Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
MARKETING AUDIT:
THE CASE FOR RED BULL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page
and trends, Red Bull has taken measures to ensure the general public that
drinking their product is safe and not harmful for human health. This campaign
was launched specifically in their website2 and various marketing efforts
through the television3 and print media4, coupled with sports and arts
sponsorships5 globally. Their youth-centered marketing efforts have led the
business to concentrate on clubs and bars of the countries in where they
market their product, in addition to the already stated tactics of common
marketing media, although not so visible on the latter tactics.
B. Economic
The general picture of the world economy shows positive growth, in
terms of global output (up by 5 in 2006 and 4.4% in 2005 6) and dominated by
technologically and health-driven industries (CIA World Factbook 2007).
However, in the developing economies where Red Bull targeted to expand its
business operations, the income level over the last five decades has failed to
grow causing an increase in an already high world inequality (World
Economic and Social Survey 2007). Price ranges for the energy drink, on the
other hand, remains stabilized due to the sustained patronization for said
beverage product by the market. In line with such changes, Red Bull
recognized the tendency of people to cut back on energy drink consumption
and focus on more basic needs. Thus, their marketing strategy of giving away
free Red Bull products to the markets where they are most profitable 7,
2
Accessed at http://www.redbull.com/#page=ProductPage.Ingredients
See for example: http://www.tellyads.com/show_movie.php?
filename=TA2610&advertiser=Red%20Bull%60
4
See for example: http://206.145.80.239/zbc/showthread.php?t=011789
5
For more details, access http://sil.mcmaster.ca/Archive/life/041111lifetrend.html
6
From https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html#Econ
7
http://www.psychotactics.com/artnature.htm
3
particularly students and employees who work at night and need the
necessary energy that Red Bull professes to offer may work in enticing people
to buy their power drinks.
C. Environmental
Various environmental issues have bombarded contemporary business
organizations and Red Bull is no exception to the rule. Brennan (2006) stated
that the energy consumed by the beverage industry in most countries, as well
as the food industry, is a significant portion of the total energy used in
manufacturing industry. Likewise, Hillary (200) noted that said industries are
major producers of carbon dioxide.
Since Red Bull is a privately held company, it is not very much subject
to public scrutiny regarding environmental issues, unlike counterparts in the
beverage industry like Coca-Cola and Pepsi who are publicly held. There is
little or no news on the web regarding environmental issues involving the
energy drink world leader, which may mean two things: that it complies with
global standards for environmental care or issues about it has not received
much publicity.
The firms product is mainly filled and sold in aluminum cans and
smaller share of Red Bull is marketed in single-use glass bottles. As a result,
waste management is a big issue for the leading energy drink manufacturer.
Fulfillment of a part of the companys corporate social responsibility to the
environment is one of the main expectations of shareholders and Red Bull, as
an element of their unique marketing strategies, have set forth ways to
minimize waste and protect the environment by way of appropriate and sound
waste management initiatives. In line with this vision in mind, the company
sough new technologies that can eliminate, if not totally mitigate, the negative
impact of the companys production and business operation to the
environment and the community (Red Bull National Packing Covenant 2005).
In concrete terms, this has been established by the use of thinner,
substantially reducing the amount of aluminum it used (Red Bull National
Packing Covenant 2005).
D. Technological
One of the main challenges facing the energy drink industry is not only
the need to deliver optimum volume growth and adapt to changing consumer
demands but also to stimulate demand itself through greater product
innovation. This is particularly relevant for Red Bull who has been observed to
have failed in diversifying into other product lines, much less a Red Bull
energy drink variant. Innovation, whether in terms of packaging or product
formulation, has been widespread in the beverage industry over the last few
years. Ashurst (2005) asserted that innovative premium priced energy drinks
have witnessed rapid growth in the mature soft drinks markets of Western
Europe and North America and are also generating substantial gains in the
developing world. Hence, it is proven that innovation could help maintain
momentum for the sector.
