action:
Next Action:
CP-36-MD-0000055-2007
Arrest Dt:
Last Action:
Next Action:
CP-36-MD-0001108-2015
Arrest Dt:
Last Action:
Next Action:
Closed
Dauphin
CP-22-MD-0000513-2006
Arrest Dt:
Lancaster
CP-36-CR-0002843-2006
Arrest Dt:
Seq No
Sentence Dt.
CPCMS 3541
Proc Status: Awaiting Disposition

Trial Dt:
Legacy No:
Last Action Date:
Next Action Date:
DC No:
Proc Status: Awaiting Change of Venue Disp

Trial Dt:
Legacy No:
Last Action Date:
Next Action Date:
DC No:
Proc Status: Awaiting Change of Venue Disp

Trial Dt:
Legacy No:
Last Action Date:
Next Action Date:
DC No:
Proc Status: Awaiting Hearing

Trial Dt:
Legacy No:
Last Action Date:
Next Action Date:
DC No:
Proc Status: Awaiting Disposition

Trial Dt:
Legacy No:
Last Action Date:
Next Action Date:
DC No:
Proc Status: Completed

Disp Date:
DC No:

Disp Date: 12/05/2006
Grade
Statute
Sentence Type
18 2709 A7
Sex: Male
Eyes:
Hair:
Race:
Last Action Room:

Next Action Room:
OTN:
Last Action Room:
Next Action Room:
OTN:
Last Action Room:
Next Action Room:
OTN:
Last Action Room:
Next Action Room:
OTN:
Last Action Room:
Next Action Room:
OTN:
Disp Judge:
DC No:
Disp Judge: Farina, Louis J.
Description
Program Period
M3
OTN:
Disposition
Sentence Length
Harassment - Comm. Repeatedly in

Another Manner
OTN:L2600452
Charge Changed
Printed: 10/15/2016 8:16 AM
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on the court summary report. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial
data, errors or omissions on these reports. Court Summary Report information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check
which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History
Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
Please note that if the offense disposition information is blank, this only means that there is not a final disposition recorded in the Common Pleas
Criminal Court Case Management System for this offense. In such an instance, you must view the public web docket sheet of the case wherein the
offense is charged in order to determine what the most up-to-date disposition information is for the offense.
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
736
78of
of
of82
69
811
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October16,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

Court Summary
Caterbone, Stanley J. (Continued)

Closed (Continued)
Lancaster (Continued)
Seq No Statute
Sentence Dt.
Grade
Sentence Type
18 5503 A2
12/05/2006
18 3926 A4
18 2709
12/05/2006
Probation
Other
S
S
Probation

Arrest Dt: 04/05/2006
Disp Date: 06/07/2007
Def Atty: Campbell, Paul Gary - (PR)
Statute
Sentence Dt.
Grade
Sentence Type
75 3733 A
10/24/2007
Probation
Statute
OTN:K4775120
M2
M1
Make Repairs/Sell/Etc Offens Weap
Nolle Prossed
Careless Driving
Nolle Prossed
18 908 A
75 3714 A
Arrest Dt:
DC No:
Disp Judge: Cullen, James P.
Nolle Prossed
18 5104
CP-36-MD-0000879-2007
Disposition
Sentence Length
Disposition
Arrest Dt:
Description
OTN:K3913991
DUI: Gen Imp/Inc of Driving Safely 1st Off

Resist Arrest/Other Law Enforce
CP-36-MD-0000012-2007
DC No:
Disp Judge: Cullen, James P.
Description
Arrest Dt:
CPCMS 3541
Grade
75 3802 A1*
CP-36-MD-0000011-2007
Guilty
Min: 3 Month(s) Max: 3 Month(s)
Guilty
Fleeing Or Attempting To Elude
Officer
6 months
Arrest Dt:
Not Guilty
M2

Arrest Dt: 08/04/2006
Disp Date: 11/27/2007
Def Atty: Campbell, Paul Gary - (PD)
CP-36-MD-0000010-2007
Theft Of Services-Acquisition Of
Services
Harassment
Program Period
CP-36-CR-0004771-2006
Seq No
Disposition
Sentence Length
Guilty
Disorderly Conduct-Unreasonable
Noise
Other
CP-36-CR-0003179-2006
Seq No
Description
Program Period

Disp Date:
Disp Judge:

Disp Date:
Disp Judge:

Disp Date:
Disp Judge:

Disp Date:
Disp Judge:
Nolle Prossed
DC No:
OTN:
DC No:
OTN:
DC No:
OTN:
DC No:
OTN:
Printed: 10/15/2016 8:16 AM
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
737
89of
of
of82
69
811
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October16,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

Court Summary

Closed (Continued)
CP-36-MD-0000449-2008
Arrest Dt:
CP-36-SA-0000141-2005
Arrest Dt:
Seq No
1
Statute
18 2709 A3
CP-36-SA-0000159-2006
Arrest Dt:
Seq No
Statute
DC No:
OTN:
Disp Judge:
Proc Status: Sentenced/Penalty Imposed

DC No:
Disp Date: 09/28/2005
Disp Judge: Allison, Paul K.
Grade Description
S
Harassment - Course of Conduct

W/No Legitimate Purpose

DC No:
Disp Date: 04/30/2007
Disp Judge: Reinaker, Dennis E.
Grade Description
OTN:
Disposition
Guilty
OTN:
Disposition
75 3111 A
Disregard Traffic Control Device
Not Guilty
75 4703 A
Operat Veh W/O Valid Inspect
Guilty
CP-36-SA-0000160-2006
Arrest Dt:
Seq No
Statute

Disp Date: 04/30/2007
Grade
DC No:
Description
OTN:
Disposition
75 3736 A
Reckless Driving
Guilty
75 3310 A
Follow Too Closely
Guilty
CP-36-SA-0000244-2006
Arrest Dt:
Seq No
1
Statute
18 2709 A2
CP-36-SA-0000028-2007
Arrest Dt:
Seq No
Statute
18 5503 A4
18 5507 A
18 2709 A3
CP-36-SA-0000154-2007
Arrest Dt:
Seq No
1
Statute
75 1786 F
CP-36-SA-0000158-2007
Arrest Dt:
CPCMS 3541

Disp Date:

DC No:
Disp Date: 12/13/2006
Disp Judge: Perezous, Michael J.
Grade Description
S
Harassment - Follow In Public Place

DC No:
Disp Date: 04/30/2007
Grade Description
OTN:
Disposition
Guilty
OTN:
Disposition
Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi

Off
Obstruction Highways
Not Guilty
Harassment - Course of Conduct

W/No Legitimate Purpose
Nolle Prossed

Disp Date: 10/22/2007
Grade
S
Not Guilty
DC No:
Disp Judge: Georgelis, Michael A.
Description
Disposition
Oper Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp
Guilty

DC No:
Disp Date: 10/22/2007
Disp Judge: Georgelis, Michael A.
3
OTN:
OTN:
Printed: 10/15/2016 8:16 AM
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
738
910of
of
of82
69
811
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October16,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

Court Summary

Closed (Continued)
Seq No Statute
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Arrest Dt:
Seq No
Statute
Sentence Dt.
Description
Disposition
Disorderly Conduct-Unreasonable
Noise
Guilty

