Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
607616, 2016
Copyright 2016 Elsevier Inc.
Printed in the USA. All rights reserved
0736-4679/$ - see front matter
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.09.014
Clinical
Review
COOLING METHODS IN HEAT STROKE
Flavio G. Gaudio, MD* and Colin K. Grissom, MD
*Division of Emergency Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York and
Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah
Reprint Address: Flavio G. Gaudio, MD, Division of Emergency Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center,
525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065
INTRODUCTION
Heat stroke is a life-threatening illness characterized by
an altered level of consciousness with an elevated core
body temperature $40 C. It may develop in persons
exerting themselves in a hot environment; or susceptible,
sedentary persons during periods of high ambient temperatures. Victims of advanced heat stroke require transportation to a medical facility capable of critical care
management of multiple organ failure, though treatment
of heat stroke should begin as early as possible in the prehospital setting. The primary goals of treatment for heat
stroke are lowering core body temperature and supporting
organ system function. The pathophysiology and clinical
manifestations of heat stroke have been described in
detail elsewhere (1,2). The focus of this article is to
review the available evidence on the principal cooling
methods used in the treatment of heat stroke.
To this end, we conducted a PubMed search of journal
articles applicable to the cooling of human subjects with
heat strokeusing the key words heat stroke and
cooling. References in these journal articles in turn
were searched for additional relevant studies. Original
studies and reviews commonly cited in the heat-stroke
literature, as well as noteworthy recent additions to this
literature, are summarized below (Tables 16) (321).
Historically, heat stroke has been divided into two
broad categories. Exertional heat stroke may develop in
able-bodied individuals such as athletes, soldiers, or
laborers performing rigorous physical activity in a hot
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Loma Linda University - SCELC April 18, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
608
Number of Subjects
Cooling Technique
Outcomes
No mortality or morbidity
Ice-water immersion
No mortality
No mortality
Number of Subjects
Cooling Technique
44 hospital patients,
mean age 61 y
28 ED patients,
mean age 71 y
Outcomes
32% mortality
14% mortality; 14%
neurological morbidity
ED = emergency department.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Loma Linda University - SCELC April 18, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
609
Number of Subjects
Cooling Technique
Outcomes
No mortality or neurological
morbidity
Mortality 2%; neurological
morbidity 8%
Mortality 11%
Mortality 15%
have used a heterogeneous range of subjects: healthy volunteers exercising in hot, humid conditions; military recruits or miners operating in the field; patients admitted
to hospitals during heat waves; and pilgrims traveling
in desert environments (35,9,13,14,1720).
Of the studies comparing different cooling methods,
those involving randomized trials generally have been
performed on healthy volunteers and have enrolled
relatively few subjects. The remaining studies on treating
heat-stroke patients have, for the most part, been
case-series reports or nonrandomized comparisons of
treatment methodswith considerable variations in the
baseline characteristics of subjects from one study to
the next. Moreover, findings in case-series reports may
have limited applicability based on the retrospective
collection of incomplete data. For these reasons, the
historical record has not settled upon one undisputed
method for cooling heat-stroke patients. Still, despite
such limitations, this record has promoted two methods
of cooling overall: 1) in exertional heat stroke, conductive
cooling via ice-water immersion of the patient; and 2) in
nonexertional heat stroke, evaporative and convective
cooling via the application of sprayed water and forced
air currents over the body.
Ice-water Immersion in Exertional Heat Stroke
(Tables 1 and 5)
Immersion cooling, in which subjects have been partly
submerged to the upper torso or neck in baths of cold
water (Figure 1), has resulted in variable cooling rates
depending on the water temperature used. In a small study
of young, healthy volunteers who exercised to a core
Number of Subjects
Cooling Technique
Outcomes
7% mortality; 0% neurological
morbidity
Mortality 21%
Majority of patients cooled <1 h
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Loma Linda University - SCELC April 18, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
610
Number of Subjects
Cooling Technique
Outcomes
25 experimental conditions
among 5 subjects
Comparison of evaporative +
convective cooling to ice packs
28 experimental conditions
among 7 subjects
38 experimental conditions
among 6 subjects
42 experimental conditions
among 6 subjects
Number of Subjects
16 healthy volunteers
Cooling Technique
30 mL/kg IV bolus over 30 min of cold
(4 C) vs. room temperature (23 C)
saline
Outcomes
Reduction of core body temperature by
1 C in cold saline group and 0.5 C in
room-temperature saline group
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Loma Linda University - SCELC April 18, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
611
Figure 1. Conductive cooling: ice-water immersion in exertional heat stroke. The collapsed runner with a core temperature of nearly 41 C (106 F) is immediately cooled in a large
rubber tub containing ice water, with rescuers supporting
the head and upper body. Photograph courtesy of the Korey
Stringer Institute: ksi.uconn.edu. Used with permission,
2014.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Loma Linda University - SCELC April 18, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
612
Figure 2. Evaporative plus convective cooling: the bodycooling unit. Overhead pipes spray cool water mist onto the
patient. Strong air currents are created by electric fans
(pictured) or a tubular framework, which blows compressed
air. Reprinted from: Pang HN, Mong R, Lee VJ, Chua WC,
Seet (B) Treatment of exertional heat injuries with portable
body cooling unit in a mass endurance event. Lancet 2010;
28:2468; 2010; with permission from Elsevier (31).
