Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
What is History?
Herodotus of Halicarnassus
Who was he?
-
Father of History
Greek
Context:
-
Motive:
-
Strengths
Used Primary Sources
Seeks truth
Aimed to get rid of bias
Let audience decide for themselves.
Weaknesses.
Used myths
Added his own interpretations
Aimed for both popular and truthful
history, which is hard to get both
together.
Thucydides
Who was he?
-
An Athenian, 460-395BC
Wrote about Peloponnesian wars (Peloponnesia vs Athens)
Military commander and discussed those issues in his History.
Context:
-
Athenian
460-395 BC
Sought facts and truth and used them to reveal lessons about human
nature to help those in power to understand their people.
Entered into characters minds and tried to guess what their actions
would have been.
Wrote speeches he hadnt heard or couldnt remember much of.
With references to speeches in this historymy habit has been to
make the speakers say what was in my opinion demanded of them
(Thucydides).
Honest about his bias though.
Tried to fit events to patterns and made characters fit into those
patterns.
Relied on what he saw and the accounts of eyewitnesses. (Primary
sources) and aimed to get rid of bias and error in his accounts.
Tested his work to see if it was truthful.
Used reason, not fate or the role of the gods to explain events.
Interpretted and explained told the audience what to think
Wrote political/military history.
Motive
-
Strengths
Logical and used reason, not fate.
Primary sources.
Tested sources for reliability
Looked for personal errors and bias
in his own work.
Honest about his bias.
Weaknesses.
Made up speeches or the actions of
characters even though he didnt
know.
Tried to fit history and characters
into a pattern
Aimed to teach, interpreted it
himself. Possibly twisting it to get
the lessons he wanted
Political history wants to please
those above him?
Bernard Bailyn
Who was he?
-
Professor.
1922 present.
Context:
-
Modern historian
American.
Studied American colonial and revolution era history.
Strengths
Analyses sources critically
Weaknesses.
Explanation of gaps in history may be
inaccurate and biased.
John Vincent
Source: An intelligent persons guide to history book on historiography.
Who was he?
-
British
Modern historian.
Born 1937
Context:
Post Modern
Motive
-
Strengths
Recognises Bias
Weaknesses.
Bede
Who was he?
-
Context:
-
672-735 BC
Had a library at the Monestary with the writings of Eusebius and
Orosius and Gildas.
Christianity was key to society. Church and state were joined.
Motive
-
Strengths
Used primary sources
Referenced sources
Used many sources and
trusted/reliable ones.
Weaknesses.
Biased
Used History to prove a point and
recorded what proved his point.
Political bias. Done for the pope.
Dramaticised some elements.
Context:
-
Motive
-
Strengths
More humanistic approach
potentially less biased.
Medieval Historians
Weaknesses.
Copied Classical historians, tried to
parallel Rome with Florance write
what fits, possibly leaving out
information.
Thought Medieval history was
worthless
Drew lessons from History possible
meant twisting the truth to find
lessons.
Context:
-
Motive
-
Strengths
Weaknesses.
Biased
Trying to fit History to patterns.
Romantic Era
Who was they?
-
Context:
- After Medieval era.
How did he write/record History?
-
Motive
-
Strengths
Sought truth
Didnt try to shape it for moral
lessons.
Weaknesses.
Bias against medieval history
German
1795-1886
Context?
-
Motive
-
Strengths
Criticised texts
Sought truth
Primary sources and tested for
reliability
Weaknesses.
Still biased, though he aimed not to
be
His books still only had evidence that
suited his purpose
Did not research too widely, left out
information he viewed as
unimportant.
Many texts
Aimed for objectivity
Didnt try to judge the past by the
present
Others view of him
-
Scientific History
Context:
-
Who:
-
Motive
-
Strengths
Sought truth
Not personal more objective
Tested sources for reliability
Weaknesses.
Did not acknowledge that we are
subjective, therefore what we write
will be
Not personal Not really accurate
history, since it was about personal
beings.
Not all facts recorded,
interpretations still proved wrong at
times.
George Trevelyan
Who was he/context?
-
British
1876-1952
History is an art
Motive:
-
Strengths
Sought truth
Sought to fill the gaps
Critically analysed sources
Researched widely
Weaknesses.
Interpretation may be at the cost of
reliability
Nationalistic bias
Cold war
Motive:
-
Strengths
Very Thorough
Weaknesses.
Selected what evidence to use
Had a motive
Subjective
Nazi History
How did they write/record History/Motive?
-
Strengths
Weaknesses.
Biased, untruthful.
Marxist History
How did He write/record History/Motive?
-
Strengths
Weaknesses.
Fitting a pattern to it
Laslett, Carr.
Focussed on groups of people, not personal
Gathered as much information as possible
No interpretations, just fact.
Seeking objectivity
Written for specialists, academic history
Bias/subjectivity not acknowledged.
Completely opposed to Traditional History
Criticise sources
Traditional History
-
Elton, Trevelyan
Focussed on groups and individuals
Facts and interpretation used
Acknowledged that subjectivity and bias are inevitable
For the wider public
Imagination used, but limited and facts sought
Truth sought for and aimed to be objective/self-criticise
Seek reliable sources/criticise sources
Gathered as much information as possible.
In Essence, they were both the same, just that scientific history claimed to
not have errors, while traditional history acknowledged its errors and sought
to get rid of them.
Evans
Context:
-
British
Cambridge head of Modern History
1947-present
The past really happened, the historians job is to find out what
happened
Self-criticism
Test sources for reliability and usefulness
Primary sources
Looking for the reasons behind history. Why did it happen.
Strengths
Seeking truth
Weaknesses.
Being human, he is biased and
subjective like everyone else.
Primary sources
Tested sources + looked for personal
bias
Aimed for objectivity
Enlightenment Historians
Who were they?
-
Context:
-
Motive:
-
Strengths
Less religiously motivated
Available to all
Aimed to improve society
Weaknesses.
Assumed Human nature was the
same patterns
Popular, less detailed
Aimed to improve society
Used experience biased and based
on their own worldview.
Gibbon
Who was he?
-
Context:
-
1737-94
Motive:
-
Strengths
Weaknesses.
Accurate History
Did not believe History repeated
itself or had a simple pattern
Made his opinions clear
Marxist Historians
Who were they?
-
Context:
-
Industrialisation, 1800s
Motive:
- To show that money is at the centre and that the lower class will
overthrow all others and end class conflict
Strengths
Weaknesses.
Context:
Motive:
Strengths
Weaknesses.