Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Chem 115
Reviews:
Heathcock, C. H. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Trost, B. M.; Fleming, I., Eds., Pergamon
Press: New York, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 133-238.
Kim, B. M.; Williams, S. F.; Masamune, S. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Trost, B. M.;
Fleming, I., Eds., Pergamon Press: New York, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 239-275.
Note: the enantiomeric transition states (not shown) are, by definition, of equal energies. The
pericyclic transition state determines syn/anti selectivity. To differentiate two syn or two anti
transition states, a chiral element must be introduced (e.g., R1, R2, or L), thereby creating
diastereomeric transition states which, by definition, are of different energies.
Paterson, I. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Trost, B. M.; Fleming, I., Eds., Pergamon
Press: New York, 1991, Vol. 2, pp. 301-319.
(E)-enolates
O
2
H3C
OH O
H
OML2
R1
The aldol reaction was discovered by Aleksandr Porfir'evich Borodin in 1872 where he first
observed the formation of "aldol", 3-hydroxybutanal, from acetaldehyde under the influence of
catalysts such as hydrochloric acid or zinc chloride.
H3C
H
H3C
R1
H
R2
O
L
R1
R2
CH3
anti
FAVORED
CH3
R1
R2
O
R2CHO
H3C
OH
O
L
OH
R1
H
DISFAVORED
R2
CH3
syn
R1
H
(Z)-enolates
H
R1
R2
CH3
OML2
CH3
O
L
R1
R2
syn
L
R1
R2
O
H
CH3
(Z)- and (E)-enolates afford syn- and anti-aldol adducts, respectively, by minimizing
1,3-diaxial interactions between R1 and R2 in each chair-like TS.
CH3
FAVORED
R2CHO
OH
Zimmerman and Traxler proposed that the aldol reaction with metal enolates proceeds via a
chair-like, pericyclic process. In practice, the stereochemistry can be highly metal dependent.
Only a few metals, such as boron, reliably follow the indicated pathways.
M
O
DISFAVORED
O
L
OH
R1
R2
CH3
anti
Heathcock, C. H.; Buse, C. T.; Kleschnick, W. A.; Pirrung, M. C.; Sohn, J. E.; Lampe, J. J.
Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 1066-1081.
M. Movassaghi
Myers
(n-Bu)2BOTf
CH3
Et
iPr2NEt, Et2O
78 C, 30 min
Et
OB(n-Bu)2
CH3
78 C
OB(c-Hex)2
Et3N, Et2O
78 C, 10 min
CH3
>99% (E)
(n-Bu)2BOTf
CH2Cl2
O
O
O
O
OTf
CH3
N
Bn
OH
Et
Ph
CH3
75%
CH3
syn >99%
78 C
Et
Bn O
Ph
CH3
PhCHO
n-Bu
n-Bu
OH
Et
77%
(c-Hex)2BCl
CH3
PhCHO
>97% (Z)
Et
Chem 115
anti >97%
n-Bu
H
B
n-Bu
n-Bu
O
H3C
H
Bn
In the case of dialkylboron chlorides the geometry of the product enolates is much more
sensitive to variations in the amine and the alkyl groups on boron.
i-Pr2NEt
n-Bu
n-Bu
O
The combination of (c-Hex)2BCl and Et3N provides the (E)-boron enolate preferentially.
O
O
H
Bn
i-Pr2NEt
n-Bu
n-Bu
O
N
CH3
O
H
DISFAVORED
FAVORED
Dialkylboron triflates typically afford (Z)-boron enolates, with little sensitivity toward the amine
used or the steric requirements of the alkyl groups on the boron reagent.
n-Bu
H
B
O
CH3
N
CH3
Bn
Bn
Evans, D. A.; Vogel, E.; Nelson, J. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 6120-6123.
Observed selectivity > 100:1 Z : E.
Evans, D. A.; Takacs, J. M.; McGee, L. R.; Ennis, M. D.; Mathre, D. J.; Bartroli, J. Pure & Appl.
Chem. 1981, 53, 1109-1127.
Brown, H. C.; Dhar, R. K.; Bakshi, R. K.; Pandiarajan, P. K.; Singaram, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 3441-3442.
Evans, D. A.; Takacs, J. M.; McGee, L. R.; Ennis, M. D.; Mathre, D. J.; Bartroli, J. Pure Appl.
Chem. 1981, 53, 1109-1127.
M. Movassaghi
Myers
Chem 115
B
CH3
Bn OB(n-Bu)2
CH3
N
O
O
Dipole-dipole interactions within the imide are minimized in the reactive conformation (see:
Noe, E. A.; Raban, M J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 5811-5820).
n-Bu
n-Bu
CH3
Bn
Bn
UNREACTIVE
RCHO
CH3
O
H3C
CH3
N
O
O
Bn
H
O
N
n-Bu
B
n-Bu
vs.
n-Bu
n-Bu
n-Bu
Bn O
Bn O
N
O
n-Bu
R
O
CH3
n-Bu
B
CH3
CH3 O
Ph
OH
N
O
O
R
CH3
DISFAVORED
n-Bu
2. RCHO
78 " 23 C
OH
N
O
1. n-Bu2BOTf, i-Pr2NEt
CH2Cl2, 0 C
R
CH3
FAVORED
CH3
N
O
O
O
R
CH3
O
H
Ph
CH3
O
H3C
2. RCHO
78 " 23 C
CH3 O
H
Bn
1. n-Bu2BOTf, i-Pr2NEt
CH2Cl2, 0 C
R
CH3
imide
aldehyde
(CH3)2CHCHO
(CH3)2CHCHO
n-C4H9CHO
n-C4H9CHO
C6H5CHO
C6H5CHO
aRatio
diastereomerica
ratio
yield (%)
497:1
<1:500
141:1
<1:500
>500:1
<1:500
78
91
75
95
88
89
A variety of chiral imides can be used for highly selective aldol reactions.
Bn O
N
O
O
Bn O
OH
R
CH3
O
O
OH
R
CH3
Evans, D. A.; Bartroli, J.; Shih, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2127-2129.
