Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Rsum
Les gtes de sulfures massifs volcanognes (SMV) sont connus sous diverses appellations parmi lesquelles on peut
mentionner les gtes de sulfures massifs associs des roches volcaniques, encaisss dans des roches volcaniques ou
logs dans des assemblages volcano-sdimentaires. Ils constituent des sources considrables de Zn, Cu, Pb, Ag et Au,
ainsi que des sources importantes de Co, Sn, Se, Mn, Cd, In, Bi, Te, Ga et Ge. Ils consistent gnralement en lentilles
de sulfures massifs polymtalliques formes dans des milieux volcaniques sous-marins, au sein ou proximit du fond
ocanique, et sont classs daprs leur contenu en mtaux communs ou en or ou selon la lithologie des roches encaissantes. Prs de 350 gtes SMV ont t dcouverts au Canada et plus de 800, de par le monde. Dans lhistoire de la production minire du Canada, 27 % du cuivre, 49 % du zinc, 20 % du plomb, 40 % de largent et 3 % de lor ont t
extraits de gisements SMV. On trouve de tels gtes aussi bien dans des terrains volcaniques sous-marins datant de 3,4
Ga que dans les fonds ocaniques actuels o de nouveaux gtes sont en cours de formation. La caractristique la plus
commune tous les gtes de SMV tient leur formation dans des milieux tectoniques de distension, parmi lesquels on
peut mentionner les fonds ocaniques en expansion et les arcs. La plupart des anciens gtes SMV conservs dans les
archives gologiques se sont forms dans des milieux ocaniques et continentaux darc naissant, darc de divergence
et darrire-arc. Quelques-uns des districts gisements SMV les plus importants dans le monde sur le plan conomique
se trouvent dans des terrains ocaniques primitifs darc de divergence caractriss par un volcanisme bimodal dominante mafique, de mme que dans des terrains continentaux darrire arc caractriss par un volcanisme bimodal dominante felsique et la prsence de matriaux silicoclastiques. La plupart des principaux districts miniers gisements SMV
consistent en amas de gisements forms dans des rifts ou des caldeiras. Leur regroupement est attribuable lexistence
dune source de chaleur commune qui donne naissance de vastes rseaux de convection de fluides sous le plancher
ocanique. Les intrusions subvolcaniques qui produisent cette chaleur peuvent aussi fournir des mtaux aux rseaux
hydrothermaux des gtes SMV par le biais dun dgagement magmatique de matires volatiles. En raison de lcoulement de fluides sur une grande tendue, les districts miniers gisements SMV se caractrisent souvent par la prsence
de vastes zones semi-concordantes daltration hydrothermale, qui gagnent en intensit pour devenir des zones daltration discordantes, dans lponte infrieure et lponte suprieure immdiates des gisements. Ces districts se distinguent
aussi par la prsence dunits minces mais tendues de sdiments chimiques ferrugineux qui rsultent de lexhalaison
et de la diffusion de particules hydrothermales.
Definition
Volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits are also
known as volcanic-associated, volcanic-hosted, and volcano-sedimentary-hosted massive sulphide deposits. They
typically occur as lenses of polymetallic massive sulphide
that form at or near the seafloor in submarine volcanic environments. They form from metal-enriched fluids associated
Galley, A.G., Hannington, M.D., and Jonasson, I.R., 2007, Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits, in Goodfellow, W.D., ed., Mineral Deposits of Canada:
A Synthesis of Major Deposit-Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods: Geological Association of
Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Special Publication No. 5, p. 141-161.
COLLAPSED AREA
ANHYDRITE CONE
WHITE SMOKERS
SULFIDE TALUS
ANHYDRITE
SEALED
ZONE
PYRITE
Zn-RICH MARGINAL
FACIES
QUARTZ
GRADATIONAL CONTACT
ALTERATION PIPE
FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram of the modern TAG sulphide deposit on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. This represents a classic cross-section of a VMS deposit, with concordant semi-massive to massive sulphide lens underlain by a discordant stockwork vein system and associated alteration halo, or pipe. From Hannington et al.
(1998).
Cu
Cu
World VMS
(Modified from
Franklin, 1996)
1-100
100-1000
Zn-Pb-Cu
1000-10 000
-Z
>10 000
Zn-Cu
Pb-Zn
Pb
Zn
VMS deposits
SEDEX deposits
Cu
Cu
Canadian VMS
-Z
Cu
142
100 M
Cu
Zn-Pb-Cu
Zn-Cu
Pb-Zn
Pb
SEDEX deposits
Zn
VMS deposits
FIGURE 2. Base metal classification scheme of worldwide and Canadian VMS deposits as defined by Franklin
et al. (1981) and modified by Large (1992) to include the Zn-Pb-Cu class. The preponderance of Cu-Zn and
Zn-Cu VMS deposits in Canada is due to the abundance of Precambrian primitive oceanic arc settings.
Worldwide, there is a larger proportion of felsic-hosted, more Pb-rich continental rift and continent margin
arc settings.
