Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ART
EVEN AFTER
ADORNO'S C R I T I C A L THEORY OF ART,
AUSCHWITZ:
RELIGION ANI'
IDEOLOGY
Cheryl Nafziger-Leis
@ Copyright
191
National Library
of Canada
Bibliothque nationale
du Canada
Acquisitions and
Bibliographic Senrices
Acquisitions et
seMces bibliographiques
canada
ABSTRACT
statement, for it became apparent to him that art was the last
refuge of hope in a world where suffering had not corne to an end.
This study is, in general, an investigation of art as that voice
of suffering. More specifically, this is an examination of the
nature of the relationships between art, ideology, and religion,
in the context of the later twentieth century Western Christian
tradition. Key components of this enquiry are an ideology
critique of religion, as well as an ideology critique of the
manipulation of art by religious institutions for the purposes of
religion. The argument guiding this critique is that to
manipulate works of art in this way is to deny art its autonomy.
The critical theory of the Frankfurt School, especially as
developed by Adorno, provides the critical tools for this
investigation. The groundwork is laid by establishing what is
meant by both the terms ideology and religion, and what it means
to carry out such an investigation within the academic study of
religion. As well, examples rom the art of theatre re given in
order to concretize the investigation. In the end the question
becomes: if, as members of the Frankfurt School maintain,
religion has abdicated its prophetic role in its accommodation to
the world around it, what would it mean to argue that religious
art might still be possible?
iii
Acknowledgements
basis for it. Mary loved teaching and loved what she was
teaching. For herpstudents, ~aq-breathedlife into philosophy,
literature, and foreign languages. 1 thank Mary for confirming
for me the importance of asking questions.
1 was also privileged to study with Prof. Horst Schwebel of
the University of Marburg, Germany. Ten years prior to writing
this thesis 1 became aware of an entirely different approach to
the study of art and religion at the Marburg Institute. 1
greatly appreciate that Prof. Schwebel granted permission for me
to carry out research at the Institute in 1 9 9 5 . It was
tremendous to be able to discuss with him my project and to gain
insights into Adorno rom someone who had studied with himMy research was funded through several sources, for al1 of
which 1 am extremely grateful: Ontario Graduate Scholarship
program, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of
canada, University of Toronto Open Fellowship program, and the
University of Toronto Alumni Association Travel Grant program.
Although using a computer has in many ways made the process
of writing a thesis much easier, it has also been a source of
numerous headaches. One is fortunate when one can turn to
experts in one's moments of techno-trauma; 1 thank Cory Albrecht,
Barry Bishop, Tom MacKay, and Steve Pfisterer. As well, I thank
John Kendall for the incredibly generous offer to print this
document on his office laser printer.
And what is life without family and friends? For the many
great discussions, mutual pep talks, and secret revelations over
lunch at Innes College (and for the navy kneesocks!), 1 thank my
friend and fellow-Centre student, Michele Murray. For showing me
that one could actually finish a PhD in a reasonable amount of
time and for lending me a shoulder to cry on now and then, 1
thank my friend, Marlene Epp. 1 would also like to thank my
Mother-in-law, Arvilla Leis, for taking an interest in what 1
have been doing and for the many discussions on feminist
interpretations of the world. 1 have appreciated her wit and her
honesty. And 1 have appreciated the encouragement 1 have felt
rom my parents, Rae and Ruth Nafziger. My Mother was not
allowed to go to High School and my Father was not allcwed to go
to University; the education of their o m kids was a high
priority for them. 1 learned only recently that when 1 was quite
young my Mother said to a friend that if it's at al1 in her
power, her "children are going to high school, they're going to
go as far as they can go." Sub-consciously 1 understood this. I
thank them for their many expressions of support.
And most irnportantly, 1 thank my husband, David Leis. He
kept my spirits up, kept my confidence up, and kept me to my
schedule. David was a source of advice regarding acadernic cum
political sensitivities. He argued with me over semantics,
debated with me over philosophical issues, and challenged me on
my interpretation of texts and events. He stabilized my
flounderings and dispelled my disenchantments. I thank him for
his friendship. 1 thank him for his love.
'
E.B. A s h t o n
.................................................
1 . Outline of this study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INTRODUCTION
Page
7
15
INVESTIGATION
1 . Working Definitions
..................................
22
22
33
34
48
52
55
56
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
I . Ideology ............................................
69
i . Religion as ideology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
II . Religion as Concept and Reality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 87
i . Methodology for analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
ii . Religion as a social institution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
i i i . Methodological presuppositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 4
iv . General implications for
religionand a r t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
III . Adorno's Response to Religion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
i . Dialectic of Enlightenment:
Wyth to Enlightenment and back . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
ii . Micrological survival:
Theology after the Enlightenment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
iii . "Reason and Revelation":
Adorno's response to a religious revival . . . . . . 132
iv . Negative knowledge:
yearning for the possibility of hope . . . . . . . . . . 141
........
art and religion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
II
III
153
159
Negative Dialectics:
"thinking the unconditionedn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
i . The negative dialectic of art:
introductory remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
..................
1 . Art: Subversive or Submissive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i . Art of the "culture industryn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ii . Irony of capitalism:
fine line of art's autonomy and exchange . . . . . .
iii . Politically committed art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
iv . Spotlighting alternatives:
negation neutralized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
v . The theatre of Brecht . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CEiAPTER 4
II
.ART
Adornian Response to
Contemporary Feminist Theatre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i . Feminist theatre:
subverting the male tradition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ii . Trends in feminist theatre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
iii . Adorno's Aesthetic Theory and
feminist theatre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
201
213
227
231
233
235
238
242
255
259
276
283
-An
296
298
304
313
CHAPTER
I
5 .ART
..............
325
329
333
341
367
370
379
386
391
CONCLUSION
I
.....
407
...................................................
420
Art:
"
II
. . .the last
Artafter Auschwitz
................................
437
Yf
Art's
- which
forms -
and
their relationship
to
Theodor W.
Adorno,
'Theses Upon A r t
..
idea was kept alive that there are other norms" besides those of
c
structures of
power
and
authority
has
at many
points
Max H o r k h e i m e r , " T h o u g h t s
trans. Matthew
Continuum, 1 9 8 9 ) , 1 2 9 .
Se7ected Essays,
on
Re1 ig i o n ,
"
C r i t ica 7 Theory:
(New Y o r k :
J . O'Connel 1 e t a l
that art
resolves with
facile hope
Nor is it m y
the struggles
and
..
.. .
it, f
also maintain
that
within
established
church
and
monolithic. Hope that the spell can be broken lies with the hope
that it is still possible for human beings to maintain the capacity
to think critically, thereby establishing a foothold in the cracks
quo.
As
a member of the
I b i d . , 317.
" Whi le t h e s t a t e m e n t s made may p r o v e t r u e f o r t h e C h r i s t i a n
c h u r c h a r o u n d t h e w o r l d and i n o t h e r p e r i o d s o f h i s t o r y , a s well as
f o r o t h e r re1i g i o u s t r a d i t i o n s , these t o p i c s w i I l n o t fa1 l w i t h i n
t h e scope o f t h i s s t u d y .
The
critical theory of the Frankfurt School was not a unity. but rather
involved fundamental differences in the approaches of the various
thinkers; nevertheless, it is impossible not to make reference to
others in the Frankfurt School when dealing with the thought of
Adorno.
Although the Frankfurt School responded to art in the early to
mid
Nevertheless. 1
will argue that in his own aesthetic theory, Adorno builds a case
'*
critique which
longs
for a
is
religionwi6 is
in
its
relationhip
to
truth.li
If,
as
he
l 3 Once a g a i n ,
t h e term " r e l i g i o n "
i s a key term t o m y
i n v e s t i g a t i o n . I n l i g h t o f t h e p l e t h o r a of understandings o f t h i s
terrn, i n C h a p t e r 1 I wi11 o f f e r a w o r k i n g d e f i n i t i o n and an
e x t e n s i v e d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e c u r r e n t d e b a t e s u r r o u n d i n g t h i s term,
as w e l l as t h e s t u d y o f r e l i g i o n , i t s e l f .
j 4 Marsha H e w i t t ,
Criiica7 Theory of R e I i g i o n :
A n a 7 y s i s ( M i nneapol is : F o r t r e s s P r e s s , 1995), 33.
j5
Ibid.
j6
Adorno,
Feminist
j 7 H o r k h e i m e r addresses t h e i s s u e of
"what i s t r u t h , " as w e l l
as t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p o f t r u t h t~ r e l i g i o n i n h i s essay, "On t h e
Problem o f T r u t h . "
I n contrast t o t h e notion o f a " f i n a l truth,I1
as p r o p o s e d b y i d e a l i s m , H o r k h e i m e r speaks o f t r u t h f r o m t h e
p e r s p e c t i v e o f m a t e r i a l i sm, whi c h recogni zes t r u t h as h i s t o r i c a l l y
medi a t e d . He s t a t e s : " o n l y t h a t t h e o r y i s t r u e w h i c h can g r a s p t h e
h i s t o r i c a l p r o c e s s s o d e e p l y t h a t it is p o s s i b l e t o d e v e l o p f r o m it
t h e c l o s e s t a p p r o x i m a t i o n t o t h e s t r u c t u r e and t e n d e n c y o f s o c i a l
l i f e i n t h e v a r i o u s spheres o f c u l t u r e . " [Max Horkheimer, "On t h e
P r o b l em o f T r u t h , " in The Essentia 7 F r a n k f u r t Schoo 7 R e a d e r , eds. ,
A r a t o and G e b h a r d t , 423.1
W i t h r e g a r d s t o t r u t h and r e l i g i o n ,
Horkheimer speaks o f how t h e b a s i c c o n c e p t s o f C h r i s t i a n i t y have
been " c o n t r a d i c t e d in r e a l it y w whi 7 e a t t h e same t i me becomi ng more
and more i n t e r n a l ized by t h e " b o u r g e o i s mental it y . "
"But,
he
s t a t e s , " t h e g r o s s c o n t r a d i c t i o n t h a t e x i s t e d was r e a l 1 y u n d e r s t o o d
w i t h i n t h e b o u r g e o i s i e o n l y by t h e r e l i g i o u s o u t s i d e r s such as
And
write poems. tr 19
The
l9 Adorno, N e g a t i v e D i a 7ectics. 3 6 2 .
I n an e a r l i e r work, P r i s m s , Adorno w r o t e : "To w r i t e p o e t r y
a f t e r A u s c h w i t z i s barbarie. "
[ A d o r n o , P r i s m s , t r a n s . Samuel and
S h i e r r y Weber (Cambridge, Mass. : M I T P r e s s , 1981, s i x t h p r i n t i ng,
l99Z), 34. j
However, he 1a t e r came t o t h e c o n c l u s i o n t h a t s i nce
s u f f e r i n g has c o n t i n u e d , so has t h e need t o g i v e i t v o i c e i n a r t .
The d i s c u s s i o n among Y a t e s e t al. ( n o t e d i n f o o t n o t e #6
above) has been f a i r l y c o n s i s t e n t l y 7 i m i t e d t o t h e w r i t i ngs o f P a u l
T i 11 ich, N i ch01as W o l t e r s t o r f f , Hans U r s von B a l t h a s a r , and Jacques
M a r i t a i n.
is viewed
as
tool available
to be
used
by
church
- as defined
The
t h e A e s t h e t i c Theory.
discussions of
reality.
This
. . .for
the
An ideology
1 begin with
"power and ideology are not mere sidetracks for the distraction of
sociologists, but rather phenomena which lie at the heart of
[philosophical] concerns.w25
of
repressive
religion. u26
and
ernancipatory
impulses
which
structures
I b i d . , 75.
25 Thompson,
S t u d i e i n the T h e o r y o f I d e o l o g y , 7 4 .
critical thinkers; as I
1 will
1 believe
of drama will
be
will examine
and
concepts to grasp the truth of the whole which they claim they
grasp, it is daunting to propose one will b e able to produce a
smooth, seamless written project - a whole - on the thought of
Adorno.
1f ,
ORIENTING T
INVESTIGATION
. .. ." 2 9
1. Working Definitions
*'
Clifford
Interpretat
Inc.,
1973), 90.
As
a result, the
that for the devotee the concept of a god or divine being may be
inherent in the system of symbols which makes the general order of
existence meaningful for the devotee.
In my investigation, 1
include their
30 I b i d .
cultural forms.
In thi investigation.
this type of
transcendent beingfs)/god(s).
religion as
a system
of culturally postulated
categories, a
32 Marsha A . H e w i t t ,
S t u d y o f Religion," 8 .
"Ideology
critique,
Ferninisrn and
the
33 T h e r e e x i s t , f o r example, a p r o f e s s i o n a l s o c i e t y c a l l e d :
The S o c i e t y f o r the S c i e n t i f i c S t u d y o f R e 1 i g i o n , o r t h e SSSR.
conceptual
schemes, world
views,
symbolic
representations,
debate
originated
when
During
the
controversy, the faith was indeed very much at stake, although not
in the
the
on the truth of the Christian religion, but rather because the very
need to examine the Faith irnplied doubt . n 3 6
Christian theologians
34 A s one s c h o l a r w r i t e s : " T h e r e i s n o t h i n g r e l i g i o u s a b o u t
' r e l i g i ~ n ' . ' ~[Sam G i l l , "The Acadernic S t u d y o f R e l i g i o n , " Journa7
o f t h e American Academy o f R e 7 i g i o n L X I I . 4 ( W i n t e r l994), 965.1
35 Hans H .
Penner,
" H o l i s t i c Analysis:
Conjectures and
R e f u t a t i o n s , " Journa7 o f t h e American Academy o f Re7 i g i o n L X 1 1 . 4
(Wi n t e r l 9 9 4 ) , 991.
36 Donald Wiebe, The I r o n y of Theo7ogy and the N a t u r e o f
Re7 i g i o u s Thought ( M o n t r e a l and K i n g s t o n : McGi 11 -Queen ' s U n i v e r s i t y
P r e s s , 1991), 2 0 7 .
origins
of
transcendent b e i n g .
religion.
including
the
existence
of
the
in order to
this century that higher education began to slip away from the
37 I b i d . , 1 2 .
religion as a legitimate academic f i e l d came as late as m i d century. Significant for the basic rationale for the establishment
of American university departments of religion was the 1964 Schempp
case.
The U . S .
First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, but that " ' t h e teaching
about religion, as distinguished f rom the teaching o f religion, in
t h e public schools' was lawful under the Amendment-"39
It was this
"
in
Canada.O'
proselyt izing .
But
when
the
many
private,
With the
Ibid.,
57.
is
will set the agenda and thus control the study of religion: "the
scholar-scientist or
the
33
42 C h a r l e s
P.
Anderson,
Guide t o R e 7 i g i o u s Studies in
Canada/Guide des Sciences Re 7 i g i e u s e s au Canada ( N . p . : C o r p o r a t i on
f o r t h e P u b l i c a t i o n o f Academic
1972), c i t e d i n I b i d . , 8.
Studies
i n Re1igion
i n Canada,
''
I b i d . , 401.
Bruce A l t o n ,
lfMethod and R e d u c t i o n i n t h e study of
r e l i g i o n , " Studies i n ReTigion/Sciences Religieuses 15.2 ( S p r i n g
1986), 1 5 4 .
most vocal
In outright opposition
46 I b i d .
47 Suan T h i t1 e t h w a i te, "Settl ed Issues and Negl ected
Q u e s t i o n s : How i s Re1 i g i o n to B e S t u d i e d ? " Journa 7 o f t h e American
Academy o f Re7 igion L X 1 1 . 4 ( W i n t e r l994), 1037.
48 C h a r l e s D a v i s , ' l - W h e r e i n There Is No E c s t a s y ,
R e 7 i g i o n / S c i e n c e s R e 7 i g i e u s e s 1 3 . 4 (l984), 3 9 4 .
49 I b i d .
"'
Studies in
systerns by which
such
apologetics . v 5 3
position in relation to t h e i r
l u
394.
...
[ I b i d . , 393.1
.It
(La
Salle,
Wiebe
who
laments
the
"longstanding
McCutcheon urges us
controversyw of
this
debate.
religion
which
"can be
of
decisive
society whose members are united by the fact that they think
in the same way in regard to the sacred world and its
relations with the profane world, and b y the f a c t that they
translate these y m o n ideas into common practices, is what is
called a church.
255, n . 15.
61 Rudol p h ,
74.
62 Emi l e D u r k h e i m , The Elementary Forms o f t h e Religious L i f e
(London: A l l e n and U n w i n , 1957; c. 1915), 59.
common
practices.
The
officia1
or
established
The question that will arise in our discussion of the church, will
be whether the institution does in fact exist in service to the
community of faith, or for the sake of its own existence.
iii. Theology
Smart further
theologian engaged
community -
Theologians
dogma and their theology is "governed by the values and aims of the
religious community -
n65
64 N i n i a n S m a r t ,
M a c m i l l a n , 1973), 1 4 8 .
The
Phenornenon
of
Rdigion
(New
York:
be
made
to
the
Christian
church
whose
theological
As
to
examine the
"religious ideas... ,
moral
t168
" L i b e r a t i on
Theol ogy
and
the
Emanci p a t i on
of
therefore.
live up
to Alton's
sciences: no
especially
in
the
unquestioned
existence
of
or
unquestionable
transcendent
beliefs,
reality. 69
VI
. . .should be undertaken as
I
contend that
if
theology is
to
be
"10
undertaken as such a
'' I b i d . ,
"
154.
of t h e Academic
1175.
Brown s t a t e s t h a t " q u i t e p o i n t e d l y ,
.much o f t h e o p p o s i t i o n
to t h e o l o g y among r e l ig i o u s s t u d i e s s c h o l a r s i s s i r n p l y p r e j u d i c i a l ,
t h e i r own i n s t i n c t i v e resi s t a n c e t o o7d in t e l l e c t u a l s h a c k l e s t h a t ,
d e s p i t e t h e i r p r o t e s t a t i o n s , s t i 11 r e s t r a i n t h e r n . " [ I b i d . , 1178. ]
S h a c k l e s and a l l , 1 m a i n t a i n t h a t t h e o l o g y and t h e s t u d y of
r e l i g i o n a r e two d i f f e r e n t e n t e r p r i s e s : t h e f o r m e r , as t h e t a s k of
t h e t h e o l o g i a n w i t h i n a r e l i g i o u s comrnuni t y , is r e s p o n s i b l e t o t h a t
..
In other
cornmuni t y .
academy .
'*
W i ebe,
T h e I r o n y o f TheoTogy, 7.
73 I b i d . , 1 1 .
To want
Accordingly
Wiebe,
The I r o n y o f
TheoTogy, 10.
39
1 agree with Wiebe's basis for this argument, which is: "1 do not
incommensurate.
puts
forth
in his
book
to
the
While the
has made
76 I b i d . , 8 5 , n . 1 .
77 I b i d . , 175.
W i e b e ' s need t o d i s t i n g u i s h d i f f e r e n t t y p e s o f t h e o l o g y ( c o n f e s s i o n a l ) t h e 0 1 ogy as opposed t o (academi c ) t h e 0 1 ogy
i 1l u s t r a t e s t h e d i f f i c u l t y
in h e r e n t i n h i s a r g u m e n t .
The
d i f f i c u l t y and c o n f u s i o n i s compounded w i t h h i s i n s i s t e n c e on
theology w i t h ("theologyw) versus theology w i t h o u t ( t h e o l o g y ) scare
quotes.
I m a i n t a i n t h a t t h e o l o g y i s t h e o l o g y is t h e o l o g y ;
o t h e r w i s e i t i s t h e acadernic s t u d y o f r e l i g i o n o f w h i c h we speak.
Wiebe, "The
r e l i g i o n , " 421.
79 Wiebe,
fai lure
of
nerve
in
The I r o n y o f T h e o l o g y , 1 2 .
the
academic
study
of
position.
In this sense, ... theology (philosophical,
theoretical, or scientific), as 'the rational of God or the
gods' countenances the possibility of reductipism, although
it does not, quite obviously, necessitate it.
Although the intellectual honesty of theology may be ironically
detrimental to the faith and lead one into a scientific inquiry.
the fact that theology is governed by the religious community,
itself puts a lirnit on that intellectual honesty. Because 1 do not
agree that
theology
by
its very
nature can
"abandon[] any
cal1
such
an
exercise
as
described
above
What
In fact, in
on his
insistence that
"theologyn
is
rational and
80 Wiebe, "The
religion, " 4 2 1 .
fai l u r e o f
nerve
in
the
academic
tudy o f
inclride
For
Feminist
methodology
"in every
~ros
case,
...
*'
argued
for, Gross
insists on
"method of
R i t a G r o s s , Buddhisrn A f t e r P a t r i a r c h y : A F e r n i n i t H i s t o r y ,
Ana I y s i s ,
and Reconstruction o f Buddhism ( A l bany , NY: S t a t e
U n i v e r s i t y o f New Y o r k P r e s s , 1 9 9 3 ) , 3 .
I would 1 i k e t o express appreciation to Marsha H e w i tt, who
p o i n t e d me i n t h e d i r e c t i o n o f t h i s s t u d y by G r o s s .
82 I b i d . ,
5.
Gross
As she explains it ,
one approach is incomplete without the other; while "the tools and
the insights of the outsider provide much that is absolutely
essential to the study of religion. . . .The perspective of the
insider provides a level of understanding not otherwise available
that provides warmth and intimacy - a kind of depth not available
without direct experience of the phenomenon being studied.,,87
Although she knows she will be called a ltcrypto-theologianl'
by
sorne scholars - "clearly an assessment lower than 'misguided,' or
'feeble-minded,"'*' - G r o s maintains her position that in the long
83 I b i d .
Ibid.
85 I b i d . , 3 0 5 .
86 I b i d . , 5 .
j7
I b i d . , 316.
'*
I b i d . , 307-8
~ r o s lament
for al1 concerned * Gross has abandoned her "allegiance to one side
or the other of this division within religious studies." and
proposes instead to combine the two approa~he.~'Basic to Gross'
methodology then is what some scholars, like Marsha Hewitt, would
term a "conflation of the study of theology, the religious point of
view and the study of religion. ,92
disregards and ignores the argument that Hewitt, Wiebe and other
scholars have set up that " [ t Jheology. the religious point of view
and the study of religion are not to [sic] the same thing; [ f o r ]
''
I b i d . , 306.
Ibid.,
309.
91 I b i d .
92 H e w i t t ,
R e l i g i o n , " 17.
Ydeology
Critique,
Feminism
and
the
Study o f
93 I b i d .
D i s t i n g u i s h i n g between t h e s t u d y o f r e l i g i o n frorn a r e l i g i o u s
p o i n t o f view and an academic p o i n t o f v i e w i s c r i t i c a l f o r
c a r r y i ng o u t an id e o l o g i cal c r i t i q u e o f r e l ig i on, a c c o r d i ng t o
H e w i t t , who suggests t h a t " t h e study o f r e l i g i o n frorn a r e l i g i o u s
p o i n t o f view r e s u l t s i n t h e m e t h o d o l o g i c a l i n s t a n t i a t i o n o f
ideology i n t h e academic process, t h e r e b y undermi n i n g t h e c r i t i c a l
p o t e n t i a l o f ideology c r i t i q u e . " [ I b i d . ]
case at all.
opinion, one
"cannot otherwise
In
function as
For
Wiebe. on the
other hand. would have us adopt two definitions of theology distinguished from one another merely via scare quotes.
94 G r o s s ,
95 I b i d .
Buddhisrn A f t e r Patriarchy, 31 7.
Wiebe's
If one's usage
explained and adhered to, one could find that one's words could be
appropriated by those with whom one disagrees, one's words could be
made to say precisely what one does not want them to say.
And
scholars of religion can easily Say: "See, even Wiebe agrees that
theology is a scientific enterprise so to undertake one's study of
religion as a theologian fits within the enterprise of the academic
study of religion. " Wiebe rnay argue that their misunderstanding of
h i s terrninology is not his problem; indeed, however, it fuels the
even
of
ideology, is
a necessary and
indeed
institutions, which
are
defined
as
"
the
regularized
97 S m a r t ,
The Phenornenon o f R e l i g i o n , 1 4 8 .
Also significant to
may
be described
is
Relations of
domination
are
as
legitimate
"rational,
via
traditional,
or
concealed, denied
or
'blocked'
99 Thompson,
S t u d i e s i n t h e Theory o f I d e o l o g y ,
'O0
I b i d . , 130.
'O1
Ibi d .
'O2
Ibid.,
131.
129.
church are administratively run and guided by the values and aims
of the church as an officially organized institution. Because the
social totality of the church is not, in my view. a coherent unity
- for there are evidences of prophetic voices who
legitimate the s t a t u s
quo
refuse to
Through the
religion has for the most part abandoned its original identity
which made
Radford Ruether, was the period of "the five centuries during which
the Christian church itself is transformed from a marginal sect
wi thin the messianic renewal movements of first century Judaism
into the new imperial religion of a Christian Roman Empire."103
Toward a
biographical dramas , " which became the "definit ive texts of the
sayings of the Lord."lU4 The "Spirit sent by Christ to the
community," notes Radford Ruether,
follow
the
Frankfurt
School's
methodological approach,
According to Horkheimer, an
In the
'O4
Ibid.
'O5 I b i d . , 1 2 3 .
'O6 Paul Peachy, " P r e f a c e , t 1 Concern: A Pamph 7et
( S c o t t d a l e : H e r a l d P r e s s , l956), 3.
Series, Vol
and
they
v. Ideology
As Geertz notes, "one of the
minor
once
"neutral," has
ironies of
modern
become
saturated
with
polemical
'O8
Ibid., 2 6 5 .
Ibid., 2 6 6 .
This methodology
and
the
particular
application
and
presuppositions will be examined i n more detail i n Chapter 2.
'O9
. . . , an
one
grasps
via
"suasive
images." one
reaches
a meaningful
In
"the term
cannot be easily
. . . ' [ Ildeology'
Geertz,
'
I b i d . , 219.
I b i d . , 231.
Ilc Thompson, Studies i n the T h e o r y o f I d e o l o g y , 1 - 2 .
Thompson c o n t i n u e s t h i s l i n e o f argument w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g :
"Few p e o p l e today would
proudly proclaim themselves t o be
' i d e o l o g i sts
, whereas many w o u l d n o t h e s i tate t o d e c l a r e t h a t t h e y
were c o n s e r v a t i ves, soci a1 i s t s o r r e v o l u t i o n a r i e s . Ideology i s the
thought o f t h e o t h e r , t h e t h o u g h t o f someone o t h e r t h a n o n e s e l f .
To c h a r a c t e r i z e a view as ' i d e o l o g i c a l ' is a7ready t o c r i t i c i z e i t ,
In this particular
study, the term ideology will be used in the sense of its critical
conception and Thompson's understanding of the study of ideology
will be adhered to: "To study ideology . . A s to study the ways in
be
religion. will
in which
religious
f o r 'ideology'
[Ibid.]
Ibid., 4.
Ibid.
T h e r e a r e as many d e f i n i t i o n s o f i d e o l o g y as p e o p l e who u s e
t h e term.
Thompson's d e f i n i t i o n w i 1 1 be a d h e r e d t o f o r t h e
purposes o f t h i s i n v e s t i g a t i o n , f o r i t o f f e r s a c l e a r , c r i t i c a f ,
M a r x i s t d e f i n i t i o n , c o i n c i d i n g w i t h the same s e n s e o f t h e t e r m a s
Adorno used i t .
l'
However,
Thus, as a cultural
art
is
in
"ever-present danger
[.
..
of ]
relaps[ing]
into
heteronomy . 119
lf
I b i d . , 119.
And i n c o n t r a s t t o s c h o l a r s o f t h e " v u l g a r p o s i t i v i s t " t y p e ,
1 m a i n t a i n that a c r i t i q u e o f t h e i d e o l o g y o f r e l i g i o n i s
essential, as w i 11 become c l e a r f rom t h i s i n v e s t i g a t i o n .
'la Adorno,
Aesthet
I b i d . , 337-8.
ic
T h e o r y , 41 6 .
"the moment
of
being-for-other" and
made
to express
in
from its stance of critique, art is able to reveal the cracks and
fissures of the world for what they are: art lays bare what al1
know and recognise, but none are wiliing to articulate.121
the artist
and
the
prophet
with
reference
to
the
I2O I b i d . , 163-4.
12' The terrns "autonornous a r t " and " a r t , " a s w e 1 1 as " a u t h e n t i c
a r t " w i 11 be used i n t e r c h a n g e a b l y i n t h i s i n v e s t i g a t i o n . When t h e
d i s c u s s i on r e f e r s t o a r t w h i ch is n o t autonomous, i t w i 1 1 be n o t e d .
The prophetic-liberating
124 Radford R u e t h e r ,
S e x i s m and God-Talk,
29.
125 I b i d . , 2 7 .
Ibid.
As 1 w i l l a r g u e , t h e same i s t r u e f o r a r t , f o r i t , too, must
respond t o t h e s i t u a t i o n i n w h i c h i t i s c r e a t e d .
it . 127
Art
as
Indeed. as
Horkheimer
stated:
"art. since
it
became
. .
autonomous,
has
preserved
the
utopia
that
evaporated
from
religion.,,130
Adorno argues that a r t ought to a r t i c u l a t e the oppressive
conditions of i t s s o c i a l c o n t e x t ; i n fact, he proposes that
[slurely it would be better for art t o vanish altogether than
to forget suffering, which is art's expression and which g i v e s
substance t o its form
Suffering, not positivity, is the
humane content of a r t . r3 1
Art
ought not
to
avoid
"[plerennial s u f f e r i n g
being
the voice
has as much
of suffering, for
to e x p r e s s i o n as a
right
In t h i s
Horkheimer,
l1
i n
Critica7
Theory:
369.
