Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 Nov. 2016
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s11/1105
Page 88
P (%) Kd
w
IJER@2016
1.03
0 .8
10
0.00076 h
(4)
10
mrad
he h p
d
is
Pw
6.0107 Cfd 3 10 10
(5)
100
Where:
Pw = probability of a fade as a fraction of time, d = Path length in
kilometers, f= Frequency in gigahertz, C = propagation conditions
factor, A = fade depth in decibel. This equation is only valid for
fade depths of 15 dB or more.
100
98
96
94
92
90
88
15
20
25
30
35
fade depth in decibel (dB)
40
45
50
Number_of_errorneous_Bits
(3)
Number_of_Transmitted_Bits
The standard end-to-end error performance
parameters and objectives are defined by ITU-R in [6] for a 27
500 km HRP (Hypothetical Reference Path). The target BER
in our work is lower than 10-6.
4) Availability calculations
Three models are commonly used to predict the worst
month link unavailability in the terrestrial microwave link:
The ITU model, Barnett-Vigants model and Morita Model
used respectively in worldwide Rec. ITU, North America, and
in the Japan. We present the ITU model and the BarnettVigants model in this paper.
The percentage of time Pw that fade depth A (dB)
is exceeded in the average worst month from (Rec. ITU-R
P.530-16):
BER
3 .4
Where:
f : Frequency (GHz), d (km) is the path length , A(dB) is the
effective fade-out margin (or flat margin if signatures are used), K
1)
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 Nov. 2016
100.01
100
99.99
99.98
99.97
99.96
99.95
99.94
15
20
25
30
35
fade depth in decibel (dB)
40
45
50
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s11/1105
Page 89
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 Nov. 2016
B.
Throughput, Modulation, and frequency spectrum
optimization
Mbps
max
2 W log
M
2
(6)
M 1
M
E
3
b
M 1 N 0
-2
10
-4
10
-6
10
x
1
e 2
2 x
Eb/No (dB)
15
20
25
The main parameters affecting the choice of radiofrequency channel arrangements are XS, YS, ZS and DS
developed and defined in [12]. Also, the choice of radio-frequency
channel arrangement depends on the values of cross-polar
discrimination (XPD) and on the net filter discrimination (NFD)
where these parameters are defined in [12]. With the development
of wireless technologies which can go up to 2048-QAM
modulation or with the OFDM modulation, we can optimize the
use of ITU-RF channels:
1. by reducing of the channel width and increasing the
modulation level
2. by the aggregation of the adjacent channels to obtain a
wide canal and the reduction of modultion level to
increase the performance of the link.
The methodology of the frequencies optimization is described
below:
Let
F1 , F2 ,..., Fn
'
'
'
channels, F1 , F2 ,..., Fn the ITU-RF high frequency,
(8)
L
(9)
The figure 3 below illustrates the BER for AGWN for 4QAM, 16-QAM, 64-QAM and 256-QAM.
10
M=4
M=16
M=64
M=256
BER
10
XS
is the each channel width, DS the Tx/Rx duplex
2
spacing
Let
T1 , T2 ,..., Tm
'
'
with L'
XS '
XS
'
'
, DS ' DS the Tx / R x
L
2
2
duplex spacing
IJER@2016
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s11/1105
Page 90
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 Nov. 2016
T1 F1
L L'
2 2
(10)
Tm Tm 1 L' T1 m 1 L'
for m 2 ,
(11)
For k=1 m:
T Tk DS
'
k
If L 0 ,
(12)
one supplementary usable channel Tm 1
with
Tm 1 Tm
L' L
2
2
(13)
Tm' 1 Tm 1 DS
(14)
III.
A.
Theoretical results
Experimental method
IJER@2016
UIT-R F.384-11
30
25
D.
20
15
10
7442
7470
7498
7526
7554
7582
Initial frequency channels Fn (MHz)
7610
7638
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s11/1105
Page 91
CONCLUSION
35
Channel width 40 MHz and 24 MHz
IV.
40
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
7448
7488
7528
7568
7608 7640
Target frequency channels Tn (MHz)
ISSN:2319-6890)(online),2347-5013(print)
1 Nov. 2016
Experimental results
Bandwidth
Modulation
7 GHz
7 GHz
7 GHz
7 GHz
14 MHz
28 MHz
28 MHz
56 MHz
256 QAM
16 QAM
256 QAM
16 QAM
Fade
margin
27,7 dB
35,02 dB
25,52 dB
32,5 dB
Bandwidth
14 MHz
28 MHz
28 MHz
56 MHz
Modulation
256 QAM
16 QAM
256 QAM
16 QAM
Fade margin
28,8 dB
36,3 dB
25,20 dB
34,00 dB
IJER@2016
V.
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
xi
xii
xiii
BIBLIOGRAPHIE
doi : 10.17950/ijer/v5s11/1105
Page 92