Evans, D. A.; Takacs, J. M.; McGee, L. R.; Ennis, M. D.; Mathre, D. J. Bartroli, J. Pure & Appl.
Chem. 1981, 53, 1109-1127.
Myers
Chem 115
or
LiOH
O
O
+
OH
substrate
reagent
N
H
Br
Bn
LiAlH4, THF
Br
HO
CH3
CH3 CH2
78 ! 0 C
CH3 CH2
90%
Bn
H CH3
H
N
O
O
LiOOH
LiOH
76
16
100
H3C
H3C
CH3
CH3 O
Ph
HO
Reductive cleavage:
LiOOH
OH
Ph
H3C
O
LiOOH
98
<1
LiOH
43
30
O
aYield
H
O
CH3
Ph
CH3
OBOM OBn
CH3
CH3
77%
H3C
OBOM OBn
H3C
BnO
H
O
O
CH3
BnOLi
THF, 0 C
LiOOH displays the greatest regioselectivity for attack of the exocyclic carbonyl group.
CH3
H3C
CH3
O
O
CH3
CH3
CH3
Transamination:
O
Bn
OH
N
N3
H3CO
O
LiOOH
O
THF, H2O;
NHBoc
Na2SO3
OBn
0 C
O
96%
OBn
Bn
CH3
Al(CH3)3
CH3 CH3ONHCH3HCl
CH2Cl2, 0 C
NHBoc
OBn
CH3
N3
H3CO
OH
O
CH3O
OH
CH3
N
CH3 OBn
CH3
92%
A free "-hydroxyl group is required.
Weinreb amides can be readily converted into ketones or aldehydes (see: Nahm, S.;
Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815-3818).
Evans, D. A.; Bender, S. L.; Morris, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2506-2526.
M. Movassaghi
Myers
Chem 115
Cytovaricin:
H3C
CH3
O
H
H3C
CH3 O
Ph
Ph
O
CH3
CH3
CH3 O
Ph
Ph
CH3
N
N
CH3
H3C
CH3O
LDA, Et2O,
THF, 0 C;
45, 90 %
N
CH3 CH3
CH3
H3CO
OH
OBn
N
CH3 CH3
H
CH3
O
H
t-Bu
CH3
N
OCH3
t-Bu
Si
OCH2OCH2CCl3
OBn
CH3 CH3
HH O
CHO
H
TESO CH3
O
HO
OCH2OCH2CCl3
CH3
+
H3C
TESO
PhSO2
t-Bu
Si t-Bu
O
O
CH3
OTES
H
O
OCH3
CH3
OTES
CH3
H
H3C
HO
H
H3C
DEIPSO
H
CH3
O
H
H
CH3
83%
O
OPMB
CH3
92%
H3C
H3C
DEIPSO
H3C
TBSO
OCH2OCH2CCl3
CH3
OPMB
CH3
TBSO
H3C
H
H
OH
1. n-Bu2BOTf, Et3N
CH2Cl2, 78 C
2. Al(CH3)3, THF
CH3ONHCH3HCl
OPMB
CH3
N
H
N
O H3C
O TESO
HO
H
H
OBn
92%
H3C
DEIPSO
H3C CH3
H3C
O
+
O TESO
CH3
PMBO
Ph
O
H
CH3
CH3
1. n-Bu2BOTf, Et3N
CH2Cl2, 78 C;
RCHO
2. Al(CH3)3, THF
CH3ONHCH3HCl
91%
CH3
Ph
CH3
CH3
H3C
OPMB
1. Al(CH3)3
CH3ONHCH3HCl
THF, 0 C
2. TESCl, Im. DMF
H
H
OH
H3C CH3
87%
CH3
N
H3C
n-Bu2BOTf, Et3N
CH2Cl2, 0 C;
RCHO
78 ! 23 C;
H2O2, 0 C
92%
OH O
OPMB
PMB = p-Methoxybenzyl
n-Bu2BOTf, Et3N
CH2Cl2, 0 C;
RCHO, 78;
H2O2, 0 C
H3C
DEIPSO
TBSO
CH3 O
H
H
H
H3C
H
O
H
CH3
OCH2OCH2CCl3
CH3
DEIPS = diethylisopropylsilyl
O
H
O
OH
Cytovaricin
O
O O
CH3 CH3
H
HO
OH O
CH3
OH
CH3
OH
OH OCH3
CH3
O
OH
Evans, D. A.; Kaldor, S. W.; Jones, T. K.; Clardy, J.; Stout, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
7001-7031.
M. Movassaghi
Myers
H3C
L H
H
Sn
O
L O
R
Sn(OTf)2
Et3N, CH2Cl2
RCHO, 20 C
O
O
Xp
O
O
CH3
TiCl4
i-Pr2NEt, CH2Cl2
RCHO
78 " 0 C
enolization
conditions
A
CH3
R
CH3
RCHOa
H3C
CH3
H3C
B
A
CHO
CHO
CH2
H3C
CHO
B
A
B
CHO
Bn
OH
O
CH3 CH3
Bn
1. (c-Hex)2BCl
EtN(CH3)2, Et2O
CH3
0 C, 1 h
CH3
O
O
Cl
Cl
aldehyde
yield %a
OH
Bn
CH3 CH3
R + O
OH
CH3 CH3
R
CH3 CH3
Bn
syn-anti
anti-anti
ratio
anti-anti : syn-anti
78
84:16
CH2=C(CH3)CHO
72
92:8
CH3CH2CHO
70b
80:20
PhCH2CH2CHO
84b
88:12
84
97:3
CHO
CH3
aIsolated
83
95:5
86
<1:99
77c
95:5
Enolization of the less hindered side of the ketone under Brown's conditions affords the
(E)-boron enolate.
64c
2:98
71
79:21
86
<1:99
85
89:11
81
4:96
a1.0-1.1
OH
(CH3)2CHCHO
Ph
ratio
anti-syn : syn-syn
Bn
syn-syn
yield %b
anti-syn
Cl
TI
2. RCHO
78 C, 3h
Xp
B
A
H3C
H
CH3
N
Bn
Chem 115
bIsolated
The C2 stereocenter is the dominant control element in these aldol reactions; "matched" vs.
