Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PART II
TABLE of CONTENTS
INTRO
ABOUT THE WORLD PHOTOGRAPHY ORGANISATION AND THE SONY WORLD PHOTOGRAPHY AWARDS
10
11
PART III
PART IV
Russ OConnell: #SWPA Competition Judge & Picture Editor for The Sunday Times Magazine (UK)
Damien Demolder: #SWPA Open & Youth Competition Judge, Photographer and Journalist (UK)
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
CONCLUSION
SPECIAL OFFER
CONTESTS17
Questions? Contact us anytime at
212-206-0808 or support@photoshelter.com.
Offer valid for new PhotoShelter users. Get 20% off a monthly Standard account
for the first year only.
33
David Chancellor, UK, 2nd Place, Professional, Campaign, 2016 Sony World Photography Awards
2017
Call
For
Entries
Prizes include
Deadlines
PART I
Intro
hoto contests serve many different purposes for photographers. For some, contests can offer a simple way to judge yourself against others while providing varying levels
of critical feedback. For others, contests can offer
significant marketing exposure and monetary prizes
and equipment. But all contests arent necessarily
worth your while. Unscrupulous contest promoters
can demand overreaching rights grabs and require
high entry fees. Many contests are simply cash making scams that appeal to the ego of the unwitting
photographer. This guide, in partnership with the
World Photography Organisation, is designed to
help you separate the wheat from the chaff.
Weve compiled a list of forty-two photo contests
and rendered a verdict. Recommended contests are
indicated by the
icon. Our subjective analysis is
based on five criteria:
Entry fees:
Prizes:
tests that have multiple prizes for different categories or top finishers. We abhor contests that have
entry fees, but only award certificates to the winners.
Submission rights:
I
II
III
IV
like the Audubon allow entrants to opt-out of this type of usage). This allows
contests to build and show a steady stream of content throughout the course of
the application and judging periods.
Of course, the more an image is displayed online, the greater the chances for it
to be stolen. But the approach to showing curated entries is becoming more of a
norm particularly in contests geared more towards non-professionals.
An example of bad photographer rights from Smithsonian Photo Contest (we
bolded egregious sections). We dont like this language because it allows Smithsonian to use your image on materials that have nothing to do with the competition (e.g. calendars, books, subscription cards, etc):
You retain your rights to your photograph; however, by entering the
contest, you grant the Smithsonian Institution (and those authorized
by the Smithsonian) a royalty-free, world-wide, perpetual, non-exclusive license to publicly display, distribute, reproduce and create derivative works of the entries, in whole or in part, in any media now existing
or later developed, for any Smithsonian Institution purpose, including,
but not limited to, advertising and promotion of the magazine and its
website, exhibition, and commercial products, including but not limited to Smithsonian Institution publications. Any photograph reproduced will include a photographer credit as feasible. The Smithsonian
Institution will not be required to pay any additional consideration or
seek any additional approval in connection with such uses.
Better photographer rights from World Press Photo restrict utilization to specific purposes (e.g. promotion of the contest and education activity):
Copyright holders retain copyright of their work. For awarded pictures, copyright holders grant the World Press Photo Foundation unlimited non-exclusive use of high-resolution pictures for activities in
all media, including social media, online and print, in relation to the
contest, the exhibition, the yearbook, the public archive, and all promotional and educational activities for and under the auspices of the
World Press Photo Foundation, without any remuneration being due.
Great photographer rights from the Sony World Photography Awards restrict
usage and duration.
You hereby grant the World Photography Organisation a non-exclusive, irrevocable licence in each Entry throughout the world for three
years in all media for any use connected to the promotion of You the
author and the SWPA event and/or competition, including, but not
limited too...
Promised exposure:
Sometimes cash and equipment prizes arent significant, but media exposure,
publications and/or exhibitions can bring significant benefits. Certain publications are known for their annual contests/awards, and the design and packaging
of those publications make them collectible.
I
II
III
IV
Shows like the Sony World Photography Awards at the Somerset House in
London or World Press Photos traveling exhibition have become increasingly
renown, and bring tens of thousands of eyeballs to the winners. Many successful
awards leverage effective public relations to generate millions more views online.
And sometimes exposure can lead to direct work either through print sales or
new assignments and commissions.
