Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1Mechanisms
2Deposits
o
2.1Hyaloclastite
2.2Hyalotuff
3Surface features
3.1Tuff rings
3.2Tuff cones
4.2Pinatubo, 1991
4.3Lake Taupo
5See also
6References
7Further reading
Mechanisms[edit]
Several competing theories exist as to the exact
mechanism of ash formation. The most common is the
theory of explosive thermal contraction of particles under
rapid cooling from contact with water. In many cases the
water is supplied by the sea, for example with Surtsey. In
other cases the water may be present in a lake or calderalake, for example Santorini, where the phreatomagmatic
component of the Minoan eruption was a result of both a
lake and later the sea. There have also been examples of
interaction between magma and water in an aquifer. Many
Deposits[edit]
Phreatomagmatic ash is formed by the same mechanisms
across a wide range of compositions, basic and acidic.
Blocky and equant clasts with low vesicule content are
formed. The deposits of phreatomagmatic explosive
eruptions are also believed to be better sorted and finer
grained than the deposits of magmatic eruption. This is a
result of the much higher fragmentation of
phreatomagmatic eruptions.
Hyaloclastite[edit]
Hyaloclastite is glass found with pillow basalts that were
produced by non-explosive quenching and fracturing of
basaltic glass. These are still classed as phreatomagmatic
eruptions, as they produce juvenile clasts from the
interaction of water and magma. They can be formed at
water depths of >500 m,[1] where hydrostatic pressure is
high enough to inhibit vesiculation in basaltic magma.
Hyalotuff[edit]
Hyalotuff is a type of rock formed by the explosive
fragmentation of glass during phreatomagmatic eruptions
at shallow water depths (or within aquifers). Hyalotuffs
have a layered nature that is believed to be a result of
dampened oscillation in discharge rate, with a period of
several minutes.[2] The deposits are much finer grained
than the deposits of magmatic eruptions, due to the much
higher fragmentation of the type of eruption. The deposits
appear better sorted than magmatic deposits in the field
because of their fine nature, but grain size analysis
reveals that the deposits are much more poorly sorted
than their magmatic counterparts. A clast known as an
accretionary lapilli is distinctive to phreatomagmatic
deposits, and is a major factor for identification in the field.
Accretionary lapilli form as a result of the cohesive
properties of wet ash, causing the particles to bind. They
have a circular structure when specimens are viewed in
hand and under the microscope.[1]
A further control on the morphology and characteristics of
a deposit is the water to magma ratio. It is believed that
the products of phreatomagmatic eruptions are fine
grained and poorly sorted where the magma/water ratio is
high, but when there is a lower magma/water ratio the
deposits may be coarser and better sorted.[3]
Surface features[edit]
Tuff rings[edit]
Tuff rings have a low profile apron of tephra surrounding a
wide crater (called a maar crater) that is generally lower
than the surrounding topography. The tephra is often
unaltered and thinly bedded, and is generally considered
to be an ignimbrite, or the product of a pyroclastic density
current. They are built around a volcanic vent located in
a lake, coastal zone, marsh or an area of
abundant groundwater.
Tuff cones[edit]
Tuff cones are steep sloped and cone shaped. They have
wide craters and are formed of highly altered, thickly
bedded tephra. They are considered to be a taller variant
of a tuff ring, formed by less powerful eruptions. Tuff cones
are usually small in height. Koko Crater is 1,208 feet.[6]
Examples of phreatomagmatic
eruptions[edit]
Pinatubo, 1991[edit]
Lake Taupo[edit]
The Hatepe eruption in 232+/-12 AD was the latest major
eruption at Lake Taupo in New Zealand's Taupo Volcanic
See also[edit]
Wikimedia
Commons has
media related
to Phreatomagmat
ic explosions.
Phreatic eruption
Volcanic ash
Maar
Volcanic pipe
References[edit]
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Jump up^ Wilson, C. J. N. & Walker G. P. L. 1985. The
Taupo Eruption, New Zealand I. General Aspects.
Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London,
314, 199-228. doi:10.1098/rsta.1985.0019