Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
NEIGHBORHOOD
STORMWATER PLAN
A UNIQUE APPROACH TO
STORMWATER PLANNING,
IMPLEMENTATION AND
COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION
Milwaukee, WI
January 2015
PROJECT TEAM
Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers
GRAEF
City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works
Milwaukee County Parks
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
Urban Ecology Center
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NEIGHBORHOOD BACKGROUND
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
11
14
28
29
CONCLUSION
34
35
39
42
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
The Pulaski Park Neighborhood is located on Milwaukees South Side and is home to over 18,000 residents living in just under
two square miles. The Kinnickinnic River runs through this community and is beginning to be seen as an asset in part due to
large scale channel restoration being undertaken by the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District. The channel restoration
has opened the doors for partners to develop the Pulaski Park Neighborhood Stormwater Plan that identifies complementary
projects that will:
What makes this project unique is the collaboration of community, public, and private sector partners who have been working
together since 2012. The plan identifies opportunities to revitalize Pulaski Park and address other community needs related to
health, housing, and environmental education. This plan was developed with public, private, non-profit, and resident partners
in order to identify:
How green infrastructure implementation can be leveraged to achieve additional triple bottom line goals
A comprehensive plan that meets multiple stakeholder goals and can be implemented in a phased approach
How partners can work together to meet stormwater management and community goals in a more financially effective
and impactful way.
Thank you to all of the people who have provided input into the development and implementation of this plan!
NEIGHBORHOOD
BACKGROUND
The Kinnickinnic River neighborhood is a diverse and vibrant community on Milwaukees south side. The boundaries of the
neighborhood extend from S. 27th Street to Interstate 43/94 and W. Oklahoma Avenue to W. Lincoln Avenue. The neighborhood
has a population of 18,280 residents in 5,378 households living in under two square miles. Of these households, 71 percent
are Latino and 38 percent of residents are under the age of 19. Homeownership is approximately 67 percent and the average
household income is $32,030 per year.1
The neighborhood is named after the Kinnickinnic River, or KK River, one of three rivers that flow into the Milwaukee River
Estuary and Lake Michigan harbor. The KK River drains a watershed that covers 25 square miles, and is the smallest within
the Milwaukee River Basin. The area surrounding the river is the most urbanized and densely populated of all of the Milwaukee
rivers and has experienced significant flooding events over the years. Since the 1960s, the river has been lined with concrete
starting near Interstate 43/94 as a solution to minimize flooding in the surrounding neighborhoods. Flooding persists however,
and safety has become a significant concern given the high velocity water that results during storms in the concrete-lined
riverbed.
Through substantial community engagement efforts, residents are in a position to scale up commitments to environmental
education, stewardship, and community ownership of green infrastructure projects in the neighborhood. Currently there are
65 property owners in the KK River neighborhood that contribute to these stormwater efforts many of which are along S.
16th Street, facing Pulaski Park. These efforts include a total of 3,868 square feet of rain gardens, 140 rain barrels and 13
stormwater shrubs. This is significant as these efforts work in tandem with the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage Districts
(MMSD) Kinnickinnic River Flood Management Project; supports City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee County and regional plans;
helps address regulatory relief; trains residents on how and why to manage stormwater; and illustrates the need and impact of
cross jurisdictional collaboration. SSCHC has been working to support these initiatives to ensure that improvements in quality
of life and health outcomes are also achieved in addition to flood management goals.
1
Project Area
Pulaski Park
KK River
W. Lincoln Avenue
I-94/I-43
W. Oklahoma Avenue
Figure 1.
S. 6th Street
S. 16th Street
S. 20th Street
S. 27th Street
W. Cleveland Avenue
WATER QUALITY
NON-POINT SOURCE
Refers to a diffuse source of pollution, often
associated with large areas and certain
types of land use. This pollution is caused
by rainfall or snowmelt moving over and
through the ground. As the runoff moves,
it picks up and carries away natural and
human-made pollutants, depositing them
into lakes, rivers, wetlands, coastal waters
and ground waters.
Figure 2.
TOTAL MAXIMUM
DAILY LOADS (TMDLs)
A water quality plan that sets goals or targets
for watershed restoration plans. Basically it
is a pollution budget for a water body or
watershed that establishes the pollutant
reduction needed from each pollutant source
to meet water quality standards.
http://water.epa.gov/
http://dnr.wi.gov/
A PHASED APPROACH
Project partners for this Plan include Sixteenth Street
Community Health Centers (SSCHC), GRAEF, City of
Milwaukee Department of Public Works (DPW), Milwaukee
County Parks, Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
(MMSD), and the Urban Ecology Center (UEC). Partners
were chosen not only because of their vested interest in
the area (City and County are landowners), but also to
ensure that a comprehensive approach to the identification
of stormwater management strategies and quality of life
opportunities were incorporated into the Plan. Partners
have been working together since 2012 to set performance
standards, identify green infrastructure options, and obtain
community input. What makes this project unique is the
collaboration of partners (community, public and private
sector), joint implementation of projects that address
performance standards that support various stormwater
management goals and plans, and identification of
opportunities to leverage green infrastructure to improve
and revitalize the neighborhood and Pulaski Park. The
outcome is a three phased project approach that will
result in the implementation of a cost effective mix of
green infrastructure on various properties as well as
improvements for quality of life. These strategies can be
implemented in a phased approach, on different land use
types, and result in regulatory relief for municipalities and
Milwaukee County.