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Loma Linda University - SCELC April 18, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
613
Figure 3. Combined cooling methods. Removal of the patients clothes aids in heat loss through radiation. Cubed
ice applied by basin over and alongside the patients body
melts and cools through conduction. Flexible hosing directs
compressed air at the patients wet skinachieving cooling
through evaporation plus convection. Spray bottles may be
used to keep the skin continuously wet during cooling; and
large room fans may be used instead of compressed air.
Photograph by Flavio Gaudio, MD, 2015.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Loma Linda University - SCELC April 18, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
614
ment of heat-related illness. The authors acknowledge the contributions of their colleagues on the practice guidelines working
group toward a better understanding of this topic.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence supports both immersion and evaporative methods for cooling of heat-stroke victims. The historical record has shown that ice-water immersion until
core body temperature falls below 39 C is safe and highly
effective for young, athletic patients with exertional heatstroke. In this population, the water temperature most
often used has been 0 C10 C. Among elderly study
subjects with nonexertional heat stroke, the weight of
experience has involved evaporative and convective cooling to a core body temperature near 38 C. Evaporative
cooling in elderly patients may offer several theoretical
advantages, such as greater patient comfort and less agitation, as well as easier access to patients who may need
advanced monitoring or resuscitation. Considerable variation in cooling rates with evaporative cooling, however,
has suggested that this method is more dependent on the
specific technique used. At a minimum, such technique
must ensure that a sufficient quantity of water and
strength of air currents be applied to the heat-stroke
patient.
Based on the evidence, we recommend that patients
with heat stroke in a medical facility be treated as soon
as possible with either conductive cooling by wholebody ice-water immersion (preferential method in exertional heat stroke); or evaporative and convective cooling
by a combination of cool water spray with continual
airflow over the body (acceptable alternative in elderly
patients with nonexertional heatstroke). Cooling should
continue until core body temperature is 38 39 C. Either
cooling method may be augmented by the addition of
cold intravenous saline if hydration is needed. Evaporative and convective cooling may be augmented with the
addition of ice packs or crushed ice over the whole
body to promote conductive cooling.
Regardless of the cooling method used, mortality and
morbidity have been higher in older patients with heat
stroke, due in part to the preexisting diseases and baseline
characteristics of this population.
There is insufficient evidence to recommend utilization of an intravascular cooling device, noninvasive
external cooling system, body cavity lavage, or antipyretic agents. Dantrolene is not recommended in the treatment of heat stroke. Evidence is lacking to support the use
of cooling blankets or ice packs placed strategically to the
neck, axilla, and groin as primary cooling methods.
AcknowledgmentsBrief excerpts of this review article written
by the authors have appeared also in the Wilderness Medical
Societys 2013 practice guidelines on the prevention and treat-
REFERENCES
1. Bouchama A, Knochel JP. Heat stroke. N Engl J Med 2002;346:
197888.
2. Lipman GS, Eifling KP, Ellis MA, Gaudio FG, Otten EM,
Grissom CK. Wilderness Medical Society practice guidelines for
the prevention and treatment of heat-related illness. Wilderness
Environ Med 2013;24:35161.
3. Beller GA, Boyd AE. Heat stroke: a report of 13 consecutive cases
without mortality despite severe hyperpyrexia and neurologic
dysfunction. Mil Med 1975;140:4647.
4. Costrini AM, Pitt HA, Gustafson AB, Uddin DE. Cardiovascular
and metabolic manifestations of heat stroke and severe heat exhaustion. Am J Med 1979;66:296302.
5. ODonnell TF. Acute heat stroke. Epidemiologic, biochemical,
renal, and coagulation studies. JAMA 1975;234:8248.
6. Costrini A. Emergency treatment of exertional heatstroke and comparison of whole body techniques. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990;22:158.
7. Demartini JK, Casa DJ, Stearns R, et al. Effectiveness of cold water
immersion in the treatment of exertional heat stroke at the Falmouth
Road Race. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015;47:2405.
8. Shibolet S, Coll R, Gilat T, Sohar E. Heatstroke: its clinical picture
and mechanism in 36 cases. Q J Med 1967;36:52548.
9. Ferris EB, Blankenhorn MA, Robinson HW, Cullen GE. Heat
stroke: clinical and chemical observations on 44 cases. J Clin Invest
1938;17:24961.