"mismatched" effects of the remote auxiliary are negligible.
O
RCHO
Si face
OH
RL
R
CH3 CH3
O
RL
CH3 CH3
H3C O
RL
H
Re face
syn-anti, predicted
CH3
O
RCHO
OH
RL
R
CH3 CH3
anti-anti, observed
The sense of asymmetric induction observed in these reactions was unexpected
and opposite to a prediction based on a reactant-like transition state model minimizing
A(1,3) strain.
Evans, D. A.; Ng, H. P.; Clark, J. S.; Reiger, D. L. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 2127-2142.
M. Movassaghi
Myers
Chem 115
O
O
CH3
N
Bn
CH3
BnO
CH3
O
BzO
CH3
CH3
R1
In addition to !-ketoimides, the two chiral ethyl ketones above are known to undergo aldol
reactions at the unexpected Re face of the enolate, deilvering anti-anti aldol products.
R1
R1
CH3
TBSO
H3C
O
CH3
1. (c-Hex)2BCl
Et3N, Et2O
0 C
2. i-PrCHO
78 C
CH3 CH3
1,3-anti-diol
OAc
B OAc
R2
O
OH OH
R1
+
H O
R2
1,3-syn-diol
DISFAVORED
TBSO
H3C
2. i-PrCHO
78 C
CH3 CH3
R2
R2
R1
FAVORED
(CH3)4NBH(OAc)3
1. (c-Hex)2BCl
Et3N, Et2O
0 C
OH OH
R2
OH O
Paterson, I.; Goodman, J. M.; Isaka, M. Tet. Lett. 1989, 30, 7121-7124.
Paterson, I.; Wallace, D. J.; Cowden, C. J. Synthesis 1998, 639-652.
TBSO
H3C
H OAc
O+
B OAc
O
H
CH3
OH
CH3
The reactivity of the reagent is attenuated such that the reduction of ketones proceeds
at convenient rates only intramolecularly, favoring formation of 1,3-anti-diols.
90%, 88% de
TBSO
H3C
OH
OH O
CH3
R1
BH4
H
Zn(BH4)2
R1
R2
L
Zn
OH OH
R1
1,3-syn-diol
R2
75%, 92% de
R2
The C2 stereocenter is believed to be the dominant control element for both substrates.
TBSO
H3C
OB(c-Hex)2
CH(i-Pr)OTBS
CH3 c-Hex
H
B
c-Hex
O
O
H3C
OH
R
Minimization of A(1,3) interactions in the enolate biases the approach of the aldehyde to the
methyl-bearing "-face of the enolate, while the (E)-enolate geometry affords anti-aldol products.
CH3 O
Ph
OH
CH3
N
O
O
CH3 CH3
NaBH(OAc)3
AcOH, CH3CN
25 C, 30 min
CH3 O
Ph
OH OH
CH3
N
O
O
CH3 CH3
99%, >96% de
Evans, D. A.; Chapman, K. T.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3560-3578.
Jaron Mercer, M. Movassaghi
Myers
Chem 115
Premonensin
O
O
CH3
+ H
CH3
Bn
O
CH3
O
CH3 +
CH3 CH3
Bn
Sn(OTf)2
N-ethylpiperidine
CH2Cl2, 78 C
24:1
X = OCH3
32:1
91
X = NO2
7:1
71
X = Ph, Y = H
21:1
92
X = Ph, Y = CH3
28:1
92
X = H, Y = CH3
16:1
77
"-napthaldehyde
14:1
91
furfural
6:1
80
NaBH(OAc)3
AcOH
Y
X
CH3
Bn
H3C CH3
NO2
Silylation of the magnesium alkoxide in the aldol product turns over the magnesium.
O
O
H
CH3
CH3
H3C
CH3 CH3
OH
H3C CH3
O
CH3
2, LDA, THF
78 C; 1
H3CO OCH3
+ H3C
NO2
Use of the analogous N-acylthiazolidinethione chiral auxiliary affords products of the opposite
anti-stereochemistry in comparable yields and with high selectivities.
H3CO OCH3
CH3
CH3 CH3 CH3
CH3
CH3
H3C
OH OH OH
58%
H3C
CH3
CH3 +
O
H
EtOAc, 23 C
2. 5:1 THF/1 N HCl
S
S
OH
N
Bn
R
CH3
O
CH3
CH3
Bn
HO
CH3 CH3 CH3
CH3 CH3
h!, THF, 0 C;
H2O, HCl, 25 C
O
CHO
OH OH
Bn
X = CH3
91%, >94 de
O
R
CH3
yield (%)
Bn
dr
CHO
CH3
OH
EtOAc, 23 C
aldehyde
OH
2. TFA; CH3OH
94%, 94% de
O
CH3 CH3
Both reactions are proposed to proceed through boat transition states. See: Evans, D. A.;
Downey, W. C.; Shaw, J. T.; Tedrow, J. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1127-1130.
Premonensin
M. Movassaghi
Myers
Chem 115
Heathcock and coworkers reported that complexation of the aldehyde with an added Lewis
acid allows access to non-Evans syn and anti aldol products via open transition states.
Bu
O
O
CH3
Bu2BOTf, i-Pr2NEt,
CH2Cl2;
Bu
B
O
CH3
O
R H
t-Bu
NaBH4, I2
NH2
HO
Bn
S
t-Bu
CS2, KOH
non-Evans syn
Lewis acid
anti:syn*
yield (%)*
SnCl4
10:90
66
TiCl4
12:88
72
TiCl4
8:92
65
Bn
NH2
HO
THF
95%
Bn
CH3
LA
OH
NH
CH2Cl2
95%
O H
S
Cl2CS, Et3N
NH
H2O
80%
Bn
Crimmins, M. T; King, B. W.; Tabet, E. A.; Chaudhary, K. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 894-902.
