Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 29 November 2014
Received in revised form 11 April 2015
Accepted 14 April 2015
Keywords:
Biosorption
Photo-catalytic degradation
Basic Blue 41
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Acid TiO2 hydrosol
a b s t r a c t
Factorial experiments with ve factors; stirring rate, process time and temperature, initial dye concentration and biosorbent dosage at three levels were conducted based on central composite design of
experiments to investigate their effect on Basic Blue 41 dye biosorption onto bioethanol fermentation
spent waste biomass of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A highly statistically signicant quadratic model at 95%
2
condence level (p < 0.0001,R2 0.9612andRadj
0.9386) was developed to charcterize the inuence of these
variables on biosorption effeciency. Response surface methodology was employed to optimize the process, recording maximum biosorption % of 94% (23.5 mg/g) under static condition, within 14 h at 20 C
using 0.6% biosorbent in an initial dye solution of 150 mg/L. Approximately 92% of adsorbed dye was desorbed by elution with self-clean acid TiO2 hydrosol (pH 2) and the regenerated biosorbent was employed
for four successive cycles. The photo-catalytic degradation of the desorbed dye under ultraviolet illumination (8 W) followed the pseudo rst order kinetic model (R2 0.9687) with apparent rate constant Kapp
of 0.0043 min1 . The proposed integrating biosorption with self-clean desorption and photo-catalytic
degradation process, resulted in no secondary pollution in the form of any concentrated wastes, thus has
important environmental and economic aspects.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Discharge of industrial efuents contaminated with dyestuffs
in the waterways is a matter of concern for both toxicological
and esthetical reasons [1]. Azodyes are the mostly used colorants
(6070%), the chemical groups constructing these dyes; azo group
( N N ), aromatic rings and auxo-chromes ( OH, SO3 , etc.) make
their bioremediation from efuents a sophisticated matter [2].
The conventional methods for treating dye-containing wastewater; occulation, coagulation, precipitation, membrane ltration,
ozonation, elctrochmical techniques and biodegradation are usually ineffective for complete removal of these compounds [3]. The
most widely used and effective method is adsorption using activated carbon, zeolite, grapheme oxide and nano-porpus silica, etc.,
but its running costs are expensive [4,5]. Implementation cost of
an efuent treatment plant is of prime consideration inuencing
decision-making; this led many researchers to search for alterna-
194
+1
0
4
15
100
0.2
50
12
25
150
0.4
100
20
35
200
0.6
photo-catalytic activity was prepared and rstly used as an eluent to desorb BB-41 from the sorbent, and then its photo-catalytic
degradation capabilities on the desorbed dye was studied, in an
attempt that, the hydrosol could be continuously used in desorption
and photo-degradation process, which consequently would economize large volume of the eluent and would not bring secondary
pollution.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Biosorbent
Fermentation spent waste biomass of S. cerevisiae, purchased
from Petroleum Biotechnology lab, Egyptian Petroleum Research
Institute was used in this study.
The biomass was washed three times with distilled water, dried
overnight at 60 C, then grinded in a mortar, sieved to constant size
(0.070.08 mm) and stored for further use.
2.2. Adsorbate
The dye used in this study was, C.I. Basic Blue 41 (Synonyms: Panacryl; Blue X-GRL; Maxilon Blue GRL 300%; Sevron
Blue GR; Kayacryl Blue GRL; Anilan Blue GRL; Synacril Blue
G; Abcol Blue GRL 900%; Aizen Cathilon Blue GRHL; Basacryl
Blue Z-3GL or Astrazon Blue FGGL) is a cationic azo textile dye, and was purchased from Ciba Specialty Chemicals Inc. [color index C.I. number: 11,105, C.B. number:
CB0499107, molecular formula: C20 H26 N4 O6 S2 , molecular weight:
482.57, IUPAC name: 2-[N-ethyl-4-[(6-methoxy-3-methyl-1,3benzothiazol-3-ium-2-yl)diazenyl]anilino]ethanol;methyl sulfate.
It is also named as benzothiazolium, 2-((4-(ethyl(2-hydroxyethyl)
amino)phenyl)azo)-6-methoxy-3-methyl-, methyl sulfate (salt).
The structure of Basic Blue-41 (BB-41) is illustrated in Fig. 1.
A stock solution of BB-41 with a concentration of 200 mg/L was
prepared in distilled water, which was further diluted according to
the experimental conditions.