The more complex drinks formulations like that of the Red Bull brand
can pose significant analytical challenge for process management (Stratford,
Hofman & Cole 2000). Thirty years ago, there would have been a limited set
of equipment in the quality control laboratory for the majority of beverage
factories. However, with the move to larger and more efficient factories with
faster bottling lines, it has become critical to ensure that bottling formulation
is correct before the product is packed (Ashurst 2005).
Red Bull, in their attempt to answer to environmental issues while at
the same time reducing company costs, have undertaken research and
development to improve on their product over the years. Dietrich Mateschitz,
founder of the Red Bull company, looked for a manufacturer who can deliver
the quality that his product needs to be able to differentiate itself from other
energy drink products in the market. The Red Bell father also stressed the
focus on lowering aluminium content in their cans. There is currently no
generic energy drink substitute to replace can best rival, more so supersede,
the Red Bull product, which is why sustained profitability is still feasible.
However, there is no room to relax as competitors are always there
aggressively eating away the companys market leadership.
E. Political
In response to the push for a more health-driven society, the
government has begun inspecting the industry starting late 2006 (Kerley
2006). Rosenbloom, Silink & Kida (2003) pointed out that the banning of soft
drink products like Red Bull from schools in several county school districts in
the USA is an important beginning for decreasing the incidence of Type 2
diabetes among children and teenagers. This is bad news for the energy drink
industry in general, not only for Red Bull, because this means decreased
sales in the areas where such regulations are being implemented. And the
problem is that the United States is not the only country to take such actions.
Also late last year, the worlds first agreement to prohibit direct selling
of full-sugar energy drinks like Red Bull in New Zealand schools have been
signed (World First Agreement on Soft Drinks in Schools 2006). Likewise,
stricter pollution laws, amended equal employment opportunity laws, sterner
price control watch, modified product safety and advertising regulations have
resulted to Red Bull drastically changing their marketing strategies. Most
prominent of this is their introduction of a sugar-free variant of their product in
the market in order to counteract the negative effect on sales with the banning
of full sugar energy drinks on institutions of learning in several countries. Also,
a product safety measure is making Red Bull cans thinner so that there is less
aluminum content in such package, making it more environmental-friendly.
F. Cultural
General public attitude towards the Red Bull product is acceptance and
patronization, although a number of health-conscious groups have started to
campaign on some of the bad effects of the energy drink on human health.
Much of these criticisms to Red Bull, however, do not state that company is
damaging to human health in itself. The product is popular among the clubhopping and athletic youth in Europe and the United States because of its
successful creative approaches to delivering its overall marketing efforts
conveyed through a set of initiatives which are culturally and sports-inclined.
Among these are the Red Bull Music Academy, the Red Bull Acro team, the
Red Bull Yamaha and Junior Teams and the Red Bull Barako Philippine
basketball team (Schmitt 2003).
10
Task Environment
A. Markets
Smith, Gupta & Gupta (2006) observed that the major market
segments that Red Bull is catering to are: (1) male teenagers; (2) people in
their 20s; (3) extreme-sports enthusiasts; (4) video-game players; (5)
basketball fans; and (6) hip-hop fans. From the above enumeration, it could
be said that the market segments that Red Bull is targeting is a very young
and outgoing group of consumers, which makes it more difficult for the
company to market their product. The male teenagers who form part of their
market will not be male teenagers for long, they will soon grow up and move
to the early twenties segment of the market, which, fortunately, still belongs to
the market captured by Red Bull. Even though these teenagers and early
twenty consumers may grow up to become adults, Red Bull will not find
scarcity in the said segment, as the continuous growth of the world population
is a source of steady sales for the energy drink producer. These two market
segments are distributed normally in the places where Red Bull sells their
product, so geographical distribution is more or less a controlled factor.
Extreme sports enthusiasts, on the other hand, are geographically
dispersed, and have observed concentration only in developed and some
developing countries where the locations are conducive to extreme sports
activities. Their ages range from early twenties to late forties at the most, and
whose segment size is steadily growing, given the tendency of people
nowadays to look for adventurous and exciting ways to chill out. Video-game
players, as prompted by societys addiction to technology, are likewise a
market segment that patronizes Red Bull, with the latters claim to improve
11
reaction times and assist in keeping people up and about for long-standing
periods of time. Obviously, these are what video game addicts need and the
said marketing ploy of the Red Bull firm seem to be working with this
particular market sector.
