Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CLT
EFL
ELT
FLA
L1
mother tongue
L2
target language
LA
language acquisition
LT
language teaching
SLA
153
154
155
156
Discourse: One of the four systems of language, the others being vocabulary,
grammar and phonology. Discourse has various definitions but one way of
thinking about it is as any piece of extended language, written or spoken, that
has unity and meaning and purpose. One possible way of understanding
'extended' is as language that is more than one sentence.
Discourse markers: Words and phrases used in speaking and writing to
'signpost' discourse. Discourse markers do this by showing turns, joining ideas
together, showing attitude, and generally controlling communication. Some
people regard discourse markers as a feature of spoken language only.
Drill: A common controlled activity, involving students in repetition or very
controlled oral practice.
Ellipsis: The omission of one or more words from a sentence, where they are
unnecessary because they have already been mentioned. Meaning can be
understood without these words. Ellipsis is one of the aspects of language that
gives text cohesion.
English as a Foreign Language (EFL): Learning and using English as an
additional language in a non-English speaking country. It can be compared with
ESL and ESOL, which refer mainly to learning English as a new resident in an
English-speaking country.
English Language Teaching (ELT): The activity and industry of teaching
English to non-native speakers.
Exposure: The contact that the learner has with the language that they are
trying to learn, either generally or with specific language points. Referring to
157
158
159
Input: The language that the learner is exposed to (either written or spoken)
in the environment. See also exposure.
Interactional language: The language we use to build and maintain
relationships. It can be compared to transactional language, which normally
carries a message and is the language used to get things done. To maintain
interaction, speakers use interactional strategies.
Interactional hypothesis: According to this hypothesis, language is acquired
as learners actively engage in attempting to communicate in the target
language. The hypothesis is consistent with the experiential philosophy of
learning by doing. Acquisition will be maximized when learners engage in
tasks that push them to the limits of their current competence.
Interlocutor: A participant in a conversation.
Jigsaw: An information gap exercise. Learners hear or read different parts of a
text, then exchange information with others in order to complete a task.
Language acquisition: This term is most often used interchangeably with
language learning. However, for some researchers, most notably Stephen
Krashen, acquisition is contrasted with learning. According to Krashen,
acquisition represents unconscious learning, which takes place when attention
is focused on meaning rather than language form.
Language skills (the four skills): In language teaching, this refers to the
mode or manner in which language is used. Listening, speaking, reading and
writing are generally called the four language skills.
Lexis: The vocabulary of a language.
160
161
162
163
164
Resources:
Lightbown and Spada 2006
Nunan 2010
Scrivener 1994
British Council. BBC Teaching English. Teaching knowledge database.1
ELT World Wiki. Glossary of Terms.2
My English Pages. Reflections On New Teaching Horizons. Glossary for
ESL/EFL teaching.3
My English Pages. Reflections On New Teaching Horizons. Glossary for ESL/EFL teaching.
165
Appendix C Activities
Activity 1 Transactional task
(Cunningham and Moor 2007: 57)
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
A crossword created with the Crossword Maker from Oxford Teachers Club
173
The complete map downloaded from the Internet as a free colouring picture
(www.google.com). The blank map self-made by deleting the drawings in the original version.
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
Activity 20 Storytelling: using visual input (Haines and Stewart 2000: 155)
181
182
183
10
11
184
185
12
http://www.breakingnewsenglish.com/0511/051119-climate_change-e.html
13
186
14
187
188
Activity 31 Discussions and debates: the same task and different roles
(Redston et al. 2007: 147-148)
189
15
190
191
192
16
http://www.eslpartyland.com/teachers/music/musicimpressions.htm
193
194
17
A self-made board game designed to accompany the subject matter covered by the
coursebook.
195
196
Appendix D Questionnaire
Teaching English survey
This survey explores teaching habits of Czech and Austrian teachers of English.
It takes cca 15 minutes to complete this survey.
197
translation
information gap activities
role plays
discussions and debates
brainstorming
dictation
interviews
storytelling
picture describing (orally)
picture narrating by several
sequential pictures
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
198
in pairs
in small groups
()
(36 students)
in an open-class
()
discussion
as individuals
after being
()
asked
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
I speak English in my
classes at all times.
I often adapt the tasks
or instructions in the
book so that they
better suit my students'
needs.
I design my own
activities and/or
teaching materials.