DC No:
Disp Date: 10/05/2016
Disp Judge: Totaro, Donald R.
Grade Description
Sentence Type
75 3322
10/05/2016
CPCMS 3541
Grade
18 5503 A2
Program Period
OTN:
Disposition
Sentence Length
Guilty
No Further Penalty
Printed: 10/15/2016 8:16 AM
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
739
10
11of
of811
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October16,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
740
11
12of
of811
82
83
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October16,
13,
17,2016
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

DOCKET

Traffic
v.
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Page 1 of 5
Initiation Date: 07/07/2016
Originating Docket No: MJ-02301-TR-0000861-2016
LOTN:
Initial Issuing Authority: Scott E. Albert
Final Issuing Authority: Scott E. Albert
Arresting Agency: East Hempfield Twp Police Dept
Arresting Officer: Keen, Christopher Michael
Complaint/Incident #: E 0007452-4
Case Local Number Type(s)
Case Local Number(s)
STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status:
Closed
Status Date
10/05/2016
Processing Status
10/05/2016
Awaiting Sentencing
07/07/2016
Awaiting Original Papers
07/07/2016
Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
Complaint Date:
05/10/2016
Sentenced/Penalty Imposed
Date Of Birth:
07/15/1958
City/State/Zip: Lancaster, PA 17603
Alias Name
Caterbone, Stanley Jay
CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Name
Defendant
CHARGES
Seq.
Orig Seq.
Grade
Statute
Statute Description
Offense Dt.
75 3322
05/09/2016
OTN
Disposition
Case Event
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Sentencing Judge
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Start Date
Sentence Conditions

1 / Vehicle Turning Left
Albert, Scott E.
Defendant Was Present

06/10/2016
Not Final
S
75 3322
06/10/2016
Guilty
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/14/2016
only
be provided
by the
State
Police.
Moreover Page
an
employer
does
the
Criminal
History
Record 16,
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Judge
Clerk
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
741
11
12
313who
of
of
of61
811
69
82
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

DOCKET

Traffic
v.
Disposition
Case Event
Page 2 of 5
Disposition Date
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Sentencing Judge
Final Disposition
Grade
Section
Start Date
Sentence Conditions
10/05/2016
Final Disposition
Guilty
1 / Vehicle Turning Left

Totaro, Donald R.
75 3322
10/05/2016
No Further Penalty
Name:
Name:
Supreme Court No:
Supreme Court No:

Rep. Status:
Phone Number(s):
ENTRIES
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
07/07/2016
Document Date
Filed By
Notice of Summary Appeal Filed

1
09/06/2016
SA Hearing Notice Sent

09/06/2016
First Class/Certified
Lancaster County District Attorney's

Office
Lancaster County District Attorney's

Office
Hand Delivered
09/06/2016
1
09/30/2016
Motion for a 30-Day Continuance

1
10/05/2016
Totaro, Donald R.
10/05/2016
Totaro, Donald R.
Guilty
2
Order - Sentence/Penalty Imposed
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/14/2016
only
be provided
by the
State
Police.
Moreover Page
an
employer
does
the
Criminal
History
Record 16,
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Judge
Clerk
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
742
12
13
414who
of
of
of61
811
69
82
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

DOCKET

Traffic
v.
ENTRIES
Document Date
Page 3 of 5
Sequence Number
CP Filed Date
Filed By
10/13/2016
Pfursich, Jacquelyn E.
10/13/2016
Court of Common Pleas - Lancaster

County
DL-21S to be Prepared
2
Penalty Assessed
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/14/2016
only
be provided
by the
State
Police.
Moreover Page
an
employer
does
the
Criminal
History
Record 16,
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Judge
Clerk
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
743
13
14
515who
of
of
of61
811
69
82
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

DOCKET

Traffic
v.
Page 4 of 5
Last Payment Date:

Total of Last Payment:

Assessment
Payments
Adjustments
Defendant
Non Monetary
Payments
Total
Costs/Fees
ATJ
$4.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$4.00
$45.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$45.00
$2.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.25
$27.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$27.50
Clerk of Court Auto Fee-Costs

6593AAB1211 (Lan)
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
Commonwealth Cost - HB627 (Act 167

of 1992)
$8.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8.55
$21.40
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21.40
DA Administration Fee 6421AB130019021 (Lan)
$25.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$25.00
DA Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211

(Lancaster)
$10.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$10.00
Emergency Medical Services (Act 45 of

1985)
$10.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$10.00
JCPS
$21.25
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21.25
$8.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8.00
Sheriff Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211

(Lancaster)
$2.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2.00
$8.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8.55
Hearing Costs
$8.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8.00
Prosecution Cost - 6411AB1211

(Lancaster)
$6.68
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$6.68
$213.18
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$213.18
Title 75, Motor Vehicle (Motor License

Fund)
$12.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$12.50
Title 75, Motor Vehicle (Motor License

Fund)
$12.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$12.50
Fines Totals:
$25.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$25.00
Grand Totals:
$238.18
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$238.18
CJES
Clerk Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211
(Lancaster)
Costs/Fees Totals:
Fines
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/14/2016
only
be provided
by the
State
Police.
Moreover Page
an
employer
does
the
Criminal
History
Record 16,
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Judge
Clerk
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
744
14
15
616who
of
of
of61
811
69
82
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File

DOCKET

Traffic
v.
Page 5 of 5
** - Indicates assessment is subrogated
CPCMS 9082
Printed: 10/14/2016
only
be provided
by the
State
Police.
Moreover Page
an
employer
does
the
Criminal
History
Record 16,
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
-Pennsylvania
Judge
Clerk
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
745
15
16
717who
of
of
of61
811
69
82
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
HISTORY OF MISCONDUCT IN THE

CLERK OF COURT OF THE
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT
OF COMMON PLEAS
___________________
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
746
17
18of
of811
82
83
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October16,
13,
17,2016
2016
Third Circuit 15-3400
Page 14 of 231
Thursday, November 19, 2015
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax
Stan J. Caterbone
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
May 7, 2006
Mr. Joseph Masse
Judicial Conduct Board
Pennsylvania Place
301 Chestnut Street
Suite 403
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Re: Complaints Status
Dear Mr. Masse;
Unfortunately, in addition to the problems with the Criminal Justice System in Lancaster
County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, I have had my legal files, materials, and evidence
stolen from me. Most of it was recently returned on April 13, 2007, however, sorting and verifying
my files has been a tedious and time-consuming effort. In addition, I have just found some
unopened mail from October of 2006, which was addressed from your office. This was some of the
files that were returned to me on April 13th. All of these matters are before the Pennsylvania
Superior Court, MDA 1463-2006 and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court 248 MAL-2007.
May I request a complete update of all of my complaints and the status, with a copy of the
Complaint cover sheet? It would be the only way that I can verify my documents, and determine if
any files are missing.
Also attached are the dockets for 21 criminal charges that have been dismissed, withdrawn,
or not guilty verdicts returned. I am sure that your office will look at my complaints in a different
manner. And, of course, I was pro se for most of these proceedings. I also have 3 criminal appeals
in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, and would most appreciate your office being as judicious and
as impartial as you can possibly be.
Remember, I am a Federal Whistle-Blower and have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that
the RICO Anti-SLAPP provision has been violated.
Respectfully,

