Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1/3
7/19/2014
2/3
7/19/2014
Even a bad outside antenna may work better than a good indoor antenna.
Typical construction materials used in a house can easily result in 10-15db (or more) of additional
attenuation - and that amount of loss is difficult to make up with a reasonably-sized indoor antenna.
It should come as no surprise, then, when even a very poorly performing antenna is placed outside
- even when fed with a lossy coaxial cable - it is likely to outperform nearly any indoor antenna to
which it may be compared. In other words, it is possible that a rubber duck antenna on the roof
may work better than a "real" antenna inside a house!
Placing an indoor antenna near a window can help the situation - if you happen to have one that
faces the right direction - but be aware that some energy-saving window coatings can be very lossy
at RF.
Beware coax loss and "false" matches.
It should also be noted that at higher frequencies - such as 70 cm - even a few 10's of feet of a
small cable such as RG-58 can have very high losses. These losses not only "eat" both transmit and
receive signals, but they can cause a false sense of security: Even an extremely high SWR on
the far end of the cable can, when such losses are involved, appear to be perfectly
acceptable, thus masking problems
If you choose to build antennas, you can find good (and bad!) advice all over the web. For a handy reference, I
would strongly recommend obtaining a copy of the ARRL Antenna Book (even an old version!) as it has a
reasonable balance of practical antenna designs plus the theory and formulae required to design your own!
20140226
Since 12/2010:
http://www.ka7oei.com/yagi_notes1.html
3/3