Basketball fans, on the other hand, are drawn by Red Bulls marketing
strategy with its promises of boosting energy needed to play the exhausting
game. As evidenced in the Philippine scene, the Red Bull Barako team being
one of the strongest basketball teams in the country, and aside from the fact
that basketball is the most-loved and most-watched sport in the islands, the
product is getting really impressive and extensive marketing exposure. This
scenario brings to mind the equally popular Gatorade, whose sponsorship as
the National Basketball Associations (NBA) official sports drink has gained
the PepsiCo product unequalled media coverage.
Lastly, hip-hop fans as a sizeable segment of the Red Bull market has
been brought up by the entry of Pit Bull Energy drink in the market in
November of 2000 (McKenna 2004). Due to the fact that the latter product has
gained considerable market share in the hip hop segment which Red Bull has
neglected until Pit Bulls emergence, the company under analysis significantly
made changes in their marketing efforts to include said segment as part of
their target markets. The Red Bull Music Academy, as part of Red Bulls effort
to capture the hip-hop people, caters largely to hip-hop fans around the globe.
B. Customers
The goal of all businesses, not only those engaged in the energy drink
industry, is to generate revenues and ensure the growth of their enterprises.
12
Salespeople understand that there are distinct phases of the customer buying
process, no matter what market segment they may belong. The key,
according to Rosen (2002), is, therefore, providing the information that
customers need to move through each phase of the process so that they
arrive at the decision to make a purchase. These includes: (1) Need
identification; (2) Research; (3) Product Selection; (4) Product Purchase; and
(5) Post Purchase Behavior.
The need identification phase is when a real or apparent need triggers
or inspires someone to be interested in the product (Jacobs & Stone 2001).
The second phase is research wherein alternative solutions are looked for by
the consumer, which could be as simple as reading a label on a product seen
at a grocery store or as complex as hiring a firm to research the issues and
perform an analysis (Sandhusen 2000). The third phase, which is product
selection, involves the consumer choosing on which of the available
alternatives to purchase, which leads to the next buying phase- the actual
purchase of the product (Hisrich 2000). Baker (2001) explained that the last
stage of the buying process, which is post purchase behavior, is mainly dealt
with for purposes of customer retention and gaining their loyalty.
Customers and potential buyers of Red Bull rate the energy drink
industry players based on a number of combined factors: (1) personal
experience; (2) media exposure; (3) market following; (4) immediate
availability in the market; and (5) price range relative to quality (Shachman
2005). Although different market segments follow the same buying process
when deciding to patronize an energy drink, they have different needs that
they want to be individually addressed by the energy drink provider. For
13
instance, sports people want the beverage for the second wind that it could
give them, while male teenagers purchase it to be in.
The exponential growth of Red Bull came about not only because of
the unusual ingredients of the drink, but because of focused experiential
platform. Red Bulls experiential positioning is energy in a bottle; its EVP is
strengthening the heart, accelerating the metabolism and fighting stress
(Schmitt 2003). The implementation theme of their marketing efforts is
centered on staying fit for all sorts of social fun activities. For the clubbing
crowd worldwide, drinking Red Bull is like injecting a dose of energy and
stamina that helps them move faster and faster to the escalating beats of
electronic and trance music.
C. Competitors8
The energy drink industry is not dominated by large drink companies,
as witnessed in the soft drink industry, but instead characterized by stiff
competition among a continuously increasing number of smaller companies,
all catering to a very select consumer base (Smith, Gupta & Gupta 2006).
Still, major soft drink companies like PepsiCo and Coca-Cola was not stopped
at producing energy drinks of their own- SoBE Adrenaline Rush and AMP
Energy Drink for PepsiCo and Full Throttle for Coke. An energy drink beer for
Budweiser, called Budweiser B^E (Bud Energy) has also recently started to be
carried by sports bars (Shachman 2005).