Enclosures
PUBLIC
JUDICIAL
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CONDUCT
& FEDERAL
BOARD
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
COMPLAINT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
747
18
11
19of
of811
82
20
83
Page 1 of 28
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
November
October
October
July 16,
13,
26,
17,2016
2016
05.07.2007
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
JUDICIAL
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CONDUCT
& FEDERAL
BOARD
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
COMPLAINT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
748
19
12
20of
of811
82
20
83
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
November
October
October
July 16,
13,
26,
17,2016
2016
Page 1 of 231
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
April 26, 2007

Judicial Council
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals
United States Courthouse
601 Market Street
Philadelphia Pa 19106-1790
Re:
Future Federal Courthouse in Lancaster County
Dear Sir or Madam:

With respect to your efforts of bringing a Federal Courthouse to downtown Lancaster, I
would be remiss if I did not share this information with you. In all due respect for the Federal
Courts, I would like to caution you regarding the conduct of Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster
County Pennsylvania personnel. I assume many of whom may wish to seek employment, should
the opportunity arise.
I have had such horrendous experiences with respect to Court filings, rulings, and
procedures, I would hope that you would plan ahead to prevent the same problems from
occurring at the Federal level. Justice is the fabric or our nation, and it should be treated with
respect and honor.
Enclosed are some copies of correspondence that I would like to share with you in the
hope that when the Federal Courthouse in Lancaster is operational, there will be an opportunity
for me to conduct my litigation free from misconduct.
I look forward to your decision on a location, and seeing your efforts come to fruition.
Respectfully,

cc:
Rick Gray, Mayor of the City of Lancaster

Senator Arlen Specter
Randy Patterson, Lancaster City Director of Economic Development
U.S. Congressman Joseph Pitts
U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence Stengel
Enclosures
PUBLIC
JUDICIAL
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CONDUCT
& FEDERAL
BOARD
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
COMPLAINT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
749
20
13
21of
of811
82
20
83
Page 1 of 12
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
November
October
October
July 16,
13,
26,
17,2016
2016
04.26.2007
Page 2 of 231
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
JUDICIAL
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CONDUCT
& FEDERAL
BOARD
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
COMPLAINT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
750
21
14
22of
of811
82
20
83
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
November
October
October
July 16,
13,
26,
17,2016
2016
Page 3 of 231
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant/06-5238-200

Lancaster County Prison 625 E. King Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
Mr. Dale R. Delinger
Clerk of Courts
Lancaster, PA 17602
Re: Criminal Court Documents
December 27, 2006
Dear Mr. Delinger,
I have received your letter dated December 26, 2006, and you are confusing me. I
have reason to believe that my documents are not being filed in your office or are not
being filed in a timely manner. I have had similar problems with your staff this past year
when I personally filed court documents at the Lancaster County Courthouse.
For the above reason, I am formally requesting a copy of all documents that I have
filed since October 30th, 2006, and sent to me at the prison. I am not receiving receipts
for all of my filings. This past summer my drivers license appeal and related documents
to Penn DOT are missing from your office.
I am also formally and officially requesting a transcript of the court record for all of
my court trials and appearances, as prescribed by law. The trial of CP-36-CR-00028432006 is under appeal and CP-36-CR-0003179-2006 is now formally being challenged for
civil rights violations under 1983.
In Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 13, 76 S ct. 585, 100 L. Ed. 891 (1959) An indigent
has a Constitutional Right to Free Transcript for Appeal of Right.
I would appreciate a quick response to these matters as they are material to
my Federal litigation in United States District Court case no.s 05-cv-2288 and 06-cv4650.
PUBLIC
JUDICIAL
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CONDUCT
& FEDERAL
BOARD
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
COMPLAINT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
751
22
15
23of
of811
82
20
83
Page 2 of 12
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
November
October
October
July 16,
13,
26,
17,2016
2016
04.26.2007
Page 4 of 231
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax
Stan Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
February 21, 2007

Mr. Randall O. Wenger
Prothonotary of Lancaster County
Lancaster, PA 17602
Re: Civil Action CI-00019-07 and CI-06-02271 Court Docket
Dear Mr. Wenger:
There is a problem within your office of the way that you are recording Court Orders by Judge
Michael Georgelis on the Docket for my civil action against Fulton Bank, CI-07-00019.
On February 1, 2007, I attended a meeting in the chambers of Judge Georgelis with Fulton Bank
attorney Mr. Shawn Long. Mr. Long was submitting an ORDER for DISMISSAL of my Petition To Set
Aside The Sale of Real Estate concerning my Sheriff Sale of December 20th, 2006. The property is
located at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga. During the meeting, Mr. Long acknowledged that the
Fulton Bank RESPONSE that I received the previous day on January 31, 2007, and that he was
submitting to Judge Georgelis had not yet been recorded in the Prothonotary.
On February 2nd, 2007, via 1st class mail, I received an ORDER signed by Judge Georgelis, DENIED
with prejudice, dated FEBRUARY 1, 2007. On February 6, 2007, my REPLY to the Fulton Bank
RESPONSE was recorded.
The problem arose when I pulled up the court docket on your computer, and conveniently the
ORDER was under the date of February 6, 2007, the same day my REPLY was recorded. This definitely
deceives the fact that Judge Georgelis signed that ORDER to Fulton Banks RESPONSE DENYING my
Petition, less than one day after I received it, and prior to the time that my REPLY was filed and
recorded. Your staff explained that it took from February 1st to February 6th for the ORDER to travel
from the 4th floor to the 2nd floor, and they used the date that they received the ORDER from Judge
Georgelis office. This is illegal and wrong. You are maliciously tainting the COURT RECORD.
During the meeting of February 1, 2007, I again requested that Judge Georgelis recuse himself
from this case. Without any opportunity to support my motion, he denied my request stating that he
has been sued by many people that come before him in Court, and that if he would allow himself to be
recused, he would have 6,000 inmates requesting the same.
Aside form the fact that Judge Georgelis is a DEFENDANT in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania, case number 06-cv-4650, he also preside over the case of William A.
Clark v. James H. Guerin, Chairman and CEO of International Signal & Control (ISC) in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas in 1989. Then, my former attorney, Joseph Roda, represented Mr.
William A. Clark, a former top legal advisor to International Signal & Control.
More importantly, International Signal & Control is central to many of my Federal civil actions filed
in the U.S. District Courts in Philadelphia beginning in May of 2005, and is central to my Federal False
Claims Act civil action 06-cv-3955 filed in October of 2006.
For your information, I also enclosed a document that may shed some light as to the dire
consequences of my whistle-blowing allegations of International Signal & Control in 1987, and the vital
importance of my court actions and filings.
PUBLIC
JUDICIAL
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CONDUCT
& FEDERAL
BOARD
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
COMPLAINT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
752
23
16
24of
of811
82
20
83
Page 3 of 12
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
November
October
October
July 16,
13,
26,
17,2016
2016
04.26.2007
Page 5 of 231
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Page 2
Mr. Randall O. Wenger
February 21, 2007
May I suggest your preserve the integrity of the Courts and the Record, especially since this
matter is now before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, case number 71 MT 2007, and the Superior
Court.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Respectfully,
Stan J. Caterbone
Cc:
The Honorable Michael Georgelis

