Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
I EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
B ex
0
0.91
10
1.86
20
1.87
30
0.92
1
1.43
11
1.87
21
1.87
2
1.65
12
1.87
22
1.87
3
1.75
13
1.87
23
1.86
4
1.80
14
1.88
24
1.85
5
1.83
15
1.88
25
1.85
6
1.84
16
1.88
26
1.81
7
1.85
17
1.88
27
1.76
8
1.86
18
1.88
28
1.66
9
1.86
19
1.88
29
1.45
B 0=
I0
0 . r
. I 0 . n0 . ( cos 1cos 2 )
2
n 750
n0= =
=2500
L 0.3
I 0 =I . 2( A )
cos 1=
x
x
= 2 2
r1 R + x
cos 2=
Lx
Lx
= 2
r2
R +( Lx)2
X(cm) 0
1
2
3
4
B(mT) 0.89 1.28 1.51 1.62 1.68
X(cm) 10
11
12
13
14
B(mT) 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76 1.76
X(cm) 20
21
22
23
24
B(mT) 1.76 1.75 1.75 1.74 1.73
X(cm) 30
B(mT) 0.89
b) Evaluation of the obtained measurement
5
1.71
15
1.76
25
1.71
6
1.73
16
1.76
26
1.68
7
1.74
17
1.76
27
1.62
8
1.75
18
1.76
28
1.51
9
1.75
19
1.76
29
1.28
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
B (mt)
1
B-ex
B-th
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
I (a)
U(V)
3
6
9
12
B(mT)
0.67
1.23
1.79
2.40
B(mT)
3
2.5
2
B(mT)
1.5
B(mT)
Linear (B(mT))
1
0.5
0
2
10
12
14
U(v)
2. B=0.02 mT
We see that :
- The magnetic field is proportional with the intensity.
- The graph of function B(U) should be a line go through the origin and
monotonic increasin
c). Comparison of experimental and theoretical magnetic field
Trial
1
2
3
- I=0.4A
x(cm)
0
15
30
U =9V
cos 1=
x
x
= 2 2
r 1 r +x
cos 2=
Lx
Lx
= 2
r2
R +( Lx )2
B(mT)
0.92
1.90
0.95
B=
0 r
I n ( cos 1cos 2 )
2 0
I0
is calculated as:
I 0 =I 2=0.566 ( A )
Result:
B (mT )
Position of the
probe x(cm)
cos 1
cos 2
B=|Bth Bex|
Theorical
0.000
-0.998
15
0.991
-0.991
30
0.998
0.000
Experimental
Conclusion:
- The theoretical result is quite close to the experimental result, we can conclude
that the measurement is precise.
- These difference is caused by random error of tool and environment.