A number of photographers have told us that they are more interested in exposure that well-known contests bring them both in terms of general public
relations as well as being seen by an influential jury.
At the end of the day, winners need to feel sufficiently rewarded for entering the
contest. We spoke to winners from all the contests to get a better sense of the
landscape from the competitors vista.
A number of photographers and contest jurists have warned against producing
content specifically for contests. Decorated photojournalist Heidi Levine cautions,
Photographers should not allow their self worth and work to be determined by
only winning awards. Indeed, while many photographers expressed gratitude for
winning prizes, they were often more concerned with gaining a wider audience for
the topics they were photographing from child trafficking to conservation issues.
Travel Photographer of the Year Marsel van Oosten views contests as a valuable learning tool. If you dont win, it means that the work you thought people
would really like, doesnt jump out from those thousands of images. That doesnt
mean that the quality of your images is not good enough, but it does tell you that
its probably not original enough, or not executed perfectly.
Many photographers express some disdain for the contest culture. Nikon Photo
Contest winner Dina Bova offers some sage advice, I think it is important to
remember that photography is an art and not a sport. In art, you cannot jump
higher than everybody or run faster than others. In photography, as in any other
form of art you just need to be yourself and not try to please someone or to
predict someones tastes.
Klaus Pichler
With a plethora of options, a photographer could spend all their time (and money)
entering contest after contest. But that strategy wont necessarily yield the best return
on investment. Magnum Photography Award winner Aaron Hardin suggests, If
you want to get your work out into the world, then focus your attention, edits, and
entry fees on very specific contests. Know who will see your work. It is better to
enter three appropriate contests for your work than to waste hundreds of dollars on
entry fees on every competition available.
Sian Davey, winner of the PDN Photo Annual Arnold Newman Award, says, I
feel you have to be selective with competitions and awards do your research,
look at how they might promote or support your work after the award; ultimately asking if they have your best interests in mind.
From these criteria, weve rendered a verdict for each contest. Although we
include several hobbyist contests, the verdict is biased towards the professional
(e.g. rights-grabs can significantly affect our recommendation). You can use this
same criteria to evaluate contest that you encounter that we havent reviewed. In
I
II
III
IV
almost all cases, the availability and amount of a cash prize is a good proxy for
the worth of a contest.
Melissa Groo
Disclaimer:
We strive to publish accurate details on the contest prizes and deadlines. However, in some cases, we were unable to verify 2017 contest information and
therefore relied on information from past years.
The issue of ethics often concerns how a photographer went about capturing
an image. In some genres of photography (e.g. photojournalism), the staging of
scenes (by directing, paying, or even interacting) with the subjects are taboo. But
the role of ethics doesnt end with people.
Many wildlife and nature contests like the Audubon Photo Contest are starting to add language that forbid activities that would stress/harass or bait/lure
wildlife for a picture. Audubon goes further to restrict the use of drones because
of concerns for bird safety.
PART II
PROFILE
Russ OConnell:
#SWPA Competition
Judge & Picture Editor
for The Sunday
Times Magazine (UK)
Interview by Matthew Oxley,
World Photography Organisation
uss OConnell is Picture Editor of The Sunday Times Magazine, his latest
step in a 14-year career within the photographic and magazine publishing
industry. He worked for some of the biggest consumer publications in the UK
market before fulfilling a lifelong ambition of working for The Sunday Times,
famed for its history of printing the best in photojournalism, portraiture and
photographic essays. He has worked with some of the best photographers in the
world, commissioning assignments ranging from high-end celebrity portraiture,
music and fashion shoots to in-depth reportage photography.
Russ is judging the 2017 Sony World Photography
Awards Professional Competition, so we caught up
to learn more about his path to The Sunday Times
Magazine, plus got his advice for photographers entering this years contest.
I joined in the early 2000's just as the digital photography revolution was beginning, so when I started I was still receiving printed photos & transparencies from various agencies and photographers, while
images via email and ISDN or FTP were slowly
starting to become the standard way of delivery.
10
I
II
III
IV
the US and Europe to art direct cover shoots of various bands and musicians,
even now I think back to how lucky I was to meet and be a part of that process.
When you are on the job it just becomes normality, but if I stand back and think
about it, it was really quite a special opportunity at the time.
