Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Final Paper
Martino Sciarra
Andy Chou
Introduction
The word liminality was first coined by the French Antropologist Arnold Van
Gennepp in 1956 to indicate the quality of ambiguity or disorientation that
occurs in the middle stage of rituals. Since the concept of liminality was
introduced, the word found application not only in religious terms but also in
many other fields, one of which is Architecture. In this paper we would like to
analyze how an abandoned space can respond to the concept of liminality, in
particular how the threefold phases elaborated by Van Gennepp in his book
Rites of passages fits perfectly the condition of an abandoned space.
Before entering our analysis, it is necessary to present the definition of
Liminarity by Arnold Von Gennep, and what the tree phases are consisted of.
In the book Rites of Passages published in 1906, Von Gennepp anylize the
ambiguity in context of rituals in small scale societies. He introduced a threefold structure: preliminal rites (or rites of separation), liminal rites (or transition
rites) and postliminal rites (or rites of incorporation). Actually Van Gennepp
found that this three-stages structure could be applied to all rituals, no matter
religion or country. Liminality means something in between, a transition period
where no rules or definition can be applied. Von Gennepp also divided the
rituals in rites of initation, the one that mark the passage of an individual or
social group to form one status to another and those which mark transitions in
the passage of times , like new year or harvesting rituals.
Van Gennepp found that the rites of initiations responded better to this threefolded pattern. In many religion, the rite of initiation is usually performed when
a boy who changes his status from a youngster into adulthood; a separation
from his family (rite of separation) that involves his death as a child. A second
stage called (rite of initiation) the new initiant must proove his adulthood
through a test and the third state (rite of incorporation) that imply a celebration
of the new birth of the adult that is accepted back in the society as a new
man.
lost its purpose as an apartment building when the residents moved out.
Intregingly since the area was not closed to the public, people started utilizing
the apartment as a part of their daily lives. The common garden located inside
the complex served as a public-like space where people dined, socialized,
and relaxed during their leisure. Such formation of private-public space may
be refered to the postliminal rites, in which it created a harmonious interaction
between a privately owned space and the people using the abandoned space.
The concept of liminality took over the apartment complex to incorporate both
the private aspect and the public aspect of this abaondoned space. The
dissolution of order during liminality creates a fluid, malleable situation that
enables new institutions and customs to become established, and it has
overtaken the abandoned architecture of Toei Kasumigaoka Apartment
Complex to form a community which allows private and public to coexist.
As Karin Jashke wrote in his chapter City is House and House is City: Aldo
Van Eyck, Piet Blom and the Architecture of Homecoming, Van Eycks ideas
about structural ordering principles were influenced in particular by Martin
Bubers theory of In-Berween and Turner analysis of Van gennepp Liminality
that conceived of society as a structural entity.
Van Eyck continued his research on interrelations between human life and
architecture, which led him to develop and introduce his concept of liminality
in the architectural praxis; he suggest that a transitional space or threshold
must involve the correlation of the two phenomenon rather their opposition. In
this way the hybrid and mixed nature of liminal spaces is defined. In the same
way we can apply this concept of coexistence at our abandoned space.
Conclusion
The Stalker Collective
References
Heidegger, Martin. 1997. Art and Space. In Rethinking Architecture, ed. Neil
Leach, trans. Charles Siebert. London: Routledge: 121-124.
van Eyck, Aldo. 1968. Doorstep. In team 10 primer, ed. Alison Smithson.
London: Studio Vista: 96-104
van Gennep, Arnold. 1960. The Rites of Passage, trans. Monika B. Vizedom
and Gabrielle L. Caffe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Vattimo, Gianni. 1997a. The End of Modernity, The End of the Project? In
Rethinking Architecture, ed. Neil Leach, trans. David Webb. London:
Routledge
Hazel AndrewsLes Roberts. 2012. Liminal Landscapes: Travel, Experience
and Spaces In-between
Jaschke, K. (2008). City is House and House is City: Aldo van Eyck, Piet
Blom and Architecture of Homecoming. In Di Palma (Ed.) Intimate Metropolis:
Urban Subjects in the Modern City (pp.175-194). Routledge.
Van Eyck, A. (1959). The Story of Another Thought. In Forum 7. Amsterdam
and Hilversum.
Turner, Victor. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Koolhaas, Rem, and B. Mau. 1997. What ever happened to urbanism? In R.
Koolhaas, and B. Mau (eds.), S, M, L, XL: 959-971. Rotterdam: 010
Publishers
Jaschke, Karin. 2010. City is House and House is City: Aldo Van Eyck, Piet
Blom and the Architecture of Homecoming. In Intimate Metropolis, Urban
Subjects in the Modern City, London: Routledge