"'"
Becaue
As
"inspires shudder
in
the
face of
the
falsity of
that
essence.n 135
Prophets of the prophetic-liberating tradition very often used
ugly images and shocking language i n their critique. The prophet
1n a
A e s t h e t i c Theory, 321 .
I b i d . , 337.
135 I b i d . ,
366.
..
an ugliness. Adorno contends that "art has to make use of the ugly
in order to denounce the world which creates and recreates ugliness
in its own image."13'
The dissonance we
"managed reality."
In
pieces w i t h t h e i r swords."
Revised S t a n d a r d V e r s i o n ) ]
[Ezekiel
16:15,
35-37,
39-40
(New
I b i d . , 161.
j3'
H e r b e r t Marcuse, Negat i o n s : Essays i n C r i t i c a 7 Theory,
trans. Jeremy J . S h a p i r o ( B o s t o n : Beacon Press, 1 9 6 8 ) , x x .
order
to
more
radical
vision,
revolutionary
sublimated
of
work
otherwise' . "14'
art
there
is
hidden
'it
should
be
As Adorno explains:
This doubt that what is, really is all, is not based on nothing;
for if it were, why then would we despair?
" [glrayness could not fil1 us with d e s p a i r if our minds did not
Adorno,
142 Adorno,
"Cornmi t r n e n t ,
" 31 7 .
N e g a t i v e D i a 7 e c t i c s , 398.
I b i d . , 363.
144 I b i d . ,
377-8.
62
Indeed, by
their very
presence, works
of
art
"signal the
not know the shape of that which is yet-to-corne, nor can we know
its shape.
In the right condition, as in the Jewis? theologoumenon, al1
things would differ only a little from the way they are: but
not even the least can be conceived now as it would be then.
Despite this, we cannot discuss the intelligible character as
hovering abstractly, impotently above things in being; we can
talk of it only insofar as it keeps arising in reality, in the
guilty cpatext of things as they are, brought abot b y that
context .
For Adorno, all we can Say is that what is now, ought to be
It is important to note that even Jesus of Nazareth,
otherwise.
alternative.
He
spoke of a Samaritan, for example, who rescues his enemy left lying
j4'
Ibid.,
147 Adorno,
192.
N e g a t i ve D i a 7ect i c s , 2 9 9 .
63
By embracing the
Negations,
151
form. What form, one cannot Say. It is precisely for this reason
that not only is it futile for the artist to pretend to articulate
what an alternative would be, but it is also dishonest to pass off
1t i also
does not mean the artist and the prophet ought to be quiet, or
ought to stop creating.
..
kept in mind:
I t is true that the i n d i v i d u a l cannot change t h e course of the
world. But i f h i s whole l i f e i s not a gesture of wild d e s p a i r
that r e v o l t s against i t , he will f a i l t o realize that
i n f i n i t e l y srnall. insignificant. futile, nugahyry modicum o f
good of which he is capable as an individual.
In the face o f
terror
and
I n these very
the
possible.
THE
IDEOLOGY O F RELIGION
Adorno,
N e g a t i v e D i a Tectics, 397.
67
An ideology as a sytem
f1156
As
explained
Studies i n t h e T h e o r y o f I d e o l o g y , 1 - 4 .
156 I b i d . , 5 - 6 .
The v i e w o f i d e 0 1 ogy a s i1 1 u s i o n , states Thompson, " d r a w s
support f r o m a famous and o f t - q u o t e d passage i n which M a r x and
E n g e l s compare t h e o p e r a t i o n o f i d e o l o g y t o t h e w o r k i n g s o f a
camera obscura, which r e p r e s e n t s t h e w o r l d by means o f an image
t u r n e d upside-down."
Thompson contends that because ideology i s ,
i n f a c t , partfally c o n s t i t u t i v e o f w h a t f o r us i s V e a l , " t h a t
" f w ] e must r e s i s t t h i s v i e w . " [ I b i d . , S . ]
the
of the implications of
religion and art.
institutional forms of
rny
1. Ideology
think
69
. . .we
is likewise unable
to
moment in which one lives. The only hope for successfully dragging
up the buried theoretical presuppositions of an ideology, lies in
the possibility that one might be able to think against the grain
of that ideology. Although human beings live in and respond to the
Adorno
systern
These
herein
historical world "is not articulated once and for al1 but is in
each case the creation of the society concerned,"15'
p o s s i b l e that reality as it is now, could be other.
then it is
Adorno i n s i s t s
15'
..
To address
Theodor W . Adorno,
Se 7ected essays on mass
Routledge, 1991), 1 7 3 .
"Resi g n a t io n , " T h e Cu 1 t u r e I n d u s t r y :
7 t u r e , e d . J . M . Bernstei B (London :
CU
nihilo:
as
result
of
its
development
into
various
established
For in
were both propelled and shaped by the place of the Christian church
in its socio-historical moment.
'''
1970), 4 7 .
i. Religion as ideology
In his H i s t o r i c a l Fundamentals and the S t u d y of Religions.
partially
and
be
ideology. but
classified
insists that
under
"religion can
ideology. "'62
Rudolph
only
defines
"'ideology' - a religious ideology or t h e ideology of a religion and of a social. political and moral praxis. n165
16*
Rudolph,
Re7 igions, 65.
Historica7
FundamentaIs
and
Rudolph suggests
the
Study
163 I b i d . , 6 4 .
of
I b i d . , 65.
[Ibid.]
here that the social. political and moral praxis of a religion are
something other than the ideas of that religion.
would argue.
These elements of a
Comte, a nineteenth
century
must
have
at
least
"functional
equivalent"
of
166 A u g u t Comte, c i t e d i n P r u e s s ,
Explaining Religion,
109.
16'
- society itself.
ideology, "17'
in
the
ense
that
religion,
too.
has
Christian
faith,
'a
Adorno, N e g a t i v e D i a l e c t i c s , 316.
Durkheim d e v e l o p s t h i s t h e o r y o f r e l i g i o n i n The Efementary
F o r m s o f t h e Re 7 igious L i f e : "Re1 ig i ous r e p r e s e n t a t i ons a r e
c o l l e c t i v e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s w h i c h e x p r e s s c o l t e c t i v e r e a l it i e s ; t h e
r i t e s a r e a manner o f a c t i n g w h i c h t a k e r i s e i n the m i d s t o f t h e
assembled g r o u p s and w h i c h a r e d e s t i n e d t o e x c i t e , m a i n t a i n o r
r e c r e a t e c e r t a i n m e n t a l s t a t e s i n t h e s e g r o u p s . " [ D u r k h e i nt, The
EIementary F o r m s o f t h e Re7igious L i f e , 211 And, a n a l y s i n g t h e
t o t e m i c symbol o f a r e 1 ig i on, he s t a t e s : "The symbol is t h e o u t w a r d
and v i s i b l e forrn o f w h a t we have c a l l e d t h e t o t e m i c p r i n c i p l e o r
god.
B u t i t is a l s o t h e symbol o f t h e d e t e r m i n e d s o c i e t y c a l l e d
t h e c l a n . . . So if it is a t once t h e symbol o f t h e god and o f t h e
s o c i e t y , i s t h a t n o t because t h e god and t h e s o c i e t y a r e o n l y
one?. .The god o f t h e cl an, t h e t o t e m i c p r i n c i p l e , can t h e r e f o r e be
n o t h i ng e l s e t h a n t h e c l an i t s e l f , p e r s o n i f i e d and r e p r e s e n t e d t o
t h e i m a g i n a t i o n u n d e r t h e v i s i b l e forrn o f t h e animal or v e g e t a b l e
w h i c h s e r v e s as t o t e m . " [ I b i d . , 2361
22.
17* I b i d .
H o r k h e i m e r r e f e r s t o Thomas Aquinas as t h e one who "made t h e
Cath01 i c d o c t r i n e a m o s t v a l uabt e t o o l f o r p r i n c e s and t h e b u r g h e r
c l ass.
[ A n d f o r ] succeedi ng c e n t u r i e s soci e t y was w i 7 1 ing t o
e n t r u s t t h e c l e r g y w i t h t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f t h a t h i g h l y developed
id e o l o g i cal in s t r u m e n t " [Max Horkheimer, Ec7 i p s e o f Reason (New
Y o r k : O x f o r d Uni v e r s i t y Press, 1 9 4 7 ) , 67. ]
Horkheimer accuses
Instead o f developing i t s
Thomi sm o f b e i ng a "ha1 f - t r u t h .
t e a c h i ngs w i t h o u t c a r i n g about t h e i r u s e f u l ness,
it s e x p e r t
propagandi s t s have a1 ways adapted them t o t h e changi n g r e q u i r e m e n t s
...
class of society:
The religious-ecclesiastical realm is strongly pressured to
organize itself in such a way that it is adjusted to the
interests of the ruling classes, a pressure that takes the
form of economic, juridical, poli tical, cultural and even
repressive measures .
In this way, the Church serves a
conserv t ive and legitimating function for the ruiing
class.13
1 f Christianity can
Unfortunately. as Bof f
laments, "[ilt may happen that the Church has reproduced the
structures of the ruling classes wi thin itself, thereby creating an
equally unbalanced structure that reflects the dominant social
realm -
- -
--
174 H e w i t t ,
IT5
[ibid., 87.1
Herbert
C r i t i c a 7 T h e o r y o f Re7igion, 1 7 9 .
Marcuse,
One-Dimensions 7 Man: S t u d i e s i n t h e
Society ( B o s t o n : Beacon P r e s s ,
I d e o 70gy of Advanced I n d u s t r i a 7
1964; second ed. 1 9 9 1 ) , 47.
112.
religious
ideal
oppressed -
being
the
voice o f
for pragmatism, as i t
the
suffering
has corne t o
and
the
recognise t h a t
In
The task is to compare and analyze the ideal aad the reality of the
Christian church.
178 Horkhei m e r ,
179 B o f f ,
" 130.
18'
of Christianity has
forgotten and
how human
I f , with
Marx, one calls on human beings "to give up their illusions about
their condition," essentially, one is calling for them
a condition that requires illusions.
calls
"
to give u p
for the
"abolition of religion."
But does raising critical questions of religion and revealing
Not al1
of
In fact. there is a
183 Rudolph,
Re 7 igions, 69-70.
HistoricaI
Fundarnentals
and
's P h i l o s o p h y
the
Study
of
It
one mut
into a
introduced
critique
is
not.
religion f rom
the outside,"la6
therefore, always
religiously
"often
Religiou
autonornous.
In the background
book '
""' ~ h u s .self-crit i c a l
acknowledging
the
reality
of
the
established.
self-critical
the passing of the individual, still maintained the hope for selfreflection. I recognize that on this issue, I must part ways with
the Frankfurt School ; nevertheless , rny arguments for my position
184 I b i d . ,
70.
18'
I b i d . , 70.
j8?
Ibid.
lW6),
"'"
still the possibility that even one consciousness among those who
adhere to the Christian beliefs may defy reification and maintain
the capability to recognize even the "minimal di f ferences from the
It
"'*'which
ever-constant
becorne manifest.
Such a consciousness
"The
Culture
Industry,"
chap.
in
The
Culture
what it seems.
it is what can
be
breathed .
Criticism of ordained
criticises
for
'
lg2 I b i d .
lg3 Robert Hu1 lot-Kentor, " F o r w a r d ,
in T h e o d o r W . Adorno,
Kierkegaard: Construction o f t h e A e s t h e t i c , t r a n s . and e d . R o b e r t
Hu1 l o t - K e n t o r ( M i nneapol is : U n i v e r s i t y o f M i n n e s o t a P r e s s , W 8 9 ) ,
xxi i
However, one
must not ignore the dialectic in Marx's own critique. Yarx refers
to religion both as an illusion. as "the opium of the people." and
as "the expression of real suffering and a protest against real
suffering.
"should pursue
and attempt
to
validate
distress. * "
in
... insight
to
One
must be clear regarding just what the cal1 for abolition means.
Although the insights gained may lead one to cal1 for an abolition
of those aspects and power structures of religion which serve to
sustain the status quo, it does not necessarily mean that the
emancipatory elements of religion must also be abolished. In fact ,
one may be led to question why Marx
himself called
for the
To insist. as Adorno
the
repressive and
structure
"
those
Vdeology
critique.
86
Feminisrn and
the
Study
of
Rather, in
This
Ig7 T i 1 1 ic h , A H i s t o r y o f C h r i s t i a n T h o v g h t , 4 8 6 .
I n t h e r e c e n t f i l m " P r i e s t , " one o f t h e C a t h o l i c p r i e s t s ,
F a t h e r Matthew, expresses h i s d i s g u s t w i t h what he knows has been
g o i ng on in t h e h i story o f t h e Roman C a t h o l i c Church.
D u r i n g mass
he g i v e s a horni l y which addresses t h e f a c t t h a t many p e o p l e doubt
t h e e x i s t e n c e o f God.
He says: "But when 1 l o o k a t t h e Church
t o d a y and see c a r e e r i s t s and h y p o c r i t e s and p h a r i sees t h r i v i ng t h e n
I doubt t h e e x i s t e n c e o f God.
How could he l e t t h i s happen?
Cathedra1 s, b i s h o p s , popes, al 1 t h e t r a p p i ngs o f power - w e c a r e
more a b o u t t h a t t h a n
. . t h e t e a c h i n g s o f C h r i s t : l o v e and
compassion f o r a11 mankind, a77 mankind."
It i s s i g n i f i c a n t t h a t
t h e bishop p r e s e n t a t t h i s mass, w a l k s o u t d u r i n g t h e rniddle of t h e
homi 1y.
[ P r i e s t , d i r e c t o r , A n t o n i a B i r d , produced by M i ramax F i 1ms
and BBC F i 1ms, 1 9 9 5 . 3
...
"
264.
are
critically formed.
discrepancy between what they actually are and the values they
accep t . n201
they reflect the actual rift between the values of the social
agency and its reality - "they provide a basis for critique within
I b i d . , 265.
200 I b i d .
201 I b i d .
332.
Accordingly.
AS
a result.
institution
society makes its relations "felt in every nook and cranny of the
social whole," a methodological conception which takes account of
this fact is necessary.
the
*O2
Antonio,
Ymrnanent c r i t i q u e as t h e c o r e o f c r i t i c a l
t h e o r y , l t 333.
Accordi ng t o A n t o n i O ,
Horkheimer a r g u e s t h a t
"immanent
c r i t i q u e d e s c r i b e s t h e d i a l e c t i c i n h i s t o r y w h i c h i s d r i v e n by t h e
c o n t r a d i c t i o n s between i d e o l o g y and r e a l it y .
E l i t e s attempt t o
s t a l l change by d e n y i ng these c o n t r a d i c t i o n s ; t h e y p o r t r a y a f a 1 s e
u n i t y o f t h e i d e a l and r e a l
However, t h e g r e a t e r t h e i d e o l o g i c a l
d a i m s , t h e more dangerous t h e y become t o t h e i r s o c i a l c o n t e x t .
Immanent c r i t i q u e seeks, b y r e v e a l ing t h e c o n t r a d i c t i o n s o f d a i m
and c o n t e x t , t o t r a n s f o r m 1 e g i t i r n a t i o n s in t o e m a n c i p a t o r y weapons. "
[ I b i d . , 338.1
205 I b i d .
"Notes on I n s t it u t e A c t i v i t ies,
266.
beginning
to
the
distort ions
apparent
in
its
roles among
believers into priests and laity. The priest was charged with the
task of adapting the content of prophecy and religious tradition to
the everyday life of the laity. With the developing character of
the
Talcott
208 I b i d . , 65.
What
as a
began
charismat ic movement ,
eventually
The institution of
into an
goals.
bureaucracy:
In
the
short,
"a particular
Christian
church
became
its own
"Preface,
*"
"
The
for
technical
efficiency, places
premium
on
itself, 2 13
With the magnitude of the organization, cornes the need to
prophet who called the believers, then the priest who cared for
their
spiritual
needs ,
established
church
institutions have
which to carry out the mission of the church. the danger lurks that
human beings will no longer relate to one another as one human
being to another.
faceless and nameless to the members whom they serve, and the
members become clients who have needs which fit categories met by
services pxwided.215
bureaucrat will deal with it. If the need changes, another office
holder will take over. Sadly, what often develops is antipathy of
the bureaucratie expert toward the client. Such an attitude is of
church,"
In fact, many
train
their
strain faced by the office holder to show good face before the
members of the client-public.n216
The
system must continue to function no matter who does the job or who
receives the service.
This does not deny the continuation of the role of the priest.
Nevertheless, that office, too. has its place in the established
hierarchy of the church. consisting of the local, provincial/state.
regional and national levels.
In most
denominations of the
Ir
140.
ideology are established at the top and passed along down the
hierarchy to the p r i e t at the local leveL218 I t is the theology
of the Christian church. which from a "sociological point of view,
of
religious
group
may
appeal
for
guidance. ,. 219
continue.
doctrines
to
proclaiming
instrumentalities are
be
infused
allegedly
with
ultimate
just as
ultimacy
in
""'
truths.
likely as
religious
Theology
are
groups
can
be
they
risk
losing
contact
with
the
In so
people
..
1978),
116.
and the particular people who are members of the church and their
material situation.
an
individual
and
their
identity
The difference
remains
despite
abstraction
institutions can
lead
and
to
identity
thinking
carried
"increasingly intangible
out
by
forms of
225 I b i d . , 1 5 1 .
I n r e f e r e n c e to t h i s d i s c u s s i o n , Buck-Morss n o t e s : "One i s
reminded o f M a r x ' s comment - A Negro i s a N e g r o . He o n l y becomes a
SI
ave i n c e r t a i n rel a t i ons. ' "
[Karl Marx, "Wage Labour and
C a p i t a l , " K a r 7 Marx and Frederick Enge7s: Se7ected Works (New Y c r k :
I n t e r n a t i ona1 Pub1 i s h e r s , l972), 8 1 , quoted i n Susan Buck-Morss,
Wa 7 t e r
The O r i g i n o f Negat i v e Dia 7ect ics: Theodor W . Adorno,
B e n j a m i n , and t h e F r a n k f u r t Institute (New Y o r k : The F r e e P r e s s ,
M a c m i l l a n , 1977; 1 9 7 9 ) , 2 4 4 , n . 1 0 0 . 1
domination.m 226
In
established
church
institutions,
power
the
of the
institution
actuality.w228
"appears to
be
the universal:
reason in
?27 I b i d .
For f u r t h e r e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h i s phenomenon o f t h e power o f
words spoken - i n t h i s case, i n t h e o l o g i c a l e x p r e s s i o n - 1 t u r n t o
"The u t t e r a n c e o f
the s i m p l e s t e x p r e s s i o n i s an
Thornpson:
i n t e r v e n t i o n i n t h e w o r l d , more o r l e s s e f f e c t i v e , more o r l e s s
endowed w i t h in s t i t u t i o n a l a u t h o r i t y . .
It i s i m p o r t a n t t o s t r e s s ,
moreover, t h a t forms o f power i n f u s e the m e a n i n g o f what i s s a i d as
w e l l as t h e s a y i ng o f it . .
[ D l if f e r e n t in d i v i d u a l s o r g r o u p s have
a d i f f e r e n t i a l c a p a c i t y t o make a meaning s t i c k .
It i s the
i n f u s i o n o f meaning w i t h power t h a t l e n d s l a n g u a g e so f r e e l y t o t h e
o p e r a t ions o f i de01 ogy
Re1a t i ons o f domi n a t i on a r e s u s t a i ned by
a m o b i 7 i z a t i o n o f meaning w h i c h I e g i t i m a t e s , d i s s i m u l a t e s o r
r e i f i e s an e x i s t i ng s t a t e o f a f f a i r s . " [Thompson, S t u d i e s i n t h e
T h e o r y o f Ideo logy, 131 - 1 32.1
..
..
228 Theodor W.
Adorno and Max Horkheimer,
Diafectic o f
En7 ightenment: Phi 7osophica 7 Fragments (New York: C o n t i nuum, IgQO),
22.
church
institutions
since
corne
members
to
believe
that
the
In other
words, its legitimacy cornes n o t from below but from above, from the
will
of
God. "229
The
rationality
which
the
members
adopt
The
those in power even when oppressed, for they believe the claim of
teaching authority o f institutions of the church, even when that
power
of
Church:
230 Buck-Morss,
the
established
state
of
affairs. "231
that
quo. 232
lJ3'
one's m i n d .
delusion" which has people under its spell to such a degree that
they are unable "to hear the unheard-of with their own ears, to
touch the unapprehended with their own hands. ,,234
With the establishment of church institutions to carry out the
various functions, the attitude can arise which insists that these
institutions are essential.
than j u s t t h e m ~ e l v e s . ~
[Theron Schlabach, Peace, F a i t h , N a t i o n :
M e n n o n i t e s and Amish i n N i n e t e e n t h C e n t u r y A m e r i c a , The Mennoni t e
E x p e r i ence in America, V o l 2 (Scottdal e , P a . : Heral d P r e s s , l988),
100, quoted i n I b i d . ]
But as the l a r g e r s o c i e t y becornes aware o f
i s s u e s such as spouse abuse (because wives must submit t o t h e i r
husbands) w i t h i n C o n s e r v a t i v e and O1 d Order Mennoni t e communi t i e s ,
q u e s t i o n s o f c o n f o r m i t y , power and a u t h o r i t y i n t h a t community must
also be a d d r e s s e d .
Dialectic o f E n l i g h t e n m e n t , 3 6 .
structural
rigidity
perpetuation.
can
develop
in
order
to
ensure
self-
The
The
insistence that needs be met the way they have always been met can
mean that human spontaneity is out of the question.
It can become
established rationality
labour.
As a result
change from meeting the needs of the clients to simply meeting the
bottom line in order to keep the institution itself afloat.
An
103
carry out their mandate may be a good idea. but real achievement
may.
Tao
Because
ideal of
attendance
and
participation
might
suffer.,,238
The
--
- -
important to preserve the gains that have been made, than to "risk
..
. .. .
.. ..
..
functioning
society
States
is
"the function of
symbolic
integration ....
what Berger tags "the O.K. world." where the religious institution
becomes
"guarantee that
the world
is
as
it
should
be.
If
*"
Berger,
The Noise o f
Solemn Asernblie, 5 1 .
2L2 I b i d . , 93.
106
the very ideals to which Christians are to adhere. Bureaucratization itself may not be the issue. What does raise concern is the
fact that the religion which grew out of the tradition of the
prophets of Israel who were "critical of institutions in Israel as
part of a larger process of desacralization" has itself adopted
forms,
institutional
often
resulting
in
the
routinization.
corruption and legalization of its faith "to the extent that its
inner meaning was lost . f 1 2 4 3
of
instead of
of
the spiritw244which
inspired
the
birth
of
the
243 J .
Lawrence B u r k h o l d e r , "Toward a t h e o l o g y of c h u r c h
s t i t u t i o n s ( 1 1 : Mennoni tes have a1 ways been ambi v a l ent about
e i r i n s t i t u t i o n s , " Gospe7 Hera7d (September 13, l994). 2 .
M i l l e r , P r o f e s s o r o f B i b l i c a l S t u d i e s . Conrad
W a t e r l o o , O N . Persona1 c o n v e r s a t i o n , June 1994.
( U s e d by permi s s i on. )
244
John
W.
mindset , the argument is also made that "by the time an informa1
movement [such as the Christian church was when it began] has grown
'conservative,' i ts u s e f u l n e s s is probably over. w243
I t must also
In the
Sadly,
...exist
in
the
eyes
of
many
be
them may not be an option. Rather than bemoan this fact, one ought
to be aware of the dangers inherent in their existence and remain
relentlessly
critical
of
their
operations,
reminding
the
persona1 correspondence,
Christ,
January
While
Burkholder ,
he
also
acknowledges
that
his
theological
intention.'18
Say,
in the
language of church
dealing with
those
247
c. f.
institutions".
Burkholder,
"Towards
248 Personal c o n v e r s a t i o n ,
(Used by permi s s i o n . )
30
Augut
theology
1996,
of
Goshen,
church
I n d i ana.
achieve
the
original
religious
ideals.2 50
Demands
for
by
that t
To the extent
interpretations
which
diverge
from
the
authorized
251 Thompson,
252 I b i d . , 66.
Certainly
criticism
spontaneity and
ought
to
be
launched
when
human
- love for
of
church
institutions. 253
It
is
precisely
these
dissenting voices which must remain active, for the concern must
beings, not
with
the perpetuation
of
remain with
human
institution.
the
m i l e it is not
254 Jan M.
War,"
Lochmann, T h r i s t i a n t h o u g h t i n t h e Age o f t h e C o l d
255 The f a c t t h a t e s t a b l i s h e d c h u r c h i n s t i t u t i o n s i n e a r l y
t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y Europe d i d n o t s t a y in t o u c h w i t h human needs b u t
c o n c e n t r a t e d more on t h e s u r v i v a l o f t h e c h u r c h has l e d t o s t r o n g
a n t i - c h u r c h sentiments.
Paul T i 11 i c h w r i t e s o f t h i s s i t u a t i o n :
"The churches were t h e r e p r e s e n t a t i ves o f t h e id e o l o g i es which k e p t
t h e r u 1 ing c l asses i n power o v e r a g a i n s t t h e w o r k i ng masses.
This
was the tragic situation.
It i s a g r e a t t h i n g t h a t i n America t h i s
has happened on a much srna1 l e r s c a l e .
B u t i n Europe i t has led t o
t h e r a d i c a l a n t i r e l ig i o u s and a n t i - C h r i s t i a n a t t i t u d e s o f a l 1
labour
movements . . . . lt
was
not
the
'bad
atheistsl
- as
p r o p a g a n d i s t s c a l 1 them
w h o were r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h i s ; i t was t h e
fact
that
the
European
churches,
Orthodox,
Lutheran,
and
E p i scopal ian, were w i t h o u t s o c i a l sensi t i v i t y and d i r e c t i on.
They
were
d i rected
toward
1i t u r g i c a l
or
dogmatic
efforts
and
refinements, b u t t h e s o c i a l problem w a s l e f t t o d i v i n e providence."
[ T i 11i c h , A H i s t o r y o f C h r i s t i a n T h o u g h t , 4 8 3 . 1
is."256
official. establishment
"reported that when they did speak out, comments were more positive
than negative. n258
often positive than negative, then one could conclude that the
laity wish their religious leaders were more prophetic more often.
Indeed. it
institutions
may
be argued
too much
credibility if
one
insists
that
the
258 I b i d .
To
J. O f Conne1 1 e t a1 . (New Y o r k : S e a b u r y P r e s s , 1 9 7 4 ) , 4 9 .
"
266.
261 I b i d . , 2 6 5 .
Schroyer d e s c r i bes an immanent c r i t i q u e a s " a means o f
r e s t o r i ng ' a c t u a 1 i t y t o f a 1 s e appearance ' by f i r s t d e s c r i b i ng ' what
a s o c i a l t o t a l i t y h o l d s i t s e l f t o b e , and then c o n f r o n t i n g i t w i t h
what it is i n f a c t becomi n g
[ T r e n t S c h r o y e r , The C r i t i q u e of
D o m i n a t i o n (Boston: B e a c o n P r e s s , 1 9 7 3 ) , 30-31 . ]
The community of
(to follow
Max
Weber), of critiquing
inhumane
quo
and mirroring
262 T i 11 i c h l s r e f e r e n c e t o t h e C h r i t i a n c h u r c h i n England i n
t h e e a r l y p a r t o f t h e t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y i s b u t one example.
... .
God's rule into harmony with events in the world, the more the
""'
In
the case.
2) 1
B i b b y i n s i s t s t h e p r o b l e m 1 i e s w i t h t h e f a c t t h a t tlchurches
are
' in e p t
r e l ig i ous
compani es '
wit h
f 1awed
organi z a t i onal
structures
that
make
them
unable
to
sel1
their
product
effectively." [Ibid.]
1 would argue, however, t h a t the reason
c h u r c h e s ( h e r e 1 mean b o t h i n d i v i d u a l C h r i s t i a n communi t i e s and t h e
o f f i c i a 1 c h u r c h o r g a n i z a t i o n s ) a r e i n a c r i s i s i s because t h e y a r e
t r y i n g t o conform t o o r g a n i z a t i o n a l s t r u c t u r e s o f a b u s i n e s s w h i c h
i s n o t t h e church. A s 1 w i 11 argue, a r t must c o n c e n t r a t e on b e i n g
a r t , and 1ikewi se ought C h r i s t i a n communi t i e s and o f f i c i a 1 c h u r c h
o r g a n i z a t i ons c o n c e n t r a t e on b e i ng t h e ct-iurch; a n y t h i ng e l se is n o t
t h e church.
264 Horkheimer,
"
129.
265 H o r k h e i mer,
rather,
to
delve
into
particular
social
The ambivalent
its
culture.n268
between the claim and the context, the ideology and the reality,
become apparent.
Again and
in history, ideas
Horkheimer,
" N o t e s on I n s t i tute A c t i v i ti e s ,
268 I b i d .
117
"
266.
their
to
find
similar pattern
of
relationship
between
118
as art.
note in the discussion of his essay on the topic, "Theses Upon Art
and Religion Today."270
its
and
admits
an
affinity
between
religion and truth, One cannot ignore the fact that h e writes that
religion manifests truth as "the sigh of the oppressed creature,
the
heart
of
conditions.w273
heartless
world
and
the
sou1
of
soulless
religion
established
itself, in
its
forms, complies
various
with
the
But
historical officially
powers
causing
these
270 C . f .
Chapter 3 o f t h i s i n v e s t i g a t i o n .
271 Adorno,
" 679.
273 I b i d . , 2 4 4 .
religion, how can its prophets denounce the world which religion
itself is trying to conserve? 1 s it possible for a prophetic voice
to emerge and begin to articulate judgement on the religious
institution when
and
1 s it in
"fault
lin es^^^' of
of religion.
claim that "art may be the only rernaining medium of truth in an age
179.
