UPDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS Re CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department US District Court Case 08-cv-08982 December 28, 2016

What Gives Them The Right?
&!
(((
&&"
"
!"" # $
'"
!
&
)#
* *
+
*
.
&
.
" #
,
"!
'
45
8
$ !
,0 1
*! &
#
,
%& '() %(* () +

/ $
2
3
*"! /
'
' !&/
.
$
- $ ,
2
$ $9/ .
,.
! '
"!#
+$
, -
'
. /
,
,
!&/ 0*/ ,
/
, .
6
7
%
$ !
1 $ ,
:
2/ 7 1
$ !
/
. / .
2
,
. /
!
. /
$
2
$ 2/
/
. / .
2
$
$
$& ,
$
1
./
1
2
!
, ;
$ 1
! /
/
$ .
/
/
2
.
(
, $,
/ 1
2
$
/
;
:
2
$
$
,/ !
/
<
!
$
7 !
.
2
.
$ $ * $ . / .
2
&/ .
= $
/
%
!
/
$/ /
$
/
. / .
.
$ ! $
/
/
1
>
72 //
/
2 & 11 9 ?
!
2/ / 1
$
$ ! /
$2 /
/.
@
/
/ $ /
AA
'/ .
&
6 / $
2 7 $ 6
2
/ 1
$2 / $
!
$ / &/ . 7 1 /
/
.
$ !/
.
/ 2
. $ / .
2
!
2
1
'/
$ !2
$, $
! $ , / .
$2
'/
$ !
2 $ ,
,
$/
2
B
&
$
.
$/
$
!
. /
..
. /
!
/
7 , */ )
1 "" ($ /
$
/ 222222$ (
1
(
0 (!"
! & / "
1 !" # $%$ (/!#/
"
) ! /
!
/ 1!
.
/ .
..
. & ,6
$
2
/
$
/ 1
.
/
!/
$ / ,/ $
!/ CCCCC 2 / /
.
!
.
1
/ 1
*/ 1! !
))
/
1
! #
! '
!&! */
/ .
$
($2 $
.% "/
!
/ $/
. .
$,
1 $
$
,/ /
/ D 8
$
/ $
1 .
/
/ 2
$ > 2
$ 1.
E
Lancaster
Cityv.Police
v. CATERBONE
CATERBONE
Lancaster
City Police Dept.
Page11of
of189
82
Page
!/
Saturday
August29,
6, 2016
Thursday
December
6
7
8
:
9
-, . /
/
/
1
:
"
/
2
F
$
/
:
/
+
,!
, $
&
$
? 0 !
,
$ .
./
!
, . /
!
,.
& /
$ !
> !/
7
/
1 ,
2 /
$
:/
$
% 2 1 1
! $
$ .
/ %
F
/ >
$
:6
2/ / : /
$
/
/
1 , /
,
$
/ G
$
2 /
1 ,
1
$
/
6
, . /
2
/
!/
!
.
, 1 , /
$
/ 7 /
1
$ , /
+ #
! '
"!#
D 1
H2 /
,
(
,
, /
> 1
D
! /
6
, . /
$ / 2 $
$ ! > ! I !
- ;
(!,1
2/
1
!
&
&
'/ D , &
!
.
2 $ $ ,. /
&
.
.)
!
.
! .
,
.
/ D ,&
!: $
,
.983 */ + #
! '
"!#
, . /
.
. ! !
B
/ 7 .
&
&
:
/
, !
,
/
2
/ 2.
J
$ )KD &
.983 / + #
! '
"!#
, . /
.
! B
.
/
./ 1
/
8 7) $
1
.
?
1/ ) 1
/
1/ 2
,. /
11
$
.
$!
, . / . ! , / !
$
@
, .
/ / . / !
' 1 /
)
3
/ ! ) !
1
! &
"
!"
!
#
.'
)
!
*/ ;3<< << #/ #= (
/ $ / + #
'$ (! / > !
#
#
! & ? ( !
!
/
.< :
!
.
&
, &
. &
$
? $! ? /
K)D()
,. / 4
/
, .
&
,E :
/ 2 !/
.
&
, > / $
/
$
.. : /
,
,. /
1 1
"
- /
7
.
$
? 7
$
!
/
.
B "
* /
,
1
/ 1 1 ,H
.
! ?
,
/ 6
=
,
1
!
/ ,
/
$? 7
/
/
:
! ! /
/ 1 1 ,2 2 /
B
-, . /
2 $ / D , &
1
"
.
$ 2 /
2/ /
/ $ .
/ .
" .
.
/
7 & , !/
-,
/ 2
$ 7
/
!
$:7 1
7 ! / 2/,
6 2
/
1 1 ,
/
/
? 7
/
# =
,
/ $
$,
!
$ / ' 1
%
.
/
71
.3 8, /
6
,. / / $2 7 $/
$/ $
$
/ 1 1
- /
7
.4 '/
$
.
,
/ 2 /
<
/ B
2/ /
$ / !
<
(
,
/ 6
.
.5 -, . /
2
$
/ 8 /
-,
/
2
& .
$ /
!
2 7
3
2/
!
$
,
,
!
/
.6 :
:
!.
,
/
/
..
.
$ 1
2/
$ !
, $
/
, 2/
, !
1 2 //
A
.G
1
$
- $ &
1 .
, / 4 D (;1
E . -I G ') 2/
/ G
/
/ - =
- /
,
/
$G
8
) $ 2
$$
$/
$1
/
& .
.7 :
L 2/
2 7 !
/
/
2/
,
/
/ . $
,
. /
7 ! / $ , 2 7 8 .
/
, . / 6 . /
$
/
1
$
2 /
!
. $/
/
.8 :
L
, . /
$
2 / /
/
8 7 ) $
.
! 11
$ .
/
2 :
1
1
/ &/
/
Lancaster
Cityv.Police
v. CATERBONE
CATERBONE
Lancaster
City Police Dept.
Page22of
of189
82
Page
Saturday
August29,
6, 2016
Thursday
December

Sammy Caterbone, my brother, also is subjected to Psychiatric Commitments by the Lancaster City Police.
' 2
.:
.9
3<
3.
33
34
-,
/
$
, .
. $
2/
, . /
7
L
/ !
' 1 .9:5 ' "
/ $
'$ !
!
,
$
"!1
! $
. $
$
.
$ , ..
. / &
, .
8
,
!
8
&
, K..
!
.
:
L :
$ , /
/ !
* ( /!)
"!#
)
1
5 1 " !
4 !
1
! ""'
"! & ' ( 1!"
1 ' ( ) )
'$
2/ / : / $
1
!
!
/
2
>
/
$ - ,
1
!
$ 1
$ ,
1
$ ,
/
?
1/ , /
* $
,
/
++
.9::$ @ ++
*
*
A
*
@
+ *
,
.9:8
1
, ,
!
/
*/
! 1
!
#
&
! B!""
!" "
$
/
"!
:
:
/
%& '() &KG%'J ): K% .
$ ,
+K
D
L0 .
,
/ !H / $
. / 8
1
D 1
$
$ K '>
$ ? $!
- : &:K:G J
$ , 8
(&G)(D
/
/
G% (&G)(D #
!
=
'
+ 1!"
(/!" ! # #
1! ""' 1
' /
33<
!""
(
) )
1 ""'
+
*
+
,
3<$ 3<<7 @ +
+
*
+
*
*
* * * @
**
++
+
+ ,+*
,
B
*
@
* 3<.<
*
*
*
* ,- +
*
*+
* *
+
B ,
*
+- 9$ 3<.6
*
*
* ,- +
*
*+
* *
+
B ,
++- *
,
- .9$ 3<.7
*
*
* ,- +
*
*+
* *
+
B,
*
@
*
*
3<.6 * *
-$
* 7$ 3<.7
CCCCCCCCCCCA ACCCCCCCCCCCC
$
+! !&
!""
&!
(((
#
&&"
'"
"
D&
# $
!
!" #
&
)#
*
<40.709<<<6 11!#
1 /
! # ! E # ! $
!
*/!
! # !
1 )) " 0 &K:%' K ?GD:&: -: &K%DG&' K) D: 8: :'J
"
$
"
*/!
! # !
1 )) " &
%
" H
" H
H
"" "
!
!#
!
!# 1
&
%
" H
L"H "
H
LLH
"
L
L
'"
!
)
&
&
%
-'
H
" -'
F
L -. I /
I
) !
1
'"
!
-:&G . I /
I
&
%
" (D
H
&
%
-D
H
-D
+ #
'
1
"
&
%
L
H
H
"
&:
"
, = ) #'
1
*/
!
!# 1
'"
! &
%
Lancaster
Cityv.Police
v. CATERBONE
CATERBONE
Lancaster
City Police Dept.
Page33of
of189
82
Page
Saturday
August29,
6, 2016
Thursday
December
Lancaster
CATERBONE
Cityv.
City
ofv.
Lancaster,
CATERBONE
PA Since
1904
CATERBONE
v.Police
Lancaster
City Police
Dept.
Page
Page441of
of
of189
82
233
Page
Saturday
August
March29,
8,
6, 2016
Thursday
December
" !
#
$
%& & & " #
#!
#
!
"
"
)
"
%
#
$
"
"
"
!'
#
"
,
"#
"
"
"
1
#
&
'
#
(
*
% ## ! .
"
#
/
%
"
$
)
!(
"#
"
&
!
!
"
"
00
#
"
"
"
2,
%
"
"
1
* !
333333
#
+,
#
""
)
"#
#
33333
#
'
5 "
7
"
"
##
6
#
"
Lancaster
CATERBONE
Cityv.
City
ofv.
Lancaster,
CATERBONE
PA Since
1904
CATERBONE
v.Police
Lancaster
City Police
Dept.
Page
Page552of
of
of189
82
233
Page
Saturday
August
March29,
8,
6, 2016
Thursday
December
CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Dept.
Page 6 of 189
Thursday December 29, 2016
Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 37 Filed 04/15/16 Page

27Gives
of 69Them The Right?
What
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP (Plaintiffs)
v.
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, et. al., (Defendants)
Case No. 08-cv-02982
DEFENDANTS
CITY OF LANCASTER
CITY OF LANCASTER MAYOR RICK GRAY
SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
LANCASTER CITY POLICE CHIEF KEITH SADDLER
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
CIVIL COMPLAINT
INTRODUCTION
1. Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE) and Advanced Media Group were located at 220 Stone Hill
Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania (Conestoga Township) until August 30, 2006 when CATERBONE
temporarily moved into a family residence at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania (City
of Lancaster).
2. The PLAINTIFF, Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE), alleges that the City of Lancaster and the
Lancaster City Bureau of Police and others colluded to deliberately ignore CATERBONES
complaints, an abuse of process, in an effort to retaliate, subvert, interrupt and deter current and
ongoing litigation and civil complaints against several major businesses and government agencies
with headquarters in the City of Lancaster and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Those would
include the Lancaster General Hospital; High Industries (not Penn Square Partners and the
Lancaster County Convention Center); Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial Corporation; a Wachovia
Bank branch (pending); Lancaster Newspapers; the County of Lancaster; the Lancaster County
Prison; the Hotel Brunswick (pending); James Street Investment District (pending); Aurora Films;
Haverstick Films (pending); and the Lancaster City Bureau of Police. The City of Lancaster and the
Lancaster City Bureau of Police are derelict in their duties in forcing CATERBONE to litigate for
duties and services due CATERBONE that are mandated in the bylaws of the City of Lancaster.
3. CATERBONE also alleges that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police were used to retaliate,
subvert, interrupt and deter other litigation and civil complaints against other police departments,
namely the Southern Regional Police Department, the Manheim Township Police Department, the
East Lampeter Police Department, the Millersville Boro Police, the Avalon Police Department and
the Stone Harbor Police Department. CATERBONE alleges that Southern Regional Police Chief John
Fiorill used is official capacity as President of the Red Rose Chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police
to help accomplish these civil torts.
4. CATERBONE alleges that by ignoring his complaints the Lancaster City Police Bureau of Police
gave the green light, or approval, for others to continue a long and successful period of
harassment, thievery, property damage, computer and electronic hacking, deletion and
manipulation of court related documents, records and evidence, mail fraud, eaves dropping,
invasion of privacy, criminal trespass, and the like. These activities are so intense that they have
taken on the characteristics of a hate crime.
5. CATERBONE alleges that the gross abuse and gross negligence defamed his name and that of
his company, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, which discredited his reputation in an effort to diminish
credibility in the courts; to thwart any reprimands by oversight agencies; and to disrupt and
thwart any possible business relations and operations of ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP. This has
resulted in direct and immediate financial loss, loss of time, and loss of income.
6. Chief Keith Sadler and the Lancaster City Police Bureau rejected and refused to resolve these
disputes through mediation when CATERBONE opened a case with the Lancaster Center for
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
of of
18969
Page727
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,

28Gives
What
Mediation in May of 2008. Keith Sadler communicated to the Lancaster Mediation Center on May
8, 2008 that he would not cooperate and mediate with CATERBONE.
7. On several occasions in 2007 several police officers of the Lancaster City Bureau of Police
instructed CATERBONE, in person upon responding to complaints, not to call 911 or the Lancaster
City Police Department and that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police would not respond or take
complaints.
8. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police only took one (1) incident of gas siphoned and stolen from
CATERBONEs 1991 Dodge pickup truck, and refused to take the over 50 (from December 20,
2007 to present), or so other incidents as a complaint, regardless of the efforts to have Lancaster
City Mayor Rick Grey and the Lancaster City Solicitor to look into the allegations and complaints.
CATERBONE had meticulously documented the incidents in a journal and a log of gas receipts,
photographs, and odometer miles for all of the incidents. CATERBONE also made a thorough and
documented calibration of his 1991 Dodge Dakota Pick-Up truck with logs of mileage and times
and dates of gas purchases in a report to prove the gas was stolen. Lancaster City Police Bureau
Officer Cosmore returned the report with such words as counterfeit, fake, written on it and had
the audacity to ask CATERBONE if he had a certification of the gas pumps that were listed on
gas receipts. There were some days when the gas was stolen 2 or more times. CATERBONE
alleges that perpetrators were using a kerosene battery operated siphon, or like kind, to siphon
the gas from the gas tank.
9. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police had responded to approximately 10 or so 911 calls in the
last eighteen (18) months to 1250 Fremont Street, residence of CATERBONE, for complaints of
property damage; stolen property, missing legal and business files and evidence for litigation;
computer and electronic hacking with deleted electronic files; harassment; terrorist threats,
stalking, stolen mail, etc.,.
10. CATERBONE had complained of abuse of process to state and federal law enforcement
regarding the situation, including U.S. Senator Arlen Specters office. CATERBONE had also visited
the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in both Harrisburg and Philadelphia for help and
intervention.
11. CATERBONE also had personal meetings with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray in Lancaster City
Hall on at least 4 occasions to find a solution to the problems and for help to mediate the
problems and or resolve the conflicts. The resulting pain and suffering, as well as loss and
destruction of property and financial loss that CATERBONE was undergoing was unprecedented.
12. In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public with their
Downtown Lancaster investments and business plans that were culminated over the past 9 years.
The Advanced Media Group also formerly and publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action
Plan via handouts, websites, and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major
stakeholders, City of Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and investors.
13. In 1997 CATERBONE had solicited Attorney Christina Rainville of Philadelphia and pro bono
attorney for Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case. The murder trials and appeals
of the Lambert case demonized Ms. Christina Rainville and U.S. District Court Judge Stewart
Dalzell. After CATERBONE submitted documents and audio recordings, Ms. Christina Rainville had
communicated with CATERBONE that she was not able to take his case due to the fact that her
Philadelphia law firm had banned her from taking on any more Lancaster County residents,
despite the fact that many more sought her legal counsel. On December 31, 1997, CATERBONE
had also personally delivered a CD-ROM to the chambers of U.S. District Court Judge Stewart
Dalzell in an effort to bring attention to his case. In May of 1998 CATERBONE submitted an
AFFADAVIT to the law firm of Schneider and Harrison outlining the prosecutorial misconduct or
Finding of Facts of the 1987 cover-up for Ms. Christina Rainville. CATERBONE alleges that these
facts were part of the attitude and the motives for the law enforcement-at-large of Lancaster
County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to ignore the rule of law and procedure in order to
bring these false arrests and malicious prosecutions. The Lancaster County community-at-large
had the same attitude toward CATERBONE. The Lambert case received national notoriety when
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
of of
18969
Page828
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,

