Blast Door Calculation

0
ENGINEERING STUDY OF
BLAST-RESISTANT DOORS
Submitted to
U. S. CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Protective Construction Branch
Contract No. DA-49-129-ENG-434
Li
....
MAY 27' S
by
Charles D. Price
Mosler Safe Co.
30 November 1960
Reproduced by the
CLEARINGHOUSE
for Federal Scientific & Technical
Information Sprifigheld Va 22151
,
-.
//6)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Synopsis. .
Section I -Scope
Section II
of Work.
. .
......
1
2
. .
...
Design Calculations. .
16
Section V -Bibliography ...........
I,
Comparison of Door Designs

and Final Door Design
Selections
Section IV
Review of Existing Blast

Doors Studied. . . . . . .
Section III
22
33
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND TABLES

Figure
Number
I-i
1-2
1-3
1-4
II-I
11-2
11-3
11-4
11-5
III-1
111-2
111-3
111-4
IV-I
IV-2
IV-3
IV-4
IV-5
IV-6
IV7
IV-8
Page
Description
Pressure-Time Curve, 25 psi
Standard OCE Blast Doors
Mosle. C-10 Door Before & After Nuclear Blast
C-10 Door Open Before Blast
C-10 -'xult Interior Before Blast
C-10 Door After Nuclear Blast
C-10 Door Opened After Nuclear Blast
6'x7' Double Leaf, 100 psi Blast Door
6 1 x7' Double Leaf, 100 psi Blast Door
3'-6" x 7-0 ' Single Leaf, 100 psi Blast Door
3'-6" x 7'-0" Single Leaf, 100 psi Blast Door
Calculations for 3'-6" x 7'-0" 25 psi Blast Door
Calculations for 3L6" x 7t-0", 50 psi Blast Door
Calculations for 14'-0" x 18'-0" 50psi Blast Door
Calculations for 2'-6" x 4'-0" 100 psi Blast Door
Derivation of Constant K. Factor
Derivation of Rel 1 Xel'i-d
K for Partially
Loaded Span
Derivation of Re,
X
and K for Built-up
Cons cruction el
el,
Derivation of R
and X
for Solid Steel Plate
el
el
b-
I2-
4
5
6
7
11
12
13
14
15
18
19
20
21
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
25d
26t
27s
28t
NOMENCLATURE
DLF
Dynamic Load Factor (to convert a given dynamic load to

an equivalent static load)
Modulus of elasticity (psi)
dy
Dynamic yield strength of steel (psi)
Moment of inertia (inches4 )
KL
Load factor
KM
Mass factor
K!M
Load mass factor
Spring factor (kips/foot)
Bending moment (inch-pounds)
Reflected shock wave overpressure (psig)
Overpressure (psig)
3
SO
Section modulus (inches 3 )
Time of idealized triangular load (seconds)
Tn
Natural period of oscillation (seconds)
Time in seconds
Positive phase duration (seconds)
Shock front velocity (feet per second)
This Document Contains

Missing Page/s That Are
Unavailable In The
Original Document
BEST
AVAILABLE COPY
SYNOPSIS
This final report is the nuclear-blast-resistant door
section of a study, which also includes blast valve closures,
under Contract DA-49-129-ENG-434 with the Protective Construction
Branch, U. S. Corps of Engineers, Washington, D. C.
Blast valve
closures were covered in a separate report. (1)

The purpose of this report is-to evaluate various existing
blast-resistant door designs and then to select the optimum door
designs for the door sizes, types, and blast pressure ratings
specified in the contract, taking into consideration economy,
ease of manufacture from standard available materials, reliability
of operation, and a minimum amount of maintenance.
From the optimum door designs complete drawings and specifications were prepared suitable for competitive bidding and manufacture.
This report summarizes the results of the Interim Blast Door
Study (2) which included detailed preliminary design calculations,
sketches, and comparisons.
.11
SECTION I -SCOPE
OF WORK
The criteria specifies 25, 50, and 100 psi overpressures

(see Figures I-I, 1-2, and 1-3, which are compiled from item 3 in
.
Bibliography), with full reflected pressures to be withstood
elasto-plastically by the doors, which are to be operable after

three blasts under conditions of moisture and extremes of temperature with a minimum of maintenance.
The door sizes and types to be considered are as follows
(see Figure 1-4):
A.
Pedestrian door 3'-6" wide x 7'-0" high, single-leaf,

side-hinged
B.
Pedestrian door 6'-0" wide x 7'-0" high, double-leaf,

side-hinged
C.
D.
Vehicular door 8'-0" x 8'-0", double-leaf, side-hinged

Vehicular door 12'-0" x 12'-0", single- and double-leaf,
sliding
E.
Rail and truck door 14'-0" wide x 18'-0" high, singleleaf, sliding
F.
Hatch door 3'-0" x 3'-0", single-leaf, side-hinged,

suitable for horizontal or vertical mounting
G.
Service tunnel door 2'-6" wide x 4'-0" high, singleleaf,- hinged
Door sizes mentioned above are clear opening sizes.

12'-0" x
12
'-0",
The
25 psi rating, double-leaf, sliding door is
powered by a manually operated hand chain geared trolley.
The
12'-0" x 12'-0", 50 and 100 psi rating, s:ngle-leaf sliding doors,

and the 14'-0" x 181-01,
25,
50, and l00 psi rating, single-leaf
sliding doors are powered by electric motor drives with an emergency

manual handwheel drive.
The remainder of the doors are manually opened and shut,

either single or double-leaf.
By using bank-vault-door type
three-way adjustable hinges, the door leaves are easily opened

and shut by one person with just a few pounds pull on the door
handle, even though the door leaf may weigh 5 tons or more.
The doors were designed complete with frame and hardware.
Doors and frames (except for sliding doors) were designed as
integral units.
The frames are of a one-piece box construction.
The doors are designed to be mounted in the door frames, adjusted