2012
PRE-PLANNING
(Fall 12 - Fall 13)
2013
2014
PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS
1.
2.
2015
IMPLEMENTATION AND
REVITALIZATION
(2015 and Beyond)
2016
8
PROJECT AREA
The project area is 108 acres and includes a variety of land uses, property owner types (public and private), separate and
combined sewer areas, and approximately 2,000 linear feet of a concrete channelized urban river. The KK River runs through
Milwaukee Countys Pulaski Park which occupies 25.9 acres of the project area and serves as the only green space in the
broader neighborhood region (see Figure 1). The Pulaski Park area is highly trafficked and sees over 8,500 cars per day along
S 16th Street alone. These combined site characteristics provide a unique space for project development and implementation.
The project area is divided into three zones: Residential Cluster, 16th Street Corridor, and Industrial Sector. These three
zones were born out of a project stakeholder workshop that asked members from Milwaukee County Parks, City of Milwaukee
DPW, MMSD, SSCHC, UEC, and GRAEF to specify ideal locations for a variety of green infrastructure elements. The
distinction of these three zones not only call for implementation within different land use types (e.g. residential, publicly-owned
land, industrial), but also creates an approachable implementation plan for stakeholders and funders.
While the Industrial Sector provides opportunities for green infrastructure, specific green infrastructure strategies for these
properties are outside of the project scope. As a follow-up to this PPNSP, specific stormwater management plans should look
to be completed in collaboration with individual industrial owners.
W. Lincoln Avenue
W
.W
in
dl
ak
e
Av
en
ue
RESIDENTIAL
CLUSTER
PULASKI PARK
16TH
STREET
CORRIDOR
Project Area
Green Infrastructure
Implementation Zones
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
0.1 miles
Figure 3.
9
S. 16th Street
W. Cleveland Avenue
S. 20th Street
Figure 4.
THE CRITERIA
The Pulaski Park Neighborhood Stormwater Plan has integrated multiple stakeholder interests that will not only result in
improvements in stormwater management techniques and water quality, but also identify opportunities to leverage those
improvements and investments to have an impact on other quality of life indicators in the community. These include
enhancements to the Pulaski Park pavilion, increased use of the park, creation of a community hub, habitat restoration, water
conservation education, and green infrastructure on private property. Additionally, programs related to home improvement
resources available from the City can be leveraged in the project geography. The list below represents key criteria identified
by project partners that reflect how recommendations identified in the PPNSP can be strategically implemented on various
properties that will result in more impactful projects that benefit all stakeholders, public and private alike.
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD)
Captures the first half inch of rainfall from the project area in order to manage rain where it falls
MS4 PERMIT
Milwaukee County
Community
Other Criteria
Cost share coordination and sharing of resources among multiple partners (such as the City and County) should be
given special consideration in order to promote examples of cost effective intergovernmental coordination.
Location from a geographic standpoint, projects should occur in several different parts of the project area on different
types of land (e.g. an alley, street, private residence, and a park space), and places with high visibility.
Overlap with existing capital improvement projects (e.g. DPW paving schedule, Pulaski Park improvements) since
the implementation of green infrastructure will almost always require additional resources, preferable projects are those
which overlap with anticipated expenditures (both capital and operating costs) or other funded projects.
Supports other regional planning efforts since the implementation of green infrastructure will align with the mission
statements and goals of other public, private, and not-for-profit entities, opportunities should be selected that offer
considerable overlap or mutual support with those other missions and goals.
Leverage green infrastructure improvements - connect stormwater management to community revitalization needs (e.g.
park revitalization, habitat improvements, housing resources, community engagement)
10
STAKEHOLDER
ENGAGEMENT
Community Input
Kinnickinnic River Corridor Neighborhood Plan
Over the past 20 years the KK River has experienced several
major storm events that have caused significant flooding
in the surrounding neighborhoods. MMSD has responded
with the implementation of the Kinnickinnic River Flood
Management Project which includes widening the channel
and removing the rivers concrete lining between Interstate
43 and S. 27th Street. To allow space for the wider channel,
83 buildings, primarily residential, will be acquired and
deconstructed or demolished. The work is estimated to
cost more than $65 million and be completed by 2020.
This substantial investment and neighborhood change
led to the development of the Kinnickinnic River Corridor
Neighborhood Plan, which lays out community supported
recommendations for neighborhood improvement projects
which will complement the MMSD investment and improve
the quality of life for residents.
