Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
We hereby declare that the work reported in this technical report has
been performed by us and this report has not been submitted or
published elsewhere for any other purpose. Except when due references
are made in the text of the report.
December 2016
Student ID:
13.01.03.015
13.01.03.016
13.01.03.017
13.01.03.018
13.01.03.019
13.01.03.020
13.01.03.021
13.01.03.022
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, we wish to convey my profound gratitude to the almighty
Allah for enabling us to complete this report successfully. We would
like to express our sincere appreciation and deepest gratitude to our
course teachers, Minhajul Islam Khan, Assistant Professor and Sadia
Mohsin,Lecturer of Department of Civil Engineering, Ahsanullah
University of Science And Technology. We are also grateful to our
group members for their continuous support throughout the period of
survey process. Finally, we want to express our gratefulness to our
parents and our family members who encourages us all the time.
ABSTRACT
Traffic volume studies are conducted to determine the number,
movements, and classifications of roadway vehicles at a given location.
These data can help identify critical flow time periods, determine the
influence of large vehicles or pedestrians on vehicular traffic flow, or
document traffic volume trends. In order to achieve some of these goals,
a Traffic Volume Survey had been conducted on the road Panthapath
intersection to Russel Square intersection and Russel Square intersection
to Panthapath intersection. Data collected from the survey has been
analyzed to get required information regarding Average Daily Traffic,
Flow Fluctuation, Vehicle Composition, and Directional Distribution
etc., which helps to make some educated guess on characteristics of the
existing condition of the road and to recommend some measures to
promote the level of service of the road.
Table of Contents
DECLARATION ......................................................................................................................................... 1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 2
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................... 3
CHAPTER 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 8
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 8
1.1 Main purposes of traffic survey: ................................................................................................. 8
1.2 Traffic Volume Study: ................................................................................................................. 9
CHAPTER 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 12
Literature Review .............................................................................................................................. 12
2.1 Definitions ............................................................................................................................... 12
CHAPTER 3 ............................................................................................................................................ 16
Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 16
3.1 Methods for volume survey ..................................................................................................... 16
3.2 Non-intrusive techniques ......................................................................................................... 18
3.3 Methods we have selected....................................................................................................... 19
3.4 Survey procedure ..................................................................................................................... 20
CHAPTER 4 ............................................................................................................................................ 23
Collected Data Analysis...................................................................................................................... 23
4.1 Data Collection histories .......................................................................................................... 23
4.2 Data Analysis............................................................................................................................ 24
4.5 Estimation of ADT .................................................................................................................... 26
4.6 Estimation of AADT .................................................................................................................. 27
4.7 Directional Distribution ............................................................................................................ 28
4.8 Flow Fluctuation Curve............................................................................................................. 30
4.9 Data Interpretation .................................................................................................................. 32
...................................................................................................................................................... 32
CHAPTER 5 ............................................................................................................................................ 33
Conclusion, Recommendations & Limitations .................................................................................... 33
5.1 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 33
4
5.2 Recommendation..................................................................................................................... 34
5.3 Limitations ............................................................................................................................... 34
5.4 Scope for Further Study ........................................................................................................... 35
References: ........................................................................................................................................... 36
List of Figure
Figure 3.1: Traffic Counting Point( Google Map).. 17
Figure 3.2: Traffic Counting Point( Google Earth). 17
Figure 3.3: Traffic Counting Point( Google Street view) 18
Figure 4.1: Directional Distribution 25
Figure 4.2: PCU Vs Time Curve.. 25
Figure 4.3: Flow Fluctuation Curve..... 27
Figure 4.5 Hourly Flow Fluctuation 2004 28
Figure 4.6 Hourly Flow Fluctuation 2004 28
Figure 4.7 Hourly Flow Fluctuation 2016 28
List of tables
Table 4.1 Vehicle count... 20
Table 4.2 Service flow rate determination. 22
Table 4.3 Level Of service... 23
Table 4.4 Directional Distribution... 25
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Transportation system is a dynamic system. Information about traffic must be regularly updated
to keep pace with ever-changing transportation system. Data must be collected and analyzed
systematically to get representative information.
