Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PARENTHOOD
Topic: How life is like for women in Texas after the defunding of Planned Parenthood
General Purpose: To inform
Specific Purpose: To inform my audience of the defunding of planned parenthood
in Texas
Thesis: Texas started the legislation to defund planned parenthood, the way
contraception has changed, and the quality of care.
1. Several states have tried to defund Planned Parenthood, for one reason or
another. Mainly the reason is because the governments do not agree with
abortion. And since a woman can go to Planned Parenthood for an abortion
they want to get rid of it.
a. Each year, Planned Parenthoodreceives some 9,000 birth control
visits, and conducts approximately 3,000 pap tests, 3,000 breast
exams and 18,000 STD tests (Ziegler, Mary 2012, Sexing Harris: The
Law and Politics of the Movement to Defund Planned Parenthood)
b. As that quote states, it does more in a community other than just
abortions.
c. Most of their services are free, or close to free.
d. There are 10 states so far that have made moves to defund planned
parenthood, Texas being one of them, another being Wisconsin, and
Florida just to name a few.
2. The start of Texas defunding planned parenthood
a. 2007
i. Texas operated a Medicaid waiver program, the Womens
Health Program, with 90% of funding from the federal
government (Stevenson, Amanda 2016, Effect of Removal of
Planned Parenthood from the Texas Womens Health Program).
b. 2011
i. Texas legislature directed the program to exclude planned
parenthood affiliates (Stevenson, Amanda 2016, Effect of
Removal of Planned Parenthood from the Texas Womens Health
Program).
ii. According to, Stevenson the Medicaid and Medicare federal
centers told Texas that by excluding medically qualified
providers violates federal law, so they would not renew the
waiver but they would continue transitioning the funding
through the end of 2012.
iii. Texas then replaced the federally funded program with a nearly
identical 100% state-funded program (the Texas Womens
Health Program) that excluded clinics affiliated with an abortion
provider (Stevenson, Amanda, 2016 Effect of Removal of
Planned Parenthood from the Texas Womens Health Program
2
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Reference Page
Annes, George and Mariner, Wendy 2011; Women and Children Last
The Predictable Effects of Proposed Federal Funding Cuts Retrieved
from http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmp1102915#t=article
Junda Woo, C, Alamgir, Hasanat, Potter, Joseph April 2016; Womens
Experiences after Planned Parenthoods exclusion from a family
planning program in Texas Volume 93 Issue 4 Pages 298-302 Retrieved
from
http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.emich.edu/science/article/pii/S0
01078241530038X
Stevenson, Amanda; Flores-Vazquez, Imelda; Allgeyer, Richard;
Schenkkan, Pete; Potter, Joseph March 2016; Effect of Removal of
Planned Parenthood from the Texas Womens Health Program
Retrieved from
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1511902#t=articleTop
Ziegler, Mary; 2012 Sexing Harris: The Law and Politics of the
Movement to Defund Planned Parenthood 60 Buff. L. Rev. 701
Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?
handle=hein.journals/buflr60&div=21&id=&page=
White, Kari; Grossman, Daniel; Hopkins, Kristine; Potter, Joseph
September 2012; Cutting Family Planning in Texas Retrieved from
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1207920#t=article