I moved on to the role of Photographic Director of British GQ, which had
its highs and lows. What surprised me working there was how advertising-led
the decisions made on that magazine were, often the images with advertisers
clothing would be favoured over the merit of the actual images themselves, to
me, that isn't picture editing at all. I understand the need to please advertisers,
but when it gets in the way of great content, then the line has been crossed; you
may as well be working for a catalogue.
Youve worked with some of the biggest names in photography. Tell us about
your most memorable shoot or commission.
I've been lucky enough in my career to commission and work with some of my
favourite photographers, Norman Jean Roy, Peggy Sirota, Nadav Kander to name
but a few. At Q Magazine I commissioned and art directed their Artists of the
Century cover shoot, featuring 25 of the decade's most relevant musicians and bands
to celebrate the magazine's 25th anniversary. It was a big gatefold covering over 3
panels. This meant meeting & shooting some of the most high profile musicians in
the world, from Paul McCartney, to Amy Winehouse, Rihanna, U2, Dave Grohl,
Kings of Leon, Robert Plant, etc. It was a year in progress, tight at times, but looking
back it was a major achievement and first for the music industry at the time.
Commissioning David Bailey to photograph Paul McCartney was up there with
one of my most memorable experiences. Just being in the room with 2 of the
most iconic figures from the 60's was surreal. But possibly my most memorable
shoot was travelling on tour with Bruce Springsteen in his private jet for an
expansive cover shoot & feature. It's something to tell the grandkids for sure.
If you could give one piece of advice to those entering the Professional competition of the 2017 Sony World Photography Awards, what would it be and why?
special to you personally can be lost or misunderstood to the viewer, so try and
think more commercially or choose images that are more visually appealing, but at
the same time being mindful of cliche images. I want to be blown away by seeing
a portrait or image that immediately invokes an emotional response, not a pastiche
of a famous portrait or replication of a photographer's style that has come before.
How can photographers maximize their chances of getting work in front of
editors such as yourself? What are the best practices for approaching publications and pitching stories?
Research, research, research. Ask yourself, does my work sit with this magazine or
title? There's little point approaching an editor with work that they would never
run in the pages of their magazine or paper. As editors, we often have very little
time to see portfolios, so I can't stress how important it is to be relevant in your
approach and understand the market that you are trying to pitch to. Don't be
disheartened if you get knocked back, most of the time it is simply because your
style or is not what they are looking for, or there is already someone on their books
doing what you do.
What excites you most about the photography world going into 2017?
I think we are currently in one of the most exciting times for photography. We
are in the middle of a complete digital revolution, an age where photography is
available to anyone if they want to be involved. All you need is a smart phone
and you can create and document what you see. Long gone are the days of
needing full professional photographic training to be able to understand how
to take a photograph; it is literally at your fingertips. What has surprised me is
how strong the quality of the current generation of cameras phones are. They
have completely killed the point and shoot market. You don't need high end
DSLR equipment and expensive lenses to capture amazing images. Looking at
photos taken on high end equipment side by side with smartphone technology,
the line is beginning to blur, obviously there will always be a place for the more
serious kit, but there are some people out there doing amazing things with the
cameras on their phone, be it citizen journalism or hobbyists taking landscape
photos on a weekend walk. To me thiscan only be a good thing for the future of
photography and its accessibility and relevance in the world.
11
PROFILE
Damien Demolder:
#SWPA Open &
Youth Competition
Judge, Photographer
and Journalist (UK)
Interview by Matthew Oxley,
World Photography Organisation
amien Demolder is a photographer, journalist and photographic equipment expert, speaker, judge and educator. He has worked in the photographic publishing industry for 19 years, including 15 years at the worlds only
weekly photo magazine, Amateur Photographer, where he was editor. He writes
and tests for dpreview.com, British Journal of Photography, Amateur Photographer
and a range of other UK and international publications.
He uses a wide range of equipment, from wooden
plate cameras to the latest DSLRs, is a great fan of
the emerging compact system camera and all products that make good photography more accessible
to more people.
Although he specialises in street photography, he
also shoots portraits, landscapes, architecture, natural
macro and occasionally even wildlife and weddings.
Damien shared with us what excites him most about
photography in 2017 and the #1 piece of advice he
has for those hoping to win this years competition.