Gold (ppm)
AURIFEROUS
MT MORGAN
BOUSQUET NO 2
HORNE
BOLIDEN
RAMBLER CONS
LA RONDE
ESKAY CREEK
Cu+Zn+Pb (%)
100 m
Canadian grade
and tonnage
Average 1.3 Mt
Median 2.3Mt
3.2% Cu
1.9% Zn
0.0% Pb
15 g/t Ag
2.5 g/t Au
Chlorite-sericite alteration
+ jasper infilling
Pillowed mafic
flows
Banded jasperchert-sulphide
Sphalerite-chalcoppyrite
-rich margin
Pyrite-quartz breccia
Massive pyrite
BIMODAL-MAFIC
Lobe-hyaloclastite
rhyolite
Pillowed mafic
flows
Sericite-chlorite
Quartz-pyrite stockwork
Quartz-chlorite
Chlorite-pyrite stockwork
Chlorite-sulphide
Massive magnetitepyrrhotite-chalcopyrite
Pyrrhotite-pyritechalcopyrite stockwork
BIMODAL-FELSIC
100 m
Barite (Au)
Chlorite-sericite
Pyrite-sphalerite-galena
Carbonate/
gypsum
Quartz-chlorite
Chalcopyritepyrite veins
Massive
Sericite-quartz Detrital
Pyrite-sphalerite-chalcopyrite
Chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite-pyrite
Argillite-shale
Alkaline basalt
Felsic epiclastic
Basement sediments
200 m
Felsic
lava
dome
Quartz-sericieAl silicate
(advanced argillic)
Sericite-quartz-pyrite
(argillic)
Carbonaceous shale
Chlorite-pyrrhotite-pyrite
-chalcopyrte-(Au)
Massive fine-grained and
layered pyrite
Siliceous stockwork
Layered pyrite-sphaleritegalena-Ag-Au (transitional ore)
500 m
Massive pyrrhotite-pyritechalcopyrite-(Au)
Infilling and
Realgar-cinnabar-stibnite
replacement
Arsenopyrite-stibnitetetrahedrite-Pb sulphosalts
Quartz-pyrite-arsenopyritesphalerite-galena-tetrahedrite veins
Laminated argillite
and shale
Canadian grade
and tonnage
Felsic volcaniclastic
and epiclastic
Sulphidic tuffite/exhalite
Massive pyrite-sphalerite
-chalcopyrite
Massive pyritepyrrhotite-chalcopyrite
Felsic
clastic
FELSICSILICICLASTIC
Average 9.2 Mt
Median 64.4 Mt
0.98% Cu
4.7% Zn
2.0% Pb
53 g/t Ag
0.93 g/t Au
200 m
HYBRID
BIMODAL-FELSIC
Shale/argillite
Canadian grade
and tonnage
Average 5.5 Mt
Median 14.2 Mt
1.3% Cu
6.1% Zn
1.8% Pb
123 g/t Ag
2.2 g/t Au
Canadian grade
and tonnage
Average 6.3 Mt
Median 113.9 Mt
1.7% Cu
5.1% Zn
0.6% Pb
45 g/t Ag
1.4 g/t Au
PELITICMAFIC
Canadian grade
and tonnage
Average 34.3 Mt
Median 148 Mt
Basalt sill/flow
Laminated argillite
and shale
Pyrrhotite-pyrite-magnetite
transition zone
Pyrrhotite-pyrite-chalcopyrite zone
Pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-pyritesphalerite stockwork zone
200 m
1.6% Cu
2.6% Zn
0.36% Pb
29 g/t Ag
<0.9 g/t Au
Chert-carbonate-sulphide
Pyrite-sphalerite zone
Massive pyrite zone
FIGURE 4. Graphic representation of the lithological classifications modified from Barrie and Hannington (1999) by Franklin et al. (2005), with the addition
of the hybrid bimodal felsic as a VMS-epithermal subtype of bimodal-felsic. Average and median sizes for each type for representative Canadian deposits
shown, along with average grade.
FIGURE 5. Geographical distribution of ancient VMS deposits, with major districts highlighted with respect to known aggregate geological reserves (see Table
1). Modified from Sinclair et al. (1999) and Franklin et al. (2005).
canic intrusions may also account for anomalous Se, Sn, In,
Bi, Te, and possibly Au and Sb contents (Hannington et al.,
1999c; Yang and Scott, 2003; Dub et al., 2004).