Traffic engineers and planners need information about traffic. They need information to design
and manage road and traffic system. They use the information for planning and designing traffic
facilities, selecting geometric standards, economic analysis and determination of priorities. They
use this to justify warrant of traffic control devices such as signs, traffic signals, pavement
markings, school and pedestrian crossings. The also use this information to study the
effectiveness of introduced schemes, diagnosing given situations and finding appropriate
solutions, forecasting the effects of projected strategies, calibrating and validating traffic models.
Traffic surveys are the means of obtaining information about traffic. This is a systematic way of
collecting data to be used for various traffic engineering purposes.
design is based on repetition of wheel load on the pavement in entire design life. AADT is
needed with traffic growth rate to compute design wheel repetition. Geometric design is based on
peak hour volume to avoid congestion.
2.Intersection design including minimum turning path, channelization, flaring, traffic control
devices viz. traffic signs, markings, signals based on approach volume and turning proportions.
3.Pedestrian volume study is useful for designing side walk, pedestrian crossing etc.
10
3. Estimation of trends
4. Economic feasibility evaluation
5. Computation of accident rates- accidents/100M vehicle-miles
6.To establish relative importance of any route or road facility.
7.To decide the priority for improvement and expansion of a road and to allot the funds
accordingly.
8.To plan and design the existing and new facilities of traffic operations on the road.
9.To make analysis of traffic pattern and trends on the road.
10.To do structural design of pavements and geometrically design of roads by classified traffic
volume study.
11.To plan one-way street and other regulatory measures by volume distribution study.
12.To do design of road intersections, planning signal timings and channelisation by turning
movement study.
13.To do planning of side walk, cross walks and pedestrian signals by pedestrian volume study.
14.To do economic studies after estimating the highway user's revenue.
11
CHAPTER 2
Literature Review
2.1 Definitions
2.1.1 Volume/Flow: Volume is defined as the number of vehicles (or persons) that pass a
point or section of a lane or roadway on a transportation facility during a specified time period.
In traffic engineering studies there are many volumes such as daily volume, hourly volume, peak
hour volume. In addition volumes of a day or an hour can vary greatly, depending on the
different day of the week or different time period of a day.
2.1.2 Rate of Flow: The equivalent hourly rate at which vehicles pass over a given point or
a section of a lane or roadway during a given time interval, less than 1 hour, usually 15
minutes, is known as rate of flow.
2.1.3 Demand: In traffic volume studies the demand is not always measured but in many cases
it is required. Demand is the number of vehicles (or persons) desire to travel past a point
during a specified time period (usually an hour).
2.1.4 Capacity: Maximum rate at which vehicles can traverse a point or short segment
during a specified time period, is known as capacity.
2.1.5 Average Daily Traffic (ADT): ADT is defined as the average 24-hour volume at a
given
location for some period of time less than a year. It is expressed in terms veh/day.
2.1.6 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT): AADT is the average of 24-hour traffic
volume at a given location over a full year. It is expressed in terms of vpd.
2.1.7 Average Weekly Traffic (AWT): Average 24-hour traffic volume occurring on
weekdays for some period less than one year.
2.1.8 Annual Weekday Traffic (AAWT): AAWT is the average 24-hour traffic volume
occurring on weekdays over a full year, AAWT is computed by dividing the total
weekday volume for the whole year by 260.
The relationship between AAWT and AWT is analogous to that between AADT and
ADT. It should be mentioned here that these four volumes are often used in
transportation planning and shown in social or economic statistics.
Design Hourly Volume: It is the economic It is the economic hourly flow of future year,
which is used for designing geometric features roadway. It is chosen in such a way that
during the design period it should not be exceeded too often or too much..
12
2.1.13 Free flow: When drivers face no restriction in driving and can maintain their desired
speeds.
2.1.14 Forced flow: When lane changing opportunity decreases with increasing traffic volume
and drivers are forced to follow slow leaders.