H3C
CHO
Ph CHO
S
S
Bu
O
O
O
N
CH3
Bu2BOTf, i-Pr2NEt,
CH2Cl2;
O
O
Bu
B
N
O R
O
CH3
H H O
LA
i-Pr
H3C
CHO
PhCHO
N
Bn
CH3
S
S
2. RCHO, 0 C
OH
N
Bn
S
+
Bn
()-sparteine (equiv)
yield (%)
CH2=CHCHO
1.0
49
>99:1
i-PrCHO
1.0
60
98:2
anti:syn*
yield (%)*
CH2=CHCHO
2.0
77
<1:99
Et2AlCl
88:12
81
i-PrCHO
2.0
75
3:97
Et2AlCl
74:26
62
Gauche interactions around the forming C-C bond dictate which face of the aldehyde reacts. For
small Lewis acids, transition state 1 is favored. For large Lewis acids, transition state 2 is
favored.
Walker, M. A.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5747-5750.
R
CH3
B
A:B
Lewis acid
*Determined by 1H NMR. Yield given is the total yield of diastereomeric aldol mixture.
OH
CH3
RCHO
i-Pr
anti
R
CH3
OH
Myers
Chem 115
Proposed transition states provide a rationale for the selectivity dependence on amine equivalents:
S
CH3
S
TiCl4
()-sparteine (1 equiv)
RCHO
H
Bn
HR
Cl
N
S
Cl
TI
Cl
H
O
R
CH3
CH3
OR
1. TiCl4, ()-sparteine
O
N
OH
S
Bn
CH3
HO
CH3
CH3
PhCH2NH2
79%
NaBH4
83%
i-Bu
DIBAL-H
69%
O
OH
i-Pr
R
CH3
CH3OH
imidazole
79%
CH3
OH
R'
OR
Bn
yield (%)
aldehyde
A : B : syn
allyl
H3CCHO
94 : 6 : 0
84
allyl
Ph CHO
65 : 24 : 11
56
94 : 6 : 0
74
95 : 5 : 0
58
88 : 12 : 0
64
74 : 26 : 0
48
84 : 11 : 5
63
88 : 12 : 0
59
CHO
CH3
CHO
CHO
Bn
CH3
OH
CHO
CH3
CHO
CH3
CHO
i-Pr
CH3
Complexation of the aldehyde with excess titanium occurs in situ to give anti products with high
selectivity.
OH
N
S
OR
CH3
BnHN
Ph
R'
Bn
S
+
OH
N
Bn
OH
Bn
allyl
2. TiCl4, R'CHO
allyl
S
TiLx
Bn
Bn
H
TiCl4
()-sparteine (2 equiv)
RCHO
Bn
S
H
OH
The proposed transition state is analogous to that of the anti-selective Heathcock aldol.
CH3ONHCH3HCl
imidazole
77%
O
OH
CH3O
N
CH3 CH3
S
i-Pr
i-Pr
CH3O
L4
Ti
O R'
N
H H
t-Bu
R
O
O
TiL4
CH3
The thiazolidinethione auxiliary is recovered by basic extraction (1 M NaOH) of the product
mixture.
Crimmins, M. T.; King, B. W.; Tabet, E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7883-7884.
Crimmins, M. T.; Chaudhary, K. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 775-777.
M. Movassaghi, Jaron Mercer
Myers
Chem 115
The isothiocyanate below serves as a chiral glycine equivalent. Stannous triflate-mediated aldol
reactions give cyclized aldol adducts in high yield and diastereoselectivity.
2-Chloro- and 2-Bromoacetyl imides undergo aldol addition with high diastereoselectivity.
O
O
Sn(OTf)2,
NCS N-ethylpiperidine;
Bn
R
N
RCHO
Bn
OSnL
O
HN
Bn
RCHO
Ph
CH3
ratio*
H3CCHO
91:9
PhCHO
H3C
CHO
yield (%)
91
99:1
92
CH3
94:6
CH3
HOCH3
Bn
67
PhCHO
97:3
79
96:4
75
98:2
63
94:6
63
H3C
HO
O
H3CO
CH3
H3C
NHCH3
Halide displacement with NaN3 occurs with inversion of stereochemistry. Hydrolytic removal of
the auxiliary followed by hydrogenation of the azide delivers the amino acid.
O
H2O
O
N
H3C
CHO
HN
H3CO
2. H3O+
CHO
CH3
Bn
1. KOH
R
Br
95:5
OH
O
N
CH3
Cl
OH
H3CCHO
(H3C)3OBF4
OH
71
Mg(OCH3)2
HN
yield (%)
73
CH3
ratio*
CH3
Ph
aldehyde
H3C
O
R
Cl
imide
CH3
RCHO
1
97:3
OH
CH3
CHO
Bu2BOTf, Et3N,
Et2O;
Br
Bn
CH3
CHO
O
N
75
99:1
1
O
aldehyde
Bu2BOTf, Et3N,
Et2O;
Cl
Ph
H3CO
OH
HO
CH3
NH2
76%, 99% de
O
N
H3C
CH3
1. NaN3
2. LiOH/H2O
Evans, D. A.; Sjogren, E. B.; Weber, A. E.; Conn, R. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 39-42.
SCH3
Jaron Mercer
Myers
Vancomycin Aglycon:
O
NCS
Bn
Sn(OTf)2, N-ethylpiperidine;
OHC
95:5 dr
Cl
O
HN
Bn
NH2
OH
Br
Bn
1. Boc2O, DMAP;
HCO2H, H2O2
2. LiOOH
1. TMGA, CH2Cl2
2. LiOOH
Cl
OH
NO2
HO
N3
O HO CH3
NO2
N
Boc
X!+
NH2
2.
RS
X!+
RL
O
89%
94 : 6 dr
CH3
NH2 OTBDPS
98%
98 : 2 dr
OH
CH3
NH2
O
80%
85 : 15 dr
NH2
TIPS
O HO CH3
CH3
NH2 CH3
75%
83 : 17 dr
82%
94 : 6 dr
OH
O
Boc2O, NaHCO3
OH
HO
72%
83 : 17 dr
OH
X!+
X!+
RL
NH2
78 to 0 C
X!+
OH
O
X!+
HO2C
X!+
O2N
CH3
CH3
NH2 CH3
NO2
OHC
N
CH3
O HO RS
OH
Bu2BOTf, Et3N;
76%,
95:5 dr
OH
Br
Bn
NO2
O2N
O
N
Cl
F
Chem 115
N
H
H H
NH
Cl
O
H
N
HO2C
BnO
1:1 H2O:dioxane
79%
Cl
N
H
O
OH
O
H
N
O
N
H
CH2CH(CH3)2
NH2
OH
OH
NHCH3
vancomycin aglycon
Evans, D. A.; Wood, R. W.; Trotter, B. W.; Richardson, T. I.; Barrow, J. C.; Katz, J. L. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2700-2704.