The PPNSP will not only help Milwaukee County and the
City of Milwaukee meet their stormwater regulatory goals
in a cost effective and community driven manner, but also
assist in identifying other quality of life improvements that
will be realized through the phased implementation of this
Plan.
We use our four rain barrels for everything from watering our plants
to mopping the kitchen floor and we love them! The neighbors have
been interested in the barrels as well. My neighbor has basement
backup issues, so he would love to have one of his own.
-KK River Resident
Figure 5.
Stakeholder workshop.
Figure 6.
11
Engaging the entire community creates a vision for the future based on peoples
and businesses needs, desires, and aspirations. This vision guides the plan and
ultimately implementation. A sustainable communities and green infrastructure
plan will touch nearly every aspect of a communitys design. Involving a wide
range of community members in developing both the vision and the plan creates
broad support and encourages multiple champions to emerge to handle different
aspects of implementation. Such broad-based involvement also helps ensure
people from all walks of life, including vulnerable and disadvantaged populations,
can share in the benefits that come from implementing a green infrastructure plan.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
June 2014
A rain barrel giveaway and workshop invited 20 residents
to learn about the PPNSP project, how it fits in with other
flood management efforts, and learn how clustering green
infrastructure on residential properties in conjunction with
larger efforts (e.g. green alleys) can have a significant
impact on reducing flooding and creating environmental
stewardship.
July 2014
A community design charrette was held at Pulaski
Park Pool where 25 residents who had participated in
past programs or events were strategically invited to
provide in depth feedback on the direction of the plan
and park revitalization efforts. In addition to residents,
other stakeholders were invited in order to ensure that
multiple user needs would be met through this plan.
Stakeholders included Milwaukee County Parks, local
schools, organizations who use the park for structured
events (i.e. soccer clubs), and users that primarily use the
pool. This community design charrette offered a way for
12
Figure 12.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Figure 11.
Figure 13.
GREEN
INFRASTRUCTURE
RECOMMENDATIONS
RAINWATER HARVESTING
Rainwater harvesting systems capture rainwater and store
it for reuse. Examples include rain barrels and cisterns.
RAIN GARDENS
Rain gardens are biofiltration systems that have no
underground components and the stormwater is
infiltrated into the soil.
14
STORMWATER TREES
PERMEABLE PAVEMENTS
BIOFILTRATION BASINS
BIOSWALES
15
Rain Cistern
Rain Garden
Stormwater Tree
Permeable Pavement
Bioswale
Biofiltration Basin
1 Cost estimates are to be used for planning purposes only. The actual construction costs can vary dramatically depending on the scope of work to be performed, varying costs of materials
and labor access, schedule of work, and other site restrictions.
2 Design of athletic field with sub-grade drainage system requires a number of other elements that will add to the overall cost of construction (e.g. concrete curbing, connecting sub-grade
drainage system to existing storm sewer).
16
Whats WinSLAMM?
TSS Reduction
Phosphorus Reduction
Volume Reduction (based on the average
annual rainfall)
Volume Reduction (based on the first 1/2 of rainfall)
Building
Parking
Driveway
Sidewalk
Street
Alley
Landscape
Total Acres
90.09
26.51
6.66
0.8
4.08
14.18
2.6
34.93
Percent Area
100%
29%
7%
1%
5%
16%
3%
39%
35,300
5,800
6,500
654
1,500
14,900
2,246
3,700
Percent TSS:
100%
17%
18%
2%
4%
6%
42%
11%
84
18
31
16
Percent Phos.
100%
21%
8%
2%
5%
37%
7%
20%
5,181,000
2,550,200
470,200
62,874
322,200
1,283,500
231,426
260,600
Percent volume
100%
49%
9%
1%
6%
25%
5%
5%
100,112
47,623
12,081
1,448
7,409
25,732
5,324
Percent volume
100%
48%
12%
2%
7%
26%
5%
Figure 14.
17
Land Use
Area
TSS
Phosphorus
Volume
(avg. annual)
Volume
(1st 1/2)
Figure 15.
Bar graph showing the exis ng output data according to land use.
Exact drainage areas must be investigated for each BMP for more
accurate TSS and volume removals
1 The notes listed here apply to all summary tables throughout the report.
18
80% TSS removal goal from 1.5 feet or greater of engineered soil
INTERVENTION SUMMARY
Land Use Totals
Building
Parking
Driveway
Sidewalk
Street
Alley
Landscape
Total Acres
90.09
26.51
6.66
0.8
4.08
14.18
2.6
34.93
Percent Area
100%
29%
7%
1%
5%
16%
3%
39%
35,300
5,800
6,500
654
1,500
14,900
2,246
3,700
Percent TSS:
100%
17%
18%
2%
4%
6%
42%
11%
17,600
% reduction:
50%
84
18
31
16
Percent Phos.