2.3. Analysis of dye
The max 608 nm of BB-41 was determined on a doublebeam JASCO UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometer model V-570 (JASCO
Analytical instruments, 8649 Commerce Drive, Easton, Maryland
21,601-9903, USA). Standard curve for different concentrations of
the dye solution (2.5100 mg/L) was established as the concentration range of BB-41 adhering to Beers law within 0100 mg/L and
distilled water was used as the blank.
2.4. Batch biosorption experiments
Each batch adsorption experiment was conducted by contacting
100 mL (pH 7) of different initial concentrations of BB-41 (adsorbate) with known dose of dried biomass as an adsorbent in 250 mL
Erlenmeyer asks closed with PARAFILM M to prevent evaporative loss and placed in a rotary shaking incubator set at different
C C
o
t
Co
100
(1)
(2)
195
Table 2
The central composite design matrix for ve coded independent variables along with experimental and predicted BB-41 dye removal percentage.
Run
number
A
Stirring rate (rpm)
B
Time
(h)
C Temperature
( C)
D
Initial dye
concentration (mg/L)
E Biosorbent
dosage % (w/v)
Dye removal %
Experimental
Predicted
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
1
1
1
0
+1
0
0
1
1
1
1
+1
+1
1
0
+1
+1
+1
+1
0
+1
1
0
+1
0
+1
+1
0
+1
+1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
+1
1
0
1
0
1
1
+1
0
1
+1
+1
0
1
1
0
0
+1
+1
0
1
1
1
+1
+1
+1
1
0
+1
1
0
1
0
+1
+1
0
1
0
1
1
0
+1
1
+1
1
0
0
+1
0
1
+1
1
0
+1
0
+1
+1
1
0
+1
+1
1
0
+1
+1
0
0
0
0
0
1
+1
1
1
1
+1
+1
0
1
+1
0
1
0
+1
1
+1
1
0
+1
+1
0
+1
+1
+1
1
0
0
+1
0
0
1
1
0
+1
0
1
1
1
0
+1
+1
1
1
1
+1
0
0
+1
0
0
1
+1
+1
1
1
+1
1
0
+1
1
0
+1
0
-1
-1
0
-1
-1
+1
-1
0
-1
+1
+1
-1
0
+1
+1
0
0
1
+1
0
-1
0
+1
+1
-1
0
-1
+1
+1
0
+1
1
0
0
+1
0
0
+1
+1
1
1
+1
1
1
+1
1
+1
0
+1
1
1
+1
0
+1
0
+1
1
0
+1
1
+1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
+1
0
+1
0
+1
1
1
0
1
+1
1
0
58.49
46.25
92.00
88.33
93.11
84.50
88.00
74.37
72.67
71.49
83.84
72.87
82.48
59.22
86.10
87.50
61.41
95.69
91.56
84.62
88.86
77.78
78.44
65.35
79.45
77.85
61.29
88.23
90.14
68.0
86.33
73.57
88.13
87.48
69.56
88.48
71.39
77.66
85.81
88.33
91.71
88.33
83.19
76.14
74.70
88.36
88.12
95.32
84.16
83.85
62.16
49.84
90.25
87.13
90.19
85.50
87.13
71.88
68.20
75.06
80.92
73.13
85.65
57.40
89.02
84.86
62.01
96.24
92.61
83.98
91.09
78.68
80.05
66.06
82.23
79.68
63.29
87.13
89.43
67.35
85.85
73.74
87.13
86.98
67.87
87.13
72.95
81.41
86.81
87.13
89.30
87.13
84.11
72.75
73.96
87.13
84.93
97.60
86.90
84.52
196
(3)
Table 3. It can be indicated that the model is highly statistically signicant at 95% condence level, with F-value of 36.3 and very low
probability p-value of <0.0001, i.e., there is less than 0.01% chance
that this error is caused by noise. The values of the determination
2 which measure the model tting reliabilcoefcients, R2 andRadj
ity for model (Eq. (3), were calculated to be 0.9612 and 0.9386,
respectively. This suggests that, approximately 96.12% of the variance is attributed to the variables and indicated a high signicance
of the model. Thus, only 3.88% of the total variations cannot be
explained by the model which ensures the good adjustment of the
above model to experimental data. Conrmation of the adequacy
of the regression model was reected also by the good agreement
between experimental and predicted values of response variables
as shown in Table 2. Where, the actual experimental biosorption
percentage ranged from 46.25 to 95.69% and its corresponding predicted values are 49.84 and 96.24%, respectively. Adeq Precision
measures the signal to noise ratio. A ratio greater than 4 is desirable
[13]. The ratio of 28.42 indicated an adequate signal. This model is
reliable and can be used to navigate the design space. The standard
deviation SD and coefcient of variance were low recording 2.8 and
3.46, respectively.