Geological Attributes
Tectonic Environment
The most common feature among all types of VMS
deposits is that they are formed in extensional tectonic settings, including both oceanic seafloor spreading and arc
environments (Fig. 11). Modern seafloor VMS deposits are
recognized in both oceanic spreading ridge and arc environments (Herzig and Hannington, 1995), but deposits that are
Deposit/District, Country
Brooks Range, Alaska
Finlayson Lake, Yukon
Windy Craggy, BC & Green's Creek, Alaska
Northern Cordillera, British Columbia
Myra Falls, British Columbia
Shasta, California
Jerome, Arizona
Central Mexico
Tambo Grande, Peru
Amazonian craton, Brazil
Slave Province, Northwest Territories, Nunavut
Ruttan, Manitoba
Flin Flon-Snow Lake, Manitoba
Geco, Manitouwadge, Ontario
Sturgeon Lake, Ontario
Ladysmith-Rhinelander, Wisconsin/Michigan
Abitibi, Ontario-Quebec
Bathurst, New Brunswick
Dunnage Zone, Newfoundland
Iberian Pyrite Belt, Spain & Portugal
Avoca, Ireland
Trondhjeim, Norway
Tonnage (Mt)
35
20
300
100
35
35
40
120
200
35
30
85
150
60
35
80
600
495
75
1575
37
100
No.*
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41-42
43
44
45
46
Deposit/District, Country
Skellefte, Sweden
Outokumpu-Pyhasalmi, Finland
Bergslagen-Orijarvi, Sweden & Finland
Preiska, South Africa
Troodos, Cyprus
Black Sea, Turkey
Saudi Arabia
Semail, Oman
Southern Urals, Russia / Kazahkstan
Central Urals, Russia
Rudny Altai, Kazahkstan / Russia
Altai Shan, Mongolia
North Qilian, China
Sanjiang, China
Bawdwin-Laochang, Burma /
Hokuroku, Japan
Besshi, Japan
Phillipines arc
Pilbara, Yilgarn Western Australia
Central Queensland, Australia
Lachlan Fold Belt, Australia
Mt. Read, Tasmania
Sino-Korean Platform
Tonnage (Mt)
70
90
110
45
35
200
70
30
400
100
400
40
100
50
40
80
230
65
75
80
100
200
40
145
U.
S.
A.
Archean craton
262
261
230
224-226
234
223
222
231,
232 228,229
259
260
257
256
251-255
227
233,235
258
263
249
169
58
59
57
250
50
243
247,248
245
246
240
242 237-239
241
244
1-27
194,195
211
176
221
202 170
217 196-201
218
Fig. 2F
220
171-175,
219
177-193
203-210,
212 -216
236
29
75
73
72
77-79
83 80, 82
70, 71
84-140
Fig. 2D, E
168 165
157
158
166, 167
U.S.A.
km
28
32-49, 51-56
160-164
159
74
76
155, 156
150
149
145
142, 143
30
60
31
62-65
61
66
68, 69 67
81
1000
FIGURE 6. Distribution of VMS deposits in Canada by geologic province. Numbers correspond to deposits listed in the national VMS database (Appendix 1).
Location
Brunswick No. 12
Kidd Creek
(1) Mt
229.8
149.3
Cu
wt.%
0.46
2.89
Zn
wt.%
7.66
6.36
Pb
wt.%
3.01
0.22
Ag
g/t
91
92
Au
g/t
0.46
0.05
Age
Ordovician
Archean
(181 mined +
all resources)
146
88.1
47.3
29.3
20
19.3
14.5
10.2
9.16
5.2
5.1
4
3.2
2.8
1.28
0.32 1.71
0.98 1.98
1.83 6.25
1.83 5.59
3.1 1.71
3.32 5.78
2.11 4.79
1.41 3.59
3.24 5.97
1.24 15.82
0.33
5.4
1.5 13.77
0.15 9.36
5.27 1.44
0.55
1.1
2.2
0.4
40.9
20
49
17.4
28.7
37.7
15
23.5
61.5
29.4
998
43.5
22
10.6
5.07
Archean
0.9
Archean
2.01
Devonian
1.73 Paleoproterozic
0.83
Archean
2.71 Paleoproterozic
1.4
Archean
2.08 Paleoproterozic
0.88
Ordovician
0.38
Archean
26.4
Jurassic
0.76
Archean
0.4 Paleoproterozic
2.09 Paleoproterozoic
30
2.0
31
1.24 1.34
1.0
0.5
20
1.44
1.5
115
25
2.60
TOTAL TONNAGE
in billion tonnes
5
4
3
2
1
0.18
33
25
15
20
35
15
46
10
AVERAGE TONNAGE
in million tonnes
12
6
2.8
NUMBER OF DEPOSITS
284
300
255
200
100
Zn (wt.%)
BIMODAL-MAFIC
e.g. Preiska,
South Africa &
San Nicolas, Mexico
1.5 Pb (wt.%)
1
0.5
80
60
40
20
5.2
5.1
113
r u Ne
ns w
w
ic
k
Q
ue
be
c
O
nt
ar
io
C Br
ol it
um is
h
bi
a
M
an
N
ito
ew
ba
La fou
br nd
ad la
or nd
N
un
av
ut
Yu
Sa
ko
sk
n
at
ch
ew
an
N
o
Te rth
rr we
ito s
rie t
N
ov
s
a
Sc
ot
ia
MAFIC
(Ophiolite type)
e.g. Troodos, Cyprus
MAFICSILICICLASTIC
e.g. Besshi, Japan
11.0
10
42
5
23.7
62
3
2
1
Cu (wt.%)
2
1.5
1
0.5
Ag (g/t)
Au (g/t)
BIMODAL-FELSIC
e.g. Mount Lyell,
Tasmania
BIMODALSILICICLASTIC
e.g. Rio Tinto,
Spain
97
Province
FIGURE 7. Histogram of the total tonnage of base metals from known VMS
deposits per province; also shown are the number of deposits. The aggregate tonnage was calculated by total metals represent divided by geological
reserves (proven, possible, and probable; non 43-101 compliant).