Evans, D. A.; Watson, P. S. Tet. Lett. 1996, 37, 3251-3254.
OH
N
CH3
OH
NaOH
CH3
CH3 THF, CH3OH
23 C
NH2 CH3
95%
NaO
HO
BocHN
CH3
CH3
CH3
OH
CH3
CH3
NH2 CH3
O
SOCl2
CH3OH
91%
OH
CH3
H3CO
CH3
HCl NH2 CH3
Jaron Mercer
Myers
Chem 115
Paterson Aldol
Reviews:
OB()-Ipc2
H3C
R1
R2CHO
O
H3C
R1
()-Ipc2BOTf
i-Pr2NEt
OBIpc2
H3C
R1
CH2Cl2,78 C
OH O
R2CHO, 15 C;
H2O2
R2
R1
H3C
CH3
H3C
H3C
ketone
aldehyde
CH3
O
H3C
CH3
H3C
CH3
O
H3C
CH3
O
H3C
CH3
O
H3C
CH3
CH3
CH3
98:2
CHO
CH3
O
H3C
O
syn:anti
CHO
CHO
CH3
78
HR2
CH3 H
R1
B
O
O H3C
CH3
96:4
66
CH3
CH3
R1
H
H
CH3 H
B
O
O H3C
96:4
80
84
95:5
88
99
CH3
H
FAVORED
OH O
86
CH3
45
DISFAVORED
97:3
R2
CH3
CHO
CH3
H3C
79
CHO
R2
OH O
R1
CH3
R2
R1
CH3
Enolization occurs selectively on the less hindered side of the ketone and with (Z)-selectivity.
The (E)-Enolate, generated in low yield using ()-Ipc2BCl, does not lead to a selective
anti-aldol reaction.
Paterson, I.; Goodman, J. M.; Lister, M. A.; Scumann, R. C.; McClure, C. K.; Norcross, R. D.
Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 4663-4684.
Paterson, I.; Goodman, J. M.; Lister, M. A.; Scumann, R. C.; McClure, C. K.; Norcross, R. D.
Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 4663-4684.
M. Movassaghi
Myers
The origin of the diastereoselectivity is proposed to be due to a formyl hydrogen bond in the
favored transition state.
BzO
Chem 115
1. (c-Hex)2BCl
(CH3)2NEt
BzO
OB(c-Hex)2 1. RCHO, 14 h
78 ! 26
Et2O, 0 C
2h
CH3
2. H2O2, pH 7
CH3OH, 0 C
CH3 CH3
aldehyde
de (%)
yield (%)a
94
95
99
82
90
97
96
97
99
85
CH3
H3C
CHO
H3C
CHO
H3C
CHO
CH3
OH
BzO
OBL2
BzO
CH3 CH3
CH3 CH3
L = c-Hex
Ph
aIsolated
O
H3C
B
O
O
CHO
PhCHO
+ RCHO
vs.
H3C
R
CH3
Ph
B O
O
H
CH3 L
O
H
H
DISFAVORED
FAVORED
Diastereofacial selectivity is very high; "-chiral aldehydes afford anti-aldol adducts with high
diastereoselectivity regardless of their stereochemistry.
BzO
OB(c-Hex)2
+
MATCHED
OBn
CH3 CH3
OH
O
BzO
CH3
OBn
CH3 CH3 CH3
OB(c-Hex)2
+
MISMATCHED
OBn
CH3
CH3 CH3
OH
BzO
OBn
1. TBSOTf
2,6-Lutidine
CH2Cl2, 78 C
OH
BzO
CH3 CH3
R 2. LiBH4, THF
78 ! 20 C
R
CH3 CH3
OH OTBS
HO
BzO
CH3
CH3
(c-Hex)2BCl
(CH3)2NEt
CH3OH/H2O
CH3 CH3
i-PrCHO
O
OBn
BzO
CH3
(c-Hex)2BCl
(CH3)2NEt
i-PrCHO
i-Pr
CH3
95%, 86% de
BzO
CH3
R
CH3
0 C, 10 min
OTBS
H3C
R
CH3
R = i-Pr, 81%
R = Ph, 96%
i-Pr
CH3 OBn
CH3 CH3
OH
BzO
OTBS
OH
BzO
3. NaIO4
Other examples:
OH
BzO
CH3 CH3
80%, >94% de
BzO
OH
BzO
77%, 98% de
Paterson, I.; Wallace, D. J.; Cowden, C. J. Synthesis 1998, 639-652.
M. Movassaghi
Myers
Chem 115
Oleandolide:
H3C
O
(c-Hex)2BCl
Et3N, Et2O, 78 C;
(E)-CH3CH=CHCHO, 0 C
Acetate Aldol
Addition of a Chiral !-Sulphinylester Enolate to Aldehydes
OBn
(+)-(Ipc)2BOTf
i-Pr2NEt, CH2Cl2, 20 C;
CH2=CHCHO, 0 C
93%, 94% de
74%, 80% de
CH3
O
Ar
H3C
OBn
OBn
H2C
O
H3C
CH3 CH3
i-Pr2NMgBr
CH3
O
Ot-Bu
t-BuMgBr
THF, 78 C;
RCHO
Ar = 4-CH3C6H4
OH O
OH O
OH O
R
H3C
PMBO
OH O
Al, Hg
R
Ot-Bu
SOPh
CH3
CH3
CH3 O
O
Ar S
CH3CO2t-Bu
BnO
CH3 CH3 H
O
O
CH3
CH3
CH3
Ot-Bu
SOAr
The "-hydroxy ester products are isolated in 50-85% yield and 80-91% ee.
