Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1
David (Nae) Florentina, 2Petrescu Horaiu, 3Mooiu Daniela, 4Bucur Venera
5
Gabriel Dinu, 3Ruia Ion Clin, 6Victor Silivestru, 2Marcel Berceanu-Vaduva, 7Bogdan
Nistor
1
analizei cu nla
tensiunilor
element
capetelefinit
genunchiului
cderea
cu a
alpha de 0,94.
Cazurile procesate au fost valide 100%, iar chestionarul poate fi considerat validat,
reproductibil datorita indicelui Cronbach.
Din analiza statistic pe categoriile de vrst ale pacienilor inclusi n studiu a fost
obtinut media categoriei de vrsta de 3,21 cu o deviaie standard de 0,582, categoria 3 avand o
raza de 46-65 ani. Cei mai muli respondeni au studii gimnaziale.
Pacienilor care au raspuns cu DA la testul de sreening pentru depresie n ultima lun vai simit de multe ori abtut, trist, deprimat sau fara speran sunt n proporie de 63%.
Scorul Piper total are o medie de 2,08 cu deviaie standard de 0,577 unde 0 nseamn
lipsa oboselii. n populaia clinic nu exista subieci cu 0 oboseal, 1 este variabila ordinar
pentru oboseala uoar, 2 pentru oboseala moderat, 3 pentru oboseala sever. Din analiza
statistic rezult c cei mai muli participanii la studiu au oboseala moderat.
n populaia clinic au fost inclui pacieni diagnosticati cu cancer cu urmatoarele
localizari:11 pacieni cu cancer pulmonar, 10 cu cancer mamar, 6- colon, 1-colorectal, 1cerebral,1-faringolaringian,1-laringe, 2-gastric, 1-LMNH, 2-cav. bucala, 2-orofarige, 3ovarian,1-pancreas, 2-rinofaringe, 1-spinal, 12,5%(6) au oboseal sever i scor ECOG 3,
16,6% (8) pacieni au oboseal moderat i scor ECOG 3 8,33%(4 ) au oboseal sever i scor
ECOG 2, 50% (24) din pacienii inclusi n studiu au oboseal moderat i scorul ECOG 2;
10,4%( 5) au oboseal moderat i scor ECOG 2, 2,08% (1) din cohorta de 48 pacien i prezinta
oboseal usoar i scor ECOG 1.
Concluzii
Scala Fatigabilitii Piper - 12, este un instrument util, reproductibil n evaluarea fatigabilitii la
bolnavii de cancer, indicele Cronbach alpha fiind de 0,94.
Bibliografie:
[1] Glaus A, Crow R, Hammond S. Fatigue n healthy and cancer patients. 1. A qualitative study
on conceptual analysis. Pflege 1999; pg 12
[2] Dittner AJ, Wessely SC, Brown RG. The assessment of fatigue: a practical guide for
clinicians and researchers. J Psychosom Res 2004; 56: 15770.
[3] Yellen SB, Cella DF,Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other
anemia-related symptoms with the Funcional
[4] Piper BF, Dibble SL, Dodd MJ, Weiss MC, Slaughter RE, Paul SM. The revised Piper
Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation n women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1998;
25: 67784.
[5] Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS et al. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer
patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer 1999; 85: 118696.
[6] Curt GA, Breitbart W, Cella D et al. Impact of cancerrelated fatigue on the lives of patients:
new findings from the fatigue coalition. Oncologist 2000; 5: 35360.
[7]. Vogelzang NJ, Breitbart W, Cella D et al. Patient, caregiver, and oncologist perceptions of
cancer-related fatigue: results of a tripart assessment survey. The fatigue coalition. Semin
Hematol 1997; 34: 412.
[8]. Glaus A. Fatigue n patients with cancer. Analysis and assessment. Recent Results Cancer