and operated at the factory, and shipped'together as one unit,
thus insuring proper fit and operation on the job.
Doors are also designed to resist a 25% maximum rebound
force, except where calculations indicate a greater percentage,
in which case the calculated figure is used.
The rebound force
is taken care of by a bank-vault-door type locking bolt mechanism.
-~---*-----r-
-- 1
~~~~~*1~~*~~
--
.1
~**'EV?
i~li1 ~
~i4;4 17'
I
'I
7717.
1 T.
I.I.4
-i
I-
~q
iIi~iK__
24-
qt~.
t~Th
lqj
'I
.1
-~
-~
II-..-----I
I,
-7-
.-
+Tfl7KT7
i-Il
-.
*
-~
*
-
I
-
-I
---
H
-%
___
'~I
~w~Iz9
-7
~*j-~
-.
-----
,-w9r7WYY
--
A)f7
AOKI
-:~-7?
____
~?4&~
Ilk
NI
-,--1
7,
..
i-
....
- I'
. . ..
..
- -----
7-.N
. I
...
'
ii
4w
---
__
_-
(:I
Ik.$i.
. .I . ..
__.,.
..
"
...
...
. _
_
. __
'
..
II
---.
! ....
,--- . ...
..-----
. .
-I
"
"
- -,
,
_
'-
1
-
--
---.
...
_ -
"
IL
r4".
wi
*-
*-
Ii
4.. 4..
, I--
">
----
...
.--
~
-
---
4-I-
4.
L.
Ila,
,
|
.......
. . ........
.i+ I
,...
"
'
-j-
~-I
if
-.
L 4
,
*T.
n
.
* iiiJ:
'
II
Tt.
-
ti.~VI
I~1
Z--a -V0 o
5,
-z-
b Ts
5i-Pf
PS2r
-4 .:d 15 PS
_
IZ. :~o
',!O
00
PSL IA
0001kO . '
l'in!
OPI3
4-4-
FL
157F
p~~R
3 101 0
100 P45 1 j53 6b
Eji~R
ZDj4-5E
kHT
HIP~k
B~~
10
ojT
ULL E~x
**
-J,;IEV4
,o~
-8
-2I
1r
PRESSURE
'D
%4T
100
51
P1
-7
8-.5Z
~4
Z(-
0A/1~~Iz
B64Z
ZS
S_
10
soO7-
3O~
6-0, X7-
_____
50 P S I0? lI4-0,40
x-7-0-
r-
30
P'6I
01
it
W71
11
101t0
,-
A. B~~1 C.-
50
:4
00-S
I-
i F
1714
i
m~
ol 5~
-oIi-'4
i.
s*
rozJ,4I
__
V4EIV
~TOVRP
1
SD
~zI4Iuc~s-
_____
z~6
L!_
Izb
1411
0B05
44
-as
.N
I- -
I
-
o p//
'I
2-
-I,-
1 1
I CIv
00P
-'1Z06-
*6
41
-OV/1VO5'71:
"o1
4-
-i
B-'r
-r
-c
s-oZ
PS 11314J135~ 4
(00-
31000
I~~
300
A.400
S*OOo
'2
'-1
_;__
8-0 it0 Z5 9.5' 1 *I 41

8-0n-8-0 1 50 P5 i j50
Lo_
_C P56
415
l.3
'ir
ZBUS I-IN
U_
--- 7t,
ti ,
134411
'
____14_1a,_
'lb 6
I A-
7_5
.'4
-I
.07
00PS1 4
T- 21O ,
'"
xIsU zp
'4:~I
-"5 -aP X 1
-4-*l8-roo
Si
.I,4
'
1dKo
t
Z
-l-1
Z4d~
12
41 ' T- h .C!1-C6
It
z~l-.F1714
o3
MA
_________i
-IL
4-
j i%-
r--
1-
b"'4-503~
100
SECTION II
REVIEW OF EXISTING ELAST DOORS STUDIED
Rath:er than a detailed list of all door drawings available

for study (which would be unduly voluminous), a representative
cross-section of various doors is presented.
Description
Drawing
Ammann & Whitney
60-02-058, Sheet W18
5'-4" x 7'-2" opening
Constructed of 8" channel and beams

running short way of door with 3/8"
outer plate and 1/4" back plate.
Side-hinged
3 side hinges, 3 separate manual

latches, and rubber gasket.
Ammann & Whitney

60-02-58, Sheet #17
Constructed of 14" @ 43 WF beams running

long way of door with 3/8" outer plate
10'-0" x 14'-0"
sliding door
and 1/4" back plate. Runs on three

2-ton trolleys. Sealing gasket and
turnbuckle anchor dogs.
Ammann & Whitney

Sheet #1 & Sheet #2
61-01 x 8'-0"
Constructed of 8" thick solid steel

plate. Moved on double flanged wheels
on bottom of door. Sliding door.
Black & Veatch

33-15-58, Sheet #9
12'-0" x 12'-0"
Double sliding door
Constructed of 12" "I" beams running

long way. 9/16" thick steel plates
front and back. Runs on trolleys.
3/16" x 1-1/2" rubber-impregnated canvas
belting for seals.
Black & Veatch

33-03-15, Sheet #8
V-0" x 6'-8"
Constructed of 4" channels running short

way of door with 3/8" thick steel plates
front and back. Spring bronze seals.
Side hinged door.
Black & Veatch

33-03-15, Sheet
8'-0" x 8'-0"
Constructed of 6" "I" beams running

long way with 5/8" thick steel plates
front and back. Spring bronze seals.
Double-leaf, side-hinged door.
T
Description
Drawing
Lorenzo S. Winslow
49-100-9
31-0" x 6'-6"
Side-hinged
Constructed of structural tees, ST 5 I's

running short oay and ST 5 B's running
long way, with 7116" thick steel outer
plate and 1/4" thick steel back plate.
Lorenzo S. Winslow
49-100-9
41-8" x 6'-6"
Side-hinged
Double door, constructed of structural

tees, ST 5 I's running long way and
5" x 1-1/8" bars running short way, with
1/2" thick steel outer plate and 1/4"
thick steel back plate.
Leo A. Daly
A-11
7'-9" high
Single- and Doubleleaf, side-hinged
Constructed of 1/4" thick steel plate

with 3" x 2" x 1/4" angle frame, with
canvas-covered rubber gasket and refrigerator type handle and latch.
General Services
Administration
49-100-9
V-8-1/2" x 6'-7-1/8"
Side-hinged
6-11/16" thick door consists of structural tees, ST 6 I's running short way
and ST 6 B's running long way, with 6"
channel outer frame, with 7/16" thick
steel outer plate and 1/4" thick steel
back plate.
General Services
Administration
49-100-9
21-81 x 6'-7"
Side-hinged
5-11/16" thick door consists of structural tees, ST 5 I's running short way
and ST 5 B's running long way, with 5"
channel outer frame, with 7/16" thick
steel outer plate and 1/4" thick steel
back plate.
Faulkner, Kingsbury,
& Stenhouse
13 various size doors consisting of 5/8"

or 7/8" thick solid steel plate on outer
or hinge side and an outside frame of
3-1/2" x I" steel bar with a 1/8" steel
back cover plate.
Daniel, Mann, Johnson

& Mendenhall &
Associates
AP-1511/16
5'-0"
7-0"
2" thick curved steel plate, sidehinged door.
I
9
From the preceding simmary of existing door designs, the

following generalities are obtained:
1. Large doors are of built-up construction with a heavy
front and back steel plate, with structural steel beams
between the plates.
2. Built-up-constructicn doors feature more one-way construction than two-way construction. On double-leaf doors
the one-way construction runs the long way of the door due
to the one edge of the door being unsupported.
3. Built-up-construction doors with two-way reinforcement
feature a "tee" beam reinforcement, which allows the leg of
the tee to be welded to one plate and the other plate to be
slotted and welded to the flange of the tee from the outside,
overcoming what would otherwise be a fabrication problem.
Two-way reinforcement is very much in the minority, however.