I include authentic
materials in my
lessons.
strongly
agree
rather
agree
neither
agree nor
disagree
rather
disagree
strongly
disagree
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
Completely
likely. +++
Very
likely.
++
Slightly
likely. +
Not at
all
likely. -
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
199
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
things
)
)
)
)
Before an activity.
During an activity.
After an activity.
Never.
200
strongly
agree
rather
agree
neither
agree
nor
disagree
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
201
rather
disagree
strongly
disagree
2
()
()
()
()
3
()
()
()
()
4
()
()
()
()
5
()
()
()
()
10) What does your decision for or against immediate error correction
depend on? You can choose more options if they apply.
[
[
[
[
]
]
]
]
11) Look at the following speakers. Would you like your students to
speak like Speaker 1 or Speaker 2?
( ) Speaker 1: Well, I kind of get on with all my neighbours er... except one.
They've er.. got a teenage son, you see, and he's... he's, like, learning to play
the drums. They're really loud and er .... it drives us crazy!
( ) Speaker 2: I get on with all my neighbours except one. They've got a
teenage son and he's learning to play the drums. They're really loud and it
drives us crazy!
202
rather
agree
neither
agree nor
disagree
rather
disagree
strongly
disagree
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
203
13a) How much time (in minutes) would you allow for this or a similar
speaking task in your lesson?
Put in numbers only.
...................
13b) How much time (in minutes) would you spend on pre-teaching
useful language? (e.g. grammar, vocabulary, phrases, etc.)
Put in numbers only. (Write 0 if you wouldn't do this at all.)
...................
13c) How much time (in minutes) would you allow your students for
discussing their ideas?
Put in numbers only.
...................
13d) How much time (in minutes) would you allow your students for
presenting their end product to the others?
Put in numbers only. (Write 0 if you wouldn't do this at all.)
...................
13e) Would you pre-teach any language?
If you put in "Yes" or "Maybe", give an example of what you would preteach.
( ) Yes.
( ) Maybe.
( ) No.
13f) At what stage should your students draw their ideas on paper?
( ) During the activity while discussing their ideas.
( ) After the activity when finished with discussing their ideas.
( ) Never. I wouldn't ask them to do this.
( ) At home - as homework.
13g) Have you ever done anything similar like this in your class?
( ) Yes, many times.
( ) Yes, a few times.
( ) No, never.
204
14) What are your most favourite activities for teaching speaking
skills?
You can name several types of activities or describe your favourite activities in
your own words.
.....................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................
This is the end of the survey. Click on the submit button to complete
it.
If you would like to see the results, type your email address below and they will
be sent to you in January.
............................................
Thank you. That completes the survey.
Your participation is greatly appreciated!
205
Q 1: How often do your students practise English through the following activities?
206
Q 1: How often do your students practise English through the following activities?
207
Chart 10 - brainstorming:
208
Q 1: How often do your students practise English through the following activities?
Chart 13 - storytelling:
209
Chart 14 - dictation:
210
211
212
Chart 20 Vocabulary
animals, school subjects, body, clothes
213
Chart 21 Grammar
past continuous, going to x will, passive voice, should / shouldn't
214
215
216
Q 2: How often do your students express themselves in English in the following ways
in your classes?
Chart 27 Czech
Chart 28 Austrian
217
Self-evaluation - differences
Pie charts 29 and 30 My lessons are effective in helping students to learn
how to communicate in English.
Q 12: Do you agree with the statement?
Czech
Austrian
Czech
Austrian
218
Czech
Austrian
Czech
Austrian
219
external factors
Table 6
large groups
unauthentic situations,
inappropriate material or topics
fixed syllabus or too many other
priorities
lack of time
Austrian
14
5
school atmosphere
Czech
Austrian
10
lack of discipline
11
lack of vocabulary
students turning to L1
Table 7
Czech
personal factors:
cooperativeness,
motivation and
discipline
fear
knowledge
5
L1
interference with L1
other
18
other
This was a contingency question. Only the respondents who reported to find teaching
speaking rather or completely difficult answered it.
220
Czech
Austrian
Czech
Austrian
221
222
Czech
Austrian
223
Q 6b: How often do you use transcripts of recordings to teach the following?
19
224
Austrian
Czech
Austrian
225
Chart 52 - Austrian
Czech
Austrian
226
Austrian
Pie charts 56 and 57 When student interact freely they copy each others
mistakes.
Q 7: Do you agree with the statement?