Enclosures
PUBLIC
JUDICIAL
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CONDUCT
& FEDERAL
BOARD
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
COMPLAINT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
753
24
17
25of
of811
82
20
83
Page 4 of 12
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
November
October
October
July 16,
13,
26,
17,2016
2016
04.26.2007
Page 6 of 231
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
JUDICIAL
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CONDUCT
& FEDERAL
BOARD
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
COMPLAINT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
754
25
18
26of
of811
82
20
83
Page 5 of 12
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
November
October
October
July 16,
13,
26,
17,2016
2016
04.26.2007
Page 7 of 231
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax
Stan Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
February 22, 2007

Mr. Dale R. Denlinger
Clerk of Courts of Lancaster County
Lancaster, PA 17602
Re:
Motion for Continuance of February 15, 2007

CP-36-SA-0000160-2006
CP-36-SA-0000159-2006
Dear Mr. Wenger:

There is a problem within your office of the way that you are handling my criminal proceedings.
Yesterday, I had problems with the paperwork, which has always been a problem in your office, and I
requested the status of the above continuance. I was informed, the the Motion for Continuance was
never sent up to a Judge for a Ruling.
This is unfortunate, and given the history of problems that your staff causes me, I am formally
alleging foul play and malice within the Clerk of Courts to Obstruct Justice.
Most insulting, is the allegation by The Honorable Judge Reinaker on his ORDER of January 19, 2007
which he states the following: The Court notes that Defendant has deliberately failed to properly
identify the matters which form the basis of his request by refusing to provide the accurate docket
numbers. I have always maintained that it was your office that either was providing erroneous
numbers, or your office confusing me with the wrong docket numbers.
For your information, I also enclosed a document that may shed some light as to the dire
consequences of my whistle-blowing allegations of International Signal & Control in 1987, and the vital
importance of my court actions and filings. You are hereby formally being notified of the Clerk of
Courts conduct, and its appearance of misconduct with relation to the attached filing.
May I suggest your preserve the integrity of the Courts and the Record, especially since some of
these matters are now before the Pennsylvania Superior Court.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Respectfully,
Stan J. Caterbone
Cc: Mr. Donald Totaro
The Honorable Judge Dennis E. Reinaker
PUBLIC
JUDICIAL
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CONDUCT
& FEDERAL
BOARD
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
COMPLAINT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
755
26
19
27of
of811
82
20
83
Page 6 of 12
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
November
October
October
July 16,
13,
26,
17,2016
2016
04.26.2007
Page 8 of 231
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
JUDICIAL
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CONDUCT
& FEDERAL
BOARD
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
COMPLAINT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
756
27
20
28of
of811
82
20
83
Page 7 of 12
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
November
October
October
July 16,
13,
26,
17,2016
2016
04.26.2007
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerkof
COURT
ofCourts
Courts
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
757
28
29of
of811
82
83
Sunday
Sunday
Monday
November
October
October16,
13,
17,2016
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

CRIMINAL DIVISION CLERK OF COURT
APPELLANT
:
:
:
:
Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016

:
MOTION FOR A 30-DAY CONTINUANCE

AND NOW, on this 27th day of September, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE in the above captioned case.
At about 7:00pm on
Monday September 26, 2016 a Lancaster City Police Officer appeared at the residence of
the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF, which the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF ignored. Previously the
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF has filed several complaints of misconduct and obstruction of
justice against the same said police department, including Chief Kieth Sadler and
Detective Clark Bearinger.
The APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
has made complaints of
physical abuse as well as psychological and mental abuse. The APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF

most likely suffers from Post Traumatic Syndrome Disorder from the abuse by law
enforcement; medical professionals; neighbors; residents; the
pit bull attack of June
10; and public officials that has been ongoing since blowing the whistle on International
Signal and Control, plc, or ISC in 1987. The APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF was in lagitimate
fear for his life, and has in the past survived at least 2 attempts on his life surrounding
the June 23, 1987 meeting with ISC executives, and the public disclosure by Ted Koppel
and ABC News Nightline in 1991 of the black ops program of the Central Intelligence
Agency, or CIA. There are currently 2 such cases in Pennsylvania Appellate Courts,
Superior Court Case No. 1219 MDA 2016, and Supreme Court Case No. 496 MAL 2016.
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
758
16
29
130of
8
of
of18
61
811
69
82
83
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
There are several Cases in the U.S. District Court that have been WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT PREJUDICE for reasons but not limited to computer hacking; harassment;
assaults;
vandalism
to
real
property;
and
threats
of
violence
against
the
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF. The most recent cases are 16-cv-04641 and 16-cv-04014. At

approximately 8:00 pm on Monday evening the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF, under duress,
fled the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to take refuge in Plantation, Florida with
family.
The APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN ASSAULTED WITH PHYSICAL FORCE BY

OFFICERS OF THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS
IN
THE
PAST
AND
WAS
NOT
GOING
TO
LET
IT
HAPPEN
AGAIN.
The
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF requests the court to grant this continuance while the

APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF seeks safe harbor and considers his options for redress and
relief by the courts.
Again, the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF had to file a Preliminary Injunction for

Emergency Relief in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas for intervention and
relief in regards to medical professionals refusing to continue the prescriptions of pain
medications for his daily suffering of acute pain, which in itself is a form of torture.
Earlier that day the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF visited the Lancaster County Prothonotary
and
was
finally
given
the
case
no.,
which
is
CI-16-08472.
On
Friday,
the
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF filed an exhibit containing audio recordings that are damaging

to the Lancaster City Police Department and the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF suspects that
another fabricated 302 mental health warrant may be filed in rataliation and in an effort
to again discredit the APPELANT'S ACCUSATIONS AND OBSTRUCT THE APPELANT'S
claims not being litigated in both state and federal courts.
The APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF has also just been subjected to extortion of real

monies totaling some $6,500 in recent weeks when that sum of monies in cash had to
be used to purchase a 2004 Hyundai Santa Fe after spending several weeks riding a
bike
and
using
the
Red
Rose
Transit
Authority.
On
August
3,
2016
the
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF received a phone call from a Loan Representative of Huntington Bank,

Columbus, Ohio concerning the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF auto loan for his 2007 Honda CRV.
The
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF as 11 phone calls back and forth up to and including yesterday, August 30,
2016. In June of 2015 the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF borrowed some $12,000 for the auto, a 100,000
mile warranty and GAP Insurance.
On December 8, 2015 the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF was rear
ended in Carlisle, Pennsylvania in a suspicious incident.
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
759
17
30
231of
9
of
of18
61
811
69
82
83
The APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF fixed all
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
repairs for a nominal cost of $300 to a minimum degree of noticeability.
On May 7, 2016 the
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF FINALLY received the payout from NATIONWIDE insurance and accepted
full liability, documented the Honda CRV as Totaled.
On May 10, 2016 three days later the
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF'S front end was demolished, again by a suspicious incident causing the
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF insurer to pay over $5,000 in repairs. In August Huntington Bank tried to
convince the APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF that payment was due for July and August, yet in July of
2016 there was not one communication from Huntington Bank. On or about August 18, 2016 the
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF gave the Huntington Bank Loan Officer a routing number and account
number to a checking account with over $9,000 in available cash to make a payment.
The
Huntington Bank Loan Officer refused to process the payment and instead, as usual KEPT
HARASSING
the
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF.
On
Sunday,
August
20,
2016
the
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF cleaned out the car in anticipation of a repossession and REFUSED