100%
21%
8%
2%
5%
37%
7%
20%
48
% reduction:
42%
5,181,000
2,550,200
470,200
62,874
322,200
1,283,500
231,426
260,600
Percent volume
100%
49%
9%
1%
6%
25%
5%
5%
4,220,000
% reduction:
20%
100,112
47,623
12,081
1,448
7,409
25,732
5,324
48%
12%
2%
7%
26%
5%
Percent volume
100%
55,035
% reduction:
45%
Figure 16.
Land Use
Area
TSS
Phosphorus
Volume
(avg. annual)
Volume
(1st 1/2)
December 2014 WinSLAMM table showing the overall TSS, phosphorus, and volume
reduc on numbers for the en re project area.
TSS Reduction
50%
Phosphorus Reduction
42%
20%
45%
19
Building
Parking
Driveway
Sidewalk
Street
Alley
Landscape
Total Acres
90.09
26.51
6.66
0.8
4.08
14.18
2.6
34.93
35,300
5,800
6,500
654
1,500
14,900
2,246
3,700
rain
gardens
(150); rain
barrels
(150)
29,500 SF
permeable
pavement;
biofilters (2);
catch basins (2)
44,640 SF
permeable
pavement
& biofilters
(12)
11,80 SF
permeable
pavement
biofilters
(1) &
synthetic
turf field
GI Treatment:
23,600
5,200
4,000
7,100
1,595
3,500
% reduction:
34%
10%
38%
48%
39%
6%
84
18
31
16
rain
gardens
(150); rain
barrels
(150)
29,500 SF
permeable
pavement;
biofilters (2);
catch basins (2)
44,640 SF
permeable
pavement
& biofilters
(12)
11,80 SF
permeable
pavement
biofilters
(1) &
synthetic
turf field
GI Treatment:
61
16
16
14
% reduction:
27%
11%
29%
49%
34%
12%
5,181,000
2,550,200
470,200
1,283,500
231,426
260,600
rain
gardens
(150); rain
barrels
(150)
29,500 SF
permeable
pavement;
biofilters (2);
catch basins (2)
44,640 SF
permeable
pavement
& biofilters
(12)
11,80 SF
permeable
pavement
biofilters
(1) &
synthetic
turf field
GI Treatment:
62,874
322,200
4,580,000
2,307,220
400,497
1,035,200
203,637
238,400
% reduction:
13%
10%
15%
20%
12%
9%
100,112
47,623
12,081
25,732
5,324
rain
gardens
(150); rain
barrels
(150)
29,500 SF
permeable
pavement;
biofilters (2);
catch basins (2)
44,640 SF
permeable
pavement
& biofilters
(12)
11,80 SF
permeable
pavement
GI Treatment:
1,448
7,409
biofilters
(1) &
synthetic
turf field
73,200
39,704
7,140
14,276
4,069
n/a
% reduction:
27%
17%
41%
45%
14%
n/a
Figure 17.
TSS
Reduction
34%
Phosphorous
Reduction
27%
Volume
Reduction
(avg. annual)
13%
Volume
Reduction
(1st 1/2)
27%
0.1 miles
Figure 18.
RESIDENTIAL CLUSTER
Residential Cluster
The challenge for this area is sizing and locating
green infrastructure within a high density of
residential homes. 33% of the Residential
Cluster is comprised of roof surface area.
Green infrastructure elements modeled for this
area include rain barrels, rain gardens, permeable
pavements, soil amendments, and bioswales.
Bioswales are located adjacent to existing bus
stops and entrances into Pulaski Park and are
designed to capture and treat stormwater from
the adjacent W. Windlake Avenue. Given the
narrow terrace space within the City of Milwaukee
public right-of-way, bioswales have been shown
outside of the existing right-of-way within Pulaski
Park (Milwaukee County owned) where there is
greater space for larger-sized basins. Permeable
pavements are shown along all of the on-street
parking areas as well as in every public alley.
Alleys identified in orange have already been
funded by MMSD and the City of Milwaukee.
This project includes substantial community
engagement and implementation of permeable
green alleys in 2015. Porous sidewalks located
at the end of residential driveways have also
been modeled.
I N DUSTRIAL
D U S T R I A L SECT
SSEC
E C TTO
OR
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
Figure 19.
1 6 T H SSTT R E E T
CORRIDOR
Green infrastructure implementa on map for Residen al Cluster (Supplementary Solu on).