Hi Damien. As someone with a unique position in
the photography world: your experience spans
many realms and disciplines, what excites you
most about photography as we head into 2017?
12
I
II
III
IV
Both of these developments, the speed of cameras and the growth of medium
format, are fantastic news for creative photography. They clear the path for new
ways of shooting and new ways for people to express what they see. They will
add a massive buzz to the photographic world.
Why photography? Tell us about your background and how you got to this point
in your career.
I was going to be a musician but realised in time that for me it was all hard work
and no talent. Id had a camera since I was about 14 but it took a while for me
to realise how much I loved taking pictures. I was able to take art at school and
began to teaching myself from books and magazines and from experimenting
in the darkroom. I became obsessed quite quickly and was so driven that I was
able to skip two years of college because Id taught myself already. I learnt about
colour and printing, as well as dealing with people and shooting consistently
and quickly, when I worked as a cruise ship photographer. The places I visited
and the people I met opened my eyes to the world and showed me alternative
experiences and ways of thinking and being.
After some time assisting advertising photographers and working for myself, I
joined the photographic magazine world and was able to totally immerse myself
in photography. I went to the launch of every camera I could and found out
why they were made that way. I interviewed photographers and questioned the
life out of them to understand how they worked and thought. I spoke with enthusiasts, professionals, camera engineers, lens designers and retailers alike and
listened to their moans, elations, struggles, frustrations and passions. I studied
cameras, lenses, accessories, software and the pictures that they make and the
people that used them. I breathed in photography from as many angles as I
could and still do.
Kei Nomiyama, Open photographer of the Year, 2016 Sony World Photography Awards
13
I
II
III
IV
Of course the greatest change during my time at AP was the shift from film
to digital imaging. When I started at the magazine digital imaging was still in
nappies and presented very limited options not only in terms of the equipment
but also regarding what you could do with the images they were so small.
By the time I left the magazine only a small proportion of the readership was
actively shooting on film. The gradual shift caused all sorts of heated discussions
over that period while the technology slowly caught up with the quality of film
and while the cameras eventually came down in price. The revolution has been
a good one, as most artistic revolutions are, because it has given us new tools
and new ways of doing things. That keeps us fresh. Before my time there are
arguments around the benefits of the 35mm format over medium format, and
before that medium format film over glass plates. We even had a letter in the
archive from a reader who proclaimed that plate photography would never be
as good as wood cuts proving that even in the 1890s these discussions around
evolving technology were going on.
Photography and photographers stayed very much the same, though, throughout
my time on the magazine. Trends sift backwards and forwards as they repeat
themselves across the decades, while some photographers strive to break new
ground and others to shoot the same as their fellows. Digital technology has
settled down now and we have generations of photographers who have never
touched a roll of film. Software has replaced the darkroom and memory cards
the film, but the subjects we put in front of the camera and our desperation to
express ourselves remain constant. Photography still incites passion, compulsion,
introspection and communication. There is still nothing else quite like it.
If you could give one piece of advice to those entering the Open competition of
the 2017 Sony World Photography Awards, what would it be?
Try not to shoot images that have been done a thousand times before and which
only copy and emulate others. Originality is very difficult to achieve in a pure
sense, but being a bit different isnt. Try to put yourself in your images and
submit what makes you happy. You dont have to shoot in the same way as others,
or the same things. Your life and your experience are different to everyone elses
so use your individuality.
Do you have a photographic philosophy?
14
PART III:
15
DEADLINE
January 4, 2017
Winners announced: February
PRIZES
Grand Prize:
USD$2,000
ENTRY FEES
Print submission:
$45 (members)
$65 (non-members)
Album submission:
$50 (members)
$60 (non-members)
In-camera Artistry:
$30 (members)
$40 (non-members)
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
Jacob Atmodjojo
Filmmaking:
$55 (members)
$65 (non-members)
16
DEADLINE
January 2, 2017
Winners announced: early February
PRIZES
TBA
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
Davide Lopresti
17
DEADLINE
January 5, 2017
Winners announced:
after January 31, 2017
PRIZES
USD$5,000
+ flight/accommodation to London to
attend the Sony World Photography
Awards (open).
Flight/accommodation (youth).
