Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Renewable Energy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/renene
Wave energy potential along the northern coasts of the Gulf of Oman, Iran
A. Saket, A. Etemad-Shahidi*
Hydro-environment COE, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 16765-163, Tehran, Iran
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 7 March 2011
Accepted 14 September 2011
Available online 7 October 2011
This study aims to investigate wave power along the northern coasts of the Gulf of Oman. To simulate
wave parameters the third generation spectral SWAN model was utilized, and the results were validated
with buoy and ADCP data. First, annual energy was calculated in the study region with the hindcast data
set covering 23 years (1985e2007). The areas with the highest wave resource were determined and the
area proximity to the port of Chabahar is suggested as the best site for the installation of a wave farm.
Second, the average monthly wave energy in this area was investigated. The most energetic waves are
provided by the southeast Indian Ocean monsoon from June to August. Finally, the wave energy resource
was characterized in terms of sea state parameters. It was found that the bulk of annual wave energy
occurs for signicant wave heights between 1 and 3 m and energy periods between 4 and 8 s in the
direction of SSE.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Renewable energy
Wave energy
Wave climate
Gulf of Oman
SWAN
1. Introduction
Growing energy consumption in the world and traditional
methods of energy production have led to serious environmental
problems. Nowadays, a long-term goal of a 50% reduction in global
greenhouse emissions before 2050 has been set by the Kyoto
protocol [1]. Renewable energy sources have a key role in the
reduction of air pollution, especially CO2 emission. Several energy
sources which can be a good alternative for fossil energy are solar,
wind and ocean energy (i.e. wave, tide and current). These sources
of energy currently provide only a small amount of energy in worldwide [2], although they are expected to play a greater role in future
energy provision.
Among the novel renewable energy sources, wave energy is one
of the most promising [3]. Wave energy is seen as an enormous
source of renewable energy with limited negative environmental
impacts [4,5]. This kind of energy is more persistent than other
sources of energy. The wave power ow just below the sea surface
is about ve times larger than that of wind power ow at the level
19.5 m above the sea surface [6]. Wave energy is unevenly
distributed over the globe and depends on the geographical location and time [7,8]. The potential of world-wide wave energy in
deep water has been estimated between 1 and 10 TW, which is
comparable with the worlds power consumption [9]. Although
50
91
55
60
N
30
30
IRAN
Chabahar
Persian Gulf
25
25
Gulf of Oman
ADCP Location
Buoy Location
km
0
50
55
400
200
60
Fig. 1. The Gulf of Oman and the locations of buoy and ADCP [17].
NORTH
10%
8%
6%
4%
>= 9.0
2%
WEST
EAST
7.0 - 9.0
5.0 - 7.0
2.0 - 5.0
SOUTH
Fig. 2. Wind rose of the study area, 1985e2007.
92
3. Methods
J rg
Z2p ZN
Cg f ; hSf ; qdf dq
(1)
Cg f ; h
g
4pf
1
2kh
tan hkh
sin h2kh
(2)
rg 2
4p
Z2p ZN
f 1 Sf ; qdf dq
(3)
(9)
where E(s,q) is the energy density with s the relative frequency (i.e.
the radian frequency in a frame of reference moving with current
velocity) and q the propagation direction (i.e. the direction normal
to the wave crest of each spectral component).
The SWAN model solves the spectral action balance equation for
the Cartesian coordinates [25]:
v
v
v
v
v
S
N cx N cy N cs N cq N
s
vt
vx
vy
vs
vq
(10)
The rst term on the left-hand side shows the local rate of
change of action density in time, the next two terms represent the
propagation of action in geographical space where cx and cy are the
propagation velocity in the x and y-spaces, respectively. The fourth
term represents the shifting of the relative frequency due to variations in depths and currents in which, cs is the propagation
velocity in the s-space. The last term on the left-hand side
demonstrates depth-induced and current-induced refraction and
propagation in directional space in which, cq is the propagation
velocity in the q-space [24]. The term S S(s,q) represents sources
or sinks of wave energy. This term shows the effects of generation,
dissipation (by whitecapping, bottom friction and depth-induced
wave breaking) and nonlinear waveewave interactions. Further
details can be found in [24,25,29]. In this study, SWAN cycle III
version 40.72AB [30] was employed.