4. Small or medium strength and size doors might be made of
a solid steel plate as well as of a built-up fabrication.
There is a wide variety of hinges and latching devices,
5.
practically none of which appear adequate and capable of
withstanding significant rebound forces.
6. Little progress has been made in the design of doors
departing from conventional designs, such as curved doors
or prestressed concrete doors.'
Of considerable interest, in addition to the above-mentioned
doors, is a particular door design which was successfully tested
in 1957 in "Operation Plumbbob" at the Nevada Test Site under very
high pressures.
This was a standard bank vault door, a Mosler
Safe Co. C-10 door.
The damage to the door was only superficial,
peeling off ornamental trim, etc., the door being reopened without
any difficulty.
Tha
protected by the door.
cterior of the above-ground vault was entirely

Although the concrete covering of the vault
was badly damaged. the steel lining of the vault kept it air tight.
This door is shown in Figures 11-1, 11-2, 11-3, 11-4, and 11-5.
10
'IMT REPR0~
4A
--
MC
A*''~~
14
NOT
RFJPPITITTTV
4~C
I'l
1.~12
NOT REPRODUIB!=
4-
131
NCT
q ~
J
II
~ A'
4.~.
~.
4-.'
-t
II
-1
I-I
r4
4~
14
NOT uEPWOfUCIM
4L
-Wmdr
15
SECTION III
COMPARISON OF DOOR DESIGNS
AND FINAL DOOR DESIGN SELECTIONS

There are several possibilities of door designs and materials.
Possible designs included:
A.
Solid flat plate door leaves
B.
One-way reinforced built-up welded door leaves
C.
Two-way reinforced built-up welded door leaves
D.
Curved door leaves
Possible materials for door leaves included:

A.
Aluminum
B.
Concrete
C.
Plastic
D.
Steel
Referring to Interim Blast-Resistant Door Study (2),
for
reasons of economy and ease of fabrication, steel was selected

as the best material.
Likewise, for the various possible door Jesigns, the one-way
reinforced built-up welded door leaf design was selected for all
but the lighter section doors.
For these doors it was found more
economical to use the solid steel flat plate design.

For easy swinging of the hinged type doors, only two hinges
should be used for best performance and ease of operation. The
bottom hinge contains radial-thrust bearings to take all the downward weight of the door and half of the radial (horizontal) thrust
which is due to the rotational effect of the overhang of the door.
The upper hinge takes only the other half of the radial
(horizontal) thrust (which is actually a couple).
This construc-
tion, by relieving the upper hinge bearing of any thrust loads,

allows adjustment of the hinge in a vertical direction without
danger of overloading the bearings by the adjusting screws.
16
In
some designs studied the weight of the door was evenly divided
by thrust bearings in the upper and lower hinges, which could
result in overloaded hinge bearings if there is a slight misalignment or if one of the vertical adjusting screws is turned
too far so that the screw is trying to "jack" against the two
bearings and force them apart.
In other door designs studied
there were three hinges per door leaf, which made this problem
even worse.
In the final hinged door design the upper hinge
bearing "floats" vertically on the hinge pin and is therefore

unaffected by vertical adjustment or misalignment.
The top and bottom hinges by being adjustable in the other
two directions also, become three-way adjustable.
This permits
very accurate alignment of the doors so that they swing easily,
do not go "up hill" or "down hill", and have no "run" in any
position.
Since the door leaf, when closed, seats evenly against a
finished section of the door frame all around the door periphery,
and is firmly clamped from "rebounding" open by means of the
tapered end locking bolt system, the blast forces on the door are
isolated from the hinge bearings.
The tapered wedge locking bolt system used in the final design
is a duplicate of the same system which has been used for the last
50 year on bank vault doors and was successfully tested under an
actual nuclear blast in "Operation Plumbbob."
A completed 6'-0" x 7'-O" double-leaf blast door, 100 psi
rating, is shown in Figures III-1 and 111-2.
If it is desired to have these blast doors power-operated
(say for remote control or interlocking in pairs), this is easily
accomplished.
Figures 111-3 and 111-4 show the 3'6" x 7'-0" single-
leaf blast door, 100 psi rating, with the additional blast-proof
operator.
-I1
NOT REPRODUCIBLE
'4
=444
4-'r*
N'OT REPRODUCIBLE
Al-
19N
rrr
v-I
20
211
A composite list of the door sizes, drawing numbers, and

specification numbers of the final door designs is as follows:
Door Size
Drawing Number
25 PSI
50 PSI
100 PSI
Specification
Number
3'-6" x 7'-0"
60-12-06
60-12-07
60-12-08
60-12-06-60
6.-0" x 71-01"
60-12-09
60-12-10
60-12-11
60-12-09-60
81-0" x 8'-0"
60-12-12
60-12-13
60-12-14
60-12-12-60
12'-0" x 12'-0"
60-12-15
60-12-16
60-12-17
60-12-15-60
14'-0" x 18'-0"
6CL-12-i8
60-12-19
60-12-20
60-12-18-60
31-0" x 3'-0"
60-12-21
60-12-22
60-12-23
60-12-21-60
21-6" x 4-01
60-12-24
60-12-25
60-12-26
60-12-24-60
22
SECTION IV
DESIGN CALCULATIONS
In calculating the strengths of the door leafs, there are

three basic types of calculations, as follows:
1.
Curved door, 3'-6" x 7'-0", 25 psi rating

(Figure IV-l)
2.
Solid steel plate doors simply supported all four

sides, all 3'-0" x 3'-O" and 2'-6" x 4'-0" doors
(Figure IV-2)
3.
Structural Beam doors welded flange to flange

(Figure IV-3)
In the case of the welded structural beam doors, calculations

were made on a per beam basis, considering the beam as simply supported each end.
In the case of the solid steel plate doors, the calculations
were made on the basis of a plate simply supported on all four
sides.
Basic plate formulae used were from "Theory of Plates and
Shells" by Prof. S. Timoshenko (13).

For the convex curved plate door a completely elastic design