FURTHER NEGOTIONS REGARDING ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS AND HARASSMENT.
On
Sunday, August 28, 2016 another suspicious incident occurred and left the front end
severely damaged. On Monday the APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF drove the Honda CRV to a
parking garage in Harrisburg, notified Huntington Bank, the Senior Risk Management
Officer via Linkdin Messaging, and took a train home to Lancaster.
In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law,
a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to do an
unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice with intent
to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United States v. Holck, 389
F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the following:
Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an indictment
and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which attracts different
members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance
of an overall plan. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The
underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of
constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious
constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring
violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement
and protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241,
242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985,
1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
760
10
18
31
332of
of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a
performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business
or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The
defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not
one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s)
and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or
State court. http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
Where RICO laws might be applied1

Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for
their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or
retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. The RICO laws can be
alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or
corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or
against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt
to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as
a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another's speech. RICO could
be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to
References
RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December
2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya
Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregonriaa-victim-fights-back- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
761
11
19
32
433of
of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been
brought before the courts.
limitations has run out.
These laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of
The courts may also consider that the following allegations have been
proven:
1. Judicial Misconduct
2. Selective and Retaliatory Discrimination under the 1990 Disabilities Act
3. Collusion to Commit Assault and Battery in Easton, Pennsylvania
4. Using the Courts for Political Vendettas
5. Attempted Extortion of Real Monies
6. Libel and Slander
7. Collusion of COINTELPRO-LIKE Tactics with Law Enforcement
Dated September 27, 2016
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
762
12
20
33
534of
of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
ACTIVE COURT CASES FOR STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE LITIGANT
Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 153400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284 Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Appeal; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4641 Petition for Habeus
Corpus; Case No. 16-cv-4014 2005 Conitued Case; Case No. 16-cv-49 Chapter 11
Appeal; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650,
08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR
HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462

Complaint against Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 495 MAL 2016 Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Residents; Case No. 496 MAL 2016 Caterbone v. Lancaster City Police Dept.; Case
No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-MD-1219 Preliminary Emergency

Injunction; AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
CI-06-03401
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
763
13
21
34
635of
of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
EXHIBIT
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
& FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
764
14
22
35
736of
of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
&!
(((
&&"
"
!"" # $
'"
!
&
)#
!
THEY WANT TO KILL ME
,*
+
+
,
+
+
* +
+-
..................................................
"# $ ! %
& &
'
# &
(
) * $
+ $
# &
# &
%
$ !
& &
$ #
#
# ' &
&
# % #
$ , % &
$
(
- .
/
' 0& 1 ' 1
! '
'
, %
&
/ %
*
'
&
' ## ! $
*
* #
&
1
+ $
#
& 13(3 "4, #
0&
"- 410 ,0 5 ,40"(3 063 4 0713 4
))13 "4, 14- 063 0 10
"+
/
+
+ , **
+
12$
14 5 /
*
++
+ +
$/
$
' *&
& &
$ !%
&
!
&
*
$
"#
$
#
&
$ ! %
&
( $
%&
0
' &
& /!
'!
( $
& '
' %
*
) * $ +$
!
&
%& %
&
*
& %
$ / /
2!
. ) * $
$
% & ! 2
#
&
-4 0
063
4 "(3 4 "(31
8 "0 9
06 0 4
++
+ *0
+
+
+
'
%
/
+
3
+
+ / *0
'
+ +
/
'
$
+
,+
0 ,-
++
+
/ - /
"
VERY IMPORTAT - PLEASE READ THE ABOVE
DECLARATION AND STATEMENT
+/
#! $
...........6 6............
$
*! !&
!""
&!
%%%
'"
**
# $
!/
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496&MAL
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
2016
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
For
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
765
15
23
36
837of
of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
!
5
:
!#
'7
(
"
!8!
!&
"!
+(!
, ,
3 "
*
#
"!
!
!
'5
!
!
'
! #
!
!
#
*
# 4
! &
"
" ! #
(! !
* '
5
"'
!
$%
"!#
9#"
%# & "
"
#
+.
0
,
. ) (
'1
" "
#
' +(!
#
!
2 &3
!
!
"
%
!
'+
,
#
,
"
'
6
)
!
3
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496&MAL
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
2016
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
For
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
766
16
24
37
938of
of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
"
! *
! !!
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
78
'#'
(!
* "
* & ; !<
# '
(! ,
. ) (
#
'
&
9
5
&
!
#
1
"
9
!
!
*
!
"&
!
" ! &
' +>
:%
%
*
#
(! ,
, "
#
!
+(!
,
; !
'
&
!
! &
'> !
'
!
; #
#
*
'
! &
! !
' +(!
"
:: ;' <
5
& &
#
' !
# , "
#! !
'5
* *
&
'
*,
'+
#
' (!
* +
"
'
&
! &
#5
# #
#
" !
' +(! !
9
"' (!
1
,
'
'
! #' (!
" # !
"
9
"
#
!
#
'. ) (
* & ; !<
# &
; !<
*
! #'
! , *
*
#
!
"
+ =
*
+
!
+!
'
! *
5
"
,
5 &!
+
!
%
! , *
!
=
" "
'
A% ! *
B #
A% "
.
, )'
'
! *
"! !
)
!#
! " "
@ " 2
# !
&
* ! *
'
# '> !
' (! * * ! 5
! &
* &
!
"5
(!
"
! '
& !
,
! &
" (
&
! & "
!
. ,
"!
#
!
!
#
'>
! '. ) (
'
!
& " &
(!
6 %6: ;' <
(! $%
7 '#' !
. ) (
9
!
0 "
'
4
+
; #
!
#
!
"
5
'
'
" (
! !
# ' (!
"
#
"
'+
! ! #'+
,
!
!
"
& !
! #
! &
+
! ! &
,
/
##
! #
+ !
C :
""
'
5
#
! ! #
! #'+
!
, "
,
9
&
'
/!
! &
! 5
5
4 * ! ,
!
+
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496&MAL
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
2016
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
For
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
Page
PPage
Page
age767
10
17
25
38
39of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
(!
)
5
! 5
. ) (
=
' (!
! &
'
+@
##
5
!
#
'
&
" !
"
!
E! &
(!
*
!
" "
#*
)
! (
!
*
4 ! , !
'
1
'
'
%"
1
4 ,
+*
4
#
"
,
+ #
#
"
'
. ) (
! &
! &
'>
! !
#
%
"
"
+
*
&
&' +> #
'
5
# &'
&
; #
! , *
+
"
! #
*
+!
"
!#
*
"#
"
"
'
% ,
"
%
"
*
&
"5
9
!#*
!
! (
&
&
!
0
! #'
!#
'
!
!
!<
" D
!
'
* * ! 5
;
!
# *
"+
& +!
'
##
!
"
!! &
9
1
'; #
* (
; #
'
& !
! (
'
) & "
#
'
' (!
!; #
!5
!
; #
'
+>
4
! ,
,
' (!
4
5
"!
5
'
!#
& . ) (
! 'A %
! 4 " "
E5
! &
!
=
# #
'+
"
! ! &
&!
'. ) (
! *
"
4 F#
+
#
+* !
!
' (! 4, "
"!
!
!
! ! !
'>4
!9
,
,
! !
##
"" *
!
. )
4
"
!
"
+(!
!5
#
<
!
"
(!
*
5
'
#
"*D
#*
!1
& ' +(!