The relationship between the predicted and experimental values of biosorption efciency (% dye removal) is shown in Fig. 2a. It
can be seen that there is a high correlation (R2 = 0.9701) between
the predicted and experimental values indicating that the predicted and experimental values were in reasonable agreement. It
means that the data t well with the model and give a convincingly good estimate of response for the system in the experimental
range studied.
Fig. 2b shows the normal probability plots of the standardized residuals for biosorption efciency. The standardized residuals
measure the number of standard deviations separating the actual
and predicted values. A normal probability plot indicates if the
residuals follow a normal distribution, in which case the points will
follow a straight line. Since some scattering is expected even with
the normal data, as shown in Fig. 2b, it can be assumed that the
data is normally distributed. Thus, indicates a good validity for the
approximation of the quadratic regression model.
Fig. 2c shows standardized residual versus predicted values for
% dye removal. In this research, points of observed runs were scattered randomly within the constant range of residuals across the
graph. Thus, it revealed no obvious pattern and unusual structure.
i.e., the model is adequate and there is no reason to suspect any
violation of the independence or constant variance assumption in
all runs. The standardized residuals versus run plot represented in
Fig. 2d, shows randomly scattered points ranged between 3; the
errors were normally distributed and insignicant.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the regression model was
carried out to nd the statistical signicance of the main and interacting effects of different studied parameters on the biosorption
process at 95% condence level. The signicance of each coefcient was determined by F-values and p-values (Table 3). The larger
the magnitude of the F-value and the smaller the p-values, the
more signicant is the corresponding coefcient. This implies that
the main effect of stirring rate, process time, initial dye concentration and biosorbent dosage have a highly positive statistically
signicant effect on dye removal (p < 0.0001), i.e., high dye removal
efciency occurs at high levels of those factors. But process temperature has a highly negative statistically signicant effect on
dye removal (p < 0.0001), i.e., a reduction in dye removal efciency
occurs at high temperatures. It is difcult to explain clearly the
adsorption process with respect to a single factor, hence, overall
interactive effects of various studied parameters were considered
in the model to determine the dye removal response and optimization of multiple interacting factors was done to improve the
197
198
Table 3
Analysis of variance of the tted quadratic regression model Eq. (3).
Source
SSa
dfa
MSa
F-value
p-value
Remarks
Model
A
B
C
D
E
A2
B2
C2
D2
E2
AB
AC
AD
AE
BC
BD
BE
CD
CE
DE
Residual
Pure error
Corrected total
6.00E + 003
164
1.75E + 003
206
202
257
104
56.5
95.7
37.6
9.94
0.0810
47.7
291
55.1
893
198
2.72
202
85.7
437
239
0.16
6240.74
20
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
29
7
49
300
164
1.75E + 003
206
202
257
104
56.5
95.7
37.6
9.94
0.0810
47.7
291
55.1
893
198
2.72
202
85.7
437
8.26
0.022
36.3
19.8
212
24.9
24.5
31.1
12.6
6.84
11.6
4.55
1.20
0.00981
5.78
35.3
6.67
108
23.9
0.329
24.5
10.4
52.9
<0.0001
0.000116
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
<0.0001
0.00135
0.0140
0.00196
0.0414
0.282
0.922
0.0229
<0.0001
0.0151
<0.0001
<0.0001
0.570
<0.0001
0.00314
<0.0001
Highly signicant
Highly signicant
Highly signicant
Highly signicant
Highly signicant
Highly signicant
Signicant
Possibly signicant
Signicant
Possibly signicant
Non signicant
Non signicant
Possibly signicant
Highly signicant
Possibly signicant
Highly signicant
Highly signicant
Non signicant
Highly signicant
Signicant
Highly signicant
centration and biomass dosage of 100 rpm, 150 mg/L and 0.4%,
respectively. It is obvious from Fig. 4b that biosorption percentage
increased with increase in process time and temperature reaching its maximum 97% within 2530 C and 20 h, but it decreased
with further increase in temperature. The rate of biosorption was
nearly sustained within 1420 h, indicating equilibrium. Fig. 4c
represents the RSM plot and contour lines of the highly statistically signicant negative interactive effect of process time and
initial dye concentration on biosorption process at constant stirring rate 100 rpm, process temperature 25 C and biomass dosage
0.4%, respectively. At short process time, the biosorption was low;
however, it increased with time reaching equilibrium within 12 h
