Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
I. INTRODUCTION
Aquaculture has emerged as one of those food producing
segments that is growing fast along with field crops and
livestock productivity [1]. The atmospheric catastrophe and
pollution impacts have been a major cause for the decline in
the quality of the captured fisheries. An increase in the fish
production does not imply that the captured fish is healthy and
safe for human consumption. Since fish is a perishable entity,
indicators such as freshness and quality are important for the
commercial success.
645
2016 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)
RGB to LAB
Colour Space
Conversion
Extracting a
channel from
LAB colour
space image
Area
Based
Threshold
Intensity
Based
Threshold
Thresholding
Segmented
Fish Gills
Correlation
between
Ground Truth
and Segmented
Gills
The gill colour and odour has been used as a parameter for
fish freshness by fishermen and customers till date. Also,
image processing techniques are non destructive and non
646
2016 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)
As is clear from the fig. 1, the gills have largest area among
the eyes and fins, so the pixels in binary image are grouped on
basis of area and then the labeled region of maximum area is
segmented as gills.
used to segment the gills and eyes from the image, which can
be seen in Fig 5(c). Some portion of the eye, which is
extracted along with the gills is treated as noise and needs to
be eliminated. It can be seen that the gills is the region of
largest area in the segmented binary image. So, an area based
threshold is applied to the binary image to segment the gills.
Fig. 4: LAB colour image (a) LAB (b) L channel (c) a channel (d) b
channel
Fig.5: Gills segmentation (a) Input RGB image (b) 'a' channel (c) intensity
based threshold (d) area based threshold
Fig. 3: Colour space conversion (a) Input RGB image (b) LAB colour space
Fig.6: Correlation (a) Input RGB image (b) Code segmented fish gills (c)
Ground truth segmented fish gills
647
2016 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)
Sample
Collection
Day
Correlation between
Ground Truth and
Code Segmented Gills
Day 1
0.8081
Day 2
0.8756
Day 3
0.8196
Day 4
0.8199
Day 5
0.8448
Day 6
0.8684
Day 1
0.924
Day 2
0.9106
Day 3
0.8599
S
No
3
4
9
10
Fish
Sample
Fish
Sample
1
Fish
Sample
2
Day 4
0.8578
11
Day 5
0.8872
12
Day 6
0.8461
13
Day 1
0.8569
14
Day 2
0.7576
Day 3
0.7291
Day 4
0.761
References
17
Day 5
0.8774
18
Day 6
0.7329
19
Day 1
0.7672
20
Day 2
0.842
Day 3
0.8021
Day 4
0.8527
23
Day 5
0.8479
24
Day 6
0.8217
15
16
21
22
Fish
Sample
3
Fish
Sample
4
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
Fig 7 Graph showing correlation coefficient between segmented and ground
truth fish gills
648
2016 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN)
649