22
Building
Parking
Driveway
Sidewalk
Street
Alley
Landscape
Total Acres
57.82
19.79
1.95
0.46
2.67
9.68
2.94
20.34
19,200
4,600
1,300
300
1,000
7,500
2,300
2,200
rain
gardens
(150); rain
barrels
(150)
permeable
pavement
porous
sidewalk
permeable
pavement
& biofilter
(4)
permeable
pavement
GI treatment:
TSS
Reduction
9,900
4,000
400
290
1,300
1,707
1,000
% reduction:
48%
13%
69%
4%
83%
27%
62%
53
15
1.8
0.9
17.3
5.4
9.8
GI treatment:
2.4
rain
gardens
(150); rain
barrels
(150)
permeable
pavement
porous
sidewalk
31
13.2
0.5
0.8
% reduction:
41%
12%
71%
12%
3,640,000
1,975,900
154,000
36,800
GI treatment:
2.4
210,900
permeable
pavement
& biofilter
(4)
permeable
pavement
3.1
2.2
82%
63%
876,600
231,400
permeable
pavement
rain
gardens
(150); rain
barrels
(150)
permeable
pavement
porous
sidewalk
permeable
pavement
& biofilter
(4)
2,970,000
1,729,100
111,900
35,600
564,200
198,200
% reduction:
19%
12%
27%
4%
36%
25%
68,033
35,916
3,536
1,104
17,565
5,324
permeable
pavement
& biofilter
(4)
permeable
pavement
rain
gardens
(150); rain
barrels
(150)
GI treatment:
permeable
pavement
4,847
porous
sidewalk
34,179
28,570
846
% reduction:
50%
20%
100%
30%
100%
100%
Figure 20.
48%
Phosphorous
Reduction
9.8
152,800
41%
Volume
Reduction
(avg. annual)
19%
Volume
Reduction
(1st 1/2)
50%
December 2014 WinSLAMM table showing the dierent green infrastructure used to reduce the TSS,
phosphorus and volume within the Residen al Cluster zone.
23
R EESID
RESIDENTIAL
S I D E N T I A L CCLUSTER
LU S T E R
I N DUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
D U S T R I A L SECT
SSEC
SECTOR
E C TTO
OR
Figure 21.
16TH STREET
CORRIDOR
Green infrastructure implementa on map for 16th Street Corridor (Supplementary Solu on).
24
Building
Parking
Driveway
Sidewalk
Street
Alley
Landscape
Total Acres
20.14
2.37
0.97
0.33
1.14
3.39
11.94
7,600
500
600
4,400
1,200
rain
gardens
(10); rain
cisterns
(2); biofilter
permeable
pavement
permeable
pavement
& biofilters
biofilter;
synthetic
turf field
GI treatment:
3,700
400
200
1,500
900
% reduction:
51%
20%
67%
66%
25%
20
1.59
0.88
10.04
5.57
rain
gardens
(10); rain
cisterns
(2); biofilter
permeable
pavement
permeable
pavement
& biofilters
biofilter;
synthetic
turf field
GI treatment:
11
1.43
0.22
3.51
4.19
% reduction:
46%
10%
75%
65%
25%
820,000
209,200
76,600
306,400
87,600
rain
gardens
(10); rain
cisterns
(2); biofilter
permeable
pavement
permeable
pavement
& biofilters
biofilter;
synthetic
turf field
GI treatment:
570,000
187,500
48,600
152,400
65,500
% reduction:
30%
10%
37%
50%
25%
14,870
3,798
1,758
6,145
42,340
rain
gardens
(10); rain
cisterns
(2); biofilter
permeable
pavement
permeable
pavement
& biofilters
biofilter;
synthetic
turf field
GI treatment:
8,853
2,667
3,512
% reduction:
40%
30%
100%
43%
100%
Figure 22.
TSS
Reduction
51%
Phosphorous
Reduction
46%
Volume
Reduction
(avg. annual)
30%
Volume
Reduction
(1st 1/2)
40%
December 2014 WinSLAMM table showing the dierent green infrastructure used to reduce the TSS,
phosphorus and volume within the 16th Street Corridor zone.
25
Industrial Sector
The Industrial Sector contains a high quantity of
TSS, phosphorus, and stormwater volume, and is
thus included in the analysis of the overall project
area. While recommended green infrastructure
strategies including permeable
pavements,
bioswales and catch basins are shown in the
figure to the right, the individual industrial
property owners have not been engaged as
part of this planning process. Therefore, the
green infrastructure strategies shown are strictly
conceptual in nature and should be used as a
tool for future discussions with the appropriate
stakeholders.
R EESID
RESIDENTIAL
S I D E N T I A L CCLUSTER
LU S T E R
INDUSTRIAL SECTOR
Figure 23.
1 6 T H SSTT R E E T
CCO
CORRIDOR
ORRIDOR
Green infrastructure implementa on map for 16th Street Corridor (Supplementary Solu on).
26
Building
Parking
Driveway
Sidewalk
Street
Alley
Landscape
Total Acres
12.13
4.36
3.74
0.27
1.11
2.65
8,700
700
4,600
100
3,000
permeable
pavement;
biofilter;
catch
basins (2)
GI treatment:
4,100
2,500
500
53%
46%
83%
11
4.7
0.2
permeable
pavement;
biofilter;
catch
basins (2)
GI treatment:
3.5
2.6
0.6
44%
45%
83%
800,000
GI treatment:
294,600
21,300
100,500
permeable
pavement;
biofilter;
catch
basins (2)
permeable
pavement
680,000
196,300
72,400
% reduction:
15%
33%
28%
17,209
7,909
6,788
490
permeable
pavement;
biofilter;
catch
basins (2)
GI treatment:
2,022
permeable
pavement
12,003
3,604
% reduction:
30%
47%
100%
Figure 24.
