Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Samuel C. Ugbolue , Yong K. Kim , Steven B. Warner , Qinguo Fan , ChenLu Yang ,
c
To cite this article: Samuel C. Ugbolue, Yong K. Kim, Steven B. Warner, Qinguo Fan, ChenLu Yang, Olena Kyzymchuk, Yani
Feng & John Lord (2011): The formation and performance of auxetic textiles. Part II: geometry and structural properties,
Journal of The Textile Institute, 102:5, 424-433
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2010.486183
The formation and performance of auxetic textiles. Part II: geometry and structural
properties
Samuel C. Ugboluea*, Yong K. Kima, Steven B. Warnera, Qinguo Fana, Chen-Lu Yangb, Olena Kyzymchukc,
Yani Fenga and John Lorda
a
Department of Materials and Textiles, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth (UmassD), MA 02747, USA;
Advanced Technology and Manufacturing Center, UmassD, MA 02747, USA; cDepartment of Knitting Technology, Kiev
National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine
(Received 19 November 2009; final version received 9 April 2010 )
10.1080/00405000.2010.486183
Some exceptional materials become fatter when stretched and are described as auxetics or having negative Poissons
ratio. Auxetic textiles belong to this class of extraordinary materials that are increasingly attaining some prominence
in many applications of technical textiles. We have sustained the efforts to fabricate auxetic fabric structures based
on non-auxetic yarns. The focus is to combine our knowledge of geometry and fabric structural characteristics to
engineer auxetic textiles and to determine the properties of such auxetic textile fabrics. To realize our objective, we
designed and investigated hexagonal knit structures as auxetic textiles offering optimum performance. The factors
that influence Poissons ratio are identified as yarn type, number of chain courses and strain level. Also, a method
has been developed for quantifying the geometrical structural unit cell of the auxetic structure based on measured
parameters, namely a1, a2, b1, b2, h and c, as detailed in this paper.
Keywords: auxetic textiles; negative Poissons ratio; warp knitting; fabric geometry; structural properties
Introduction
In Part l of this series of papers (Ugbolue et al., 2010),
we presented the theoretical and technical considerations
for fabricating auxetic textile structures. Generally, when
a material is stretched, it becomes longer in the direction
in which the load is applied but narrower in the transverse
direction. Some exceptional materials become fatter
when stretched and are described as auxetics or having
negative Poissons ratio. Auxetic textiles belong to this
class of extraordinary materials that are increasingly
attaining some prominence in many applications of technical textiles (Alderson & Alderson, 2005). Efforts to
fabricate auxetic structures are limited (Gaspar, Ran,
Smith, Grima, & Evans, 2005; McMullan, Kumar, &
Griffin, 2006; Mouritz, Bannister, Falson, & Leong,
1999; Ravirala, Alderson, Davies, Simkins, & Alderson,
2006; Smith, Grima, & Evans, 2000). Based on reported
results, the best structure for auxetic textile production
derives from the warp knitting technology (Ugbolue,
Warner, Kim, Fan, & Yang, 2006; Ugbolue et al., 2007,
2008, 2009, 2010).
The non-auxetic samples are produced by two guide
bars and the knitted structure is hexagonal, as shown in
Figure 1. The knitted fabric structure is formed from only
one type of yarn using a partial set drawing-in of the
*Corresponding author. Email: sugbolue@umassd.edu
ISSN 0040-5000 print/ISSN 1754-2340 online
Copyright 2011 The Textile Institute
DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2010.486183
http://www.informaworld.com
Figure 1.
Non-auxetic structure.
Figure 2.
Auxetic structure.
Figure 2.
425
Non-auxetic structure.
Figure 3.
Auxetic structure.
Experimental
Production of warp-knit fabrics
To enable us to undertake the detailed study of nonauxetic and auxetic knit structures produced from nonTable 1.
Fabric
designation
3C-1
3C-2
3C-3
5C-1
5C-2
5C-3
7C-1
7C-2
7C-3-
Number of
tricot courses
Number of
chain courses
Loop length
(mm)
Stitch density
(loops/in2)
Stitch density
(loops/cm2)
Basis weight
(g/m2)
3
3
3
5
5
5
7
7
7
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
6.52
6.35
6.79
6.63
6.70
6.42
6.71
6.28
6.60
83.4
71.6
62.7
82.1
67.7
58.8
76.6
65.8
54.2
12.9
11.1
9.7
12.7
10.5
9.1
11.9
10.2
8.4
97.91
83.70
76.61
99.00
80.80
70.35
84.78
70.85
57.04
426
and 5.08 cm (2 in/min), respectively, and in the coursewise direction, the values were 2.54 cm (1 in) and 2.54
cm (1 in/min), respectively. The test process was
observed with a Sensicam QE camera. The camera took
pictures of the displacement of the sample as it was
stretched and the data were captured using the Sensicamera control software. Three specimens were tested
for each structure, and 55 pictures were taken for each
specimen. The displacement perpendicular to the test
direction was obtained using the Photoshop software.
All the samples were tested along the y-direction.
Poissons ratio was calculated using the equation,
v xy =
x
y
Figure 3.
Table 2.