29Gives
What
U.S. District Judge Stuart Dalzell freed Lambert on a Habeus Corpus appeal hearing citing she was
actually innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. Judge Dalzell was quoted in chambers as saying,
"I can tell you, Mr. Madenspacher, that I've thought about nothing else but this case for over three
weeks, and in my experience, sir, and I invite you to disabuse me of this at oral argument, I want
you and I want the Schnader firm to look for any case in any jurisdiction in the English-speaking
world where there has been as much prosecutorial misconduct, because I haven't found it. The
case was covered by a 3 part series in the Los Angeles Times by writer Barry Seigel on November
10, 1997 and a television episode on the A&E Network American Justice Series. The Lancaster
community gathered over 10,000 signatures on a petition to impeach U.S. District Judge Stewart
Dalzell for his rulings. In the end, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania took control of the case and
appealed the ruling that freed Lambert sending her back to prison. The case went all the way to
the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, after being denied any review. The case accentuated the rights
of Federal Law vs. State Law and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania solicited a team of attorney
generals from across the nation to help their cause. CATERBONE attended a hearing before former
Lancaster County Court Common Pleas Judge Larry Stengel in the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas. To this day, due to his knowledge and experience with the Lancaster County
Judicial System and Law Enforcement, and his own dire civil complaints, CATERBONE believes that
the over zealous prosecution proves that prosecutorial misconduct was never thoroughly
investigated or prosecuted in the Lambert case. CATERBONE will not let that happen in his cases.
CAUSES OF ACTION
14. On or about April 14, 2008 1999 HP Notebook n5150 laptop was rendered useless by an
intruder shorting the power cord. This was the third computer rendered useless since November of
2007, and the last computer available for use in the home and office. Other incidents were
happening while at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA since 1997. The only computer available
for use was the public computer at the Lancaster County Library on North Duke Street in
downtown Lancaster.
15. On March 18, 2008 CATERBONE went to the Hotel Brunswick in Downtown Lancaster to
continue take measurements of the Movie Theater for his continued efforts of a business and
development plan. (The Brunswick Movie Theater, or Eric, had been closed since 1995.
CATERBONE and Advanced Media Group had an agreement with the Owner of the Brunswick,
Hamid Zahedi, to make a formal proposal and offer for leasing the site. CATERBONE had begun
discussions in 2006.) On March 18, 2008 CATERBONE noticed that the United States Department
of Justice Office of Trustee was conducting hearings for Chapter 11 petitioners in the Presidential
Room of the Hotel Brunswick. CATERBONE had not received ORDERS from his United States Third
Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 08-3054 for his appeal of an issue in his Chapter 11 Case No.
05-23059. CATERBONE alleged that the ORDERS were stolen or never mailed from the clerk of
courts. CATERBONE thought maybe Dave Adams, the trustee for the United States Department of
Justice Office of Trustee might be conducting the hearings. The following day CATERBONE received
a disturbing email from Mr. Barry A. Solodky, Esquire, of Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C., 28 Penn
Square, Lancaster, PA 17603. CATERBONE had known Mr. Solodky since the 1980s and had even
solicited him to review his bankruptcy matters before the Appllent filed his Chapter 11 case on
May 23, 2005. The following email exchanges detail the incident and the false reports and
allegations from a member of Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C.:
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
of of
18969
Page929
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
1 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?490294791050398-L_1_0-1

30Gives
What
CLOSED,SPECIAL
United States District Court

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
CATERBONE et al v. LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU et al

Assigned to: HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Date Filed: 06/18/2008

Date Terminated: 07/11/2008
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Email: scaterbone@live.com
PRO SE
Plaintiff
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
represented by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

c/o STANLEY J. CATERBONE
1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
717-427-1821
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU
Defendant
SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER CITY
BUREAU OF POLICE
Defendant
KEITH SADDLER
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
CHIEF
Defendant
RICK GRAY
LANCASTER CITY MAYOR
Defendant
CITY OF LANCASTER
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page1030ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
11/7/2015 5:56 AM
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
2 of 2
https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?490294791050398-L_1_0-1

31Gives
What
Date Filed
# Docket Text
06/18/2008
1 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(ti, )

(Entered: 06/26/2008)
07/11/2008
2 ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS

GRANTED. THIS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED, WITH LEAVE TO FILE AN AMEDNED
COMPLAINT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE
THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
7/10/2008.7/11/2008 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(ap, ) (Entered: 07/11/2008)
07/11/2008
3 COMPLAINT against LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER

CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, KEITH SADDLER, RICK GRAY, CITY OF LANCASTER, filed by
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP.(ap, ) (Entered: 07/11/2008)
07/22/2008
4 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE..(ap, ) (Entered:

07/22/2008)
07/25/2008
5 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED. THE

PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THE
DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF PLAINTIFF DOES NOT DO SO, THIS COMPLAINT WILL BE
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDMENT, THE CLERK
SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT.SIGNED BY
HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 7/25/08.7/28/08 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED.(ah) (Entered: 07/28/2008)
09/25/2008
6 MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. with

EXHIBITS..(ap, ) (Entered: 09/26/2008)
10/10/2008
7 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS GRANTED; THIS

CASE SHALL REMAIND CLOSED STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 10/10/2008.10/10/2008 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(ap, )
(Entered: 10/10/2008)
PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
11/07/2015 05:55:41
PACER
Login:
am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:
Description:
Docket Report
Search
Criteria:
2:08-cv02982-MAM
Billable
Pages:
Cost:
0.10
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page1131ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
11/7/2015 5:56 AM
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
1 of
of33
69
What32
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page1232ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Case
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
2 of
of33
69
What33
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page1333ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Case
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
3 of
of33
69
What34
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page1434ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Case
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
4 of
of33
69
What35
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page1535ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Case
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
5 of
of33
69
What36
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page1636ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Case
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
6 of
of33
69
What37
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page1737ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Case
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
7 of
of33
69
What38
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page1838ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Case
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
8 of
of33
69
What39
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page1939ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Case
Document
373 Filed
Filed04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
9 of
of33
69
What40
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page2040ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
10
of 69
33
What41
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page2141ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
11
of 69
33
What42
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page2242ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
12
of 69
33
What43
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page2343ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
13
of 69
33
What44
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page2444ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
14
of 69
33
What45
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page2545ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
15
of 69
33
What46
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page2646ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
16
of 69
33
What47
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page2747ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
17
of 69
33
What48
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page2848ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
18
of 69
33
What49
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page2949ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
19
of 69
33
What50
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page3050ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
20
of 69
33
What51
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page3151ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
21
of 69
33
What52
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page3252ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
22
of 69
33
What53
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page3353ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
23
of 69
33
What54
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page3454ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
24
of 69
33
What55
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page3555ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
25
of 69
33
What56
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page3656ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
26
of 69
33
What57
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page3757ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
27
of 69
33
What58
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page3858ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
28
of 69
33
What59
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page3959ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
29
of 69
33
What60
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page4060ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
30
of 69
33
What61
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page4161ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
31
of 69
33
What62
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page4262ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
32
of 69
33
What63
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page4363ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Document37
3 Filed 04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
33
of 69
33
What64
Gives
Them The Right?
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page4464ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Case
Document
377 Filed
Filed04/15/16
10/10/08 Page
Page
65
1Gives
of 69
1 Them The Right?
What
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
:
:
:
:
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, et al.:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 08-2982
O R D E R
AND NOW, this
day of October, 2008, upon
consideration of plaintiffs Motion for Withdraw Without

Prejudice (Doc. No. 6), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1)
Plaintiffs Motion for Withdraw Without Prejudice is
GRANTED; and
(2)
This case shall remain CLOSED statistically.

BY THE COURT:
/S/ MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN, J.
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page4565ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
Civil Rights Division Home Page
1 of 4
http://www.justice.gov/crt/split/documents/polmis.php

66Gives
What
Skip to content
En Espaol
ADDRESSING POLICE MISCONDUCT
Main Page
AAG Thomas E. Perez
LAWS ENFORCED BY THE
About Us
Section Sites
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FOIA
Press Releases
Speeches & Testimony
Frequently Asked Questions
Special Topics
Post 9/11 Backlash
H1N1 Response
ADA
FACE
Cases & Briefs
Recruitment & Employment
Contact Us
Go to the
Department of Justice
Privacy Act Statement
The vast majority of the law enforcement officers in this country perform their very difficult jobs with
respect for their communities and in compliance with the law. Even so, there are incidents in which this is
not the case. This document outlines the laws enforced by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ)
that address police misconduct and explains how you can file a complaint with DOJ if you believe that
your rights have been violated.
Federal laws that address police misconduct include both criminal and civil statutes. These laws cover
the actions of State, county, and local officers, including those who work in prisons and jails. In addition,
several laws also apply to Federal law enforcement officers. The laws protect all persons in the United
States (citizens and non-citizens).
Each law DOJ enforces is briefly discussed below. In DOJ investigations, whether criminal or civil, the
person whose rights have been reportedly violated is referred to as a victim and often is an important
witness. DOJ generally will inform the victim of the results of the investigation, but we do not act as the
victim's lawyer and cannot give legal advice as a private attorney could.
The various offices within DOJ that are responsible for enforcing the laws discussed in this document
coordinate their investigation and enforcement efforts where appropriate. For example, a complaint
received by one office may be referred to another if necessary to address the allegations. In addition,
more than one office may investigate the same complaint if the allegations raise issues covered by more
than one statute.
What is the difference between criminal and civil cases?
Hints...
Feedback Form
Criminal and civil laws are different. Criminal cases usually are investigated and handled separately from
civil cases, even if they concern the same incident. In a criminal case, DOJ brings a case against the
accused person; in a civil case, DOJ brings the case (either through litigation or an administrative
investigation) against a governmental authority or law enforcement agency. In a criminal case, the
evidence must establish proof "beyond a reasonable doubt," while in civil cases the proof need only
satisfy the lower standard of a "preponderance of the evidence." Finally, in criminal cases, DOJ seeks to
punish a wrongdoer for past misconduct through imprisonment or other sanction. In civil cases, DOJ
seeks to correct a law enforcement agency's policies and practices that fostered the misconduct and,
where appropriate, may require individual relief for the victim(s).
Federal Criminal Enforcement

It is a crime for one or more persons acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive
another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (18 U.S.C.
241, 242). "Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by
a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under color of law" even
if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. The types of law enforcement misconduct covered by
these laws include excessive force, sexual assault, intentional false arrests, or the intentional fabrication
of evidence resulting in a loss of liberty to another. Enforcement of these provisions does not require that
any racial, religious, or other discriminatory motive existed.
What remedies are available under these laws?
Violations of these laws are punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. There is no private right of action
under these statutes; in other words, these are not the legal provisions under which you would file a
lawsuit on your own.
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page4666ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
2 of 4

67Gives
What
Federal Civil Enforcement

"Police Misconduct Provision"
This law makes it unlawful for State or local law enforcement officers to
engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights
protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (42 U.S.C.
14141). The types of conduct covered by this law can include, among other
things, excessive force, discriminatory harassment, false arrests, coercive
sexual conduct, and unlawful stops, searches or arrests. In order to be
covered by this law, the misconduct must constitute a "pattern or practice" -- it
may not simply be an isolated incident. The DOJ must be able to show in
court that the agency has an unlawful policy or that the incidents constituted
a pattern of unlawful conduct. However, unlike the other civil laws discussed
below, DOJ does not have to show that discrimination has occurred in order to
prove a pattern or practice of misconduct.
What remedies are available under this law?
The remedies available under this law do not provide for individual monetary
relief for the victims of the misconduct. Rather, they provide for injunctive
relief, such as orders to end the misconduct and changes in the agency's
policies and procedures that resulted in or allowed the misconduct. There is
no private right of action under this law; only DOJ may file suit for violations of
the Police Misconduct Provision.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

and the "OJP Program Statute"
Together, these laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, and religion
by State and local law enforcement agencies that receive financial assistance from the Department of
Justice. (42 U.S.C. 2000d, et seq. and 42 U.S.C. 3789d(c)). Currently, most persons are served by a
law enforcement agency that receives DOJ funds. These laws prohibit both individual instances and
patterns or practices of discriminatory misconduct, i.e., treating a person differently because of race,
color, national origin, sex, or religion. The misconduct covered by Title VI and the OJP (Office of Justice
Programs) Program Statute includes, for example, harassment or use of racial slurs, unjustified arrests,
discriminatory traffic stops, coercive sexual conduct, retaliation for filing a complaint with DOJ or
participating in the investigation, use of excessive force, or refusal by the agency to respond to
complaints alleging discriminatory treatment by its officers.
DOJ may seek changes in the policies and procedures of the agency to remedy violations of these laws
and, if appropriate, also seek individual remedial relief for the victim(s). Individuals also have a private
right of action under Title VI and under the OJP Program Statute; in other words, you may file a lawsuit
yourself under these laws. However, you must first exhaust your administrative remedies by filing a
complaint with DOJ if you wish to file in Federal Court under the OJP Program Statute.
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 prohibit discrimination against individuals with
disabilities on the basis of disability. (42 U.S.C. 12131, et seq. and 29 U.S.C. 794). These laws
protect all people with disabilities in the United States. An individual is considered to have a "disability" if
he or she has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities,
has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an impairment.
The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all State and local government programs,
services, and activities regardless of whether they receive DOJ financial assistance; it also protects
people who are discriminated against because of their association with a person with a disability. Section
504 prohibits discrimination by State and local law enforcement agencies that receive financial assistance
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page4767ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
3 of 4

68Gives
What
from DOJ. Section 504 also prohibits discrimination in programs and activities conducted by Federal
agencies, including law enforcement agencies.
These laws prohibit discriminatory treatment, including misconduct, on the basis of disability in virtually all
law enforcement services and activities. These activities include, among others, interrogating witnesses,
providing emergency services, enforcing laws, addressing citizen complaints, and arresting, booking, and
holding suspects. These laws also prohibit retaliation for filing a complaint with DOJ or participating in the
investigation.
If appropriate, DOJ may seek individual relief for the victim(s), in addition to changes in the policies and
procedures of the law enforcement agency. Individuals have a private right of action under both the ADA
and Section 504; you may file a private lawsuit for violations of these statutes. There is no requirement
that you exhaust your administrative remedies by filing a complaint with DOJ first.
How to File a Complaint with DOJ

Criminal Enforcement
If you would like to file a complaint alleging a violation of the criminal laws discussed above, you may
contact the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which is responsible for investigating allegations of
criminal deprivations of civil rights. You may also contact the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) in
your district. The FBI and USAOs have offices in most major cities and have publicly-listed phone
numbers. In addition, you may send a written complaint to:
Criminal Section
Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 66018
Washington, D.C. 20035-6018
Civil Enforcement
If you would like to file a complaint alleging violations of the Police Misconduct Statute, Title VI, or the
OJP Program Statute, you may send a written complaint to:
Coordination and Review Section
P.O. Box 66560
You may also call the Coordination and Review Section's toll-free number for information and a complaint
form, at (888) 848-5306 (voice and TDD).
If you would like to file a complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, you may send a
written complaint to:
Disability Rights Section
P.O. Box 66738
You may also call the Disability Rights Section's toll-free ADA Information Line at (800) 514-0301 (voice)
or (800) 514-0383 (TDD).
How do I file a complaint about the conduct of a law enforcement officer from a Federal agency?
If you believe that you are a victim of criminal misconduct by a Federal law enforcement officer (such as
the Immigration and Naturalization Service; the FBI; the Customs Service; Alcohol, Tobacco, and
Firearms; or the Border Patrol), you should follow the procedures discussed above concerning how to file
a complaint alleging violations of the criminal laws we enforce. If you believe that you have been
subjected by a Federal law enforcement officer to the type of misconduct discussed above concerning
"Federal Civil Enforcement," you may send a complaint to the Coordination and Review Section, at the
address listed above. That office will forward your complaint to the appropriate agency and office.
What information should I include in a complaint to DOJ?
Your complaint, whether alleging violations of criminal or civil laws listed in this document, should include
the following information:
Your name, address, and telephone number(s).
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page4868ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
4 of 4