Following are some of the better known rivals of Red Bull in the
industry (Red Bull GmbH 2007), coupled with brief descriptions of their
8
Competitor information is from their respective websites and various company researches
done on said firms.
14
strategies, strengths (ST), weaknesses (W) and size 9 (S): (1) Lipovitan. ST:
predates Red Bull in the energy drink industry and a major force in Japan. W:
heavily dependent in the Japanese market and inadequate brand strategy. S:
Taisho Pharmaceutical, which is the producer of Lipovitan, has sales of $2.3
billion in 2006 and has 5,191 as of last year; (2) Rockstar. ST: Edgy
advertising campaigns and has a variety of product offerings W: Not very
effective management and features of popular personalities as marketing
tactic is not gaining much exposure as originally expected;
(3) Go Fast! ST: They have other product offerings aside from their
energy drink and their sports orientation is strong. W: Not enough experience
in the industry; (4) Anheuser-Buschs 180. ST: They are prominent in the
United States. W: Their focus is not mainly on energy drink production S:
They currently have 12 breweries in the US; (5) Hansens Red and Monster
Energy Drink. ST: Edgy Packaging and strong sports sponsorship. W: Their
focus is not mainly on energy drink production. S: 290 employees with 348.9
million in 2005 revenues; (6) Chronic 187. ST: Hip-hop concentrated segment
market. W: Not much taste differentiation.
Red Bull genuinely defined and, then, seized the market. As a result,
the company continues to hold the surging and clear advantage. It knows that
the first mover edge is formidable, particularly when it is driven by real
experiences of people identifying with tangible results from the product. Red
Bull has resisted rolling out additional products in ancillary markets such as
apparel and the like, choosing to remain steadfast with one product. The only
exception to this is Red Bulls sugar-free, low-carb version, a smart move, in
If information is available.
15
light of the Atkins craze, which shows no sign of abating (Miller & Morey
2004).
To this end, the future trends of the energy drink market will more
probably be initiated by Red Bull, as it has done so many times in the past.
The shift to a substitute product other than energy drinks is not an immediate
threat, as driven by the apparent lack of innovation anywhere near the
industry.
16
educate consumers about the product (Lamb, McDaniel & Hair 2005). Overall,
this is what was known in business jargon as grassroots marketing 10.
The ability of the Red Bull brand to reach customers in their natural or
everyday environment has very bright future potentials. Since the brand has
more opportunity to offer a more personal interaction with the prospective
customer, customers will be more comfortable with the product and the brand
will have enhanced chances of grabbing more market share.
E. Suppliers
Caffeine and taurine are two of the most controversial ingredients of
the Red Bull energy drink, aside from glucuronolactone, sucrose, glucose,
acesulfame K, aspartame/sucralose and B-Group vitamins 11, all of which are
synthetically produced by pharmaceutical companies. With the power of
science as a potent tool, chemical compounds that form the basic ingredients
of the energy drink under analysis can be very expensive but more profitable
for the company who utilizes it. The pharmaceutical industry is forecasted to
experience an increased number of developments, through integration of
activities at various phases, laboratory automation for method development
and more effective experimental designs (Hara 2003). Thus, the stability of
supply for the Red Bull firm can be guaranteed in the years to come, with
production processes for such synthetically produced ingredients becoming
more and more cost effective, efficient and environmentally friendly.
10
Siegel, Coffey & Livingston (2004:167) defined the term as the catchall term that describes
methods and communication channels that fall outside traditional channels of paid
advertising, public relations or publicity and promotion.
11
http://www.redbull.com/#page=ProductPage.Ingredients
17
G. Publics
The sports sector and the medical profession present opportunities and
problems for the company, respectively. In the sports sector, because in an
increasingly health-conscious world where people are becoming sportsoriented, Red Bull stands better chances of sustaining market leadership with
this particular market segment. The medical profession has been questioning
the alleged benefits of Red Bull to its drinkers from day one, and they show
no signs of tapering off in the near future.