was used, as the curved plate would otherwise fail by buckling as
soon as the elastic limit was exceeded.
In all cases calculations were made in accordance with the
Corps of Engineers Design Manuals (4 through 12).
The Design
Manuals show two basic approaches, the Energy Method and the
Deflection Method.
suitable.
The Deflection Method was chosen as the most
A numerical method of analysis was used in conjunction
with an Acceleration Impulse Extrapolation Table.

Recurring constants in the various door calculations were
lumped together to form one constant.
Derivations of the various
constants are shown in Figures IV-5 through IVCalculations are broken down into repetitive step-by-s tep
procedures.
A certain door section is assumed and then by a series
of trials the optimum section -is determined.
23
t
Typical calculations are shown for the 3 6 " x 7-1.

25 psi curved door (Figure IV-!), the 3'-6" x 7'-011, 50 psi
built-up door (Figure I'I-2), the 14'-O" x 18'-0", 50 psi built-up
door (Figure IV-3), and the 2'-6" x 4'-O'-, 100 psi, solid steel
plate door (Figure IV-4).
24
DOOR NO. 60-12-06

TRIAL NO. 1
CURVED DOOR
Door opening
CALCULTATIONS BY T.A.
CHECKED BY H.S.
Assume 6" bearing width and

Sf =
Door vertical
3'-6" x V-011
O(=
600, arch fixed at supports
41.6 ksi
ss
Peak reflected pressure
-80
psi
L =41'
10
Arch. P1
=.532'
31-611
R-h
*R
L/2
Sin
R-h=
*
R Cos
-4.00
-2.00
cc/2
0.50
O(./2 4 (.867)=3.468
=.532
25
3.468'
DOOR 60-12-06
Trial No. 1
Design for Direct Loading - Elastic
Assume a D.L.F. = 2.00

T = PrR = .08 (2) 12 (4)
P
r
7.68 k/in.
.080 ksi
V = P rR Sin
Coi/2 =
.08 (2) 12 (4) .5 = 3.84 k/in.
H x P r R Cos
oY/2 -
.08 (2) 12 (4) .867 - 6.66 k/in.
Required Thickness
t =
Arch Plate
t1 =
Tie Plate
7.68
.6 = .185
Try 3/16" plate
41.6
4.6
11/64" plate
Try
lt
Ty1/4
= .160
Shock Velocity
1
1117
Pso
7 (14.7j
Ll+
1117
6(25)]2
=1750 ft/sec
102
Time of Pressure Rise

h.532
to o U
150
U
1750
.000304 sec.
Period of Vibration of Arch Plate

9
TN
2ir
21
2
C 2 =4Sin
G(/2
[2 /
(R)
-1)i
12 (3/16) 3
kR
k
=12
48
.0541
(3/16)
12 (3/16")
=
12
887.2
25a
.0541 in.
DOOR 60-12-06
Trial No. 1
c< = 600 = r/3 radians
C
=4 (.5)2
=
/3
2/12
(887.2)2 + (9-i1
2
2
5.24749 (10
=9
724.3
=48"
30 (106) psi
bd 3
=12
W
= 490 (
1 (3/16) 3
3/16
16
12
7.6
=
T(=8)
724.3
=
"
12
7.6 psf
3
(12) 144
32.2
Tn
000549 in
.000138 #sec
2/
in3
.0001386
30 (10 ) .000549
%F8.38 (10 - 10)
19.98
.001828
Dynamiic Response of Arch Plate

The loading curve is assumed to have a triangular shape as
shown below.
P
80 PSI
:.:
to
T
.000304
.001828
t +3 sec.
.16
D.L.F. = 1.95
= 2
Section O.K.
n
(The David W. Taylor Model Basin, UJSN,
"Effects of Impact on Simple Elastic Structures".
Report 481, April 1912, Fig. 18)
25b
DOOR 60-12-06
Trial No. I
Buckling
PcR
(k 2
1)
~R3
pcR
8.5 for ,. = 600

6
30 (106 ) .000549
.5)2
(48)E
.1489
1.2
10.6 psi
80 (2) = 160 psi
No Good
3/16" plate O.K. for elastic direct loading, but not good
for
buckling. Try 1/211 plate for buckling.
bd 3
1 (1/2)
12
.0104
6
R
0(
0) .0104
(48) 3
[ 2.82
[,1.251
(8.5)
201 psi
80 (2) = 160 psi
O.K.
Use 1/2" arch plate

Use 11/64" tie plate
25c
CALCULATIONS
1-WAY SPAN DOOR
BUILT-UP DESIGN
SIMPLY SUPPORTED 4 SIDES
3'-6 x 7'-0", 50 PSI
TRIAL NO. 2
ELASTO-PLASTIC
DOOR NO. 60-12-07
CALCULATIONS BY T.A.
CHECKED BY H.S.
GIVEN:
Assumed Beam
=5 x 5 WF 16#
= Load Duration
.050 Sec.
= Peak Reflected Pressure
197 PSI
= Total Weight of Beam
58.6 Lbs.
= Area of Beam (Width x Span)
220.5 Sq. In.
= Span Length of Beam
= Section Modulus of Beam
3-1/2 Feet
8.53 Inch 3
= Moment of Inertia of Beam
21.3 Inch 4
KL
Elastic Mass Constant
.780
Plastic Mass Constant
.667
e
KL
p
FIND:
1.
MAXIMUM ELASTIC DEFLECTION (FEET)

X
2.
22
x S
I
.0017333 x
.0017333 x 4.91 =
.001733 x
.008511
NATURAL PERIOD (SECONDS)

M
T
6.2832 x
fK
- .001420
7949
6.2832 x
6.2832 x A" .000000178638
6.2832 x .00042265 =
21
26
.00266
3.52 x 8.53
21.3
DOOR 60-12-07
3.
(KIP-SEC 2/FT.)
EQUIVALENT MASS (ELASTIC)

W X KLM
58.6
32,200
.78
32,200
4.
5.
W x 20.704 x 10
.001213
STIFFNESS FACTOR (KIP/FOOT)

K
6.
(KIP-SEC2 /FT.
EQUIVALENT MASS (PLASTIC)

MP =
.001420
16,000 x L
MAX. ELASTIC RESISTANCE (KIP

R
= 27.7333 x
el
21.3
42.875
16,000 x
LB)
27.7333 x
2.6a
7,949
8.53
3.5
68
T2
DOOR 60-12-07 - T2
7.
CONSTANTS FOR EXTRAPOLATION TABLE

ELASTIC RANGE
a.
Tn
.00266
T=
10
10
b.
3t
c.
(4t)2=
d.
.000266
.0002
4 x 108
P
P0
XA
19 7
01,000
e.
-P
f. P
P4(3
x 2 2 0.5KIP
1,000
M
e
-2
.0002
-
.05
43.2
.2P
43.4-43.2
g.1P1
0
43.4
1
434
= .0014202(
2
.2
15,253
h.
X1
=aX ({t)
t) 2
=
- 8
4x10
Me
15,253 x (4 x 108) = .000610
.001420
PLASTIC RANGE
a. /\t
b. (At)
b.
c.
=
2
.0002
x i0
4 x 10
3298 x i
4 x=
.001213
26b
I
Mi
44
r-
41
0))
:4
0 0
-i
0 C% n
%.
%D C-
N-.'
*ri
HC'J
'-4
C1
C14 r400N
..-
't
14m
00
C00
.I.
... .
It00
00000C)0n-0
C0
f7
c'.
C)0
tr
tON-I
000H.
f0C0
M%
%N
000000000000
. .
CCL
44
04%
mr
00
00
0C0
41i
r4
0- C) 0
o
o
o
o
o )o0
KJ0oooooooOoo
)0 0 000)00
) :
07 000000C:
0rq
0J
00
cr0
W-.
41
r-4
1c%
-4 0'14
04M
zII
r-0
-4 0 0
-" -
Ol
-I
Cq
Cl)
CII Cq r,4*404IN
I I
"
40)
4-4'J.4
I4
00
r-
00~4 co00-t
,-4
:-4
UF,
40 w
0 00 0C4
- 00000
-,tD
-4H
0
-
0
1
26c
C
*
0
V-0
-4
-A
C1 :T
0 cc1
0
0
JJ
UCJ'
U4
J0
r-4
-4 a)
0)4)t44M
In12
4H
DOOR 60-12-07
T -. 05
Rx TABLE
Maximum R to Minus R
x
el
_x.
68
_x.
.011070
7,949
.009466
.001604
"
"
.007839
.006182
.003231
.004888
.006146
"
.004924
f.004388
.006682
?6d
.000426
"
"
.010694
"
"
Xx
3.4
64.6
"
12.8
55.2
"
"
25.7
38.9
42.3
29.1
19.1
"
48.9
53.1
14.9
T2
0T
*r
C-4
toi
At
'0
vv~
E-0
26 e
01
DOOR 60-12-07
Time
.009
7.
T2

ELASTIC RANGE
T
a.
.00266
.000266
10
nt
b.
c. (
t)=
d.Po
.0002
4 x 10 8
Pr
X
1,00=
197 ,0
x 220.5K KIP
1,000
e.
PI
f.
=
-PI =
1,000
e(
.00
5 ) =
10
43.4 - 42.4=
P
1-
a0
42.4
1
.001420
43.4
-2
1
PI
002%
43.4 (1-
009.009
g.
43.4
6
=
h.
t)2
a X (
4 x 10-8
.001420
i.
Me
PLASTIC RANGE
a./\t
2 =
b. (jt)
c.
t)
.0002
4 x 10
4 x i0
- .001213
26f
15,162