Z2p ZN
mn
0
f n Sf ; qdf dq
(4)
The energy period (Te) of the sea state and the signicant wave
height (Hs) in terms of the spectral moment respectively are given
by:
Te T1;0
m1
m0
(5)
(6)
Therefore, the wave energy ux per unit width of the progressing wave front in terms of energy period and signicant wave
height in deep water is approximated:
rg2
Te Hs2 y0:5Te Hs2 kW=m
64p
(7)
JWEC Jb
(8)
93
Fig. 3. Comparison between the modeled and buoy recorded parameters, calibration period: (a) signicant wave height; (b) wave energy.
MAPE
1 X jxi yi j
100
n
xi
(11)
Table 1
The summary of statistical analysis of the calibration period.
Hs (m)
J (kW/m)
MAPE (%)
R
MAPE (%)
R
12.8
0.80
8.6
0.85
P
xi xyi y
R q
P
P
xi x2 yi y2
(12)
Fig. 4. Comparison between the modeled and buoy recorded parameters, verication period: (a) signicant wave height; (b) wave energy.
94
Measured
6.0
Modeled
Wave Height ( m)
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
11/05/2007
16/05/2007
21/05/2007
26/05/2007
31/05/2007
5/06/2007
10/06/2007
Time
Fig. 5. Comparison between the modeled and ADCP recorded parameters, verication period: (a) signicant wave height; (b) wave energy.
Table 2
The summary of statistical analysis of the verication period.
J (kW/m)
MAPE (%)
R
MAPE (%)
R
Buoy
ADCP
27.2
0.84
16.7
0.87
19.0
0.70
9.2
0.78
25.6
Sistan va Baluchestan
25.5
Latitude ()
Hs (m)
25.4
25.3
25.2
Gulf of Oman
25.1
Chabahar port
C
D
25.0
59
59.5
60
Longitude ()
60.5
Baluchestan Province is located near the site D (Fig. 6). The port of
Chabahar is a free trade-industrial zone. Because of its establishment near the Indian Ocean, it is the center of business, trade and
navigation in this province. Thus, site D is suggested the best area
for the installation of a wave farm.
Table 3
The location, water depth, distance to the coastline and annual wave energy of sites
A to D.
Station
ID
Latitude
( ) N
Longitude
( ) E
Depth
(m)
Distance to
coastline (km)
Jmean
(kW/m)
A
B
C
D
25.28
25.32
25.28
25.22
59.27
59.87
60.14
60.47
38.2
41
40.9
38
17
4.5
7
7.5
2.7
2.82
2.78
2.72
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Jan
Jul
95
Month
Fig. 7. Monthly average wave energy (kW/m), Site D.
NORTH
NORTH
25%
35%
20%
28%
15%
21%
10%
14%
5%
7%
WEST
EAST
WEST
SOUTH
EAST
SOUTH
NORTH
c
15%
12%
Hs (m)
9%
>= 3.0
6%
2.0 - 3.0
3%
WEST
EAST
1.0 - 2.0
0.5 - 1.0
SOUTH
Fig. 8. Wave height roses from (a) January to May, (b) June to August and (c) September to December, site D.
96
Table 4
Annual wave energy corresponding to sea states in different ranges of Hs and Te, and
the percentage of the total annual energy, site D.
Hs (m)
Te (s)
<2
2e4
>4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 78.77 69.80 9.47
0.00
0.00
0.53
0.48 0.03
0.00 34.22 207.95 26.33 0.00
0.00
0.69
2.77
0.24 0.00
0.33 215.08 126.26 59.38 0.00
0.04 13.16
4.18
1.29 0.00
46.29 125.58
7.75
0.45 0.00
15.51 25.97
0.87
0.09 0.00
9.51 18.91
3.54
0.27 0.00
11.75 14.48
7.29
0.63 0.00
56.13 393.78 424.26 156.22 9.47
27.30 54.30 15.64
2.73 0.03
E (kWh/m)
% Total
3e4
E (kWh/m)
% Total
2e3
E (kWh/m)
% Total
1e2
E (kWh/m)
% Total
0.5e1 E (kWh/m)
% Total
<0.5 E (kWh/m)
% Total
Total E (kWh/m)
% Total
4e6
6e8
8e10
Table 5
Percentage of total time in an average year of sea states in different ranges of mean
wave direction and Hs, site D.