2.5
Number of Deposits
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
500
200
100
50
Windy Craggy
Kidd Creek, Brunswick 12
Flin Flon, Caribou, LaRonde, Horne, Geco
20
10
5
2
1.0
0.5
0.2
1.49
1.5
1.0
0.5
TOTAL TONNAGE
in billion tonnes
2.0
25
20
0.34 0.35
0.03
34.3
AVERAGE
TONNAGE
in million
tonnes
15
10
5
0.36
7.5
Zn
(wt.%)
5
4
3
2
1
1.5
Pb (wt.%)
1
0.5
80
60
40
20
4.7
NUMBER OF DEPOSITS
300
2
1
197
73
100
24
Cu (wt.%)
8.73
1.2
200
2
1.5
1
0.5
40
Ag (g/t)
Au (g/t)
109
MAFIC
(Ophiolite type)
e.g. Tilt Cove,
Newfoundland
BIMODAL-MAFIC
e.g. Noranda, Quebec
& Kidd Creek, Ontario
MAFICSILICICLASTIC
e.g. Windy Craggy,
British Columbia
BIMODAL-FELSIC
e.g. Myra Falls,
British Columbia
BIMODALSILICICLASTIC
e.g. Bathurst No. 12,
New Brunswick
COUNTRY
Orogen
Spain
Spain
Russia
Canada
Portugal
Russia
Portugal
Canada
Russia
Spain
USA
Hercynian
Hercynian
Baikal-Vitim
N.Cordilleran
Hercynian
Uralides (Hercynian)
Hercynian
Appalachian
Uralides (Hercynian)
Hercynian
Grenvillean? (Oecee)
Canada
Canada
Russia
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
China
Spain
Russia
Spain
Russia
Russia
Georgia
Abitibi (Kenoran)
Abitibi (Kenoran)
Baikal-Vitim
Altaides (Hercynian)
Altaides (Hercynian)
Yidun, Indosinian (Tethyan)
Hercynian
Uralides (Hercynian)
Hercynian
Uralides (Hercynian)
Uralides (Hercynian)
Caucasian (Tethyan)
Australia
France
Spain
Canada
Namibia
Russia
Turkey
Canada
Peru
Mexico
Finland
Spain
Spain
Canada
Mongolia
Canada
USA
Canada
Sweden
Kazakhstan
Canada
Peru
China
Canada
Australia
Finland
Kazakhstan
Portugal
Canada
Kazakhstan
South Africa
Canada
Japan
Spain
China
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
China
China
USA
Australia
China
Kazakhstan
Norway
USA
USA
Japan
Canada
Canada
Sweden
Eritrea
Finland
Sweden
Russia
Canada
Canada
Spain
Canada
Russia
USA
148
Mtonnes Ore
(Geol.)
CU
%
PB
%
1200.00
335.00
300.00
297.40
270.00
269.00
250.00
229.80
205.00
164.00
163.34
0.15
0.39
0.04
1.38
1.59
1.2
1.2
0.46
1.4
1.2
1
147.88
144.00
130.00
125.00
125.00
124.00
120.00
115.00
110.00
107.00
106.00
102.60
2.31
1
0.01
0.3
0.4
0.72
0.5
1
0.5
1.9
1.1
1.29
Tasman
Caledonian
Hercynian
Abitibi (Kenoran)
Gariep
Uralides (Hercynian)
Pontides (Tethyan)
Trans-Hudson
S.Cordilleran
C.Cordilleran
Svecokarelian
Hercynian
Hercynian
Appalachian
Kazakh-Mongol(Hercyn.)
Appalachian
Trans-Hudson
Trans-Hudson
Svecokarelian
Altaides (Hercynian)
West.Superior (Kenoran)
S.Cordilleran
Indosinian (Tethyan)
Abitibi (Kenoran)
Tasman
Svecokarelian
Altaides (Hercynian)
Hercynian
98.57
90.74
90.00
88.00
85.00
84.10
83.14
82.80
82.00
79.90
75.70
75.20
70.00
69.90
68.00
64.69
63.50
62.93
60.00
60.00
58.40
56.20
54.00
53.70
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
1.17
0.6
0.51
0.3
N.Cordilleran
Altaides (Hercynian)
Namaqua
N.Cordilleran
Japan arcs(Tethyan)
Hercynian
Sino-Korean Platform
Altaides (Hercynian)
Altaides (Hercynian)
Altayshan (Hercynides)
Tarim-NorthQilian (Caled.)