69Gives
What
The name(s) of the law enforcement agency (or agencies) involved.
A description of the conduct you believe violates one of the laws discussed above, with as
many details as possible. You should include: the dates and times of incident(s); any
injuries sustained; the name(s), or other identifying information, of the officer(s) involved (if
possible); and any other examples of similar misconduct.
The names and telephone numbers of witnesses who can support your allegations.
If you believe that the misconduct is based on your race, color, national origin, sex,
religion, or disability, please identify the basis and explain what led you to believe that you
were treated in a discriminatory manner (i.e., differently from persons of another race, sex,
etc.).
Reproduction of this document is encouraged.
Return to Conduct of Law Enforcement Agencies Page

Return to Documents and Publications Page
Return to Special Litigation Section Home Page
Last updated October 13, 1999
Updated July 25, 2008
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
Police Dept.
Stan J. Caterbone
Allstate
Property
Claim
Page
189
Page4969ofof
69
Thursday
December
29, 2016
2016
Friday,
April 15,
11/23/2009 5:17 AM
Stan J. Caterbone
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
June 22, 2016
THEY WANT TO KILL ME
DECLARATION BY STAN J. CATERBONE re LANCASTER CITY

POLICE ACTIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF LATE
__________________________________________________
If you watch the video of the Press Conference by Stedman and Sadler you will notice that
Gregory S. Bayne, 35, a father of three , was minding his own business not bothering anyone. If
you research the availability of restrooms for the homeless, or anyone for that matter, you will
find that there are few if any. Now the only available are at the Lancaster City Police Station when
Central Market is not opened. The Red Rose Transit Station closed thiers to the public due to
continued vandalism. Now, all the Lancaster City Police had to do was to give Gregory Byne a
simple warning and treat him not as an inconvenience, but rather as someone who was having
difficulty navigating life at that time. Remember how many people became just like Gregory
Bayne after the RECESSION of 2007. There are many still without jobs from that era. MOST
IMPORTANTLY, NOTICE THE POSTURE OF THE 2 POLICE OFFICERS IT WAS THAT OF
AGGRESSION FROM THE START.
THIS IS WHAT THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE WANT TO DO TO ME, NO DOUBT IN
MY MIND AND THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO PROVE OTHERWISE GIVEN THE ATTACK BY
THE PIT BULL ON JUNE 10, AND THE STALKING OF 8 OR SO POLICE DURING THE PRIDE
FEST ON SUNDAY JUNE 19 th WHEN TODD UMSTEAD AND COMPANY SURROUNDED ME IN
A CIRCLE FOR NO REASON AND THEN JUST WALKED AWAY WHEN THE DID NOT GET
WHAT THE WANTED, WHATEVER THAT WAS.
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
Page 50 of 189
District Attorney: Police Shooting of

homeless man was 'clearly
justified'
JEFF HAWKES Staff Writer
Jun 28, 2013
A police officer was justified in fatally shooting a homeless man who lunged at another officer with a
9-inch knife, the district attorney announced Friday, saying he would not prosecute the officer.
The shooting happened June 10 in downtown Lancaster after police stopped the man for urinating in
public.
"The officers involved showed restraint, critical decision-making and attempts to de-escalate the level
of force prior to the fatal shot," District Attorney Craig Stedman said. "This case is closed."
DOCUMENT: Read district attorney's report into shooting
Stedman said his decision to clear Officer Jose De La Torre came after he reviewed surveillance videos
and statements by the police and civilian eyewitnesses. Mayor Rick Gray, a former attorney, agreed
with Stedman's decision.
Gregory S. Bayne, 35, a father of three, suffered a single gunshot wound to the side of the abdomen
and bled to death at Lancaster General Hospital a couple of hours after the shooting, which happened
Page 51 of 189
about 7:20 a.m. in the alcove to Place Marie, 52-56 N. Queen St., authorities said.
The incident began about 7 a.m. when two officers approached Bayne at Lancaster Square in the 100
block of North Queen Street after a surveillance camera operator spotted him urinating against a
column.
The video shows Bayne taking a knife out of his pocket and charging out of the camera frame toward
De La Torre, who Stedman said was on his radio checking for warrants. De La Torre fired once, but
missed.
De La Torre and Officer David Kaminski then chased Bayne into the first block of North Queen Street.
Part of the chase was caught on a private security camera. It shows Kaminski at North Queen and
Orange streets firing a Taser electroshock weapon. The barb hit Bayne but did not stop him.
Cornered at the locked entrance of Place Marie, Bayne refused to obey the police and drop his knife,
Stedman said. Instead, Bayne, knife in hand, lunged at Officer Andrew Nauman, who had joined the
chase. De La Torre fired twice, hitting Bayne once.
Video from a security camera at the entrance to Yorgos Restaurant, 66 N. Queen St., shows Bayne and
officers in front of Place Marie, but only from the waist down. It shows Bayne moving toward an
officer and then collapsing to the sidewalk, felled by the bullet.
The fallen Bayne did not release the knife. An officer had to kick it from his hand. Bayne further
resisted arrest by keeping his hands under his body, Stedman said.
The 9-inch folding knife had a 4-inch blade. "This is obviously not a table butter knife," Stedman said,
displaying the knife. "It is an extremely dangerous weapon."
Stedman issued a 14-page report, released videos and answered media questions. The investigation was
conducted by city Detective Lt. Jarrad Berkihiser.
The district attorney said it "would have been beyond irresponsible" if the officers had allowed an
agitated, 6-foot, 3-inch, 220-pound man with a dangerous knife to escape downtown at morning rush
hour. He said it would have been "equally absurd" to try to wrestle the knife from Bayne. "The third
and only reasonable choice left was to shoot," he said.
Stedman said important evidence came from a man in a car stopped directly in front of Place Marie.
The civilian witness, who Stedman did not identify, saw the chase and fatal shooting. The driver told
investigators he believed the officers acted appropriately.
"They yelled at him. They tried Tasers. He had plenty of time in all of that to drop the knife," said
Stedman, reading from the witness's statement to investigators. "He lunged at them with the knife," the
driver said, according to Stedman, "and only then they shot him."
Neither Kaminski nor Nauman fired their service weapons. Kaminski, however, did fire a Taser X26
twice. He was the only responding officer carrying a Taser.
People who knew Bayne told reporters that he drifted between Lancaster and California and was a
generous, intelligent and resourceful man. They also said he made irrational comments suggestive of
mental illness.
But Stedman said investigators talked to someone who knew Bayne for many years and who described
the homeless man as volatile. He also told police that Bayne's behavior on June 10 "didn't surprise
him."
At the news conference, Police Chief Keith Sadler said the officers followed proper police procedure,
Page 52 of 189
even after they suspected that Bayne was mentally disturbed.

The chief said De La Torre and Kaminski were not familiar with Bayne when they approached him in
Lancaster Square. The officers heard Bayne rambling bizarrely, mentioning aliens. Within seconds,
Bayne pulled the knife.
"You cannot commit somebody (to a mental health unit) just for rambling," Sadler said.
Sadler and Stedman said the officers repeatedly showed restraint and that shooting Bayne was a last
resort Bayne provoked by lunging with his knife, first at Lancaster Square, then at Place Marie.
Sadler said that as Bayne fled Lancaster Square, Kaminski "had a clear shot at him but he didn't take it"
for fear of hitting a vehicle or pedestrian on Queen Street.
Kaminski during the chase shot Bayne with a Taser barb that Bayne pulled out while he continued to
run.
Jumping out of his patrol car at the intersection of North Queen and Orange streets, Officer Nauman
joined the chase, calling Bayne by name because he recognized him.
When the three officers cornered Bayne at Place Marie's entrance, they ordered him to drop his knife
and get on the ground. When Bayne didn't comply, Kaminski fired his Taser again, but missed. It was
his last Taser barb.
Sadler said the officers were correct not to try to subdue a knife-wielding man with their two-foot
collapsible nightsticks. "They don't have the luxury of getting a do-over in case they miss trying to get
(the knife) out of his hand," Sadler said.
The officers also carry Mace, a tear-gas spray, but Sadler said it would have been "ludicrous" to try to
subdue Bayne with Mace. He said Mace is known to not be effective against the mentally disturbed or
those in an agitated state.
Sadler also said the officers' Kevlar vests protect against gunfire, but not a knife attack. "It may protect
you from a slicing wound," but not "from a penetrating wound," he said.
The encounter at Place Marie lasted mere seconds. Stedman said Bayne turned and faced Nauman
about 10 feet away. Nauman stood between De La Torre and Kaminski.
The officers commanded Bayne to drop the knife or he would be Tased. Kaminski then fired the Taser,
but missed.
Locking eyes with Nauman, Bayne went toward him with the knife. De La Torre pulled his trigger but
missed. With Bayne continuing his attack, De La Torre fired a second shot about a second after the
first. The second shot felled Bayne.
Stedman said Nauman had drawn his .40-caliber Glock handgun and was ready to shoot, but De La
Torre shot first.
"I can't speculate on what's going on in (Bayne's) mind," Stedman said, "but the police officers don't
have to wait to find out with a knife in their throat. They've got a right to stand their ground, as
civilians do. There's no question in my mind they did what they had to do. It's a difficult choice, and a
person's life is lost unfortunately."
Stedman said the officers complied with Pennsylvania law in their decision to use deadly force. The
law says an officer is justified in using deadly force to prevent death or serious injury or to prevent the
escape of an armed and dangerous person who has committed a serious violent crime.
"This isn't a close call," Stedman said.
Page 53 of 189
Gray, a former attorney who attended the news conference, said he agrees with the district attorney's
decision.
Bayne "used a deadly weapon in an offensive manner," said Gray, describing the video showing
Bayne's initial attack at Lancaster Square as "frightening."
Gray said he expected to receive Sadler's separate report on police procedure in the incident by
Monday.
De La Torre was one of four officers who fatally shot a suspected armed robber in July 1999 at Green
and Pershing streets. De La Torre and the other officers were cleared after that incident.
The last time a city police officer shot and killed someone was 2003.
Page 54 of 189
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
June 22, 2016
Dr. Mastropietro, System Chief Medical Officer
Lancaster Regional Medical Center,
250 College Ave
Lancaster, PA 17603
Re:
Our Encounter at Turkey Hill on Columbia Avenue on June 20, 2016 and my
Mental Health Record
Dear Dr. Mastropietro,

As far as I can see, I was under your care dating back to 1981. We have had a long
relationship and you unfortunately refuse to understand my situation and believe me when I tell
you that I am a Victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control. We have had many conversations, even in
your office at Lancaster Regional Medical Center, as the System Chief Medical Officer. I have
entered the U.S. Federal Court System on May 16, 2005 all in an effort to undo the fabricated
mental health history that you and Dr. Al Shulz have helped to promote, along with a long list of
other medical professionals, including the powerful Lancaster General Health Organization.
What has struck me as an important fact that I just a few minutes ago unearthed is your
past service in the U.S. Navy. That is, of course, the same service of my father, Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr., and his father, Samuel Caterbone, Sr. of Book Road, West Lampeter. Now the Navy
has an extensive public record regarding it's role in developing some of the technologies and
weapons of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, and of course my father has stated in writing on several
documents to me that his experimentation began while he was serving as an Aerial Gunner in the
years 1943 to 1946.
For the record, for years I too was under the belief that I was suffering from a mental
illness. The propaganda and brainwashing machine of the responsible parties was and still is very
effective. And, I, the foolish one again, putting my trust in someone not deserving, set the
fabricated mental health record in motion in December of 1986. I was having a problem with my
partners at Financial Management Group, Ltd., that year. After I founded and developed that
company, my partners decided that I was no longer useful, or should I say, they wanted what I
had built, lock, stock and barrel, so to speak. Now, after further analysis, I am beginning to think
that it was not their ideal after all, but something much more cynical and much more criminal. It
might just have been the Good Old Boys, or the Manheim Township Police, or the power elite of
Lancaster, or the powers to be of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control. Take your pick, I am stating for
the record, there is no way possible it was just another insider company takeover, especially
considering that in 1983 Gibson Armstrong solicited me to buy 1000 shares of International Signal
and Control, plc., That may have been part of a much broader master plan, in and above itself.
Now, back to December of 1986, given my knowledge of my family history, the fabricated
Letter to Dr. A.v.Mastropietro

CATERBONE
Lancaster City Police Dept.
Page
Page55
1 of 189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016
history, I was diligent in seeking the advice of my client, Dr. Al Shulz when I began to feel down
from the attempted takeover of my stock, my positions, and ultimately my career. I remember Al
saying well Stan, given your extraordinary efforts and results in developing and putting on the
Eastern Regional Football Camp for the USFL, CFL, and NFL; the efforts and results of building
Financial Management Group, Ltd., and your success in building the Central Pennsylvania Chapter
of the International Association for Financial Planners, you must be suffering from Bi Polar
Disease. They played me like a fiddle. Anyway, I went to my brother Steve's home in Miami
Florida for Christmas Week, relaxed and came home and went back to work. I put together the
Digital Movie, my mortgage banking consortium for commercial real estate projects, and
eventually in the spring of 1987, for all practical purposes took control of the Financial
Management Group, Ltd., Board of Directors by swaying Alan Loss and Robert Long to vote
against Bob Kauffman and Mike Hartlett in the Planners Securities Group merger.
Then, on June 23, 1987 Mr. Larry Resch, from Untied Chem Con and International Signal
and Control, plc, or ISC came to visit and the rest is history. Enclosed are a host of documents to
prove my allegations and without a shadow of a doubt, totally eliminate any notion that I have
ever suffered from any form of mental illness. You are formally on notice that the next time you
discuss my mental health history in public, it will be civil and criminal slander and libel.
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Dr. Mastropietro Bio
Dr. Mastropietro truly enjoys his position as the System Chief Medical Officer at both
Lancaster Regional and Heart of Lancaster Regional Medical Centers and is regarded as a
leader in medicine in Lancaster County. He has nearly 40 years of practice in family medicine in
the County and is also a former owner of Mastropietro & Associates on Noll Drive. Chances are,
you, a member of your family or a friend have been treated by Dr. Mastropietro over the years!
A native of Thornwood, New York in Westchester County, Dr. Mastropietro attended Villanova
University for his undergraduate degree, Georgetown University for his Medical Degree, served in
the US Navy, and completed his residency right here in Lancaster County. He has also served on
countless local medical boards and committees throughout the County during his long career in
medicine.
Married and a father, in his spare time, Dr. Mastropietro loves to read history, study politics and
religion, cook and eat Italian food, enjoy wine and is also a big fan of the NY Yankees and NY
Giants. (He jokes that all of those, with the exception of his love of history, will surely get him into
trouble!) He also states that he used to be athletic, but having had many parts replaced, hes now
more sports spectator than participant.

