Dalit outrage in Gujarat has exposed the hypocrisy of the Bharatiya Janata Party.
he 11 July public flogging of four Dalit men with iron rods
in Gujarats Una town for allegedly killing the cow they were skinning is an incident that would probably have disappeared in the list of atrocities that people born Dalit in this country are compelled to face virtually on a daily basis. The local newspapers might have reported it; the police, who were silent bystanders, would have dragged their feet to register a case; and the perpetrators of the crime would have walked away. The crucial difference is that this occurred in 2016, when the men beating the Dalits operated under the supreme arrogance and confidence that what they were doing was part of their righteous duty. As gau rakshaks, protectors of the cow, they had taken the cue from the party in power in the state and the centre, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), that any action taken to protect the cow was justified, even if it meant taking the law into their hands. That their arrogance finally led to their undoing, when they uploaded a video of the beating on social media, was happenstance; without that Una town would not have been in the news, politicians of all hues would not have rushed there to milk the political fallout of the incident and the Dalit victims would have returned to their wretched existence of a life where there is no hope of any justice. It would also not have exposed the extreme physical brutality that is virtually routine in the case of atrocities against Dalits. While the attention drawn to the ghastly Una incident has resulted in six arrests and the suspension of six policemen, what was not expected was the reaction from Dalits across the state. They have come out in large numbers to protest, they have flung carcasses of dead cows in front of police stations and government offices and they are refusing to continue skinning dead cows, a task that is done exclusively by Dalits. Even Prime Minister Narendra Modis hometown of Vadnagar saw a Dalit demonstration with slogans directed against him. This had never happened in all the 12 years he ruled Gujarat or since he became Prime Minister. In effect, this has blown the lid of the famed Gujarat model and exposed the deep caste divide that continues with Dalits leading a largely separate and marginalised existence. Even if Gujarat has not witnessed the vicious caste riots like the ones that paralysed the state in the 1980s during the anti-reservation agitations, the fissures in Gujarati society along caste lines have remained as strong as before and the criminal justice system continues to let them down. According to data Economic & Political Weekly
EPW
JUly 30, 2016
vol lI no 31
assembled by the website IndiaSpend, in 2014 only 3.4% of
crimes against Scheduled Castes in Gujarat led to conviction; the national average was 28.8% that year. The political fallout of Una on the BJP in Gujarat could be significant. In the past, the party did not go out of its way to woo Dalits in the belief it did not need their vote, as they comprise a little less than 8% of the population. Today, with elections coming up in Uttar Pradesh (UP) and Punjab, and later in Gujarat, it cannot afford to alienate them leading to a possible consolidation of an anti-BJP grouping comprising Muslims and Dalits. It might be too early to conclude that this incident in Gujarat is the beginning of the unravelling of the Modi juggernaut, for there are two distinct aspects of Dalit consolidation. One is the more spontaneous expression seen after Rohith Vemulas death in Hyderabad in January this year and the recent developments in Gujarat. These protests stand out for their novel and different approach to a shameful reality that Indians refuse to confront: the entrenched caste bias at every level of our society. How long such expressions of anger and dissent can hold without being taken over by mainstream politics remains to be seen but what needs to be noted is that they are happening. The second is the fillip these Dalit agitations are giving to established Dalit politics. Thus, Mayawati is able to use the Una incident, in addition to the fallout following BJPs Daya Shankar Singhs derogatory comment about her, to her advantage as UP warms up to the forthcoming assembly elections. The Congress in Gujarat will no doubt try to capitalise on the Dalit agitation to regain some of its lost support base. What will be equally interesting to watch is how the BJP handles these developments. So far the two men who should have said something about the Una attack, Modi and BJP chief Amit Shah, have maintained a studious silence. The latter is clearly allowing Gujarat Chief Minister Anandiben Patel to face the flak in the hope that she will flounder and perhaps fall. The former appears so intent on projecting himself as a world leader that he doggedly refuses to be drawn into local affairs, even if they have serious political ramifications for his party. What is evident already is that the BJPs grand plan to build up support amongst Dalits in UP is crumbling. This is not surprising. The inevitable fallout of the cow politics that the BJP and its ideological fraternity are pursuing with such vigour is the alienation of not just Muslims but also Dalits. 7