N.Cordilleran
Tasman
Yidun, Indosinian (Tethyan)
Altaides (Hercynian)
Caledonian
Yavapai
Appalachian
Japan arcs(Tethyan)
Abitibi (Kenoran)
N.Cordilleran
Svecokarelian
Pan African
Svecokarelian
Svecokarelian
Uralides (Hercynian)
Trans-Hudson
Abitibi (Kenoran)
Hercynian
N.Cordilleran
Altaides (Hercynian)
N.Cordilleran
49.31
48.00
47.00
45.95
43.50
41.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
34.00
34.00
32.93
32.70
31.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
29.98
29.95
29.90
29.32
29.00
28.60
28.10
28.10
27.50
27.23
25.60
25.20
25.06
25.00
25.00
1.08 0.033
0.16 1.43
1.7
1.37
1.2
1.5
1.3 0.91
1.75
2.3
1.3
2.4
0.5
2.51
1.26 3.39
4
0.8
0.58
4.4
2.5
2.6
2.4
2.3 0.02
4.8
1.03 <0.05
2.6
1.21
1.83 0.55
0.3
3.3
1.52
0.48 0.36
3
1.5
3.04
0.9
0.1
0.42
1.25 1.69
1.79 0.021
1.46 2.01
0.32
5.1
2.01
0.76
1.37
1
1.34
0.9
0.56
0.34
0.98
0.51
1
2.2
0.12
0.79
0.15
1.2
3.01
0.06
1.1
0.22
1.2
2
2.7
4.62
0.6
0.04
0.6
0.1
0.01
0.85
0.71
0.13
0.05
0.08
0.3
0.06
1.34
2.25
0.89
1.2
1.6
3.2
0.5
0.9
1.86 0.15
1.6
0.3
1.23
2.2
0.7 0.05
3.3 0.005
1.4
1.6
0.7
0.8
ZN
%
0.15
0.34
5.2
0.25
1.41
0.7
3.2
7.66
0.5
2.5
0.9
6.18
0.9
6.2
4
4.5
6.66
1.3
1.56
2.7
1.2
3.8
1.8
0.04
1.5
1.8
1.7
8.05
1.3
0.03
1.63
1.4
2.27
1.9
3.16
3.92
2.69
2
4.29
6.5
4.1
10.4
5.3
3.45
1
1.57
0.1
1.07
2.2
1.4
0.26
4.04
3.8
4.7
3.1
2.4
7.5
2.1
2.98
5.33
5.5
14.5
0.62
9.2
1.8
0.2
1.12
0.3
1.91
6.25
5.3
4.63
5.12
4
1.4
3.27
5.1
3.63
0.1
9.81
13.9
AU
(g/t)
0.36
0.22
1.10
1.00
0.46
1.10
1.80
0.30
0.01
1.40
AG
(g/t)
7.00
22.00
3.83
9.87
7.70
38.00
91.00
7.90
47.00
3.00
87.00
2.50 10.00
0.13 20.00
0.46 157.00
0.80 38.00
0.60 16.00
0.70 22.00
2.50 16.00
1.10 15.50
0.73
4.31
0.39
1.50
0.48
5.07
7.20
21.00
37.00
40.90
1.49
0.05
0.49
0.80
0.53
0.20
0.21
27.60
3.70
13.11
25.00
30.00
14.00
24.00
62.00
47.00
53.00
51.00
0.54
0.21
1.89
2.85
0.90
0.50
0.42
6.10
4.70
0.07
1.20
0.70
43.20
69.00
15.00
50.06
26.00
4.73
13.00
0.60
9.00
143.00
21.00
0.34
4.03
1.54 32.80
0.00
0.17
9.92
0.40 68.00
0.50 37.00
0.77 32.40
0.75 75.00
0.80 47.00
0.57 104.03
2.28 126.20
0.70 55.00
2.70 145.00
2.00 119.00
0.29 19.00
1.37 49.70
0.51 14.40
0.70 21.00
0.63 37.02
2.00 49.00
0.65 98.00
1.68 46.80
0.49 25.00
3.00 20.00
1.32 25.00
0.34 16.43
0.30 21.60
0.38 38.00
0.17 10.63
5.61 706.00
Orebody Age
(est. Ma)
320
320
750
220
320
395
320
465
395
320
1000
2714
2698
500
400
395
200
320
392
320
392
392
70
495
600
320
2710
752
392
175
1900
104
136
1921
320
320
465
380
465
1870
1875
1890
395
2720
104
260
2700
385
1970
375
300
150
395
1300
195
15
320
3000
390
392
375
440
365
495
430
395
450
1800
430
210
2730
365
1890
850
1910
1875
392
1900
2725
320
190
375
220
1.
0
4.