CATERBONE
Page
Page56
2 of 189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page57
3 of 189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page58
4 of 189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page59
5 of 189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page60
6 of 189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page61
7 of 189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page62
8 of 189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page63
9 of 189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page64
10of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page65
11of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page66
12of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page67
13of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page68
14of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page69
15of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page70
16of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page71
17of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page72
18of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page73
19of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page74
20of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page75
21of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page76
22of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page77
23of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page78
24of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page79
25of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page80
26of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page81
27of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016

CATERBONE
Page
Page82
28of
of189
28
85
Thursday December
June 22,
29, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
April 20, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography

Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.
In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International Signal
and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted in 1992 for
an elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad array of weapons,
most notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at that time. I have been a
victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005.
I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned into an all-out
assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts
of personal property, extortions, intellectual property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due
process; thefts and modifications of court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed
energy devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted
victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal
action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy.
The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with
the same person who declares telepathically she is a known celebrity. Over the course of 10 years I
have been telepathic with at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate and
confirm their identities without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment and act on the
numerous formal complaints that are filed in their respective offices. Most complaints are focused on
the routine victimization's of a targeted individual including but not limited to stalking, harassment,
threats, vandalism, thefts, extortion, burglaries, false imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants
or involuntary commitments, pain and torture to the body, and most often the cause of obstruction of
justice is the computer hacking.
I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was in the U.S.
Navy after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Florida, including an affidavit motorized
and authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air force and was victim to LSD
experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.
In 2015 I filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in 1992 of the
murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her book titled
Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on Amazon.com. I
am in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stan J.to
Letter
CATERBONE
Caterbone/Advanced
Dr. A.v.Mastropietro
Lancaster City
Media
Police
Group
Dept.
BiographyPage
Page
Page
83
29
1of
of189
685
Thursday
Wednesday,
December
June
April 22,
20,
29, 2016
In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL
to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster
Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim
Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will
provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and
assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured,
and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy
weapons. I again reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented
the Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which I still do to this day.
In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT" on the
NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service financial firm,
Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for his company and
the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton
Financial. I have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to
various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and the subprime failures.
I believe that Fulton Financial needs management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning
and the performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder value.
Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is
consistent with the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking
institutions acquired by larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in
it's local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District
Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference
of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital
Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along
with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal
and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South
Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was
solicited by ISC executives for professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of
RICO Civil Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot. We also
proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and Lancaster
Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is finally under
construction with a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after submission of
an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief Executive Officer of
the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such
organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative,
Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope, People to
People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric
Center, and numerous others.
Stan J.to
Letter
CATERBONE
Caterbone/Advanced
Lancaster City
Media
Police
Group
Dept.
BiographyPage
Page
Page
84
30
2of
of189
685
Thursday
Wednesday,
December
June
April 22,
20,
29, 2016
In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an emphasis
on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the fight against
electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to address the
convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those
creating, promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless networks.
In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of the
AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the company
wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading project that
lasted until 2004 with success.
In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as
the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was developed in
conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of Downtown
Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt & Shand building.
In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the effects
of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the U.S. Sponsored Y2K
symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K Subcommittee and Senator
William Bennett.
In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization
promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding
for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention
Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based charities.
The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit organizations, faith based
initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational support for the prevention of suicide and to bring
awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was controller of
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to computerized their
accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided consulting for the
computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was
retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the Informations Technologies of the Jay
Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West
Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies
hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based
real time networking system throughout the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees
some 500 employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving the
company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was
facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were responsible for
implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human
resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and
negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since
it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County
demanded a complete accounting of the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans
it was holding. We essentially revamped the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an
increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and record revenues.
Stan J.to
Letter
CATERBONE
Caterbone/Advanced
Lancaster City
Media
Police
Group
Dept.
BiographyPage
Page
Page
85
31
3of
of189
685
Thursday
Wednesday,
December
June
April 22,
20,
29, 2016
In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program, which
was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To give
specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively
communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific, technical,
and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State
Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled
to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with
scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments technology think
tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article Escaping the Unix
Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC, then one of the leading
publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you
call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving
telecommunications.
In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic
companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial
companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services
and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology
(NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the
Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore
Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R,
Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a
major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications for
the internet and is often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had
arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly.
We had brokered a deal and the executives from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to
discuss the deal and perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield
Industrial Park.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive producer
of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the
first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the
Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula
of the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry
featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead
patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony
Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station
Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon
Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper,
Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station
Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was
released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had
developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the Digital
Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization
of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with the
release of the Digital Movie.
Stan J.to
Letter
CATERBONE
Caterbone/Advanced
Lancaster City
Media
Police
Group
Dept.
BiographyPage
Page
Page
86
32
4of
of189
685
Thursday
Wednesday,
December
June
April 22,
20,
29, 2016
I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the
technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station
Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a
compact disc.
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major
banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars.
Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across
the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both
debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private placements,
and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood,
California to secure financing of their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North
Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the
midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and
discussions with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were
quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of
other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High
Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We
were constantly told that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services organization
comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase
program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had
financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services,
tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one
year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and our
advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees from the
other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4
million.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting departments.
(See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant on the team
scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of video taping the
camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting departments for
teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa
Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues
most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino
was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players
Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp,
while we were at a Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article
about our camp and associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices.
Actually, that was the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the
country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants,
with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a
professional production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video.
The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys,
had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he looked
forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.
Stan J.to
Letter
CATERBONE
Caterbone/Advanced
Lancaster City
Media
Police
Group
Dept.
BiographyPage
Page
Page
87
33
5of
of189
685
Thursday
Wednesday,
December
June
April 22,
20,
29, 2016
In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times.
We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms.
Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals
attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong
discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most
effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers,
accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has
become evident that financial planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us
from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi Group (the
largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help advise on the future
of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the investment industry at large. Mr.
Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified
Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in delivering Fee Based Financial
Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment community and mainstream investors.
That concept is now widely held by most investment advisers.
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
Stan J.to
Letter
CATERBONE
Caterbone/Advanced
Lancaster City
Media
Police
Group
Dept.
BiographyPage
Page
Page
88
34
6of
of189
685
Thursday
Wednesday,
December
June
April 22,
20,
29, 2016
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
89
135
11of
1of
of
1of
of
51
51
of
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
22,
29, 2016
2015

scaterbone@live.com
https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)669-2163
PRESS RELEASE
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED
STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of
Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been
working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as
protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.
Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will
help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic
telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United
States federal and state courts.
We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this
legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.
For More Information Please Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com and visit our library of
documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone
_________________________________________________
The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
90
236
22
1of
2of
of
2of
of
151
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
91
337
33
2of
3of
of
3of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016
Capitol Office
State Capitol
Jefferson City Mo.
573-751-0246
District Office
Second Street
King City Mo.
660-535-6664
May 21, 2009

To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly
by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical
injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on
men, women, and even children.
I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use
of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.
Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their
knowledge or consent.
There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of
Veri-chip and RF signals.
I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.
Sincerely,
Rep. Jim Guest
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
92
438
44
3of
4of
of
4of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
Section 1. Short Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill
Section 2. Findings and Purpose
A) Findings
1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration
of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among
these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought
"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for
this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most
comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further
asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.
4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to
Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or
Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings,
declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the
Convention.
B) Purpose
To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,
directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to
purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury,
harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.
Section 3. Organized Stalking
If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously
harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in
reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of
the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one
year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,
or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a)
against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,
or four years.
For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of
conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the
person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. *
**
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
93
539
55
4of
5of
of
5of
of
251
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016

For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a
period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected
activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern
of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and
conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear
for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and
made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal
property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually
carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to
prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the
meaning of "credible threat."
For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic
telepathy devices.
The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any
contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the
intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of
the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his
or her immediate family.
For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person
related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly
resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.
Section 4. Punishment for threats
Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in
writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if
there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in
which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the
person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or
her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed
one year..
For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or
not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly
resided in the household.
"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices
Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other
person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the
person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a
misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made
in good faith.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
94
640
66
5of
6of
of
6of
of
351
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016

(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her
residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or
electronic contacts made in good faith.
(c)
Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her
place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand
dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both
that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic
contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following
circumstances exist:
(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.
(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of
an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of
work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from
making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic
contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former
spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a
dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.
(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where
the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic
communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed
when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the
recipient.
(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b),
or (c) upon receiving the return call.
(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person
or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the
person participate in counseling.
(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not
limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or
synthetic telepathy devices.
Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault
upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten
thousand dollars ($10,000).
For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that
directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF)
energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
95
741
77
6of
7of
of
7of
of
451
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016

mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or
space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies
directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood
management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
96
842
88
7of
8of
of
8of
of
551
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016
Richmond council passes resolution

supporting ban on space-based
weapons
May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore
9 comments
The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based
weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically
and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.
Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),
introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident
who claims shes been targeted by remote transmission from space-based weaponry.
Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around
the country to speak at Tuesdays council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been
zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.
The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning space-based weapons, even though the legislation first introduced
by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that
Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a
decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.
Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry
such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly
emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA
members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.
RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of
the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two
yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.
Im going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
97
943
99
8of
9of
of
9of
of
851
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016
dumb ideas, Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based
weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing
city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the
past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda
regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.
The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.
The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that
supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from longrange missiles might not be wise.
Pimple disputed what he called knee-jerk reactions from RPA members who depicted
President Ronald Reagans proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as
the Star Wars initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to
defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the projects
moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.
The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, is you can knock out someones weapons long
before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds
targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.
RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the
individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for
the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well
be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college
that predicted truths 20 years in advance.
Its easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the
wrong mindset, Martinez said.
Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesnt support war.
The weaponization of spaceis something I think is extremely immoral and we should
not be as a nation engaging in, Myrick said. Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that
may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset..thats
why I support this resolution.
Amy Lee Anderson, a targeted individual who brought the matter to Beckles attention,
was thankful that the council took up the issue.
No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support, Anderson
said. We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are
dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. Its hard for someone who has
no experience to fathom it, its so sophisticated.
Related posts:
1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning exotic space-based

weapons
2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones
Comments
1. Cmon Richmond Standard.your bias is showing!

Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
10
98
10
44
10
910
10
of
of
of
9of
51
51
of
50
189
51
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
October 10, 2015
Federal Whistleblower
and
Targeted Individual (Victim)
of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary
Updated on October 10, 2015
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media
Group are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both
Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and
his Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he
founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblower
when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer
and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and
plead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via
South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus
Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
11
99
11
45
10
11
11
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
189
50
51
85
51
51
Page
111
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,
&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
copyright 2009
Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding
it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or the
Hatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards
America and the West?
See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, a
U.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this
HATRED towards America.
Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to my
www.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most
prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":
http://ikhwanscope.net/main/
There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a week
or so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.
You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the
U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and our
Troops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I
Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. What
do you believe in?
Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010
Date Updated:
October 10, 2015
Date Completed:
Date Initiated:
July 28, 2009

July 8, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
100
12
12
46
11
12
12
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
212
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,
state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,
trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest.
From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary
Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and
rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz.
The
psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion.
By
the
end
of
the
summer
of
2010
every
social
media
site,
including
the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.
In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group.
And Again, the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.
On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of.
The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct
witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert.
In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 153400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
101
13
13
47
12
13
13
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
313
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.
Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia.
However, this time there was
no
MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a
desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far
as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions
of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.
On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman.
The Complaint contained
allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact.
The Lancaster City Police
Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.
On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.
In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.
In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis.
The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
102
14
14
48
13
14
14
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
414
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45
audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone.
In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.
In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family.
Phil interviewed all living
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
103
15
15
49
14
15
15
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
515
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
HISTORY
In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal
and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred.
After discussions with ISC and United
Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since
1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which
resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public
allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials
and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the
selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein.
However, money, power,
influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims
Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of
all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and
local laws.
This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most
valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-ToWork under federal statutes.
Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years.
This
includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.
Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state.
ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies
since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National
Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.
In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding
SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:
INTERNATIONAL
Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
104
16
16
50
15
16
16
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
616
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:
George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of
Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con
scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great
Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel
regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq
story and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert
Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,
with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by
Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &
Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph
Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not
believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal
counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, County.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
105
17
17
51
16
17
17
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
717
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James
Guerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police
Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007
Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.
Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.
THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;
burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender
liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had
to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape.
uncovered and discovered to this day.
Information and findings are still being
Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury
investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these
activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The
pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over
time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order
to perpetrate the cover-up:
Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort
any monies and/or possessions of value.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
106
18
18
52
17
18
18
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
818
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM
For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges.
During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least
twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of
specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited
and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are
now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted
these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved
such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or
their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and
the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.
However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv2288.
This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security
of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May
16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.
One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.
These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
107
19
19
53
18
19
19
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
919
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND

WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic.
Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.
This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action
in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The
main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is
connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment.
See attached documents for
more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
108
20
20
54
19
20
20
20
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
10
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like
the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business.
He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and
Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his
father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as
his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and
finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and
had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services
industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue
everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is
against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and
has delusions about his success as a businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner.
Samuel Caterbone,
Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is
most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA
or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions
with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that
were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school
documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
109
21
21
55
20
21
21
21
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
11
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well
as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a
successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the
solvents.
He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was
definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities.
His
viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized
stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a
world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a
covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history
laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City
Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
In 1973 Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking
account.
The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never
entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster
Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his
only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President
Judge William Johnstone.
However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone
wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the
County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more
on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his
life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised
from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of
his record online.
On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an
inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate.
The check was for some $70,000.00.
The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend
of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him.
He was in perfect
health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per
Julianne McKinney,
former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and the one thing that I worry
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
110
22
22
56
21
22
22
22
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
12
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

about is that of dying of cancer (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was
a murder, not natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.
In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel
A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,
with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992.
By his own
admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"
trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others
questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately
responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than
suicide.
Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending
Lancaster Catholic High School.
After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an
unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November.
While in the woods in
Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm.
It left him in the
Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation.
hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life.
The
The Schizophrenia
diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set
a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic
Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.
Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and
lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.
FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this
day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the
Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey
and Franklin and Marshall College.
Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and
landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and
selling residential mortgages.
John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by
James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars
of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
111
23
23
57
22
23
23
23
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
13
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High
School.
Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a
federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries
and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and
will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his
legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,
without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most
likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster
Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B
grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in
computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and
continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business
administration in 1980.
Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first
beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power
Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd..
Over the
years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of
impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they
were sold.
The same was true of his businesses.
Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in
very short fashion.
There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,;
every instance of the word
used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005
by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302
Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary
appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
112
24
24
58
23
24
24
24
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
14
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE
v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.
THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;
Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000
pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary
offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and
several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as
plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local
courts.
There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County
Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High
School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his
court filings.
For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service
records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social
Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;
and papers and documents persevered from his estate.
For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster
Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County
Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and
documents persevered from his estate
PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.freedomffchs.com
https://www.scribd.com
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
113
25
25
59
24
25
25
25
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
15
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW

** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently
been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are
using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is
often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.
Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay
secretive for so long.
This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television
drama "Medium" this last season.
On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live
broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist
turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.
Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
The following are no longer in service:
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
114
26
26
60
25
26
26
26
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
16
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