15,162 x (4 x 10- 8 )
2,817 x 10
-8
3,298 x 10
.000606
C)I
(O '+ 4
~-4.
w-
0.
a .- .
In%
0r
XWa
01%D
0000t
0I
.or.
0 00
-,
.~ .r . o.
%MM0000000 00
C4
-000(%Cc0000000
N-4r-
00
T.
-1In
-f
- r--4-1r-40 0 00
I0O
0I
0.
CC
E-4
P4
'-
00
N %0) a%%DC4V)
4O
0OO r-4 r-4

o4
000
0 00
0
o000000
040000000000000
0r-4
a,
x
z
0
HH)
w)C-C
IN
4 0
-4
In. IN
In%.
ID
1; 040400*1 4-4rr-:
4-j
CIO
000000000
nT
I*
'4
r4
MNJ
tCO00I
40
1 00
00000000000000
Z
~ 0
Mr-r-4
-4
~N-4 e~cos
r-I
~c~~
IrCq
26g
inor4
r-4r-
)o
11
NC14
DOOR 60-12-07
T
.009
Rx TABLE
Maximum R to Minus R
x
el
Plax.
x/
xR)
X(
[(~x.
68
.009973
""
"_"_
"
RX
0.2
67.8
.001076
8.6
59.4
.007049
.002924
23.2
44.8
.004858
.005115
40.7
27.3
.009953
.000020
.008897
7,949
.007105
"
56.5
11.5
.001567
.008406
it
66.8
1.2
.001262
.008711
"
69.2
"_"_.002868
"
26h
1-
1.2
T2
44)
a'+
00
o)
a)
H
CD
r-4- m
1
0
zz
0ci
-~c
H
0
ul)
0
N
26N
DOOR 60-12-07
TI
CALCULATION FOR LOCAL CONDITION
L = .432'
----
31
1/4
M s = 1/4 x 41.6 xt
1.
= 1/4 x 41.6 x.141
= 1.4 K in/in
2.
3.
4.
2M
12
8 x .233o
.432
8M
L
.233 K-ft/in
1.4
x -
4.3
K/in
12 Pr x L x 1 (per inch)
(12)(197)(432)
R
R=
1 K/in
1,000
1,000
5. D.L.F.
4.3
4.3
26j.
>
(Member remains elastic)
DOOR 60-12-07
TI
CHLTCK FOR LOCAL BUCKLING OF ONE-WAY BEAMS
Beam = 5 x 5 WF @ 16#
LOAD
COMPRESSION FLANGE
a = 4-1/4
b-
tf =3/8
t
5-3/16
ft
--
=1/4
tf4
Web Ratio
4.25
.25
-t
b-
17
w
WEB REINFORCEMENT (WHEN REQUIRED)
LOAD
LA
COMPRESSION FLANGE
Cs
Eb
Length of Stiffeners
Locate symmetrical with mid-point of door
26k
DOOR 60-12-07
CHECK FOR LATERAL-TORSIONAL BUCKLING
GIVEN:
K
0.51
Span = 42
Depth of Beam - 5.000
Width of Flange
Thickness of Flange = .360
KI Ld
b Tf
5.184
.51 x 42 x 5.000
5.184 x .360
107.100
1.866
=
1.
57.4
<
100
26 1
O.K.
T2
DOOR 60-12-07
BEARING AREA STRESS
R
Maximum Resistance of Door

R
el
Re
Rm
h
Wb
el
68,000#
el5
=
68,000 x
2 x 1/2 x 85
1,156,000
85
=
-
1,156,000
5.000
SBR
Bearing Stress =
Sb
AB
L 2 xh
el x L2 x Wb
Area of Leaf
Area of Beam
m
A
B
R
m
2Txh
85 in2
<
13,600
30,000 PSI
-V
Wb=5
1/2
L
-2
26 m
h=85
OK
DOOR 60-12-07
STRIKER THICKNESS CALCULATIONS
Take a 1" wide typical strip.
(see p. 26m)
Force per Lineal Inch = F - Rm

= SB x T
Bending Moment = M Thickness = d =
46M
F x D =
13,600 x .500 =
6,800 x .372
[.367788
r
.60696
SB
i"
1/8
D = 8.375
26n.
*SB Allowable Bending Stress #A-7 Steel

B6
=41,600
6,800
2,550
USE I"
DOOR 60-12-07
REBOUND LOAD CALCULATION FOR LOCK BOLTS
Consider rebound resisted equally by "dead latch" and lock

bolts.
.25 P
m
Then:
Rebound force per bolt = P =
Max. Rebound Force

2 x no. of lock bolts
289,000
12
24,083
Maximum total rebound force is obtained from rebound calculations.
"DEAD"
LATCH
RFA
RR FACE OF DOOR
26 o
LOCK BOLTS
'4
o40
cu
Q)Y
>05-
o, CL
Cr
Q)
E
-t.)
-r
UA
-AQ)4n0
%D
CY40
I4
5-
a41
C)Cr, (1
0-
0Y
COE
0~
a)*-
0rC
c
C
00C0
-4
-4
C'S
r-4
-Y)
00
/Lr
%.
r-0
Ci
trn
cu
ON
00
C,4
C,4-,
V')
x-
P4
C'J..0
11
Q)
4Cf4
0u
(1)
(n--
41)
coco
a)
o4
60
-,
C4
0~~~
a)
t~-
a)X4C4-tc
000
C4
a'
26p
0000
DOOR 60-12-07
CALCULATIONS FOR RADIAL-THRUST BEARINGS
IN LOWER HINGE*
RPM
Fa /F r
=50
.65
Rotating Inner Ring

Thrust Load
Radial Load
Rotation Factor
Thrust Factor
Radial Factor
P
P
S".
2,076
746
1.45
.67
Equivalent Load
= XVF +YF
a
r
=
. 6 7 Fr + 1.45 Fa
(.67 x 746) +-C.45 x 2,076)
500 + 3,010
3,510
1.0
Minimum bearing is SKF #5303 or equivalent.
Use SKF bearing #5304 or equivalent.
* Formula shown is for Series 5200 and 5300 double row, deep
groove SKF bearings. Series #5300 preferred.

design bearings, check formula.
26 q
For other
C14
0
0
'-4
Z4
rZ
I If
>4Z
rM4
0
U)
z11
c0
r4
U~)V)
ODrZ
r.4
I-I/
ell
00-
11/0
U)
H
'I%
4
C/V)
Cl)
00
":3:
>4I
26r
000
C14
0
00
ri
0)
r4
o)
rI
x
%.0
~-4
dl0
Nr-
E0d r-X
4Cr
0)
5
d
oXN00C
0*
41
%0
N.'r-4 %D
WV0
C-)U1
a
Ltn
0* V
l
UW0
U
c
o 1
V4T4
X X-1
0.
11
V)0
5.i4
140
u
0)
%0
dlI
r-It
9I4j
O't
rlr, C41: 0
0
4
04V-m
Lrh
0
00
000
.A1
CI9
00
H-
0~-
0-
COE-
.0C.0
41:
0
H
26sj
H44.
00
C'-4
'I
%--1
E-1
0 col
-S.4
U.
.d-
:3
(n
+
0
0
0
aV 4
N U-1
C14
Nr-I4
r.-4
p+
U))
L- -
0
H
C.0
IIn
[I
26
t.
CALCULATIONS
1-WAY SPAN DOOR
TRIAL NO.
BUILT-UP DESIGN
PARTIALLY LOADED OVER FULL SPAN
14'-0" x 18'-0", 50 PSI
ELASTO-PLASTIC
DOOR NO. 60-12-19
CHECKED BY H.S.
GIVEN:
Assumed Beam
24 WF @ 145
= Load Duration
.050 Sec.
197 PSI
= Total Weight of Beam
2465 Lbs.
= Area of Beam (Width x Span)
2268 Sq. In.
= Span Length of Beam
= Section Modulus of Beam
17 Feet
3725 Inch 3
= Moment of Inertia of Beam

= Elastic Mass Constant
T
r
KIM
4561 Inch 4
.67
Cn
LI
Plastic Mass Constant
Loaded Portion of Beam L
.57
14 Feet.to
FIND:
I.
MAXIMUM ELASTIC DEFLECTION (FEET)

Xl
.000346666x
8 L32
S
T(
4 L12L2 + L1
2L -L
.1
(.000346666)(.081671)( 39304
1
-
13328 +
20
.000346666 x 94.869034 = .032888

2.

T
n
6.2832 x
M
T-- e
K1
.051290
6.2832 x
J- 150
15706
6.2832 x
J .000003265631
6.2832 x .001807 =
27
.011354
DOOR 60-12-19
3.
EQUIVALENT MASS (ELASTIC)

WX L
M =
__
4.
32,200
(KIP-SEC2/FT.)-
.051290
2465 x .67
32,200
EQUIVALENT MASS (PLASTIC) -(KIP-SEC2 /FT.)

1
W x 20.704 x
5.
10
=
2465 x 20.704 x 1
STIFFNESS FACTOR (KIP/FOOT)

80,000 x
K=
32
8 L
I
4 4 1
L
+ LI
4561
39304 - 13328 + 2744
=
4561
23,232
80,000 X
6. MAX. ELASTIC RESISTANCE (KIP

el =2
27.7333 x
L2 - L
2
2.7a
'V
15,706
LB)
.051035
TI
DOOR 60-12-19
7.

ELASTIC RANGE
~T
n
10
b.
At
.001
.01
10
a.
.001
2
2
-6
c. (A t) 2= 1 x 10
d.
Pr X A
447 KIP
1000
.001
)
--
t
p
g.
h.
i.
M
=
10
.004328
-6
1 x 10-6
19.496
.051290
Me
= 4328 x 10- 6 x
a. X (i\t)
t) 2
x 10
PLASTIC RANGE
a.
At
.001
O6
1 x 106
b.
2-66-
C. i/LI
438
-p I = 447 -438=
44
=P (
e. P
19.594
10
.051035
p
27b
x 10 - 6
TI
C14 0, C14 00fl C
+1).
~N
+> 0-
r-
r: D4
"w
00
nC44%D0
0 r-4 0
00
E-4:
-It
C*40
C'4'
00>0
.
4 '
.4
-- I r- 1 rf n r0
0
"10I
r'.0
%co
" coNCm%0
c
r-iO'0
r-
1-4
C14
D
'n
0
..-
0 %D 00 C14%D
C).
0000oC)00
0%n 0
-cr
00
-r
m
a% %0 m
0N
0 -4 A'0-I
I-%Dr-
4J
k**
o 0'I
0 4 cl
C)0 0 0C10C)0
00 C o00 r
f-.
C14
*-
C11 0t CN rf 0r
r
cr
C)0000
r0
rID0