! !
+
"
(!
* #
"5
!
"!
&
! !
! "
(
* *'
"
* '
5
" , !
# *
#
, &
' (!
,
!
!
,
# '
'
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496&MAL
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
2016
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
For
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
Page
PPage
Page
age768
11
18
26
39
40of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
"
! !
'
5
5
3
1
+
4
&
!
, #
+ "!
=
,
* " ! ,
"
"'+
'
. ) (
9 ! "
(!
!
!
'. ) (
!
!
&
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496&MAL
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
2016
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
For
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
Page
PPage
Page
age769
12
19
27
40
41of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
**
!
$$$
'
'
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Case No.
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496&MAL
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
FEDERAL
Appeal
- Clerk
2016
- Clerk
Judge
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
For
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
Page
PPage
Page
age770
13
20
28
41
42of
of18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Media
What
and
Group,
and
Gives
Judicial
Judicial
Pro
Them
Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
The
Billing
Right?
File
THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT re Lancaster City Police Continance of September 27, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
August 6, 2016
STATEMENT OF FACT re Lancaster City Police Department

v. CATERBONE FAMILY
1. 1904 According to a LANCASTER NEW ERA (recovered by Microfiche at the Lancaster
County Public Library) published news article:
1. FIRES IN CITY AND COUNTY A HOUSE DAMAGED AND BARN BURNED An

Italian Boarding Establishment Gutted on Monday Night-The Barn on J.M.E.
Rudys Farm Destroyed Monday Night
Quite a stubborn fire occurred on Monday night shortly after 10 o'clock at No. 119
Beaver street, a two-sided & half story frame building occupied by Joseph Catrabone
(CATERBONE-MY GREAT GREAT GRANDFATHER), an Italian who keeps a boarding
house for his fellow countrymen, most of them being street musicians. Most of the
boarders were in bed when the alarm of the fire was raised outside and Catty and a
couple of his compatriots were greatly excited upon learning that the rear end of
their establishment was in flames. Everybody in the place was aroused, but the
excitable Italians were not in condition to do anything but rush about, jabbering and
making confusion worse confounded. Word of the fire was sent to Fire Chief
Vondermuth at No. 5 engine house and he hurried to the scene of the fire, after
sending orders to the other companies. He took with him the new Clapp & Jones
reserve engine, which proved its merit in service, sending a heave stream and with
such force as to require three men to hand the nozzle. The fire at Catrabone's had
worked it's between the partitions and was hard to get at and the Chief kept his
men there until after midnight, before he was satisfied the fire was slumbering
between partitions. The building was badly damaged by the fire and water. The
building is owned by Frances Frailey, and her loss will be about $500. Catrabone lost
considerable furniture and his boarders a great of their effects, one of the being
minus the monkey. The poor fellow, the Italian, not the ******, went about
afterwords-bewildering the loss of de monk, which doubtless perished in
the fire. After the fire fifteen of Catty's boarders were sheltered at the police
station for the night and they had enough ***** with them to fill out an immigrant
train for a trip across the plains. The fire is supposed to have been of I
incendiary origin. While at the fire driver Edward Samoon, of No. 4 house carriage
had his left foot so badly trampled and out by his horse that Dr. Boiendies had to
put four stitches in the wound. He will be laid up for some time.
PUBLIC
Lancaster
Case
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
City Police
&MAL
FEDERAL
Appeal
-v.Clerk
2016
- CATERBONE
Judge
Clerk
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
For
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
Page
PPage
Page
Page
age771
14
21
29
42
143of
of
of82
18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Saturday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October
August16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
6,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Media
What
and
Group,
and
Gives
Judicial
Judicial
Pro
Them
Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
The
Billing
Right?
File
2. My father (Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr.) graduated form Lancaster Catholic High School with
honor society grades, secretary or treasurer of his class, outstanding basketball player, and
he even played a musical instrument. I have original records.
3. In 1943, in Lancaster Newspaper Article, my father graduated from the Naval Air Gunners
School with Honors in Florida. It's training manual, which I have, describes the Air
Gunners as the most psychically and mentally fit servicemen in the U.S. Armed Forces with
double the pay compared to other servicemen.
4. In the 1960's my father went through a rigorous series of involuntary psychiatric
commitments and electro shock therapies initiated by the Lancaster City Police
Department; with stays at Embryville Psychiatric Hospital.
5. During the 1960's my father traveled the world including Hong Kong, Lebanon, Lisbon,
Mexico, Egypt, etc. while still operating Sam Caterbone Cleaners.
6. The Dry Cleaning Association of America awarded my father a Certificate of Recognition for
inventing a filtration system for the Dry Cleaning Industry.
7. In 1972 The Lancaster City Police arrest my father for forging a $200.00 check from
Sam Caterbone Cleaners, Inc. because the only signatory at that time was his wife,
Yolanda RODA Caterbone.
8. In 1972 the Lancaster City Police arrest my father for stealing $2,000.00 from the
basement of his parents home, Book Road in Lampeter, from Joseph Ricupero, his nephew.
9. At trial my father appears Pro Se and is found guilty of the forgery charge and not quilty of
the theft charge. My father spent some 2 months in prison before being released
on bail and is sentenced to 1 year probation. The $200.00 check was made out to
James Coho, the Lancaster Attorney, with Divorce Proceedings written in the
memo.
10.In August of 1973, Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas President Judge Johnstone
ORDERS my father vacate the vicinity of Lancaster County. In essence throwing him out
of Lancaster County. He had no other criminal record.
11.In that same year my fathers properties at 1470 Mahniem Pike are transferred to Jack and
Agnes Silverhorne for $140,000.00 Without any attempts to sell the property; no real
estate for sale sign, Just my mother's cousin Valley Palumbo representing both my mother
and Jack Silverthorne in the transaction. I am alleging that the property was worth at least
$500,000. My father owned the Dry Cleaners, plus 4 store fronts, and two houses which
stretched from the fence line at Alcoa to about 40 feet from the Park City Light. My
mother would ask me to sit in on the meetings and I kept asking her why can't we rent the
property rather than Jack Silverthorne Valley Palumbo had already negotiated the Triple
Net Leases before the settlement ever took place.
12.By the 1960's my father had worked his business and had no debt on 1250 Fremont Street
or his properties on Manhiem Pike.
13.Those incidents left my mother with no income, just the $70,000.00 which made her get a
job at Price Elementary School's cafeteria.
14.My father leaves town and moves to the Bahamas. My mother continues as a low level
Cafeteria Aid, having to start work at 5:30 am while raising me and my 3 younger
brothers.
15.In 1976 I am caring for my mother as she suffers from a clinical depression while attending
to my oldest brother, Sammy, who is trying to cope with his victimization of U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control, specifically the LSD Experiments of MK-ULTRA while in the U.S. Air Force,
as he is in seclusion in the Mt. Vernon Motel on route 72 near Manhiem. Later my mother
and Uncle Ben Roda would demand he leave Lancaster and place him on a bus en route to
California.
16.In 1981 while walking to a church in Miami where my brother Steve lives, he finds my
father taking his daily walk. Before that time my father's father and sister have passed,
with no one being able to find his location or contact him.
17.In 1982 my father returns to Lancaster and lives with his mother on Book Road before
being approved for the Low Income apartment at Apartment 309 in the Church Street
PUBLIC
Lancaster
Case
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
City Police
&MAL
FEDERAL
Appeal
-v.Clerk
2016
- CATERBONE
Judge
Clerk
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
For
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
Page
PPage
Page
Page
age772
15
22
30
43
244of
of
of82
18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Saturday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October
August16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
6,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Media
What
and
Group,
and
Gives
Judicial
Judicial
Pro
Them
Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
The
Billing
Right?
File
Sammy Caterbone, my brother, also is subjected to Psychiatric Commitments by the Lancaster City Police.
Towers in 1983. My mother immediately files for divorce when my father arrives back in
Lancaster in 1982.
18.Christmas Day of 1984 my oldest brother, Sammy, is murdered in Santa Barbara,
California, verified and confirmed by officials of the County of Santa Barbara to me in my
meeting in a Santa Barbara County Office in August of 2005.
19.In 1987 I am arrested by the Manheim Township Police Department for 4 felonies
and 3 Misdemeanors for essentially stealing my own files out of my own property,
which I had a personal guarantee obligation to the owners, Herb Fisher and Marty
Sponougle, and spent 10 days in prison, 10 days in the St. Joseph Psychiatric Ward only to
have ALL CHARGES DISMISSED IN MARCH OF 1988, WELL AFTER THE
ISC/FERRANTI MERGER WAS COMPLETED IN DECMEMBER OF 1987.
20.April 29, 1996 my youngest brother, Thomas P. Caterbone is found dead in a cottage
in Kill Devil Island, North Carolina.
21.In 2006 I am sent to the LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON for 60 days, (October 30 to
December 28) for absolutely nothing; the director of the Bail Supervision Deparmtment
Lied under OATH and Judge Allison MAILCIOIUSLY reinstated my Bail to SECURED rather
than UNSECURED and it took my APPEAL filed while incarcerated to finally free
me. My home at 220 Stone Hill Road was purposefully SOLD AT SHERRIF SALE
ON DECMEMBER 20, 2006 WHILE I COULD NOT FILE APPROPRIATE COURT
DOCUMENTS TO THWART THE ILLEGAL SALE BY FULTON BANK.
22.FAST FORWARD TO 2010 AND THE PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENT BY LANCASTER
CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER....THE JULY 9, 2015 PSYCHIATRIC
COMMITMENT BY LANCASTER CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER...AND
FINALLY THE FEBRUARY 19, 2016 PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENT BY LANCASTER
CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER.
23.THEN WE HAVE THE INCIDENTS OF 2015 TO TODAY, AUGUST 6, 2016.
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400
and 16-1149
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559; 052288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016
Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016;
Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
CI-06-03401
PUBLIC
Lancaster
Case
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
City Police
&MAL
FEDERAL
Appeal
-v.Clerk
2016
- CATERBONE
Judge
Clerk
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
For
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
Page
PPage
Page
Page
age773
16
23
31
44
345of
of
of82
18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Saturday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October
August16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
6,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Media
What
and
Group,
and
Gives
Judicial
Judicial
Pro
Them
Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
The
Billing
Right?
File
PUBLIC
CATERBONE
Lancaster
Case
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Cityv.Police
City
&MAL
FEDERAL
Appeal
of-v.
Lancaster,
Clerk
2016
- CATERBONE
Judge
Clerk
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
PA
Totaro
For
Since
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
1904 Page
PPage
Page
Page
age774
17
24
32
45
446
1 of
of
of
of82
233
18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Saturday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October
August
March16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
8,
6,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Media
What
and
Group,
and
Gives
Judicial
Judicial
Pro
Them
Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
The
Billing
Right?
File
" !
!
!
"
#
$
%& & & " #
#!
#
"
)
"
%
#
$
"
"
"
!'
#
&
"
"
"
1
#
&
'
#
(
*
% ## ! .
"
#
/
%
"
$
)
!(
"#
"
"
,
"#
!
!
"
"
00
#
"
1
"
"
2,
%
"
"
1
* !
333333
#
+,
#
""
)
"#
#
33333
#
'
5 "
7
"
"
##
6
#
"
PUBLIC
CATERBONE
Lancaster
Case
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
No.
No.
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
495/496
Summary
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Cityv.Police
City
&MAL
FEDERAL
Appeal
of-v.
Lancaster,
Clerk
2016
- CATERBONE
Judge
Clerk
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Motion
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
PA
Totaro
For
Since
DOCKETS
&Continuance
Prothonotary
1904 Page
PPage
Page
Page
age775
18
25
33
46
547
2 of
of
of
of82
233
18
811
61
69
82
83
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Saturday
Monday
Friday
September
September
November
October
October
August
March16,
27,
14,
15,
13,
8,
6,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
776
26
34
47
48of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October16,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
777
27
35
48
49of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October16,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
778
28
36
49
50of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October16,
14,
15,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Lancaster
MDJ-02-3-01
May 11, 2016
MJ-02301-TR-0000861-2016
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA
E 0007452-4
MDJ-02-3-01
17603
Fines, Costs, and Restitution
June 10, 2016
75 S 3322 Vehicle Turning Left
3) Discrimination and Retaliation by East Hempfield Twp Police
1) Vindictive and Selective Prosecution 2) Judicial Misconduct
4) Gang Stalking and Assault by Other Vehicle Operator Kurt M. Klausmair, Owner Klausmair Construction
June 10, 2016
Officer Christopher Keen