275 As Adorno w r i tes i n h i s study of K i e r k e g a a r d , i t i t h e
" f a u l t 1 i n e s " of a t o t a l s t r u c t u r e which a r e " a s i g h o f hope; its
fault 1 i n e s a r e t h e t r u e c i p h e r s ,
a t once h i s t o r i c a l
and
ontologi c a l . " [Adorno, Kierkegaard, 139. ]
As this medium of
its
regressive forms of
structures of
power
and
disagreement with
4 place to
Hegel * s at tempt
to
to harrnony, no matter how much the late Hegel may subjectively have
had such tendencies... .ln Hegel the tendency of idealism is to move
beyond itself.
276 Adorno,
Aesthet i c Theory, 2 7 .
Adorno, Hege7: T h r e e S t u d i e , t r a n s . ,
Weber N i c h o l s e n ( C a m b r i d g e , M a s s . : M I T Press, 1 9 9 3 ) , 4 - 5 .
277 Theodor W .
Shierry
Moving beyond
( belief
in
"Reason and
century
revival
of
Offenbarungsrel igion
"*
forms
the
a
As part of his
writings .
Rolf
Wiggershaus highlights
ernphasized
the
paradox
to Horkheimer
the
theological
categories.n 2 8 0
On
the
other
hand.
also
in
lv2"
The influence of
combination of elements that one cornes to unders tand how Adorno ' s
theory points to "the central philosophical dilemma of Our time:
namely, how to think and operate without an appeal to the absolute,
on the one hand, without falling into Nietzschean nihilism. on the
other. ,,283
283 J o e l Whi t e b o o k ,
( S p r i n g 1 9 8 5 ) , 166.
"The
P o l it i c s o f
"Preface
Redemption,
to
the
" Te7os
new
63
edition,"
decision
to side with
reason
in the
debate
on
later
reason and
Immediately , however ,
"Knowledge
which is power
l1
they
285 I b i d . , 3 .
286 I b i d .
287 I b i d . , 4 .
As
With this ,
Whereas humanity at one time depended upon nature for its very
survival, now the survival of nature has come to depend on how
humanity manipulates it; total annihilation of nature b y humanity
other than human projection, there is no longer anything unknown for makers know that which they make.
to fear. But to maintain the upper hand over fear, everything must
be categorizable and countable.
6-7.
289 I b i d . , 5 .
290 I b i d . , 9 .
291 I b i d . ,
16.
That
But the great twist to the tale, claim Adorno and Horkheimer,
is that enlightenment returns to myth in the law of repetition,
which is the principle of myth itself.
That arid wisdom that holds there is nothing new under the
Sun, because al1 the pieces of the meaningless game have been
played , and al1 the great thoughts have already been thought ,
and because al1 possible discoveries can be construed in
advance and al1 men
decided on adapt ion as the rneans to
self-preservation.,. .
Inherent in the cycle of fate is the dread of the ever-same.
In
deities, but
"in
the
light
of
unprejudiced
292 I b i d . ,
7.
293 I b i d . ,
12.
294 I b i d . ,
46.
nature, has now become the victim of the structures of its own
Thus, Enlightenment, which was "supposed to bring
domination.
. . .as the
The road
will
see in Adorno's
Offenbarungsglaube,
specific
response
to
the
revival of
the requirements o f
In
295 I b i d .
28-29.
The only way in which theology can survive in the aftermath of the
Enlightenment is in a small
insignificant
micrological form
In contrast t o Hegel, Adorno did not see hurnanity's selfconsciousness as sublated in absolute consciousness; the negation
of the negation does not , for Adorno, lead to a positive Absolute.
Nor is theology completely sublated in an absolute.
Certainly in
Nevertheless, even in
The
Negat i v e D i a T e c t i c , 4 0 7 .
298 I b i d .
299 Adorno,
Hege7:
T h r e e S t u d i e s , 87.
129
b y reason.n302
chess game and in order to win al1 the time, its every move must be
determined by theology.
Wiggershaus
for example.
suggests that like the puppet of Benjamin's story, " i t was merely
300 I b i d . , 408.
301 I b i d . , 3 9 7 .
religion.
This
"profane
be
show
to
converge.. . . ,,307
For
Adorno,
the
sublated
into a
philosophical concept.
Rather,
Kierkegaard,
307 Buck-Morss,
283.1
incommensurability.
In
his
essay,
"Vernunft
und
between reason and revelation tiad already been won by reason during
the eighteenth century. Nevertheless, its revival in the twentieth
century merits a response.
The revival of "Offenbarungsglaube" is , in Adorno's opinion,
actually futile.
He inits that
because they are seeking its truth. but rather because they need
orientation for their lives in a world without meaning.
I n this
609.
In their attempts to
Ibid.,
608.
311 I b i d .
I b i d . , 610.
Adorno c r i t i c i ses t h e P r o t e s t a n t f a i t h ' s emphasis on " t h e
primacy o f f a i t h W as an example o f t h i s demand f o r t h e s a c r i f i c e o f
i n t e l l e c t : t h e "innuendo" o f t h i s emphasis, he concl udes, i s t h a t
o f "bl ind f o l 1 o w i ng . " [ A d o r n o , T h e Psycho1 o g i c a l Techniques o f
M a r t i n L u t h e r Thomas; R a d i o Addresses," 65.1
nowhere .313
be
Adorno,
V e r n u n f t und O f f e n b a r m g ,
"
61 1 .
In turn. this desire for transcendence functions merely as a coverup for "societal hopelessness."
fear,
it undermines itself.
positive religions are willing to use these fears for their own
Luther
Addresses," 17.
One notes many parallels which Adorno draws between the
persona1 ity o f Martin Luther Thomas and Adolf Hitler, both whom h e
consi d e r s to be total i tari an 1 eaders who mani pu1 ate thei r
1,321
thinking,"
since
way,
He uses reason to
fol 1 o w e r s .
320 I b i d . , 3 8 .
321 I b i d . , 7 3 - 7 4 .
322 I b i d .
manipulation is apparent:
I appeal to the man who walks the streets that you remember
there is coming a day, my friend, when God will compel you to
give an account of the deeds that you are done in the body
[sic]. My friend, are you an American? Are you a Christian?
If you are, you will take cognizance of the s&fuation facing
herica, b u t if you are not you are a coward-
terror
by
draws
upon
the
oldest
resource
of
terrorism . vv 325
The theological message which Thomas shares with his audience
is
based
on
highly
selective set
of
Biblical
passages,
exclusively taken from the New Testament. What the audience hears
has none of the "reconciliatory features of Christian teaching,"
Instead, notes Adorno, there is a "constant stress on the negative
elements, such as the idea of the evil and eternal punishment, the
defamation of the intellect, and the exclusiveness of Christianity
against
other
combined
with
religions, particularly
this
are
references
to
Judaism."326
the
faith
~leverly
of
one's
323 I b i d .
324 M a r t i n L u t h e r Thomas, r a d i o a d d r e s s , 26 May 1935, c i t e d i n
I b i d . , 74.
325 I b i d .
326 I b i d . , 9 5 .
" forefathers."
According
to
Adorno
such
references
carry
" vernunftfeindlich.
t1329
Atternpts to bring
327 I b i d . , 1 1 0 - 1 1 1 .
328 I b i d . , 1 1 1 .
329 Adorno, l l V e r n u n f t und O f f e n b a r u n g ,
138
l'
61 3 - 6 1 4 .
religion
gives
up
its
claims, which
it
cannot
prove
manner.
have the same meaning for Christians who live in a world where
bread is (over-) abundantly mass produced as it does for those wbo
experience famine, especially when in our world today it is social
and material circumstances which bring about these inequities. One
ought not to a b i d e by naive literal interpretation of the words of
the
Gospel,
nsists Adorno.
And
yet, Adorno
admits, the
theology to make them fit the times, then the changes, and even the
act of making such changes, are incompatible with the authority of
revelation.
impossible
mediated
from
determination
each
and
concrete ,
adhere
to
socially-historically
the
letter
to
the
I b i d . , 615.
Without
331 I b i d .
332 I b i d .
A c c o r d i n g t o E l l i o t Wolfson, i t was t h e b e l i e f o f medieval
Jewish p i e t i sts i n t h e Rhi neland r e g i on ( o f p r e s e n t - d a y Gerrnany)
t h a t a s c e t i c i s m ( i n p a r t i c u l a r , o b t a i n i n g frorn a11 forms o f sexual
and bodi ly c o n t a c t ) l e a d s t o a v i s u a l i z a t i o n o f t h e d i v i n e g l o r y .
T h i s v i s u a l iz a t i o n c o u l d o n l y be g i v e n by t h e d i v i n e g l o r y , i t s e l f ,
as i t had been g i v e n t o t h e p r o p h e t s who " m e r i t e d an epiphany o f
t h e d i v i n e splendeur. " To be g i v e n such a v i s u a l iz a t i o n was t h e i r
i d e a l . [ E l 1i o t R . Wo1 f s o n , "Sacred Space and M e n t a l Iconography:
Imago T e m p 7 i and Contemplation i n Rhi ne1 and Jewi sh P i e t i srn, " Guest
L e c t u r e s e r i e s , Centre f o r t h e Study o f R e l i g i o n , U n i v e r s i t y o f
Toronto, 29 January 1996. ]
I n response t o my q u e s t i o n r e g a r d i n g
t h e i n f l u e n c e o f t h i s t r a d i t i o n on Adorno, Wolfson s t a t e d t h a t he
could n o t a g r e e w i t h Adorno's i n t e r p r e t a t i o n .
For t h e Jewish
to think far enough beyond the boundaries set by the spell to see
that it is in fact not total.
only the herb named 'Sneezejoy' will free the enchanted 'Dwarf
Nose' in Wilhelm Hauff's fairy tale. n333
407.
the
makes that which is absolute identical with al1 that it is not the anthropomorphic and, therefore, not absolute.
In a discussion of Adorno's references to religion, one cannot
ignore those scholars, who, like Wayne Whitson Floyd, Jr. insist
thatf'Adorno'sself-consciouslynon-religious,negative-dialectical
writings need to be placed back into the context of their more
explicitly theological roots."
While Floyd
by
the theological fragments which remain. And today they are "put to
the t e s t , " as he states in "Vernunft und Offenbarung," not when
they remain attached to religious communities and authorities, but
in the context of the world in which we live, in the secular and
profane.337
And
symbolizes
nothing
but
another
336 Adorno,
N e g a t i v e D i a lect i c s , 399.
337 Adorno,
"Vernunft
und O f f e n b a r u n g ,
143
" 608.
symbol,
another
of
negative
theology
in
their
discussion of
the
Enlightenment:
In Jewish religion . ..the bond between name and being is still
The
recognized in the ban on pr'onouncing the name of God.
disenchanted world of Judaism conciliates magic by negating it
in the idea of God. Jewish religion allows no word that would
alleviate the despair of ail that is mortal. It associates
hope only with the prohibition against calling on what is
false as God, against invoking the finite as the infinite.
lies as truth.
The guarantee of salvation lies in the
rejection of any belief that would replace t : it is knowledge
obtained in the denunciation of illusion.
3h
They conclude that all that can be said about the absolute, about
Any
positive
1v340
I t i the ideal
the
inhumane
Positive
theology maintains that the absolute can be named and that al1
names and
al1
things.
"so far as
they
are
positive," are
and
maintains
that
al1
names
for
the
absolute
Both Stresius and Tillich indicate the Jewish ban on the image of
God as a significant source for the tradition of negative theology.
But they also emphasise that the tradition as it bas corne to be
known is "unthinkablev without the influence of platonic and neoplatonic philosophy; the absolute who is both one and beyond any
possible being, transcending al1 that exists. could only ever be
341 Horkheimer,
92.
it.n345
Adorno will
miseries. "34i
trust
The very
344 I b i d . , 233.
1 do n o t see i t a s a necessary p a r t o f t h i s p r e s e n t
i n v e s t i g a t i o n t o go in t o a d e t a i 1ed d i s c u s s i o n o f the h i s t o r y o f
the t r a d i t i o n o f negative theology.
I p o i n t t h e reader t o t h e
S t r e s i us study f o r s p e c i f i c arguments r e g a r d i ng t h e in f 1uence o f
t h e h i s t o r y o f t h e t r a d i t i o n on Adorno, o r f o r a more g e n e r a l
i n t r o d u c t i o n t o t h e t r a d i t i o n , c f . T i 11 i c h , A H i s t o r y o f C h r i s t i a n
Thought, S O f f , 9 O f f .
An in t e r e s t i ng p o i n t t o n o t e , n e v e r t h e l ess,
i s t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e t r a d i t i o n s i n t h e West v e r s u s i n t h e E a s t .
Whereas i n t h e w e s t e r n t r a d i t i o n , the emphasis i s on t h e 1 i n g u i s t i c
dimension, i n t h e e a s t e r n t r a d i t i o n , t h e i n e f f a b i l i t y o f t h e
a b s o l u t e i s connected t o t h e q u e s t i o n o f a c t i o n t h a t l e a d s t o nona t t a c h m e n t , as i n f o r example, Buddhism. [ c f . Robert S c h a r l emann,
ed. , N e g a t i o n and Theo7ogy ( C h a r l o t t e s v i 11e, Va: U n i v e r s i t y o f
V i r g i n i a P r e s s , 1992).]
345 Adorno,
Negative
Dialectics, 402.
Negative D i a l e c t i c s , 398,
146
Studien
zu Adorno
means."
precisely
prohibition."348
They
in
" faithful
the
refer
to
thi
pursuit
faithful
of
pursuit
its
of
11351
the Frankfurt School "no hopes could be called sure, although the
need to hope was no less urgent. "352
As there is no guarantee of
a s optimism
--
das Denken
1988), 43.
Studien ru Adorno
"despair dissociates the self, and the ruins of the shattered self
are the marks of hope-"354
Crucial
for
his
negative
dialectic
is
the
strives " to grasp the thing" by aiming "at the opposite," for "it
is only in the absence of images that the full object could be
conceived. "35i
353 I b i d .
354 Adorno,
K i e r k e g a a r d , 85.
358 I b i d . , 406.
In the lines of t h e
which is
eschatological
D i a 7 e c t i c o f En7 ightenment,
24.
Kierkegaard, 126.
I n h i s "Forwardu t o t h e book,
360 Adorno,
Hu1 l o t - K e n t o r r e f e r s t o t h i s
but
the
particular
passage:
"This
passage
is
beauti ful ,
mistakenness o f t h i s beauty i s b e t r a y e d b y i t s c o s i n e s s , w h i c h
b r i n g s i t t o t h e edge o f r a t i o n a l i z a t i o n . Kafka's q u o t e d - t o - d e a t h
'Hope, b u t not f o r u s f i s s o b e r l y o p t i m i s t i c i n comparison w i t h
t h e s e passages. The best t h a t can be done f o r them i s t o t r a n s l a t e
t h e m back i n t o t h e h e l p l e s s n e s s t h a t m o t i v a t e s them.. .I n
A e s t h e t i s c h e T h e o r i e (l969), h i s l a s t work, t h e i d e a o f hope no
l o n g e r s a i l s t h r o u g h t h e window: r a t h e r t h e work f o l l o w s o u t t h e
idea o f a l legory.
I n t h e sparseness o f t h e l a t e Adorno, t h e a i r
may be t h i n , b u t i t i s what can be b r e a t h e d : i t c a r r i e d o u t t h e
r e v i s i o n o f t h e e a r l i e r image o f t h e r e a d i n g o f t h e p a l i r n p s e s t :
' A u t h e n t i c a r t knows t h e e x p r e s s i o n o f t h e e x p r e s s i o n 1 ess, a c r y i n g
from which t h e t e a r s a r e m i s s i ng.
[Adorno, A e s t h e t i c Theory,
n . p . , c i ted i n H u l l o t - K e n t o r , flForward,lf i n I b i d . , x x i i . ]
Sparse
o r n o t , t h e a i r o f hope can s t i l l be b r e a t h e d ; t e a r s o r no t e a r s ,
t h e c r y s t i 1 1 has a r i g h t t o a v o i c e
even a f t e r A u s c h w i t z .
361 R i c h a r d Wolin,
The Terms o f C u 7 t u r a 7 Criticism:
The
F r a n k f u r t Schoo7, Existentia 7ism and P o s t s t r u c t u r a 7ism ( N e w York:
Col umbi a U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1 9 9 2 ) , 76.
his
AS we will note in
of Adorno's
aesthetic
theory .
theory
is an
Likewise
his
The only possibility for any hope of glimpsing the utopia which has
never-yet-been in any form. is in the subversive negation of
present reality as revealed in art. After Enlightenment 's ruin of
theology and the manipulation and domination of humanity in forms
which are more and more intangible to which rationality has led,
only in authentic works of art does Adorno find any possible refuge
for intimations of utopia.
363 W o l i n ,
UNRELENTING N E G A T I V E T Y :
PROIPHETIC
VOICE OF ART
"[Alrt
. .. a l w a y s
a force of p r o t e s t
354 A d o r n o ,
In his essay, "Theses Upon Art and Religion Today, " Adorno
makes it clear that in his opinion any renewed attempt at creating
In this
dialectic
of
art
can
the
spell
of
identifi ~ a t i o n "without
~~~
reverting to the dogma of an ideology,
whether that be religious or political. Through its insistence on
the difference between reality as it appears under the spell of
what we have corne to accept as the dominant way of thinking and
reality by its real name, art negates the status quo insistence
that reality as it is, is identical to reality as it should be.
Art maintains the tension of this dialectic in its preservation of
in
Adorno's
theory
of
Hegel's
theory
of
the
Art demands
judgement in
response to it. Then hope for that which has-never-yet been might
become a possibility.
"Theses Upon
Art
and
but
I n his essay.
blasphemy. "366
An
defines
important
aspect
of
this
today is
Adorno's
If indeed
there ever was such a unity, this unity was based on "the whole
objective structure of society during certain phases of history"
and not on some cooperative purpose.367
367 I b i d . , 677.
153
" 679.
because
He refers to
of
As
a reult
the
humane
"art
against
the
pressure
is, a force of
of
domineering
368 I b i d .
369 I b i d .
370 I b i d . , 678.
37! I b i d .
repressive function.
f13iZ
"ornamental."
than
"a
. . . religious
372 I b i d .
373 I b i d .
present
context
blasphemy. "3i4
is,
in
Adorno's
opinion,
"nothing
but
The ideas of
Even if one
thin
the
as
truisms
pronounced
in
Sunday
Schools
and
into a mere
ideology.
679.
375 I b i d .
376 I b i d . 680.
377 I b i d .
In h i s A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , Adorno r e i t e r a t e s t h i s p o i n t : " O f a l 1
t h e paradoxes i n a r t , t h e most c e n t r a l o n e rnay b e t h e f a c t t h a t a r t
f i nds n o n - a r t e f a c t u a l
t r u t h on1 y by p r o d u c i ng speci fic and
t h o r o u g h l y e l a b o r a t e d w o r k s , t h a t i s t h r o u g h making, n e v e r by g o i ng
a f t e r t r u t h w i t h t h e gaze of immedi acy. "
[Adorno, A e s t h e t i c
Theory, 1 9 1 . ]
156
existed
an
intimate
relationship
between
art
and
religion.
But
this magic is not found in the content or form of art, but rather
in the traits of art.
seller
bes t
writer"
claim
some
magic
" irrationality
and
In contrast, the
"to make
itself
adequate
its magic, art must not prate about its magical, irrational
quality.
In conclusion, Adorno admits that while the dichotomy between
" 680.
380 Adorno, "Theses Upon A r t and Re1 igi on Today, " 680.
the
Yet it is
381 I b i d . ,
681.
382 I b i d .
I n h i s Aesthetic T h e o r y , Adorno s t r e s s e s t h a t n o t o n l y must
a r t n o t look a t u n i v e r s a l s , b u t " [ a l r t speaks i n u n i v e r s a l s o n l y
when it moves away f r o m u n i v e r s a 7s t o s p e c i f i c impul ses. " [Adorno,
A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 2 9 3 (Ital i C S m i n e ) . 3
Once again. it is not for art to make the universal concept its
"theme."
Rather.
only
by
concentrating
on
its
concrete
As
(or
theory
of
that
social-historical context.
Today
reactions to art may be dif ferent because the general theory under
which contemporary human beings live may not be the same as the
religious theory of another age. Indeed to maintain that today art
384 Adorno, Theses Upon A r t and Re1 igion Today,
159
677.
. . .would
first the
remained
The
inner logic" of
"stultified," for
its
form
was
388 W o l i n ,
The T e r m s o f Cu7tura7 C r i t i c i s r n ,
" 106.
65.
for the same purpose. Odysseus, "by calculating his own sacrifice,
,,.effectively negates the power t o whom the sacrifice is made."
Thus it is with al1 human sacrifices, for "when systematically
executed, [sacrifices] deceive the god to whom they are made: they
subject him
powe r .
to the primacy
""' But
And
in
I t is
D i a 7ect i c o f
Works of
En 7 ightenment, 50.
390 I b i d .
391 I b i d . ,
51.
U n f o r t u n a t e l y s a c r i f i c e does n o t end a f t e r t h e age o f
Odysseus . R a t h e r , t h e " h i s t o r y o f c i v i l i z a t i o n i s t h e h i s t o r y o f
the introversion o f s a c r i f i c e .
I n o t h e r words: t h e h i s t o r y o f
r e n u n c i a t i on. Everyone who p r a c t i ses r e n u n c i a t i o n g i ves away more
o f h i s 1 i f e t h a n i s g i v e n back t o hirn: and more t h a n t h e l i f e t h a t
he v i n d i c a t e s . T h i s i s e v i d e n t i n t h e c o n t e n t o f t h e f a l s e s o c i e t y
i n which e v e r y o n e i s s u p e r f 1 u o u s and i s d e c e i v e d . "
[ I b i d . , 55.1
the
absolute.n 392
Adorno refers to art's
the
As
longer legitimate itself in terms of a logically prior, allInstead, it is free to develop its own
intrinsic forma1 potentialities to an unprecedented extent. " 394
encompassing worldview.
--
--
392 A d o r n o , A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 1 9 3 .
393 Jay, Adorno, 1 5 7 .
394 Max Weber c i t e d i n Wolin, The Terrns o f Cultural C r i t i c i s m ,
65-66.
395 Wol i n ,
"The D e - A e t h e t i c i z a t i o n o f A r t ,
'' 105.
Rather, because of
its "allerg[y] to any relapse into rnagic, art is part and parce1 of
the process of
the disenchantment of
Adorno
semblance
of
art,
art
is
"inextricably entwined
with
no
that
is
coincident with
this-worldly concerns.v398
the
world-
Or. as Adorno
States, art is in fact "what is left over after the magical and
cult functions of archaic art have fallen by the wayside. " 399
Achieving autonomy from religion, ran also be referred to as art's
achievement of "self-consciousness." This process was "vigorously
renewed in the 19th century with
romanticism and
396 Adorno, A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 8 0 .
397 I b i d .
106.
1 'art pour
1 'art.w400
art today
liberation
during
the
Renaissance
reflected
concerns
17
102
If no longer
400 I b i d .
Chapter 4 .
'O2 I b i d . , 93.
'O3
I b i d . , 107.
In fact, if art
'14*'
The difficulty
that
It is on this
- --
404 I b i d . ,
482 ( I t a l i c s m i n e ) .
"The D e - A e t h e t ic i z a t i on of A r t ,
rf
1 07.
406 I b i d .
D i a 7ect i c o f En 7 i g h t e n m e n t , 1 9 .
Benjamin also s t a t e d t h a t even a f t e r works o f a r t were no
l o n g e r made as c u l t o b j e c t s , t h e y s t i 1 1 r e t a i n e d a c e r t a i n "aura"
which o r i g i n a t e d i n t h e i r r i t u a l f u n c t i o n .
T h i s "aura" i s a
" ' unique phenomenon of a d i stance
however close it may b e r [ a n d ]
r e p r e s e n t s n o t h i n g b u t t h e f o r m u l a t i o n o f t h e c u l t value o f t h e
work o f art i n c a t e g o r i es o f space and t i m e p e r c e p t i o n . D i stance i s
The e s s e n t i a l l y d i s t a n t o b j e c t i s t h e
t h e opposite o f closeness.
Unapproachabi 1 it y [ s i c ] is i ndeed a m a j o r
unapproachabl e one.
q u a l i t y o f t h e c u l t image.
True t o i t s n a t u r e ,
it remains
' d i s t a n t , however c l ose i t rnay be. '
The c l o s e n e s s w h i c h one rnay
g a i n from i t s s u b j e c t m a t t e r does n o t irnpai r t h e d i s t a n c e which i t
r e t a i ns in it s appearance. [Ben jami n, " A r t i n t h e Age o f Mechanical
Reproduction," 243, n o t e 5.1
407 Adorno and Horkheimer,
also
from
the
to Say
that
Adorno
false
quo.
'O8
'O9
Ibid.
"O
Adorno,
166
" 679.
art condemns the lie of reality and like the prophets of the Jewish
In the contemporary
Art, which is t h o r o u g h l y
gives
suppresses.
form
to
the
suffering which
the
lie of
411 A d o r n o ,
Negative Dialectic, 1 7 - 1 8 ,
412 Adorno,
413 H o r k h e i m e r ,
'j4
reality
"Thought on Re1 i g i o n ,
l1
679.
129.
I b i d . , 130.
Adorno,
167
critical
impulse,
but
religion
in
its
forms
of
official
For Adorno,
. . .always
"
However, key to
those
and
reflects
ideals
of
"hope under
hopeless
Adorno,
Now, Adorno
A e s t h e t i c Theory, 2 7 .
Ibid.
168
" 678.
have
fallen
cornplete
into
silence.vr 419
Prophets
was often unpleasant and crude as they condemned the evil around
them: likewise art "has to make use of the ugly in o r d e r to
denounce the world which creates and recreates ugliness in its own
image. "421
refuses to
Art
disintegration of reality.
cover up
As
b e , if
find itself in
Aesthetic T h e o r y , 96.
420 I b i d . , 48.
'*'
Ibid.,
72.
'**I b i d . ,
74.
I n h i s discussion o f the de-aestheticization
o f a r t per
A d o r n o ' s t h e o r y , Wol i n draws a c o n t r a s t between b e a u t i f u l a r t o f
t h e p a s t and u g l y , o r d i s s o n a n t art o f the p r e s e n t :
"If i n
t r a d i t i o n a f s o c i e t i es, whose u n i v e r s e w a s governed by the n o t i o n o f
c y c l i c a l t i m e , where t h e p r e d i c t a b l e and f a m i l i a r p o s i t i o n o f t h e
sun i n t h e sky would p r e s c r i b e t h e r h y t h m o f d a i l y life, t h e
d o m i n a n t c a t e g o r y o f a e s t h e t i c s was t h a t o f b e a u t y , i n modern
s o c i e t i e s , where t h e f l o w o f 1 if e has been a l 1 b u t r e d u c e d t o a
series
of
minutely
subdivided
instants,
that
is,
to
the
c a l c u l a t i ons o f t i me-cl ock and s t o p - w a t c h , t h e predomi n a n t c a t e g o r y
o f a e s t h e t i c s has becorne t h a t o f d i ssonance. . by v i r t u e o f its
's i n is t e r '
qua1 it i e s , d i s s o n a n t a r t i s t h e o n l y a r t t h a t r e t a i n s
the c o u r a g e to c a l 1 s o c i e t y by it s a c t u a l narne. " [Wol i n , "The DeA e s t h e t i c i z a t i o n o f A r t , " 105.1
. .
more just reality. The antinomy of art not only indicates that the
reconciliation of present reality is a false reconciliation, it
also carries the connotation that true reconciliation lies beyond
what we know as present reality as we kzow it.
"only what does not fit into this world is true-n 123
Adorno views art as the last possibility of a refuge for hope
for humanity in a hopeless world.
abstractly once and for all, but occasionally and in concrete ways,
when it unconsciously and tacitly polemicizes against the condition
of society at a particular point in tirne. n 4 2 4
Becaue of the
immense gap between reality and true reconciliation, the only way
in which art can bring the "spell" to light is through relentless
negativity .
7.
whereas theology al1 too often loses contact with the particular
and concrete in its abstractions, art maintains that connection.
In its indictment of the spirit of its age, art grows out of and
Because it intirnately
Art
of the s t a t u s
quo;
the
and does cry out: "This is how chaotic your order actually is. n 428
I I . Negative Dialectics
"'''
Adorno,
'*'
Adorno,
A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 138.
H e g e l : T h r e e S t u d i e s , 50.
172
tt431
the outcorne
of
undialectical
affirmation.
reconciliation
and
432
Shierry
Weber
Nicholen
and
Jeremy
J.
Shapi r o ,
" I n t r o d u c t i o n , " in Adorno, Hege7: Three S t u d i e s , x i .
Buck-Morss e x p l a i ns t h a t un1 i ke Marx, Adorno s " a h was not t o
d e v e l o p a t h e o r e t i c a l s y n t h e s i s, b u t t o d e c i p h e r a c o n t r a d i c t o r y
[Buck-Morss, The O r i g i n o f N e g a t i v e D i a 7ectics, 97.]
r e a l it y . "
Through their
the
From Adorno's
irrvocabley
silenced
by
Auschwitz. .j3'
The
historical
434 Adorno,
N e g a t i ve D i a 7ect i c s , 3 .
129.
The
' polished
Adorno
the philosopheme of
pure
To maintain
the dialectic
tension between
the
particular and the concept and resist the impulse which would make
the two identical, is of paramount importance to the theory of the
negative dialectic. " T h e name of dialectics says no more, to begin
of identity, the
fact that the concept does not exhaust the thing conceived.,r 138
The tension between the object and
436 Adorno,
N e g a t i ve D i a l ecti C S ,
C37 I b i d .
438 I b i d . ,
5.
361 - 2 .
be
the concept,d39
"totalizing
conceptualizations
[which)
function[]
to
annex
But
to
resist
reality's
appearance
is
to
"think
the
1n fact, as
last
the
439 I b i d . ,
refuge of
freedom."442
The
dialectic
11.