r-
%~
D mo
-4 r-I r-4 r-I,4 . . . .
r-4
"I
c~~: i
z
0
--
C-,t
m~
g rsj-
P4
to
0% r- r-
n T-qCN
000
"'
0
'
0
00
0i
rIC4
"
cJ
0-
CNI 4
00c)
31
-2C'
Cco'
H d-0r
U)
a%0.00
33
4J4. )
4)
r-
44Ir-iO
.0
co
OD
*iI
cd
o~ 0o
n4r4
%C -
- -
0-
-rf
-I0'CA-viA
4-
ti
0
ZCj4
j 0o
0
c'J
JI)
Ia
C)
4J 4)
0
r-I
0
tMU
00 0000
00
01
f-f
0
4J'
43.
___)
Co
a)
o44-
VU)
(.2
'
cis
00
I.-~c
Ca
N' N'c
N~ "' N. C'4 r-4 0

0 0
000C0
10
N0
-%
00C'-4r--
r4 --
0C)00000000000000
nI
r-
r-4
uJ -r-
,4
(A-?L~i
-4
-4-4v-I
I-
'
r4.-r-4
27IcAI
-4r4
D~o0-
N'
R TABLE
x
Maximum Rx to Minus Rel
'
x.-
x.-
"
_-
_I
517
.071824
.077481
.001343
15,706
21
496
"
.073423
.005396
"
85
432
"
.067737
.011087
174
343
.016856
265
252
.057719
.021105
331
186
.056102
.022722
357
160
"__.0
"
"
"
61968
-27 d
"
trto
I-4
ri
z0
HV
C)
*Xa OT>-l
HrJC14
r-4
Zcc.
AI
0
If)
IJ3
L
6*
tn:-
27E-
0"
IC)
7. CONSTANTS FOR EXTRAPOATION TABLE

ELASTIC RANGE
T
~n
a.
.001
At
b.
.
.00
)2
1 x 10
XA
P
P
d.
KIP
428 KIP
P.024
f.
44
1,000
e.
-P 1
=19 KIP
447 -428
a-1
X1
t)
0m2
h.
X(/At)
x 10 - 6
.051290
.001
26
b. (At)
C. (At)2
4296
-6
4296 x I x 10.
19.496 x 10
PLASTIC RANGE
At
21
a.
- Po
1 x 10 6
19.594 x 10- 6
m=
27_ f
-6
004296
cC+
LON
r-l t%0
0%.0C>
nr %.DCYND
%C-0L C -a - -c%0 M'
cn
r4
%D
4.)
c:
wn
09
na
11-
cn
,*
-Li
10cO
C
*'-4
-1
,-ht--
. . . . .c
- 4rfr4c
CC) N
Cl L
'
I - co r- Dc
00
% - 00
-Hr-4 04r-10 acoD 0
D00
)
LI -
DC)C
-0E:
w-
00c
00
DO
.~~
G)a
N-
mo
V)L)
ia
0
%oma
)r
co
x D4
0>
II
Dt
nC
..
~0000000
ILA
0 0r
j-
Cl % - t tr) C4
(% C-)rC4 r
Q00000000000000
r-
r-
00
1~
%-o~~
D0
41
X
00r-4
0
-
0IC
3-
Ia
ft
L1
<{ 10
0
14
*** 0
xc
G%.
CC~r-I
U
--
.0
400g4O
n-t
14
.2C'r4ml go
00
1- "0
-
0- 0
0- 0
r-4 t
r-HG~I=
r- t-) loo
*'n
4 0
v00
00
'
1 %0-t
OH C% C> -4-4
U)~
Cn
.o nr-
IA
4-4
It-0
0-.
7g
0D 0
0H 1~~
a%* Cl
-tIi0O nc 4a - nc ICoc
CL
LA'0r
4-
g:
4o
4j-
11-
R
Maximum R
el..
XM ax.
-Ma
517
TABLE
to Minus Rel
x
R
K_
.063079
.062295
.000784
it
.057417
.005662
"
"t
.049576.
.013503
"
-- R
12
505
89
428
It
212
305
.022280
it
353
167
.033406
L.029673
"
466
51
" .029288
.033791
"
531
S.040799
"
15,706
:z
j27
27h
14
04
4;
01
00
126
f-4
0-
,C
0,
zz
0-
0~
T4-
4An
C>
10
00)
I2
0,
i'
DOOR 60-12-19
Tl
CALCULATION FOR LOCAL CONDITION
i
t = 1
24
5/8
i
1.
1/4 x 41.6
1/4 x 41.6 x 1
=10.4 K in/in
2.
2M
x 10.4
3.
1.738
5.
D..L.F.=
12.3 K/in
1. 125
4.F
1.73 K-ft/in
12 4.
Pr F
x =
L x 1 (per inch)
1,000
R
12.3
4.6
>
97 x1.15
= 1
12 x
x 197
x 1.125 .2.66
K/in
1,000
2
(Member remains elastic)
DOOR 60-12-19
TI
CHECK FOR LOCAL BUCKLING OF ONE-WAY BEAMS

=
24 WF @ 145
22-1/2
13-1/2
24-1/2
Beam
;d
LO.
Cn.RESSION FLANGE
tw
.625
lw
tf
b
tf
1. Compression Flange Ratio
13.5
_ a
2.
Web Ratio
22.5
.5
.625
=36
WEB REINFORCEMENT (When required)

LOAD
COMPRESSION FLANGE
ts
3,
6 t
- Web Stiffener
7t
- Load Bearing or
S Compression Stiffener
Length of Stiffeners
Locate symmetrical with mid.-point of door
2-7 k
DOOR 60-12-19
CHECK FOR LATERAL-TORSIONAL BUCKLING

GIVEN:
.51
I.
Span= 204
Depth of Beam-
Width of Flange = 13-1/2
Tf
Thickness of Flange = 1
KI Ld
24-1/2
x 204 x 24-1/2
.51 =
13.5 x 1
b T
f
27 1
188.8
TI
cJ
g
0n0
-1-
oc
o
001
-4
P4
0,
L1- H5,-
00
49
.4
to
E-
NJ
v-4
-4
a
P4
II27
kL
-Co
C4
0'
9zz
Cc
e'f
00
-.
%0Cr
'0
'.
(12
_ _0
4
4J
0)
C-
cc
r L,-
fr)
U*
r-
00
-4)
> q
%D
co
CJ
C4
I
to rIq0
*91 1.
6-,q
-1
x~
.0>
-n
60
:L
0
t:4.
0
277'
C4'
ce)
gn
(3
u-~Ln
-~
04
00
-A-
,-n
-1-4
4C4
bo
C/)
ot
CO
C0
C4r-
0.
34
41
-0
P-
to
41
ci
-A
oV
u14
044CO
0.
-4
c.)
t0
r-4
$4 0o
c'r)
14
X
a
0
QA
Oco
1 -A
$4 W
(3413
4.JX .0
a)
C4
-3
0
0)
Co
Na
(cn
..-
+
N
Co
-4a4
ij
eNC'
n*ra
+ 0O
63 t
to co
I4
%%0
03co1,
co
c2,
Ck
.0
x2:
r-4
O0
ft
0C
Co
i
14
Q).
413
ca
V~
X %D
1.
01-
r.0
-1 CL
IA0
G!
C>0
Z'
1-4i
H'-d :3: :3
270o
c
co
00
CC)
zi
0
0C)
0A
V~
CC)
zi
U-4 C1
ocn
-A-
7-
r14
0~IN
I:
~-
<
cjV
Co
27
~I~uoo2nluado
pro-L punonauI MMlw
C*4-
C-4
C144
00
00
0
C.)
C-14
27 q
-C
CV
o.
to -r
zi
(/20
C14
a0
CC))
a)
Ec- 0
0>
t&X
E~
uo~
IU
oC)
to
0-r4fl
C'
x
ii (N
ZI
C-l
rj
IfC
'0)
EO -t-
XCN
a'
CI
OCo
If
r-
4-Y:
Oi-
r-4-(
00
jc-If
ir q
(n
2 ZC
CII
C4
-4 t)
-,4
0o cj~'
ZIN,
1
Co
27 r
cn0
'-C4
4J
w0
cr.
C*4
-
44~
gli
CIO-rq
$41
1-4
toC
CC)
0.
Cv)
Cv).C14
.4*
%
C
C/3
ci
)
U)
:71
Ci
0c
411-A
U
z0ft
4:-4 a
10)
of- 0
- "41X
Q-
-A
00
(n
..
r-4-,-
co
Cl)
co~
le
02
s*
C*
co
CALCULATIONS
2-WAY SPAN DOOR
SOLID DESIGN
2'-6" x 4'-0", 100 PSI
TRIAL NO.
ELASTO-PLASTIC
DOOR NO. 60-12-26
CHECKED BY H.S.
GIVEN:
t
= Assumed Thickness
2.50 Inches
= Load Duration
.050 Sec.
Pr
500 PSI
W
a
= Total Weight of Door

= Short Span of Door
= Long Span of Door
= Timoshenko Moment Constant
a.
KLM
1021 Lbs.
30 Inches
48 Inches
.0862
= Timoshenko Deflection Constant = .0906

= Mass-Load Constant
.74
ELASTIC
.58
PLASTIC
I-A
FIND:
1.
ELASTIC RESISTANCE (KIP)

R
6.933 x t
8 x a
2079.90
2.586
2.
6.933 x 2.502 x 48
.0862 x 30
x b
80
ELASTIC DEFLECTION(FEET)
6.933 x o( x a
360 x 10 3 x
x
565. 31682
77,580
78
.0906 x 30
x 6.933
360 x 103 x 2.5 x .0862
.007287
28
DOOR 60-12-26
(KIP-inch/Inch)
PLASTIC MOMENT
3.
M
p
xt
=10.4
-T1
=l10.4 x2.5
=65
ASSUMED TRAPEZOID FOR CRACK-LINE SECTION
4.
(All dimensions in feet)

1.55
.9833
1.5
Loaded Area
Cross-Hatched
1.2998I
I
lici
.04167
Total Moment Arm
_______
4.0833
5.
AREA OF TRAPEZOID LOADED (SQUARE FEET)

A
(f + e) x g
(1.5 + .9833) x 1.24998
-3.10408
6.MOMENT ARM lic"t (FEET)

f xg
+Ie
x
2
.9833 x 1.249982
1.5 x 1.249982
2
+
3
3.10408
.49915
28a
DOOR 60-12-26
7.
TI
TOTAL MOMENT ARM (FEET)

=
TA = "c" + h
8.
.4991511 + .04167
.54082
)
UNIT RESISTANCE (Kip/Foot
M xL
65 x4.0833
.54082 x 3.10408
RL
nit
TA x A
9- ASSUMED TRIANGLE FOR CRACK-LINE SECTION

(All dimensions in feet)
2.514
'
1. 5
d
Loaded Area Cross-Hatched
i 8C"_
b
.9
h
.04167
B
2. 5833
28b
Total Moment Arm
DOOR 60-12-26
10.
AREA OF TRIANGLE LOADED (SQUARE FEET)

A
11.
x k x j
=1/2
-c"
1.50833
3
"c" + h
.54445 x 1.8960
163
163
TOTAL EFFECTIVE RESISTANCE (KIP)

R
2 x (158 x 3.10408) + (163 x 1.8960) x .80
1.60 x 799.49 =
x (Runit x