0
Cu+Zn+Pb (%)
10.0
10
.0
Flin Flon
M
Geco t Brunswick #12
Kidd Creek
Ruttan
Caribou
Windy Craggy
1.0
0.1
0.0
0.01
0.1
1.0
10
100
1,000
Tonnage (Mt)
100.0
Eskay
Creek
Bousquet 2 Horne
Au (g/tonne)
10.0
LaRonde-Penna
Flin Flon
Caribou
1.0
10
0t
on
10
ne
s
to
nn
0.1
es
1t
on
ne
0.0
0.01
0.1
1.0
10
100
1,000
Tonnage (Mt)
Ocean
Island
Ocean
Spreading
Centre
Mature Oceanic
Arc
Back-Arc
Ocean crust
Lithosphere
Asthenosphere
VMS deposits
Rifted
Arc
Nascent
Arc
Back-Arc
Spreading
Centre
Continental
Arc
Arc assemblage
Continental crust
Siliciclastic strata
Epithermal Au
Orogenic Au
Back-Arc
Extension
Fe-formation
Granitoid
Mafic-ultramafic
intrusion
Porphyry Cu-Au
(+ skarns)
FIGURE 11. There are three principal tectonic environments in which VMS
deposits form, each representing a stage in the formation of the Earths
crust. (A) Early Earth evolution was dominated by mantle plume activity,
during which numerous incipient rift events formed basins characterized by
early ocean crust in the form of primitive basalts and/or komatiites, followed by siliciclastic infill and associated Fe-formation and mafic-ultramafic sills. In the Phanerozoic, similar types of incipient rifts formed during transpressional, back-arc rifting (Windy Craggy). (B) The formation of
ocean basins was associated with the development of ocean spreading centers along which mafic-dominated VMS deposits formed. The development
of subduction zones resulted in oceanic arc formation with associated
extensional domains in which bimodal mafic, bimodal felsic, and maficdominated VMS deposits formed. (C) The formation of mature arc and
ocean-continent subduction fronts resulted in successor arc and continental
volcanic arc assemblages that host most of the felsic-dominated and
bimodal siliciclastic deposits. Thin black arrows represent direction of
extension and thick, pale arrows represent mantle movement. Modified
from Groves et al., 1998
149
5 km
District-Scale Environments
Most, but not all VMS deposits, occur in clusters that
define major mining camps. Sangster (1980) used the distribution of VMS deposits within well known mining districts
in Canada to indicate that there was a first-order regional
control on their distribution (Fig. 12). In general, the deposit
clusters are restricted to either linear rifts or calderas. These
features are generated by regional thinning of the basement,
decompression melting of the underlying mantle, and generation of mafic magmas (Fig. 13). In ocean spreading-ridge
settings, these magmas rise to within a few thousand metres
of the seafloor to form elongate gabbroic sills that parallel
the seafloor-spreading axes (Stinton and Detrick, 1992).
Where pre-existing ocean-floor or arc lithosphere is present,
these mafic magmas, at temperatures of 1000 to 1400C,
may underplate the crust, producing intermediate to felsic
partial melts and bimodal mafic intrusive/extrusive assemblages. The associated gabbro-diorite-tonalite-trondhjemite
intrusive complexes may rise to within 2 to 3 km of the
seafloor (Galley, 2003, and references therein). Where extension is taking place in thicker (20-30 km) crust, such as in a
continental back-arc setting, magmas may form mid-crustal
intrusions. These melts may not intrude into their comagmatic volcanic assemblages but may remain in the underlying basement rocks. These different scenarios result in multiple forms of district-scale alteration and deposit characteristics for a VMS district.
The presence of either mafic or composite high-level subvolcanic intrusions within a rift or caldera setting will drive
a subseafloor hydrothermal-fluid convection system (Galley,
1993; Alt, 1995) (Fig. 14). Connate seawater in the porous
crust is first heated, causing it to become buoyant. As this
heated water rises up synvolcanic fault structures, cold seawater is drawn in above the cooling intrusion. These originally cold, near neutral pH fluids are progressively heated
during their downward migration, interacting with the surrounding rocks at progressively higher temperatures. The
isotherms above cooling sill complexes are generally hori150
2 km
5 km
20 km
Mantle decompression
and melting (>1300C)
Crust
Felsic melts
Mantle
Mafic melt
+ Si,Fe,Mn
5000 m
+ K,Mg,SO 4
200C
300C
400C
Deep Intrusion
SHALLOW CONVECTION
2000 m
Si, Fe, S
+ K,Mg,SO 4
+ Na, Mg
- Si,Na,Ca,
Fe,Zn,Cu
+ Si, Ca
300C
400C
Zeolite
2000 m
200C
Fe,Zn,
Cu,Si
Mn,Si,Ni
Mg metasomatism
Spilitization
Silicification
Greenschist
Amphibolite
Epidosite
Recharge zone
Impermeable
barrier
Reservoir
zone
Magmatic Component?
FORMATION OF HYDROTHERMAL CELLS
the seafloor are zeolite-clay and related subgreenschist mineral assemblages characterized by K-Mg-rich smectites,
mixed-layer chlorites, and K-feldspar. In some regional
hydrothermal systems, the low-temperature alteration
assemblages closest to the seafloor are dominated by carbonate species due to precipitation from shallowly circulating seawater (Fig. 16D). These chemical and mineralogical
changes in the ancient rock record can be further revealed by
mapping shifts in bulk rock oxygen and hydrogen isotope
compositions of the different zones (Green et al., 1983;
Taylor and South, 1985; Aggarwal and Longstaffe, 1987;
Cathles, 1993; Paradis et al., 1993). These stratified alteration zones can have a strike length of 5 to 50 km and a
thickness of 1 to 3 km in caldera settings (Fig. 15). The size
and areal morphology of the alteration system is a reflection
of the size and areal morphology of the VMS deposit cluster
(Fig. 12). The distribution of VMS deposits within this cluster depends on synvolcanic fault distribution relative to the
underlying intrusions (Eastoe et al., 1987; Gibson and
5370
Prehnitepumpellyite
Prehnitepumpellyite
Northing (UTM)
5360
ist
ch
Epidotens st
e
i
re
Actinolite
-g nsch
b
Su ree
G
Clinozoisite
5350
EpidoteActinolite
Absent
5340
t
nschis
Gree
te
li
o
ib
Amph
Chlorite-ClinozoisiteActinolite
PrehnitePumpellyite
610
620
630
640
660
650
Easting (UTM)
FIGURE 15. Comparison of regional greenschist-facies hydrothermal alteration in the Noranda Volcanic Complex with previously mapped metamorphic isograds (solid lines from Dimroth et al., 1983; Powell et al., 1993).
