Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
and23,
Temperature
......................Measurement
MAPANCalibration
- Journal ofof
Metrology
Society Humidity
of India, Vol.
No. 2, 2008;(RHT)
pp. 115-121
Abstract
This paper reports the calibration of special type of relative humidity and temperature sensor, which
gives the output in terms of millivolts, measured by precision digital multimeter (DMM) to further
estimation of relative humidity in the range of 25 %RH to 95 %RH. The sensor has been calibrated
against the standard aspirated psychrometer having a pair of matched dry and wet bulb quartz
thermometers. The temperature of wet bulb thermometer is effectively depressed when a ventilated
airflow is maintained at a speed more than 3 metre/second. The relative humidity of reference standard
psychrometer is computed using psychrometric equation to relate with the output of the RH indicator
under comparison. The paper also describes the details of estimation and expression of expanded
uncertainty in the calibration of the sensor at measured relative humidity. A sufficient number of data
were undertaken to evaluate the uncertainty at a confidence-level of approximately 95% for a normal
probability distribution.
1.
Introduction
Experimental Setup
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
3.
Calibration Procedure
(1)
where
Psd = Saturation vapour pressure of water vapour at
the dry bulb temperature (td)
Pd = Vapour pressure of water vapour at dry bulb
temperature (td)
Pd = Psw - AP (td -tw)
(2)
where
td = dry-bulb temperature (C)
tw = wet-bulb temperature ( C)
(td - tw) = depression (C)
Psw = Saturation vapour pressure of water vapour
at the wet bulb temperature (tw)
116
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for calibration of RHT sensor
A = Psychrometric constant, 0.000666 / C for
moving air
P =
(3)
Evaluation of Uncertainty
(4)
(5)
U(RH) = k x uc(RH)
(6)
u2 [RH(C)]
u3 [RH(A)]
u4 [RH(P)]
u5 [RH(D)]
117
u7 [RH(RO)]
ua = 0.062272 % RH
4.3 Evaluation of Type 'B' Components of Uncertainty,
(uiB)
Table 1
Observation
S.No.
RH % of
Ref. Std
DUC reading
Vi, in Volts
Deviation from
average in V, (Vi-Vavg)
(Vi-Vavg )2
in volts
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Mean
50.951
50.862
50.861
50.922
50.892
50.928
51.010
50.650
50.314
50.240
50.763 % RH
0.510
0.509
0.507
0.508
0.507
0.507
0.507
0.506
0.505
0.503
Vavg = 0.5069
3.1 x 10-3
2.1 x 10-3
1 x 10-4
1.1 x 10-3
1 x 10-4
1 x 10-4
1 x 10-4
-9 x 10-4
-1.9 x 10-3
-3.9 x 10-3
9.61 x 10-6
4.41 x 10-6
1 x 10-8
1.21 x 10-6
1 x 10-8
1 x 10-8
1 x 10-8
8.1 x 10-7
3.61 x 10-6
1.521 x 10-5
= 3.49 x 10-5
118
(8)
= [uc(RH)]4/[ui(RH)4/i] = 113738
(9)
Uncertainty Budget
Source of
Uncertainty
Estimated
Value
Std.
Uncertainty
(a)
(b)
Probability
Distribution
Divisor
(c)
50.69 % RH
Normal Type B, 2
0.5
u2 (Hum. Oven)
0.7325
Rectangular Type B, 3
0.423
u3 (Resolution)
5x10-6 V
Rectangular Type B, 3
u4 (Drift)
0.06686
Rectangular Type B, 3
u5 (Round off)
0.07
Rectangular Type B, 3
(ua) Repeatability
0.5069 V
(uc) Combined
Uncertainty
u1 (Ref. Std.)
(U)
Expanded
Uncertainty
50.69 % RH
Sensitivity Uncertainty
Degree
Coefficient Contribution
of
ci
(% RH)
Freedom
(d)
f = (b/c).d
1 x 102 % 2.8867513x10-4
RH /V
1
0.0386
1
Normal Type A, 10
1 x 102%
-3
1.962074 x 10
uc = ui2 = 0.6602498 % RH
eff = 113737
U = uc x k =1.3204996
119
0.04041
0.062272
RH /V
0.6602498
1.32 %RH
Value of Ref.
Std. (RH %)
1.
2.
3.
25.25
50.76
95.47
RH%
0.2489
0.5069
0.9261
24.89
50.69
92.61
1.32
1.32
1.32
Acknowledgement
(10)
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
G. Scholz, PTB
Communication.
[9]
[10]
Expanded Uncertainty of
measurement, % RH
Conclusion
(Germany)
Private
[15]
[11]
[16]
[12]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[13]
[14]
121