PO10-Ability to impart effectively complex engineering activities through presentations, written and verbal communications to the engineering community

and socie
COMMUNICATION SKILLS
(a)-The ability to written and orally deliver ideas clearly, effectively and confidently
(b)-The ability to written and listen actively, and critically, and subsequently able to respond (provde feedback-reflection learning) constructively.
(c)-The ability to present clearly, confidently and appropriately to level of target audience

Criterion

(a)-The ability to deliver

ideas clearly, effectively
and confidently

1 mark (2.0)-Poor

2 marks(2.33)-Moderate

3 marks(2.67)-Satisfactory

Able to deliver ideas only with

Unable to deliver ideas clearly, constant prompting. Delivery of Able to deliver ideas with limited
effectively and confidently in the ideas still not clear, not
clarity, confidence and effectiveness
portfolio
confident and effective in the
in the portfolio
portfolio.

(b)-The ability to written

and listen actively, and
Unable to write learning
critically, and subsequently
reflection clearly, effectively and
able to respond (provIde
confidently in the portfolio
feedback-reflection
learning) constructively.

Able to write learning reflection

only with constant prompting.
Delivery of ideas still not clear,
not confident and effective in
the portfolio.

Able to write learning reflection with

limited clarity, confidence and
effectiveness in the portfolio

(c)-The ability to present

clearly, confidently and
appropriately to level of
target audience -Portfolio
development & delivery

Portfolio prepared is
presentable but not clear and
organize well

Portfolio prepared is presentable

and clear but with minimum effort

Portfolio prepared is not

presentable

PO12-Ability to recognise the need to undertake life-long learning and acquire the capacity to do so independently in the broadest context of technological change.
LIFE-LONG LEARNING SKILLS
(a)-The ability to find and manage relevant information from different sources
(b)-The ability to accept new ideas and willingness to embrace autonomous learning

Criterion
(a)-The ability to find and
manage relevant
information from different
sources

1 mark (2.0)-Poor
No relevant sources &
references mentioned in the
portfolio

(b)-The ability to accept

No self-learning shown in the
new ideas and willingness
portfolio. Not able & willing to
to embrace autonomous
conduct autonomous learning
learning

2 marks(2.33)-Moderate

3 marks(2.67)-Satisfactory

There are less than 3 relevant

sources & references
mentioned in the portfolio

There are more than 3 relevant

sources & references mentioned in
the portfolio

There are minimal selflearning criteria shown in the

portfolio

There are self-learning criteria

shown in the portfolio but with no
proper reflection

PO8-Ability to exercise professional civil engineering practices with ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities.
ETHICS
(a)-The ability to understand the effect of economy, environmental & cultural in professionalism
(b)-The ability to analyze and make decision in solving problem related to ethics

Criterion

1 mark (2.0)-Poor

(a)-The ability to
understand the effect of
There are no elements of
economy, environmental & social,cultural,global,ethical &
cultural in professionalism environmental awareness
in preparing the portfolio

2 marks(2.33)-Moderate

3 marks(2.67)-Satisfactory

There are minimal elements of There are sufficient elements of

social,cultural,global,ethical &
social,cultural,global,ethical &
environmental awareness
environmental awareness

(b)-The ability to analyze

and make decision in
solving problem related to
ethics

There are so many plagiarism

element found in the portfolio
and sources are not justified (no
citation)

There are minimal plagiarism

element found in the portfolio
and sources are not justified
(no citation)

There are minimal plagiarism

element found in the portfolio and
sources are not clearly justified (no
proper citation)

munications to the engineering community and society at large

4 marks(3.33)-Good

Able to deliver ideas clearly,

confidently and effectively
most of the time in the
portfolio

5 marks (4.0)-Excellent

Able to deliver ideas clearly,

confidently and effectively at all
times in the portfolio

Able to write reflection learning

Able to write learning reflection
clearly, confidently and
clearly, confidently and effectively
effectively most of the time in
at all times in the portfolio.
the portfolio.

Portfolio prepared is
presentable, clear and very
organize

Portfolio prepared is presentable

and very organize with interactive
features

ly in the broadest context of technological change.

4 marks(3.33)-Good

5 marks (4.0)-Excellent

There are more than 3 but

There are more than 5 relevant
less than 5 relevant sources &
sources & references mentioned in
references mentioned in the
the portfolio
portfolio

There are self-learning criteria

There are self-learning criteria
shown in the portfoliowith strong
shown in the portfolio but
reflection learning to accept new
proper reflection learning
ideas

al ethics and responsibilities.