East Hempfield Township Police
1700 Nissley Road, P.O. Box 128
Landisville, PA
$136.50
$50.00
17538
MDJ Scott E. Albert, MDJ 02-3-01
424 South Angle Street

Mount Joy, PA
17552

717-653-4575
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA
17603
717-669-2163
Summary
Appeal MDJ
Scott
Albert
Page
1 of
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
779
29
37
50
51
of
of6811
61
69
82
83
Tursday
July
7, 2016
2016
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
16,
13,
17,
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Summary
Appeal MDJ
Scott
Albert
Page
2 of
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
780
30
38
51
52
of
of6811
61
69
82
83
Tursday
July
7, 2016
2016
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
16,
13,
17,
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Summary
Appeal MDJ
Scott
Albert
Page
3 of
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
781
31
39
52
53
of
of6811
61
69
82
83
Tursday
July
7, 2016
2016
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
16,
13,
17,
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Summary
Appeal MDJ
Scott
Albert
Page
4 of
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
782
32
40
53
54
of
of6811
61
69
82
83
Tursday
July
7, 2016
2016
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
16,
13,
17,
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Summary
Appeal MDJ
Scott
Albert
Page
5 of
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
783
33
41
54
55
of
of6811
61
69
82
83
Tursday
July
7, 2016
2016
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
16,
13,
17,
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Summary
Appeal MDJ
Scott
Albert
Page
6 of
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
784
34
42
55
56
of
of6811
61
69
82
83
Tursday
July
7, 2016
2016
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October
14,
15,
16,
13,
17,
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
785
35
43
56
57of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October14,
15,
16,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Lancaster
July 7, 2016
PUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
Appeal&MDJ
FEDERAL
- Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Albert
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
786
36
44
57
58
1 of
of811
783
61
69
82
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Thursday
November
October
October
July16,
14,
15,
13,
7,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Lancaster
PUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
Appeal&MDJ
FEDERAL
- Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Albert
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
787
37
45
58
59
2 of
of811
783
61
69
82
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Thursday
November
October
October
July16,
14,
15,
13,
7,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
Appeal&MDJ
FEDERAL
- Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Albert
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
788
38
46
59
60
3 of
of811
783
61
69
82
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Thursday
November
October
October
July16,
14,
15,
13,
7,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
See Attached Docket
PUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
Appeal&MDJ
FEDERAL
- Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Albert
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
789
39
47
60
61
4 of
of811
783
61
69
82
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Thursday
November
October
October
July16,
14,
15,
13,
7,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
Appeal&MDJ
FEDERAL
- Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Albert
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
790
40
48
61
62
5 of
of811
783
61
69
82
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Thursday
November
October
October
July16,
14,
15,
13,
7,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
Appeal&MDJ
FEDERAL
- Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Albert
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
791
41
49
62
63
6 of
of811
783
61
69
82
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Thursday
November
October
October
July16,
14,
15,
13,
7,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Summary
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
Appeal&MDJ
FEDERAL
- Scott
Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
Albert
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
792
42
50
63
64
7 of
of811
783
61
69
82
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Thursday
November
October
October
July16,
14,
15,
13,
7,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
793
43
51
64
65of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October14,
15,
16,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
794
44
52
65
66of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October14,
15,
16,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
795
45
53
66
67of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October14,
15,
16,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
796
46
54
67
68of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October14,
15,
16,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
797
47
55
68
69of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October14,
15,
16,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
798
48
56
69
70of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October14,
15,
16,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
799
49
57
70
71of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October14,
15,
16,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
800
50
58
71
72of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October14,
15,
16,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
PUBLICCORRUPTION
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
STATE,
& FEDERAL
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
801
51
59
72
73of
of811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
November
October
October14,
15,
16,
13,
17,2016
2015
2016
Gmail - Your GEICO claim: here's what to expect
1 of 2
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=acf0584318&view=pt&sear...
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
Stan Caterbone <stancaterbone@gmail.com>
Your GEICO claim: here's what to expect