CH3
CH3 O
O
O
HO
CH3 CH3
H3C
O
HO
CH3
CH3
CH3
H3C
OH
H3C
O
H3C
O
O
CH3
Ar
O
Ot-Bu
S
H
Approach of the aldehyde is proposed to occur from the side of the non-bonding
electron pair of the sulfur atom with the R-group of the aldehyde anti to the sulfinyl
substituent. A chelated enolate is proposed.
OH
OH
CH3
O
O
H3C
Mg O
CH3
Paterson, I.; Norcross, R. D.; Ward, R. A.; Romea, P.; Lister, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
11287-11314.
M. Movassaghi
Myers
Chem 115
H CO2CH3
PhMgBr
Ph
77%
HO
HO
HO
Ph
Ph
H
Ph
Pyridine
H3C
82%
(R)-mandelic acid
NaOH
OH O
R
AcCl
HO
OH
OH O
R
HO
O
Ph
Ph RCHO
H 135 C
Ph
Ph
Ph
H
Ph
LDA; MgX2
THF, (CH3)2O
MO
MO
H2C
76-85% (2 steps)
84-96% ee
Ph
Ph
H
Ph
M = Li, MgX
H3C
CH3
O
H3C
1. n-Bu2BOTf, i-Pr2NEt
CH2Cl2, 0 C
SCH3
N
O
OH
R
SCH3
2. PhCHO
78 ! 23 C
CH3
O
3. Ra-Ni, 60 C
acetone
4. 2N KOH
CH3OH, 0 C
86-99% de
OH
R
HO
R = Ph, CH3,
n-C3H7, i-C3H7
80-90% (4 steps)
86-99% ee
Evans, D. A.; Bartroli, J.; Shih, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2127-2129.
H3C
CH3
O
HO
O
CHO
H3C
H3C
CH3
HO
O
CHO
H3C
Ph
Ph
Ph
H
Ph
Ph
H
Ph
H3C
MATCHED
CH3
O
OH
>94% de
OH O
H3C
MISMATCHED
CH3
40% de
OH
OH O
R1
OSi(CH3)3
H
3 (20 mol%), 14 h
C2H5CN, 78 C;
R2
1N HCl/THF
OH O
R1
yield (%)
ee (%)
C6H5
82
89
c-C6H11
C6H5
67
93
2-furyl
C6H5
100
92
n-C4H9
56
86
R1
R2
Ph
c-C6H11
R2
Myers
Chem 115
Use of terminal trimethylsilyl enol ethers provide the highest level of enantioselectivities.
CH3
CH3
Nu
O B
O N
H
R
HN
t-Bu
S
N
O
O Ti
O
O
A transition state is proposed in which the si face of the aldehyde is blocked by the indole ring.
Br
O
t-Bu
()-1
t-Bu
O
R1
O
R
OSi(CH3)3
H
St-Bu
1. (S)-BINOL, Ti(Oi-Pr)4
(20 mol%), 4-MS
Et2O, 20 C
2. Silyl thioketene acetal
3. 10% HCl, CH3OH
OSi(CH3)3
+
yield (%)
ee (%)
PhCHO
90
97
PhCH2CH2CHO
80
97
furylCHO
88
>98
c-C6H11CHO
70
89
PhCH2OCH2CHO
82
>98
2. Bu4NF, THF
OH O
R1
OR2
OH O
R
St-Bu
Aldehyde
CH3
aldehyde
OR2
CH3
Ph
Ph
%ee: R2 = Et
%ee: R2 = CH3
%ee: R2 = Bn
CHO
92
97
CHO
88
95
CHO
93
97
96
CHO
89
94
91
94
95
93
96
96
CHO
CHO
Yields for two steps (addition and desilylation) range from 72-98%.
Myers
Chem 115
t-Bu
N
Complete removal of i-PrOH during catalyst preparation is key to achieving high yields
and selectivities. This may be done by azeotropic removal of i-PrOH with toluene or by
its silylation in an in situ catalyst preparation (TMSCl, Et3N).
Br
O
O Ti
Oi-Pr
Oi-Pr
()-2
The reaction can be carried out in a variety of solvents, such as toluene, benzene,
chloroform, diethyl ether, and tert-butyl methyl ether.
Alkenyl and alkynyl aldehydes are particularly good substrates for this catalytic
process.
O
R
O
R
1. ()-1 (3 mol %)
Et2O, 0 C
OSi(CH3)3
H
OCH3
TBSOCH2
Ph
TIPS
TBSO
H3C
H3C
CHO
CHO
CHO
CHO
CH3
OH O
R
2. Et2O, 2N HCl
CH3
OH O
2. n-Bu4NF
aldehyde
OCH3
OCH3
aldehdye
temp. (C)
yield
%ee
Ph(CH2)3
CHO
99
98
TBSOCH2
CHO
85
93
99
91
0 ! 23
98
90
PhCHO
0 ! 23
83
66
c-C6H11CHO
0 ! 23
79
75
yield (%)
%ee
Ph
88
96
Ph
96
94
88
97
88
96
CHO
CHO
Carreira, E. M.; Singer, R. A.; Lee, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8837-8838.
Singer, R. A.; Carreira, E. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 927-930.
Singer, R. A.; Shepard, M. S.; Carreira, E. M. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 7025-7032.
Carreira, E. M; Lee, W.; Singer, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3649-3650.
M. Movassaghi
Myers
Chem 115
The vinyl ether products can be isolated, or transformed into other useful products:
O3, CH2Cl2;
Ph3P
The silyl dienolate is easily prepared, purified by distillation, and is stable to storage.
The absolute sense of induction parallels that of acetate-derived silyl enol ether and
2-methoxypropene addition reactions.
The protected acetoacetate adducts are versatile precursors for the preparation of optically
active !-hydroxy-"-keto esters, amides, and lactones.
OH O
Ph
OCH3
OH OCH3
Ph
CH2
84% isolated yield
OsO4, NMO
acetone, H2O
OH O
OH
Ph
OH O
O
X = NHBn, 73%
X X = On-Bu, 81%
Ph
or
n-BuOH
Ph
Carreira, E. M; Lee, W.; Singer, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3649-3650.