53%
1.3
Phosphorous
Reduction
permeable
pavement
% reduction:
365,100
TSS
Reduction
permeable
pavement
% reduction:
1.5
300
44%
20,200
Volume
Reduction
(avg. annual)
15%
Volume
Reduction
(1st 1/2)
30%
December 2014 WinSLAMM table showing the dierent green infrastructure used to reduce the TSS,
phosphorus and volume within the Industrial Sector zone.
27
HABITAT
IMPROVEMENTS
AND STEWARDSHIP
Improving aquatic and terrestrial communities in Pulaski Park and along the river corridor will foster community engagement,
enhance the physical landscape and impact the health of the river. Habitat improvements aesthetically enrich greenspaces
and draw people to a welcoming, comfortable, and beautiful greenspace.
Implementation of the recommendations listed below will:
1. Stabilize soil to minimize erosion and sediment entering the KK River.
2.
Hold water in place for evaporation, transpiration, allow for natural absorption, and reduce flooding and
stormwater runoff.
3.
Lessen the urban heat island effect and allow waterways to retain more oxygen.
4.
Milwaukee County Parks creating an adaptive restoration and management plan with input from the community and
community partners. This would include a site description, goals, objectives, a community vision map and an iterative
process for long-term monitoring and management.
Establishing areas open to the community for permaculture harvesting (fruit and nut trees, berries) in underutilized
areas (e.g. tennis courts).
Removing problem exotic plant species such as Common Buckthorn, Teasel, Garlic Mustard and replace with
water-loving and soil-stabilizing native species (willow, birch, sedges, forbs).
Planting a line of mixed native stormwater trees (Red Maple, Silver Maple, Yellow Birch, Swamp White Oak) along the
river corridor south of W. Cleveland Avenue.
Creating access to natural areas by extending the Kinnickinnic River Trail through existing forest sections on the west
side of the river, with clear points of access to the river for activities such as fishing and environmental education.
Engaging community in green infrastructure design and development through a unique iterative process with partners
(landscape architects, policy makers, land owners).
Conducting stewardship and citizen science events to bring users into the park and provide hands-on learning
experiences (e.g. environmental education, Bio-blitzes, river clean-ups, planting days).
Incorporating bilingual signage that explains habitat improvements and green infrastructure.
28
TRIPLE BOTTOM
LINE IMPACT
Figure 25.
Increased resilience to climate change impacts such as heavier rainfalls, hotter temperatures, and higher storm surges
Improved public health from reduced air pollution and increased physical activity
Figure 26.
Note: The Pulaski Park opportunities were identified through project team meetings, community meetings, events, informal
conversations and importantly, as a result of survey administration in the community. More information on the process and
specific data can be found in Appendix B.
1
30
Neighborhood Opportunities
Public art
Seating areas
Educational signage
Figure 29.
Figure 27.
Figure 28.
Skate park
Futsal court
Citizen science
Community gardens
Figure 31.
32
Figure 30.
Figure 32.
ECONOMIC IMPACT
Green infrastructure can save money compared to traditional grey infrastructure because it can help sewers function better.
Specific to the Pulaski Park Neighborhood, benefits that can be leveraged or added include access to home improvement
resources and attracting investments. The Pulaski Park Targeted Investment Neighborhood is a designation from the City of
Milwaukee that allows residents to apply for no interest, partially forgivable home repair loans. Repair costs could include new
gutter systems that disconnect from the storm sewers and energy and water efficient appliances.
MMSD has identified and quantified how large scale implementation of green infrastructure in their service area can substantially
affect the triple bottom line. Below are estimates of how the large scale implementation of green infrastructure is expected to
have an impact in the greater Milwaukee area. Although the scale of this impact will be substantially less in the Pulaski Park
Neighborhood, the areas for impact will be similar to those listed below.
Infrastructure Savings: Green infrastructure saves $44 million in infrastructure costs in the combined sewer service area
compared to constructing more Deep Tunnel storage. Achieving the goal of the first half inch of capture in any given storm
using green infrastructure will reduce basement backups and sewer overflows.
Green Job Opportunities: Green infrastructure develops over 500 green maintenance jobs at full implementation and 160
construction jobs on average each year.
Property Values: Green infrastructure increases property values by an estimated $447 million throughout the MMSD
planning area. Strategies such as rain gardens and stormwater trees can increase property values because of the aesthetic
enhancement they provide to a neighborhood.
Figure 33.
33
CONCLUSION
The project team approached this planning effort with a goal of reaching two bold performance standards that when achieved,
would change the Kinnickinnic River, watershed, and surrounding community for generations. Through months of discussion
and computer modeling, it was concluded that achieving those performance standards would require substantial investments
and considerable changes to the built and natural environments. In cities covered in concrete, managing stormwater is a
challenge faced by municipalities all over the country. This plan has demonstrated that it is crucial for partners to begin
discussions, coordinate efforts, and build consensus around goals and strategies as early as possible in order to get the most
out of investments. The implementation of this plan at all scales will move that needle in the right direction. The projects that
have resulted as part of early implementation are telling of the dedication of partners and support from the community.