The distribution of greenschist-facies hydrothermal alteration (shaded) suggests that interpreted metamorphic zonation is at least partly a product of
early synvolcanic hydrothermal processes. Note that epidote and chlorite in
the pre-cauldron sequence are distinct from those of the mine sequence volcanic rocks, even though they are well within the epidote-actinolite subfacies and have been metamorphosed at the same pressure and temperature.
Modified from Hannington et al. (2003).
151
FIGURE 16. (A) High-temperature hydrothermally altered mafic volcaniclastic turbidite (left) overlain by a strongly silicified mafic debris flow 1200 m below
the Chisel-Lost-Ghost VMS horizon, Snow Lake. This is a regional-scale reaction zone overlain by a high-temperature zone of silica precipitation.
(B) Strongly silicified pillows with pipe vesicles infilled with actinolite, epidote, and magnetite, and interpillow hyaloclastite completely replaced by the same
assemblage. This alteration facies directly overlies the subvolcanic Mooshla intrusion, Bousquet VMS camp, Quebec. (C) Epidosite typical of the root zones
of VMS hydrothermal upflow zones in which high fluid/rock ratios have resulted in leaching of lithophile, chalcophile, and low field strength elements from
the strata. (D) Chloritoid-rich zone below the Mattabi deposit, Sturgeon Lake, where Fe-rich hydrothermal fluids overprinted a previously formed carbonaterich regional alteration zone.
Mafic, felsic, and bimodal siliciclastic volcanic assemblages tend to host volumetrically smaller mafic and/or felsic sill-dyke complexes, and generally contain Zn-Cu-Co
and Zn-Pb-Cu-Ag VMS deposits, respectively. More Cu-rich
deposits, such as Neves Corvo in the Iberian Pyrite Belt, may
also be present in settings proximal to discrete extrusive
complexes. The district-scale semiconformable hydrothermal systems consist of low-temperature mineral assemblages, with Mg-K smectite and K-feldspar alteration overlain by extensive units of low-temperature Fe-Si-Mn
deposits. Other types of iron formation in VMS districts are
interpreted to be products of plume fallout from high-temperature hydrothermal venting, or collection of hypersaline
brines within fault-controlled depressions on the seafloor
(Peter, 2003). Iron formation horizons can extend for tens of
kilometres, as in the Bathurst VMS camp in New Brunswick
(Peter and Goodfellow, 1996) (Fig. 18C), the Paleoproterozoic
Bergslagen district (Allen et al., 1996b), the DevonoMississippian Iberian Pyrite Belt in Spain and Portugal
(Carvalho et al., 1999), and the Mississippian Finlayson
Lake camp, Yukon (Peter, 2003). Mineralogical variations
within these regionally extensive iron formations, from
oxide through carbonate to sulphide, are indicative of proximity to more focused, higher temperature hydrothermal
vent complexes and also reflect stratification of the water
152
5363060
B
lt
ree
rC
nte
au
kF
654640
629780
km
Hu
4950
Lac Dufault
Granodiorite
Flavrian
Intrusion
9100
Granodiorite
Granodiorite, quartz monzonite
Gabbro, diorite
lt
u
Fa
km
Snow
Lake
VMS Deposits/Occurrences
km
Richard
Lake
9952'30"
VMS deposits
5452'35"
5341800
Mafic volcanics
Felsic volcanics
Th Syn
re cli
eh n
ou
se
tel
as
ch
au
e
B Powell
Intrusion
lt
k Fau
Cree
e
Horn
Subvolcanic Intrusions
Biedelman Bay subvolcanic
intrusive complex
Pluton
Sneath
Lake
Pluton
4745'
10015'00"
Bathurst
Morgan
Lake
5445'00"
Synkinematic intrusions
Synvolcanic intrusions
Turbidites
km
10
6530 '
66 37'30"
Volcaniclastic
4700'
Middle Ordovician - Lower Silurian
Carboniferous
Blueschist nappe
Gabbro
Granite
Sedimentary rocks
Fournier Group
Tetagouche Group
Upper Silurian
- Devonian
Sheephouse Brook
California Lake Group
Group
Granite
Cambrian
Lower
Ordovician
Gabbro
Miramichi Group
Sedimentary and
volcanic rocks
Late Neoproterozoic- Lower Cambrian
Silurian
Upsalquitch gabbro
VMS deposits D
Sedimentary and
volcanic rocks
Younging direction
Cu and Zn-rich VMS
deposits/occurrences
FIGURE 18. (A) Mine contact tuff exhalite horizon (between white lines)
that overlies the silicified andesites of the Waite Formation, Noranda,
Quebec. (B) Silicified basaltic andesite of the Upper Amulet Formation.,
Noranda, Quebec, as an example of pervasive silica precipitation that
occurred in mafic flows directly underlying tuffaceous exhalite units in
many Precambrian VMS camps. (C) Banded magnetite-chert Fe-formation
overlying the Austin Brook massive sulphide deposit, Bathurst camp (photo
by J.M. Peter).