Nw = 31.8 + 1.3nt
2.9nc
Nc = 169.9 + 9.1nc
Nw = 32.2 + nt 3.1nc
t = 0.90 0.06
ms = 140.5 + 44.6nt
21.1nc 5.3nt2
t = 0.96 0.02
ms = 226.6 25.1nc
Nc = 108.4 + 7.5nt
+ 32.8nc 3.8ntnc
t = 0.93 0.01
ms = 172.5 + 10.2nt
5.9nc 3.8ntnc
Type of inlay
and yarn denier
427
No inlay yarn
B-70 den
Spandex
a1
a1 = 0.33 + 1.54nt
a1 = 2.36 + 0.69nt
a1 = 1.99 + 0.59nt
a2
a2 = 1.24 + 1.22nc
a1 = 1.02 + 0.65nt
+ 0.78nc
a2 = 2.78 + 0.60nc
a2 = 2.22 + 0.67nc
a2 = 2.64 + 0.87nc
a2 = 2.2 + 0.76nc
b1
1.80 0.04
2.21 0.17
2.28 0.13
2.04 0.14
2.11 0.12
b2
1.16 0.07
h = 0.93 + 1.15nt +
0.81nc + 0.25ntnc
c = 4.12 + 1.11nc
h = 1.33 + 0.43nt
h = 1.05 + 0.41nt
c = 5.08 + 1.02nc
h = 3.04 + 2.54nt
0.218nt2
c = 4.24 + 1.27nc
Poissons ratio
0.54
0.57
0.57
0.55
0.54
c = 10.46 2.50nt
+ 1.12nc + 0.25nt2
Coursewise direction
7X-1B
Strain %
1.40
2.79
8.37
27. 90
Poissons ratio
0.17
0.15
0.07
0.08
Strain %
2.23
31.21
49.05
89.20
Poissons ratio
0.64
0.05
0.02
0.07
7X-2B
Strain %
2.75
4.12
57.67
68.66
Poissons ratio
0.22
0.26
0.05
0.03
Strain %
2.03
16.27
22.37
120.00
Poissons ratio
0.60
0.07
0.02
0.08
7X-3B
Strain %
4.12
5.49
65.91
Poissons ratio
0.24
0.22
0.01
Strain %
2.03
6.10
113. 90
Poissons ratio
0.86
0.66
0.05
0.0
120.00
0.06
74.15
428
Figure 4. Plot of Poissons ratio against strain % for auxetic structures (a) type A, walewise direction, and (b) type A, walewise
direction, at low strain levels.
429
Figure 5. Plot of Poissons ratio against strain % for auxetic structures (a) type B, walewise direction, and (b) type B, walewise
direction, at low strain levels.
430
Figure 6. Plot of Poissons ratio against strain % (a) for 7X-1B, 7X-2B and 7X-3B in the two directions of deformation, and (b)
for 7X-1B, 7X-2B, and 7X-3B at low strain levels.
Figure 6.
4.
5.
Table 6.
Tensile test results of auxetic fabrics in the walewise and coursewise directions.
Walewise direction
Coursewise direction
Figure 7.
431
Fabric designation
Load (N)
Strain %
Modulus (MPa)
7X-1B
7X-2B
7X-3B
7X-1B
7X-2B
7X-3B
128.89
150.57
142.35
105.98
69.81
111.96
271.87
303.79
290.94
196.97
195.16
256.22
87.90
106.58
106.78
61.83
55.34
49.86
Loadelongation curve for 7X-1B in the (a) walewise direction, and (b) coursewise direction.
432
Figure 8.
Loadelongation curve for 7X-2B in the (a) walewise direction and (b) coursewise direction.
Figure 9.
Loadelongation curve for 7X-3B in the (a) walewise direction, and (b) coursewise direction.
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful for the funds received from the
National Textile Center under the US Department of
Commerce Grant No. 02-07400 in support of this research.
References
Alderson, A., & Alderson, K. (2005). Expanding materials
and applications: Exploiting auxetic textiles. Technical
Textiles International, 777, 2934.
ASTM D503495. (2001). Standard Test Method for breaking strength and elongation of textile fabrics (grab test).
In Annual book of ASTM standards, vol 7.02 textiles
(11). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Feng, Y. (2009). The formation and performance of auxetic
warp knit structures. Unpublished MS thesis, University
of Massachusetts, Dartmouth.
Gaspar, N., Ran, X.J., Smith, C.W., Grima, J.N., & Evans,
K.E. (2005). Novel honeycombs with auxetic behaviour.
Acta Materiala, 53, 24392445.
McMullan, P.J., Kumar, S., & Griffin, A.C. (2006). Textile
fibers engineered from molecular auxetic polymers
(NTC project M04-GT21, Annual Report). Philadelphia:
National Textile Center.
Mouritz, A., Bannister, M., Falson, P., & Leong, K. (1999).
Review of applications for advanced three dimensional
fibre textile composites. Composites. Part A: Applied
Science and Manufacturing, 30, 14451461.
Ravirala, N., Alderson, K., Davies, P., Simkins, V., &
Alderson, A. (2006), Negative Poissons ratio polyester
fibers. Textile Research Journal, 76(7), 540546.
433