Achieving the full build out of recommendations listed in this plan will require continued partnership and the development of
creative implementation and funding strategies. By developing the plan with input from an array of stakeholders at every step
of the way, the process has ensured that implementation of this plan will result in streamlined impactful projects, considerate
use of resources, and include triple bottom line outcomes.
Future generations will have a more resilient community because of the foresight and collaboration of forward thinking partners.
Figure 34.
APPENDIX A:
PULASKI PARK
BUILDING ASSESSMENT
Bathhouse/Pavilion Comfort Station
The Bathhouse/Pavilion structure was built in 1915. The
Comfort Station as it has been called, is in great need
of improvements and upgrades to meet the needs of the
community. The structure presents a great opportunity
to operate as a hub for the neighborhood surrounding
Pulaski Park. This is particularly crucial, as there no other
public green spaces to utilize for community education and
meetings, as well as public and private social gatherings.
Figure 35.
Figure 36.
Splash Pad
This feature, adjacent to the Pulaski Pool building, is
currently non-functioning. Expansion plans for the building
show the new addition being added to the south side of the
existing building and no replacement of the current, nonfunctioning splash pad.
Tennis Courts
Built in 1955 with few recent upgrades, these two tennis
courts measuring approximately 120 x 98 feet are in great
need of repair or replacement with community desires
for other recreational activities. Green space not being
utilized for sport courts could be used for implementation
of green infrastructure elements such as bio-filtration
basins.
Tot Lot/Playground
The park a playground just north of the KK River and
adjacent to the basketball courts is relatively new and
is currently in good condition. Given the playgrounds
proximity to the KK River and the plans slated for
reconstruction of the river to widen the floodplain,
relocation of this playground may be required.
Outdoor Fitness Station
Just to the south of the Pulaski Park Pool Building is an
underutilized fitness station. The facility is constructed
of wood materials and has seen decay and deterioration
after years of use.
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT
Green Space
The park features a significant amount of green space
with undulating topography that slopes to the KK River.
Areas of the park not in use for recreation could be used
to create rain gardens and bio-filtration basins to slow and
reduce the amount of water running into the river. These
features could contribute to increasing the scenic beauty
of the park and reduce upkeep of grass in many areas of
the park.
Park Facilities
Upper Field (corner of W Cleveland Ave.& S 16th St.)
The area is primarily used as a playfield for soccer. The
borders of the area could be sites for bio-filtration basins,
as the river is downhill from the field. Reconstruction of
the actual playfield itself using artificial turf is another
option to reduce the amount of maintenance and increase
the aesthetic nature of the field.
Basketball Court
Built in 1970 and renovated in 2011, this concrete pad
court is in good condition and features two hoops and
modern lighting.
Restrooms
Publicly available restrooms are currently housed in
the Pulaski Pool building. The pavilion is also host to
restrooms. However, the facilities in the pavilion are
currently closed to the public due to the dire need for
upgrades. Improvements to the restrooms could be an
opportunity to utilize grey water to further the communitys
desired environmental performance and decrease the
water runoff into the river, just south of the pavilion.
Figure 37.
36
Paved Surfaces
Sidewalks
There are approximately 7,053 linear feet of sidewalks in Pulaski Park (not including the sidewalks located within the street
public rights-of-way). Of these, 726 feet of the sidewalks are part of the nine staircases in the area of the park north of W.
Cleveland Avenue. Sidewalks in Pulaski Park range in condition and many are in great need of repair and/or replacement.
The Kinnickinnic River bisects the northern end of the park and elevations increase north and south of the river. This changing
elevation throughout the park necessitates stepped sidewalks in several areas of the park. These staircases are in need for
repair or replacement. These repairs will be significant, as entrances on the east and west ends of the park require staircase
use, in addition to use within to access many park facilities and amenities require the use of these stairs.
In general, the sidewalks around the Pulaski Pool are in relatively good condition. The only exception is the sidewalk along the
east side of the building, which needs to be replaced or mud-jacked.
Pedestrian Bridge
Built in 1965, this concrete structure that connects the north and south sides of the park is in need for an upgrade. With the
reconstruction of the Kinnickinnic River, this bridge will eventually be removed and most likely be replaced as a result of the
MMSD Flood Management Project.
Parking
Pulaski Park features one parking area with the capacity of 24 spaces, just south of W. Cleveland Avenue and north of the
pool structure. Overflow parking is available on adjacent city streets. The parking lot is currently in poor condition, with multiple
potholes developing around storm inlets, as well as a circular staining and cracking pattern near the loading dock. This area
is in great need of repair or replacement and the possibility of adding additional stalls has been identified as part of the study.
The repair and/or addition of new parking spaces creates the opportunity to combine improvements with green infrastructure
elements such as permeable pavement or bio-filtration basins adjacent to the parking lot.