As for the sports sector, Red Bull has already started marketing their
products to them through a bevy of sports sponsorships. Red Bull is wellknown to sponsor events such as the Formula One racing, extreme sports,
snowboarding, basketball and motocross and has successfully become the
drink of choice for extreme sports fanatics. The medical profession has been
dealt with by Red Bull through a number of grassroots campaign which
educates people about the ingredients of the energy drink and busts myths
18
about their taurine content being from bulls testicles and Red Bull causing
death if taken with alcohol.
19
marketing the product worldwide are by far very successful and, at the same
time, highly talked about.
Taking from their current marketing activities, implied marketing
objective would be to reach all possible market segments with the use of the
least resources, thus the grassroots marketing approach. Given the
companys current position in the industry, their vast resources, marketing
ingenuity and the opportunities that lay ahead of them coming from the widely
untapped markets of the rest of the world yet unconquered (Japan being the
foremost target), their marketing goals and objectives of Red Bull GmbH are
seemingly quite appropriate.
C. Strategy
The low-key grassroots marketing strategy of Red Bull is evidently wellarticulated for its marketing team, resulting to success in their marketing
efforts. Their spot-on approach, wherein the products are distributed to the
places where the target market frequently hangs out (for example, gas
stations in Europe and clubs in the United States), catered first to a speciallytargeted niche market group rather than starting its brand life within a
community. Since the success of the strategy, they had correctly relied on it to
drive the products success.
Instead of depending on the traditional channels of TV and print media,
Red Bull chose to diversify its message and use direct marketing as its major
tool. This enabled the firm to constantly alter the message to fit the type of
audience with whom they were communicating (Seybold & Lindstrom 2004).
Their strategy is appropriate given that their core market are teens, who would
20
obviously not be teens forever, so this ability to constantly alter their message
depending on the generation that they are dealing with is fitting for the energy
drink brand.
B. Functional Efficiency
Communications and working relations within the Red Bull firm has so
far not been subject to media scrutiny, which potentially spells good
communications and working relations within the business organization. It is
clear in the Red Bulls case that the role of their brand manager which must
21
interact very closely with many of the other organizations functions is being
done accordingly. Sensitivity to the hazards of interfering with the functional
efficiency of other departments is no substitute for formal systems to ensure
that the brand management function does not play havoc with existing control
and reporting systems though.
So Red Bull, even though they are an exemplary model of excellent
marketing, must still observe that a number of areas are especially vulnerable
to the enthusiasm of determined brand managers like what the company has
at present. The managers of Red Bull are, in the meantime, planning sales
volume, not profits, showing that they are striving for market leadership, and
not solely profit-oriented (Miller & Morey 2004). Emphasis on functional
efficiency should not make cross-functional collaborations difficult. But, it
should instigate a smooth flow of communication and working relations
between Red Bulls departments around the world.
C. Interface Efficiency
Currently, there are no problems and threats that present themselves in
the way of Red Bulls continued success in the global market. There is general
consensus between marketing, manufacturing, research and development,
purchasing, finance, accounting and the legal departments of the company
that they can continue leading the energy drink category by employing the
same techniques that put them on the map in the first place (Lamb, McDaniel
& Hair 2005).
Sales results have been incredible. In a new market, Red Bull generally
breaks even within the first three months and shows a profit after six months
22
(Helm 2005). Sales team, together with marketing people, visit targeted onsite accounts like trendy nightclubs, bars, gas stations, colleges, gyms,
health-food stores and supermarkets and supplies them with a branded cooler
and other point-of-purchase items after an initial purchase of a few cases of
the said establishments.
23
24
manufacturer has indeed become a modern applied science. They know and
apply it well, while it seems that other firms in the industry hardly realize it has
arrived on the scene. An approach to marketing that includes the whole
marketing channel is, therefore, the ultimate consideration, a lesson which
should be learned by not only rivals in the energy drink industry but other
players in other industries as well. The success of Red Bulls marketing
planning system was dependent on information gathering and analysis. The
employment of information and communication technology innovations are
essential aids in this campaign.