4 marks(3.33)-Good

There are strong elements of

social,cultural,global,ethical &
environmental awareness with
minimal justification

5 marks (4.0)-Excellent

There are strong elements of

social, cultural, global, ethical &
environmental awareness with
excellent justification

There are minimal plagiarism

There are no plagiarism element
element found in the portfolio
found in the portfolio and sources
and sources are clearly justified
are clearly justified (with citation)
(with citation)

STUDENT LEARNING PORTFOLIO (SLP) ASSESSMENT FORM

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ADVISOR
PROGRAMME
SEMESTER

PO8-Ability to exercise professional civil engineering practices with ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and re
Criterion

(a)-The ability to understand the effect of economy, environmental & cultural in professionalism

(b)-The ability to analyze and make decision in solving problem related to ethics

Nama

No. Pelajar

Nurhidayah Binti Ahmad Zawawi

2016647522

Nur Amalina Amirrudin

2016209972

MOHAMMAD IKHWAN BIN ABDULL RAHMAN

2016209832

MUHAMMAD AIDIL AKRAM BIN ROSLAN

2016647532

NOR ANISAH BT NOR AZMAN

2013132295

Ruwaihan Binti Ramlee

2014462334

SITI ZUBAIDAH BINTI BIBIT

2015896728

Zulfaiz bin Zulkifle

2014486582

SITI NUR SYAHIRAH BINTI MOHD NAZRI

2014850156

10

SITI ZUBAIDAH BT AHMAD

2015829128

11

Mohd Fathul Khairi Bin Md Rejab

2014860944

12

Siti Shahirah Binti Suhaili

2015208572

: EC221
: September 2016 - January 2017

DATE OF EVALUATION :

t to professional ethics and responsibilities.

1 mark (2.0)-Weak

2 marks(2.33)-Acceptable

3 marks(2.67)-Average

4 marks(3.33)-Competent

5 marks (4.0)-Excellent

There are minimal

There are no elements of elements of
social,cultural,global,ethical social,cultural,global,ethi
& environmental awareness cal & environmental
awareness

There are sufficient

elements of
social,cultural,global,ethical
& environmental awareness

There are strong

elements of
social,cultural,global,ethic
al & environmental
awareness with minimal
justification

There are strong elements

of social, cultural, global,
ethical & environmental
awareness with excellent
justification

There are so many

plagiarism element found
in the portfolio and sources
are not justified (no
citation)

There are minimal

plagiarism element found
in the portfolio and sources
are not clearly justified (no
proper citation)

There are minimal

plagiarism element
found in the portfolio and
sources are clearly
justified (with proper
citation)

There are no plagiarism

element found in the
portfolio and sources are
clearly justified (with proper
citation)

There are minimal

plagiarism element
found in the portfolio
and sources are not
justified (no citation)

(a)

(b)

(c)

STUDENT LEARNING PORTFOLIO (SLP) ASSESSMENT FORM

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ADVISOR
PROGRAMME
SEMESTER

: EC221
DATE OF EVALUATION :
: September 2016 - January 2017

PO10-Ability to impart effectively complex engineering activities through presentations, written and verbal communications to the engineering commun
Criterion

1 mark (2.0)-Poor

2 marks(2.33)-Moderate

4 marks(3.33)Competent

3 marks(2.67)-Satisfactory

(a)-The ability to deliver ideas clearly, effectively and confidently

Unable to deliver ideas clearly,

effectively and confidently in the
portfolio

Able to deliver ideas only with

constant prompting. Delivery of Able to deliver ideas with
ideas still not clear, not
limited clarity, confidence and
confident and effective in the
effectiveness in the portfolio
portfolio.

(b)-The ability to written and listen actively, and critically, and

subsequently able to respond (provIde feedback-reflection
learning) constructively.

Unable to write learning reflection

clearly, effectively and confidently in
the portfolio

Able to write learning reflection

only with constant prompting.
Delivery of ideas still not clear,
not confident and effective in
the portfolio.

Able to write reflection

Able to write learning reflection
learning clearly,
with limited clarity, confidence
confidently and
and effectiveness in the
effectively most of the
portfolio
time in the portfolio.