Pr xaxb
1279
500 x 30 x 48
1,000
=7
1,000
ELASTIC SPRING CONSTANT (Kip/Foot)
.110333 x 10
K1=
.007287
28 c
x A) x .80
+ R
PEAK LOAD (KIP)

0
16.
65 x 2.5833
TMA x A
167.9145
=
1.032277
.54445
Mp x ,
unit
15.
.50278
50278 + .04167 =
UNIT RESISTANCE (ip/Foot)

R
14.
TOTAL MOMENr ARM (FEET)

TMA =
13.
1.8960
MOMENT ARM "c" (FEET)

i
12.
1/2 x 1.50833 x 2.514=
TI
17.
PLASTIC SPIING CONSTANT (K-ipiFoot)
(Assmekw
-3 X e)
K2 - R1
x - xe
.005757
EFFECTIVE 7_ASS (Kip- Sec 2!Foot)

ix
32,200
1021 x .74
32,200
W x KIM
S.018391
p
19.
475
.o057
.082508 x 106
=
18.
1272 - 804
1021 x .58
32,200
32,200

T
n =K,
=
27r
6.2832 x
.023464
.110333 x 106
6.2832 x %1.000000212665295
6.2832 x
.0004612 =
28 d
.002898
.023464
DOOR 60-12-26
20.
CONSTANTS FOR EXTRPOlATION TABLE
ELASTIC
a.
Tn
10
.0029
10
b.
c.
(80'
d.
.00029 Sec.
.0002 Sec.
4 x 10 -
P0
Sec.
72OKip
t
e.
PI
( 1
.0002
o.050
720 (1
=
f"
-PI
=720 -71-
.5
.5
717 KIP
3 Kip
P
g.
a
e
720
.023464
h.
xaox
2~-
-(
8_.
_)
15,321
15,321 x 4 x 10 -
=
(
X 10-8
.023464
28 e
.000613 ft.
170 x 108
TI
DOOR 60-12-26
m
e
ELASTO-PLASTIC
(For XI
PLASTIC
=m
ep
3Xe1 only)
f% 2
a.
(L-t)
c.
Rel
d.
R~x
*Not
m
p
Rel+ K 2 (X x
used this calculation
28 f
xe
-TI
co
0
a)
C)
rX4
C> c:)r-4 r-4

0c)0
Cc4
00
.
0 Cn0%C
w-I~0
0
'T
000000000
3a
r MCo
r-0
C~C0co
N
Lncfn'"
_:
t4
x'
%-.1c
9cc9cor.
-n
0
0
00
0
0.
. 0 . 000000
Cq.
N
c.o.t
. .o
z4
C
0
_z
H0
-4
00
00
.iso
r %i
-0
0
0
000
00
00o00D
00 0
;,4r-
4J
z-0
H00
ctu
4-
000
-NN
U0c3
00
0.-I
.,-4
-r-4
LF)
Z -.
nL
n0
r40mcN4
Na 0
4rI0
4a
40
-. %
000*rq000
00000r- o0
im,
A.
r-
r-4 ro r-
N%
0000000P
0NO 00000
0f
U0'3
C14
rOW
-
.H
2C/3
DOOR 60-12-26
TABLE (T = .05)
Plastic Range to Maximum R

X
-~~e
4I.
I~X =12 I
.007619
.007287
.002920
.010207
82,508
.000332
1
+I
el~
27
804
831
241
"
1045
.012217
"
.004930
"
406
It
1210
.013363
.013479
"
.006076
"
501
"
1305
"
.006192
"
511
.28 h
1315
Ti
Maximum R
to Minus R
V-
1315
TABLE
el
, ..
.013479
"".010725
"
.012543
.000936
.002754
"
"__
110,333
"304
--
103
11212
11011
.005118
"
5E5
750
.005890
.007589
"
837
478
.003769
.009710
1071
244
.002391
.011088
"
1223
92
.002009
.011470
"
1266
49
".008361
'
28i
0~
C4.
0nC
m
1 0
OD
P41
-,
Co
U)
-4E
00
%0
a)
co
00
U 01
CflCII
I
U)H
0
-~E-
0~-
f-----0
0Q
W
28W
H-
DOOR 60-12-26
20.
~T
CONSTANTS FOR EXTRAPOLATION TABLE (T = .0041)
ELASTIC
Tn
10
a.
b. /\t
.0029
.0002
2 =
t )c.
.00029
4x10
P xA
d.
e.
Pi
SP
1
r
P
720 KIP
i
I
0.0041
o
/t
720 - 685
- P
--
g. a
o
KIP
PI
p1
x (._.9+
m2
e
.023464
ax
t A2
2
720
(-2
(t)
-35
o
35
6
.923464
M
e
15,094
2
-8
15,094 x 4 x 10- =
2 A
=
4 x 10 -8
me
ELASTO-PLASTIC
68,I
65 I
6
1
h.
72.1-0002
2
i
.0041
M
ep
PLASTIC
Not used this calculation

28 k
170 x 10
-8
000604
T1
a 44-
0Ln0%r-
0' r-
%0-co
-
N-
I-
.-.
%D
0~
a%
on
-r4'-koeJ~
r4
t-
co0
O nC
,
%0
tn'.r-
0I
OO
00 0 r4
nc
-4r4
tn~~
lI
nt
C: 0 00
-r
,a
0-
01
---
nw
C-4E-
C14
4J %D 0%
-C
>r
nO
(1).0
rv-4C>0 0 0 0
-4 r-40C)0 0
Cr-Ira) 000
0 00
0 0C)000C0
00
rX4 000000
)
)0C)00
00
C0
CV)
r4'
r-4
Nt
0
-
-400
Iz
000~
14r40O0N
ON r-I
0 0Ln
N
-4
r-4 r-I 0ra a
*r4IC1
C14a
04
4 -,
VLV4
Co
cn
4- -
4-
C
'-44f4
*N
--.
00C
.I .
d* .4 0N-0~
o00
VCY)V)r
0
*
r-
C4
-
CY)'t
28c1
'r
-
0
-4r4
N0 N C
cV
DOOR 60-12-26
(T
RxTABLE
-.
-T
0041)
Plastic Range to Maximum R

x
xel
.009285
.010731
.011194
~007287
.001998
.003444
003907
el
167
804
971
284
II
322
-1126
'2
82,508
_
______
___
2,8
1088
RX TABLE
Maximum R
to Minus R
el
[(
x, )
,,,,,.I
Mx-Xox
1126
"
"
"
___
.011194
.010550
.00C644
"o
.008860
.002334
"t
.006383
"
,,K1
110,333
___:
71
1055
of
258
868
.004811
"
531
595
.003523
.007671
"
846
280
"
.000775
.010419
"
1150
- 24
"
-.001422
.012616
1392
-266
-.002716
.013910
1535
-409
-.002924
.014118
1558
-432
28n
"
-C-4
ot
44
0)
+
E-4
C)
w
0
1
coz
E-4 E-4
1
4 c
"'0'
00
H
cn
C14
C.,4
~N
I
fn
E-4
C)0
+H
I4
0
H
00
0
0
0
0
%D
0
0
0
0
N4
Nt4-
E-cM
,o
E-
'00
IfI
/n c
r40
00
bo+ m
CU
0VX
cuCV
1--' d5
0
0
U)f
V)
q4X
~
r-4
-4
-c
h.-
HY
9qX
0cOo0
r4 -
11$4v
1
W)
H-
00
Ln
U)4
- C-4
M-!
If 14CV11
14.
r-4
C00
44
28)
r-
DOOR 60-12-26
VERTICAL STRIKER THICKNESS CALCULATION
Take a typical 1" long vertical strip.
Average Force per Lineal Inch = F = SB x T = 9,315
Bending Moment = Mb = F x D = 9,315 x .625 = 5,822
6 Mb
41,600
Minimum Required Thickness = d =

-
Use d
F
.839712
IF60 34,932
.916
41,600
(for T - 1")
3/4" (.7117 Min.) (for T - 1/2")
- Total force on vertical striker
41,600 - allowable bending stress
d1"
Section of Door
"C"= Length of Vertical

Striker
St
Striker
/,DOOR
-28 q
DOOR 60-12-26
REBOUND LOAD CALCULATION FOR LOCK BOLTS
Consider rebound resisted equally by "dead latch" and

lock bolts.
Then:
_Max._ReboundForce
Foc
Rebound force per bolt = P = 22 x no,Reno,of lock
bolts
=
8
8
54,000
Maximum total rebound force is obtained from rebound calculations.
"D)EAD"
LATCH
LOCK BOLTS
ZREAR FACE OF DOOR
28 r
'00
410
ca 0
14
0
r
()m
<04
9
r-4
00.0
C
a)0'
0
C 0 Jan
r
0
4 ri
$E 4
41
>1
0- r4 b
Unt
d- $
C)
1$4~00'O'a)C
,I
E-4
ON
C*
t4
-I inCO
,-4C-4
-4u
co k
C14
.C
In
C'4
*q
If
O N
00
Ln x
-t
H
r-4
)n
CI
-- I
ft
P4c~
$4
.0
077
to
CH-
00w
0c
d
n
r-
28
so
4
to
cn
im
.4
CO
"t0C4~
P4
.0
p4<0
00
p4
1
<HN
to
H
A
C141
00
co
cc
on
000
ODI
E-4
N1 r-4
0)N
1-1
MI-4
cr
c
C1
+
Ci)CN
r-II
H
'E-4
28
tr
U0
(D
H4
:r,
CO
U)
$4
Ho
ca
02
41 o~
co
cv)
rI~
-
a)0
C..)
N4-JC
0~
CP4
E-
r-4 U
to
U0
C. Z
*.t0o
CO
00O
)H-1
)
(0
).-1
a)
90
rZ4
44
Xa
0
Hi
mO
----
N4
00c
HO
%.,t
CO
0~
C
m
Sr-4
41
41
co
CO
0
E-4
4
41
0
-a
COO
01
Nn
II
,"If
I.~
ca
r-
HCZW
__
29
COr0
CO,
CO
N
gO
rz
0 r-I
CO
CO
>
0Or-4
.0
z~
044
cu
-4t4
+
0i
Q)0
o4
0
xo
4i
U)4
z~~z
U)-~-
00
r:
Cua-
caY
C:
0~4.I
U)
).4
1-
00
<'-
0
cu
ta.-
14
U))
ca
r4
Hr
Cu
4
-.
Q)444
0u)
0 H
14
0)ou
D.
cu
(nS
r 4
0
Ia.
U)
C
r
-4
4-I
Ca
)u
I2
00(
(n)
44
4-i2
C')
CNC'
Hct
0X
Q))1
xx0
X4 w4
xx
J4
l'-4
.4
Ic.4
+
CYi
01-4
1-4x
00
PQ
-It
Hn
0.
0H
:3:
El
I:
E-i
E-
29 b
(1
4JJ
r
a)
P4
0f1-1
r4
014
401
U)
CT0
0
H1
H-
0-
4r
K
00
2~-
01
0
H-
0
U
414
P4~0
I4
00
0~I
0
0
-4
01
0J
U)
(n
bo