2.1.15 Stable/ Steady flow: When demands are well below the roadway capacity and the
average rate of flow remains almost constant with time.
2.1.16 Unstable flow: When demand is at or near or exceeds the roadway capacity and the
average rate of flow fluctuates largely with time.
2.1.17 Peak flow: Flow at peak periods.
2.1.18 Off-peak flow: Flow at off-peak/lean periods.
2.1.19 Contra flow: For repair works; an arrangement on a large road by which traffic going in
both directions uses only one side of the road. For bus priority; a special arrangement on
one-way street by which only bus is allowed to go in opposite direction.
2.1.20 Tidal flow: When traffic flows in both direction exhibit unbalanced characteristics at
peak periods viz. morning rush at in-bound lanes due to commuter traffic and in the
evening the same is true for the out-bound lanes.
2.1.21 Daily variation factor (DF) --- is defined as ratio of AADT over yearly average
volume for particular day of week (Monday, Tuesday etc.)
2.1.22 Monthly variation factor (MF) --- is defined as ratio of AADT over ADT for
particular month of the year.
2.1.23 Hourly volumes and peak hour volume --- Hourly volumes are used to reflect
variation (fluctuation) of traffic volume in a day and peak hour volume is defined as the
volume in the single hour that has the highest hourly volume. Sometimes, peak hour is
also called rush hour.
13
2.1.24 Peak hour factor :Traffic engineers focus on the peak-hour traffic volume in
evaluating capacity and other parameters because it represents the most critical time period. And,
as any motorist who travels during the morning or evening rush hours knows, its the period
during which traffic volume is at its highest. The analysis of level of service is based on peak
rates of flow occurring within the peak hour because substantial short-term fluctuations typically
occur during an hour. Common practice is to use a peak 15-minute rate of flow. Flow rates are
usually expressed in vehicles per hour, not vehicles per 15 minutes. The relationship between the
peak 15-minute flow rate and the full hourly volume is given by the peak-hour factor (PHF) as
shown in the following equation:
PHF = ( Hourly Volume/Peak RATE of Flow within the hour)
2.1.27 VMT (Vehicle Miles Traveled) or VKT (Vehicle Kilometers Traveled) --another
parameter to estimate product of volume and average travel length for a trip. This
element is often used as an important statistics to measure intensity of vehicles using
roadways.
2.1.28 PCU (or PCE) --- Passenger Car Unit (Passenger Car Equivalent) is defined as the
number of passenger cars displaced by one truck, bus, or RV (recreational vehicle) in
a given traffic stream. In order to reflect the different impact or intensity on the
roadway due to the different vehicles in terms of size, operating characteristics,
passenger car unit (passenger car equivalent) is applied in the estimation of traffic
volume.
1. More roadway space for heavy vehicles than passenger car
2. Heavy vehicles include truck, buses and recreational vehicle
3. The more the grade, the higher the PCE values
14
4. The higher the percent of heavy vehicles, the less the PCE values. The directional split of traffic
during the peak or design hour, commonly expressed as percent in the peak and off-peak flow directions.
15
CHAPTER 3
Methodology
3.1 Methods for volume survey:
There are two major methods of counting vehicle for volume survey. They are1. Manual Counting Method
2. Automatic counting method.
3.1.1.1 Direct Method: Data is counted by using hand tally and manual counters/enumerators.
Advantages: By this method traffic volume as well as vehicle classification and turning
Error is common especially when volume is high. Count cannot be cross checked. Count cannot
be done in bad weather.
3.1.1.2 Indirect Method: In this method, data is collected using video camera. Video is
captured for long time and data is collected later by rewinding.
Advantages: Besides
Disadvantages: A suitable elevated place is required for filming operation. Data cannot be used
immediately after collection. Data must be manually transcript of recorded film. This process is
time consuming and tedious. Because of limitation of capacity of film, it is not suitable for long
16
duration counts. Quality of video recorded on film is dependent on intensity of light and this
method is not suitable in overcast days.