25
26
27
AMP Energy Drink (Amp Energy Drink n.d). It is the companys maiden
venture into the energy drink arena. Evidently, AMPs raison d etre is to
capitalize on Mountain Dews established image. The concept would be to
introduce something new, yet very familiar (Amp Energy Drink n.d).
Despite of such threat, Red Bull has not lost its grip in its most precious
territories. In the United States its market share garnered a total of 40%
(Dolan 2005). In UAE, many of its consumers remained loyal to the brand. By
virtue of religious mantras, in which alcohol is strictly prohibited, energy drinks
have found their special place in the heart of the said region (Goldie 2005).
While everything seems to operate smoothly, apparently, the abovementioned calls for a repositioning of the product. There is no doubt that Red
Bull has fully gained its edge when it comes to market distribution. But then
again, it would be better if the image it projects would go beyond being a
sports enthusiast. Continuous response to market changes and anticipation of
trends is, thus, a must.
B. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
In order to gain more exposure, Red Bull has readily sponsored and
organized extreme sports events (Dolan 2005). The reason behind this is to
promote that Red Bull is really the kind of drink that has the kick in it.
However, the company does not seem to be content with sponsoring sportsrelated activities alone. Recently, it also ventured into buying sports team. The
New York Metro Stars was purchased by Red Bull founder Mr. Mateschitz (Ho
2006). The team soon changed its name to Red Bull. Mateschitz disclosed
that he has been spending around $300 million in sponsorships alone (Ho
28
29
(Claycamp & Wind 1976). In addition, the objectives surrounding the product
line of the company should be analyzed. The design of product lines is a
problem faced by companies that are trying to introduce a product to both new
and existing markets, as well as by companies that seek to diversify their
product lines. Yet, the product should correspond to what the customers want
(Dobson & Kalish 1988).
It has been established that Red Bull caters to a select market of male
teenagers and young people in their 20s. Red Bull has effectively reached to
this segment of the market through its various advertising campaigns,
featuring extreme sports. However, it appears that there is a need to expand
its product line to develop a product that will cater more to female young
people. Although the development of Red Bull sugar free has, in part,
addressed this concern; there is still an evident need to develop a similar
product that will cater more specifically to the female segment of the market.
This will also have a significant impact on the marketing campaigns of Red
Bull as it would have to feature females who are engaged in active lifestyle
and personally use the product. Offering different versions of the energy drink
can attract various segments of the markets, effectively making Red Bull the
market leader in most segments of the market.
B. Price
The concern of major companies is profitability, which can be
accomplished through the reduction of costs in producing the product and
setting the price such that returns are maximized. However, the traditional
economic theory of price is not always what motivates managers to set the
30
31
32
33
E. Sales Force
From being seen as a market-less product, Red Bull managed to sell
more than one million cans in 1997. By 1998, this number has grown to 300
million cans. The company has reported a sales record of US$1 Billion (Sauer
2001). By 2004, the number of cans sold has increased to 1.9 billion and the
profits reached US$2 Billion (Dolan 2005). When the company was just
starting under the leadership of Mateschitz, there was only one secretary and
six persons who made up its sales force (Dolan 2005). Because of its
marketing strategies, however, the sales force has grown dramatically. The
companys use of guerrilla marketing and direct distribution was so effective
that Red Bull was able to create its own market, despite of the earlier
research that it virtually did not have a market at the onset (Dolan 2005). Its
sales force consists of agents and dealers who coordinate with retail outfits.
There are also those who distribute the product directly to consumers
especially if there are sporting and other events sponsored by Red Bull. Red
Bull has also penetrated a great number of countries in the world today and
has setup its sales force in those countries. The rise of Red Bulls sales and
34
35
REFERENCES
AMP Energy Drink n.d, Bevnet, accessed May 24, 2007, from
<http://www.bevnet.com/reviews/amp/>.
Ashurst, P 2005, Chemistry and Technology of Soft Drinks and Fruit Juices,
Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford.
Baker, M 2001, Marketing: Critical Perspectives on Business and
Management, Routledge, London.
Brennan, J 2006, Food Processing Handbook, Wiley, Germany.