441 Adorno,
442 J a y ,
P e r m a n e n t Exi Tes, 6 .
The dialectical
method must maintain its materialist edge. for the theory will only
643 Adorno,
"'
M i n i m a MoraTia, 73.
Adorno,
Hege 7 :
Adorno,
M i n i m a Moralia, 2 4 4 .
T h r e e Studies, 39.
closed
interrupted, in an
refuse[] to adapt
paths
of
thought, but
' intermittent
themselves
dialectic',
to
the
by realities which
interpretation, and
[is] constantly
by
The aim is to
The F r a n k f u r t Schoo 7 , 9 4 .
448 Adorno,
Hege 7 : T h r e e S t u d i e s , 1 0 8 .
449 Adorno,
N e g a t i v e D i a lect i c s , 1 5 7 .
One must
In
truth. n450
the
repressed truth of
4s
450
Lambert
Zuidervaart,
A d o r n o ' s A e s t h e t ic Theory:
The
Redemption o f 1 7 7usion (Cambridge, Mass: M I T P r e s s , 1991 ) , 5 6 .
451 Theodor W . Adorno, " O f f e n e r B r i e f an Max H o r k h e i m e r , " D i e
Z e i t ( 1 2 F e b r u a r y l965), 3 2 , c i t e d i n Benjamin Snow, " I n t r o d u c t i o n
t o A d o r n o ' s ' T h e A c t u a l it y o f P h i l o s o p h y , " Te7os 31 ( S p r i ng I W i ) ,
113, n o t e 2 .
452 Adorno,
A e s t h e t i c Theory,
1.
What we recognize
*t
136.
455 Adorno, A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 4 8 2 .
. . .structures
Although
456 Z u i d e r v a a r t ,
~ r only
t
Adorno's A e s t h e t i c Theory, 1 2 3 .
the]
repression of
heterogeneities
beneath
the
theory presupposes
the
"corresponding
~ ~ e c i f i c i
~ ~ with
~ ~ ~its
~ socio-historical moment.
oftart
Art, like
i t s n o n 4 d e n t i t y n o t b e i ng an exampl e o f a greater u n i v e r s a l , b u t
a s i ngular instance o f i t s e l f .
For Adorno, any c o n c e p t i o n o f t h e
autonomy o f a r t , o t h e r t h a n t h e p o s i t i o n a g i v e n work o c c u p i e s i n
n e g a t i ve r e l a t i on t o it s O t h e r [ie . i t s s o c i O-hi s t o r i cal c o n t e x t ] ,
r e g r e s s e s i n t o r e i f i c a t i o n and a r e p r e s s i ve p o s i t i v i s m . l 1
[Ibid. ]
"'
I b i d . 192.
460 I b i d . , 191.
461 Adorno,
462 I b i d . , 223.
to
often names this "die Sehnsucht nach dem Anderen - the desire for
the other.n466
183.
I n an essay on Schonberg, Adorno r e i t e r a t e s the n e c e s s i t y of
t o t h e c o n t e x t o u t o f w h i c h i t grows.
Speaki ng
s p e c i f i c a l ly o f t h e t r a d i t i o n of music, Adorno w r i t e s : " O n l y t h a t
w h i c h has been n o u r i s h e d w i t h t h e 1 i f e b l o o d o f t h e t r a d i t i o n can
p o s s i b l y have t h e power t o c o n f r o n t it a u t h e n t i cal 1 y . "
[Adorno,
Prisms, 1 5 5 . 1
art's t i e s
464 P e t e r B r g e r , "The
( W i n t e r 1984-85), 130.
D e c l i n e o f t h e Modern Age,"
465 K a r o l
S a u e r l and,
Einfhrung
( B e r l i n : W a l t e r de G r u y t e r , 1 9 7 9 ) , 1 1 .
466 I b i d .
in
die
Asthetik
T e l o s 62
Adornos
In the
possibility
for
false
true
reconciliation
reconcilfation
would
is
merely
467 Adorno,
A e s t h e t i c Theory,
282.
468 I b i d .
The i m p o r t a n c e o f r e c o g n i z i ng Adorno1s in s i s t e n c e t h a t a r t n o t
r e s o l v e t h e c o n t r a d i c t i o n s w i l l become c l e a r i n t h e Chapter 4
d i s c u s s i o n o f autonomous a r t v e r s u s a r t which has a f f i r m e d a
heteronomous i d e o l o g y .
469 Wol fgang Wel ch, Asthetisches Denken ( S t u t t g a r t : Phi 1 ipp
Reclam, 1993). 130-2. Wel sch a r g u e s strenuousl y agai n s t t h o s e who
would see A d o r n o ' s r e f e r e n c e t o t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f r e c o n c i l i a t i o n
as a n t i c i p a t e d i n a r t as ever o c c u r r i n g i n t h e p r e s e n t f a r frorn
r e c o n c i 1 ed world.
As
post-Enlightenment world.
qua
world.
Art in
"
In Hegel's sytem,
then, "beauty and truth are in one way the same. w1i3
Howeve r
472 G e o r g W i 1 helm F r i e d r i c h H e g e l , A e s t h e t i c s : L e c t u r e s on F i n e
A r t , Vol. 1, t r a n s . , T . M . Knox ( O x f o r d : C l a r e n d o n P r e s s , 1975;
r e p r i n t , 1 9 9 1 ) , 81.
473 I b i d . ,
111.
including philosophy.
went
one
step
further, in
that
he
Hegel , however ,
"historicized" art
and
The
far as what exists has existence in the Idea and the Idea is only
realized in this process, therefore this process is essential in
order for truth to exist.
474 Gethrnann-Si e f e r t , D i e
Funktion d e r Kunst i n d e r G e s c h i c h t e ,
261.
C7S I b i d .
476
Annemari e
Gethrnann-Si e f e r t ,
"Hegel
lt
These
vom
Ende
der
Hegel-Studien Bd. 19
spirit.
abstract
universality
and
particularity
are
not. ,,417
The
of art
actualizing and
unfolding of
the
And
as people and
times
change. so does
art.
Hegel
477 Hegel
Ibid.,
Aesthetics,
Vol
1 , 144.
299.
63.1
Hegel writes:
. .
..
In the art of
the
But. one must understand that Hegel honours Greek art as an art
frarne of reference would not find in that past art form an adequate
vehicle of truth for its own time.
380.
'O2
Hegel, A e s t h e t i c , Vol
1, 4 2 7 .
228.
for a
to
to determine
" I t is
as
of
provides. w 4 8 9
the
historical
specification
this
mediation
487 I b i d .
Ibid.
Gethmann-Si e f e r t ,
"
160.
the
228.
K a r s t e n H a r r i e s , "Hegel on t h e F u t u r e o f A r t ,
o f M e t a p h y s i c s 27 ( 1 9 7 4 ) : 689.
"
The R e v i e w
In the
In its individuality,
spirit finds its essence in itself and thus, overcomes its need for
its external particularity in the sensual form of art.
Through
this "liberation" from its need for particularity, its need for
art, spirit "wins for itself its infinity and absolute independence
228.
495 H e g e l ,
Aesthetics, V o l .
1, 481.
in i t s own province.
finite sensuous form of art and desires liberation from the form of
art, which, according to Hegel. it no longer needs.
Therewith externality is regarded as an indifferent element
in which spirit has no final trust or persistence. The less
the spirit regards the shape of external reality as worthy of
it [ L e . itself as spirit]. the less can it seek its
satisfaction therein a d attain reconciliation with itself
through union with it.8,
Spirit thus negates the negation in order to lift itself out of its
opposite, the finite, into something higher than the concrete form
of art. Spirit transcends the Ideal in concrete form in its search
for a form of truth higher than that provided by art; it seeks the
infinite, the Absolute.
In his
t h e s i s of
art?
What a r e t h e
the
w i l l e v e n t u a l l y b e no more?
a n t T a c t u a l i z a t i o n t l of
"invalidate o r
Any e f f o r t i n t h e p r e s e n t t o a t t e m p t
the Asthetik w i l l
reinterpret
this
basic
first
thesis.
have
to
either
i n Hegel's
l e c t u r e s one r e a d s of t h e d i s s o l u t i o n of t h e v a r i o u s forms of a r t .
Hegel b e l i e v e d t h a t i n h i s
Have w e r e a c h e d a p o i n t i n t h e h i s t o r y o f a r t
..
....
. .. -
...."
(1983), 23.
actions
and
We have
'O0
Hegel, A e s t h e t i c , V o l .
'O1
Ibid.,
1, 9 .
10.
Hegel notes:
In the
Gethmann-Siefert, has become "partial, " for in the modern world art
has becorne a phenomenon alongside of the phenornenon which mediates
truth: philosophy.
'O3
I b i d . , 10-11.
'O5
Gethrnann-Siefert,
208.
is
no
longer
of
world-
Thus,
However, in the modern p e r i o d , not only are there other forms, such
And
aestheticsn develops.509
Hegel did not predict. therefore, that art would be no more,
but rather that as the movement of spirit continues, and thus its
content changes, both the form and function of art as mediator of
the truth of spirit would also change.
'O6
Ibid., xlv.
"
239.
'O8
Gethrnann-Si e f e r t ,
'O9
Nor, to counter
Rather, art
remains one form among others which gives a "world-orientation." 510
Therefore, we cannot
There will be new forms of art, forms which would have had no place
and little or no meaning in a context prior to
- our own.
Ibid.,
239.
H e g e l , Aesthetics, V o l .
Adorno's
interest
in
aesthetic
theory
was
natural
He
turning Hegelianisrn's
"autonomy" d i f f e r s somewhat f r o m t h a t o f t h e i d e a l i s t s , i t i s
i m p o r t a n t t o n o t e t h a t Adorno b e l i e v e s t h e b e s t way f o r a r t t o
a v o i d b e i n g used f o r
a p u r p o s e i s t o remain u s e l e s s and
in a s s i m i l a b l e t o t h e p r e v a i 1 in g i d e o l o g y .
When a r t in s i s t s o n it s
tight
to
remain
autonomous,
it
foreshadows
"a
state
of
r e c o n c i 1 i a t i o n : t h a t c o n d i t i o n o f i n t e n t i o n l e s s b e i n g i n it s e l f
where t h i n g s w i 17 no l o n g e r be p r i z e d f o r t h e i r p r a g m a t i c value."
[ W o l i n, "The De-Aesthet ic i z a t i on o f A r t , " 1 2 0 . ]
Harding views
method,
is precisely
"of the
that
which
dialectical
overcome via
synthesis
into
the
whole,
for
Adorno
the
in ever more barbaric and undetected forms, the most urgent task of
dialect ical thought is " the preservation of the contingent and
particular against the eternal and allegedly universal. 519
tv
For Adorno, unlike Hegel, the repressed element of nonidentity is in fact not effaced in Aufhebung, "but first truly
comes
into i t s
own. m520
The
is
in
the
universal.
Through
the emphasis on
the
which
Adorno,
have
been
suppressed.
As
opposed
to
the
operate in
the
insists on
Art. which
the
has moved through history and sublimated al1 in its path. "Genuine
for Adorno
art, lis]
the
last
bastion
that
has
not
yet
I n d e e d . important
. . .pointhg
522 I b i d . , 193.
523 Hohendahl , "Autonorny o f A r t , " 144.
524 W. M a r t i n Ldke, "Der Kronzeuge: Ei n i ge Anmerkungen zum
V e r h a l t n i s Th. W. Adornos zu S . B e c k e t t , lf i n Theodor W. Adorno,
ed. Heinz Ludwig A r n o l d (Munich: t e x t + k r i t i k , 1977), 1 3 6 .
'*'
J a y , Adorno, 158.
The " c o g n i t i v e s t a t u s l t is a l s o r e f e r r e d t o as " c o g n i t i v e
f u n c t i on. " C f . Andrew A r a t o and E i ke Gebhardt , " A e s t h e t ic T h e o r y
of art in which Adorno found this force was the art of Samuel
Beckett precisely because, Adorno believed, Beckett had emphasized
his "renunciations of a philosophical claim . . . . "j2'
For Adorno.
the need for art has not been sublated by Absolute Spirit into
religion and philosophy , as Hegel concluded .
in the modern world, but art is perhaps "the only remaining medium
of truth. "
and philosophy. Art, "on the basis of its having incorporated the
moment
of
sensuousness into
the
framework of
its
cognitive
Al though
Adorno concedes that works of art cari never replace the tasks of
philosophical cognition, he recognizes the potential superiority of
'*'
527 W o l i n ,
"The D e - A e s t h e t i c i z a t i o n
of Art,"
117.
The Essentfa7
In contrast to conceptual
One might almost Say that truth itself depends on the tempo,
the patience and perseverance of lingering with the
particular: what passes beyond it without having first
entirely lost itself, what proceeds to judge without having
first been guilty of the iqrstice of contemplation. loses
itself at last in emptiness.
However ,
tf
aesthetic
experience
does
not
know
what
it
""'
untrue, any
attempted whole t r u t h
reconciliation.A32
As it is
Thu
comprehension, 535
fl
and
requires
interpretation.
Art
532 J a y ,
533 I b i d . , 92-3.
534 Adorno, A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 4 1 6.
Sernbl a n c e ,
Reconci 1 i a t i o n ,
207
"
93.
131.
of it.'j3'
accumulation
of
unresolved
tensions,
repressed
beneath
the
538 Adorno,
Negative D i a lectics, 3 2 0 .
11
541
And with the passage of time. the dialectic between the form of art
The
Adorno,
541 I b i d . ,
Hegel:
Three Studies, 8 3 .
137.
And
It is
moderne. "
543 I b i d .
H a r d i ng r e f e r s t o t h e ongoi ng t e n s i o n between autonomous
a r t w o r k s and t h e i r e m p i r i c a l r e a l i t y , a l s o n o t a u n i f i e d c o n t i n u o u s
h i s t o r y , as " a b i 1 a t e r a l s t a g g e r i ng o f t e n s i o n s s t r a i n i ng a g a i n s t
one a n o t h e r . "
[ I b i d . , 186.1
B. K u s p i t , T r i t i c a l N o t e s on A d o r n o ' s S o c i o l o g y o f
Art,"
The Journa7 o f Aesthetics and A r t Criticism
( S p r i n g 1975), 322.
544 Donald
Music
and
XXXIII.3
respond to
the apparent
Both must be
historical moment
manifestations.w M 6
for the creation of art which is relevant and thus speaks most
Adorno's cal1 for art to be
Aesthetic innovations
do not become fetishized. they are not fixed forms and genres.
aesthetic
innovation and
up-to-the-minute technical
Rather, the
artwork takes.
546 Snow,
Philosophy',"
the
"Introduction
to
Adorno's
'The
Actuality
of
115.
5L7 Hohendahl
"Autonorny o f A r t ,
" 137.
will not only speak through innovative form. b u t will also reveal
the rifts and crevices of that socio-historical disintegration
which it recognizes and will' not attempt to achieve a false
reconciliation.
As a
Instead of the
an anti-
concept
implies.rf551
The shocking
truth which
becomes
550 I b i d . ,
"
142.
137.
I f art
is a fait social and true harmony does not exist in reality, art
cannot be harmonious .'53
In it mirnesis -
art's function of
Those who create art are those "who have not been content to
make do with the world as it i ~ , " ~ who
"
have refused to be a
elements
and
Prisms, 1 5 2 .
The regrouped
of
the
illuminates contradictions.
in
new
"constellation"
light on the other, and the figures that the individual moments
form together are specific signs and a legible script."558
But to Say that art is a constellation is also to Say that art
is "not discursive and not biased.
11559
101.
Hege 7 : Three S t u d i e s , 1 0 9 .
..
..
..
appear as mere
nuances
562 Buck-Morss,
The Origin o f N e g a t i v e D i a 7 e c t i c s , 9 2 .
563 I b i d . , 9 8 .
564 Theodor W .
Adorno, " R a v e l " ( 1 93O), Moments Musicaux:
Neugedruckte A u f s a t z e , 1928 b i s 1962 ( F r a n k f u r t am Mai n : Suhrkamp,
1964), 69, c i t e d i n I b i d .
According to Wolin.
for
is
actually enhanced.~ 3 %
Explaining
the
The Terrns o f C u l t u r a l C r i t i c i s m , 7 1 .
theory.
art, ensures that art which is autonomous does not merely identify
with the rationality of the social order and copy reality as is making A b b i l d e r (copies) of reali t y .
Adorno insist
' identifying
Authentic
art does not merely accept the order of the way things are.
It
k t h e t i s c h e Denken, 1 1 9 .
actuality.570
However, authentic art is not merely the passive product of
mimesis.
subjective
of
form;
this
involves
rationality.
1t
Art
Form
and
contradictory
therefore
condition
is the unfolding of
[in a
truth-"
. . . [because]
1n contrast to
570 Adorno,
573 S a u e r l a n d , E i n f h r u n g i n d i e A e s t h e t i k A d o r n o s , 4 .
Thus. a l t h o u g h art
1n fact, it
of objectification." 5 i 6
too long
been
. .t h e
574 Wol i n,
'tThe D e - A e s t h e t i c i z a t i on o f A r t ,
"
1 18.
577 Adorno, A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 4 4 6 .
I n summary,
proposes Wiggershaus,
" [ n j e g a t i v e d i al e c t i C S
meant : be m i ndful o f t h e O t h e r .
.H y p o s t a t i z a t i o n s woul d never
succeed i n t h e l o n g t e r m , and t h e o n l y r e a s o n a b l e sol u t i o n must
t h e r e f o r e be t o r e c o g n i z e and a c c e p t t h e o b j e c t , t h e O t h e r , t h e
alien;
this
was
the
conclusion
of
Negative
D i a 7ectics."
[Wi g g e r s h a u s , The F r a n k f u r t Schoo 7 , 602. ]
..
the primacy of the object, he cannot deny and therefore, does not
deny the role of the subject: "But since primacy of the object
requires reflection on the subject and subjective reflection,
subjectivity - as distinct from primitive materialism. which really
does not permit dialectics
The
the object,
following the logic of the object, not irnposing its own ideas on
the object,
However, the
..
Adorno,
" S u b j e c t and O b j e c t ,
580 I b i d . , 5 0 7 .
Ibid.,
506.
"
503.
its particularity,
As the
If the subject
the "clairn of
Three S t u d i e s , 8 0 .
l t ~ e l f . " ~Yet
~ ~ only when ubject and object "must no longer be
thought of as opposite to one another, can true reconciliation
between them be
realized.
proposed
a medium
of
truth.
caused
by
their
""*
This
failure
results in an
585 I b i d .
586 Kager , H e r r s c h a f t und Versohnung, 4 3 .
587 Osborne,
"
33.
Ibid.
Adorno, i n f 1 uenced by Rosenzwi eg ' s The S t a r o f Redempt i o n , may
have had t h e f o l l o w i n g i n mind: " A r t remains p i e c e w o r k so t h a t life
m i g h t be and become a whole.
And t h u s , a r t i s an e s s e n t i a l
e p i sode. . . [ A ] mong e v e r y t h i ng Spoken, i t i s t h a t which should n o t
remain unspoken."
[Rosenzweig, The S t a r o f Redemption, 191 . ]
world as is.
subversive.
Reality in its present form is untrue, for i t does not equal its
Rather, the Schein (aesthetic
sublimated
work
otherwise.*"593
of
As
art
a
there
is
hidden
'it
should
be
refuses to be
By
590 I b i d .
591 Cahn, " S u b v e r s i v e Mirnesi S . " 4 8 .
592 Adorno,
593 Adorno,
"Cornmi t m e n t , " 31 7.
"
159.
595 Adorno, A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 4 4 6 .
Art,
hidden by
Convinced tha t
" ideology
correctly
the
truth
that
is
reconstellations of what
Negative D i a l e c t i c s , 172.
I n Chapter 4 1 w i l l d i s c u s s t h e s p e l l o f i d e n t i t y t h i n k i n g
more d e t a i 1, as well as a r t ' s r o l e in e i t h e r b r e a k i n g t h a t s p e l l
w o r k i n g as a t o o l t o p e r p e t u a t e t h e status quo o f t h e spe11
whose c o n t e x t i t i s c r e a t e d .
The comments h e r e i n t r o d u c e some
t h e arguments which w i l f be f u r t h e r developed i n t h a t C h a p t e r .
in
or
in
of
597 I b i d . , 347.
O r , as Adorno s t a t e s e a r l i e r : " I n t h e u n r e c o n c i Jed c o n d i t i o n ,
n o n i d e n t i t y i s experienced as n e g a t i v i t y . " [ I b i d . , 3 1 . 1
598 Adorno,
'O0
Snow,
"Introduction
P h i l o s o p h y , "' 1 1 5 .
to
Adorno1s
The
a vei 1
needs. "
A c t u a l it y
of
social reality.
.. .because
hated
. . . also
because
"the
Minima Mora 7 i a , 2 2 2 .
'O3
Adorno,
'O4
605 I b i d .
225
Reconci 1 i a t i o n ,
" 708.
of the gaps and chaos of reality. " [wlhat works of art really
demand from us is knowledge or, better. a cognitive faculty of
more than merely grasping the plot of the drama, the motivation of
the characters, or the subject rnatter of a painting; also involved
is addressing the intention of the work.
He explains how
experience;
it
is
inherent
in
that
experience.
This involves
being aware of the work of art in its context and how it responds
to that context. A work of a r t cannot be understood in isolation,
but must be understood in the context which determines it.
Even
work
elements,
perceived figures in
'O7
A e s t h e t i c Thheory, 22.
I b i d . , 475.
608 Buck-Morss,
226
the gaps in between. In art and in our speech become manifest "the
wounds and the scars of the gaps and the empty places. 1,609
The silent interval in music, the blind spot in painting, like
the silenced word in poetry, simultaneously with the audible
and the visible, construct the work of art.
Speech reaches that which can be said only if it wounds
itself on the unspeakable, the unspoken and the unutterable;
that which it fails to Say shimmers through the cracks and
crevices of what is said, in the blank gaps and empty lines
between the black letters, [and] in the silence can be heard
the speech as well as its acoustic ffiiling silent.
Speech is immanent in silence."
If we can become aware that reality as it is structured is not as
it should be, if we can recognize the significance in the gaps
one must
either bring the contrary course of the world into some sort of
harmony and against one's own better judgement, obey it, or, if one
remains loyal to one's own definition of the world, one "must act
I b i d . , 184.
Adorno,
227
as if the world's course did not exist and must perish by it. "612
which we then
reimpose on society.
To
impose the
given
the
post-Enlightenment age,
In spite of living
individual
and
appearance.
Ibid.
'13
Ibid.
'14
Ibid.
615 Rose,
'16
Adorno,
Negative D i a 7ect i c s , 3 4 4 .
I b i d . , 358.
228
therefore, untruth.
to
be
unaware
that
we
live
in
"world
that
incessantly
This is to refuse to
Quoting Hegel.
" I f 'thinking
'j8
Adorno,
...teaches itself
Hege7:
Three Studies, 6 4 .
I b i d . , 23.
W i ggershaus,
'*'
Hege 7 :
The F r a n k f u r t Schoo 7 ,
G . W . F . H e g e l , Logic/Encyc7opedia
T h r e e Studies, 64.
600.
1 , 20, cited i n Adorno,
1,622
Critical thinking maintains the tension between the world and its
concept; it is to insist on their non-identity. This is to think
against the grain of the dominant pattern of thought in the world
which
one
knows.
it
is
to
think
what
"is deemed
to
be
unthinkable.n623
the
human
part,
the
very
part
resisted
its
by
. . "625
-- -
8,
306.
Although he r e c o g n i z e s t h e power o f i d e n t i t y t h i n k i n g , Adorno
in s i s t s t h a t n o n - i d e n t i t y o r c r i t i c a l
thought
i s always a
p o s s i b i 1 it y .
"EN] O m a t t e r t o what e x t e n t t h e mind i s a product o f
t h a t t y p e , i t impl i e s a t t h e sarne t i m e t h e o b j e c t i v e p o s s i b i l i t y of
[Adorno, Prisms, 25. J
overcomi ng it "
625 I b i d .
hopes can art make way for the possibility of true hope.
" [ I ] n the
from
that
judgements
otherness.. . .\N'bat
is
that
art
everything
is
. . .says
not
in
just
where one refuses to accept that what is, is al1 that could be.
In the end, hope, wrested from reality by negating it, is the
only form in which truth appears. Without hope, the idea of
truth would be scarcely even thinkable, and it is the cardinal
untruth. having recognized existence to be bad. &I present it
as truth simply because it has been recognized.
145.
I b i d . , 207.
I b i d . , 404-5.
629 A d o r n o , M i n i m a Mara7iaS 98.
231
In
this unreconciled world, " [aJ rt will live on only as long as it has
the power to resist society. If it refuses to objectify itself, it
becomes a commodity.
With
reference
to
that
does art maintain the negative moment, its ability to stand its
ground and resist society, does it negate the chaotic order of its
social-historical context, or does it construct an alternative, or
630 Adorno, A e s t h e t ic T h e o r y , 322.
I b i d . , 321.
632 I b i d . , 2 2 .
633 I b i d . , 59.
n638
be
It
called
i
its
religious
(or perhaps
theological)
Prisms, 21.
636 Adorno,
"The A c t u a l it
y o f P h i 1 oophy,
"
120.
They must be
For they are only the indictment of the concrete reality which
determines their opposition.
For Adorno.
If they no longer
and religion is lost, for both have lost their relationship with
truth.
639 Buck-Morss,
lt
6c2 Theodor W .
Adorno,
"Cornmitment,
F r a n k f u r t Schoo 7 Reader, 31 7.
tt
in
The
Essentia7
"The
art, 1 will examines his view that authentic art resists being used
to affirm
reality, since
art
. . .cannot be
attacks those who would wish to use it; in its refusa1 to bear a
message, art refuses to accommodate itself to the world around it.
If, however, the question to be asked is how art "stands in
relation to the underlying antinomies in society: whether music
[art] confronts them, overcomes them, leaves them as they are or
indeed hides them,'A4' then one must also ak how art which is
committed to an ideology counter to the s t a t u s
ideology compares with autonomous art.
quo
or dominant
the
If Adorno
646 Adorno,
Prisrns, 21.
himself , gives , such as the dramatic art of Sartre and Brecht. The
religious art
in
this
Adorno
empirical
[ reality]. "647
creation of art is the negative tension between the work of art and
its specific historic moment, or the non-identity of the work with
that moment.648
Be
Grohotolky,
A - s t h e t i k d e r N e g a t i o n - Tendenzen des
deutschen Gegenwartsdrarnas, 27.
A s t a t e m e n t which Adorno makes r e g a r d i n g t h o u g h t i n M i n i m a
M o r a l i a i s e q u a l l y t r u e f o r autonomous a r t : " " F o r t h e v a l u e o f a
t h o u g h t i s measured by i t s d i s t a n c e f r o m t h e c o n t i n u i t y o f t h e
f a m i 1 i a r . It i s o b j e c t i v e l y devalued as t h i s d i s t a n c e is reduced;
t h e more it approximates t o t h e p r e - e x i s t i ng s t a n d a r d , t h e f u r t h e r
i t s a n t i t h e t i c a l f u n c t i o n i s diminished, and o n l y i n t h i s , i n i t s
m a n i f e s t r e l a t i o n t o i t s o p p o s i t e , n o t i n it s i s o l a t e d e x i s t e n c e ,
a r e t h e c l a i m s o f t h o u g h t founded. " [Adorno, Minima Mora 7 i a , 8 0 . ]
647
A w o r k o f a r t i s l i k e i n t e r p r e t i v e p h i losophy, f o r t h e y
l f c o n s t r u c t k e y s , b e f o r e w h i c h r e a l it y s p r i n g s open. A s t o t h e s i z e
o f t h e key c a t e g o r i e s , t h e y a r e s p e c i a l ly made t o o r d e r . " [Adorno,
"The A c t u a l i t y o f P h i l o s o p h y , " 1 3 0 . 1
Wel sch , A s t h e t i s c h e Denken, 125.
Xnherent in the
rationality.
rescuing the elements of reality from their reified state and reordering them.
and that means that the concrete historical situation, art's other,
is their condition.w651
of reality.
the expression of the untruth" of its context and art "really only
exists as long as it is impossible by virtue of the order which it
transcends.
Adorno, Aesthetic T h e o r y , 3 2 8 .
Ibid.
~
i n The C u 7 t u r e
653 Adorno, T h e Schema o f Mass C ~ l t u r e , 'chap.
Industry, 6 7 .
I n h i s c r i t i q u e o f M a r x i s t a e s t h e t i c s , Marcuse expresses a
s i m i l a r view t o Adorno:
e v e r y a u t h e n t i c work o f a r t would b e
r e v o l u t i o n a r y , i . e . , s u b v e r s i v e o f p e r c e p t i o n and u n d e r s t a n d i n g , an
in d i c t m e n t o f t h e e s t a b l ished r e a l it y , t h e a p p e a r a n c e o f t h e image
o f 7 ib e r a t i o n . " [ H e r b e r t M a r c u s e , The A e s t h e t i c dimension: Toward
". . .
their context? If such art accepts and copies the framework of its
origins, then instead of lodging a critique, it becomes a means to
the ends of the ideology of its social-historical moment.
of
of
'"
Stravinky'
qua
In fact.
...and to
It refers to the
the rationalization
The
relationships
in
reality
by
with
the
657 Adorno,
"Culture
Cu 7 t u r e I n d u s t r y , 87.
industry
reconsidered,
" chap.
in
The
658 D a v i d H e l d , I n t r o d u c t i o n t o Critical T h e o r y ( C a l if o r n i a :
U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a Press, 1 9 8 0 ) , 9 1 .
A r t c r e a t e d a s such, i s, a c c o r d i ng t o Barzun, t h e meaning o f
t h e phrase ' a r t f o r art's s a k e ' today.