17
3.1.2.3 Piezoelectric sensors: the sensors are placed in a groove along roadway surface of the
lane(s) monitored. The principle is to convert mechanical energy into electrical energy. Indeed,
mechanical deformation of the piezoelectric material modifies the surface charge density of the
material so that a potential difference appears between the electrodes. The amplitude and
frequency of the signal is directly proportional to the degree of deformation. This system can be
used to measure weight and speed.
3.1.2.4 Magnetic loops: it is the most conventional technology used to collect traffic data. The
loops are embedded in roadways in a square formation that generates a magnetic field. The
information is then transmitted to a counting device placed on the side of the road. This has a
generally short life expectancy because it can be damaged by heavy vehicles, but is not affected
by bad weather conditions. This technology has been widely deployed in Europe (and elsewhere)
over the last decades. However, the implementation and maintenance costs can be expensive.
Advantages: This method is suitable for long duration or continuous count. It is used as
permanent counting station. It does not need manpower and is free from human error. Data is
obtained in usable format. It is less expensive as manpower is not needed. Count is not affected
by bad weather condition.
Disadvantages: It requires strict lane discipline. Non motorized vehicles are hard to detect by
this method. Detailed classification of vehicle is not possible. Accuracy is less than manual
method. Installation cost is high.
3.2.1 Passive and active infra-red: the presence, speed and type of vehicles are detected
based on the infrared energy radiating from the detection area. The main drawbacks are the
performance during bad weather, and limited lane coverage.
3.2.2 Passive magnetic: magnetic sensors are fixed under or on top of the roadbed. They count
the number of vehicles, their type and speed. However, in operating conditions the sensors have
difficulty differentiating between closely spaced vehicles.
3.2.3 Microwave radar: this technology can detect moving vehicles and speed (Doppler
radar). It records count data, speed and simple vehicle classification and is not affected by
weather conditions.
18
3.2.4 Ultrasonic and passive acoustic: these devices emit sound waves to detect vehicles by
measuring the time for the signal to return to the device. The ultrasonic sensors are placed over
the lane and can be affected by temperature or bad weather. The passive acoustic devices are
placed alongside the road and can collect vehicle counts, speed and classification data. They can
also be affected by bad weather conditions (e.g. low temperatures, snow).
3.2.5 Video image detection: video cameras record vehicle numbers, type and speed by
means of different video techniques e.g. trip line and tracking. The system can be sensitive to
meteorological conditions.
3.3.1 Reasons :
1.Unavailablity of instruments
2.Simplest among all study
19
21
22
CHAPTER 4
Collected Data Analysis
4.1 Data Collection histories
Number
98
Car
132
3 Wheeler
55
Bus
Motorcycle
44
NMT
93
3
23
23%
Jeeo,Micro,Taxi
Car
3 Wheeler
10%
Bus
13%
31%
Motorcycle
NMT
1%
Number Of Vehicle
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Types of Vehicle
24
Number
PCU
Total Vehicle (PCU) Service Flow
per
(11.00am to11.20am) per
Vehicle
Hour(PCU/hr)
98
1.5
147
441
Car
132
132
27.5
396
3 Wheeler
55
.5
Bus
12
36
Motorcycle
44
0.1
4.4
13.2
NMT
93
0.5
46.5
139.5
1.5
4.5
13.5
Total=373.9
Total= 1121.7
Utility& other
82.5
25
A
B
C
D
E
F
6001
700
900
1200
1400
>1400
According to this table the level of service of Mirpur Road- Panthapath intersection was
D at 10:00 am-11:00 pm at the day of survey (Tuesday).
Estimated 24 hour volume for Thursday (Panthapath to Russel Square), using HEF
= (1182 x 18.80 + 1121.7 x 17.11 + 888.47 x 18.52)/3
= 19289.45PCU
= 19290PCU
26
From 24 hour volume for Thursday estimated volume for the week using DEF ,
Total 7 days volume
= 19290x 7.012
=135261.48 PCU = 135262 PCU
Average 24 hours volume (on average daily traffic, ADT)
= 135262/7 PCU/day
=19323.14 PCU/day
= 19324PCU/day (Panthapath to Russel Square) (Group-1,2,3)
Now ADT:
Group 1,2,3 (Panthapath to Russel Square) = 19324 PCU/day
Group 4,5,6 (Russel Square to Panthapath) = 18204 PCU/day
Since the data were collected in December. But monthly expansion factor used for January
1.756.