CIA World Factbook, accessed May 23, 2007, from
<https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-worldfactbook/geos/xx.html#Econ>.
Clark, K & Fujimoto, T 1990, The Power of Product Integrity, Harvard
Business Review, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 107-118.
Claycamp, H & Wind, Y 1976, Product Line Strategy: A Matrix Approach,
Journal of Marketing, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 2-9.
Cohen, E 2001, Energy Drinks Pack a Punch, but is it too Much?, CNN
website, accessed May 23, 2007, from
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/diet.fitness/05/29/energy.drinks.
02/>.
Crouch, S & Housden, M 2003, Marketing Research for Managers,
Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
Dobson, G & Kalish, S 1988, Positioning and Pricing a Product Line,
Marketing Science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 107-125.
Dolan, K 2005, The Soda with a Buzz, Forbes.com, accessed May 24, 2007,
from <http://www.forbes.com/global/2005/0328/028_print.html>.
36
Grand Prix.com 2007, Red Bull Buys Into Soccer, accessed May 24, 2007,
from <http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns14574.html>.
Goldie, L 2005, Energising the UAE: The Consumption of Alcohol Is Haram,
Forbidden, for Muslims. in the United Arab Emirates High Energy
Drinks Have Soared in Popularity to Become a Fashionable Part of the
Emirates' Culture, The Middle East, vol. 362, pp. 62.
Hands, D, Ingram, J & Jerrard, R 2002, Design Management Case Studies,
Routledge, London.
Hara, T 2003, Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Edward Elgar
Publishing Limited, Cheltenham.
Helm, B 2005, The Sport of Extreme Marketing, Business Week website,
accessed May 23, 2007, from
<http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_11/c3924015_m
z003.htm>.
Hisrich, R 2000, Marketing, Barrons Educational Series, Inc. New York.
Ho, M 2006, For Red Bull, Its Here, There and Everywhere. Washington Post,
accessed May 24, 2007, from <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2006/08/22/AR2006082201516.html>.
Jacobs, R & Stone, B 2001, Successful Direct Marketing Methods, McGrawHill, New York.
Kaihara, T 2001, Supply Chain Management with Market Economics,
International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 73, pp. 5-14.
Kerley, D 2006, Extreme Energy Drinks get Government Inspection, ABC
News website, accessed May 23, 2007, from
<http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=2622310>.
37
Laing, I 2005, Energy Drink Firm Has US Market in the Can, The Journal, vol.
26, September issue.
Lamb, C, McDaniel, C & Hair, J 2005, Essentials of Marketing, Thomson
South-Western, Ohio.
McKenna, J 2004, Keepin it Raw: Hip Hop and Celebrity Energy Drinks,
BevNET.com website, accessed May 23, 2007, from
<http://www.bevnet.com/news/2004/05-27-2004-keepin_it_raw.asp>.
Miller, S & Morey, D 2004, The Underdog Advantage, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Monroe, K & Dela Bitta, A 1978, Models for Pricing Decisions, Journal of
Marketing Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 413-428.
Red Bull Advertisement 2007, No Red Bull, No Wings, accessed May 24,
2007, from <http://www.tellyads.com/show_movie.php?
filename=TA2610&advertiser=Red%20Bull%60>.
Red Bull Air Race 2007, You Tube.com, accessed May 24, 2007, from
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_e-VGidxLA>.
Red Bull BC One 2005 Trailer 2005, You Tube.com, accessed May 24, 2007,
from <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZhOGmgDQDo>.
Red Bull GmbH 2007, Hoovers Inc. website, accessed May 23, 2007, from
<http://www.hoovers.com/red-bull/--ID__101316--/free-cofactsheet.xhtml>.
Red Bull National Packing Covenant 2005, The Packaging Council Of
Australia, Inc. website, accessed May 23, 2007, from
<http://www.packcoun.com.au/ActionPlans/ap_RedBull_Y1RY2P.pdf>.
Red Bull website 2007, accessed May 23, 2007, from
<http://www.redbull.com>.
38
39