Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
DOI 10.1007/s11009-009-9145-3
Received: 10 June 2009 / Accepted: 16 June 2009 / Published online: 30 June 2009
Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009
Abstract Exact analytic solutions of some stochastic differential equations are given
along with characteristic futures of these models as the Mean and Variance. The
procedure is based on the Ito calculus and a brief description is given. Classical
stochastic models and also new models are provided along with a related bibliography. Stochastic models included are the Gompertz, Linear models with multiplicative
noise term, the Revised Exponential and the Generalized Logistic. Emphasis is given
in the presentation of stochastic models with a sigmoid form for the mean value.
These models are of particular interest when dealing with the innovation diffusion
into a specific population, including the spread of epidemics, diffusion of information
and new product adoption.
Keywords Stochastic simulation Analytic solutions Stochastic modeling
Stochastic Gompertz model Stochastic generalized Logistic model
Revised exponential Stochastic simulation
AMS 2000 Subject Classification 37H10 37L55 60H05 60H07 60H10 60H35
65C30 91B70
1 Introduction
The Stochastic Differential Equations (SDE) play an important role in numerous
physical phenomena. The numerical methods for solving these equations show low
accuracy especially for the cases with high non-linear drift terms. It is therefore very
important to search and present exact solutions for SDE. The resulting solutions are
also important to check for the accuracy of existing numerical methods.
C. H. Skiadas (B)
Technical University of Crete, Chania, Crete, Greece
e-mail: skiadas@asmda.net
262
The first attempts for solving SDEs where based on proposing an integrating
factor that could transform a SDE to a linear form that could be solved explicitly.
A systematic method for reducing a non-linear SDE to a linear one was due to
Kloeden and Platen (1999) and Kloeden et al. (1992, 2003). They proposed a suitable
transformation function for the reduction of a particular SDE. This method is
suitable for the cases presented here. The main theoretical issues are given in the
following.
1.1 Ito Stochastic Differential Equations
A stochastic process x(t) confirms an Ito stochastic differential equation of the
form if:
dx(t) = a(x, t) dt + b (x, t) dw(t)
if for all t and t0 the following stands (Gardiner 1990),
t
t
a(x, s) ds +
b (x, s) dw(s)
x(t) = x(t0 ) +
t0
(1)
(2)
t0
(3)
(4)
where
1
t = exp a1 t b 21 t + b 1 wt
2
The mean and the variance are computed by the following forms
dmt
= a1 mt + a2
dt
for the Mean and
dVt
= (2a1 + b 21 )Vt + 2mt (a2 + b 1 b 2 ) + b 22
dt
for the Variance.
By the use of a suitable transformation function x(t) = U(y(t)) the reduction
method was initially presented by Gihman and Skorokhod (1972) both for autonomous and for non-autonomous stochastic differential equations. In this case,
263
only the reduction method for autonomous stochastic differential equations will be
presented.
In applying this formula to Ito in the transformation function U(y) the following
results:
dU(y) =
U(y)
1 2 U(y)
(dy)2
dy +
y
2
y2
The above method will be used for the solution of some nonlinear stochastic
diffusion equations which are presented in the following providing closed form
solutions.
1
dyt = d ln xt = (b yt c2 )dt + cdwt
2
The last equation is a stochastic linear differential equation and it is solved using
the previous formulas to give
t
c2
exp(b s)dws
(1 exp(b t)) + c exp(b t)
yt = ln xt = ln x0 exp(b t)
2b
0
264
1
1
1
dxt exp(bt) 2 (dxt )2
xt
2
xt
265
bs ds
t0
b
xt dt + cxt dwt
t
1
xt = x0 exp b ln (t/t0 ) c2 (t t0 ) + c(wt wt0 )
2
b
xt dt + cxt dwt
t2
1
xt = x0 exp b (1/t 1/t0 ) c2 (t t0 ) + c(wt wt0 )
2
This is stochastic process providing paths with a sigmoid form mean value (see
Skiadas et al. 1993).
The mean value of xt is expressed by
E{xt } = xt0 exp{b (1/t 1/t0 )}
The Variance is expressed by
Var{xt } = x2t0 exp{2b (1/t 1/t0 )} exp (c2 (t t0 )) 1
266
t
dxt = b xt 1
dt
F
where b , m and F are parameters.
By dividing both sides of the last equation by F and placing yt = xt /F results
dyt = b yt 1 (yt )m dt
To solve this differential equation the method of change of variables is needed by
using zt = ym
t .
Then the last differential equation reduces to the linear differential equation
dzt = bm(zt 1)dt
(5)
(6)
(7)
1/m
xt = F 1 + ((x0 /F)m 1) exp(bmt)
(8)
This is a sigmoid form model with saturation level achieved at the upper limit F.
The parameter b accounts for the speed of the product adoption process.
The inflection point is achieved at xin f = (1/(m + 1))1/m .
4.2 The Stochastic Model
The stochastic Generalized Logistic model with a multiplicative noise term is given
by the stochastic differential equation
x
m
t
dt + cxt dwt
dxt = b xt 1
F
As for the deterministic model above by dividing both sides of the last equation
by F and placing yt = xt /F results
dyt = b yt 1 (yt )m dt + cyt dwt
For the solution of the last stochastic differential equation the reduction method
will be used. The change of variables is achieved by using the same integration factor
as for the deterministic case zt = ym
t .
