Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1 of 3
http://www.bmj.com/content/322/7279/130.3?page=1&tab=responses
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here
BMJ
News
Date published
Descending
14/03/2013 14:37
2 of 3
http://www.bmj.com/content/322/7279/130.3?page=1&tab=responses
21 January 2001
Although the BMJ asks AUTHORS "to declare any competing interests," the article "Finnish study confirms safety of MMR vaccine"
does not appear to mention or find significance in the fact that this study was apparently commissioned by and paid for by MERCK
who has a compelling interest in the outcome of any such research!
It would seem that since there are huge financial stakes involved in current and probable future litigation that this might raise some
questions about the validity of such a pharmaceutically sponsored study. In recent years there have been a number of similar
pharmaceutically supported studies found to be either biased or fraudulent. Don't your readers have a right to know of this
possibility?
I have absolutely no competing interests.
Thomas L. Stone, M.D.
Competing interests: None declared
Thomas L Stone
Private Practice, Kempton, Illinois, USA
Click to like:
0
+
BMJ Group
14/03/2013 14:37
3 of 3
http://www.bmj.com/content/322/7279/130.3?page=1&tab=responses
AVERTISSEMENT DE SCURIT :
traitez lURL ci-dessous comme un mot
de passe et ne la partagez avec personne.
14/03/2013 14:37