" A r t f o r a r t ' s sake
1 it e r a l 1y means a r t made because t h e r e is a g u a r a n t e e d consumer t o
take i t i n .
. It is a r t made and d i s t r i b u t e d because a r t i s an
i n s t i t u t i o n o f t h e s t a t u s quo, t h e b r e a d and b u t t e r o f thousands t o
whom it means - b r e a d and butter. " [ B a r z u n , The Use and Abuse o f
A r t , The A.W. M e l l o n L e c t u r e s i n t h e F i n e A r t s , 1973, The N a t i o n a l
Ga1 1 e r y o f A r t , Washi n g t o n D. C. ( P r i n c e t o n :
ri nceton U n i v e r s i t y
P r e s s , 1973), 137.1
..
freedom."'j9
happiness
the goals
As
of
the Enlightenment
in
this
and
understanding
with
the
subsumption
of
the
Subsumptive or instrumental
659
662
J .M.
Industry, 4.
Bernstein,
llIntroduction,"i n A d o r n o ,
The
Cu7ture
conceptual
realm ....
[and
its]
purpose
..As
to
allow
for
The
Ibid., 4-5.
665 Ibid., 8.
lose its possibility of effect, but its very existence as well. ,,669
Adorno refers to the example of cultural festivals which ought to
be celebrated as they corne and not organized only for the sake of
making
sure
they
do
not
overlap
with
one
another.
When
. . . [it] rationalizes
T u l t u r e a n d Adm i ni s t r a t i o n , "
in
The
667 I b i d . , 100.
668 I b i d . ,
93.
I b i d . , 94.
670 I b i d . ,
102.
A contemporary e x a m p l e of such admi ni strative control and
b a n i shment o f t h e f e s t i v i t y from a cultural c e l e b r a t i o n o c c u r r e d i n
criticism of cultural
"
Ado r no
administration's
heteronomous impositions:
culture - no matter what form it takes - is to be measured by
norms not inherent to it and which have nothing to do with the
quality of the object, but rather with some type of abstract
standards imposed from without, while at the same time the
administrative instance - according to its own prescriptions
and nature - must for the most part refuse to become involved
of the
in questions of immanent quality which regard th~~fruth
thing itself or its objective bases in general.
via
programmed
O n t a r i o i n 1993.
P r o v i n c i a l c i v i l s e r v a n t s w e r e s e n t memos
i n d i c a t i n g t h a t i n o r d e r n o t t o o f f e n d m i n o r i t i e s who d i d n o t
c e l e b r a t e C h r i s t m a s , t h e r e were t o be no C h r i s t m a s t r e e s i n t h e i r
o f f ices and no c a r d s w i t h e x p l i c i t C h r i s t m a s messages on t h e i c
S a n t a Claus was f i n e and they were a l lowed t o w i s h one
d e s ks
a n o t h e r ''Season ' s G r e e t ingsm and "Happy Ho1 idays. "
671 I b i d . , 98.
672 I b i d .
673 Adorno and H o r k h e i m e r ,
D i a 7ect i c o f En 7 i g h t e n m e n t ,
131
246
t hem.6i5
has
been
"Zweckmassigkeit mit
Zweck! "
value,
phrase
becomes:
Kant's
the
successful
mode1 .
conceivable
Every
individuality
is
" s u b o r d i n a t e d to one end and subsumed under one false formula: the
The inherent
obedience to the s t a t u s
quo.
imperative proclaims:
The culture
" C u l t u r e i n d u s t r y reconsidered,
678 Theodor
Industry, 166.
W.
Adorno,
"
86.
"Free
tirne,"
chap.
in
The Cu7ture
industry's
such
is
C O ~ S C ~ O U S ~ ~679S S . Adorno
r1
..
that
concludes
that
in
has
light
replaced
of
the
Once a g a i n .
the masses.
means to
Say
anything, to
"To be pleased
it
about
is shown. . . .The
far more subtle and effective ways than the crude methods of
domination practised in earlier eras . . . . [ The culture industry has
an] ability
to
Adorno,
"A P o r t rai t o f
Adorno,
"On
t h e F e t i s h C h a r a c t e r i n Music and t h e
R e g r e s s i on o f L i s t e n i ng , " i n The Essentia 7 Frankfurt Schoo 7 Reader,
283.
682 Adorno and H o r k h e i m e r , Dia 7 e c t i c
o f En 7 ightenment, 144.
behaves when he affirms that the real is right. how much more
~
who
capacity to use the machinery falls to t $ ~ person
integrates himself with it uncomplainingly ....
Once under the influence of the culture industry, not only
does choice no longer matter because everything is programmed to
meet
Adorno
individuals.""
Instead
of
independent
and
individuals
his readers forget that human beings are subjects. and as such
"still represent the ultimate limit of reification."
In contrast
beings J
'"
cannot
wholly
Adorno,
"On t h e F e t i h
Regressi on o f L i s t e n i ng, " 286.
685 Adorno,
be
grasped
Character
in
after
Music
all. ,687
and
the
"Ohne L e i t b i Id,l 1 3 4 5 .
686 Adorno,
"On t h e F e t i h C h a r a c t e r i n Music and t h e
Regressi on o f L i s t e n i ng, " 273.
Horkheimer a l so lodges a harsh c r i t i que a g a i n s t t h e presumabl y
a u t o m a t i c c h o i c e s consumers so e a s i 7 y make:
"The p a t t e r n s o f
t h o u g h t and a c t i o n t h a t p e o p l e accept ready-made from t h e a g e n c i e s
of mass c u l t u r e a c t i n t h e i r t u r n t o i n f l u e n c e mass c u l t u r e a s
though they were t h e ideas of t h e p e o p l e themsel ves. " [Horkheimer,
Ec 7 i p s e o f Reason, 1 5 4 . ]
687 Adorno, "The Schema o f Mass Cu1t u r e , " 8 0 .
Adorno emphasises a hope based on t h e i n d i v i d u a l as the
" u l t i m a t e 1 i m i t o f r e i f i c a t i o n ; " Horkheimer is more c a u t i o u s : "The
At
the heart of
the
masses.
The
accessory
is
to
accomplish
of
one
of
the
cultural goods
which
must
be
made
Art which
objection t h a t t h e i n d i v i d u a l ,
despite everything,
does n o t
e n t i r e l y d i s a p p e a r i n t h e new impersonal
institutions,
that
i n d i v i d u a l is m i s as rugged and rampant i n modern s o c i e t y as e v e r
b e f o r e , seerns t o m i s s t h e p o i n t . The o b j e c t i o n c o n t a i n s a g r a i n o f
t r u t h , namely, t h e c o n s i d e r a t i o n t h a t man i s s t i l l b e t t e r than t h e
w o r l d he 1 ives in.
Y e t h i s 1if e seems t o f o l low a sequence t h a t
H is
wi11 f i t any q u e s t i o n n a i r e he i s asked t o f i 1 1 o u t .
in t e l l e c t u a l e x i s t e n c e is exhausted i n t h e pub1 ic o p i n i on p o l 1S .
Especial 7 y t h e so-ca71ed g r e a t in d i v i d u a l s o f today, t h e i d o l s o f
t h e masses, a r e n o t genui ne in d i v i d u a l s, t h e y a r e s i mpl y c r e a t u r e s
of t h e i r o w n pub1 ic i t y , en1 argements o f t h e i r own photographs,
f u n c t i o n s o f s o c i a1 p r o c e s s e s .
[Horkheimer, Ec7ipse o f Reason,
159.1
688 J i menez,
Theodor W.
Adorno,
1Z 8 f f .
689 Adorno,
.. .
does not corne into conflict with reality becomes merely "an
extension of the outside world.
tt690
Rather than
sustains."691
"appearance of
society, of
describing
institutions and
w e l l , o n l y s e r v e s as a r o m a n t i c d e c e p t i o n .
It t r a n s f i g u r e s t h e
w o r l d i n t o one i n w h i c h c o n f l i c t i s s t i 1 1 p o s s i b l e r a t h e r t h a n
r e v e a l i n g it a s one i n w h i c h t h e o m n i p o t e n t power o f p r o d u c t i o n is
b e g i n n i ng e v e r more o b v i o u s l y t o r e p r e s s such a p o s s i b i 1 it y .
It i s
a
del i c a t e
question
whether
the
1i q u i d a t i o n
of
aesthetic
i n t r i c a t i o n [ s i c ] and development r e p r e s e n t s t h e 1 i q u i d a t i o n o f
every l a s t t r a c e o f r e s i s t a n c e o r r a t h e r t h e medium o f it s s e c r e t
o r n n i p r e ~ e n c e . ~ [' I b i d . ]
I n l i g h t of o t h e r comments Adorno makes
r e g a r d i n g a r t as t h e l a s t p l a c e o f r e f u g e f o r t h e u t o p i a n i m p u l s e ,
I would s i d e w i t h t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f t h e a e s t h e t i c as " t h e medium
o f [ r e s i s t a n c e ' s ] s e c r e t omni presence.
690 H e l d ,
691
Introduction t o C r i t i c a 7 T h e o r y , 94.
692 Rose,
The
its ability
to
remove
"the thought
that
there
is
any
think beyond the parameters of the reality one has come to know.
In this process, art also becomes reified, for it is viewed as
a thing equal to its market or "exchange" value.
Autonomous art,
on the other hand, fights this process; it does not accept reality
as i t is, including the reality of i t s own exchange value.
Nor
The culture
....
693 B e r n s t e i n , " I n t r o d u c t i o n ,
i n Adorno,
The C u l t u r e Indutry,
9.
694 I b i d . ,
9.
into
consumer. "696
lubricant
for
the
system
. ..calculated
for
the
museum
one
can
enjoy
art
in
state
of
Cpon entering
"artificial
chap.
in
..
D i a lectic o f E n l i g h t e n m e n t ,
126.
In the patronage
the
emancipation
significance
and
from
the bonds
difficulty
of
of
art's
achievement of autonomy:
Having dissociated itself from religion and its redemptive
truths, art was able to flourish. Once secularized, however,
art was condemned, for lack of any hope for a real
alternative, to offer to the existing world a kind of solace
that reinforced the fetters autonomous art had wanted to shake
off. There is a sense in which the principle of autonomy is
itself solace of this k i n d , for in claiming to be able to
posit a we11-rounded totality entirely on its own, the
principle of artistic autonomy willy-nilly creates the false
impression that the world outside is such a rounded whole,
too.
By rejecting reality - and this is not a form of
escapismOQut an inherent quality of art - art vindicates
reality.
When freed from integration by the bonds of patronage, the autonomy
700 Rose,
'O1
Held,
The M e l a n c h o l y S c i e n c e ,
116ff.
I n t r o d u c t i o n t a C r i t i c a l Theory,
84.
of art became possible, but not easy. Once autonomous, art could
no longer offer the "hope for a real alternativen - the theological
hope for redemption - and yet art found itself in a position where
it still had to offer a kind of solace; as a fait social, art
cannot escape its ties to its social-historical moment.
However,
in German)
of
the
In art's
Art keeps
exiting societywio4
and especially in a society, for whom (as we
will discuss in Chapter 5), for the most part, reality is no longer
703 I b i d . , 3 .
70c Leo L o w e n t h a l , Das B i 7 d des Menschen i n der L i t e r a t u r e
( N e u w i ed: L u c h t e r h a n d , l966), 1 4 f , c i t e d in Marcuse, The A e s t h e t i c
D i m e n s i o n , 75-6, n . # 6.
to
insist
unarticulated
be the case that one might buy a work of art purely because one
finds it beautiful. On the other hand, Bernstein's suggestion may
be naive, ignoring such hidden motives as attaining the prestige
that cornes with owning a certain piece of art, as well as with the
recognition of being wealthy enough to have been able to spend a
great deal of money t o make it one's own "property."
The dominant
to
Adorno gives
9.
Marcuse a l so acknowl edges t h a t t h e economi c s t r u c t u r e s o f t h e
c a p i t a l i s t systern a s s e r t t h e m s e l v e s even i n t h e realrn o f a r t .
V h e y d e t e r m i n e t h e use v a l u e (and w i t h it t h e exchange v a l u e ) of
t h e works b u t not what t h e y are and what they say." [Marcuse, The
A e s t h e t i c Dimension, 31 ( i t a 7 iC S m i n e ) . ]
Character
in
Music
and
the
another example:
The consumer is really worshipping the money that he himself
has paid for the ticket to the Toscanini concert. He has
literally 'made* the success which he reifies and accepts as
an objective criterion, without recognizing himself in it .
But he has not 'rnadfi' it by liking the concert. but rather by
buying the ticket.
originality.
Autonomous art
must
work
at
I b i d . , 278-9.
O r as Adorno s t a t e s l a t e r i n t h e same essay: "The woman who
has money w i t h w h i c h t o buy i s i n t o x i c a t e d by t h e a c t of b u y i n g . "
[ I b i d . , 279.1
'O9
Adorno,
A e s t h e t ic Theory, 323.
."
influences
in the
v i s - - v i s an u n f r e e s o c i e t y .
o f A r t , " 112.J
Harding,
"Hi s t o r i c a l
[ c f . Wolin,
In his
"The D e - A e s t h e t i c i z a t i o n
D i a l e c t i c s and t h e Autonomy o f A r t ,
184.
B a r z u n e x p l a i n s some o f t h e m i s f o r t u n e s o f a t t e m p t s t o make
a r t a t o o l o f engagement: I f U n f o r t u n a t e l y r e v o l u t i o n a r y a r t t e n d s t o
be s t r o n g i n message and weak i n a r t .
A l 1 the great revolutions
s i n c e 1789 have g i v e n a r t encouragement, b u t e v i d e n t l y n o t o f t h e
r i g h t k i nd o r n o t t o t h e r i g h t a r t i sts. Propaganda a r t has proved
i n e f f e c t u a l as a r t , and t h e e x c e p t i o n s have c o n f i r m e d t h e r u l e by
b e i n g i n e f f e c t u a l as propaganda, t h e message b e i n g l o s t i n t h e
[ B a r z u n , The Use and Abuse o f A r t , 9 4 . J
excitement o f the a r t .
In
fact, Adorno blames the Fascist regime in Gerrnany for "some of the
most terrifying anti-cultural phenornena of our tirne.
He refers
..
. .
713 Adorno,
"What
41 4 .
Ibid.,
417.
. . .Their
of art, for when the idea of compelling and objective truth in art,
"the idea of humanism," was lost sight of a vacuum was created,
"ready to
absorb
totalitarianism.
the arbitrarily
superimposed
doctrines
of
the youth who has lost touch with the importance of the tradition
of German music is easily swept away with Hitler:
The German boy of our age who has no longer heard, as his
father rnight have, the Kreutzersonata played by friends of his
parents, and
who
never
listened
passionately
and
surreptitiously when he was supposed to go to bed, does not
merely miss a piece of information or something which might be
recognized as being educational. The fact that he has never
been swept away emotionally by the tragic forces of this music
bereaves him somehow of the very life phenomenon of the
humane. It is this lack of experience of the imagery of real
art, partly substituted and parodied by the ready-made
stereotypes of the amusement industry, which is at least one
of the formative elements of that cynicism that has finally
transformed,t,.he Germans, Beethoven's own people, into Hitler's
own people./ i l
Adorno is quick to clarify that this by no means indicates that the
musical culture of Germany died, rather, under Hitler, it became a
museum piece. The crucial aspect remains that the "tie between the
idea of humanism, of music as an art, and the actual outward and
inward life of the people, was definitely broken. This is the most
essential characteristic of the musical climate for Fascisrn in pre-
I b i d . , 418-9.
I b i d . , 419.
717 I b i d .
Nevertheless
laments Adorno.
the
propaganditic
of
"a
Ibid.,
420.
I b i d . , 424.
720 I b i d . , 4 2 6 - 7 .
that "thoughts can never be much more than one of the materials for
art. "725
totality.
Adorno
would
deny al1
the
721 I b i d .
R2 I b i d . , 426-7.
I n h i s A e s t h e t i c Theory Adorno m a i n t a i n s t h a t p h i l o s o p h y i s t o
blame f o r t h e tendency t o make a r t i n t o a s o c i a l f u n c t i o n a r y : "Ever
s i n c e a r t began t o corne w i t h i n t h e p u r v i e w o f p h i l o s o p h i c a l
t h o u g h t , p h i losophy has tended t o s i nk below a r t by t r y i n g t o r i s e
above i t , s p e c i f i c a l l y by handing a r t o v e r t o t h e powers t h a t be.
Ifone seeks t o d e f i n e t h e p l a c e o f a r t t o d a y , one must o f c o u r s e
I t i s however o n l y too
l e a v e t h e c o n f i n e s o f a e s t h e t i c s p e r se.
easy t o a s s i g n t o a r t a s o c i a l f u n c t i o n f r o m an i m p e r i o u s and
t h e r e f o r e f a c i l e vantage p o i n t . Those who engage i n t h i s e x e r c i s e
t e n d t o d i smiss a r t ' s immanence o f f o r m as b e i n g n a i v e and selfd e c e p t i v e . They a r e c o n t e n t w i t h ' s o c i a l f u n c t i o n ' , as though t h i s
were a l 1 t h e r e i s t o a r t
[Adorno, A e s t h e t i c Theory, 338. ]
."
723 Adorno,
724 I b i d .
725 Adorno,
"Cornmi tment
,"
305.
of art. nor should that work "be judged in the light of them."i26
the "cultural
Say
something.
of
the c u l t u r e
around
them
and
its
dialectic of
form and
expression." i 2 8
The plays
are rnerely
AS
a result.
728 I b i d . , 305.
1 w i l l examine A d o r n o ' s response t o B r e c h t ' s a r t i n t h e n e x t
s e c t i o n o f t h i s in v e s t i g a t i o n .
729 I b i d .
both the emotion and the thesis are disavowed. Sartre's plays do,
nevertheless, have a solid plot.
And,
The danger
730 I b i d .
" [ T l h e h i s t o r y o f attempted u n i o n between a r t and p o l i t i c a l
regeneration
is
that
of
total
m i s u n d e r s t a n d i ng,
radical
i ncompati b i 1it y , and t r a g i c f a i l u r e . From Bloc and Mayakovsky down
t o P a s t e r n a c k a n d Anna Akhmatov ( t o Say n o t h i n g o f t h e meanderings
o f Gide, S a r t r e and o t h e r w e s t e r n e r s ) , t h e s t o r y o f r e v o l u t i o n a r y
a r t is one o f s h a t t e r e d i 1l u s i o n s . " [Barzun, The Use and Abuse o f
A r t , 143.1
731 Adorno,
"Cornmi tment ,
306.
732 I b i d . , 313.
M a r t i n L u t h e r King,
Jr.
was aware o f t h i s p o s s i b i l i t y
happening i n t h e C i v i 1 R i g h t s Movernent. I n a r e c e n t documentary o f
h i s 1 i f e , he was quoted as s a y i n g t h e f o l fowing remarks t o e n s u r e
h i s rnovement d i d n o t " s l i t h e r [ ] i n t o t h e abyss o f i t s o p p o s i t e " :
" T h i s is where o u r p o s i t i o n o f n o n - v i o l e n c e w i 7 1 h e l p us n o t
t o seek t o r i se from a p o s i t i o n o f d i sadvantage t o a p o s i t i o n o f
advantage, t h u s s u b v e r t i n g - j u s t i c e . "
" W e w i l l n o t s u b s t i t u t e one t y r a n n y f o r a n o t h e r . "
" B l a c k supremacy i s as dangerous as w h i t e suprernacy."
[ M a r t i n L u t h e r King, Jr. (Xenon V i deo I n c . , 1994) 1
irksome social
explains
ills .wi33
Adorno,
"is
not
Committed
art
intended
to
in
the
generate
proper
ameliorative
propagandist art.
sense
That is
fundamental attitudesn and " renders the content to which the artist
commits himself inherently ambiguous. " i 3 5
In order to
A e s t h e t i c Theory,
734 Adorno,
349.
735 I b i d.
C l e a r l y , f o r Adorno t h e r e i s a d i f f e r e n c e between p o l i t i c a l l y
committed a r t and a r t which i s propaganda.
"Even i f p o l i t i c a l l y
m o t i vated, " he concedes, "cornmi t m e n t in it s e l f remai ns po1 i t ic a l 1y
p o l y v a l e n t so l o n g a s i t is n o t reduced t o propaganda, whose
p l iancy
mocks
any
commi trnents
by
the
s u b j e c t . l1 [Adorno,
"Cornmi tment , 301 -2.1 It appears h e r e t h a t Adorno means p o l it i c a l
commi tment can rernai n indetermi n a t e in it s p o l y v a l ency
When
reduced t o propaganda, however, p o l y v a l e n c y i s exchanged f o r a
determi n a t e f u n c t i o n and v i ew p o i n t . B u t can one 1o g i c a l 1y have a
work o f a r t which i s p o l i t i c a l l y commi t t e d and y e t a l s o i n s i s t on
it s indetermi n a t e - p o l y v a l e n t - c h a r a c t e r ? Autonomy i s presupposed
i n a r t ' s a b i l i t y t o i n d i c t i t s c o n t e x t and i t s a b i l i t y t o remain
i n d e t e r m i n a t e , t h u s s c o r n i ng t h o s e who would w i s h t o use i t . T h a t
much we have heard b e f o r e .
But h e r e Adorno p r o p o s e s t h a t a r t can
be indetermi n a t e , o r p o l y v a l e n t , and a l so p o l it ic a l 1 y c o m m i tted.
If,
as
Adorno
states,
committed
art
slides
towards
the
" p r o c l iv i t i es o f t h e a u t h o r , " [Adorno, "Commi t m e n t , " 3 0 4 . ] t h e
p o l y v a l e n t n a t u r e w i 11 a l s o s l i d e t o w a r d t h e p o l i t i c a l l e a n i n g o f
t h e a u t h o r ; p o l y v a l e n c y w i 11 be reduced t o t h e o p i n i o n o f t h e one,
t h e author.
O t h e r t h a n t h e need t o o f f e r a d i s t i n c t i o n between
p o l it i c a l 1y c o m m i t t e d and propagandi s t a r t , t h e r e appears t o b e a
c o n t r a d i c t i o n h e r e in Aaornot s t h e o r y .
736 Adorno,
A e s t h e t ic Theory,
368.
opposite: domination.737
737 L e g i s l a t i o n which, f o r example, d e r i v e s from a d e s i r e f o r
emancipation, a l s o q u i c k l y t u r n s i n t o t h e t o o l o f domination.
For
example, t h e Employment E q u i t y A c t w h i c h became 7aw i n O n t a r i o i n
September 1994 a r o s e o u t o f a d e s i r e t o ensure equal employment
o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r women and m i n o r i t i e s , i n an a t t e m p t t o r e d r e s s
p a s t i n j u s t i c e s . However, what r e s u l t e d was a c o n t i n u a t i o n o f t h e
c o e r c i v e p a t r i a r c h a l system o f t h o u g h t which assumes t h e " w h i t e
m a l e M as t h e s t a n d a r d and anyone e l s e as " o t h e r . "
I d e n t it y
t h i n k i ng becarne rampant: d i f f e r e n c e s were n e u t r a l ized i n s i m i 1 a r i t y
and f l a t t e n e d i n t o t h e c a t e g o r i e s o f Mwoman,M "person w i t h a
d i s a b i 1 it y , '' " r a c i a l m i n o r i t y ,
and " a b o r i g i na1 person. "
Thi s
" t y r a n n y o f c a t e g o r i es, " [Adorno,
P r i s m s , 6 1 . ] 1i q u i d a t e d t h e
d i f f e r e n c e s between in d i v i d u a l s and t h e i r c a t e g o r i e s . Whi 1e by no
means a homogenous movement, common t o t h e many streams o f femi n i sm
i s t h e d e s i r e t o work t o w a r d t h e ernancipation o f t h e oppressed.
When w o r k i n g towards t h i s g o a l , however, i t i s c r u c i a l n o t t o
f o r g e t t h e p a r t i c u l a r in d i v i dual s u f f e r i ng under t h a t o p p r e s s i on.
I n d e e d , t h e r a d i c a l s u b v e r s i v e p o t e n t i a l o f feminisrn i s undermi ned
when t h e sol u t i on o f f e r e d on1 y p e r p e t u a t e s t h e p a t t e r n o f subsumi n g
t h e in d i v i d u a l under a dominant way o f t h i n k i n g . What was proposed
as a s o l u t i o n " t o r i g h t t h e wrong o f u n j u s t i c e s [ s i c ] o f t h e p a s t ,
becomes i t s e l f a r i g i d dogma w i t h no c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e
c o n t i ngenci es o f in d i v i d u a l s .
A n d once a person has been
c a t e g o r i z e d , t h e t a s k o f t r a n s f o r m i ng [ t h a t p e r s o n ] i n t o a t h i ng i s
imrnensely s i m p l i f i e d . " [ R i c h a r d L. Rubenstein,
The C u n n i n g o f
H i s t o r y : Mass Death and t h e A m e r i c a n Future (New York: H a r p e r and
Row, W i S ) , 5 4 . ] T h e t a s k s o f d o m i n a t i o n and f u r t h e r o p p r e s s i o n by
plays, the decisions can be extracted and used for any p u r p o s e even those of the mortal enemy.
Adorno states that art does not provide knowledge of reality "from
a particular perspective.
fli39
In the dialectic
738 Adorno,
739 Theodor W.
"O
Adorno,
Adorno,
"Reconci 1 ia t i on Under D u r e s s ,
"Commi t m e n t ,
"
31 7 .
"
162.
lvid2
If a work of art
to
302.
742 Adorno,
743 I b i d .
7A4 Marcuse,
745 I b i d .
746
Ibid.
767 I b i d . ,
32.
ome
of his p l a y s .
AS
we will
.An
748 Adorno,
749 Marcuse,
750 I b i d . ,
3.
Under such c i r c u m s t a n c e s , works o f a r t , l i k e p e o p l e , must be
made " t o bend, t o conform, i n o r d e r t o s u r v i ve. " [Kager, H e r r s c h a f t
und Versohnung, 9 9 . ]
U n f o r t u n a t e l y, a c c o r d i n g to Barzun, " [ w ] hen
. . t h e a r t i s t is t o l d t h a t o n l y c e r t a i n forms o r t e c h n i q u e s match
t h e p h i l o s o p h y o f t h e regime, t h e end o f a r t is i n s i g h t . "
[Barzun, The Use and Abuse o f A r t , 95.1
B r e c h t h i m s e l f n o t e s t h e extreme t o w h i c h t h e P a r t y i n t h e
S o v i e t U n i o n t o o k t h e i r c o n t r o l o f a r t : "It i s t a k e n as d e l i b e r a t e
i f t h e name S t a l i n does n o t appear i n a poem. " [ W a l t e r Benjamin,
T o n v e r s a t i ons w i t h B r e c h t , " in R e f 7ections: Essays, Aphorisms,
A u t o b i o g r a p h i c a 7 W r i t i n g s , ed. , P e t e r Dernetz,
t r a n s . , Edrnund
J e p h c o t t ( N e w York: H a r c o r t Brace J o v a n o v i c h , 1978; Schocken Book
e d i t i o n , W 8 6 ) , 213. ]
I n a l a t e r c o n v e r s a t i o n , Benjamin r e v e a l s
t h a t B r e c h t himsel f w r o t e a " S t a l i n poem, e n t i t l e d 'The Farmer t o
H i s Oxen' , . . [ w h i c h ] d i d indeed pay t r i b u t e t o S t a l i n
who i n h i s
[ B r e c h t ' s ] v i ew had immense meri ts. " [ I b i d . , 21 5. ]
According to this
the truth
of art."'''
Marcuse
counters with the argument, however, that "[ilf art 'is' for any
collective consciousness at all, it is that of individuals united
in their awareness
of
the universal
need
for liberation -
not
even
the
proletariat,
Marx's
'universal
class ' . "jS3 One cannot masure art's progressive character by the
ideological horizon of the artist's class. Rather, t h e "criteria
for the progressive character of art are given only in the work
In
itself as a whole: in what it says and how it says i t . ,,754
fact, Marxist aesthetics, "has yet to ask: What are the qualities
of art which transcend the specific social content and form and
'"
Marcuse,
752 I b i d . , 3 1 .
753 I b i d . ,
16.
754 I b i d . ,
19.
"CC
recognizes
tht
the
be a factor in
changing the world," easily becomes its opposite "if the tension
between art and radical praxis is flattened out so that art loses
its own dimension
for change."i56
Conflict
glorifying
and
absolving
the
existing
society.1,758
inherent
I b i d . , 15.
756 I b i d . ,
35.
757 I b i d . ,
37.
Ibid.,
11.
759 Adorno,
A e t h e t i c Theory, 1 95.
272
understand the logic of its form, but also the opposite: the
discontinuities and ruptures, the rifts and crevices manifes t in
that form, to grasp the contradictions and to understand what they
mean.
Just as i t was
In its
Adorno, "it is still better for art to fa11 silent and stop in its
"O
I b i d . , 336.
Ibid.,
371.
tracks than to run over to the enemy, promoting the trend towards
assimilation to the all-powerful
s t a t u s quo. ,, 762
Because
it
is
for art to Say something and cause a determinate effect, art which
is subversive in its refusal to communicate, is written off as
esoteric and elitist .
forces
which
explode
the
normal
universe
of
762 I b i d . , 442.
Barzun d i s c u s s e s what happened t o a r t i s t s who abandoned t h e i r
p o s i t i o n and adopted a M a r x i s t a e s t h e t i c i n R u s s i a . "Between 1914
and 1920 u n t o l d nurnbers o f g i f t e d a r t i sts and t h i n k e r s p e r i shed o r
1 o s t t h e i r w i 11 t o c r e a t e .