OH O
LiAl(NHBn)4
H3C CH3
O
K2CO3, Zn(NO3)2
O
Ph
CH3OH
79%
t-Bu
Singer, R. A.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12360-12361.
N
O
O Ti
O
O
Br
H3C CH3
t-Bu
O
R
H +
t-Bu
H3C CH3
OSi(CH3)3
()-1
OSi(CH3)3
yield (%)
%ee
86
91
THF, 78 C;
acidic work-up
OH O
R
O
O
H3C CH3
OH O
R
aldehyde
yield (%)
%ee
PhCHO
92
94
98
95
82
90
CHO
48
91
CHO
81
83
74
65
aldehyde
H3C CH3
(S)-Tol-BINAPCuF2
(2 mol %)
CHO
CHO
TIPS
CHO
TBSO
CHO
CHO
CH3
CHO
n-Bu3Sn
Ph
CHO
PhCHO
aafter
recrystallization.
OCH3
97
94
88
92
79
92
Ph
97
80
Ph
Ph
83
84
CH3
(96)a
CHO
CH3
M. Movassaghi
Myers
Chem 115
Catalytic, Enantioselective Aldol Additions of Silyl Thioketene Acetals and Silyl Enol Ethers
N
Cu
H3C CH3
2+
O 2 SbF6
2 TfO
N
Cu
C(CH3)3
Ph
Ph
2+
C(CH3)3
SR2
R1
H3C
Ph
Ph
H3C
SPh
CH2Cl2
Et3N
78 # 23 C
BX2
OH O
RCHO
SPh
SR2
2. 1 N HCl, THF
R1
R2
enol silane
geometry
time (h)
T (C)
syn:anti
%ee
yield (%)
t-Bu
24
78
99
99
CH3
Et
(Z)
78
97:3
97
90
CH3
Et
(E)
1d
50
86:14
85
48
i-Bu
Et
(Z)
2d
50
95:5
95
85
R1
OH O
BnO
CH3
S N B N S
O O
O
Br O
1. 1 (10 mol%)
CH2Cl2, 78 C
OTMS
90 C, 2h
aldehdye
yield (%)
C6H5CHO
84
91
i-PrCHO
82
83
SPh
ee (%)
N
O
N
H
Cu
Ph
O
Bn
2+
H
N
O
Ph
H
Nu (si face)
Upon completion of the reaction, the (R,R)-bis-sulfonamide can be recovered and reused.
Corey, E. J.; Imwinkelried, R.; Pikul, S.; Xiang, Y. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5493-5495.
Evans, D. A.; Kozlowski, M. C.; Murry, J. A.; Burgey, C.; Campos, K. R.; Connell, B. T.; Staples, R.
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 669-685.
M. Movassaghi
Myers
TMSO
O
BnO
Chem 115
H +
Ot-Bu
1. 1 (2 mol%)
CH2Cl2, 78 C
OH O
BnO
Ot-Bu
2. PPTS, CH3OH
85%, 99% ee
Evans, D. A.; Kozlowski, M. C.; Murry, J. A.; Burgey, C.; Campos, K. R.; Connell, B. T.; Staples, R.
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 669-685.
O
H3CO
OTMS
CH3
St-Bu
R
2 (10 mol%)
THF
78 C
1 N HCl
H3C OH O
H3CO
O
OH
R
aldehyde
yield
%ee
p-NO2C6H4CHO
68 (60)
76 (86)
C6H5CHO
62 (60)
60 (89)
p-BrC6H4CHO
74 (85)
65 (67)
o-CCl6H4CHO
94 (71)
69 (74)
!-napthaldehyde
54 (60)
77 (88)
i-PrCHO
97 (65)
96 (96)
c-C6H11CHO
63 (45)
84 (83)
t-BuCHO
81
>99
85
>99
St-Bu
CHO
H3C CH3 O
S
NH
OH
DMTC
H3C CH3
O
H3CO
OTMS
CH3
1 (10 mol%)
CH2Cl2
St-Bu
R
78 C
Tertiary and !-branched aldehydes result in the highest yields and enantioselectivities, while
unbranched aliphatic aldehydes give poor yields and enantioselectivities.
5,5-Dimethyl thiazolidinium-4-carboxylate (DMTC) has also been found to be an efficient
amino acid catalyst for the acetone aldol reaction. Results with DMTC are in parentheses.
List, B.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2395-2396.
H3C OH O
H3CO
O
St-Bu
Kandasamy, S.; Notz, W.; Bui, T.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5260-5267.
Proposed transition state:
Evans, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C.; Campos, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1085910860.
Johnson, J. S.; Evans, D. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 325-335.
OH
+
H3C
CH3
NH
R
O
H
H O
H3C
H
O
OH
H3C
Rankin, K. N.; Gauld, J. W.; Boyd, R. J. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002, 106, 5155-5159.
Bahmanyar, S.; Houk, K. N.; Martin, H. J.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2475-2479.
For a discussion on the involvement of oxazolidinones in the mechanism, see: Seebach, D.; Beck,
A. K.; Badine, M.; Limbach, M.; Eschenmoser, A.; Treasurywala, A. M.; Hobi, R.; Prikoszovich, W.;
Linder, B. Helv. Chim. Acta 2007, 90, 425471.
M. Movassaghi, Chris Coletta
Myers
Chem 115
yield (%)
anti:syn
%ee
c-C6H11CHO
60
>20:1
>99
i-PrCHO
62
>20:1
>99
o-ClC6H4CHO
95
1.5:1
67
t-BuCH2CHO
38
1.7:1
>97
H3C CH3
aldehyde
catalyst
yield
anti/syn
%ee
i-PrCHO
(S)-proline
97
>98:2
94
(S)-proline
86
>98:2
90
BnOCH2CHO
(S)-proline
40
>98:2
97
(CH3O)2CHCHO
(S)-proline
69
94:6
93
(R)-proline
76
>98:2
>98
(S)-proline
80
>98:2
>96
(R)-proline
31
(S)-proline
80
CHO
O
40
2:1
H3C
>97
O
CH3
CH3
CHO
O
Ph
CHO
51
>20:1
>95
H3C
CH3
NBoc
H3C
>96
CH3
CHO
O
The anti-diol product formed is not readily accessible via asymmetric dihydroxylation, making
this reaction complementary to the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation.
