Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
69
Specific gravity
% Clay
Gadt Cl
Keuper Marl
2.73
2.69
39
54
23
71
48
25
Iastic hnut
Liquid limit
PlasticitY index
37
(%)
(%)
a:
London Clay
61
able 1 Bastcmatena
ic material properties of the soils.
Soil
betw
The relationship
'
atxoandelas
Water
er
o t t
on
Sample
type
'
'
Keuper
Suction
(kp a))
38.0
19.2
.9
Gault
Clay
-6.9
For p ave
vementdesignpurposesses s
har t
db th Calif
em iri
netration
tration te
testt dev
developed for use with empuical
I
1230
1390
1525
1670
88.7
92.1
95.4
98.6
1410
92.7
'elies
ofso'oils
1984
s with elastic stiffness have been
er of load applicatio
th
ns etween resilient Young's
'ca
'
an
rt'B
'e
actorinpavem
bitmarke
al 1975 P
o
pro
Consequently, a uni ue
rationtestin
vi ra
basedonwi
sed on widespread field vibra
)and
(He
p,
''aterials
E, = 17.6CBRO M Pa
to a
duty pavements,
4 Road Re
18.0
37.5
56.0
77.5
92.6
gn computations
E, = 10CBRMPa
1640
1745
90
76.0
i
saturation
Introduction
(B o
density
17 9
21 4
Liiquidity
ld
ry
owell
et
desi
Y
tt
inh
t
dSt
he principal
suect
Y
test specimen is
at a wide range of str
iono thedatatod
v ue
u
involves us
1n
sub
e . uchcasesinclud
en stodeducel
procedures (
ur
'ss
evaluuaflon
correlated with CBR is cle
s
single value of stiffness
e ta reported in this paper hi hli
ee compacted clays and the rel
andCBRisexamin
'd
d.
the
va ue is likely to be infl uencedbothb
'
'
o'raclayintheundrain
e d situation) andbyy
o
ora
shearstre
s re gus
B
db
'
do
d'h
'
td
's
astic response of
involve us
Current
ent methods
m
a in 'catorofthe
lk
Marl
ar mo
m
o
London Clay. Their b
aregivenin
dried and powdered. S
till d
t to h
was attained. The mo
o" po
regions of dry soiL D
ll
e o test are given below.
GROUND
ENGINEERING
27
. OCTOBER
1990
100
r0
5 10-
Key
~ Keuper
Marl
10
Keuper Marl
Gault Clay
London Clay
5 20
20
+
o
Clay
London Clay
30
+ Gault
o
Key
30
10
50
60
Water
Content
2'0
rr
70
(%)
10
20
30
r0
50
70
80
90
80
-10
'l00
~
/
and liquidity
The experiments
Independent series of repeated load triaxial tests and CBR tests
were performed. The results of the triaxial tests were related to
those of the CBR test by means of the soil moisture contents which
were, for each soil type, assumed to be uniquely related to the soil
suction. The relationship between water content and suction for each
soil was determined in an ancillary series of tests using the Rapid
Suction Apparatus developed by the TRRL (Dumbleton and West,
1968). The soil was mixed at high moisture content and 'dried
stages by the addition of soil powder with suction measurements
being made at the end of each stage. The results are summarised in
Figure l showing values obtained as the water content reduced.
down'n
Triaxial testing
The water contents, densities and related data for all the triaxial
specimens are given in Table 2. The soil suction values were
determined from the water contents using the curve in Figure
The range of water contents selected for the Keuper Marl
specimens represented the likely in-situ conditions and was based on
related work on saturated material described by Loach (1987).The
water contents used for Gault Clay and London Clay were such that a
broadly similar range of soil suction was obtained for each soil. This
was considered desirable as both CBR and elastic stiffness have been
shown to depend on the level of suction (Black, 1962, Brown, 1979).
For the range considered, a reasonably unique relationship was
demonstrated between soil suction and liquidity index as shown by
Figure 2. This is useful for estimating soil suction and, hence, both
CBR and elastic stiffness as illustrated by the results which follow as
well as the previous work referenced above.