FIGURE 19. (A) Example of a zoned sulphide chimney from the Endeavour Ridge vent field (I.R. Jonasson). (B) Typical textures from a massive sulphide
mound, Main vent field, Juan de Fuca Ridge. Mineralogical banding is due to incremental chimney growth, with ovoids representing worm casts. Fragment
cemented by later sulphide growth during mound collapse and subsequent invasion by hydrothermal fluid. (C) Clastic sandy sulphide ore from Cretaceous
Aarja deposit, Semail ophiolite, Oman. This common texture is created by repeated mound collapse resulting from anhydrite dissolution and recementing
with later sulphide (photo by I.R. Jonasson). (D) Pyrite-sphalerite clast as part of a proximal debris flow, Louvicourt, Val dOr. 15 cm metal grid for scale.
Former seafloor
100 metres
Alteration pipe
Po Cp
Sp
Gn
Py
Ba
155
FIGURE 21. (A) Finely bedded tuff partially replaced by massive pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite at the Ansil deposit, Noranda. 15 cm metal plates for scale.
(B) Cranston tuff unit with lit-par-lit replacement and in-filling by firstly by pyrite-sphalerite, followed by pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite, Ansil deposit, Noranda.
(C) Rhyolite clasts cemented by pyrite-sphalerite rich sulphide groundmass, Louvicourt deposit, Val dOr. 12 cm red magnet for scale. (D) Well developed
pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite vein stockwork zone with intense chlorite alteration of the rhyolite wallrocks, Ansil deposit, Noranda.
work zones, possibly with widespread and intense sericitequartz-pyrite alteration. The extensive sericite-rich alteration
system that underlies the Eskay Creek auriferous VMS
deposit may be a product of extensive subsurface boiling of
hydrothermal fluids, which resulted in the formation of lowtemperature (<200C) Sb-Hg-As-Pb sulphosalt-rich ore
lenses (Sherlock et al., 1999). More advanced argillic alteration may be produced by acidic magmatic volatiles, and this
alteration can lead to distinctive aluminosilicate-rich mineral
assemblages when metamorphosed to greenschist grade. In
the case of the LaRonde deposit, Quebec, classic moundtype Zn-Cu-Au massive sulphide lenses are associated with
extensive zones of metamorphosed argillic alteration containing pyrite-chalcopyrite-bornite-gold stockwork systems.
This may be the result of shallow subsurface boiling and separation of a volatile-rich fluid or focused input of oxidized
magmatic fluids (Dub et al., 2004).
In less extreme cases, distal, low-temperature hydrothermal alteration assemblages associated with VMS deposits
may be difficult to distinguish from regional greenschistfacies metamorphic mineral assemblages. When both proximal and regional semiconformable alteration zones are
affected by amphibolite-grade regional or contact metamorphism, the originally strongly hydrated alteration mineral
assemblages change into a coarse-grained quartz-phyllosilicate-aluminosilicate assemblages that are very distinct from
the surrounding unaltered strata (Fig. 23). It then becomes
156
possible to use the systematic variations in these coarsegrained metamorphic mineral assemblages as vectors
towards the core of the proximal alteration system or upsection towards the paleo-seafloor (Hodges and Manojlovic,
1993).
Genetic/Exploration Models
Exploration models for VMS systems have several common themes despite the large variety of submarine environments in which the deposits can form. The generation of a
VMS-hosting volcanic complex is a response to focused heat
flow caused by tectonic extension, mantle depressurization,
and the resultant formation of high-temperature mantle
melts, crustal partial melts, and common bimodal volcanic
succession. The large majority of VMS deposits in Canada
form in either bimodal mafic or bimodal felsic volcanic terranes dominated by basalt-basaltic andesite and rhyolite-rhyodacite. Prospective VMS-hosting arc terranes are characterized by bimodal volcanic successions that have a tholeiitic to
transitional tholeiitic-calc alkaline composition. The felsic
volcanics are characterized by low Zr/Y (<7) and low
(La/Yb)N (<6) ratios, with elevated high field strength element contents (Zr >200 ppm, Y >30 ppm, and elevated
LREE and HREE) typical of high-temperature, reduced
magmas derived from partially hydrated crust (Barrie et al.,
1993; Barrie, 1995; Lentz, 1998). The lower viscosities of
the high-temperature felsic magmas result in rapid ascent
3-5 km
3-5 km
Zone 3
(Phengite+
PRE-DEFORMA
TION
chlorite)
Sulphide Zone
Zone 3
(Fe-Mg-chlorite+
sericite)
Felsic Pyroclastics
(Nepisiguit Falls Fm.)
Zone 1
(Quartz+
Fe-chlorite)
Zone 4
Zone 3 (Phengite+
Mg-chlorite)
Zone 2
Fe-chlorite
sericite
(sulphide
stringer
zone)
FIGURE 22. A schematic composite section through a VMS alteration system in the Bathurst mining camp as an example of a VMS proximal alteration zone metamorphosed to greenschist-grade mineral assemblages. From
Goodfellow et al. (2003).
Chisel Rhyolite
LEGEND
Alteration Facies
Footwall Dacite
Chlorite-Staurolite
Biotite-Garnet
Siliceous Stringer
Sericite-Kyanite
Amphibolite Stringer
50 m
50 m
157
159
160
161