Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Santiago Urbiztondo
Documento de Trabajo Nro. 3
Octubre 1997
www.depeco.econo.unlp.edu.ar
RAMSEY
Santiago
REGULATION
Urbiztondo
Address: Av.
C6rdoba
637,
4to. piso,
(1054)
Argentina
Tel.: (541)314-1990;
FAX:(541)314-8648;
e-mail: santiago@fiel.org.ar
Buenos
Aires,
Abstract:
1.
Introduction.
This paper presents briefly the problem that comes out when the
composition of
the
total
cost of a
regulated
multiproduct
at
equilibrium,
cost between fixed and variable components, even when the variable
costs of
in
estimations
telecommunications,
for
instance,
where
different
(Burns
2.
The
model.
(up to the joint fixed cost in the last case). The problem then is
the following:
+ X[PJqJ
q1+P,(q,)
g,-c,q,-c,q,-4
where
91
(qi) =
Pi (Si) dqi,
for i=1,2
the
first-order
conditions
that
= 0,
=a = b,q, + X [a,-2b2q2-c,]
= 0,
LA = (a,-b,q,) sl + (a,-b,q,)
q2-clql-c2q2-a=o.
1;
expression:
(a2
42' =
.[ 12
-1/z
a,-c,
-c2)
b,+
4b,cr (a2-c2)2
CY,
ai,
bit
and
Ci,
for i=1,2,
<3>
obtained, from which it can also be calculated the total cost (Cl,
its
(VC/C) ,
and the
inversely
related to the
self-financing
constraint,
3.
Results.
and b,.
situations
whereas
situation
Table 1: Examples 1 to 5
Example 1: al=a2=20,
p = .5
Cl
c2
o!
91
cl2
Pl
p2
'j
'j
rll
Situation
Cl
c2
01
91
q2
Pl
p2
cj
'Ij
rll
~j/Cj
II j/O
Situation
2.2
4.4
3.354
17.59
7.82
2.41
4.36
76.46
0.00
0.14
0.28
0.87
0.00
a,=20,
Situation
2.2
4.4
1.298
27.76
7.79
2.24
4.42
96.64
0.00
0.08
0.28
0.99
-0.04
2
4
10
17.66
7.74
2.34
4.52
76.27
0.00
0.13
0.29
0.96
-0.02
Example 2: a,=30,
p = .5
bl=l, b,=2.
bl=l,
3
Situation
Situation
1
2
43.23
0.5
1
59.846
17.27
8.18
2.73
3.64
76.87
0.00
0.16
0.22
0.44
-0.41
17.13
8.35
2.87
3.31
76.76
0.00
0.17
0.20
0.22
-0.89
b,=2.
Situation
2
4
10
27.69
7.91
2.31
4.18
97.02
0.00
0.08
0.26
0.90
0.00
<6>
Situation
1
2
53.512
27.36
8.49
2.64
3.02
97.85
0.00
0.10
0.18
0.45
-0.83
Situation
751268
27.21
8.76
2.79
2.48
97.63
0.00
0.10
0.14
0.23
-1.83
Table
Example 3: a1=a2=20,
Ip=1
Cl
c2
01
cl1
q2
Pl
p2
cj
'Ij
rll
~'/Cj
nj,b
Cl
c2
a
q1
q2
Pl
p2
5
'Ij
rll
~j/Cj
l-I j/O
(continuation)
b,=l, b,=2.
Situation
Situation
2.2
2.2
4.713
17.62
8.81
2.38
2.38
62.87
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.93
0.00
Example 4: a,=lO,
p=1
a,=15,
Situation
b,=l,
3
Situation
2
2
10
1
1
36.433
17.62
8.81
2.38
2.38
62.87
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.84
0.00
17.62
8.81
2.38
2.38
62.87
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.42
0.00
Situation
0.5
0.5
49.649
17.62
8.81
2.38
2.38
62.87
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.21
0.00
b,=2.
Situation
Situation
2.2
2.2
7.311
2
2
10
1
1
23.447
7.38
6.05
2.62
2.89
36.86
0.00
0.36
0.24
0.80
-0.003
7.42
6.03
2.58
2.94
36.89
0.00
0.35
0.24
0.73
0.00
7.60
5.91
2.40
3.17
36.97
0.00
0.31
0.27
0.37
-0.07
c7>
Situation
0.5
0.5
30.171
7.69
5.89
2.31
3.27
36.95
0.00
0.30
0.28
0. la
-0.16
Table
Example 5: a,=15,
Situation
p=1
b,=l,
3
12.34
3.76
2.66
2.48
42.19
0.00
0.22
0.33
0.84
-0.002
91
cl2
Pl
p2
'j
'j
rll
The
conclusions
following
obtained
(continuation)
b,=2.
Situation
2.2
2.2
6.779
Cl
cz
a
1.
a,=lO,
upon
Situation
2
2
10
1
1
26.107
12.32
3.79
2.68
2.42
42.21
0.00
0.22
0.32
0.76
0.00
12.23
3.93
2.77
2.14
42.27
0.00
0.23
0.27
0.38
-0.06
observation
of
Situation
0.5
0.5
34.161
12.19
3.99
2.81
2.01
42.25
0.00
0.23
0.25
0.19
-0.12
these
examples
are
the
ones:
Different
beliefs
held
by
the
regulator
about
the
composition
of
the observed total cost between fixed and variable cost, being
correct
products,
whenever
about
the
generate
the
relative
different
equilibrium
marginal
price
structures
price-elasticity
of
with
demand
Ramsey
pricing
differs
among
goods.
2 . When
whose
good
the
demand
believed
is
less
fixed
cost
elastic
increases,
the
price
of
the
good
decreases.
<8>
departures
from
pure
Ramsey
pricing,
as
those
instead of a
4. Discussion of Results 1 to 3.
Proof of Result 1.
a+ = b, (al-Pa,)
a b, (aZ-c,)2
Therefore,
different values of c,, which means that PI/P, changes too. This
proves result 1.
Proof of Result 2.
conditions,
Accordingly,
and,
is equivalent
(in this
equivalently,
that PI/P,
increases when c,
(i.e.,
increase,
price-elasticities
-with
if prices
and by construction, if
Co=aj+Clq~+C~q~,
where by
'jvcj/O
taking
is
Note that,
0)
is given by
lc,j-C,")
lip
infinitesimal
(CJ!-qF)
(&-&)I
changes
(denoting
differentials
if and only
dq,/dc,>O and dq,/dc,cO when al>pa2 (case l), dq,/dc,cO and dq,/dc,>O
when a,c/3a,
(case 2),
and dq,/dc2=dq2/dc2=0
that
situation
prevails),
3 is
obtained:
5.
Concluding
Remarks.
conducing
Nevertheless,
First,
(strategic)
Acknowledgments
and
Accounting
Separation,
London.
The Economics of
Regulation, Cambridge,