The s u r v i v o r s who f l o c k e d t o t h e
Communist P a r t y were seeking a cause w i t h which t o r e a n i m a t e t h a t
w i 11 and r e s t o r e a b e l i e v a b l e f u n c t i o n t o a r t . T h i s p l a u s i b l e s t e p
was t h e b e g i n n i n g a g r e a t c o n f u s i o n .
The r e v o l u t i o n a r y a r t i s t ,
f o r m e r l y a l o n e f i g h t e r w i t h a self-made program, n o w obeyed a
d o c t r i ne, a n d k e p t h i s eye on h i s f o l l o w e r s and m a s t e r s as well a s
h i s d i s t a n t Mecca. The s t u f f and style o f r e v o l u t i o n a r y a r t c o u l d
no l o n g e r be advanced and d i f f i c u l t , b u t rnust s u i t t h e rnind and
c o n d i t i o n s o f t h e masses. " [ 8 a r z u n , The Use and Abuse o f A r t , " 70. ]
763 Adorno,
"Cornmi trnent
303.
Not
Al though such
..
766 Adorno,
422.
"What
'l
persons in fact argue that art should show its opposition to "the
world of destruction, terror and sadism
..
,
by going
"sounds Hitlerian.
"and
expresses a general
reversion of
thinking
which
goes
infini tely beyond the sphere of the arts - and hatred of thinking."
This "hostility against the development of independent thought is
what makes for Fascism. "i68
accusation of
and
his
action nor did we support the actions of those who felt themselves
inspired by critical theory. w'69
767 I b i d .
Ibid.
769 Theodor W .
I n d u s t r y , 173.
Adorno,
"Reignati on,
"
chap.
in
The
Cu7ture
in mere theatre. v i i o
through undiminished
insight. ""l
And
as
for
the charge
of
al1
770 I b i d . ,
174.
771 I b i d . ,
173.
772 I b i d .
Adorno ends t h i s essay w i t h t h e f o l l o w i n g : "Whoever t h i nks i s
w i t h o u t anger i n a l 1 c r i t i c i sm: t h i n k i ng s u b l irnates a n g e r . Because
t h e t h i n k i n g person does n o t have t o i n f l i c t anger upon h i m s e l f , he
This
f u r t h e m o r e has no d e s i r e t o i n f l i c t i t upon o t h e r s .
happiness v i s i b l e t o t h e eye o f a t h i n k e r i s t h e happiness of
The u n i v e r s a l tendency t o w a r d s u p p r e s s i o n goes a g a i n s t
manki nd.
t h o u g h t as such. Such t h o u g h t is h a p p i ness, even where unhappi ness
t h o u g h t achi e v e s
h a p p i ness
in
the
expression
of
p r e v a i 1 s;
unhappiness.
Whoever r e f u s e s t o p e r m i t t h i s t h o u g h t t o be t a k e n
[Ibid., 175.1
f r o m h i m has n o t r e s i g n e d . "
773 I b i d . ,
77f I b i d .
174.
Thaidigsmann
777 Adorno, A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 1 8 1 .
Adorno r e f e r s t o K a f k a as one a r t i s t who c r i t i c i s e d t h e
monopol y
domi n a n t ide01 ogy o f h i s s o c i o - h i s t o r i c a l moment
capitalism
without d i r e c t l y a r t i c u l a t i n g protest.
" Y e t by
z e r o i n g i n on t h e dregs o f t h e a d m i n i s t e r e d w o r l d , he l a i d b a r e t h e
i n h u m n i t y o f a r e p r e s s i v e s o c i a l t o t a l i t y , and he d i d so more
p o w e r f u l ly and uncornpromi s i n g l y t h a n i f he had w r i t t e n n o v e l s about
c o r r u p t i o n in mu1 t i n a t i o n a l c o r p o r a t i o n s . "
The key, d e t e r m i nes
Adorno, i s t o b e found i n t h e f o r m o f K a f k a ' s a r t : '*The exposure
[ o f t h e u n i v e r s a 1 b l i n d n e s s o f s o c i e t y ] is b r o u g h t a b o u t by Kafkat s
language.
I n h i s n a r r a t i v e t h e b i z a r r e i s as normal as i t i s i n
s o c i a l r e a l it y . If [ I b i d . , 327-8.1
"Sirni l a r l y ,
a
non-tendentious
work
1ike G o e t h e ' s
The
S u f f e r i n g s o f Young Werther p r o b a b l y had a c o n s i d e r a b l e i m p a c t on
t h e emanci p a t ion o f bourgeoi s c o n s c i ousness in Germany. The n o v e l
focuses on t h e problem o f t h e c o l l i s i o n between s o c i e t y and t h e
i n d i v i d u a l who i s d r i v e n to s u i c i d e out o f a f e e l i n g o f u n r e q u i t e d
looked backed to see the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah and was
turned into a pillar of salt.
"In such a
to any
alternatives, and
under
existing
love.
I n t h i s work Goethe p r o t e s t e d e f f e c t i v e l y a g a i n s t p e t t y
b o u r g e o i s r i g i d i t y , w i t h o u t e x p r e s s l y naming i t . " [ I b i d . , 3 5 1 . ]
778 T h a i d i gmann, "Der B l ick der Er1 osung, " 51 1
i79 I b i d .
780 I b i d .
not
to
confirm
"'*'
structure.
them
by
Alternatives
deciding
within
their
coercive
..,intimations of utopia
. . .because
they
harbour
demands for unity and general assent, demands that in turn generate
regulatory practices that must be adhered to for a defined way of
life to be realized.rv 782
And to manipulate a work of art as an instrument of protest
neutralizes any critical stance that the work of art might have
taken.
When art
782 H e w i t t ,
C r i t i c a 7 Theory o f R e l i g i o n ,
221.
. . . .By
L ~ h e i l ,)
forces.
But detachment
not possible.
784 Adorno,
A e t h e t i c T h e o r y , 27.
785 I b i d .
Ibid.,
188.
"No work of
It
criticised Adorno had hoped. Only when art "holds fast to what it
is in itself
. . . [can it]
787 A d o r n o ,
M i n i m a Mora7ia, 2 4 7 .
788 A d o r n o , A e s t h e t i c Theory, 1 9 5 .
Ibid.
Adorno,
M i n i m a Mora 7 i a , 2 2 4 - 5 .
282
betrayal of Tt. art can only be the mute voice of the longing for
the other. "jg2
Adorno
states:
right
condition. as
in
the
Jewish
theologoumenon. al1 things would differ only a little from the way
they are; but not even the least can be conceived now as it would
be then.
enigmatic character
"deals a
blow
. . . to the
792 I b i d .
24.1
is
A e t h e t i c Theory, 344.
By "concentrating
is converted
"into a
i s thy
victory? , 798
Unlike Proust are artists "who think that the content of their
"
These artists, in
Although it is unfair to
say that Adorno expresses only disdain f o r the works of Brecht, the
majority of what he has to Say about the man and his art is
undeniably pe jorative.
theory of autonomous art cornes into conflict with Brecht, who was
open about the influence of his political commitment on his art and
theory of art. As we will note, conflicts also aross in Adorno's
relat ionship wi th Benjamin because of the influence Benjamin's
friendship with B r e c h t
had on h i s
thought.
This triangular
"
682.
Adorno, A e s t h e t i c Theory, 4 0 .
have
tanks. "*O3
While
Adorno criticises
the
Aphorism, A u t o b i o g r a p h i c a 7 W r i t i n g s , ed.
P e t e r Demetz, t r a n s .
Edrnund J e p h c o t t ( N e w Y o r k :
H a r c o u r t B r a c e Jovanovich,
1978;
Schocken Book e d i t i o n , l986), x i v. ]
The arguments between Adorno and B e n j a m i n , as well as the
i n f l u e n c e s o f Benjamin on Adorno go beyond t h e scope o f t h i s
p r e s e n t d i s c u s s i o n ; t h e y w i 7 1 o n l y be r e f e r r e d t o here i n so f a r a s
t h e y r e l a t e t o t h e work o f B r e c h t .
( C f . Buck-Morss' The O r i g i n o f
N e g a t i v e D i a 7 e c t i c s , an e x c e l lent s t u d y o f t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between
t h e t h o u g h t o f Adorno and B e n j a m i n . )
'O1
Adorno,
A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 322.
'O3
Ben j a m i n ,
R e f 7ect i o n s , 193.
'O4
"Brechtt s
Threepenny
Nove7,"
chap.
in
I b i d . , 194.
for whom
an
age
cannot h e l p but
without
history
is
an
As
named
Arturo
Ci, who
heads
up
an
Fascism, portrayed
as
an
'resisted' at will."
This
806 Adorno,
807 I b i d .
287
157.
With
in the answer.. . .
Benjamin finds
In this,"
'OB
Ibid.
'O9
Adorno, A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 3 4 9 - 5 0 .
Aesthet i c T h e o r y , 344.
288
199.
and Brecht was certainly too astute not to have noticed that. His
impact might
converted.w812
Nevertheless,
because
Brecht
"wanted
to the
to
be
Brecht, who uses his own art for political purposes, also
approaches the works of others in a utilitarian manner,
For
may
He
is not able tu appreciate Kafka's works of art as art with beingfor-self, but only in so far as they can be a means for his ends.
812 I b i d .
813 I b i d .
F u r t h e r p r o o f f o r Adorno ' s argument r e g a r d i ng B r e c h t ' s
a u t h o r i t a r i an t e n d e n c i es and techniques o f domi n a t i o n is the f a c t
t h a t B r e c h t can a c c e p t t h e d i c t a t o r s h i p w h i c h he r e c o g n i zes a s
b e i ng " i n power o v e r t h e p r o 1 e t a r i a t " i n Russia.
" W e must a v o i d
d i s o w n i n g i t , " s t a t e s B r e c h t , " f o r a s l o n g as t h i s d i c t a t o r s h i p
sti 1 1 does p r a c t i c a l w o r k f o r t h e p r o l e t a r i a t
t h a t i s , as l o n g as
it c o n t r i b u t e s t o a b a l a n c e between p r o l e t a r i a t and p e a s a n t r y w i t h
a preponderant regard f o r p r o l e t a r i a n i n t e r e s t s .
[Benjamin,
Adorno,
i n contrast,
is
" C o n v e r s a t i o n s w i t h B r e c h t , " 219. ]
vehementl y a g a i n s t any s o r t o f d i c t a t o r s h i p ; even a benevol e n t
d i c t a t o r cou1 d e a s i ly " s l i t h e r [ ] i n t o t h e abyss o f i t s o p p o s i t e . "
Demetz,
"Introduction,
"
i n R e f lections, x x x i i
Adorno would a p p r e c i a t e t h e s t u n t e d o n e s .
For
importance and i g n o r e d ,
the stunted
tree trunk
acknowledged, "was
under
the
s t rong
(which i t i s
influence
of
~ r e c h t " * Benjamin
~~)
e c h o e s t h e B r e c h t i a n d e n i a l of t h e l i b e r a t i o n
of things - a r t i n p a r t i c u l a r - from b e i n g u s e f u l .
Benjamin speaks
815 B e n jami
n, V o n v e r s a t i on w i t h B r e c h t , fl 207.
"*"
As
worries whether "in view of all his previous work, but especially
its satirical art and above al1 threepenny Novel - he would find
acceptance with the public for this work [a philosophical, didactic
poeml ,
In his political
fury,
Brecht
unashamedly exploits
the
they might
regard
for what
be
as
". .
Benjarni n,
T o n v e r s a t i o n s w i t h Brecht,
"
21 1
819 I b i d .
"[W] e cannot e n t i r e l y u n d e r s t a n d Benjami n t s p a r t i c u l a r b r a n d
o f M a r x i sm w i t h o u t l o o k i ng more c l o s e l y a t h i s c r e a t i v e f r i e n d s h i p
w i t h t h e playwright B e r t o l t Brecht, a r e l a t i o n s h i p very 1i t t l e
a p p r e c i a t e d by e i t h e r Schol e m o r Adorno. " [Demetz, " I n t r o d u c t i o n , "
i n R e f iections, v i ii - i x . ] Gershorn Schol em, f o r exampl e, " c o n t i n u e s
t o s u g g e s t i n h i s memoirs t h a t h i s r e s t l e s s f r i e n d [ B e n j a m i n ] was
a r e l i g i o u s i f n o t a m y s t i c a l t h i n k e r who rnay have been tempted,
a g a i n s t t h e g r a i n o f h i s sensi b i 1 i t i e s , t o superimpose t h e t e r m s o f
Marxi s t d i scourse upon h i s metaphysi c a l v i s i o n o f God, 1anguage,
and a s o c i e t y o n t o l o g i c a l l y i n need o f s a l v a t i o n . "
[Ibid., v i i i . ]
fascist. etc.
By ubsuming under
He explains, f o r
Such a combination
it
02' I b i d . ,
199.
822 I b i d .
823 Adorno,
824 I b i d . ,
"Cornmi t m e n t ,
" 306.
306.
293
validity. 1,825
Nevertheless, Adorno does recognize that Brecht is a good
poet.626and that he has contributed significant new techniques to
theatre of
developed
the
effect) as
pychology.
Speci f ically ,
Brecht
alienation
This alienation
Ibid.
826 Adorno,
827 I b i d . ,
A e s t h e t i c Theory,
117.
349-50.
828 A c c o r d i n g t o B r e c h t i a n a c t i n g t e c h n i q u e , even t h e a c t o r i s
t o a v o i d i d e n t i f y i ng w i t h t h e c h a r a c t e r , p r e s e n t i ng t h e emotions o f
t h e c h a r a c t e r as i f s t a n d i n g b e s i d e t h a t c h a r a c t e r ,
always
c o n s c i o u s o f him or herse1 f as t h e a c t o r . The a c t o r t h u s p r e s e n t s
t h e c h a r a c t e r t o t h e audience, c o n s c i o u s l y mai n t a i n i ng an a e s t h e t i c
d i stance; t h e a c t o r does n o t become t h e c h a r a c t e r .
U n f o r t u n a t e l y, even B r e c h t i an t e c h n i q u e s have been overused
t h e o r i es
present
certain
and
become
familiar:
"Brecht ' s
d r a m a t u r g i c a l c h a l 1 enges, perhaps most s i g n i f i c a n t 1y t h e f a c t t h a t
h i s ideas may have been t o o s u c c e s s f u l 1 y i n t e g r a t e d i n t o Western
t h e a t r e p r a c t i ce: many o f t h e t e c h n i q u e s ( e p i s o d i c s t r u c t u r e ,
fragmented s c e n e r y , 1ack o f a f r o n t c u r t a f n, v i s i b l e 1 i g h t i n g
e q u i pment , d i r e c t address) d e v e l oped by Brecht f o r a c h i e v i ng
d i s t a n c i a t i o n i n h i s e p i c t h e a t r e have become such f a m i 1i a r p a r t s
o f Our t h e a t r i c a l t r a d i t i o n t h a t w e do n o t even see them anyrnore.
Most Western t h e a t r e s p e c t a t o r s have accepted t h e s e c o n v e n t i o n s and
a r e s t i 11 ab1 e t o c l i n g doggedly t o an e m p a t h e t i c a t t a c h r n e n t t o t h e
c h a r a c t e r s . " [ L i nda M i 1 es, 5 p l it S u b j e c t Techni que f o r a Femi n i s t
Good Person: A Dramaturgi c a l Study, " Theatre T o p i c s : Dramaturgy,
Performance Studies, Pedagogy 5 . 2 (September 1995), 153.1
As we
w i 11 note i n Chapter 5 , t h i s ernphasises t h e need f o r a r t t o
c o n t i n u a l l y r e c r e a t e it s e l f , c o n t i n u a l l y c r i t i q u i n g t h e t r a d i t i o n
" t o dispense
its
resistance to
stronger."831
We
theses as "important not for what they say but for what they do:
of
w h i c h has corne b e f o r e i t .
829 Adorno, A e t h e t ic T h e o r y , 3 4 4 .
830 I b i d . , 4 7 .
831 I b i d . , 3 4 4 .
832 I b i d . , 349-50.
obscure.
itself
from
the
framework
of
its
context
and
in
that
longer maintains
to
critique, for
in
its
adoption of
that
mode
of
"The dilemma
corrective change.
one feminist
theatre participant.
i.
of course." as tated by
"how to
integrate art
and
conclude with
I will
cornmitment
pertains
to
the
art
of
theatre.
and c u l t u r e .
lf
tradition of theatretf
rather than "art" because the issues with which feminists deal in
the art
form itself.
The
established theatre tradition has followed the patterns of maledominated culture. where funding for theatre is male-dominated.
most theatre directors are male, and even the assumption that the
spectator perspective is male.
834 P a t t i
P.
G i 1 l e s p i e l Verni n i st Theatre: A
Rhetorical
Phenomenon, " Q u a r t e r 7y Journa 7 f o r Speech 6 4 . 3 ( 1 W 8 ) , 2 8 6 , ci t e d
in
"The
Rhetorical
and
Political
Foundations
of
Women's
C o l l a b o r a t i v e T h e a t r e , " J u d i t h Z i v a n o v i c , i n Themes i n Drama I I :
Women i n T h e a t r e , S e r i e s ed. James Redmond, (Cambridge: Cambridge
Uni v e r s i t y P r e s s , l989), 21 0 .
for
For, "[tjheatre, as
the staging of
forces
of
oppression.w83i
While there
may
be
as
many
836 C y n t h i a
Runni ng-Johnson,
"Femi n i ne W r i t i ng
Theatrical other,"
i n Redmond,
Themes i n D r a m a I I :
Theatre, 183.
and
it
Women i n
the
theatre.
Each f o r m o f feminism and o f t h e a t r e c a n b e s t u d i e d i n
r e l a t i o n t o the i d e a t h a t ' f e m i n i s t t h e a t r e f i s i t s e l f a f o r m o f
c u l t u r a l r e p r e s e n t a t i on in f 1 uenced by changes in t h e geographies o f
feminism,
women's
studies,
economics,
politics,
and c u l t u r a l
studies. "
[ L i z b e t h Goodman, Contemporary F e m i n i s t t h e a t r e s : To
Each Her Own (London and New Y o r k : Routledge, l993), 2-3. ) As w e
wi11 n o t e , one o f t h e f a c t o r s o f t h e i n s t a b i l i t y o f t h e term
" f e m i n i s t t h e a t r e " i s t h e e v o l u t i o n o f ferninism i t s e l f .
839 Goodman,
Conternporary Fernin i s t T h e a t r e s , 4 .
speci f ic reasons .
"*"
And in the
raising.
audience aware that " [tlhere have never really been women in
theatre. . . . [Rather,] women are only projections of male desire.
Women
have
never
participated
""' In f a c t .
representation.
841 I b i d . ,
actively
in
theatrical
4.
842 I b i d .
843 I b i d . , 8 .
D o l a n , " F e m i n i s t s , Lesbians, and Other Women i n
T h e a t r e : Thoughts on t h e P o l i tics o f Performance," i n Redmond,
Themes i n D r a m a I I : Women i n T h e a t r e , 199.
The e d i t o r s o f t h e book U p s t a g i n g B i g Daddy c l e a r l y s p e l 1 o u t
t h e i r p o s i t i o n on t h i s i s s u e i n t h e o p e n i n g paragraph o f t h e i r
I n t r o d u c t i o n : "The canon [ o f cl a s s i c a l drama] as it now s t a n d s was
844
Ji11
the
entire
exchange
between
performers
and
spectators
perspective and
makes
it
The
women
" through
the
his torically
male
This
gaze. 846
...
of
in
theatre,
84 Dolan, "Femi n i t s ,
199.
8d6 I b i d .
847 I b i d .
Lesbians,
Ir
Ibid.,
202.
849 I b i d . ,
199.
Kate L u s h i n g t o n ,
l'Notes t o w a r d t h e d i a g n o s i s o f a c u r a b l e
Canadian T h e a t r e R e v i e w 43 (Surnmer
P r o o f o f t h e d i s a d v a n t a g e d s i t u a t i o n o f female a c t o r s i s fcund
i n a study o f t h e s i t u a t i o n o f p r o f e s s i o n a l t h e a t r e i n Canada
between 1978-81. T h i s s t u d y found t h a t 83% o f t h e a t r e d i rectors
were male and o n l y 13% were femal e. [Ri n a F r a t i c e l l i , The S t a t u s o f
Women i n C a n a d i a n T h e a t r e , a r e p o r t prepared f o r t h e S t a t u s o f
Women Canada, J u n e 1 9 8 2 , i n I b i d . , 9.1
traditional
of
theatre's
"notion of
Wany
performer-spectator
roles-852
Of ten
spectator-
has
Once
you've got them on, you can't take them off and the whole world
looks dif ferent.n856
Rather,
there has been a noticeable trend which has stretched across the
continuum from the very radical to the more moderate.
The move by women to form their own troupes and highlight the
experiences of women in the mid to late twentieth century was
preceded by other women, who in the early part of this century,
were also involved in performances influenced by women's issues.
There were, for example, the amateur civic theatre and pageant
performances for explicit political purposes.
In 1914 NeIlie
McClung, for example, wrote and produced Votes for Men, a satire of
theatre of this first wave was didactic and fuelled by anger and
protest.
Indeed
these plays
banners ,,,858
[For]
As a
858 C h a r l o t t e Keatl e y ,
L e s b i a n s and o t h e r women i n t h e a t r e ,
''
replaced with happenings and " fusing the conventions of art with
those of real l i f e ~ ' in
~ ~ the form of docurnentary art.
There was
"Frorn
Forrnalisrn t o
862 I b i d .
Many o f t h e p r a c t i t i o n e r s o f f e m i n i s t t h e a t r e i n t h e 1960s and
1970s g o t t h e i r s t a r t i n a v a n t - g a r d e and l e f t i s t t h e a t r e companies
"Whi 1e t h e s e o r g a n i z a t i ons p r o v i ded mode1s o f how
o f t h e p e r i od.
t h e a t e r m i g h t in f 1 uence and speak t o ' p o l it i cal
purposes, t h e y
'persona1 '
issues
evidenced a s t r i k i n g in d i f f e r e n c e t o t h e
s u r r o u n d i ng p a t r i a r c h a l o p p r e s s i o n . Consequently, femi n i sts o f t e n
found themsefves a t odds w i t h t h e s e groups when i t came t o e a r n i n g
r e c o g n i t i o n f o r t h e i r c o n t r i b u t i o n s and p r o d u c i n g p l a y s t h a t would
d e a l w i t h women's e x p e r i e n c e s . " [ S u l l i v a n , "Women, Woman, and t h e
A s a r e s u l t , many female d r a m a t i s t s ,
S u b j e c t o f Feminisrn," 1 3 . 1
commi t t e d t o t h e women ' s movernent m i g r a t e d f rom t h e avant-garde
t r o u p e s t o t r o u p e s s p e c i f t c a l 1 y dedi c a t e d t o t h e femi n i s t cause.
laying
down
theatre.
work
""'Paddy
that
has
been
so
prevalent
in
committed
earnest
theatre' . "866
and
humourless* -
in
a word.
'propaganda
however, to be expected.
thefr
criticism
more
on
the
power
structures
underlying
by
deconstructionism, had
. . . the dominant
as
its
"only possible
ideology it deconstructs.
In effect, it
has been that while the staging of oppression might initially seem
to "raise consciousnessw about the oppression of women, in fact it
the
oppressed.n 811
The
status
quo
may
now become:
deconstruction?
"why
does
the
have
The question
been
the
To portray
This
reversal
"frustrates
the
mystifications
of
"
morality,
64.
871 I b i d .
872 I b i d .
873 Sue-El1 en Case,
"Introduction, "
P e r f o r m i n g Feminism:
Feminist
Critical
Theory
and
Theatre,
ed. Sue-EIlen
Case
( B a l t i m o r e : The Johns H o p k i n s U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1990), 1 0 .
challenges the colonization of her body, and denies the use of her
sexuality as
commodity
pornography , n 874
To
have
in
the
markets
marriage
and
questions
the
of
woman-as-subject
...to
re-
write the received mythic heritage that women believed had been
corrupted and distorted by patriarchal culture."875
A further shift bas occurred beyond the discovery and creation
o f positive
This s h i f t
involves
t1876
Feminists
you silence the voice. You have to search for the appropriate form
"
65.
..
* .
"873
drama.
Traditional
women are there, but they tend to be the supporters or the blockers
of some male action.
between women's public and private lives underlines the rubric that
"the personal is political."
"*"
Rather. b y putting
Drarna o f
F a c t s and
F i c t i o n on t h e
"
more subversive for in this role she not only speaks, she also
Even with the mildest of messages, the woman playwright "is bound
to be seen as an anomaly, if not an actual threat . Who knows what
she will s a y once she gives voice?~~'~
At
the same time, however, not al1 feminist theatre even uses
Many
the cultural apparatus which values high art and 'drama' the form
is particularly accessible to women.fl 884
Feminist theatre is, however. not beyond criticism. Those who
have been "successful"have been criticised for mainly working with
"established pieces. "
These groups
There
is
often
also
still
the
criticism
that
. . .defendhg
feminist
theatre
rather than using the same energy to create something new. .886
Reflecting on feminist theatre, Suzanne Lacy claims that "one of
the lessons of the last 10 years is that raising consciousness
doesn't necessarily bring political change. so it behooves artists
""'Indeed.
to engage in political
47.
action.
out.
Adorno calls for the enigmatic in art, which, like a puzzle. cannot
easily be figured out. feminist theatre. especially in its earlier
phase, attempts clear communication.
Although Adorno
In contrast, feminists in
positive reference
888
Person,"
Miles,
152.
''Split
Subject
Technique
for
. . .used
Feminit
Good
'
lt
207, n . 2 .
A r i a n e Mnouchkine, d i r e c t o r o f t h e T h t r e du S o f e i 7 in P a r i s ,
c l a r i f i e s h e r r e g a r d f o r B r e c h t ' s i n f l u e n c e on h e r t e c h n i q u e s . She
" d e s c r i b e s B r e c h t as a master w i t h whom one must be c a r e f u l , and
a c c o r d i n g l y d i s a s s o c i a t e s herse1 f f r o m h i s a u t h o r i t a r i an a s p e c t s :
'1 l i k e him w h e n he searches, b u t 1 d o n 7 l i k e h i m when he
1e g i sl a t e s .
[ A r i ane Mnouchki ne in t e r v i ew w i t h A d r i an K i e r n a n d e r ,
i n Kiernander,
A r i a n e Mnouchkine a n d t h e T h t r e du So7ei7
(Cambridge: Cambridge U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1993), 142, c i t e d i n Sarah
B r y a n t - B e r t a i 1 , "Gender, Empi r e and Body P o l i t i c a s m i se en Scne:
Mnouchki n e t s Les A t r i d e s ,
Theatre Journa7 46.1 (March 1 9 9 4 ) , 3. ]
Janel 1 e
Rei ne1t , "Rethi n k i n g
Brecht:
D e c o n s t r u c t i on,
Feminism and t h e P o l i t i c s o f Form," u n p u b l i s h e d paper, 1990, c i t e d
in Goodman, Contemporary F e m i n i s t Theatres, 20.
'"
Miles,
" S p l i t S u b j e c t Technique f o r a F e r n i n i s t Good
Person,
154.
A l t h o u g h acknowledging t h e same i n h e r s e l f , M i l e s is a l s o
c r i t i c a l o f " t h e gender p o l i t i c s i m p i c i t " i n B r e c h t . M i l e s r e f e r s
s p e c i f i c a l l y t o B r e c h t ' s p l a y "The Good Person o f Sichuan," where
B r e c h t a s s o c i a t e s "goodness w i t h femi n i n i t y a n d s t r e n g t h w i t h
mascul i n i t y .
[ I b i d . , 156.1
Following Brecht * s
892 I b i d .
893 H a l e , " A Dialectical
Feminist Fringe," 8 2 .
Drama o f
F a c t s and F i c t i o n on t h e
However
"directly
One
could
the human
physical element
in
theatre
is a
potential
1s A t t i t u d e ,
real world.
'l8"
In an attempt to
1f
Adorno
Other,
l1
Runni ng-Johnson,
180.
"Femi n i s t
W r iting
and
1
reponse t o a p e r f o r m a n c e w h i c h A r i a n e Mnouchkine
d i r e c t e d , L i nda W i n t e r w r i t e s , " t h e performance succeeds in s p i t e
o f Mnouchkine's femi n i s t out1 ook because good t h e a t r e overcomes
f e m i n i s t dogma. " [ L i nda W i nter, "The S p l e n d i d Pageantry o f Greek
T r a g e d y , " New York Newsday ( 6 O c t o b e r 1 9 9 1 ) , 1 1 , c i t e d i n B r y a n t B e r t a i l , "Gender, E m p i r e and Body P o l i t i c as M i s e en Scne," 28.1
899 Adorno, Aesthetic T h e o r y , 2 7 .
Ibid.
*for the sake of a higher social truth," is to make art reach for
something which it cannot, for something beyond the realm of
subjective experience.
the art form to fit an external meaning. missing the fact that the
external meaning is the nonartistic irreducible element in art and
falling into the trap of the domination they so mucb want to
subvert - art becomes a means to their ends rather than a being-
subscribe to
the same
repressive
Ibid., 188.
In s u p p o r t of A d o r n o f s position, one could also highl ight t h e
'O3
within one's
The act of
the
conditions
domination.
that
produce
leaving
in this case
To accept the
as a "ferninist c r i t i c a f
theory [which] also begins w i t h t h e
assumption t h a t w e have no s t a n d p o i n t o u t s i d e o f d o m i n a t i o n and
a l i e n a t i o n f r o m w h i c h t o t h e o r i z e . W e o u r s e l v e s speak from w i t h i n
conditions o f a l i e n a t i o n already given t o us, mediating n o t o n l y
our c r i t i c a l knowledge b u t o u r v e r y mode of b e i n g i n t h e world."
[ H e w i t t , Critical Theory o f Reiigion, 114. ]
'O4
Hewitt,
authority
against
which
he
[sic]
rebels. 905
Since
this
impact
that results
is peripheral
or, worse,
historical moment
- through
the
'O5
119 [ c f .
for e x p l a n a t i on o f t h e c o n t e x t o f t h i s q u o t a t i o n ] .