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
Kei Nomiyama
18
DEADLINE
PRIZES
USD$25,000
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Exhibited at the Somerset House in London; published in the winners book; featured
in online gallery
Nikolai Linares, winner of the Sports category in 2016, advocates entering the
contest, If you want your stories taken seriously and want people to hear what you
have to tell them with your story, you should always enter the big competitions,
while praising the contest organization, I must say that my whole experience
with the contest has been that the organization is very professional. They took
care of everything from hotel, to flights and all. Getty Images staff photographer
John Moore took the coveted Liris DOr award in 2015 with his stunning work on
the Ebola epidemic in Liberia. The World Photography Organisation very actively
promotes the Sony Awards on social media platforms, so they really do bring wide
exposure to the work. Plus, the exhibition of all the winners' work at Somerset
House in London in very well done and drew huge crowds. I would recommend this
competition to all photographers who want to highlight their work.
VERDICT
A huge cash prize, plus gear, plus an exhibition, plus travel and expenses to the
awards there isn't much not to like about this contest. The exhibition at the
Somerset House might lack the prestige of a show at the Whitney, but its pretty
damn close.
Nikolai Linares
19
DEADLINE
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
20
DEADLINE
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Nancy Borowick
VERDICT
The cash prize, exhibit and master classes put World Press
Photo largely into a category of their own. To his credit,
Executive Director Lars Boering has taken a proactive stand
in trying to manage the everpresent issue of manipulation,
ethics and veracity in the field of photojournalism.
21
DEADLINE
PRIZES
Grand Prize:
1,000,000
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
The 2016 2nd Place winner Heidi Levine speaks highly of the
contest, I was impressed by the goal of having this contest
focus on the perspective of the civilians. The recognition of
my work has helped to open new opportunities such as being
asked to appear on panel discussions and speak about the
victims of war. The award has allowed Levine to pursue her
projects, and she says, The generous cash prize and camera
has also enabled me to continue with my commitment as a
photojournalist to use the power of photography as a universal tool to bring greater understanding and a voice to those
who are unable to do so themselves.
Heidi Levine
VERDICT
22
DEADLINE
PRIZES
500,000
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Work may appear in exhibitions at venues managed by Nikon and on Nikon social
media
When Dina Bova, winner of the Grand Prize in 2012-2013, entered the contest, she
lowered her expectation because of her style of photography. Im not a pure and
classical photographer, but rather a digital artist that uses photography as a raw material for creating new compositions with computer...But I was nicely surprised to find
out that this contest is very progressive regarding this matter. Indeed, over the years,
the judges have selected an enormous range of styles. Beyond the generous prizes,
Bova compliments the resulting exposure, There were many articles about me and
different magazines, I was invited to TV programs, was given interviews, was invited
to give lectures. Also I had a fantastic trip to Japan for the awards ceremony.
Dina Bova
VERDICT
If there was ever a year to enter the contest, it is this one. The 100th Anniversary
Prize is worth nearly $14,000 USD and the other prizes are no slouches either. The
contest might not have the cachet and name recognition of other prizes, but that
shouldnt stop you from entering.
ENTRY FEES
None
Dina Bova
23
DEADLINE
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
Camile Michele
24
DEADLINE
PRIZES
USD$10,000
for photo of the year
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
25
DEADLINE
February 7, 2017
Winners announced: May
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Inaugural winner Tamina-Florentine Zuch says the prize package of Zeiss lenses have changed her photography, I would
never have thought about spending such a huge amount of
money on camera equipment/lenses, but now I work with
them I can see the difference and would not want to get back
to my old equipment again. She also believes the association
between Zeiss and the World Photography Association was
a smart pairing, [The contest] got huge exposure and the
winning photographs even got exhibited in Somerset House
in London which was amazing. Zuch compliments the quality
of the jury and recommends the contest to anyone, not only
with the aim to win a prize, but to get the chance to show
your work to experienced people.
VERDICT
26
DEADLINE
Mid-February
Winners announced: April
PRIZES
$5,000
for Grand Prize
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Published in "Audubon" magazine, "Nature's Best Photography" magazine, and displayed in the 2016 Nature's Best
Photography Exhibition at the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C.