(c)-The ability to present clearly, confidently and appropriately to

level of target audience -Portfolio development & delivery

Portfolio prepared is not presentable

Portfolio prepared is
presentable but not clear and
organize well

Portfolio prepared is
presentable and clear but with
minimum effort

Nama

(a)

No. Pelajar

Able to deliver ideas

clearly, confidently and
effectively most of the
time in the portfolio

Portfolio prepared is
presentable, clear and
very organize

(b)

(c)

Nurhidayah Binti Ahmad Zawawi

2016647522

Nur Amalina Amirrudin

2016209972

MOHAMMAD IKHWAN BIN ABDULL RAHMAN

2016209832

MUHAMMAD AIDIL AKRAM BIN ROSLAN

2016647532

NOR ANISAH BT NOR AZMAN

2013132295

Ruwaihan Binti Ramlee

2014462334

SITI ZUBAIDAH BINTI BIBIT

2015896728

Zulfaiz bin Zulkifle

2014486582

SITI NUR SYAHIRAH BINTI MOHD NAZRI

2014850156

10

SITI ZUBAIDAH BT AHMAD

2015829128

11

Mohd Fathul Khairi Bin Md Rejab

2014860944

12

Siti Shahirah Binti Suhaili

2015208572

Overall comment on students performance

ns to the engineering community and society at large

4 marks(3.33)Competent

5 marks (4.0)-Excellent

Able to deliver ideas

clearly, confidently and
effectively most of the
time in the portfolio

Able to deliver ideas clearly, confidently and effectively at all times in the portfolio

Able to write reflection

learning clearly,
confidently and
effectively most of the
time in the portfolio.

Able to write learning reflection clearly, confidently and effectively at all times in the portfolio.

Portfolio prepared is
presentable, clear and
very organize

Portfolio prepared is presentable and very organize with interactive features

(c)
3

STUDENT LEARNING PORTFOLIO (SLP) ASSESSMENT FORM

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ADVISOR
PROGRAMME
SEMESTER

PO12-Ability to recognise the need to undertake life-long learning and acquire the capacity to do so inde
Criterion

(a)-The ability to find and manage relevant information from different sources

(b)-The ability to accept new ideas and willingness to embrace autonomous learning

Nama
1

Nurhidayah Binti Ahmad Zawawi

Nur Amalina Amirrudin

MOHAMMAD IKHWAN BIN ABDULL RAHMAN

MUHAMMAD AIDIL AKRAM BIN ROSLAN

NOR ANISAH BT NOR AZMAN

Ruwaihan Binti Ramlee

SITI ZUBAIDAH BINTI BIBIT

Zulfaiz bin Zulkifle

SITI NUR SYAHIRAH BINTI MOHD NAZRI

10

SITI ZUBAIDAH BT AHMAD

11

Mohd Fathul Khairi Bin Md Rejab

12

Siti Shahirah Binti Suhaili

Overall comment on students performance

: EC221
: September 2016 - January 2017

DATE OF EVALUATIO

ong learning and acquire the capacity to do so independently in the broadest context of technological change.
2 marks(2.33)Acceptable

3 marks(2.67)-Average

No relevant sources &

references mentioned in
the portfolio

There are less than 3

relevant sources &
references mentioned
in the portfolio

There are more than

3 relevant sources &
references mentioned
in the portfolio

No self-learning shown
in the portfolio. Not able
& willing to conduct
autonomous learning

There are minimal

self-learning criteria
shown in the portfolio

There are selflearning criteria shown

in the portfolio but with
no proper reflection

1 mark (2.0)-Weak

sources

mous learning

(a)

No. Pelajar

(b)

2016647522

2016209972

2016209832

2016647532

2013132295

2014462334

2015896728

2014486582

2014850156

2015829128

2014860944

2015208572

DATE OF EVALUATION :

hnological change.
3 marks(2.67)-Average

4 marks(3.33)-Competent

5 marks (4.0)-Excellent

There are more than

3 relevant sources &
references mentioned
in the portfolio

There are more than 3

but less than 5 relevant
sources & references
mentioned in the portfolio

There are more than 5

relevant sources &
references mentioned in the
portfolio

There are selflearning criteria shown

in the portfolio but with
no proper reflection

There are self-learning

criteria shown in the
portfolio but proper
reflection learning

There are self-learning

criteria shown in the
portfoliowith strong
reflection learning to
accept new ideas

(b)

(c)
4