When thoroughly mixed at the correct water content, the soil was
compacted into a cylindrical split mould 75mm in diameter and 150mm
long using hand tamping with a 12mm diameter rod. Following
compaction, the sample was removed from the mould and fitted with a
neoprene membrane. On-sample instrumentation was then fitted to
allow axial deformation to be determined using four LVDTs
measuring over a central gauge length using the principle shown in
Figure 3. Radial deformations were measured with a strain gauged
hoop (described by Boyce and Brown, 1976) but the results proved
unreliable and were not used. Following manufacture, the specimens
were allowed to stand for one day to improve the water content
uniformity and were then tested unconfined.
The deviator stress was applied using a pneumatically controlled
actuator operating at a constant frequency of 1Hz, the deviator load
being measured by a strain-gauged load cell immediately above the
1,2,3,y
28
OCTOBER
1990
LVDT's
cell
l.
sample.
Figure 3:
Deformation
instrumentation
usedin tri axial
apparatus.
Soil
Type
Keuper Marl
Gault Clay
London Clay
Gauge
ttZt
Axial
Strain
2740 x 10
2640 x 10
1690 x 10
Table 3:Experimentally-derived
elastic stiffness and CBR.
to
length.
LtZ,
QZ3 +
ttZ
ZG-Zs
Stiffness Constants
A
all connected
base.
CBR Constants
2.1
1.35
0.0145
0.019
0.018
-0.621
0.417
0.216
1.27
70
E
Symbol
200
100
))LE)
r~r
400
80
rg
(a)
Keuper
Marl
g
.8
20
10
30
20
10
40
50
70
$0
100
Ej)LE)
Symbol
2N
(b) Gault
10
0
10
30
20
40
50
S (kPa)
70
00
$0
1N
10
8
CBR(%)
12
14
Since both resilient Youngs modulus (E,) and CBR are related to
the suction, it is possible to derive a relationship between E, and
CBR. Combining equations (4) and (5) gives:
$0
Symbol
CBR- D
E = q /log
AL Cq,
))LE)
50
x 10
(c) London
30
clay
're
10
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
00
$0
100
S (kPa)
Figure 4: Axial strain 'contours'for three partially saturated
soils.
Suction,
as:
t=A ~
where A and B are material constants, q, is the deviator stress pulse
and S is the suction. The coefficients A and B are given in Table 3. In
terms of resilient Young's modulus (E,), equation (3) leads to:
Conclusions
logCBR
NN
clay
0
0
QN
ON
E
v
40
20
Suction, S (kPa)
60
= C.S+ D
....
3.
29
900
~ sr =10 CBR
100
CBR
IO
(%)
Acknowledgements
The contents of this paper are drawn from research supported by a
contract from the Transport & Road Research Laboratory. The work
was carried out within the Pavement Research Group, Department of
Civil Engineering at the University of Nottingham.
References
Black, W (1962), 'A method of estimating the California Bearing Ratio of cohesive soils
from plasticity data', Geofechnique, Vol 12, No 4, pp271-282.
Boyce, JR and Brown, SF (1976), 'Measurement of elastic strain in granular material',
Geotechnique, Vol 26, No 4, pp637-640.
British Standards Institute (1975), 'Methods of test for soils for engineering purposes',
BS 1377.
Brown, SF (1979), 'The characteristics of cohesive soils for flexible pavement design',
Proc 7th European Conf, Soil Mech and Found Eng, Vol 2, pp15-22.
Brown, SF & Brunton, JM, (1984), 'Improvements to pavement subgrade strain
criterion', Journ Transp Eng, ASCE, Vol 110, No 6, pp551-567.
Brown, SF, Brunton, JM & Stock, AF, (1985), 'The analytical design of bituminous
I
120
100
00
CI
60
I
IJJ
IB
20
0
0
10
(%)
Figure 7: The relationship between stiffness and CBR at a
deviator stress pulse of40kpa.
CBR
GROUND
ENGINEERING
OCTOBER
1990