10. Hart GR, Anderson RJ, Crumpler CP, Shulkin A, Reed G,
Knochel JP. Epidemic classical heat stroke: clinical characteristics
and course of 28 patients. Medicine 1982;61:18997.
11. Al-Aska AK, Abu-Aisha H, Yaqub B, Al-Harthi SS, Sallam A.
Simplified cooling bed for heatstroke. Lancet 1987;329:381.
12. Bouchama A, Cfege A, Devol EB, et al. Ineffectiveness of dantrolene sodium in the treatment of heatstroke. Crit Care Med 1991;
19:17680.
13. Khogali M, Weiner JS. Heat stroke: report on 18 cases. Lancet 1980;
2:2768.
14. Khogali M, al Khawashki M. Heat stroke during the Makkah
pilgrimage. Saudi Med J 1981;2:8593.
15. Graham BS, Lichtenstein MJ, Hinson JM, Theil GB. Nonexertional
heatstroke: physiologic management and cooling in 14 patients.
Arch Intern Med 1986;146:8790.
16. Vicario SJ, Okabajue R, Haltom T. Rapid cooling in classic heatstroke: effect on mortality rates. Am J Emerg Med 1986;4:3948.
17. Kielblock AJ, Van Rensburg JP, Franz RM. Body cooling as a
method for reducing hyperthermia. S Afr Med J 1986;69:37880.
18. Proulx CI, Ducharme MB, Kenny GP. Effect of water temperature
on cooling efficiency during hyperthermia in humans. J Appl Physiol 2003;94:131723.
19. Weiner JS, Khogali M. A physiological body cooling-unit for the
treatment of heat stroke. Lancet 1980;1:5079.
20. Wyndham CT, Strydom NB, Cooke HM, et al. Methods of cooling
subjects with hyperpyrexia. J Appl Physiol 1959;14:7716.
21. Moore TM, Callaway CW, Hostler D. Core temperature cooling in
healthy volunteers after rapid infusion of cold and room temperature saline solution. Ann Emerg Med 2008;51:1539.
22. Wyndham CH. Adaptation to heat and cold. In: Lee DHK,
Minard D, eds. Physiology, environment, and man. New York:
Academic Press; 1970:177205.
23. Dhainaut JF, Claessens YE, Ginsburg C, Riou B. Unprecedented
heat-related deaths during the 2003 heat wave in Paris: consequences on emergency departments. Crit Care 2004;8:12.
24. Berko J, Ingram DD, Shubhayu S, Parker JD. Deaths attributed
to heat, cold, and other weather events in the United States,
20062010. Natl Health Stat Report 2014;76:115.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Loma Linda University - SCELC April 18, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
615
30. Becker JA, Stewart LK. Heat-related illness. Am Fam Physician
2011;83:132530.
31. Pang HN, Mong RP, Lee VJ, Chua WC, Seet B. Treatment of exertional heat injuries with portable body cooling unit in a mass endurance event. Am J Emeg Med 2010;28:2468.
32. Poulton TJ, Walker RA. Helicopter cooling of heatstroke victims.
Aviat Space Environ Med 1987;58:35861.
33. Horowitz BZ. The golden hour in heat stroke: use of iced peritoneal
lavage. Am J Emerg Med 1989;7:6169.
34. Broessner G, Beer R, Franz G, et al. Case report: severe heat stroke
with multiple organ dysfunctiona novel intravascular treatment
approach. Crit Care 2005;9:R498501.
35. Hong JY, Lai YC, Chang CY, Chang SC, Tang GJ. Successful treatment of severe heatstroke with therapeutic hypothermia by a noninvasive external cooling system. Ann Emerg Med 2012;59:4913.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Loma Linda University - SCELC April 18, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
616
ARTICLE SUMMARY
1. Why is this topic important?
In the United States, from 2006 to 2010, there were at
least 3332 deaths attributed to heat stroke. Rapid, effective cooling is fundamental to treatment.
2. What does this review attempt to show?
Although large, controlled trials are lacking, both icewater immersion and evaporative plus convective cooling
have a demonstrated track record in the treatment of heat
stroke.
3. What are the key findings?
Ice-water immersion has been shown to be highly
effective in exertional heat stroke, with a zero fatality
rate in large case series of younger, fit patients. In older
patients with nonexertional heat stroke, studies have
more often promoted evaporative plus convective cooling.
4. How is patient care impacted?
Heat-stroke patients should be cooled by the methods
most supported by clinical experiencenamely, icewater immersion (preferential method in exertional heat
stroke) or evaporative plus convective cooling. Evaporative plus convective cooling may be augmented by
crushed ice or ice packs applied diffusely to the body.
Chilled intravenous fluids may also supplement primary
cooling. Ice packs applied strategically to the neck, axilla,
and groin; cooling blankets; and intravascular or external
cooling devices should not be considered primary cooling
methods in heat stroke.
Downloaded from ClinicalKey.com at Loma Linda University - SCELC April 18, 2016.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright 2016. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.