'O6
Adorno,
'O7
Ibid.
A e s t h e t i c Theory, 343.
320
n o t e 128
As
we11, in
light of
his own
emphasis
on
the
Bowever,
'O8
Teresa de L a u r e t i s ,
<'The Technology
of G e n d e r , " i n
Techno7ogies o f Gender ( B I oomi n g t o n : I n d i ana U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s ,
19875, 2 6 , c i t e d i n S u l l i v a n , "Wornen, Wornan, and t h e Subject o f
Femi n i sm,
"
U p s t a g i n g B i g Daddy, 2 8 .
still
Adorno would
'O9
322
question
whether
flexibility
and
ideology
are
not
indeed
incommensurate terms.
theatre project-
Adorno's
in mind
opposition
to
the
insistence
dominant
that
ideology
even
an
ideology
already
in
indicates
is
it
possible
Only
the
I b i d . , 212.
I b i d . , 237.
''*
Adorno,
"Cornmi t m e n t , " 3 0 4 .
323
Only art
which
according
to Adorno's
to
society.
'13
I b i d . , 317.
411
ART
AND
liELIG1ON
- - -ILPTEZR
AUSCHWITZ
325
As w e
noted. according to
not . "'16
the
existent. 11 911
915 Buck-Morss,
916 Adorno.
917
A e s t h e t i c Theory,
109.
by perrni s s i o n . )
J u n e 1993. (Used
Adorno condemns; now the focus will be on the flip side of his
Aesthetic Theory, examining art which, concentrating on being art,
Adorno praies
agendas
have
investigation.
nothing
to
do
with
the
Such intentions
purpose
of
this
And
Beginning w i t b
920
Intitute
Conternporary A r t .
for
Contemporary
Church
Their research,
Architecture
and
to note
that
'*'
F o r exarnpl e , t h e c u r r e n t D i r e c t o r o f t h e I n s t i t u t , P r o f .
D r . H o r s t Schwebel , was a student o f Adornor s at t h e U n i v e r s i t y of
F r a n k f u r t i n t h e 1960s.
Schwebel ' s w r i t i ngs o f t e n e i t h e r r e f e r
d i r e c t l y t o Adorno o r o t h e r s i n t h e F r a n k f u r t S c h o o l , such as
B e n j a m i n , o r i n d i r e c t l y i n t h e arguments w h i c h he p u t s f o r t h .
1
w o u l d 1i ke t o e x p r e s s my a p p r e c i a t i o n t o P r o f . D r . Schwebel f o r
g r a n t i n g me p e r m i s s i o n t o c a r r y out research i n t h e research
l i b r a r y a t t h e Institut d u r i n g t h e f a 1 1 o f 1 9 9 5 , as well a s f o r h i s
encouragement o f my work.
922 Ldke,
" D e r Kronzeuqe,
"
142.
one
As well,
beings over other human beings, for him more central was the root
of this domination in the Enlightenment: the domination of nature
which led to the domination o f one human being over another, the
irrationality of modern rationality and the return of enlightenment
to myth. Adorno frequently made reference to the arguments he and
Horkheimer had made in t h e i r Dialectic of Enlightenment in his
discussion of Beckett.
that which is, artists and their art, such as that of Samuel
'*'
136-149.
Marcuse,
"Der
Beckett, remain loyal to those who are without hope. Beckett's art
manifests
the
unbearable
contradictions
that ,
in
Adorno ' s
The plays
and novels of Beckett grow out of and "deal wth a highly concrete
historical reality: the abdication of the subject. Beckett's Ecce
heeds Adorno's
Beckett
. it would
Ibid.
"Cornmi t r n e n t
31 4 .
As
be
"more
In the
"To Beckett, as to
the Gnostics. the created world is radically evil. and its negation
is the chance of another world that is not yet. w931 In its refusal
leading
with
444.
"'
Ibid.
332
roles"
is
no
longer
During World
the French
[Beckett]
An
He adds: "Parce
Beckett
features
certain
dramas
in
order
to
highlight
their
1969), 19.1
Beckett wrote most o f h i s works i n F r e n c h and t h e n l a t e r
t r a n s f a t e d them to Engl i s h .
In t h e l a t t e r years o f h i s l i f e h e
wrote i n German as wel 1 .
, l958), 8 3 ,
q u o t e d i n E s s l in ,
The T h e a t r e o f t h e Absurd, 2 0 .
are "out of harmonyn - the original musical meaning of "absurd" wi th what theat re audiences expect .940
t raditional
tradition,
disjointed world. Absurd theatre's form exemplif ies how the means
3-4.
5.
in
However, the
Esslin
Absurd theatre
of awareness."942
abandonment
of
dialogue, in
traditional dramatic
an attempt to awaken
techniques
the
and
audience.
rational
Beckett's
an instrument
for
the
language becomes evident when the words spoken are contrasted with
the actions. For example. at the end of
Act 1
941 I b i d . ,
351.
942 I b i d .
9C3 I b i d . ,
64.
~ h e ydo no t move.
'''
In h i s
mastered
by
formulations.,945
Beckett's plays lack plot more than any other absurd plays.946
His
The action of
II
Likewise in Happy Days we see two days in the life of Winnie which
are really very much the same, except that the second ends with an
ambiguou confrontat ion.94i How many more time will the cycle
944 Samuel B e c k e t t ,
M i n u i t , 1952), 7 5 .
En A t t e n d a n t Godot ( P a r i s : L e s Pdi t i o n s de
64.
946 I b i d . , 25.
947 Rosemary P o u t n e y suggests t h a t t h e appearance o f W i I l i e
( W i n n i e t s husband) a t the end o f Act I I parallels his I r v e r b a l
p r e s e n t a t i o n o f h i m s e l f a t t h e end o f A c t 1 .
A l though h e f i n a l 1 y
a p p e a r s , s t i l 1 t h e y can only l o o k a t each o t h e r ; t o t o u c h i s
impossi b l e .
The d i s t a n c e between them cannot be crossed.
"The
f i n a l c o n f r o n t a t i o n between husband and w i fe produces a d r a m a t i c
c l i m a x , a 1 i near movernent, that closes an o t h e r w i se cycl i c p l a y . "
recur?
with the dwindling of the supplies in the cupboard. The play can
only end with Hamm and Clov frozen in a stalemate.
assumes
world
in which
"human nature,
the
diversity
of
Beckett ' s
do.
They rnerely
interact with each other and with two other figures who appear on
their way
to
In fact, "[tlhe
There are many
949 I b i d .
We are also unaware of how long Winnie has been buried in the
earth in Happy Days. And the only thing that changes i s that she
s i n k s further into the ground in Act II.
- to herself. The
951 I b i d . ,
6.
952 I b i d . , 2 8 .
be
because one might hear voices " that explore the mysteries of being
and the self to the limits of anguish and s u f fering. ,,953
Coupied with the need to keep talking, is also the need for
habit,
... to
defend
However, when
953 Essl i n ,
954 S a m u e l
955 Essl in ,
956 Samuel
957 Essl in ,
The T h e a t r e
Beckett,
o f the A b s ~ r d ,3 9 .
Happy
The T h e a t r e
o f t h e Absurd, 3 8 .
B e c k e t t , q u o t e d i n Hayman,
The T h e a t r e o f t h e Absurd,
340
Samue7 B e c k e t t , 5 9 .
360.
Seeing one's
strong
affirmation
for
Beckett's
Many times he
art,
especially
the
Clearly. in Adorno's
958 I b i d . , 3 7 7 .
e v i d e n c e f f [ Ldke, " D e r K r o n z e u g e , I f 1 3 6 . ]
F r a n z Kafka i s a n o t h e r o f A d o r n o ' s 1 i t e r a r y Kronzeuge.
Sauerland agrees
aesthetic
embodying
innermost
structure.,,964
Beckett's
innovative dramatic
by
its
form
Although Beckett
'"
in Gerrnany/Gerrnany in B e c k e t t u New
E i n f h r u n g i n d i e A s t h e t i k Adornos, 109.
P r i s m s , 32.
trans
As a result , and in
of empty
de ci si on^."^^'
differs
fundamentally
with
an
assumed
connection of
other
theatre
critics.968
Esslin
refers
to
"the
deep
966 Adorno,
"Towards an U n d e r s t a n d i ng o f Endgame,
99.
967 I b i d . , 99-100.
968 Among t h e o t h e r c r i t i c s who rnake r e f e r e n c e t o expl i c i t
Lyons, who
e x i s t e n t i a l themes i n B e c k e t t ' s w o r k i s C h a r l e s R.
r e f e r s t o t h e c h a r a c t e r s ' s e a r c h f o r a sense o f s e l f . [ C h a r l e s R .
Lyons, "Happy Days and D r a m a t i c C o n v e n t i o n , " i n B r a t e r , Beckett a t
80/Beckett i n Context ( N e w Y o r k : O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y Press, 1986),
85.1 To Adorno, t h i s e x i s t e n t i a l s e a r c h f o r a sense o f s e l f i s
s u p e r f l u o u s because t h e r e is no s e l f 1e f t f o r whi c h one can search.
969 In f a c t , E s s l i n t c h a p t e r on B e c k e t t i s e n t i t l e d : "Samuel
B e c k e t t : The Search f o r t h e S e l f . " [ E s s l i n , The T h e a t r e o f t h e
Absurd, 12.1
Ibid.,
23.
though, that Beckett does not "argu[e] about the absurdity of the
human conditionn as do Camus or Sartre in their "Existentialist
theatre."
that is,
dif ference between the approach of the philosopher and that of the
poet. w971
And it
As has
and
then
'absurdity,'
of
to
transfigure
971 I b i d . ,
972 Adorno,
973
Esl i n ,
intentionality
which
seeks
6.
"Cornmitment," 3 1 4 .
The T h e a t r e o f t h e Absurd,
344
353.
to
claim
that
meaninglessness itself
process
abandons
is meaningful.
itself
to
absurdity
Beckett's
"poetic
guiding
without
principle. n9i5
have him; Beckett simply lays bare that world and in fact magnifies
its
disjointedness, without
certainly without
comment, without
suggestions
for
an
judgement, and
interpretation of
the
the
loss
of
from
an
Adornian
of
replacing
the
And
an
's
is that absurdity, in and of itself. is "no longer a universal that would simply make the absurd into an i d e a . "
97' Adorno,
Instead, what we
975 I b i d . , 8 2 .
m
-.,.
977 I b i d .
978 Adorno,
"Towards an U n d e r s t a n d i ng o f Endgame,
345
" 92.
find are
dismal details which scorn conceptualization, a region filled
with utensils, suggesting emergency quarters, refrigerators,
paralysis, blindness and unappetizing bodily functions.
Everything waits to be carted off - to the dump, or to the
death camps. This region is not symbolic but rather the state
of affairs in which psycho
y is no longer relevant: that of
the aged and the tortured.%RF
In contrast to the Existentialists, for whom "the situation
came to designate temporal existence as such. and the living
individual in its totality was considered to be that which is
absolutely certain," Beckett does not
implied assumption
of persona1 identity.
Rather. Beckett
Instead,
possess
autonomy
implausible."982
and
ontological
status
have
become
"the aping
of
something
979 I b i d .
Ibid.
981 I b i d .
982 I b i d . , 9 0 .
983 I b i d . , 1 0 7 .
nonexistent.
Individuality
means
nothing.
lfg8'
One becomes
has
is
the direction
"disintegrated." 987
indifference o f
of history. w986
Human
beings
each
The
have
In light
What is considered
"
typically
Adorno, N e g a t i v e DiaTectics, 3 6 2 .
986 I b i d .
987 Adorno,
Grove
to
trashcan ...,Beckett's
trashcans
are
emblems
of
culture
they
have
become
accustomed.
"The fear of
such
For
condemned, so
Adorno,
this means
that
if
individuality
is
989 Adorno,
Ibid.,
''' I b i d . ,
89.
meaning of situation.
Because
the subject is no
longer
'I
In Beckett.
t1994
realm between life and death where Beckett's plays take place. "not
even suffering is possible any longer."
the two living in the trashbins pine for sawdust, that "miserable
by product of the world of things."
sentence." 9 9 5
992 I b i d . , 92.
993 I b i d . , 93.
994 I b i d .
995 I b i d . , 1 0 6 .
reality."
rom
their
relationship
Existentialism
to
with
the
following:
"French
""*
996 I b i d . , 9 3 .
997 I b i d . , 8 5 .
350
As
for Endgame.
concludes Adorno.
the
"have
the
catastrophes
which
individual.
inspired
it,
exploded
As
a result,
Rather, it
f,
1002
999 I b i d .
0O'
Adorno,
"Towards an U n d e r s t a n d i ng o f Endgame,
89.
'Oo1
o f h a r b o u r i n g p r e c i s e l y such s e n t i m e n t s .
'Oo2
Adorno,
"Towards an U n d e r s t a n d i n g o f Endgame,
"
89.
which Beckett imposes on his absurd theatre lacks plot. setting and
characters, thus discouraging the sense of an harmonious play. But
for Adorno, even the material dimension of Beckett's plays is
affected : the materials
themselves
In thi
way,
explains
of
the
sign.w 1004
In
Beckett's
art,
" [nlon-
drama.
Whereas dialogue
tradit ionally
In this, Adorno,
I b i d . , 91.
'Oo4
Ibid.
''O5
Ibid.
'Oo6
I b i d . , 100.
scorned.
the forms.
notes that "[al11 that remains of cornedy is the fact that the
demise of the punchline is the demise o f comedy itself-,,1009
Adorno considers humour to have become obsolete as an aesthetic
The
At
Ibid.,
101.
'Oo8
Ibid.,
99.
'Oo9
Ibid.
'O1'
Ibid.,
'O1'
I b i d . , 99.
98.
to
been
have
tragic
are
so
obviously
inconsequential. 1012
Because the loss of the subject has already occurred, any further
tragedy would merely pale in comparison.
weeping
takes the
place
of
"A
laughter" and.
dried u p , tearless
suggests Adorno,
empty
eyes. 1013
disharmony."1014
"1s A r t L i g h t h e a r t e d ? " ,
i n Notes
to
Ibid.
loi' Adorno, 'lTowards an U n d e r s t a n d i ng o f Endgame, " 8 3 .
Adorno's p r a i s e s t h e music o f Schonberg i n t h e essay, "The S o c i a l
S i t u a t i o n o f Music,"
f o r e x a c t f y t h e same reasons he p r a i s e s
B e c k e t t ' s t h e a t r e : ' f S c h o n b e r g ' s r e a l l y c e n t r a l achievement
which,
has never been p r o p e r 7 y a p p r e c i a t e d f r o m t h e
by t h e way,
traditional perspective o f observation
i s t h a t he, f r o m h i s
e a r l i e s t works on
f o r example, i n t h e songs o f h i s Opus 6
never
behaved ' e x p r e s s i o n i s t i c a l l y , ' s u p e r i m p o s i ng s u b j e c t i v e in t e n t i o n s
upon heterogenous m a t e r i a l in an a u t h o r i t a r i an and i n c o n s i d e r a t e
manner.
Every g e s t u r e w i t h w h i c h he in t e r v e n e s i n t h e r n a t e r i a l
c o n f i g u r a t i o n i s a t t h e same t i m e an answer t o q u e s t i o n s d i r e c t e d
t o him by t h e m a t e r i a l i n t h e f o r m o f i t s own immanent problems.
Every
sub j e c t i ve
expressi ve
a c h i evement
of
Schonberg
is
simultaneously t h e r e s o l u t i o n o f o b j e c t i v e - m a t e r i a l c o n t r a d i c t i o n s
which c o n t i n u e d t o e x i s t i n t h e Wagnerian t e c h n i q u e o f c h r o m a t i c
sequence and i n t h e d i a t o n i c t e c h n i q u e o f v a r i a t i o n empf oyed by
Brahms as w e l 1 . "
[Adorno, "The S o c i a l S i t u a t i o n of Music, " Te7os
35 ( S p r i n g 1 9 7 8 ) , 135.1
art.1016
standards
of
beauty,
harmony
and
traditional
aesthetic
symmetry.O' 1'
. . .originates
This "fragmentariness
S a u e r l and,
Adorno,
concept
implies.
For Adorno.
E i n f h r v n g i n d i e A s t h e t i k Adornos, 4 .
A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 9-1 0 .
'O1'
W o l i n , "The D e - A e s t h e t i c i z a t i o n o f A r t , " 112.
W o l i n p o i n t s o u t an i n t e r e s t i n g comparison made by W a l t e r
Ben j ami n ( U r s p r u n g des Deutschen T r a u e r s p i e 7s) between a r t o f t h e
Baroque and modern p e r i o d s . r t [ T l he g r e a t a r t i s t i c achievements o f
both epochs c o n s i s t o f fragments r a t h e r t h a n p e r f e c t works. . b o t h
periods
are
eras
of
historical
decline
and
therefore
temperamental 1 y u n s u i t e d t o t h e ' nobl e s i mpl i c i t y ' o f c l a s s i c a l
w o r k s o f a r t ; y e t , n e v e r t h e l e s s , t h e y a r e b o t h c h a r a c t e r i z e d by a
relentless
'will
t o art, '
a
fact
which accounts
for
the
The f r a g m e n t a r y
u n c o n v e n t i o n a l f o r m assumed by t h e i r c r e a t i o n s .
w o r k s o f moderni srn r e p r e s e n t t h e contemporary c o u n t e r p a r t t o t h e
r u i n s o f t h e Baroque era."
[Ibid.,
112-3.1
One c o u l d do a
..
...
AS
a result
the power
of
the
continual
f Plure
In this manner, as
'O2'
Ibid.
'O2'
I b i d . , 85.
I b i d . , 112.
C l o v exempl i f i e s t h i s argument i n h i s w i 11 i ngness i n Endgame
t o g e t t h e g a f f t o deal w i t h t h e small boy he says he s p o t s ; t h e r e
i s no more n a t u r e and t h e r e must be no more 1 if e , a l 1 i s i n a state
o f d e t e r i o r a t i on.
illustrates
this
principle.
Accordingl
then,
for
with
itself
only
without
force
and
free
of
domination.,,1025
In Adorno's theory, in nature is found the trace of the nonidentical in a world where the spell of identity is universal, and
the beauty of nature ( das Naturschone) is the historical appearance
Ibid.,
Ibid.
140.
1 t i
ratio
into
control,"102i
the
dustbin
and
replaced
it
with
direct
realism.
in response to those who would make the central theme of works such
capable
domination. "1029
of
seizing
the
reins
and
abolishing
Ibid.
'O2?
"
85.
I b i d . , 105.
'O2'
I b i d . , 109.
Ludke argues t h a t f o r Adorno t h i s M a s t e r - S e r v a n t
h i g h l i g h t s o n l y one aspect o f B e c k e t t ' s a r t .
motif
Servant motif is
" ridiculed."'O3'
The
the beginning,
any assurance whether or not the whole thing will begin again from
the beginning.
'O3'
Ibid.
'O3'
Ibid.
Ibid.
Master-Servant relationship
For Adorno
the very means of humanity's initial self-freeing from the preEnlightenment phase by learning to dominate nature is the "seed of
" ~ have
~
corne to know.
al1 the e ~ i l " we
He lauds this
. . .and
autonomy . w1034
Adorno
reaches
is
that
Ldke,
"Der Kronzeuge,
Adorno
"
defend
the
enigmatic
145.
...
in
'O3'
Ibid.
meaning
which
Instead of making
the
Adorno
recognizes that
in
fact. the
'O4'
i b i d . , 84.
'O4' I b i d . , 1 0 3 .
I n Beckett's Endgame, Hamm's p a r e n t s l i v e i n t h e t w o garbage
cans i n t h e room.
Adorno in d i c a t e s t h a t Hamm s a y t h i s 1 i ne i n Endgame ( p .
23 i n t h e t e x t Adorno was r e f e r e n c i ng)
However, as t h e t r a n s l a t o r
o f A d o r n o ' s Endgame n o t e s , t h i s l i n e was o m i t t e d i n t h e E n g l i s h
t r a n s l a t i o n , which i s as fol!ows:
Hamm (exaspera t e d ) : Have you n o t f i n i shed? W i 17 you n e v e r
finish?
( W i t h sudden f u r y . )
W i l l t h i s never f i n i s h ?
(Nagg d i s a p p e a r s i n t o h i s b i n , c l o s e s t h e 7 i d b e h i n d
him.
Ne7 7 does not move.
Frenzied7y.
My kingdom f o r
a nightman!
(He whist7es.
Enter C7ov.)
C l e a r away
t h i s muck!
Chuck i t i n t h e sea!
(C7ov goes t o b i n s ,
ha 7 t s . )
Ne77: So w h i t e .
Hamm: What?
W h a t ' s she b l a t h e r i n g about?
( C l o v stoops,
takes N e 7 7 ' s hand f e e 7 s h e r p u i s e . )
Ne7 7 ( t o C i o v ) : D e s e r t ! (C7ov l e t s go h e r hand, pushes h e r
back i n the b i n , c l o s e s t h e 7 i d . )
C7ov ( r e t u r n i n g t o h i s p7ace b e s i d e t h e c h a i r ) :
S h e has no
pulse.
Hamm: What was she d r i v e l l i n g a b o u t ?
C7ov: She told m e t o go away, i n t o t h e d e s e r t .
[ B e c k e t t , Endgame, 23.1
structure.
second
convention,
He
describes
how
Beckett
Adorno
as
. . .a
grammar which has abandoned al1 relation to its content, and thus
has lost its syntnetic function.
~ n dyet. as
if
come next."1049
This
" involuntary
"Towards an U n d e r s t a n d i ng o f Endgaine,"
'O4
Adorno,
'O4'
Ibid.
'OC5
Ibid.
'OA6
I b i d . , 104.
102.
'O4'
Adorno,
Ibid.
"
104.
and is analogous to "the people who wait in the zoo to see what the
Adorno
underscores, for example, the fact that nothing escapes the process
of deterioration: the health of the characters, the supplies in the
cupboacds, and "there is no more nature. "'O5'
t o t a l l y mastered, " totally reified.
by
the dread
of
Thus,
Beckett's art
does
not
give
the
illusion
Because
of unity -
but
acknowledges the ultimate irreconciliation of its basic moments his art can be a medium of truth. Through the dialectic caused by
'Os0
Ibid.
'O5'
Beckett,
'Os2
Adorno,
Endgame, 1 1 .
T o w a r d s and U n d e r s t a n d i n g o f Endgarne," 8 6 .
'Os3 I b i d .
I n a n o t h e r e s s a y , Adorno r e f e r s t o t h e t i t l e o f one o f
B e c k e t t ' s n o v e l s : L 'innommable, ( The Unnameab7e). H e suggests t h a t
t h e t i t l e chosen " n o t o n l y f i t s i t s s u b j e c t m a t t e r b u t a l s o
truth
about t h e name7essness o f c o n t e m p o r a r y
embodies t h e
1 i t e r a t u r e . Not a word i n it h a s any v a l u e now i f i t does n o t Say
t h e u n s a y a b l e , t h e f a c t that i t cannot be s a i d . "
[Adorno,
" T i tl e s , " i n N o t e s t o L i t e r a t u r e , V o l
II, 4. ]
"critical to the
not be. .IO55
but
no
one
wi11
admit. "1057
exemplifies Adorno's
argument
In
that
this
sense,
".,.art
may
Beckett's
be
the
art
only
suffering,
'l
'Os4
Osborne,
'Os6
Adorno,
"Towards an U n d e r s t a n d i ng o f
'O5'
Ibid.,
319.
treten."
be able to die.
Endgame, suggests
Adorno,
Beckett
has
translated
But
the
in
"Old
Instead of
'O6'
Ibid.,
'O6'
Adorno,
'O6'
Beckett,
Adorno,
319, 4 5 .
>'Towards an U n d e r s t a n d i ng o f Endgame,
"
108.
Endgame, 57.
"Towards an U n d e r s t a n d i ng o f Endgame, " 1 1 4 .
- because
1t i as H-
has noticed: "The end is in the beginning and yet you go on. m 1068
seen,
Ibid.
Ibid.
B e c e t t , Endgame, 4 4 .
'O6' Geul in, "A M a t t e r o f T r a d i t i on, " 1 6 0 .
Adorno would d e f i n i t e l y u n d e r s t a n d G e u l i n ' s remark f o r as a
Jew, Adorno f e l t he s h o u l d have d i e d i n t h e gas chamber; d u r i n g t h e
p e r i o d of t h e T h i r d Reich, he w e n t i n t o e x i l e i n England and t h e
U n i t e d States.
For him, t h e r e f o r e , " i t i s n o t wrong t o r a i s e t h e
. q u e s t i o n whether a f t e r A u s c h w i t z you can go on 1 i v i n g
e s p e c i a l l y w h e t h e r one w h o escaped by a c c i d e n t , one w h o by r i g h t s
H i s mere s u r v i v a l cal 1s
s h o u l d have been k i 1 l e d rnay go on 1 i v i n g .
f o r t h e coldness, t h e b a s i c p r i n c i p l e o f b o u r g e o i s s u b j e c t i v i t y ,
w i t h o u t which t h e r e could have been no Auschwitz; t h i s i s t h e
d r a s t i c gui 1 t o f him who has been spared. " [Adorno,
Negative
D i a 7ecti c s , 363. ]
..
Beckett,
Endgame, 69.
Art like
demon to fight the demon ... so Beckett's language unto death means
II
1070
. . . . .1071
And
as
that
of
Beckett, which does not "taboo[], but work[sj out" this savagery
and
barbarity
is
not
to
leave
'O6'
'OT0
Jay,
'O7'
Adorno,
" 31 2 .
368
Thus, the ugly in art, which Adorno insists many times over is
those who would wish to once again use the regressive wishes of the
masses for political purposes.
with
his
insistence
upon
the
artist's
social
On the
125.
Ibid.
Adorno,
"Cornmi tment
, " 31 5.
369
In
fact, the argument is often stated that al1 Western art originated
with religious art.
Jay,
The D i a 7 e c t i c a 7 I m a g i n a t i o n ,
299.
Weber,
And
work of art brought out the point of the literature more clearly,
only the emphasis had now changed to Christian literature and
Christian works of art.
rhetorical
technique, to win
Christian faith.
"the heathen
listeners to
the
not
See t h e n e x t s e c t i o n of t h i s c h a p t e r f o r f u r t h e r
e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e use o f drama i n t h e Medieval C h r i s t i a n c h u r c h .
'O8'
Andreas M e r t i n,
uKunstvol 1 p r e d i gen : Der Umgang m i t
Kunstwerken in homi 1e t i scher P e r s p e k t i ve, " chap. in B i 7der und i h r e
Macht: Zum V e r h a ' l t n i s von K u n s t und c h r i s t 7 i c h e r R e 7 i g i o n , eds.
H o r s t Schwebel and Andreas M e r t i n (Stuttgart: Ver1 ag Kath01 isches
B i b e l w e r k , l 9 8 9 ) , 214-5.
M e r t i n g i v e s s p e c i f i c examples o f t h i s p r a c t i c e i n t h e h i s t o r y
o f C h r i s t i a n homi l e t i c s .
He r e f e r s t o , f o r example, Basi l i u s von
Caeserea w h o preached on mattyrdom w i t h C h r i s t as t h e umpire, as
p o r t r a y e d in a p a i n t i n g by Barlaam, and t o Gregory o f Nyssa, who,
i n a sermon on S t . Theodor, shows a p a i n t i n g a b 0 on t h e theme o f
martyrdom w i t h C h r i s t as t h e u m p i r e i n human form.
[cf. I b i d . ]
As a n o t e , t h e work c i t e d here i s one o f t h e p u b l i s h e d works
o f t h e Marburg I n s t i t u t e t o which 1 w i 11 r e f e r i n t h e n e x t s e c t i o n
o f t h i s chapter.
M e r t i n was a s c h o l a r r e s e a r c h i n g a t t h e Marburg
for didactic
By
purposes
that the use of art was for the "instruction of the people. 1083
In fact, in the thirteenth century the b i b l i a pauperum (bible of
into
being.
consisting of
illustrated
Thee
texts
images were
clearly seen as teaching vehicles for the poor and thus. the
unlearned.
'O8*
A.
(Munich,
Hauser,
l983), l 3 3 f . ,
Literatur
216.
learned
to
read
238.
Ibid.
Andreas M e r t i n "Der a l l g e m e i n e und d e r besondere
B i 1d e r s t r e i t
al s
p a r a d i gma
c h r i s t 1icher
K u n s t e r f a h r u n g , " chap. i n Andreas M e r t i n and H o r s t Schwebel , eds. ,
K i r c h e und Moderne Kunst: E i n e a k t u e 7 l e Dokumentat i o n ( F r a n k f u r t a m
M a i n : Athenaum, 1 9 8 8 ) , 158.
T h i s a t t i t u d e which d i c t a t e d w h a t was a p p r o p r i a t e and
a c c e p t a b l e a r t i s , a c c o r d i n g t o M e r t i n ' s d e f i n i t i o n , a fortn o f
ic o n o c l asm.
1 konok1 asmus :
paintings in churches were the books for children and women. rn 1088
This attitude goes beyond viewing art as an a n c i l l a ecclesiae
(maidservant of the church), to considering art as a "part of the
theology. [even as] identical with it.n1089
value and are al1 made for one goal only: that of the church.
Works of art remain, according to this attitude, subordinate to
their didactic-pragmatic function as dictated by the officia1
Or, as Adorno argued in h i s essay on art and
church
religion,
such
accidentally . .LU92
religious
works
of
art
are
art
"only
'O8'
E r n s t P i p e r , Savonarola:
P u r i t a n e r s im F 7 o r e n z d e r Medici
I b i d . , 157.
'O8'
Ibid.,
'Og0
H. J .
158.
