Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A well groomed, updated and awarded employee in an organization is just like a close
circuit hidden camera. This sentence speaks a lot about the importance of human resource
development and its increasing popularity and widely practiced character in industrial and
business world. Indian Rural banking scenario is not an exception to this. Many challenging
issues are being experienced in the process of HRD. Prominent among them are to include: (i)
whether the expenses incurred on HRD practices and measures are to be treated as revenue
expenditure or capital expenditure; (ii) how to retain the human resources once they are
developed in the organization, and (iii) how to overcome the resistance shown by the employees
for undergoing HRD process. Against these challenges, there is a belief among bank employees
that they extend full co-operation to the HRD efforts and are ready to accept the change.
Therefore, a research work entitled "Human Resource Practices In Regional Rural Banks With
Special Reference To Prathma Bank In Moradabad Region has been undertaken to know the
perceptions of the bank employees in this field.
Introduction
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
37.29
d.f.
27
Significance
0.05
Position
Ho Accepted
The tabulated value of X2 at 5% level of significance with 27 d.f. is 40.11. Since the
calculated value is less than the critical value. Therefore, we do not have enough evidence to
reject the null hypothesis (Ho).
Thus, it is concluded that there is no significant difference between HRD activities followed in
Prathma bank and HRM Practices followed in general.
Hypothesis 2
The following hypothesis aims to find out whether the HRD climate existing in Prathma
Bank is having the relationship with HRM practices followed in general or not.
Ho: There is no significant difference between HRD climate in Prathma bank and HRM Practices
in general.
H1: There is significant difference between HRD climate in Prathma bank and HRM Practices in
general
For analyzing the relationship, Chi-Square(X2) was used. Table below presents the related
information.
d.f.
Significance
Position
46.1
36
0.05
Ho Accepted
The critical value of the Chi-Square with 36 degrees of freedom at 5% level of
significance equals 50.99. Since the sample value of X2 is less than the critical value, there is not
enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
Volume-3 | Issue-11 | May-2014
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9