and remained nearly sustained between 1420 h. The maximum
biosorption percent 97% was achieved at initial dye concentration
of 150 mg/L within 12 h and remained nearly sustained thereafter,
but further increment of initial dye concentration decreased the
biosorption percentage, even at long process time. The RSM plot
and contour lines, Fig. 4d, conrm the highly statistically negative
interactive effect of process temperature and initial dye concentration on biosorption % at constant stirring rate 100 rpm, process
time 12 h and biomass dosage 0.4%. At low temperature 15 C and
initial dye concentration 100 mg/L the biosorption was relatively
low recording 78%. But it increased with increase in temperature
reaching its maximum between 25 and 30 C and decreased with
further temperature increment. Generally, at high initial dye concentration >150 mg/L the biosorption decreased. Fig. 4e illustrates
the positive interactive effect of process temperature with biomass
dosage at constant stirring rate 100 rpm, process time 12 h and
initial dye concentration 150 mg/L. It is obvious that dye removal
was low at low biosorbent concentration and temperature, but,
increased with the increase of temperature and biomass dosage,
recording 97% dye removal at 25 C and 0.4%, respectively. However, the increase in temperature; >30 C lower the biosorption
efciency. Fig. 4f represents the interactive effect of initial dye concentration and biosorbent dosage at constant stirring rate, process
time and temperature 100 rpm, 12 h and 30 C, respectively. The
RSM plot represents a highly statistically signicant positive interactive effect, which is also revealed by the contour lines. It is obvious
that at low biomass the biosorption was low, but with the increase
199
200
Table 4
Optimum conditions solutions for BB-41 biosorption by spent waste biomass of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Factors
Desirability
Number of trials
A(rpm)
B(h)
C( C)
D(mg/L)
E(wt%)
1
2
2
100
0
0
18
14
18
30
20
25
200
150
150
0.6
0.6
0.5
1
1
1
Biosorption %
Predicted
Experimental
100%
96%
96%
98%
94%
94%
Perecent error
Standard deviation
2%
2.08%
2.08%
0.023094
Fig. 5. UVvis spectrophotometer scan (a), Raman spectrum (b), size distribution number (c), TEM image (d) of the TiO2 hydrosol and SEM image of the biosorbent (e).
201
Table 5
Efciency of spent waste biomass of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for biosorption of different dyes.
Dye
Operation conditions
Biosorption percentage
References
Basic Blue 41
This work
[11]
[14]
Reactive Red 88
Acid Red 14
ln
C
o
Ct
= Kapp t
(4)
202
4. Conclusion
This study proved that factorial design analysis based on central
composite deign CCD of experiments and response surface methodology RSM are reliable and powerful tools for modeling, optimizing
and studying the interactive effects of ve important parameters
(stirring rate, process time and temperature, initial dye concentration and biosorbent dosage) in a batch biosorption process for
Basic Blue 41 dye using spent waste biomass of S. cerevisiae, that
recorded, maximum adsorption capacity of 23.5 mg/g and percentage dye removal of 94%.
The experiments showed that integration of the biosorption
with photo-catalytic oxidation using self-clean eluent; acid TiO2
hydrosol would be interesting for practical application, but detailed
techno-economic analysis should be performed. Firstly, the cationic
dyes would be removed effectively from aqueous efuents by readily available, low cost biosorbent, then the dye was desorbed and
photo-degraded by the same eluent; acid TiO2 hydrosol under UVillumination. Thus, would economize great volume of solvents and
it would not bring secondary pollution to the environment.
However, there are still more details needed to be investigated
in further study; the changes occurred on the biomass surface
after regeneration, optimization of the photo-degradation process,
reusability of the hydrosol and the applicability of this integrated
process for biotreatment of polluted water with different types of
dyes.
References
[1] A. Grses, A. Hassani, M. Kiransan, . Acisli, S. Karaca, Removal of Methylene
Blue from aqueous solution using untreated lignite as potential low-cost
adsorbent: kinetic, thermo-dynamic and equilibrium approach, J. Water
Process Eng. 2 (2014) 1021.
[2] M. Abbasi, N.R. Asl, Sonochemical degradation of Basic Blue 41 dye assisted by
nano TiO2 and H2 O2 , J. Hazard. Mater. 153 (2008) 942947.
[3] Y. Xing, D. Liu, L. -p. Zhang, Enhanced adsorption of Methylene Blue by
EDTA-modied sugarcane bagasse and photocatalytic regeneration of the
adsorbent, Desalination 259 (2010) 187191.