H3C CH3
c-C6H11CHO
CHO
O
H3C
NCbz
>98:2
>96
CH3
The reaction is highly regioselective, and with suitable substrates (!-branched aliphatic
aldehydes) the anti:syn ratio (dr) and enantioselectivity are excellent. In the case of !unbranched aldehydes and aromatic aldehydes, the poor anti:syn selectivity is thought to result
from a decrease in an eclipsing interaction between the alcohol and the aldehyde in the
disfavored boat transition state shown below.
The use of linear aldehydes in this reaction leads to poor yields, likely due to self
condensation.
Aromatic aldehydes form products with low diastereoselectivity (e.g., a 4:1 anti:syn ratio was
reported for ortho-chlorobenzaldehyde).
H3C
OH
R HO
OH
NH
N
H O
H3C
OH
R
H3C
OH
With the !-chiral !-aminoaldehyde shown above, the mismatched case results in a poor
yield,
but excellent dr and ee.
Certain hexoses have been synthesized by this method.
FAVORED
O
H
H
HO
R
eclipsing
interaction
O
N
O H O
H3C
DISFAVORED
H
O
OH
R
H3C
OH
OH
H3C CH3
O
H3C
Dowex, H2O
O
CH3
HO
O
CH2OH
OH OH
HO
OH
D-psicose
OH
OH OH
CH2OH
Enders, D.; Grondal, C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1210-1212.
Chris Coletta
Myers
Chem 115
10 mol% L-proline
R2
R1
OH
DMF, 4 C
The aldol products from !-oxyaldehydes can be further elaborated as part of a two-step
synthesis of carbohydrates.
O
R2
R1
R1
R2
yield (%)
anti:syn
%ee
Me
Et
80
4:1
99
Me
i-Bu
88
3:1
97
Me
c-C6H11
87
14:1
99
Me
Ph
81
3:1
99
Me
i-Pr
82
24:1
>99
98
91
n-Bu
i-Pr
80
24:1
Bn
i-Pr
76
19:1
Slow addition via syringe pump of the donor aldehyde to a solution of the acceptor aldehyde
and proline is required in order to avoid dimerization of the donor aldehyde.
Either non-enolizable aldehydes or aldehydes containg !- or "-branching are suitable
acceptor aldehydes for this reaction.
Northrup, A. B.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6798-6799.
H
TIPSO
MgBr2Et2O
Et2O
20 4 C
OR
10 mol% L-proline
TIPSO
98
DMF
73
PMB
DMF
64
4:1
97
MOM
DMF
42
4:1
96
TBDPS
DMF/dioxane
61
9:1
96
TIPS
DMSO
92
4:1
95
62
4:1
88
Northrup, A. B.; Mangion, I. K.; Hettche, F.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
6798-6799.
OAc
OH
TIPSO
OAc
OH
OH
Mannose
Allose
87% yield
>19:1 dr, 95% ee
97% yield
>19:1 dr, 95% ee
H
OBn
TBDPSO
O
D-proline
OH
OBn
98% ee
78%
H
O
OBn
H3C
MgBr2Et2O
65%, 10:1 dr
98% ee
OR
OBn
OBn
BnO
H
L-proline,
DMSO
91%
intramolecular
Michael reaction
O
O
O
O
HO
%ee
TIPSO
Glucose
OR
Bn
dioxane
TIPSO
OH
anti:syn
OH
79% yield
10:1 dr, 95% ee
OR
yield (%)
TIPSO
OAc
TMSO
4:1
TBS
OH
TiCL4
CH2Cl2
20 4 C
OH
OH
OAc
TMSO
OTIPS
MgBr2Et2O
CH2Cl2
20 4 C
O
TIPSO
OH
H
TIPSO
DMSO
92%, 4:1 (anti:syn)
95% ee
10 mol% L-proline
HO
H3C
O
H3C
OAc
OH
BnO
OH
h# = 350 nm;
H2, Pd/C
O
O
H
O OBn
H3C
O O
O
OBn
OBn
O
O
84%
O OH
H3C
O O
O
OH
OH
littoralisone
Myers
Chem 115
The thioester group of the aldol products can be transformed by Pd-catalyzed cross coupling
to give ketones.
OH
O
N
H3C
Ph
Ph
PhS
O
OH
PhS
CH3
aldehyde
9:1 PhCH3:acetone
23 C, 0.17 M, 24 h
OH
CH3
syn:anti
CH3(CH2)6CHO
80
9:1
CH3O2C(CH3)4CHO
83
10:1
OH
CH3
CH3
Pd(dppf)Cl2, trifurylphosphine
Cu(I), i-Pr2NEt
DMF, 50 C, 6 h
76%
PhS
yield (%)
HO
CH3
1
O
OH
OH
%ee
92 (R)
OH
O
H3C
94
CH3
OH
CH3
CH3
CHO
83
9:1
93 (S)
79
8:1
91
O2N
OH
CHO
H3C
CH3(CH2)5
Magdziak, D.; Lalic, G.; Lee, H. M.; Fortner, K. C.; Aloise, A. D.; Shair, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 7284-3695.
59
2.2:1
96 (S)
OH
73
c-C6H11CHO
89
36:1
93
[Bn2NH2][OCOCF3]
O
70
5.5:1
92
O
H
H O
amberlyst 15
MeOH, MgSO4
O
H
(109.5 g)
H
O(CH2)4CHO
H
48 (71a)
(S)-proline;
OH
O
H3C
7.5:1
CHO
H3C
HO
OCH3
H3C
(15.0 g)
H
O
4 steps
O
CH3
atwo
HO
equiv of aldehyde was used.
This method is compatible with aldehyde substrates containing unprotected hydroxyl groups,
including phenols.
Aromatic aldehydes and !-branched aldehydes are generally poor substrates.
CO2H
CH3
(1.9 g)
Coulthard, G; Erb, W.; Aggarwal, V. K. Nature 2012, 489, 278-281.
HO
HO
Chris Coletta, Fan Liu