2016 Grand Prize Winner Bonnie Block says the exposure from
the award was nothing short of amazing. Major news outlets
around the world pick up the winners and feature them. The
Smithsonian Natural History Museum does hang prints of
the winners of the Audubon contest in coordination with the
Natures Best Photography Awards for a year. The win helped
generate more than a handful of sales (a lot of the time from
my PhotoShelter site) as well as speaking engagements to
birding and photography organizations.
2015 Grand Prize Winner Melissa Groo says the exposure was
invaluable, Winning absolutely led to more work, but, as with
anything, partly due to my finding ways to take advantage of
it. You have to actively promote yourself in all possible ways.
Since her win, Groo has joined the contest jury, and has helped
to guide what she calls much-needed attention to the ethics
behind the shot, a consideration sorely lacking from many
contests these days.
Melissa Groo
VERDICT
27
DEADLINE
February
PRIZES
$15,000
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Greg Kahn
VERDICT
Its hard to compare winning a special award vs winning a category. One offers thousands of dollars in prize money, while
the other one gets you a free subscription to PDN. Apples and
oranges aside, buyers and photo editors consistently tell us
that they pay attention to these awards, and one could argue
that this qualified exposure is as meaningful as cash.
THE 2017 PHOTOGRAPHERS GUIDE TO PHOTO CONTESTS
28
DEADLINE
April
PRIZES
25,000
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
You can complain about the price of a Leica, but you cant
complain about the prizes in this contest. The diversity of
winners (both in terms of geography and subject matter) keep
this contest interesting and relevant.
Scarlett Coten
29
DEADLINE
Mid-March
Winners announced: May
PRIZES
3000
ENTRY FEES
30
free for Young Photographer category
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
30
Px3
Now celebrating its 10th year, the well-regarded Prix de la Photographie, Paris promotes photography from around the world in a six categories (advertising, photojournalism, book, fine art, nature and portraiture)
DEADLINE
March 30
PRIZES
USD$5,000
(professional)
USD$2,000
(non-professional)
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Rob Gregory won in 2015 for the Best New Talent category.
While I can't say that this competition directly led to more
work, winning and having your work exhibited in Paris is a
great rsum item that helps clients feel more comfortable
when they are considering hiring you.
VERDICT
31
DEADLINE
March 2019
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
Jody MacDonald
32
DEADLINE
March 31
PRIZES
USD$5,000
grand prize
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
The quality of winners rivals any nature and wildlife competition in the world. We like the fact that the rights grab is
limited to promotion of the contest and for a fixed duration
of five years.
33
DEADLINE
March
PRIZES
Winners plaque
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
There is no doubt that the NPPA award has cachet particularly in the US that all but guarantees exposure to top editors. But like Pictures of the Year International, the contest
might struggle to attract top talent when richer prizes with
growing influence are popping up around the world.
Scott McIntyre
34
DEADLINE
March 31
PRIZES
USD$4,000
+ trophy
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Exhibition in Kuala Lumpur
Kathrine Tschirner, First Prize winner in the 2016 Portrait category, says, The KL Photo Awards is more than recommendable. It was noticeable that the organizers have a real interest
in photography. The event has been implemented with great
attention to detail, recognizable by the good prints and a
really masterful hanging in the beautiful rooms of the White
Box Gallery. 2016 Open Category winner Jessica Hines was
surprised and delighted to win with her odd image, and says,
One of the reasons I entered was because of the impressive
list of jurors.
VERDICT
The fee is nominal and the prizes are significant. Plus the
award trophy is truly a work of art, and would look awfully
good on your shelf.
Kathrine Tschirner
35
DEADLINE
April
PRIZES
2,500
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Exhibition at the Royal Observatory Greenwich in the UK; published in the Astronomy Photographer of the Year book.
VERDICT
The entry process is clunky and the rights grab doesnt favor
the photographer. But the prize money and press exposure
has grown over the past year, and there really isnt any other
game in town for astrophotography.
36
DEADLINE
PRIZES
1st Prize:
USD$3,000 towards Nikon equipment;
total of (20) prizes totaling around $10,000.
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Ralph Grimm
VERDICT
37
DEADLINE
May
PRIZES
$2,000
for a series
$1,000
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Aaron Hardin, winner of the Fine Art category, believes the value
of the contest isnt just about the prizes. The most significant
part of winning the Magnum Photography Award wasn't the
money or exposure. It was knowing that someone like Martin
Parr, president of Magnum and leading authority on the
photobook, not only saw my work, but agreed with the other six
esteemed judges that I should be recognized. I never thought
that my little project about becoming a father in rural west
Tennessee would illicit such a positive response.