Czech
Austrian
227
Czech
Austrian
Czech
Austrian
228
Czech
Austrian
Czech
Austrian
229
230
% of
Czech
6%
14%
16%
18%
16%
14%
2%
10%
4%
% of
Austrian
22'
33'
2%
10%
18%
8%
20%
4%
14%
8%
14%
2%
% of
Czech
10%
14%
4%
36%
30%
4%
2%
10'30''
5'30''
10'00''
% of
Austrian
2%
8%
2%
24%
24%
32%
2%
4%
2%
Number of
minutes
0
2-3
5
6-8
10
15
20
25
30
15'30''
Average number
of minutes
231
% of
Czech
6%
6%
40%
8%
20%
16%
4%
% of
Austrian
8'00''
13'30''
2%
20%
6%
20%
24%
18%
2%
8%
Austrian
Language pre-taught:
Czech
Austrian
vocabulary
22
17
12
functions
linking words
it depends on students
other
comment on instructions
20 20
Austrian: 37
This was a contingency question. Only the respondents who reported to find teaching
speaking rather or completely difficult answered it. Some of the learners referred to teaching
more items on the list. The question was not compulsory, however, and some respondents
chose not to answer it therefore the numbers do not correspond with the number of
respondents.
232
Czech
Austrian
Czech
Austrian
233
Czech resume
Tato prce zkoum vuku komunikativnch jazykovch dovednost ze irho
hlediska s ohledem na komunikativn kompetenci. Prce je rozdlena do ty
st. V prvn sti autorka pedstavuje svj zmr, v druh sti nsledn
nastiuje teoretick hlediska a jejich vazby na praktickou vuku, dle pak nabz
irok spektrum praktickch ukzek aktivit pro vuku mluven a prci uzavr
empirickm vzkumem, kter srovnv vuku komunikativnch dovednost tak,
jak jsou vyuovny v esk republice a v Rakousku.
Na zatku prce pojednv o jednotlivch aspektech, kter odliuj
mluvenou e od psan, a podtrhuje jejich odlin d. Dle pak zdrazuje
dleitost kontextu a rozliuje mezi dvma typy komunikace. Prce klade draz
na skutenost, e vuku komunikativnch dovednost je teba nahlet ze ir
perspektivy, kter zohleduje vechny rozmry komunikativn kompetence:
lingvistickou, sociolingvistickou, diskurzn a strategickou. Vznam prce spov
tak v jejm pohledu na teorii a praxi, jejich provzanost autorka ukazuje.
Nsledujc st se zabv konkrtnmi aspekty vuky, jako jsou
pesnost a plynulost projevu, zptn vazba nebo prce ve dvojicch. Autorka
dokld celou adu praktickch aktivit pro vuku komunikativnch dovednost,
kter se zamuj pedevm na ncvik plynulosti projevu.
Vzkumn st prce, kterou je srovnvac studie zaloen na
empirickm vzkumu mezi eskmi a rakouskmi uiteli anglitiny, naznauje,
e vuka eovch dovednost se v obou zemch li v mnoha ohledech. Patrn
jsou nzorov rozdly na vuku jazyka a jeho akvizici, pes odlin pstupy a
innosti, kter uitel pouvaj, a po to, do jak mry dosahuje vuka spchu.
234
English resume
This thesis investigates teaching speaking skills from a broader perspective in
relation to communicative competence. The thesis is divided into four parts
outlining the aims of the thesis in the first, providing a theoretical background
in the second, presenting practical techniques for teaching speaking in the third
and closing with an empirical research into the ways speaking skills are taught
in the Czech Republic and Austria.
At the beginning, the thesis considers the aspects which distinguish
speech from written language, underlining a different organisation of speech,
importance of context and making a distinction between two types of
communicative exchanges. The thesis emphasises the fact that teaching
speaking is to be viewed from a broader perspective encompassing all
dimensions of communicative competence: linguistic, sociolingustic, discourse
and strategic and links all the above to its possible classroom implications.
The subsequent part discusses the concepts of accuracy and fluency,
corrective feedback and pair work and presents a great variety of practical
techniques for teaching speaking focusing on tasks which develop fluency.
In the research part, a comparative study based on empirical research carried
out among Czech and Austrian teachers of English is presented. The research
indicates that teaching speaking in the two countries differs on many levels
ranging from the assumptions about language teaching and acquisition,
through different approaches and techniques teachers use, down to the
differences in terms of how successful teachers are in mediating language
learners knowledge and skills and creating a truly communicative environment.
235