27
Time
PCU/Hr
Panthopath to
Russel Square
9AM-10AM
1182
10AM-11AM
1121.7
11AM-12AM
888.48
9AM-10AM
945.3
Russel Square to
Panthopath
10AM-11AM
1053.3
11AM-12AM
1010.1
Average
PCU/Hr
Directional
Distribution (%)
1065
51.5
1003
48.5
28
Directional Distribution
49%
Panthopath to Russel
Square
51%
Russel Square to
Panthopath
1200
1000
800
600
East to West
400
West to East
200
0
0
9.00 am
to
10.00 am
10.00 am
to
11.00 am
11.00
am
to
12.00 pm
Time
29
According to directional distribution most of the vehicle travel towards Russell Square,
as this road leads to the city center and the survey was made in the work going phase of
the day, so directional distribution was justified.
30
Time
W-E Flow
Rate
(PCU/hr)
9.00 am to
10.00am
1182
1010.1
10.00am to
11.00am
1121.7
1053.3
11.00am to
12.00am
884.48
945.3
E-W ADT
W-E ADT
19324
18204
E-W(%ADT)
W-E
(%ADT)
6.12
5.55
5.81
5.79
4.58
5.19
% ADT
5
4
3
East to West
West to East
1
0
0
9.00 am
to
10.00 am
10.00 am
to
11.00 am
11.00 am
to
12.00 pm
Time
Figure 4.3: Flow Fluctuation Curve
31
32
CHAPTER 5
Conclusion, Recommendations & Limitations
5.1 Conclusion:
5.1.1 Discussion on Vehicle composition:
1. Lights vehicle (car) occupied 31% of total vehicle.
2. Percentage of NMV (non motorized vehicle) is relatively moderate (21%).
3. Percentage of public transport (bus) is 1%. Which is very low
4. Percentage of utility vehicle is 10%.
5.1.3 Directional distribution: Directional distribution was found nearly equal (51.5%) in the
direction of E-W and (48.5%) in the direction W-E.
Approximately 51.5 percent of traffic flow was towards Russell Square which indicates
tidal flow towards north-west. It was morning rush hour. So flow was higher towards the
city center. 48.5 percent of traffic was flowing towards south-east. If another vehicle count
was done in evening rush hour, opposite scenario might be seen.
5.1.4 Discussion on Flow fluctuation cure: From the flow fluctuation curve it is seen that
the vehicle movement is nearly uniform in that road. % of ADT is higher for Panthapath to
Russell Square direction at 10.00 AM-11.00 PM
5.2 Recommendation:
1. NMV should not be allowed.
2. Amount of public transport should be increased.
3. To increase the LOS necessary steps should be taken to prevent the entrance of NMV, stop
road side parking, prevent pedestrian crossing, and introduce optimum traffic signal system.
4. This road
5.3 Limitations:
1. Flow rate was used instead of traffic volume.
2. instead of whole day traffic count short count was taken (20min).
3. Now a days automatic counting method based on CCTV/Video image processing is reliable
and popular. But due to resource constraint it was not possible.
4. Limited and unskilled enumerators.
5. Insolent surveyors.
6. Expansion factors used for the calculation of ADT were developed for a rural primary road.
7. We monthly expansion factor used for January instead of December
34
35
References:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_count
2. https://www.academia.edu/8325946/Traffic_volume_studies_on_a_collector_road
3. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/203670/tra
ffic-signs-manual-chapter-08-part-02.pdf
4. https://www.academia.edu/9590913/TRAFFIC_VOLUME_STUDY_of_Bangladesh
5. http://teacher.buet.ac.bd/cfc/CE452/12_Volume study_print6.pd
6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconnaissance
36