Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction
The methodology described in the previous chapter provided the baseline for
data-gathering. In this chapter, the presentation of data is systematically linked to the
format of the self-developed questionnaire attached in the appendix. The following will
be used to analyze data: description of the sample, main results, discussion,
presentation of data and interpretations of results.
This chapter will focus on the analysis and interpretation of data that was
collected for this study. According to De Vos (1998:203), data analysis entails that the
analyst break down data into constituent parts to obtain answers to research answers to
research questions and to test hypotheses. The analysis of the research data does not
in its own provide the answers to research questions.
The purpose of interpreting the data is to reduce it to an intelligible and
interpretable form so that the relations of research problems can be studied and tested,
and conclusions drawn. On the other hand, when the researcher interprets the research
results, he/she studies for their meaning and implications. The next section will discuss
the characteristics of the sample in order for the findings to be clearly understood.
MAIN RESULTS
The main results will draw on the description of the independent and dependent
variables of the study. Since the sample size was less than 100 respondents, the
researcher will mainly use raw frequencies to describe the biographic section of the
sample. The N-Value cannot exceed the total number of respondents. Frequency
distribution tables help the sample or to describe the sample. In other words, the
researcher becomes familiar with the demographic variables through the use of
frequency distribution tables.
CS WM
VI
Rank
AWM
WM
beneficial to them in the future as the technology rises and the demand for it will arise in
the next years.
Popularity got an average mean of 4.30, also a Satisfactory rating, which shows
that it is important to learn Photoshop and Vegas Pro because of its popularity. Almost
all skilled people nowadays use these software as their basis of editing and such. Best
example of it, is the Photoshop. Photoshop is popular also, because of its functionalities
given and its opportunity given if you have the skills in the Photoshop. Photoshop made
a breakthrough in the photo editing world since it provides almost all the tools needed.
Widely used got an average mean of 3.73, an Acceptable rating. Though
Photoshop is popular among others, the respondents seem find that Photoshop is hard
to understand and learn, and they see that there are more software or editing programs
that can be used like Pixlr, PicsArt and more. Since these software are available famous
platforms like Android, iOS and Windows, more respondents find it more wise to use
these software since it is only in their fingertips. This aspect was not much considered
by the respondents but still acceptable.
Necessity to learn got an average mean of 4.35, a Satisfactory rating, which
means that it is necessary to learn. Some schools offer courses regarding these
software, so they needed to learn this software. Some respondents commented that
they need to learn that aforementioned software because they find it amazing and they
see it also as trendy because they feel they have an edge regarding to that software.
Software Used
Rank
AWM
OS WM
CS WM
5
4
3
2
1
0
CS WM
OS WM
AWM
Rank
Over all, the Technology Used got an average mean of 4.12, a Satisfactory
rating, which means that Photoshop and Vegas Pro are important nowadays because of
its popularity and its importance. Respondents see that it is practical to learn these
software because its uses today and in the future. It is also important because they find
it practical to use because of the functionalities it can provide and also it provides a
good output that satisfy the needs of the user.
Table 2
Software Used Rating in a Bar Graph
Likewise, to a great extent, the respondents assessed that the contents of the
web program, ePhotoPro, has the enough resources and contents to attain the objective
of the web program, to cater the user the enough information it needed. Quiz items are
appropriate aspect got an overall weighted mean from the clients students and other
students, 4.03 and 4.56 respectively. This result affirms that quiz items that students
answered are relevant according to the different chapters in the web program.
Furthermore, the table reveals that the tools that are elaborated in the web
program are properly explained with a weighted mean of 3.89 and 4.20 respectively;
contents that are mentioned on the web program are also relevant and helpful with a
weighted mean of 34.39 and 4.20 respectively, seems that respondents find that content
on the web program widens their understanding according to the functionalities and the
things that they can do with the aforementioned software,; news are relevant and helpful
got a weighted mean of 3.56 and 3.89 respectively. According to the comments given by
the respondents, news that are in the web program are mostly will be ignored because
they are more focused on the tools and lessons that are provided the web program.