September 7, 2009
Stan J. Caterbone
Advance Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603
Derrick Robinson
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
P.O. Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
Phone 1-800-571-5618
Fax 1-866-433-4170
email: info@freedomfchs.com
Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and
Covert Surveillance?
Derrick,
My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center
Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to
send your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,
unless you think the exposure would be harmful.
I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me
here in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the
country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras across
Lancaster City making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article
attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.
I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking and
harassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some
history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in our
new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint
venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.
American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the
CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in the
domestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the
Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,
see
attached.
Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were
several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,
which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.
Click here for an overview of ISC.
Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or
ISC.
Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening
of the ISC indictments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ Billion
Dollar Fraud.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
115
27
27
61
26
27
27
27
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
17
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.
Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of
the oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administration
has a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with
ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &
Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline
regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained in
my Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his
relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert
Gates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forth
questions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members
of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISC
and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa
and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.
Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here a
few months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,
Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.
Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,
National Security Agency:
"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a supersecret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listening
posts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSA
made sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma
Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in
1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms
to stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some
civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify its
efforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its
top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been the
father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense
structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began
regular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,
1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.
Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, from
January 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,
including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegal
and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the
agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy
Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of
remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according to
Wikipedia.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),
former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control
industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
116
28
28
62
27
28
28
28
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
18
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via
their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big time
defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.
Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."
by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a
member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or
approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).
Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:
George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.
James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of
International Signal & Control, (ISC).
My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.
His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.
George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).
George W. Bush flew with the Navy.
James Cross
I will Finish later and add more.
Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was Joseph
Tate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin
and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in
1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letter
involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame
and eventually outing her.
Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense Intelligence
Agency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and
airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way to
California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense
Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me
confirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's
Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents for
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military bases
before releasing me.
In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me
at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a training
exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield
Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks
longer than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.
We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her new
album, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed
by other telepathic assailants.
My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was
hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,
who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon
after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.
I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
117
29
29
63
28
29
29
29
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
19
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Stan J. Caterbone
scaterbone@live.com
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
118
30
30
64
29
30
30
30
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
20
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
AFFIDAVIT
BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science
Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal
age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:
I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed
to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone
was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words.
The
whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning
by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited
me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my
demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that
the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in
financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders
and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.
And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as
S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my
immediate family, friends, and relatives.
Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies
would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT
is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
119
31
31
65
21
30
31
31
31
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
41
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Saturday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
October
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
10,
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
120
32
32
66
31
32
32
32
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
121
33
33
67
32
33
33
33
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
122
34
34
68
33
34
34
34
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2016
scaterbone@live.com
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
December 6, 2015
Work-In-Progress
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
123
35
35
69
35
35
35
of
of
ofof
51
51
of
51
189
85
51
51
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
17,
15,
22,
29, 2016
2015
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian
Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on my
Wordpress Blog.
20.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
22.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
23.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
24.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
25.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.
26.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Northwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,
Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged in
Discrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to Legal
Counsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.
27.Southeast Medical Facilities and Brightside Church Office, February 2016, Would not
issue pain medication and filed a Private Criminal Complaint with the Lancaster County
District Attorney, no opinion as of yet.
28.U.S. Federal Facilities per the National Security Agency Interrogation of March 9, 2016
at the NSA Headquarters in Ft. Meade, Maryland. Handcuffed and Interrogated for over an
hour and finally let go and told not to continue on to Washington, D.C. And said I was no
longer permitted to visit any U.S. Federal Facilities.
Dated: March 15, 2016
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Mastropietro
Lancaster
Group
Executive
Executive
Executive
City
Summary
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
124
36
36
70
3636
of
of
of51
51
of
51
189
8551
Tuesday,
Thursday
Tuesday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
15,
22,
29, 2016
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
125
37
37
71
36
37
37
37
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
27
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
126
38
38
72
37
38
38
38
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
28
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
127
39
39
73
38
39
39
39
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
29
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
! "
"
$% &
!
" #
%
"&#
(
'
!
(
,
"
"
")
"
""
-
)
!
! "
!
'
%
" !
"
!
)
+
!
" *
"
"
,
,
,
*
%
*
(
%
!
/"0
1
1 ,
"
"
4
!
"
"
!
!
#
.
.
&,,0
%
1 ,
2"3
!
)
** ! "
&,,..$/
&,,
%
&,,
%
&
, "
"
00
"
!,
"
6
7
7 , !
&,,-
8,
:
(
$;$
"2
! " ,
, ,
** !
;
5
$
!
&,,@
,
.
&<;=
>
1
9
,
&,,=
$
,
>
A
1 B3
.+
&,,=
1 B3
2
>
%
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
128
40
40
74
39
40
40
40
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
30
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
<
1
1
* "
!
"
C#
"$
"
<
*
&, ,
24
#9
; "
&,,@(&,,= A
3
24
5
!
%
&,,0 4
! %3
"
"
!
&,,
%
!
4
'
5
4
D
%
%
"
""
,! "
0 =
0 =9
9
00&9 00
:
9
&,,-
&, , $
!
%
!
D
%
%
=
F
!
))
+
/4
),
"
0 =
/
$
G
3
%
00
3
3
"
%#
$
$
&, ,
&,,4
!- "
.
&,,@
,
*
&,,<
E
&,,
-) !
/ 4
24
/
$
D
&, ,
D
$
&,,-
&,,0
%
D
!
D
D %
7F !
>
!
D
$
A
8F
$
%
;
D
.
%
&,,3
E
$
*
00=; 00
$
5
! 7
0 =
00
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
129
41
41
75
40
41
41
41
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
31
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
)
A
24
$;$
00
(F
&
%
B
5
00 9
" * <
00=( 00 9
:#
> ) "" ""

$
;3
#, " !
&,,-
"
"
"
0 =
&, ,
/
.
$
B
3
3
=
0 =
) "
.
&,,1
0 =
24
" "
3
"
&,,@
" E
""
B
$
<
&,,1
.
&,,-
,-(&&
2
=
@,
"
&,
3
&,,!
&,,@
&,,@
0 =
@, 1
&,,@
9
!
@,
#" !,
0 =
" "1 ,
"
"*
":
" E
F
&,,-
!
B
/
!
"
00=( 00 9
B
:
9
$
'
.
&,,1
9
0 =
&, ,
/
.
00 9
/
&,,9
&,
( "
!
.
00
$
!
&, ,
F
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
3
7
8
!
&,,
&, ,
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
130
42
42
76
41
42
42
42
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
32
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
&
, * "
&&
*#
"
&:
;!
&<
:
%
$
&, ,
$
&,,-
!-
,
5
%
"
>
$
$
< !-
24
? "
;
>
&,,0
B
&,,%
(
$
&, ,
&-
A
.+ $
&@
! :
&,,$
: , *
&, ,
* @
&,,@
"
E
3
&,,
"
&,,0
7 "!
7 "
0 =
*
&=
) "
":
)"
&,,@
"
&
&0
!
< ")
+
9 &,,@
:
9
&, ,
&,,
00
:,
!6
"
"
" .
9 &,,0
0 = "&#
, *
&,,@
/
" F
0 =
;A
0 =
F
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
0 =
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
131
43
43
77
42
43
43
43
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
33
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

!
3
"
$
+
$
.
0 =
I $
!
0 =
.
$
"2
'
+$;F
D
"$
&,;&,
3
A
00
'
$ 24
"1E1# $
K
E
A
00&
>
L
F
F
B
F
+
0=,K
A
$
$
1
+
>
1
$
>
B
!
3
F
1
00
) % 3
&,,-
!
>
! A !
00,K
1 B3
>
F
F
& 1
F
8
! 4
'
A
! 4
A
0=,K
F
00,K
0 ,K
0<,K
3
/
>
%
&,,
) %$
D 1
"
$
0 <9 F
0@,K
0@,K
$
2!
A? D!B
#
*
$
7
+
00
D 18
.
E
$
M 1
00= E
0 =
%
0 ,K
$
0 =
M
00
!
&,,9
(
9
!
1
,-(
$ !2B+EF2
(&&
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
132
44
44
78
43
44
44
44
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
34
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
") !
"
7!
N
.
!
5
F
(
(
5
G
*
A'
, ?
*
? 1
!,
A
(
> "
!, '!
,
B
A
" " * #" !, " "
$C
* #" !, D
73
8
* 7
,
"
"
&
"
#
.
"
#(
5
7
9
'
5
%
7A
8 !
8 !
'
!
7D .2
O
% 8
'
7
'
(
(
%
%
4
K
K
M %
%
K
'
7E
(
8
"
%
'
%(
(
(
4
;
(
7
7
87
(
(
8
8
- 7 > !,
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
133
45
45
79
44
45
45
45
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
35
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,

!
* , "
!
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
.
.
&
B
B
B
B
B
@
E
@
E
&. @
DD
@
. DD
"
@
& DD
@
. DD
@
& DD
@
$ DD
@
DD
@
E
DD
@
EB& DD
@
EB DD
@
& B DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
@
& DD
@
DD
B@
)
B@
DD
!
!
))
1"
)
*
!
")
1
3
1
"
)
)
, "
*"
"
, "
!
*
"
")
"
7
"!
"
*
!
*
")
!
6, "
1
5
)
>
' "
*
, "
1 ,!
, "
)
!
"
"
!
!
1
"": !
1 , 1
"": !
"
1
"": !
!
"
! * !
)
*
"E
DD
")
E DD
%
,
!
!"
, "
"
"
"
1 ,"
DD
*)
PPPPPPP "
>7
%#
'?
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
"
June 19, 2015

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
$
Lancaster
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
19
PPPPPPP
15
June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
&,PP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98

PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC
I
.
I
&, ,
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
134
46
46
80
45
46
46
46
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
36
of
41
Don't Know When
24
$
$
Q &, , "!
I
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
135
47
47
81
46
47
47
47
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
37
of
41
Page 35 of 41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
136
48
48
82
47
48
48
48
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
38
of
41
Page 36 of 41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
06/10/2007
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
137
49
49
83
48
49
49
49
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
39
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
138
50
50
84
49
50
50
50
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
40
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Advanced
Stan
Letter
CATERBONE
Stan
J.to
Caterbone
J.Dr.
Medi
Media
Caterbone
A.v.Group
Mastropietro
Lancaster
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
Press
Press
Executive
City
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Police
Summary
Dept.
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
139
51
51
85
50
51
51
51
of
of
of
of
51
51
of
50
51
189
85
51
51
Page
41
of
41
Tuesday,
Thursday
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
December
March
December
15,
March
June
2016
15,
3/15/2016
2016
11,
17,
15,
22,
29, 2015
2015
2016
Saturday,
October
10,
Published by Stan J. CaterboneWhat

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
August 24, 2016
The Surreptitious Reincarnation

of COINTELPRO with the COPS
Gang-Stalking Program
Lancaster City Police Strategic Plan v. Stan J. Caterbone
August 22, 2016

Written by Rahul D. Manchanda, Esq.
1. As was stated above, organized stalking methods were used extensively by communist
East Germanys Stasi (state police) as a means of maintaining political control over its
citizens. Although this is supposedly illegal in the US, the same covert tactics are quietly
used by Americas local and federal law enforcement, and intelligence agencies, to
suppress political and domestic dissent, silence whistle blowers, and get revenge
against persons who have angered someone with connections to the public and private
agencies involved.
2. Such stalking is sanctioned (and in some cases, orchestrated) by federal agencies;
however such stalking is also sometimes used unofficially for personal and corporate
vendettas by current and former corrupt employees of law enforcement and
intelligence agencies, private investigators, and their clients.
3. Common implementations of community policing include: (1) relying on community
based crime prevention by utilizing civilian education, neighborhood watch, and a variety
of other techniques, as opposed to relying solely on police patrols; (2) restructuring the
patrol from an emergency response based system to emphasizing proactive techniques
such as foot patrol; (3) increased officer accountability to civilians they are supposed to
serve; and (4) decentralizing police authority, allowing more discretion amongst
lower ranking officers, and more initiative expected from them.
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page
140
1 of
of11
189
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
I am a Federal Whistleblowwer and in 1987 I met with Executives of an International Arms