Direction
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
SSW
SW
WSW
W
WNW
NW
NNW
Total
Hs (m)
<0.5
0.5e1
1e2
2e3
3e4
>4
Total
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.13
0.41
1.32
6.73
9.98
9.11
5.16
0.95
0.19
0.05
0.01
0.01
34.15
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.07
0.24
0.60
3.17
13.34
10.04
7.85
6.16
0.80
0.09
0.02
0.00
0.01
42.45
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.07
0.14
2.04
6.07
3.51
2.97
3.38
0.44
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
18.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.49
1.46
0.41
0.53
0.74
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.39
0.02
0.10
0.36
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.06
0.13
0.44
1.16
7.16
27.99
23.97
20.55
15.80
2.28
0.30
0.07
0.02
0.02
100.00
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Islamic Republic of Iran Meteorological Organization (IRIMO) for providing the buoy and wind
data and JPLPO.DAAC for providing the QuikSCAT data. The authors
would also thank the SWAN group at the Delft University of Technology (Department of Fluid Mechanics) for providing the freely
available model. We also thank MH Moeini and B Kamranzad for
their helpful suggestions; and D Keech for editing the manuscript.
This study was supported by the Deputy of Research, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST).
References
[1] zger M. Prediction of ocean wave energy from meteorological variables by
fuzzy logic modeling. Expert Systems with Applications 2011;38:6269e74.
[2] Pryor SC, Barthelmie RJ. Climate change impacts on wind energy: a review.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010;14:430e7.
[3] Iglesias G, Lpez M, Carballo R, Castro A, Fraguela JA, Frigaard P. Wave energy
potential in Galicia (NW Spain). Renewable Energy 2009;34:2323e33.
[4] Leijon M, Bernhoff H, Berg M, gren O. Economical considerations of renewable electric energy productioneespecially development of wave energy.
Renewable Energy 2003;28:1201e9.
[5] Clment A, McCullen P, Falco A, Fiorentino A, Gardner F, Hammarlund K,
et al. Wave energy in Europe: current status and perspectives. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews 2002;6:405e31.
[6] Falnes J. A review of wave-energy extraction. Marine Structures 2007;20:
185e201.
97
[20] Teixeira JC, Abreu MP, Guedes Soares C. Uncertainty of ocean wave hindcasts
due to wind modelling. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
1995;117:294e7.
[21] Holthuijsen LH, Booji N, Bertotti L. The propagation of wind errors through
ocean wave hindcasts. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
1996;118:184e9.
[22] Ponce de Len S, Ocampo-Torres FJ. Sensitivity of a wave model to wind
variability. Journal of Geophysical Research 1998;103:3179e201.
[23] Ponce de Len S, Guedes Soares C. Sensitivity of wave model predictions to
wind elds in the Western Mediterranean sea. Coastal Engineering 2008;55:
920e9.
[24] Booij N, Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH. A third-generation wave model for coastal
regions 1. Model description and validation. Journal of Geophysical Research
C: Oceans 1999;104:7649e66.
[25] Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH, Booij N. A third-generation wave model for coastal
regions 2. Verication. Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans 1999;104:
7667e81.
[26] WAMDI group. The WAM model - a third generation ocean wave prediction
model. Journal of Physical Oceanography 1988;18:1775e810.
[27] Komen GJ, Hasselmann S, Hasselmann K. On the existence of a fully developed
wind-sea spectrum. Journal of Physical Oceanography 1984;14:1271e85.
[28] Bolaos-Sanchez R, Sanchez-Arcilla A, Cateura J. Evaluation of two atmospheric models for wind-wave modelling in the NW Mediterranean. Journal of
Marine Systems 2007;65:336e53.
[29] Holthuijsen LH, Booij N, Herbers THC. A prediction model for stationary,
short-crested waves in shallow water with ambient currents. Coastal Engineering 1989;13:23e54.
[30] The SWAN team. SWAN user manual (Cycle III version 40.72AB). Delft: Delft
University of Technology; 2009.
[31] Hurdle DP, Van Vledder GP. Improved spectral wave modelling of whitecapping dissipation in swell sea systems; 2004. pp. 539e544.
[32] Moeini MH, Etemad-Shahidi A. Application of two numerical models for wave
hindcasting in Lake Erie. Applied Ocean Research 2007;29:137e45.