INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: __May Ann B. Samejon____

Name of Rater: MRS. FE D. LO
Position: ___Teacher 2____________________
Position: T.L.E-H.E DEPT. HEAD
Review Period: _JUNE 2016- NOVEMBER 2016
Date of Review: NOV. 2016
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: PASAY CITY (PASAY CITY EAST HIGH SCHOOL)
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

M
F
O
s

ACTUAL RESULTS
KRAS

Teaching
Learning
Process
(40%)

OBJECTIVE

TIME
LINE

1. Prepared daily lesson

plans /daily logs of activities
including appropriate,
adequate and updated
instructional materials within
the rating period.

June,
2016
to
Nov.,
2016

2. Facilitated learning in the

school through functional
lesson plans, daily logs and
innovative teaching
strategies

June,
2016
to
Nov.,
2016

3. Monitored attendance,
diversity appreciation, safe,
positive and motivating
environment, overall
physical atmosphere,
cleanliness and orderliness
of classrooms including
proper waste disposal daily.

June,
2016
to
Nov.,
2016

Weight
Per
KRA
15%

15%

10%

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q- (5) 100% DLP/DLL and
instructional materials prepared
T- (5) DLP/DLL and instructional
materials prepared as scheduled.
Q-(4) 90-99% facilitated through
functional instructional materials
with innovative integration.
T-(5) Facilitated functional lesson
plan on time.

Q- (5) 100% of attendance

diversity appreciations, safe,
positive and motivating
environment, overall physical
atmosphere, were monitored.
T-(5) Required accomplished
monitoring report submitted on
time/as scheduled.

RATING
Q

Ave.

SCORE*

Pupil/
Student
Outcome

1.Monitored and evaluated

and maintained
pupils/students progress

15%
June,
2016
to
Nov.,
2016

(40%)
2. Conducted remediation/
enrichment programs to
improve performance
indicators

Communit
y
Involveme
nt
(10%)

Quart
erly

15%

3. Attained the required

MPS for grade level and
learning areas.

June,
2016
to
Nov.,
2017

1. Conducted regular PTA

meetings/ conferences.

Quart
erly

3%

2. Visited parents of
students needing academic
monitoring /follow-up within
the rating period.

Quart
erly

4%

3. Undertaken/ Initiated
projects/events/activities
with external
funding/sponsorship within

Seme
stral

3%

10%

Q- (4) 90-99% of the evidences

and varied assessments were
evaluated and monitored through
the pupils outcome.
T- (5) Accomplished the evidences
and varied assessments as
scheduled and submitted on
time/as scheduled

Q-(3) Conducted
remediation/enrichment program to
80-89% of the identified learners.
T- (5) Remediation/Enrichment
Program was conducted on time or
as scheduled.
Q- (4) 70 -79% MPS

Q- (3) Conducted two (2) PTA

meetings and four (4) conferences
with 70-79% attendance.
T-(5) Conducted PTA meetings as
needed and conferences per
grading period.
Q-(3) 70-79% of the identified
parents were visited
Q-(4) 90 to 99% accomplishment
of initiated
projects/events/activities.

the target date.

1. Conducted Action
Profession Research

al Growth
and
Developm
ent
(10%)

2. Initiated/Participated in
co-curricular school
activities within the rating
period
3. Produced
publication/Creative work
for school paper/Pasay
educourier/ DepEd post or
any national circulation
within the target date

Q-(2) Identified classroom learning

problems with research proposal
T-(5) Completed the Action
Research within the prescribed
date.

Yearly

2%

June
2016
to
Nov.,
2016

5%

Q- (5) Initiated and participated at

least 2 co-curricular school
activities with documented results

3%

Q-(2) Produced
publication/creative work in school

Nov.,
2016

OVERALL RATING
ACCOMPLISHMENT

*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.

MRS. FE D. LO
HEAD, T.L.E-H.E DEPARTMENT
Rater

MRS. MAY ANN B. SAMEJON

TEACHER 2
Ratee