VERDICT
The brand is formidable and the jury is undeniably accomplished and renown. Images may only be used in promotion
with the contest, and the entry fee is reasonable. This new
contest shows a lot of promise in its inaugural year.
Aaron Hardin
38
DEADLINE
May
PRIZES
4,000
ENTRY FEES
10
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Exhibition at next years festival
Klaus Pichler won the 2016 award with his project Golden Days
Before They End, which captures life within small bars and inns
near Vienna. Pichler saw a significant increase of interest in his
working following the win. Winning has definitely lead to more
interest in my projects, especially in Italy. The award has, as I
have learned from the numerous newspaper requests I received
afterwards, a very high reputation in Italy and is also very well
noticed in other countries. My project has been presented in the
most important Italian newspapers and magazines and numerous online magazines and blogs, the selling of the book in Italy
has risen and I have received some messages with notes and
requests on the project.
VERDICT
Klaus Pichler
39
DEADLINE
Mid-May
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Exhibition at the Galera Valid Foto in Barcelona & at DOCfield Festival, published on LensCulture
Although its still too early to determine whether the award will lead to more work, BIPA 2016 winner Lola
Montserrat says, Its a good way to publicize your project. And, of course, Im happy to be one of the winners
amongst so many with great work.
VERDICT
The exhibition at the DOCfield Festival will certainly generate eyeballs for the winners, and seems to have
solid traction in Spain. But the high entry fee and lack of prizes makes the current incarnation difficult to
recommend.
40
DEADLINE
June
PRIZES
1st Prize:
Parrot Bebop drone + Sky Controller,
Kodak Pixpro sp 360, 1-year Adobe
Creative Cloud Photography subscription,
150 offered by Picanova on a print on
canvas, aluminum or plexiglas.
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Michael B. Rasmussen
VERDICT
41
DEADLINE
Early June
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Exhibition in the UK and Japan
VERDICT
Alexey Furman
Given the low number of applicants and the relatively rich cash
award, this is a great contest for young photojournalists to
sink their teeth into. The jury is top notch and their expertise
spans a range of documentary styles. The 2016 winners covered topics from around the world indicating the jurys broad
appetite for subject matter.
42
DEADLINE
June 30
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Anthony Lau took the Grand Prize in 2016 for his image of
a Mongolian horsemen. National Geographic is a name
immediately recognizable to a vast number of audiences, from
organizations, professional photographers to even my sons (7
& 10). I am not a full time professional, but after winning the
placement in this contest, a lot of different opportunities came
to me, ranging from charity events, contest judges, photo
talks and other projects. But the value of the contest exceeds
the prizes for Lau. While the prizes are definitely worth the
participation, I think the real deal is the opportunities and
possibilities that comes after and I would wholeheartedly
recommend this contest everyone!
VERDICT
Anthony Lau
Weve never liked the rights grab language which allows the
use of downloadable wallpaper from the NatGeo website for
all entries. But like many large circulation magazines, the photo contest targets consumers, not professional photographers
who would undoubtedly cringe at this stipulation. NatGeo has
unmistakable prestige and value of the 7-day cruise package
is pretty sweet.
43
DEADLINE
Late June
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
$35 (Professional)
$30 (Amateur)
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
The jury list is international and diverse, and in normal circumstances, would be a cause for celebration. But we simply cant
understand why a contest that charges such a large entry
fee cant offer anything more than a piece of paper as a prize.
And if you were hoping to put a copy of awards catalog, The
Journal, on your shelf, youre out of luck. Its only available as a
downloadable PDF.
44
APA Awards
APA is one of the most important trade organizations for commercial photographers with both national and local chapters around the US. Their annual awards is a veritable whos who of commercial and advertising photography with work that youve probably seen in the wild.