0
En
0r
4
f-
0
Q)
C14
4-
0
H
44J
001
IZ
x
01U
60
0
Hr-4
0n
o-
01
00
0
.1-4Ct.~~
.,-I-
r-4-c
.1-
HIH
U
29
U
*v0
00
ce)
CN
u
-
4X
0
Go
K1
_1
r--4
I
44
.1
N
14
41
H
l
(0. P4
C-4
P4
00
H
Hq
X-
Nd
E-IU
ccI
04a
W
Ho
H4
4~4
x'
00
P4fl
N1
'0
C X
04
Co
300
N
0
M W.
0C
C-4
a) V)
b.4o
J44
014
___
0
w
-rii
ca
00
...
E-1
%tLt
Cu4
4.
CuT-c t
+
I
N C l,
C)I~%C
ca
cu
x!
I
Cu4
C4
c
ON j
04I
4C,
u
4
04 0
+N
C4
r:I
Cu
ON!
N!
l-
M0N
I~
Cu4
a)
N~fC4
JHtC
C4
cu
'lOC
30 a
41
N1
+
+
NI r-+
CNr-i-i
N
Ct-I
C14M
C~)
CrCI
0+
C)HN
3
) -;
P41
Nfl
+W
toN- P4C0
+N
P4
r--;
H-
+~0
N*o
r.0
Ha
I
:HI'
4 N
%-e
Nv-4v-
NI
r
enI "IH
C)
1
In
M4.3
a)
C%4I0
+-k
ci04r
rI
-4:N~-
1-
Xe
i1
PI
I
I
1-4
40
to
P4HC~
004-
00d
)H
Iq
0
0Y
)-Nt
C)
V-4
I~~~
P4
14~I
3 r3
H%
C)a
+ +
H1
*.l
+
C))
IeC14
C14
+l
C1N
NV
NtN
04
C14 C-
.4,
+r
i-
NNNt0
*n
-
-,
0I
0
H00-
rINt
4.I3,
CC-4
+)
C%
1-
b
30
r-q
-H
r..
co C4
Cw
C4
4N
00
$4
II
Q)
s-4
W
N
03
-4
3.
cu
00)
'-
N-0
Q)
+
0
C0
0
c")C"
HC1
nAH
).-I
C14
C)
-4C'I
T4
%-I
Cfl
-14
X.
a,
a)
If
'H.M
M
cIC
".I
r-
CY)
'.0
0
HC
Cv
0
-4
cc 0
0)
00
'-l
0
C
coj
X 41:
CNI)
co
c
x
C)
C.)
C4
Q)
0))
x-
_-
P4.
C.I
C')
to
%0
go
0CV
I
I:
act
00
x~ II
C'i
-Ao
XI X
1.0
X-
4-1
0)
x~r
Xc:
No
r)
co~ 0
F-
m0
ON
-4C14VY
0
0001.
0040
1.>0c0
0Q)
(1)
r-4..r4
0
0)
0
31
0
*-A
C)
0)
0
04
c-I
r-4
C*CVX0%
0 m
x~'
Cl)
0
>
N
r4
M
r-4
ICY
001
r-fr
'0)
%X
r1cr
"
00)
%0-
CY
MCY)
X
C..
CY)c
r-4C'
x
14 x
0
IC
HZ
-cn
'.n-
co4
CY) 04*)
r4J
HC,4
~-
-.
.-
r-.
00
C1
-I
0~
314~H,4
rS
0.
'h4
C14-
43.
0.
m3"4J
C- 4J C'4
C*
r'r-4.
ko
co
X
C-4
4-)
ce)
cu
r-4
caa
44
C1~4
Q)
H~W~
U) 0)
0
4.
Q)
co
4 -I<
14
r-
C4
.
E-44
r-4
wx
co
GO
0 w)
-H 41
c-
go
.
01
ao V
U4
1
41
-HW
oo
410
Cco
'0vi
~4
C1
c CoN.
32
caI
xV
M)
0
*4 r-q
0'
4J
0
CY
CC
a)co
mca
U)
CU
t-
C*-
ou
0N0
CUr
0u
0I
c
0
0U
.C
C1
U
41
41
"0
(-i
CO
Xo
0x
CU
)
X
41'cI
0Cl)
C
co CH
1 Ni
X1 o1
I
9:1c
r -'
co
ON
14
44
C
oJ t&
CC
4N
J
CU
m(a
mC-
Y) x
Y)U
SECTION V - BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
"Engineering Study of Blast Closure Devices," dated

Nov. 30, 1960, C. D. Price, Mosler Safe Cc., to
U. S. Corps of Engineers, Protective Construction
Branch, Washington, D. C.
2.
"Blast Resistant Door Study" (Interim) dated Mar. 30,

1960, Mosler Safe Co. to U. S. Corps of Engineers,
Protective Construction Branch, Washington, D. C..
3.
"The Effects of Nuclear Weapons," 1957, prepared by

the United States Department of Defense, published
by the United States Atomic Energy Commission.
4.
"Design of Structures to Resist the Effects of Atomic

Weapons," January 1957, EM 1110-345-413 Department of
Army, Corps of Engineers.
5.

We-apons," 15 March 1957, EM 1110-345-414, Department
of Army, Corps of Engineers.
6.

Weapons," 15 March 1957, EM 1110-345-415, Department
7.

Weapons," 15 March 1957, EM 1110-345-416, Department
8.

Weapons," (Draft), EM 1110-345-417, Department of Army,
Corp's of Engineers.
9.

Corps of Engineers.
10.

Weapons," 15 Jan. 1958, EM 1110-345-419, Department
11.

Corp s of Engineers.
33
12.

Corps of Engineers.
13.
"Theory of Plates and Shells," S. Timoshenko,

McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1940.
34

Blast Door Calculation

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Blast Door Calculation

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

0

Section V -Bibliography ...........

Comparison of Door Designs

Review of Existing Blast

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND TABLES

Dynamic Load Factor (to convert a given dynamic load to

Modulus of elasticity (psi)

Dynamic yield strength of steel (psi)

Moment of inertia (inches4 )

Load mass factor

Spring factor (kips/foot)

Bending moment (inch-pounds)

Reflected shock wave overpressure (psig)

Time of idealized triangular load (seconds)

Natural period of oscillation (seconds)

Shock front velocity (feet per second)

This Document Contains

closures were covered in a separate report. (1)

The criteria specifies 25, 50, and 100 psi overpressures

Bibliography), with full reflected pressures to be withstood

elasto-plastically by the doors, which are to be operable after

Pedestrian door 3'-6" wide x 7'-0" high, single-leaf,

Pedestrian door 6'-0" wide x 7'-0" high, double-leaf,

Vehicular door 8'-0" x 8'-0", double-leaf, side-hinged

Hatch door 3'-0" x 3'-0", single-leaf, side-hinged,

Service tunnel door 2'-6" wide x 4'-0" high, singleleaf,- hinged

Door sizes mentioned above are clear opening sizes.

25 psi rating, double-leaf, sliding door is

powered by a manually operated hand chain geared trolley.

12'-0" x 12'-0", 50 and 100 psi rating, s:ngle-leaf sliding doors,

50, and l00 psi rating, single-leaf

sliding doors are powered by electric motor drives with an emergency

The remainder of the doors are manually opened and shut,

By using bank-vault-door type

three-way adjustable hinges, the door leaves are easily opened

The frames are of a one-piece box construction.

The doors are designed to be mounted in the door frames, adjusted

The rebound force

is taken care of by a bank-vault-door type locking bolt mechanism.

100 P45 1 j53 6b

8-0 it0 Z5 9.5' 1 *I 41

REVIEW OF EXISTING ELAST DOORS STUDIED

Rath:er than a detailed list of all door drawings available

Constructed of 8" channel and beams

3 side hinges, 3 separate manual

Ammann & Whitney

Constructed of 14" @ 43 WF beams running

and 1/4" back plate. Runs on three

Ammann & Whitney

Constructed of 8" thick solid steel

Black & Veatch

Constructed of 12" "I" beams running

Black & Veatch

Constructed of 4" channels running short

Black & Veatch

Constructed of 6" "I" beams running

Constructed of structural tees, ST 5 I's

Double door, constructed of structural

Constructed of 1/4" thick steel plate

13 various size doors consisting of 5/8"

Daniel, Mann, Johnson

2" thick curved steel plate, sidehinged door.

From the preceding simmary of existing door designs, the