Then the following Ito formula is applied to the transformation function zt :
dzt =
yt
1 2 yt
(dyt )2
dyt +
y
2 y2
267
By introducing in the last form the values for yt and dyt from the previous
forms and rearranging the following form of the transformed stochastic differential
equation results:
2
c
dzt =
m(m + 1) b m zt + b m dt cmzt dwt
2
This is a linear autonomous stochastic differential equation. The solution arises after using the following general form for the solution of a linear stochastic differential
equation of the type:
drt = (a1 rt + a2 )dt + (b 1 rt )dwt
where a1 , a2 and b1 are parameters. The solution is given by:
t
t1 ds
rt = t r0 + a2
0
where
t = exp (a1 b 21 /2)t + b 1 wt
Considering that in our case a1 = c2 m(m + 1)/2 b m, a2 = b m and b 1 = cm;
t is given by:
t = exp{(b m + c2 m/2)t cmwt )}
Then the resulting solution for zt is
t
s1 ds
zt = t z0 + b m
0
2
t
c
zt = exp m
z0 + b m (exp((c2 m/2 + b m)s + cmws ))ds
b t cwt
2
0
Finally, the solution of the Generalized Logistic stochastic differential equation
1/m
and xt = Fyt
arises after the application of the reversal transformations yt = zt
and is in the form of:
1/m
t
1/m
1
ym
+
b
m
ds
yt = t
s
0
0
1/m
xt = Ft
(x0 /F)m + b m
0
s1 ds
1/m
(9)
268
t
dxt = b xt 1
dt
F
(See analytic solution and related applications in Giovanis and Skiadas (1995) and
for a more general model in Skiadas and Giovanis (1997) Then from the solution for
the Generalized Logistic model the formula the the solution of the Logistic model
results immediately by introducing m = 1.
1
t
1
1
1
xt = Ft
s ds
(x0 /F) + b
0
where
t = exp (b + c2 /2)t cwt
(x0 /F)
+b
exp (b c2 /2)s + cws ds
1
1
xt = F 1 + ((x0 /F)1 1) exp(b t)
(10)
E(g(w))2
2
t
t
t
E (cws )2 /2 ds = exp (c2 s/2)ds
E exp (cws )ds = exp
0
We thus obtain
E{t } = exp(b t)
269
and
t
t
1
2
t ds
= E exp b
((b c /2)s + cws )ds
E exp b
0
t
(b s)ds = exp(b t) 1
= exp b
0
E{xt } =
F
1 + (x0 /F)1 1 exp(b t)
5 Conclusion
Exact solutions of several stochastic models are given along with the related analysis.
The solution methods are based on the Ito theory for the solution of stochastic
270
differential equations. Some sigmoid form models are given in the deterministic and
the stochastic form and an illustrative example of the stochastic Logistic model is
presented. The provided exact analytic forms could be very useful for testing the
existing and new approximate methods for the solution of stochastic differential
equations.
References
Gardiner CW (1990) Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and natural science,
2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Gompertz B (1825) On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on
the mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philos Trans R Soc 115:513585
Gihman II, Skorokhod AV (1972) Stochastic differential equations. Springer, Berlin
Giovanis AN, Skiadas CH (1995) Forecasting the electricity consumption by applying stochastic
modeling techniques: the case of Greece. In: Janssen J, Skiadas CH, Zopounidis C (eds) Advances in applying stochastic modeling and data analysis. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Ito K (1944) Stochastic integral. Proc Imp Acad Tokyo 20:519524
Ito K (1951) On stochastic differential equations. Mem Am Math Soc 4:151
Kloeden PE, Platen E (1999) Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations. Springer, Berlin
Kloeden PE, Platen E, Schurz H (2003) Numerical solution of SDE through computer experiments.
Springer, Berlin
Kloeden PE, Schurz H, Platten E, Sorensen M (1992) On effects of discretization on estimators of
drift parameters for diffusion processes. Research Report no. 249, department of theoretical
statistics. Institute of Mathematics, University of Aarhus
Richards FJ (1959) A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot 10:290300
Skiadas CH (1985) Two generalized rational models for forecasting innovation diffusion. Technol
Forecast Soc Change 27:3961
Skiadas CH (1986) Innovation diffusion models expressing asymmetry and/or positively or negatively
influencing forces. Technol Forecast Soc Change 30:313330
Skiadas CH (1987) Two simple models for the early and middle stage prediction of innovation
diffusion. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 34:7984
Skiadas CH, Giovanis AN (1997) A stochastic bass innovation diffusion model studying the growth
of electricity consumption in Greece. Appl Stoch Models Data Anal 13:85101
Skiadas CH, Giovanis AN, Dimoticalis J (1993) A sigmoid stochastic growth model derived from the
revised exponential. In: Janssen J, Skiadas CH (eds) Applied stochastic models and data analysis.
World Scientific, Singapore, pp 864870
Skiadas CH, Giovanis AN, Dimoticalis J (1994) Investigation of stochastic differential models: the
gompertzian case. In: Gutierez R, Valderama Bonnet MJ (eds) Selected topics on stochastic
modeling. World Scientific, Singapore