1 message
GEICO Claims <GEICO_CLAIMS@geico.com>
Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:15 PM
Reply-To: GEICO Claims <reply-fecb15747360067e-26_HTML-375255353-1058498-51915@email1.geico.com>
To: stancaterbone@gmail.com
Details about your new claim
View this email in your browser
Stanley Caterbone
Your Claim Number: 0557461720101014
You successfully set up your claim

Thank you for reporting your claim. We hope to make this process
as simple as possible for you.
You also reserved a rental vehicle through Enterprise Rent-A-Car.
Your reservation number is 717543.
Rental Location:
2010 Columbia Ave
Lancaster, PA 17603-4331 US
If you have any questions or concerns about your rental vehicle,
please contact Enterprise Rent-A-Car at 717-290-1111.
VIEW RENTAL INFO
Use claims.geico.com to check your claim status,

schedule/reschedule your vehicle appointment, review your estimate
and payments, fill out any forms, upload documents, contact us, and
much more.
PUBLIC
Accident
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
File at Med
& FEDERAL
Express
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
802
52
60
73
174of
of
of10
811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday,
November
October
October
May16,
14,
15,
13,
9,
17,2016
2015
2016
5/9/2016 9:30 PM
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Accident
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
File at Med
& FEDERAL
Express
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
803
53
61
74
275of
of
of10
61
69
82
811
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday,
November
October
October
May14,
15,
16,
13,
9,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Accident
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
File at Med
& FEDERAL
Express
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
804
54
62
75
376of
of
of10
61
69
82
811
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday,
November
October
October
May14,
15,
16,
13,
9,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Accident
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
File at Med
& FEDERAL
Express
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
805
55
63
76
477of
of
of10
811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday,
November
October
October
May13,
15,
16,
14,
9,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Accident
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
File at Med
& FEDERAL
Express
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
806
56
64
77
578of
of
of10
811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday,
November
October
October
May13,
15,
16,
14,
9,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Accident
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
File at Med
& FEDERAL
Express
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
807
57
65
78
679of
of
of10
811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday,
November
October
October
May13,
15,
16,
14,
9,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Accident
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
File at Med
& FEDERAL
Express
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
808
58
66
79
780of
of
of10
811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday,
November
October
October
May13,
15,
16,
14,
9,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Accident
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
File at Med
& FEDERAL
Express
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
809
59
67
80
881of
of
of10
811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday,
November
October
October
May13,
15,
16,
14,
9,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Accident
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
File at Med
& FEDERAL
Express
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
Page
810
60
68
81
982of
of
of10
811
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday,
November
October
October
May13,
15,
16,
14,
9,
17,2016
2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Civiland
Civil
Civil
Rights
Advanced
Rights
Rights
Violation
Violation
Mediaand
Group,
and
Judicial
Judicial
Pro Se
Misconduct
Misconduct
Billing File
PUBLIC
Accident
PUBLIC
LOCAL,
CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
STATE,
File at Med
& FEDERAL
Express
- Clerk
- Clerk
Judge
of
COURT
ofD.
Courts
Courts
Totaro
DOCKETS
& Prothonotary
Page
Page
Page
811
10
61
69
82
83of
of811
10
61
69
82
83
Sunday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Friday
Monday,
November
October
October
May13,
15,
16,
14,
9,
17,2016
2015
2016

Stan J. Caterbone Local, State, and Federal Court (811 Pages/Bookmarks) Docket Sheets As of November 12, 2016

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Stan J. Caterbone Local, State, and Federal Court (811 Pages/Bookmarks) Docket Sheets As of November 12, 2016

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Stan J.

Caterbone and Advanced

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,

1250 Fremont Street

U.S. DISTRICT COURT DOCKET SHEETS

WILL RETURN TO LITIGATION

Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced

Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced

Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced

Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced

Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced

Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced

Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced

Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced

July 19, 2016 Hearing,

120 J.C. No. 03-16-90005

Office of the Circuit Executive,

121 J.C. No. 03-16-900042

Judge Smith, et.al.,

Chapter 11 To Appeal 16-cv-49

NEXT EVENT DUE

Docketed July 29, 2016

FINAL ORDER on June

U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals

14-02559 LAMBERT HABEUS

14-02559 LAMBERT HABEUS

15-03984 CATERBONE HABEUS

06-4650 REVERSE DISMISSAL

LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF

July 28, 2016 Citations

CATERBONE v. Lancaster General

Preliminary Emergency Injunction IFP Denied July 8, 2016

146 2016-462 (Brown)

DAUPHIN COUNTY COURT OF

Leonard Brown III

Docketed August 4, 2016

LANCASTER COUNTY MDJ

MJ-02204-TR-0001981148 2016 No Parking Permitted

MJ02301-TR-00000281149 2016 Left Turn, Accident

Summary Appeal CP-36-SA0000219-2016

MJ-02101-TR-0002242150 2016 Following Too Close

July 27, 2016 2:30pm

U.S. District Court for the Eastern

Fulton Bank Auto Stay

U.S. Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Petition

They want to discharge or

Sealed Federal Case 1987 to Present

Need to Amend and talk to

Federal False Caims Act - ISC

Habeas Corpus Lanc County Prison

Judge Anita Brody

Judge Anita Brody

Judge Anita Brody

Judge Mary McLaughlin

U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Appeal Brody PP&L

PA Court of Common Pleas

S Caterbone v. Thomas Grasell

S Caterbone v. Conestoga Police

S Caterbone v. Lancaster General

Defualted, May move to

S Caterbone AMG v. Harleysville