DEADLINE
July
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
Matt Sartain
45
DEADLINE
Mid-July
PRIZES
USD$3,000
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Max Rive
2015 Major Open Award Winner Max Rive believes the contest is efficiently run and well-regarded, but ironically thinks the prize is ill-conceived. The main
prize, the printer [Epson Stylus Pro], is so big it doesn't fit in any persons house. I stored it in a garage somewhere and it is still there. And while the prize
didnt directly lead to more work, he believes the association is worthwhile, saying I'm using the title which might influence others perception about me as
a photographer.
VERDICT
The Epson Pano Awards serve a very specific niche and offer a ton of great prizes in a number of different categories with very photographer-friendly terms.
You might have to leave the printer in the garage, but were pretty sure you can use the cash for something interesting.
46
DEADLINE
July
PRIZES
6,000
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Potential exhibition
VERDICT
In the digital age, its rare to find anyone touting the benefits
of large format photography, let alone handing out a huge
monetary prize. But Camera Clara does just that, and the winners work reflects a quietness afforded by the deliberate and
slow process.
Yann Laubscher
THE 2017 PHOTOGRAPHERS GUIDE TO PHOTO CONTESTS
47
DEADLINE
August
PRIZES
USD$10,000
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
Maxine Helfman
THE 2017 PHOTOGRAPHERS GUIDE TO PHOTO CONTESTS
48
DEADLINE
Late-August
Winners announced: October
PRIZES
AUD$50,000
all finalists receive $1,000
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
You wont find much dissent from the winners of the Moran. 2016
Winner Johannes Reinhardt says, Winning the prize was an
amazing experience and the exposure I had is incredible. It was in
the news, all major newspapers around the country and naturally
my facebook went a bit viral tooand we havent even touched
the AU$50.000 prize money yet. Suzanne McCorkell, winner
of the 2014 prize, speaks highly of the generous prize and the
efforts of the Moran Foundation to promote art within Australia.
[The award] has certainly promoted me as an artist within the
Photographic Community, for which I am grateful.
VERDICT
Johannes Reinhardt
49
DEADLINE
Early October
Winners announced: December
PRIZES
2,500
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
VERDICT
50
DEADLINE
Mid-October
Winners announced:
4-5 weeks after deadline
PRIZES
$2500
grants (8)
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Digital gallery exhibition at the International Center of Photography Museum in New York City, and opportunities for exposure at
over 50 international photography festivals
VERDICT
51
DEADLINE
November
PRIZES
USD$1,500
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Publication in The Journal
VERDICT
Piers Golden
52
DEADLINE
November 4
PRIZES
ENTRY FEES
PROMISED EXPOSURE
James Smart
VERDICT
53
DEADLINE
November 30
Winners announced: Spring
PRIZES
USD$2,500
Grand Prize
United Eco-skies Sustainable Travel category offers (2) round trip tickets in the US,
Caribbean, Mexico and Central America
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Publication on Smithsonian website
VERDICT
54
DEADLINE
December 2
PRIZES
USD$3,000
ENTRY FEES
None
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Exhibition at Aperture Gallery
2016 Prize Winner Eli Durst commended Aperture for its strong
promotional efforts saying, From the time I was announced as
a finalist up until the exhibition, they helped me design and publicize the show a great deal. I feel extremely thankful to have had
the opportunity to work with the Aperture team. The win has led
to a number of inquiries for Durst. a bunch of different people
from the photo world, including photo editors, collectors, and
other photographers, reached out to me.
VERDICT
Eli Durst
55
DEADLINE
December 15
PRIZES
10,000
ENTRY FEES
30.00
PROMISED EXPOSURE
Tim Laman
VERDICT
56
DEADLINE
Rolling
Winners announced:
~2 weeks after deadline
PRIZES
varies by category
ENTRY FEES
varies by category
PROMISED EXPOSURE
None
VERDICT
Michael Jolliffe
57
PART IV
Conclusion
here are many photo contests out there almost too many to choose from. So before
entering, you should make sure its the right
one for your business and brand. Take time to think
through first why you want to enter your work and
what youd like to get out of the experience. Are you
looking for exposure? Feedback? Prizes? Do you have
high regards for those who have won in the past? Have
you researched the jury? Make sure you read through
the contests Terms and Conditions, FAQs, plus look
at previous winners work to decide if it might be a
good fit. Remember that some photo contests are better than others (hopefully our verdicts helped!). Youll
want to align yourself with the competitions that are
well-regarded and respected in the industry.
58