dealer named International Signal and Control, PLC., or ISC, headquartered in my hometown of
Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I at the time was a shareholder and I was solicited to finance some
problematic operations through financial firm that I had founded, Financial Management Group,
Ltd., In 1991 they were indicted for the third largest fraud in the United States, a $Billion Dollar
Fraud, when they merged with Great Britain's largest Defense Contractor, Ferranti International,
Plc., in 1987. In 1987 I was arrested for literally stealing my own files from my own office and
faced 4 felonies and 3 misdemeanors with prison terms in the tens of years. After the merger was
completed in December of 1987, all of my charges were dismissed by the Lancaster County
District Attorney's Office in March of 1988. ISC Board Member, Bobby Ray Inman, who was
former Secretary of the Navy and former Director of the National Security Agency, or NSA was
nominated to be Secretary of Defense for Bill Clinton. He later had to withdraw his name after
allegations of ISC began to surface. In 1991 Ted Koppel and the Financial Times of London
broadcast 3 different segments disclosing that ISC was essentially a black ops program of the NSA
and CIA and tried desperately to derail the nomination for Director of the CIA, Robert Gates, who
they allege was involved in the early stages of the program. He was named Director of the CIA
and later served as Secretary of Defense for George W. Bush and now President Barrack Obama.
ISC responsible for developing the Cluster Bomb, and Saddam Hussein was a loyal customer.
In the late 1980's and early 1990 I was a contractor for several government agencies, including
DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency of the Department of Defense. My
company Advanced Media Group had conducted business all over the world, including some 15 or
more foreign countries. DARPA IS WIDELY KNOWN AS A DEVELOPER OF MIND CONTROL
TECHNOLOGIES AND HOLDS PATENTS. DARPA is also credited for developing the internet. I was
an expert in optical publishing and my company was one of only 4 or 5 that had the capability to
manufacture CD-ROM's in the domestic United States.
Now, I am a prisoner of the state and have been since 1987, and that the activities surrounding
the my life has escalated into a daily occurrence of assaults. I have been a victim of organized
stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. I had also
been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault
of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy
devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted
victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the
federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv2288.
This past March I was detained by some 8 NSA Security Police, handcuffed, and interrogated for
about 2 hours at NSA Headquarters in Ft. Meade, Maryland. In 2005 I was detained by 2 DIA, or
Defense Intelligence Agency of the Department of Defense, in Austin Texas and interrogated for
almost 2 hours. Both incidents I was sent on my way without any explanation as to WHY?
Unfortunately while I have made many in person complaints to just about every law
enforcement agency, including several meeting with FBI in Philadelphia and Harrisburg,
the pleas for help and assistance have yielded nothing but more attacks to my person,
property, electronics, home, auto, reputation, intellectual property, and lastly his
mental state-of-mind A BRUTAL ARRAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE. I have alrady
has already made claims of COINTELPRO-like tactics in his filings in the U.S.C.A. Case
No. 16-4014 against these same said actors and perpetrators. Now just today I filed in
U.S. District Court in the MIDDLE DISTRICT of Pennsylvania a new HABEUS CORPUS
PETITION in hopes of gaining my freedom.
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page
141
2 of
of11
189
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS - A Petition for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit
of Happiness
It can be viewed at the following link:
https://www.scribd.com/document/321984279/Recorded-Case-No-16-Cv-1751-USDistrict-Court-Petitioner-Stanley-J-Caterbone-Writ-of-Habeus-Corpus-to-US-DistrictCourt-for-the-MIDDLE-DISTRICT-of-P
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen
Kane
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page
142
3 of
of11
189
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
The Surreptitious
Reincarnation of COINTELPRO
with the COPS Gang-Stalking
Program
August 22, 2016
Written by Rahul D. Manchanda, Esq.
In 1975 Senator Frank Church convened a joint senatorial/congressional inquiry into the egregious
human rights and civil liberties violations of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National
Security Agency (NSA), as well as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) against people
both foreign and domestic. Such blatant transgressions included the neutralization and
elimination of political dissidents, enemies of the state, real or imagined threats to National
Security, and anyone else on the proverbial shit list of the Military Industrial Complex (MIC).
The Church Committee was the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental
Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator
Frank Church (D ID) in 1975. A precursor to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence,
the committee investigated intelligence gathering for illegality by the aforementioned agencies
after certain activities had been revealed by the Watergate affair.
Some famous examples which have since emerged include: (1) the FBI sending letters to Martin
Luther King Jr encouraging him to kill himself or else they would tell the world about his sexual
proclivities; (2) the planned or successful assassinations of foreign leaders such as Fidel Castro,
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page
143
4 of
of11
189
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
Patrice Lumumba, and countless other South American, Middle Eastern or Asian leaders; (3) the
wholesale undermining of entire foreign economies if they democratically elected someone at odds
with the elite power structure deep state of the United States such as what occurred against
Salvatore Allende of Guatemala; (4) the possible assassination of John F Kennedy; (5) revelations
of Christopher Pyle in January 1970 of the U.S. Army's spying on the civilian population; (6) the
December 22, 1974 New York Times article by Seymour Hersh detailing operations engaged in by
the CIA over the years that had been dubbed the "family jewels, involving covert action programs
involving assassination attempts against foreign leaders and covert attempts to subvert foreign
governments were reported for the first time; (7) efforts by intelligence agencies to collect
information on the political activities of US citizens; and (8) countless other examples, both
overseas and domestically.
The end result of the Church Committee Hearings was the outright banning on CIA assassinations
as well as the FBI/DOJ COINTELPRO gang-stalking programs. In 1975 and 1976, the Church
Committee published fourteen reports on various U.S. intelligence agencies' formation, operations,
and the alleged abuses of law and of power that they had committed, with recommendations for
reform, some of which were later put in place.
Among the other matters investigated were attempts to assassinate other foreign leaders such as
Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic, the Diem brothers of Vietnam, Gen. Ren Schneider of
Chile, and Director of CIA Allen Dulles's plan (approved by President Dwight Eisenhower) to use
the Sicilian Mafia to kill Fidel Castro of Cuba.
Under recommendations and pressure by this committee, President Gerald Ford issued Executive
Order 11905 (ultimately replaced in 1981 by President Reagan's Executive Order 12333) to ban
U.S. sanctioned assassinations of foreign leaders.
Together, the Church Committee's reports have been said to constitute the most extensive review
of intelligence activities ever made available to the public. Much of the contents were classified,
but over 50,000 pages were declassified under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination
Records Collection Act of 1992.
The Church Committee learned that beginning in the 1950s, the CIA and FBI intercepted, opened,
and photographed more than 215,000 pieces of mail by the time the program was shut down. The
Church report found that the CIA was zealous about keeping the US Postal Service from learning
that mail was being opened by government agents. CIA agents moved mail to a private room to
open the mail or in some cases opened envelopes at night after stuffing them in briefcases or coat
pockets to deceive postal officials.
On May 9, 1975, the Church Committee called CIA director William Colby. That same day Ford's
top advisers (Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Philip W. Buchen, and John Marsh) drafted a
recommendation that Colby be authorized to brief only rather than testify, and that he would be
told to discuss only the general subject, with details of specific covert actions to be avoided except
for realistic hypotheticals. But the Church Committee had full authority to call a hearing and
require Colby's testimony. Ford and his top advisers met with Colby to prepare him for the
hearing.
The Ford administration, particularly Rumsfeld, was concerned about the effort by members of
the Church Committee in the Senate and the Pike Committee in the House to curtail the power of
U.S. intelligence agencies. It seemed that Rumsfeld et al was comfortable giving the power to
arbitrarily destroy anyone as enemies of the state by anyone working in the IC and MIC.
COINTELPRO (COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of covert and illegal projects
conducted by the FBI aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic
political dissidents.
FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI
deemed subversive, including anti Vietnam War organizers, activists of the Civil Rights Movement
or Black Power movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther Party), feminist
organizations, anti colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican independence groups like the Young
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page
144
5 of
of11
189
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
Lords), and a variety of organizations that were part of the broader New Left.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives on COINTELPRO, ordering FBI agents to "expose,
disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or otherwise eliminate" the activities of these movements
and especially their leaders. Under Hoover, the agent in charge of COINTELPRO was William C.
Sullivan.
Tactics included anonymous phone calls, IRS audits, and the creation of documents that would
divide their targets internally.
After the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Hoover singled out King as a major
target for COINTELPRO. Under pressure from Hoover to focus on King, Sullivan wrote: In the
light of King's powerful demagogic speech, we must mark him now, if we have not done so before,
as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation from the standpoint of communism, the
Negro, and national security.
The Final Report of the Select Frank Church Committee blasted the behavior of the intelligence
community in its domestic operations (including COINTELPRO) in no uncertain terms:
The Committee finds that the domestic activities of the intelligence community at times violated
specific statutory prohibitions and infringed the constitutional rights of American citizens. The legal
questions involved in intelligence programs were often not considered. On other occasions, they
were intentionally disregarded in the belief that because the programs served the "national
security" the law did not apply. While intelligence officers on occasion failed to disclose to their
superiors programs which were illegal or of questionable legality, the Committee finds that the
most serious breaches of duty were those of senior officials, who were responsible for controlling
intelligence activities and generally failed to assure compliance with the law. Many of the
techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society even if all of the targets had been
involved in violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that - the Bureau conducted a
sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First Amendment
rights of speech and association, on the theory that preventing the growth of dangerous groups
and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.
According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used four main methods
during COINTELPRO:
(1) Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose
was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential
supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents;
(2) Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad "dirty tricks" to undermine progressive
movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and other publications
in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made
anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation about meetings and events, set up
pseudo movement groups run by government agents, and manipulated or strong armed parents,
employers, landlords, school officials and others to cause trouble for activists. They used bad
jacketing to create suspicion about targeted activists, sometimes with lethal consequences;
(3) Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass
dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and
presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They
discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations and used conspicuous
surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate
activists and silence their supporters;
(4) Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten dissidents; to
conduct illegal break ins in order to search dissident homes; and to commit vandalism, assaults,
beatings and assassinations. The object was to frighten or eliminate dissidents and disrupt their
movements.
The FBI specifically developed tactics intended to heighten tension and hostility between various
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page
145
6 of
of11
189
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
factions in their targeted groups and individuals, and this resulted in numerous deaths, among
which were San Diego Black Panther Party members John Huggins, Bunchy Carter and Sylvester
Bell.
While COINTELPRO was officially terminated in April 1971, critics allege that continuing FBI
actions indicate that post COINTELPRO reforms did not succeed in ending COINTELPRO tactics.
ENTER THE COPS FEDERAL AND STATE SANCTIONED GANG-STALKING PROGRAM
Community Oriented Policing, (COPS) is a strategy of policing that focuses on police building
ties and working closely with members of the communities, and originated in 1994 when then
Senator Joseph Biden wrote and then President Bill Clinton enacted the Violent Crime Control and
Law Enforcement Act (VCCLEA) establishing the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services
(COPS) within the US Department of Justice.
Community policing is supposedly a policy that requires police to engage in a proactive approach
to address public safety concerns, and is a cornerstone of the Clinton Administration, gaining its
funding from the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act.
Common implementations of community policing include: (1) relying on community based crime
prevention by utilizing civilian education, neighborhood watch, and a variety of other techniques,
as opposed to relying solely on police patrols; (2) restructuring the patrol from an emergency
response based system to emphasizing proactive techniques such as foot patrol; (3) increased
officer accountability to civilians they are supposed to serve; and (4) decentralizing police
authority, allowing more discretion amongst lower ranking officers, and more initiative expected
from them.
In other words, federal and state sanctioned and approved GANG-STALKING.
Gang Stalking has been described as fascism, using East Germany style Stasi Tactics, a systemic
form of control, which seeks to control every aspect of a Targeted Individuals life. Gang Stalking
has many similarities to workplace mobbing, but takes place outside in the community, where the
target is followed around and placed under surveillance by groups of organized civilian
spies/snitches 24/7, 365 days a year. Targeted Individuals are harassed in this way for months or
years before they realize that they are being targeted by an organized program of gang-stalking
harassment. This is very similar to what happened to many innocent individuals in the former East
Germany or activists and dissidents in the former Soviet Union. Many innocent people in the
former East Germany would be targeted for these harassment programs, and then their friends,
family, and the community at large would be used to monitor, prosecute, and harass them. In the
former USSR it was used by the state to target activists, political dissidents, or anyone that the
Secret Police thought was an enemy of the state, or as mentally unfit, and many were
institutionalized or murdered using this form of systematic control.
In Bill Clintons COPS Gang-Stalking Program, civilian spies are recruited from every segment of
society, and everyone in the targets life is made a part of this ongoing, continuous, and
systematic form of control and harassment, with such actions that are specifically designed to
control the target and to keep them in line, like a Pavlovian Dog. These actions are also designed
to mentally, physically, emotionally, spiritually, financially, socially, and psychologically destroy the
target over years, to make them appear to be crazy, and leave them with no form of support,
whatsoever.
For the targets of this harassment, COPS Gang Stalking is experienced as a covert psychological,
emotional and physical attack that is capable of immobilizing and destroying a target over time.
For the state, it is a way to keep their targets in line, control them, or ultimately destroy them.
This modern day systematic form of control is funded at the highest levels of government, just
like it has in other societies where these similar types of harassment programs have been
implemented.
Targets can be chosen for many reasons: (1) political views; (2) whistle blowing; (3) political
dissidence; (4) asserting rights at work; (5) making the wrong enemy; (6) too outspoken; (7)
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page
146
7 of
of11
189
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
investigating something that the state does not want investigated; (8) signing a petition; (9)
writing a letter; (10) being suspicious by a civilian spy/snitch; or (11) being a
religious/ethnic/racial minority.
The goal of the COPS state sanctioned organized gang-stalking program is to isolate the target
from all forms of support, so that the target can be set up in the future for arrest,
institutionalized, or forced suicide. Other goals of this harassment are to destroy the targets
reputation and credibility, and to make the target look crazy or unstable.
The process often involves sensitizing the target to every day stimulis as a form of control, which
is used to control targets when they get out of line. Targets of this harassment become
vulnerable and destitute, and often become homeless, jobless, have a breakdown, are driven to
suicide, similar to targets of the banned COINTELPRO. The government eliminates perceived
enemies of the state in this manner.
When a target moves or changes jobs, the harassment continues.
Every time the target moves, the same defamation, lies, libel, and slander will be spread, and the
systematic harassment will continue. Online defamation, libel, and slander on the internet has
made this continuation of COPS gang-stalking a great deal easier.
People from all segments of society can be recruited to be the eyes and ears of the state, such
as laborers, drug dealers, drug users, street people, prostitutes, punks, church groups, youth
groups, your best friend, your lawyer, local policeman, doctor, emergency services, a neighbor,
family, social workers, politicians, judges, dentists, vet, supermarket cashier, postman, religious
leader, care worker, landlord, anyone.
Most of these recruited civilian spies/snitches do not understand or even care that the end
consequence of this harassment protocol is to eventually destroy the targeted person, and
function as useful idiots of the state sanctioned COPS gang-stalking program.
It has been reported that people participate in this COPS gang stalking because it: (1) gives them
a sense of power; (2) is a way to make friends; (3) is something social and fun; (4) breaks down
race/gender/age/social barriers; (5) is forced or blackmailed upon them by the State or police to
take part; (6) is told to them that they are part of homeland or national security to help keep an
eye on dangerous or emotionally disturbed individuals where they are heroic spies for the
state; (7) is used on local thugs or informants who are already being used for other activities
where their energies are diverted into these COPS gangstalking community spy programs; (8) is
either a choice of spying for the State or police, or else go to jail; (9) involves outright lies and
slander about the target to get them to go along with ruining the targets life; (10) includes
average citizens recruited by the state the same way citizens were recruited in the former East
Germany and other countries.
Some techniques used against targets in this organized COPS Gang-stalking program include: (1)
classic conditioning where a target is sensitized to everyday stimuli over a period of months and
years to harass them in public to let them know they are constantly being harassed and
monitored; (2) 24/7 Surveillance following the target everywhere they go, learning about the
target and where they shop, work, play, who their friends and family are, getting close to the
target, moving into the community or apartment where they live, across the street, monitoring
the targets phone, house, and computer activity; (3) isolating the target via defamation, libel, and
slander campaigns, (eg, people in the targets community are told that the target is a thief, into
drugs, a prostitute, pedophile, crazy, in trouble for something, needs to be watched, false files will
even be produced on the target, shown to neighbors, family, store keepers); (4) constant or
intermittent noise and mimicking campaigns disrupting the targets life and sleep with loud power
tools, construction, stereos, doors slamming, etc; (5) talking in public about private things in the
targets life; (6) mimicking actions of the target and basically letting the target know that they are
in the targets life; (7) daily interferences, not too overt to the untrained eye, but psychologically
degrading and damaging to the target over time; (8) everyday life breaks and street theater such
as flat tires, sleep deprivation, drugging food, putting dirt on targets property; (9) mass strangers
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page
147
8 of
of11
189
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
doing things in public to annoy targets such as getting called/text messages to be at a specific
time and place to perform a specific action; (10) blocking targets path, getting ahead of them in
line, cutting or boxing them in on the road, saying or doing things to elicit a response from the
target; (11) baiting tactics where a surveillance operation can selectively capture evidence of a
targeted person responding to harassment, and then that evidence could then be used to justify
the initiation of more formal scrutiny by a government agency.
The COPS Gang-Stalking Program, as all other state sanctioned/approved gang-stalking programs,
have always been funded by the Government. They are the only ones with enough money,
coordination, and power to keep such a system in place. These coordinated efforts then join hands
with others for this systemic form of control and harassment.
Such operations have nothing to do with the targets criminality - they are led and perpetrated by
federal agents and intelligence/security contractors, often with the support of state and local law
enforcement personnel. Unofficial operations of this type are often private investigators and
vigilantes including many former agents and police officers, sometimes on behalf of corporate
clients and others with connections to the public and private elements of Americas security
industry.
The goal of such operations is disruption of the life of an individual deemed to be an enemy (or
potential enemy) of clients or members of the security state. Arguably, the most accurate term for
this form of harassment would be counterintelligence stalking.
Agents of communist East Germanys Stasi (state police) referred to this process as Zersetzung
(German for decomposition or corrosion a reference to the severe psychological, social, and
financial effects upon the victim). Victims have described the process as no touch torture a
phrase which also captures the nature of the crime: cowardly, unethical (and often illegal), but
difficult to prove legally, because it generates minimal forensic evidence.
Tactics include online and personal slander, libel, defamation, blacklisting, mobbing (intense,
organized harassment in public), black bag jobs (residential break ins), abusive phone calls,
computer hacking, framing, threats, blackmail, vandalism, street theater (staged physical and
verbal interactions with the minions of the people who orchestrate the stalking), harassment by
noises, and other forms of bullying.
Such stalking is sanctioned (and in some cases, orchestrated) by federal agencies; however such
stalking is also sometimes used unofficially for personal and corporate vendettas by current and
former corrupt employees of law enforcement and intelligence agencies, private investigators, and
their clients.
Since counterintelligence stalking goes far beyond surveillance into the realm of psychological
terrorism, as it is essentially a form of extrajudicial punishment. As such, the harassment is illegal
even when done by the government. It clearly violates the US Constitutions Fourth
Amendment, which prohibits unwarranted searches, and the Sixth Amendment which guarantees
the right to a trial. Such operations also violate similar fundamental rights defined by state
constitutions. Stalking is also specifically prohibited by the criminal codes of every state in
America.
As was stated above, organized stalking methods were used extensively by communist East
Germanys Stasi (state police) as a means of maintaining political control over its citizens.
Although this is supposedly illegal in the US, the same covert tactics are quietly used by Americas
local and federal law enforcement, and intelligence agencies, to suppress political and domestic
dissent, silence whistle blowers, and get revenge against persons who have angered someone
with connections to the public and private agencies involved.
Although Edward Snowdens revelations about the National Security Agency (NSA) in 2013 and
2014 generated a great deal of public discussion about mass surveillance, US domestic
counterintelligence activities such as the COPS Program receive relatively little attention.
The FBIs COINTELPRO operation is still happening, involving even more advanced surveillance
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page
148
9 of
of11
189
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
technology - and this program is none other than Joseph Biden and Bill Clintons COPS Program.
US Department of Justice crime statistics from a 2006 survey indicated that an estimated 445,220
COPS gangstalking victims reported three or more perpetrators (the only ones reported), and this
number is growing exponentially on a daily basis.
In addition to being morally reprehensible, the COPS gang stalking program, just like the original
version of the FBIs COINTELPRO operations, is very, very illegal. It violates criminal laws in all
fifty states against stalking, as well as grossly violates the US Constitutions prohibitions against
warrantless searches and extra judicial punishment.
While the vast majority of Americans are never personally targeted by the Joseph Biden/Bill
Clinton COPS gangstalking program, they should still be concerned about the existence of such
operations.
Even if such activities were constitutionally legitimate (which they are not), they still have an
enormous potential for abuse as a personal or political weapon by enemies currently employed or
friendly with these governmental institutions.
Ending this cowardly and illegal practice by law enforcement agencies, intelligence agencies, and
their parasitic corporate and individual recruits will first require exposing what is happening, to the
public.
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page149
10 of 189
11
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016

and Advanced
Gives Them
Media
The Right?
Group
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
The Surreptitious
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
Reincarnation
City Police
of COINTELPRO
Dept.
Page
Page150
11 of 189
11
Thursday
Wednesday
December
August 29,
24, 2016
Negotioations with the Lancaster County Administrator, Mark Esterbrook, and the Lancaster Mediation Center
Subject: Lancaster County & Mediation

