Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Esthetic Dentistry
Mock-ups help with demanding patients
Background.Elective restorative procedures should
not be undertaken until the dentist clearly understands
the patients expectations and the patient understands
the limitations of treatment. Before undertaking an irreversible procedure, the final result should be presented visually and as realistically as possible. Mock-ups prepared
when porcelain laminate veneers are chosen to obtain esthetics and function are objective and effective tools enabling the dentist, patient, and laboratory technician to
communicate clearly. With mock-ups everyone can see
a 3-dimensional representation of the result intraorally
over an extended time. This is better than the 2-dimensional images on a chairside screen. A series of diagnostic
mock-ups served as a means to evaluate esthetic demands
and provide restorations acceptable to a patient whose
esthetic sense was demanding.
Case Report.Woman, 21, was unhappy with her existing acrylic resin veneer provisional restorations (Fig 1) and
Volume 54
Issue 1
2009
13
Fig 4.A, Silicone index adapted to preparations. B, Excess polymerized acrylic resin. C, Intraoral anterior view of mock-up. D, Removal of
excess polymerized resin with blade. (Courtesy of Reshad M, Cascione D, Magne P: Diagnostic mock-ups as an objective tool for predictable
outcomes with porcelain laminate veneers in esthetically demanding patients: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 99:333-339, 2008.)
14
Dental Abstracts
Fig 9.A, Intraoral anterior view of definitive restorations. B, Intraoral lateral view of definitive restorations. C, Patient smiling with definitive
restorations. D, Patient is satisfied with definitive restorations. (Courtesy of Reshad M, Cascione D, Magne P: Diagnostic mock-ups as an objective tool for predictable outcomes with porcelain laminate veneers in esthetically demanding patients: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent
99:333-339, 2008.)
wanted the definitive restorations to be better. Her maxillary anterior teeth had been prepared for porcelain laminate veneers, but she was dissatisfied with the provisional
result and referred for final restoration procedures. She
had undergone extensive orthodontic treatment that was
unsuccessful (Fig 2), with large open contacts in the maxillary anterior dentition remaining after the procedure.
Her complaint focused on the shape of the overcontoured provisional restorations and the asymmetry and
lack of harmony between her maxillary central incisors.
Most people can perceive an angulation of the maxillary
central incisor crown (cant) of 2 mm or more; this patient
recognized a cant of 1 mm, so was classified as exacting.
She had no desire to undergo further orthodontic treatment. Assessment of her physiological and psychological
needs yielded a categorization of the problem as Class III,
meaning that although she was exacting, her dental needs
could be met using a mock-up and provisional restorations
for an objective communication tool. Porcelain laminate veneers were determined to be the best approach for restoring her maxillary anterior teeth after other options were
presented, discussed, and rejected by the patient.
Volume 54
Issue 1
2009
15
was quite accepting of the outcome with the direct mockup, but was encouraged to wear the mock-up for a week
so that her friends and family could give her feedback.
She remained satisfied overall, but had several modifications to make to the mock-up. The modified mock-up
was then translated into stone and the patients approval
was again sought. At this point, tooth preparation was resumed. The clinician was able to produce just what the patient wanted esthetically in the final restoration (Fig 9).
Discussion.Use of the mock-ups and allowing the patient to be fully informed and directly participating in the
process removed several barriers to providing a restoration
with appropriate esthetics. The patients attitude and psychological status were considered at each step. The clinical
procedure was achieved through direct communication between patient, dentist, and laboratory technician.
Reshad M, Cascione D, Magne P: Diagnostic mock-ups as an objective tool for predictable outcomes with porcelain laminate veneers
in esthetically demanding patients: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent
99:333-339, 2008
Reprints available from M Reshad, Dept of Advanced Graduate Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Univ of Southern California, 925 W
34th St, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0641; fax: 213-740-1209; e-mail:
reshad@usc.edu
Implants
Endoscopic transnasal removal of implant
Background.Dental implants and other foreign bodies may migrate and require removal. An endoscopic transnasal approach was used for a woman whose implant
became displaced.
Case Report.Woman, 46, complained of an unattractive smile because of a missing upper premolar tooth and an
edentulous space left when an upper molar was extracted.
Examination revealed several teeth had been extracted, creating an unesthetic gap between the upper left first premolar and the upper left first molar. The approach chosen to
resolve the problem included an implant-supported fixed
restoration in the area of the second left upper premolar
and the right upper second molar. Surface-roughened, titanium dental implants were placed. The patient desired an
esthetic result as quickly as possible, so the premolar-site
implant, which had good initial stability, had a temporary
restoration placed immediately. Routine follow-up after
7 days showed no problems.
Three weeks later the patient complained that the tooth
had fallen out and she now had mild pain on the left side
of her face. The premolar-site implant could not be found
on clinical examination, so an orthopantomogram was obtained (Fig 1). The implant had become dislodged into
the posterior area of the left maxillary sinus. The patient
eventually admitted that she had lost the temporary crown
2 weeks previously and had been chewing on the exposed
area of the implant. A maxillofacial surgeon was consulted
to perform surgical removal of the implant. An endoscopic
transnasal approach was chosen. The endoscopic
16
Dental Abstracts
Fig 1.Orthopantomogram showing dental implant in left maxillary sinus. (Courtesy of Lubbe DE, Aniruth S, Peck T, et al: Endoscopic transnasal removal of migrated dental implants. Br Dent
J 204:435-436, 2008.)
uncinectomy and middle meatal antrostomy located the implant in the posteromedial aspect of the maxillary sinus.
The implant was removed atraumatically using a curved forceps under 30-degree endoscopic guidance.
Discussion.The classic Caldwell-Luc procedure
would have been much more invasive than the endoscopic
transnasal approach for this patient. An otolaryngologist
should be consulted when there is a maxillary antrum lesion
to determine if endoscopic transnasal removal is feasible.