Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
DR.SIRISHA KOMMURI
POST GRADUATE, 2012-2015
DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHODONTICS
NARAYANA DENTAL COLLEGE, NELLORE
Dr.N.T.R UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES,
VIJAYAWADA
S no
DATE
1.
3-07-12
07-08-12
18-10-12
12-11-12
5.
14-02-13
6.
18-04-13
7.
15-07-13
8.
28-09-13
9.
30-11-13
10
11-03-14
11
09-08-14
12
19-12-14
13
29-1-2015
14
11-2-2015
15
20-1-2015
16
4-3-2015
2. SEMINARS PRESENTED:- 12
S. NO
DATE
1.
28-05-12
2.
16-07-12
3.
3-10-12
4.
20-12-12
5.
18-02-13
6.
15-04-13
7.
1-07-13
8.
12-09-13
9.
27-11-13
10
09-01-14
11
24-06-14
12
11-10-14
13
22-1-2015
14
4-2-2015
15
17-2-2015
16
26-2-2015
Lasers in dentistry
Occlusion in implants
3.
Library dissertation:-
Wax
Investing
4) THESIS SYNOPSIS :-
Burnout
Casting
2NDMAY 2012.
b)REVIEW OF LITERATURE:
1) Nayoung jin et al (2009) conducted a study to compare and evaluate the wettability of
denture relining materials using contact angle measurements under air and water storage
overtime. In this study, author investigated nine denture relining materials which were:
Two heat curing polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) Lang, Vertex RS, One Self Cure
(PEMA) hard chair side reline resin Rebase II, six Silicone relining materials. These
were classified into three groups according to material composition: - Group 1: PMMA,
Group 2: PEMA, Group 3: silicone. Contact angles were measured using high drop shape
analysis system under three conditions: in air after setting, 1hr water storage, 24hrs water
storage. The results showed that contact angles of materials tested increased in the
following order: PMMA, PEMA, SILICONE and also wettability of denture relining
materials expect Rebase II & Mollosil plus were increased after 24hrs of water storage.
From the results obtained, author concluded that conventional heat cure resin had the
highest wettability suggesting that heat cured acrylic resin is material of choice for
denture relining materials.
.
Neelam Sharma, vidya chitre(2008) conducted a study to evaluate and compare the
wettability of distilled water and four saliva substitutes to heat polymerized acrylic
denture base resin. In this study the author prepared a total of 200 heat cure acrylic
samples of dimensions 2.5 x 1.5 x 2 mm which were divided in to five groups with 40
samples in each group: Distilled water was used in group-1, WET MOUTH in group-2,
AQWET in group-3, SALIVART in group-4, MOUTHKOTE in group-5 and then
advancing & receding contact angles of each of the saliva substitutes were measured
using contact angle Goniometer. The results showed that the group 3 (AQWET ) had the
lowest advancing and receding contact angle values and the highest angle of hysteresis on
heat cured acrylic resin when compared to other saliva substitutes and distilled water.
From the results obtained the author concluded that AQWET would have the best wetting
ability on dentures fabricated with heat cure acrylic resin material.
4) M.G.J Waters et al (1995) conducted a study to evaluate the wettability properties of soft
lining materials and a denture base material by use of the dynamic contact angle
technique. In this study the author evaluated the wettability of 5 soft liners and a heat cure
polymethylmethacrylate. Specimens of dimensions 20 mm x10 mmx1 mm were produced
for each material and specimens were tested by Cahn Contact angle analyzer. The results
showed that Coe super soft( soft liner) would be the most wetted materials, whereas two
soft liner materials ( Flexor , Novus) to be the least wetted and also that all soft lining
materials had significantly greater amount of contact angle hysteresis than heat cure
polymethylmethacrylate material. From the results obtained the author concluded that the
dentures lined with these materials would be more stable under dislodgement forces than
lined dentures.
5) Monsenego et al (1989) conducted a study to evaluate and compare the wettability of heat
polymerizing resins and autopolymerising resin to distilled water. In this study the author
prepared flat circular samples of 10 mm diameter and 1mm thickness of test denture base
material. Acrylic resins specimens were divided into 4 groups: untreated, polished, sand
abraded and coated with a photo polymerizing varnish. Ten test specimens of each of
these surfaces were used. The results showed that sand abraded heat polymerized resin
had the highest contact angle hysteresis. Upon immersion in water for 20min contact
angle of sand abraded group was 370 while untreated was 540 and polished was 440 and
auto polymerized resin showed results similar to heat polymerized resins but with low
hysteresis. All samples of varnished resins had almost same contact angle values. From
the results obtained the author concluded that sand abraded heat polymerized materials
would provide best retention for complete dentures.
METHODOLGY:
One Twenty (120) flat rectangular shaped specimens are fabricated with heat cure
Each group(I&II) are again divided into two Subgroups(A&B) of 30 specimens each
based on storage as:
Subgroup A (30) Specimens stored in air
Subgroup B (30) specimens stored in water for 24 hrs.
The specimens which are prepared in above set manner are subjected to contact angle
analysis using Goniometer.
The obtained values are tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis
8) REFERENCES:1. NA YOUNG JIN, HO RIM LEE, HEESU LEE AND AHRAN PAE:
Wettability of denture relining materials under water storage over time
(J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 March; 1(1): 15).
2. ALCIBIADES ZISSIS, Dr DENT/ STAVROS YANNIKAKIS, Dr DENT/ ROBERT
G. JAGGER, MARK G. J. WATERS:
Wettability of denture materials
(Quintessence Int 2001; 31:457-462).
S.NO
DATE
27/07/12 to
29/07/12
05/12/12 to
09/12/12
14/06/13 to
16/06/13
13/11/13 to
17/11/13
01/12/12 to
02/12/12
6.
14/09/12 t0
15/09/12
7.
06/06/14 to
08/06/14
S.NO DATE
03/06/2012
24/08/2012
6/02/2013
7/05/2013
29 06/2013
25-2-14
05-07-14
Topic of presentation
Presented at
14th IPS PG
convention,
Mangalore
1.
2.
40 IPS PG
Conference
Chennai
3.
15th IPS PG
convention,
Ghaziabad
4.
41st IPS PG
conference,
Ahmedabad
5.
Topic of presentation
splints in Temporomandibular joint
Disorders
Presented at
IDEAS program ,2013
9.PRECLINICALS:
1. Conventional dentures
CLASS I
CLASS- II
CLASS II
2. Balanced Dentures
3. Cast Partial Dentures
4. Tooth Preparations.
10.CLINICAL CASES:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.