From: Stan Caterbone (amgroup01@msn.com)
Sent: Thu 1/03/08 1:23 PM
To:
Esterbrook, Mark (mesterbrook@co.lancaster.pa.us)
Cc:
info@lancmed.org
FBI, Field Office (philadelphia@fbi.gov); Owens, Bill
Bcc: (houston01@juno.com); Owings, Lisa (lisa_owings@judiciaryrep.senate.gov)
Mark,
You do understand that I am very interested in having all of the misconduct and illicit
behavior at the beset of Lancaster County Employees mediated?
I hope that you take the time to defend some of those activities in preparation for
mediation.
Trust me, wrongs will be righted. Did you read the quote today from your future
District Attorney? It was quite timely and on the money.
I should trust that I am not the exception to the rule, at least anymore.
Do you understand me?
"I don't think anybody's going to tell you that I'm lenient on crime," said Stedman in
an office he's decorated with pictures of 19th-century battle scenes. "You hear talk
Well, there's an even

greater right, and that's the right of life,
liberty and to live crime-free."
about criminal rights all the time.
Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney Elect

January 3, 2008
Lancaster Intelligencer Journal
Intelligencer Journal
January 3, 2008
New DA offers more than one column can say
Even-handed outlook Fighting smart
Attorney Robert Beyer at trial belabored a point about a
missing .22-caliber slug.
He sought to persuade jurors that just because police failed to find a spent bullet
didn't mean his client lied about shooting someone after being shot at first.
Beyer raised the possibility that police didn't use a fine enough screen when sifting
soil for the bullet. He successfully established, he thought, that the slug could have
fallen through.

Page 151 of 189

Page 1 of 20

January 4, 2008
"I went home that night with the wind in my sails," Beyer recalled.
The next morning, he was crestfallen. Prosecutor Craig Stedman overnight had
contacted the state trooper who did the sifting. The trooper arrived from Pittsburgh
and showed jurors the screen. There was no way a slug would slip through.
Beyer could only shake his head.
Beyer recalled the courtroom setback when I asked him about Stedman, a 43-yearold Bucks County native who will be sworn in Friday as Lancaster County's new
district attorney.
"He's so thorough," Beyer said, "it's unbelievable."
Detective Lt. Kent Switzer of the city's violent crime unit has a similar opinion,
having worked at Stedman's side on countless cases. Citing his work ethic, legal
knowledge and investigative insights, Switzer said, "Without a doubt Craig is the
most tenacious and hard-working prosecutor I've had the privilege of working with."
Stedman ran unopposed in the GOP primary and general election, having secured
the backing of fellow assistant district attorneys and two police organizations.
In 16 years in the DA's office, Stedman gained a reputation as a hard-nosed
prosecutor of high-profile defendants such as Landon May, now on death row for the
torture and murder of an Ephrata couple.
"I don't think anybody's going to tell you that I'm lenient on
crime," said Stedman in an office he's decorated with pictures
of 19th-century battle scenes. "You hear talk about criminal
rights all the time. Well, there's an even greater right, and
that's the right of life, liberty and to live crime-free."
But Stedman also made clear he's not a one-dimensional prosecutor fixated on
locking up people and throwing away the key.
"There are some evil people who are going to commit crimes no matter what ... and
we'll deal with them," Stedman said. "But the prosecutor's job is not to win the
maximum verdict and maximum sentence in every single case. It's about doing the
right thing for the right reasons."
The goal, as Stedman sees it, is a safer community. Jailing the incorrigible is one
tool, but just as important are education and crime-prevention strategies.
"I don't want to be just reactive," Stedman said. "I want to be proactive."
Stedman sees his office working with groups such as the Lancaster Community
Safety Coalition and James Street Improvement District, which are trying to create a
safe environment conducive to economic development.

Page 152 of 189

Page 2 of 20

January 4, 2008
district
attorney
talking
about
economic
development?
"It shows how smart he really is," said Beyer, a former prosecutor who mentored
Stedman 16 years ago. "You don't often get a DA with his sense of jurisprudence."
Stedman is respected as a crime fighter. As DA he sees himself also becoming a
problem solver.
"What we have to do is fight smart," he said, and that's why he's open to new ideas - from starting a mental-health court to targeting nuisance rental units.
"There's no magic bullet," Stedman said, "but the long-term solution is certainly not
'locking 'em all up.' The long-term solution is getting people to buy into the
community and choosing not to offend."
One column can't do justice to all Stedman has to say. Look for more on Friday.
Stan J. Caterbone
Visit Our Blog For Journey of a Whistleblower
Visit Our Blog For Research Into ESP - Mental Telepathy & The U.S. Governments
ctivities
Visit Our Video Biography
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly discredited since
1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster,
Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our
reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption.
We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We
continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of
justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. Number 7.
Subject: RE: Visit and Mediation Agreement

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:52:12 -0500
From: MEsterbrook@co.lancaster.pa.us
To: info@lancmed.org; amgroup01@msn.com
Stan,
I trust your holiday was a good one! Sorry it took so long to get
back to you, but most folks here were on vacation the past two
weeks. Mr. Grays email response is timely and appropriate given my
discussions with internal counsel. I will refrain from any legal advice,
as that would be highly improper. However, I believe Mr. Grays offer
below is your best venue. The Lancaster Mediation Center performs

Page 153 of 189

Page 3 of 20

January 4, 2008
services directly related to your specific mediation request to myself in

December. Unfortunately, I am unable to provide those services to
you and was unable to find another avenue for you to pursue from my
office. I wish you well in your mediation efforts. It was pleasant
meeting with you!
Best Regards,
Mark
Mark Esterbrook
County Administrator
Lancaster County Commissioners
50 North Duke Street
PO Box 83480
Lancaster, PA 17608-3480
717/299-8300
717/293-7208 (fax)
From: Lancaster Mediation Center [mailto:info@lancmed.org]

Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 4:28 PM
To: Stan Caterbone
Cc: Esterbrook, Mark
Subject: Re: Visit and Mediation Agreement
Dear Mr. Caterbone,
It was unclear why you sent us a copy of your correspondence with
Mr. Esterbrook with the above subject along with a copy of the
Lancaster Bar Association Mediation Agreement for its ADR Program.
We do conduct mediations. I would be pleased to talk with you about
our service if you would like. Please let me know if that is what you
want.
In peace,
Grayfred B. Gray
Lancaster Mediation Center, 225 W. King Street, Lancaster, PA 17603,
Phone 717-293-7231, Fax. 717-390-7783, info@lancmed.org ,
www.lancmed.org
Lancaster Mediation Center (LMC) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit
organization. Contributions are tax deductible as provided by law. A
copy of the official registration and financial information of LMC may
be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling toll
free, within Pennsylvania, 1-800-732-0999. Registration does not
imply endorsement.

Page 154 of 189

Page 4 of 20

January 4, 2008

Page 155 of 189

Page 5 of 20

January 4, 2008
January 4, 2008
Dear Mr. Caterbone:

I have not read the detailed materials that you sent the Center before today because we aim to protect your
privacy. We do not need to know about the details of the dispute for you to decide whether we can help you.
That is the first decision we need from a potential client. If you need to meet with me to talk about whether to
mediate, I can arrange that. I hope this letter will give you the information you need to make that decision on an
informed basis, but please call if you need any further information.
We mediate all kinds of disputes, including disputes between private citizens and government. Mediation
does not involve an investigation and is the opposite of a trial or arbitration because the people involved decide
the solution. Mediation does not result in findings or judgments. Consequently if you meet with me, you will
not need to bring papers about what has happened. Here is how we work in mediation.
Mediation is under the protection of a Pennsylvania statute, which provides that the mediators and staff
cannot testify as to what was said in their mediation work and documents prepared for and used in the
mediation cannot be subpoenaed. That creates a confidential setting in which the clients can speak freely, and
the mediators and staff will have no further involvement in the dispute if it is not resolved in mediation. There
are narrow exceptions to the statute, which you can read at 42 Pa. C.S. (Consolidated Statutes) 5949.
We provide a team of two professionally trained mediators to work jointly at all times on each dispute. Each
of them will be cleared for conflict of interest before being assigned to the dispute. Occasionally we will have a
third mediator observe the session and, if called for, help the mediators who are co-mediating.
The mediators job is to be neutral and impartial at all times and to serve their clients, who are all the people
involved in the dispute. Mediators help their clients figure out what is best for themselves in dealing with the
dispute. What the clients decide does not have to satisfy the mediators.
Mediators help each client think clearly and effectively about their needs in the dispute and then
communicate clearly to the others in the dispute. Mediators do not judge their clients or their clients' disputes.
The mediators do not give any kind of advice, including legal advice.
Clients may have lawyers with them in mediation if all clients agree. The job of the lawyer in mediation at the
Center is not what you see in a trial on TV. The lawyer is present to advise or provide information to the client.
The lawyer may speak in the mediation but usually only the clients talk because they are the ones who are to
decide what to do. Lawyers in mediation do not interrogate people.
The client's role in mediation is to share information and to figure out what is best for themselves. Mediation is
accomplished by working through several stages.
First the co-mediator team meets with all the clients and learns first hand from them what the dispute is
about.
Second the mediators help the clients decide what problems need to be resolved for the dispute to be over.
Third the clients, with the help of the mediators, identify a number of possible ways to solve each of the
problems.
Fourth the mediators guide the clients in a careful evaluation of each of the options for solution. As they
work through the options, sometimes new problems and options emerge that are then worked on. Usually
during this stage an agreement develops that they are satisfied resolves the dispute.
Page 156 of 189

Page 6 of 20

January 4, 2008
Fifth the agreement is written unless the clients agree that they do not want it written. The agreement is
carried out and the dispute is over.
While most of the time the mediation sessions include all clients, there is the possibility of clients meeting
separately with the mediators in a private session. Anyone can ask for such a session during the process.
That is how the mediation process works at the Center. When the clients work with the support of the
mediators, over 80% of the time the clients resolve the dispute to their own satisfaction.
Mediation is voluntary. Agreeing to mediate does not obligate you to reach an agreement that resolves the
dispute. If you decide that you want to mediate, the next question will be whether others in the dispute agree to
mediate.
If you decide that mediation is something that could be helpful to you, your next decision will be where you
want to get mediators. You are aware of the Lancaster Bar Association ADR Program, which includes
mediators who are available for you. There are other private practice mediators, who are not lawyers.
Of course, the Mediation Center is a possible source of mediators for you. It is my responsibility to tell
you that the Mediation Center had a grant from Lancaster County in 2007, and the Center will apply to the new
County Commissioners for a grant this year. The grant does not affect the work of our mediators, but it is your
decision whether that fact calls for you to get mediators elsewhere. The Center's offices are also provided by
the County through the courts, which sometimes refer cases to mediate as do law enforcement officers. The
Center is a non-profit organization and gets its funds from fees for mediation, fees for training mediators,
private contributions, fund raising events, and grants from foundations and government.
Please call or write if you want to mediate through the Center or have questions. Thank you for considering
mediation for disputes and for considering mediation through the Center.
Peace
Linda Strauss
Administrative Assistant

Page 157 of 189

Page 7 of 20

January 4, 2008
WELCOME Negotioations
TO THE with the Lancaster County Administrator, Mark Esterbrook, and the Lancaster Mediation Center
LANCASTER MEDIATION CENTER
Since 1981 the Lancaster Mediation Center has
served all of Lancaster County. It is located in
downtown Lancaster with free parking beside its
offices.
Mediation at the Center is a process in which
impartial mediators help people in a dispute
think better about their own needs and communicate
clearly with others in the dispute. The mediators'
goal is to help each person in the dispute make their
own decisions about what to do and how they
might resolve it.
People come to the Center for help because they
have an important dispute and have
not been able to resolve it
themselves. Center mediators
respect the importance of their
clients' decisions and work hard to
provide a good place for each person
in the dispute to work out their own
future.
The Lancaster Mediation Center celebrated the first

Lancaster County Peacemaker Celebration in March of
2007. The celebration commemorated the Center's 25
years of service to the community. Twenty-five
honorees were chosen as Lancaster County
Peacemakers from all walks of life and all ages. Pictured
here is one of our Peacemaker recipients, Frank
Albrecht of Lancaster City
Schools.
View all of our
honorees...
Volunteer Mediators Needed
The Lancaster Mediation Center has an immediate
need for volunteer mediators, especially men for
divorce mediation. Divorce mediators work in
pairs to help clients through the hardships of a
divorce or separation.
News
The break-up of a marriage or other intimate
relationship is an incomparably painful
experience. In the midst of this emotional crisis,
women and men are required to make decisions
that may affect them for a lifetime. The Lancaster
Mediation Center's goal is to help separating or
divorcing partners address the difficult legal,
economic, and parenting issues without
destroying themselves, each other, or their
children.
Mediators are asked to commit to a particular
time and day of the week to mediate. Write to
info@lancmed.org or call 293-7231.
Grayfred Gray, Executive Director of the Lancaster

Mediation Center, was recognized by the Tennessee
Coalition for Mediation Awareness on Thursday, Oct.
18, 2007, Dispute Resolution Day, at Lipscomb
University. Grayfred is Professor Emeritus at the
University of Tennessee College of Law.
He was presented with the first "Grayfred Gray Public
Service Mediation Award" which was given in
recognition of his work promoting the use of

mediation in Tennessee from 1987 until he moved to
Lancaster in 2003. View pictures and additional
information from the event...
What problems can be mediated?

landlord/tenant disagreements
parent/child and sibling problems
harassment and interpersonal conflicts
neighbor or roommate conflicts
business and consumer disputes
civil and "small claims" cases
and more...
More than 80 percent of the cases that come to mediation
are resolved by agreement between the people who
previously had not been able to settle the dispute. Mediators
help them come up with workable solutions.
Call us at (717) 293-7231 to discuss your particular needs. All

and all mediations

are confidential.
Page 158 of contacts
189
Thursday
December 29, 2016
Page 8 of 20
January 4, 2008
First Lancaster County Peacemaker Celebration

HONOREES
click on pictures to view larger image
Frank Albrecht
Lancaster City Schools.
Loraine Stutzman Amstutz

Victim-offender mediation
Charles Bonner
Marine veteran peacemaker
Gioacchino Jack Brignola

Children and Youth Agency
Page 159 of 189

Page 9 of 20

January 4, 2008
Robert Brock
Doug Burkholder
Hole in the Wall Theatre, Inc.,

Artistic Director
Philhaven
Lisa Conner
Grace Byler
Retired Executive Director,
Lancaster Mediation Center
Counselor at Donegal Middle

School
Michael Goldberg, Esq.