Figure 38.
Figure 39.
37
Figure 40.
APPENDIX B:
PULASKI PARK
SURVEY RESULTS
In the spring of 2014 the Milwaukee County Parks staff undertook a strategic planning effort for the parks system for 20152020. In an effort to better understand how residents use the parks at large, a Parks Use and Interest Survey was developed
for residents to provide input online and during open house meetings. Because of the breadth of the survey, data for individual
parks and associated responses were not available. SSCHC worked with County Parks staff to develop a more specific
survey where survey results would be integrated into the larger strategic planning effort but also help identify needs and
opportunities as they relate to Pulaski Park. The survey and associated responses were developed specifically for Pulaski
Park in order to understand current use and future opportunities.
Because the majority of Pulaski Park Neighborhood residents prefer to be communicated with via mail or in person, SSCHC
staff and volunteers administered surveys through community events and via door-to-door. In total, 125 bilingual surveys were
completed and placed partners in a better position to understand how the community uses the park, future opportunities as
well as more qualitative information that was generated through an open ended prompt asking for additional comments. Many
of these comments centered around perceptions of crime and safety in the park which is in line with comments received from
the neighborhood at large. The projects and programs that are anticipated to be implemented as part of realizing the Pulaski
Park Neighborhood Stormwater Plan will bring more users into the park, promote positive use of the space, and enhance
aesthetics which can all lead to lower crime rates (or perception of crime).
In addition to the survey data listed on pages 40 and 41, residents also added the following statements when being interviewed.
Years ago it was nice having parties at the pavilion because the kids could go
outside and play during the party.
Please keep up with basic maintenance with litter, graffiti, weeds, and lights.
39
40
TYPES OF PLAYGROUNDS
Residents would like to continue to
see family-friendly amenities like the
playground. Large support exists
for safe and visible designated play
areas such as rubber surfaces,
fenced playgrounds or a kiddie
pool. Neighbors cite the lack of
tennis users as an opportunity to
re-imagine the tennis courts as a kid
zone.
41
APPENDIX C:
REGULATORY RELIEF
and INCENTIVIZING
GREEN
INFRASTRUCTURE
Regulatory Relief for Municipalities
Stormwater is primarily regulated through a permitting program called the Wisconsin Pollution Discharge Elimination System
(WPDES). The WPDES Stormwater Program regulates stormwater discharges from three potential sources: municipal
separate storm sewer systems (MS4s), construction activities, and industrial activities. Additionally, permits for combined
sewer system operators may contain stormwater requirements aimed at reducing overflow events.
The permits issued pursuant to the WPDES program are designed to prevent stormwater runoff from washing harmful
pollutants into local surface waters such as streams, rivers, and lakes. This is accomplished primarily through the use of best
management practices, which are techniques, measures or structural controls used to manage the quantity and improve the
quality of stormwater runoff. In addition, MS4 permitees (City of Milwaukee and Milwaukee County) are required to take a
number of additional actions including public outreach and sewer leak detection.
The upcoming Milwaukee River Basin TMDL may also impose requirements beyond what is currently in most stormwater
permits. The TMDL will set pollutant reduction targets and individual regulated entities will be required as part of their permits
to develop a plan to meet the targets. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources recently-released TMDL Guidance
for MS4 permits outlines the process through which the reduction targets will be incorporated into MS4 permits, and how and
when the permitees will be expected to meet their targets. The permitees will be given a period of time to plan after which
they will be expected to implement controls and other measures to continually reduce their stormwater discharges until their
target is met.
Based on the WinSLAMM outputs as part of this plan, collaboration between partners in managing stormwater is a more
effective approach then single land owner projects based on opportunity (both in terms of stormwater quantity and quality and
from a financial standpoint). This plan demonstrates how collaboration can help stakeholders reach their regulatory goals and
leverage investments for additional social and economic opportunities.
Unfortunately, stormwater management regulations are not designed to foster a collaborative and holistic management
approach. As mentioned above, different types of regulated entitiesMS4 operators, combined sewer system operators,
and industrial facilitiesare regulated under different types of permits and are subject to different stormwater management
requirements. This becomes especially difficult to negotiate if a project demonstrates that the most effective way to manage
stormwater runoff is to capture the runoff from Land Owner A and treat it on Land Owner Bs property. The question becomes,
who gets the credit and how much?
The Pulaski Park Neighborhood Stormwater Plan, through its place-based approach to stormwater management, presents
a unique opportunity to address certain regulatory shortcomings by laying out a comprehensive implementation plan that
can support and adapt to the regulatory framework to foster a more collaborative approach to stormwater management.
Additionally, the project team has partnered with the Southeastern Wisconsin Watersheds Trust to explore ways beyond the
development of this plan in which the regulatory framework can be adapted to leverage participation and funding among the
different entities within the project area.
42
43
Questions? Contact:
Nadia Bogue
Environmental Projects Coordinator
Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers
nadia.bogue@sschc.org
414-385-3749