Carl Driedger
Page 160 of 189

Page 10 of 20

January 4, 2008

Mid-Penn Legal Services
Lancaster County Domestic

Violence Supervisor, AP&PS
Patricia Hopson-Shelton
Beverly Groff
Millersville University
Teacher at Pequea Valley High
School.
Michael Landis
Dr. Donald Kraybill
Chief County Detective, District

Attorneys Office
Elizabethtown College

Page 161 of 189

Page 11 of 20

January 4, 2008
Celso A. Mesias What Gives Them The Right?
John Lapp
Former Director of Mennonite

Central Committee
Manos A La Obra program
Roberto Monzon
Barbara Mitchell
Manos House.
Teacher at McCaskey High
School
Adrian Rodriguez
Lynne Radcliffe
Transition to Community.
Counselor in Hempfield School

District
Scott
CATERBONE v. Lancaster CityWayne
Police Dept.
Page 162 of 189

Page 12 of 20

January 4, 2008
Executive Director, The Mix at

Arbor Place
K.L. Shirk, Jr., Esq.

Jon Singer
Promoter of mediation
(Deceased)
Executive Director, LAVORP
Marcus Smucker
Barb Toews
Mediator in churches.
Restorative Justice practitioner
The Lancaster Mediation Center

thanks Jose Urdaneta for
photographing our honorees for
this event.
click here for the Urdaneta

Photography website
Page 163 of 189

Page 13 of 20

January 4, 2008
Urdaneta Photography
Bulova Technologies LLC
Millersville University
Graphic Communications Department of

Stevens College of Technology
Amanda Baldwin, Graphic Designer
Emerald Asset Management, Inc.
Grayfred and Lois Gray
Trout, Ebersole & Groff, LLP, CPA
Stardust Entertainment & Events
Bazella Dombrowski & Co., CPA's

Lancaster County Association of Realtors

Page 164 of 189

Page 14 of 20

January 4, 2008
LANCASTER BAR ASSOCIATION

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM
MEDIATION AGREEMENT
1.
Introduction
The undersigned parties recognize that the Lancaster Bar Association (LBA) sponsors
and administers an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Program as a public service to the
community. The goal of the program is to provide an opportunity for an expeditious resolution of
disputes which are, or could be, pending as civil actions in the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas. This includes all civil actions, except for cases involving divorce, equitable distribution,
custody, child or spousal support, alimony, alimony pendente lite, or paternity.
2.
Role of the Bar Association
The Lancaster Bar Association sponsors the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program. The
role of the Bar Association in the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program, however, is merely one
of administering the request for ADR. The undersigned parties, by voluntarily participating in the
program, accept and recognize that:
The Lancaster Bar Association, mediator, and LBA-ADR Committee shall have no
liability, expressed, implied or otherwise, with respect to any aspect of the Alternative Dispute
Resolution Program, including the actions or omissions of any mediator.
3.
Definition of Mediation
Mediation is typically a settlement discussion. Negotiations are assisted by a neutral,

impartial third party ("mediator") who promotes or facilitates an understanding among the parties of
their common interest in reconciling or settling the matter. The mediator does not make any
decision for the parties, except by special agreement. Although the mediator assigned may be a
member of the Lancaster Bar Association and a practicing attorney, no attorney/client privilege
attaches to the communication between the parties and the mediator. No attorney/client relationship
is established with the mediator. THE MEDIATOR WILL NOT BE SERVING AS AN
ATTORNEY OR ADVOCATE FOR ANY PARTY.
4.
Selection of a Mediator
a.
The parties will have twenty days from the date they submit the completed Request
For ADR to review the list of approved mediators and select a mediator acceptable to all parties. In
the event that the parties agree on the mediator, that name should be supplied immediately to the
Lancaster Bar Association.

Page 165 of 189

Page 15 of 20

January 4, 2008
b.
In the event that there is no agreement on the mediator within twenty (20) days, the
Lancaster Bar Association Executive Director or her/his designee will provide the parties with
written notice of 3 possible mediators, whose selection will be based on a rolling, random
assignment of approved mediators on the Lancaster Bar Association list. Each side may strike one
name. The remaining person, or the first one selected by the LBA if more than one remain, shall be
assigned as the mediator.
5.
Mediator Not To Be Called As Witness
The parties agree not to call the mediator or any member of the Lancaster Bar
Association Alternative Dispute Resolution Program as a witness or an expert in any pending or
subsequent litigation as to any matter related to this arbitration. The parties will defend the
mediator and any members of the Lancaster Bar Association Alternative Dispute Resolution
Program from any Subpoena from any party as to the subject of this arbitration. The mediator
is not liable to any party for any act or omission in connection with this mediation.
6.
Scheduling the ADR Conference
After the Bar Association has been notified of the selection of a mutually agreeable
mediator, or after the Bar Association has appointed a mediator in the instance where there has been
no agreement, it will then be the responsibility of the mediator to schedule the date, time and place
of the mediation conference, and to notify the parties and the Bar Association of the schedule. All
mediation conferences will be held in Lancaster County, unless there is special agreement
otherwise.
7.
Exchange of Documents
At least ten (10) days prior to the mediation conference, each party shall provide opposing
parties and the mediator with a mediation conference statement which must include the following
information:
a.
a succinct statement of position regarding liability and damages;
b.
a description of the legal issues involved, with citation of legal authority;
c.
copies of any controlling documents in dispute;
d.
copies of expert reports on which they intend to rely;
e.
an itemized list of damages; and
f.
the parties current settlement positions and rationale.
If a party fails to provide the mediation conference statement, the party who fails to
provide the required statement may be required to pay the entire mediation fee and the reasonable
2
Page 166 of 189

Page 16 of 20

January 4, 2008
attorney's fees and expenses for preparation of the mediation conference statement by those parties
who have timely filed their statements, as assessed and ordered by the mediator.
8.
Participation at Mediation Conference
a.
The decision to mediate a case is voluntary. However once a mediator has been
selected by the parties or the LBA, the attendance of parties at the mediation conference shall be
mandatory. A representative of any party's insurance company which may be involved in the case
shall be available in person or by telephone during the course of the mediation conference. If a
party fails to appear, the non-appearing party shall, within thirty (30) days from the mailing of the
mediation conference report, pay the entire mediation fee as well as the opposing party's
reasonable expenses in attending the mediation conference, as assessed and ordered by the
mediator.
b.
All parties are expected to make only truthful statements to each other and the
mediator during the mediation process. Failure to do so may be determined by a Court to be a
fraudulent act sufficient to void the terms of the Agreement and any mediation result.
9.
Confidentiality
a.
All statements made during the course of the mediation are intended by the parties
to be privileged settlement discussions made without prejudice to any party's legal position, and
non-discoverable for any purpose in any legal proceeding. Any information disclosed by any
party, or by a representative of a party, or by a witness on behalf of a party, to the mediator is
intended to be confidential. No privilege is intended to be waived by any such disclosure.
However, final determination of the matter is up to a court of competent jurisdiction.
b.
Disclosure of any records, reports or other documents received by the mediator
cannot be compelled. The mediator shall not be compelled to disclose or to testify in any
proceeding as to information disclosed or representations made in the course of the mediation
conference or communicated to the mediator in confidence.
c.
The parties agree that no party to this mediation will attempt to subpoena the
mediator for testimony, deposition or discovery related to any documents or discussions arising
during ADR. If a party breaches this Agreement and attempts to subpoena the mediator, that party
will be liable for and shall indemnify the mediator for any costs, expenses, liabilities and/or fees,
including attorneys' fees, that might be incurred by the mediator in objecting to the subpoena. The
parties agree to maintain the confidentiality of the mediation conference and shall not in any
proceeding attempt to rely on or introduce discussions regarding settlement, admissions made by
any party during the course of the mediation, or any matter relating to proposals made and/or views
expressed by the mediator.
d.
mediation.
The mediator shall have no liability for any act or omission in connection with the
3
Page 167 of 189

Page 17 of 20

January 4, 2008
10.
Conclusion of Mediation Process
If the parties reach a settlement, the mediation process shall be concluded by the execution
of a settlement agreement to be drafted by the parties themselves at the conclusion of the mediation
conference. After the initial conference, the mediation process also will be terminated if any party
or the mediator makes a formal written request for termination on the grounds that any further
efforts at mediation would no longer be worthwhile.
11.
Special Agreement.
The parties by special agreement have also entered into the following understanding
regarding the conduct of mediation:
12.
Fees and Expenses of the Mediator
a.
The parties have agreed that they will each be responsible for an equal share of the
fees and expenses of the mediator, unless there is specific written agreement otherwise.
b.
The initial $150.00 administrative fee paid to the Bar Association is not refundable.
The $450.00 initial mediator fee is only refundable up until the point in time that a mediator has
been appointed. After the appointment of the mediator, the $450.00 fee is not refundable. The
$450.00 covers the initial review and preparation for the mediation conference, as well as a two (2)
hour mediation conference. In the event that the initial mediation conference exceeds two (2) hours
in length, the parties agree to bear equally an hourly fee for the mediator in the amount of $150.00
per hour.
c.
Any expenses of the mediation process incurred by the mediator, such as travel
outside of Lancaster County, long distance telephone calls and/or photocopies, shall likewise be
borne equally by the parties.
4
Page 168 of 189

Page 18 of 20

January 4, 2008
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The undersigned parties, intending to be legally bound, acknowledge that we have read and
agree with the terms and scope of the Mediation Agreement set forth above.
Date:
Parties
Please sign this Agreement and return it to:

Lancaster Bar Association
Alternative Dispute Resolution Program
28 East Orange Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
5
Page 169 of 189

Page 19 of 20

January 4, 2008
Front Page Announcement

Mark Esterbrook hired as County Administrator
New County Administrator Hired
March 19, 2007 Start Date
The County's search for a County Administrator began on December 3, 2006, with
local and national advertising. That advertising campaign resulted in 44 applications,
which were reviewed by a Search Committee, from which they selected seven
candidates for interview and consideration by the Commissioners. Of that seven,
one was eliminated, three withdrew, and three were designated to interview with the
Board of Commissioners.
Mark Esterbrook, after his third interview session, was offered the position at a
salary of $110,000 and approved at the Salary Board Meeting on March 1, 2007 with
a scheduled start date of March 19, 2007.
Mr. Esterbrook has over 18 years of hands-on experience in program management,
operations, and technical system; and a proven track record of excellence in a broad
spectrum of leadership and operational assignments in the military, public, and
private sectors.
He holds an MA in Administrative Science-Organizational Management from George
Washington University, MBA from Incarnate Word College in San Antonio, Texas, and
a BS in Business Administration from Millersville University.

Page 170 of 189

Page 20 of 20

January 4, 2008

Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
August 12, 2016
Pennsylvania State Police
Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement (BLCE)
1800 Elmerton Ave.
Harrisburg, Pa 17110
BLCE Harrisburg Office
3655 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Phone: (717) 541-7961
Fax: (717) 541-7861
Re:
Daily Threats, Assaults, and Discrimination for the Malicious Purpose and
Conspiracy of Obstructing Justice and Due Process Efforts are Coordinated with
the Aid of Patrons and Staff
To Whom It May Concern:

I, Stanley J. Caterbone am again making an official complaint citing Act 14, dated June 30,
1987, enforcement of the Pennsylvania liquor code. This complaint is evidenced in various court
filings most recently the attached. I wish only to be contacted by written notice.
Nuisance Bars and Restaurants Include The Following:
Lucky Dog Tobias Frog Press Room Lancaster Dipco Cigar Bar Penn Square Grill at the
Marriott Tellus360 Annie Bailies The Rooftop/Altana Marion Court and Courtside Copper
Hill Jacks of Millersville House of Pizza House of Pasta Ruby Tuesday TGIF Yorgos Bistro Barberet and Bakery, and the Lancaster City Police Department
Liquor Control Enforcement
As a result of Act 14, dated June 30, 1987, enforcement of the Pennsylvania liquor code was
transferred from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board to the Pennsylvania State Police thus
forming the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement (BLCE).
The Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement's mission is to maintain or improve the quality of life for
the citizens of the Commonwealth through education and ensuring compliance with the provisions
of the Liquor Code, Title 40 and related statutes.
The Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement's purpose is to enforce the Commonwealth's Liquor
Laws. To effectively achieve State Police goals and objectives, the Bureau must assist individual
licensees, as well as the general community, in understanding the laws and regulations governing
the proper and lawful operation of a licensed liquor establishment.
COMPLAINT - v.
CATERBONE
Liquor
Lancaster
Control
City
Enforcement
Police Dept.
Page
Page
171
1 of 189
4
Thursday
Friday
December
August 12,
29, 2016

Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Complaint against Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
COMPLAINT - v.
CATERBONE
Liquor
Lancaster
Control
City
Enforcement
Police Dept.
Page
Page
172
2 of 189
4
Thursday
Friday
December
August 12,
29, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
August 9, 2016
Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States,
Washington, D. C. 20543
Re:
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Dear Clerk,
I am filing this Petition under duress and am aware of some deficiencies. Would you kindly
docket the Petition and I will cure the deficiencies at a later time. I am in extreme pain and want
to make sure that the assaults on my person are not successful in denying my right to appeal.
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Complaint against Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561
MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
COMPLAINT - v.
CATERBONE
Liquor
Lancaster
Control
City
Enforcement
Police Dept.
Page
Page
173
3 of 189
4
Thursday
Friday
December
August 12,
29, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PETITIONER
v.
Lancaster County Crisis Intervention, et.al.,
RESPONDANT
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CASE NO. __________

U.S. Third Circuit Court Case No. 16-1001
U.S. District Court Case No. 15-03984
:
:
:
A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

AND NOW, on this 8th day of August, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI according to Rules of Procedures of the United States Supreme Court and I, Stanley J.
Caterbone do hereby declare that this Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari should be reviewed due to it's
importance to the public of the issue.
Date: August 8, 2016
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States,
Washington, D. C. 20543
COMPLAINT - v.
CATERBONE
Liquor
Lancaster
Control
City
Enforcement
Police Dept.
Page
Page
174
4 of 189
4
Thursday
Friday
December
August 12,
29, 2016
Page 175 of 189
Page 176 of 189
Page 177 of 189
Page 178 of 189
Page 179 of 189
Page 180 of 189
Page 181 of 189
Page 182 of 189
Page 183 of 189
Page 184 of 189
Page 185 of 189
Page 186 of 189
Page 187 of 189
Page 188 of 189
Page 189 of 189

UPDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS Re CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department US District Court Case 08-cv-08982 December 28, 2016

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

UPDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS Re CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department US District Court Case 08-cv-08982 December 28, 2016

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

What Gives Them The Right?

%& '() %(* () +

What Gives Them The Right?

What Gives Them The Right?

What Gives Them The Right?

What Gives Them The Right?

What Gives Them The Right?

CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Dept.

Thursday December 29, 2016

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 37 Filed 04/15/16 Page

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 37 Filed 04/15/16 Page

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 37 Filed 04/15/16 Page

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 37 Filed 04/15/16 Page

United States District Court

CATERBONE et al v. LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU et al

Date Filed: 06/18/2008

represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

represented by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 37 Filed 04/15/16 Page

1 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(ti, )

2 ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS

3 COMPLAINT against LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER

4 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE..(ap, ) (Entered:

5 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED. THE

6 MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. with

7 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS GRANTED; THIS

PACER Service Center

am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

day of October, 2008, upon

consideration of plaintiffs Motion for Withdraw Without

Plaintiffs Motion for Withdraw Without Prejudice is

This case shall remain CLOSED statistically.

/S/ MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN, J.

Civil Rights Division Home Page

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 37 Filed 04/15/16 Page

ADDRESSING POLICE MISCONDUCT

LAWS ENFORCED BY THE

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Federal Criminal Enforcement

Civil Rights Division Home Page

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 37 Filed 04/15/16 Page

Federal Civil Enforcement

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Civil Rights Division Home Page

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 37 Filed 04/15/16 Page

How to File a Complaint with DOJ

Civil Rights Division Home Page

Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document 37 Filed 04/15/16 Page

Return to Conduct of Law Enforcement Agencies Page

What Gives Them The Right?

1250 Fremont Street

DECLARATION BY STAN J. CATERBONE re LANCASTER CITY

1250 Fremont Street

CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Dept.

Thursday December 29, 2016

What Gives Them The Right?

District Attorney: Police Shooting of

Thursday December 29, 2016

What Gives Them The Right?