Gei s c h e r ,
D e r byzantinische
Bi T d e r s t r e i t (Leipzig,
1980), 36, c i t e d i n I b i d .
'Og1
M e r t i n n o t e s how t h i s a t t i t u d e d i d not d i e out w i t h
Savonarola, r a t h e r S a v o n a r o l a can be i d e n t i f i e d as one o f t h e
sources f o r t h e same a t t i t u d e s t i1 1 p r e v a l e n t among "bourgeoi s
C h r i s t i a n s o f t h e p r e s e n t . " [ I b i d . , 159.1
'Og2
Adorno,
Ir
677.
would be the work of art which was worshipped and not God, that
AS
a r e s u l t . many
towards art was not limited to art within the church building
itself. Rather, art as autonornous was also feared. The fear among
Christians, especially church leaders was that
if no
longer
Artists
would
whether
it was
through religious.
only been the religious institutions which have pushed the artists
out for not producing the appropriate forms of art, but a l s o the
artists who have turned their back to the church and l l k e p t their
work distant from the realm of the c h u r ~ h l 'in
~ ~order
~~
to guard
Bredekamp,
"Autonomi e
und Askese, "
in
Autonomie
der Kunst
( F r a n k f u r t : Suhrkamp, 1 9 7 2 ) , 1 2 1 , 1 3 3 , i n Marcuse, The A e s t h e t i c
Dimension, 66-7.]
'Og5
Adorno, A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 2.
'Og7
Ibid.
Responses of Christians w h o
maintain the notion that art must proclaim the Christian message
c o n v e r s i o n and
. . .the
aim
is
These
sentiments expressed merely echo the desire that the church once
again gain control and dictate what art should be produced and for
what purpose.
To
of established institutions
of
religion, will make art into a rnere means for something which it is
not: for the ideology of the Christian church- And if, as w e have
seen,
the
Christian
religion
has
itself
taken
on
the
'Og8
A.C.
Bridge,
"Churches,
a t t i s t s and p e o p l e , "
Church
I n f o r m a t i o n Board ( 1 9 5 9 ) , 1 5 , c i t e d i n F . J . Glendenning, "The
Church and t h e A r t s , " i n Frank Glendenni n g , ed. , The Church and t h e
A r t s (London: SCM, 1960), 13.
C h r i s t i a n Rrama ( J u l y 19501,
(no P .
We
In
"Oo
Adorno,
A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 195.
378
American sources which deal with t h i s subject often use the term
"religious" instead of "Christian," with the inherent assumption
that the two are equal.1101
and purposes in life that grow from the revelation of the highest
values conceivable. It seeks to relate man to the totality of his
being .
for a
religiou
".
Haro1d Ehrensperger,
Re7 i g i o u s Drama: Ends and Means
(Westport, C o n n e c t i c u t : Greenwood Press, 1977; r e p r i n t of Abi ngdon
P r e s s , New York, 1962 e d i t i o n ) , 67.
Ehrensperger ' s t e x t c o n t i n u e s t o be c o n s i d e r e d t h e b e s t s o u r c e
f o r s t u d i e s i n 'Ire1 i g i o u s drama."
Ibid.
Any
v a l u e . tq1104
religious
As such, one's
Christian
And i f one
be a source for shaping the meaning of the text and the actions to
fit one's agenda.
' O4
Ibid.,
72.
..
similar
argument
to
Browne's
for
theatre's
religious
'O6
The t h e a t r e t r o u p e ,
" T h e a t r e and Companyrt based i n
K i t c h e n e r , ON, i s one example o f a t r o u p e w h i c h assumes such a
stance.
They a r e an o u t g r o w t h o f t h e Cambridge YWAM a r t s t r a i n i n g
program - which w i 11 be d i s c u s s e d more s p e c i f i c a l l y i n t h e n e x t
section.
T h e a t r e and Companyf s M i s s i on Statement inc1 udes t h e
f o l l o w i ng:
"Fu1 1 - t i r n e
Company
rnembers
are
drawn
from
an
in t e r n a t i onal and r e g i o n a l communi t y o f t h e a t r e a r t is t s who share
a b i b l i c a l w o r l d v i e w and who seek t o s e r v e t h e i r audience t h r o u g h
in n o v a t i ve and engagi ng uses o f t h e d r a m a t i c medi um. "
["Theatre
and Company M i s s i on Staternent, " (June W W ) .]
Thei r c h o i c e of
s c r i p t s i s v a r i e d and i n c l u d e s works by b o t h well-known,
not
n e c e s s a r i l y C h r i s t i an p l a y w r i g h t s ( e g . Ath01 F u g a r d ' s The Road t o
Mecca and Robert Bo1t 's The S i s t e r h o o d , an a d a p t a t i o n o f Mol ie r e l s
Les Femmes Savantes), as w e l l as b y t h o s e who a r e l e s s e r known.
The a c t i n g , however, remai ns f l a t and o b v i o u s l y s u b s e r v i e n t t o t h e
The i m p o r t a n c e o f t h e message becomes apparent i n p o s t message.
performance d i s c u s s i o n s w h i c h u s u a l ly do n o t f o c u s on d r a m a t i c
t e c h n i q u e s , b u t on t h e p o i n t o f t h e p l a y .
"O7
E. M a r t i n Browne,
The P r o d u c t i o n o f Religious P k y s
(London: P h i l i p A l l a n and Company, 1 9 3 2 ) , 1 0 .
Browne uses t h i s c i t a t i o n f r o m t h e Bishop o f C h i c h e s t e r t o
open h i s study of r e l i g i o u s d r a m a t i c p r o d u c t i o n s i n England d u r i n g
Browne was i n s t r u m e n t a l
t h e e a r l y p a r t o f the t w e n t i e t h century.
i n t h e e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f t h e Re1 i g i o u s Drama S o c i e t y i n England
which s t i l l o f f e r s summer workshops - and l a t e r t a u g h t drama and
w o r s h i p courses a t Union T h e o l o g i c a l Seminary i n New Y o r k .
s p e c i f i c a l l y , C h r i s t i a n - r o o t s , Bloor s t a t e s :
the t w e n t i e t h
In
production.
w1109
In contrast
to
the
p r o d u c t i o n s of
the m a j o r i t y
naturally,
of
the p l a y s
from a lack o f
written and p r o u c e d
l i t e r a r y d i s t i n c t i o n and
"suffer,
a somewhat
'O8
R . H . U . Bloor, C h r i s t i a n i t y and t h e ReTigious Drama, T h e
E s s e x Ha1 1 L e c t u r e , 1928 (Boston: Beacon P r e s s , 1930; r e p r i nted by
Norwood E d i t i o n s , 1 9 7 7 ) , 15-16.
Bloor o u t 1 i n e s t h e a c c e p t e d v e r s i o n o f t h e o r i g i n o f C h r i s t i a n
drama i n t h e Medieval p e r i o d . ( R e f e r e n c e t o t h e drama o f t h e Greek
c l a s s i c a l p e r i o d i s e i t h e r f o r g o t t e n o r de7 i b e r a t e l y l e f t a s i d e . )
"The drama o f t h e Middf e Ages was a new c r e a t i o n , a most
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c t h i n g , t h a t a r o s e i n t h e v e r y bosom o f t h e Church,
and was e v o l v e d from her 1 it u r g y . . I t was o u t o f the E a s t e r r i t u a 1
t h a t spoken Re1 i g i o u s Drama t o o k i t s a c t u a l r i s e i n t h e n i n t h
c e n t u r y [ c o r r e c t i o n : tenth c e n t u r y ] . it had become customary t o
i nsert addi t i o n a l melodies i n t h e a n t i p h o n a l m u s i c . These melodies
were a t f i r s t sung merely t o vowel s o u n d s . Then words w e r e p u t t o
t h e m . . . F o u r of t h e b r e t h r e n , s u i t a b l y r o b e d , p l a y e d t h e c h i e f
p a r t s . O n e o f t h e m , r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e a n g e l , s a t by t h e s e p u l c h r e
w i t h a palm i n h i s hand. T h e o t h e r t h r e e , r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e women
The b r o t h e r by
coming t o t h e tomb, wal ked s l o w l y up t h e c h u r c h .
t h e s e p u l c h r e c h a n t e d the Quem guaeritis [ w h o m do you seek] . The
t h r e e r e p l i e d i n unison. And when bidden t o go and announce t h a t
C h r i s t had r i s e n , t h e y t u r n e d t o t h e c h o i r u t t e r i n g t h e words
A 7 7 e 7 u i a ! resurrexit Dominus!"
[ I b i d . , 13-15.]
. .
"O9
performance
can
tell
of
minds
and
hearts
touched
by
O'"
Ibid.
its autonomy from the church, and performances took place more and
I n f a c t , t o c a l 1 drama a "new t o o l " w i t h i n t n e R e f o r m a t i o n
church t r a d i t i o n i s f a l s e , f o r as e a r l y a s t h e s i x t e e n t h c e n t u r y ,
members o f t h e R e f o r m a t i o n churches, i n c l u d i n g A n a b a p t i s t s , i n t h e
Low C o u n t r i e s ( t h e N e t h e r l a n d s and B e l g i um) used t h e a t r e f o r t h e
purposes o f communicating t h e i r r e l i g i o u s v i e w s .
A t the core o f
Gary K. Wai t e ' s s t u d y o f s i x t e e n t h c e n t u r y " r h e t o r i c i an drama" is
t h e q u e s t i o n : W i d t h e y use t h e i r drama as propaganda, e i t h e r f o r
o r a g a i n s t t h e new [ r e f o r m a t i o n ]
ideas?"
[Gary K.
Wai t e ,
"Reforrners on Stage: R h e t o r i c i an Drama and Ueformat ion propaganda
1519-1556,t1 A r c h i v
fr
i n the
Netherlands o f
C h a r l e s V,
Reformationsgeschichte 83 ( W W ) , 21 1. ] Wai t e examines t h e drama
c o r n p e t i t i o n s h e l d b y t h e r h e t o r i c i a n Chambers i n p l a c e s such as
Ghent and Antwerp.
He n o t e s t h a t t h e Ghent c o r n p e t i t i o n i n
p a r t i cul a r "becarne infamous f o r it s advocacy o f r e l ig i ous r e f o r m
and i m p l i c i t c r i t i c i s m o f t h e a u t h o r i t i e s . " [ I b i d . , 220.1
With
speci f i c r e f e r e n c e t o t h e in f 1uence o f Anabapti s t t h e 0 1 ogy on t h i s
c o m p e t i t i o n , W a i t e g i v e s t h e f o l l o w i n g example: "Perhaps t h e most
t h e o l o g i c a l l y u n o r t h o d o x performance a t t h e Ghent c o m p e t i t i o n w a s
p r o v i d e d by t h e Deinze Chamber.
A l t h o u g h [Jacobus B . ]
Drewes
doubts t h a t any r h e t o r i c i ans would have been b o l d enough pub7 icl y
t o p r e s e n t Anabapti s t c o n v i c t i o n s on t h e Ghent s t a g e , t h e Dei nze
p l a y c o n t a i n s t e n e t s whi ch, when t a k e n t o g e t h e r , s t r o n g l y s u g g e s t
in f 1uence f rom one o f s e v e r a l Anabapti s t q u a r t e r s . "
[ Jacobus B.
Drewes, T n t e r p r e t a t i e van de Genste Spel en van 1539: Grenzen o f
onmacht van de f i l o l ~ g i e ?TNTL
~ ~ 100 ( 1 9 8 4 ) , 251, c i t e d i n I b i d . ,
2 2 6 . ] Wai t e concl udes t h a t a l though "many r h e t o r i c i ans used t h e i r
drama as r e f o r m a t i o n propaganda," t h e elernents o f propaganda may
have even been more p e r v a s i v e and s u b t l e : I r . in 1 ig h t o f r e c e n t
f i n d i ngs on t h e propagandi s t i c f u n c t i o n o f g e s t u r e and r i tual, even
seemingly b e n i g n l i t e r a r y t e x t s , when s t u d i e d i n t h e c o n t e x t o f t h e
p o t e n t i a l l y e x p l o s i v e atmosphere o f the e a r l y R e f o r m a t i o n , c a n t a k e
on r e v o l u t i o n a r y s i g n i f i c a n c e .
I n o t h e r words, it m i g h t n o t have
been n e c e s s a r y f o r a reform-mi nded dramati s t e x p l ic i t l y t o a d v o c a t e
the widescale r e j e c t i o n o f t h e a u t h o r i t y o f the C a t h o l i c h i e r a r c h y
when he c o u l d make t h e same p o i n t b y s u b t l e r - and l e s s dangerous
means, such a s in s i n u a t i on, b i 67 ic a l para1 1 e l s and even f a c i a7
e x p r e s s i o n s . " [ I b i d , , 237.1
..
Rather, drama
is a tool - but not just any tool, for this is a powerful and
effective tool which can be used to communicate t h e message of t h e
church in a way which affects people on an emotional level.
The goal is that people will "corn[e] to know the Lord."
Whether or
coumitment
4.
The inherent goal of Christian theatre is to bring the nonChristian to Christ and to strengthen the faith of the Christian,
"YWAM" is:
tq
1118
Secondly, and in
These mandates,
however, remain c o v e r t .
Al1 who becorne members
of YWAM are
taught and
urged
to
acknowledge
need
our
for
openness
because
of.
the
second
"must
tell
each
our secrets."
other all
The
third
"divine
plumbline." When one becomes out of balance, one is "put back into
line by Godw - or by God's helpers.
the
important
for
need
"God
to
sanctify
our
a prograrn c a l l e d
in
they are t r a i n e d
the
various a r t s .
" T h e k i d s are u s e d
o u t r e a c h which t a r g e t s c e r t a i n p l a c e s .
strategy t o get to
p l a c e s . . . . [The o r g a n i z a t i o n ] e x p l o i t s
as a
their
So f a r , YhJAY h a s managed t o o b t a i n
can't
As w i t h a l 1 o f
leave
it
as
t h e p r o d u c t i o n s which YWAY d o e s .
work
of
art.
at
the
end
there
"they
is
an
i f t h e y l o v e God.
From d a y one t h e c h i l d r e n a r e
i s r e f e r r e d t o as llboot-camp.
Basically.
w i t h i n two t o t h r e e w e e k s t h e c h i l d r e n l e a r n a l 1 the s o n g s o f t h e i r
summer program.
p u r g e the k i d s of
their
a f t e r n o o n and e v e n i n g . "
past
s i n s and
then
rehearsal
in
the
too
old
W e could t r a v e l t h e world!."
for
King's
Kids,
people
enter
"DTS." o r
One quickly l e a r n s t h a t o n e c a n n o t
philosophy and
mission.
Basic
philosophy
to YWAM's
is
the
so-called "Potential
the
one's life on one's own. Rather, one will only have a good life if
one does "good works in order to please God.
'works' oriented.
This is completely
perfect will and God will allow you to l i v e a blessed life. If you
screw up. you only get a meagre existence.
increased quality of life."
one's way of thinking and how one views one's place in the world.
A
individuation. "
"al1 have to do the same. learn the same, [even] eat the same lunch
in the cafeteria."
YWA-Y.
to the ends of
the plays
- the tools of
a work of art, for one has been "programmed" to believe that one's
goal is "to expose everyone to the Gospel through the arts."
that this extreme does occur. As we have noted, the attitude which
considers the art of theatre to be a useful and effective tool is
I1l9 Werner ROSS, c i t e d i n W i I l ehad Paul E c k e r t , " E i n Mann f r
j e d e J a h r e s z e i t : Z u r S i t u a t i o n des c h r i s t l ichen T h e a t e r s h e u t e , " i n
Karl R i c h t e r , W i 1 1 ehad Pau7 Eckert and O t t o A . Di 1 schnei d e r , U n t e r
dem 7eeren Himme 7 ? D r e i V o r t r a g e ber C h r i s t 7 i c h e s Theater heute,
K o l n e r B e i t r a g e , H e f t 9 , e d . , Presseamt des E r z b i s t u m s K o l n ( K o l n :
Wienand, I W S ) , 30.
widespread.
In contrast, there
are
those who
cal1
for
to be
the "secular
am
currently
thinking
about
how
the
concepts of
stage,
reinterpret itself for the altar, if even the altar today wants to
reach the ears and hearts of humanity."'''l
duty,
. . .today
however,
11"22
Himme7?, 56.
'12'
D i l schnei d e r ,
'12*
Werner
Ross,
J a h r e s z e i t , " 30.
cited
in
Eckert,
"Ein
Mann
, " 56.
fr
jede
life.
And
especially after the disasters of two world wars and recent ethnic
cleansing in Europe, wars which shook nations "to the very core,"
for European audiences Christian theatre "now seems 1 ike stage
charm and a scenery cord."1123
take it
seriously.
is
lodged
that
' desire
stinging
for the
In this, I must
picture of a rosy heaven, then al1 hope for more humane conditions
in the present will be irrelevant.
With
this in rnind,
practitioners of Christian
from
Adorno,
pronouncing
moral
tenets,
A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 329.
394
the
measures
of
Revealing the
to
agree
with
what
happens
on
stage.,,1128
Both,
the enemy.
The
- - - -
If
49.
Ibid.
Zn
response
to
the
p r e v a l ence
of
p o l it i c a l
theatre,
D i l s c h n e i d e r c i t e s S i e g f r i e d Melchi nger who w r o t e : " T h e a t r e i s made
w i t h t a 1 e n t and n o t w i t h H e r b e r t Marcuse.
[ S i e g f r i ed M e 1 c h i n g e r ,
C h r i s t und We7t, 51 (1970), no p . , c i t e d i n I b i d . ]
the closeness of poli tically and religiously mot ivated scripts. for
here we see blatant polit ical manipulation
and specifically.
Passion Play
of
Oberammergau.
In
1932
the
community
of
The
community had already recognized for years that not only was the
text as a whole insufficient, but that its real difficulty lay with
the
hidden
motivation. "11*'
promotion
of
an
"anti-semitism of
Christian
The
''*'
'l3O
"Theses
pon Art
Although
it
may
be
As
Dilschneider
argues
that
there
may
continue
to
be
Adorno,
""
''Theses Upon
. A 1 1
D i 1schnei d e r ,
" T h e a t e r u n t e r dem 1 e e r e n H i m m e l
397
,"
.
48.
is
"What
The
of
must
preaching.. . . [Institute
scholars
recognize
that]
Christian content made visible in images was the goal and has
Persona1 c o n v e r a t i on,
(Used by p e r m i s s i o n . )
M a r b u r g , Germany,
October,
1995.
The
cosmos (Bildkosmos)
...[
and] i t obeys no
foreign
law. "'13'
What
contemporary church is
this
means
in
the
of
the
context
preach
. . . [and]
~lthough "art
They
formative structure of
their
dominat ing
Mertin insist
that a pastor who chooses to bring art into h i s preaching must not
be asked so much why he has done this, but rather, and "much more
so, whether he is not misusing art for purposes which are foreign
to art.
111141
the image may have offered to the context of the church has through
this dominating tendency been nullified.
Insti tute research, especially under the direct ion of Schwebel
(who has
been
there since
1980),
has
focused precisely
on
has any place in the context of the officia1 church today, it must
-
--
I b i d . , 230.
M e r t i n c a u t i o n s p a s t o r s who t r y t o g e t a C h r i s t i a n message o u t
of any w o r k o f modern a r t f o r t h e sake o f t h e i r homi ly and g i v e s
t h e f o l 1 owi ng as an exampl e : "Whoever approaches a modern p a i n t i n g
o f a woman w i t h a c h i l d and assumes i t i s s p e a k i n g o f t h e l o v e of
m i s u s e s t h e p a i n t i n g and p r o v e s h i m s e l f t o be an
Christ,
iconoclast." [Ibid.]
'ldDI b i d .
'14'
I b i d . , 229.
art. As Schwebel states: "Art which merely gives up its own wishes
and exhausts its effectiveness
something
other]
has
already
given
up
its
service
[of
autonomy.,,1142
- Cnbequeme Autonomie
( L'Bcomfortable
Art
- Uncornfortable -4utonomy).
The exhibition was begun as a way to raise money for the home for
handicapped adults run by the Protestant congregation in Oflingen.
Artists were simply invited to submit works of art for this purpose
'
H
E B a h r , P o i e s i s : Theologische Unteruchung der K u n t
( S t u t t g a r t , 1971 ) , 19, ci ted in Schwebel , Autonome Kunst i m Raum
der K i r c h e , 4 1 .
' l r r A l t h o u g h t h e artists were n o t t o l d to c r e a t e a r t w h i c h
would be sa1 eable, t h e f a c t r e m a i n s , t h a t t h e a r t was to be used to
rai se money.
know t h a t t h e i r a r t w i l l be t r e a t e d w i t h r e s p e c t and is g e n u i n e l y
T h i s p a r t i c u l a r e x h i b i t i o n e x e m p l i f ies how and
a p p r e c i a t e d as a r t .
art
as
opposed
to
following
the
negative
mode1 o f
r e a l i s r n , a r g u e s Schwebel, which s u b o r d i n a t e s a r t
to a
socialist
r o l e of
He contends,
i n f a c t , t h a t t h e p h i l o s o p h i c a l a p p r o a c h o f s o c i a l i s t realism t o
art
is
analogous
to
relationship to art.
"effectively
the
history
of
the
Christian
church's
S o c i a l i s t realism a l s o uses a r t i n o r d e r t o
communicate
ideological
its
propaganda. "1145
e l a b o r a t e s upon t h i s analogy:
strong case f o r
a t t i t u d e towards a r t .
Indeed,
if
t h e c h u r c h t o change
it
is not
t h e goal of
its
the
C h r i s t i a n c h u r c h t o p a t t e r n i t s e l f a f t e r a s y s t e m which shows no
r e s p e c t f o r p e r s o n s o r t h i n g s i n its r u t h l e s s d o m i n a t i o n of them
f o r i t s own p u r p o s e s , then n e i t h e r s h o u l d t h e c h u r c h c o n t i n u e t o
follow t h i s p a t t e r n i n i t s treatment of a r t .
-- -
--
- - -
1145 Schwebel
The c h u r c h ought t o
--
Ibid.
402
r e c o g n i z e t h a t in i t s own t r a d i t i o n a l approach t o a r t , as in t h e
case o f s o c i a l i s t realism. " i d e o l o g y d i c t a t e i d ] and a r t had t o bend
and
submit
undeniable
itself
sirnilarity
approach t o a r t
firmly
believes
[ a p p r o p r i a t e l y ] . ,, 1147
between
throughout
that
the
Marxist
light
of
the
aesthetic
and
the
in
the h i s t o r y o f t h e church,
"[i]t
should
become
obvious,
Schwebel
one
that
r e f i n e d means
Ibid.,
f o r c i n g it
without
t o a p o s i t i o n of
with
what
ever
subordination.
,,il48
49.
Members of the church must corne to appreciate art not for its
ability to "bring to life the content of the sermon. to give a bit
In fact. he continues.
Another
participant
in
the
Oflingen
exhibition
It is
not preach the gospel has a right to a place in the context of the
church.
Horst
Ibid.
"" I b i d . , 1 4 .
chap.
Such exhibitions in
The autonomy
. . . is
if one
insists on
re-
introducing art into church buildings, one also runs the risk of
art regressing to a "devotional item and religious kitsch."
He
Knap,
"beauty and
Such
"''
zur
Ibid.,
44.
In
are glimpsed.
"alwags
B u t , acknowledges Schwebel, s u c h i n t i m a t i o n s a r e
broken,
precisely i n
unfinished
and
their b r o k e n n e s s ,
never
that
d e f i n i t e . il59
tt
It
is
they are n e v e r t h e l e s s , a
Vorschein ( a n a p p e a r a n c e - i n a d v a n c e ) of t h e f u t u r e p o s s i b i l i t y o f
a n o t h e r r e a l i t y which is n o t yet.
life
and
thought
and
people
F o r a m i d s t a present i n which
have
been
"reduced
to
things
...a
Arguing a l m g t h e l i n e s o f Adorno,
'"*
fbid.,
36.
Ibid.,
83.
present.
R e a l i t y d i c t a t e s and a r t must l e n d i t s s u p p o r t t o e a c h
d i s a s t r o u s d i c t a t e d consequence.
I n autonomous a r t . [ h o w e v e r , ] t h e
time of t h e s e r v a n t h o o d t o r e a l i t y i s d e f i n i t e l y p a s t . ,! 1161
A s p e r Horkheimer, Schwebel and M e r t i n n o t e "how much o f t h a t
which u s e d t o be spoken b y .
b u t h a s s i n c e been abandoned by t h e
contemporary autonomous a r t
i s t o have a p l a c e i n t h e
contemporary c o n t e x t of t h e c h u r c h , t h i s s h o u l d n o t r e s u l t i n a r t
being f o r c e d t o abandon i t s autonomy f o r subrnission t o t h e r u l e o f
" a t h e o l o g i c a l heteronorny.
In fact,
t h e e p a r a t i o n of
art
a r t i s " a f i r s t s t e p on
t h e way t o autonomy.
~ h ep r e m i s e
I b i d . , 84.
"Kunst i m K o n t e x t K i r c h e ,
"
"
chap. i n
234.
almost
completely
artistic autonomy.
Al though
after WWII in Germany art has not been allowed to serve a fascist
propaganda, the p r e v a i l i n g
this or
ideological pattern.
to
follow a
set
to help the tired masses to g a i n new strength and to get away from
1165 A d o r n o ,
"What National
426.
Ibid.
Ibid.
I b i d . , 427.
If art is created
to meet this need, art will have to be created "to please the
customer, a sort of pseudo-Americanization,"
contends Adorno.
turned
realm
''''
Ibid.
I b i d.
428.
and admired and enjoyed for the sake of its uniqueness, not for its
inherent qualities as a work of art.
not safe:
In the last [number] of years, tirne and again. there has been
the danger of sentimentalizing Beckett. In self-defence
we have been driven to the point of convincing ourselves that
and fear, rather
his plays are not really full of nxie
[they are] basically insanely cornical.)iJr4
In addition, Cv'aiting for Godot has become a "modern classic."
1964 revival performance in London was favourably received
Its
in
The
one fault cited with this script is that "its meaning and symbolism
were a little too obvious.1,1175
M e i stermann,
Il7'
H a r o l d Hobson, q u o t e d i n D e i r d r e B a i r , " N i c h t s
komischer als das Ungl ck" T h e a t e r Heute 4 ( A p r i 1 l986), 1 9 .
ist
to how
to
resist these
dangers
are
still
In
He
..
1176 Adorno,
"What N a t i o n a l S o c i a l i s r n h a s done t o
428.
I b i d . , 429.
the a r t s , "
cannot
take in a radically
~ h ecrucial
As
in hi "Theses U p o n
Ibid.
With regard t o music's constant reworking o f t h e t r a d i t i o n o f
music,
Brown, i n h i s r e v i e w o f
P a d d i s o n ' s s t u d y o f Adorno's
a e s t h e t i c t h e o r y o f music, states: " . . . t h e a u t h e n t i c composer does
not f a 1 1 back on any p u t a t i v e t r a n s h i s t o r i c a l laws o f music, b u t
t r i e s t o meet the e x p r e s s i v e demands o f h i s t i m e by a c t i v e l y
transforming t h e backlog o f bankrupt materials
f o r i n s t a n c e , by
s t r e t c h i n g e a r l ie r r u 1 e s t o t h e b r e a k i n g p o i n t and beyond.
.B u t
n o t h i p g o f f e r s h i m [ t h e a u t h e n t i c composer] any guidance f o r how t o
advance. " [Brown, r e v i e w o f A d o r n o ' s A e s t h e t i c s o f Music, by Max
Paddison, 2 1 3 - 2 1 4 . 1
Adorno,
''O
A e s t h e t i c Theory,
Adorno, " P r e u p p o s i t i o n s ,
..
369.
"
in N o t e s t o Literature, V o l . II,
103.
1181
429.
Adorno,
Art and Religion Today," here, also, Adorno maintains that "[a]n
artist who still deserves that name should proclairn nothing, not
even humanism. il82
1,
in
The
religious content of art has al1 but withered and fallen away. And
any art which attempts to resurrect the possibility of expressing
is
to
cross
the
boundaries
of
the
Bilderverbot.
Ibid.
Adorno,
Ir
678.
To subordinate
In this
because i t is expected
As if to
'lsd
D i 1 schnei d e r ,
,"
48.
yielding to any pressure of social organizations of our time religious, political or otherwise - whose domination is becoming
more insidious and ever more overwhelming.
If Adorno had lived pas t 1969 he would have seen how even that
art which was for him the "paradigm of modern art in generalw also
continued to evolve; the theatre of Samuel Beckett explored new
forms.
Beckett, always an
Adorno,
429.
"What
N a t i o n a l S o c i a l i s m has done t o t h e
native
arts,
tf
- and subverted
Germany
means
of
artistic
construction,""*?
Beckett.
the
if he would
television
television.
those
I n light of Adorno's
thorough dislike of mass culture, one could on the one hand suggest
that Adorno would be disappointed that Beckett caved in to the
power of television.
Between 1969
productions w i t h t h e
The f i v e i n c l uded t h e
I I , Nacht und T r a u m e ,
and 1985 B e c k e t t d i r e c t e d f i v e t e l e v i s i o n
S u d d e u t s c h e r Rundfunk, b a s e d i n Stuttgart.
f o l l o w i ng: He Joe, G e i s t e r T r i o , Quadrat 1 &
a n d Was W o .
1189 Adorno,
429.
"
429.
Ir
On the other
Beckett ' s
productions Adorno
productions
describes
and
the
type
of
television
look
at
Not only did Beckett have control over his productions - he had the
good fortune to work. yes. collaboratively with a sympathetic
producer - but neither his material nor the resultant productions
follow established "rules of thumb. set patterns and mechanisms of
control" which would
expression. "
found
on
television.1191
Rather,
Beckett's
television
And in
'"'
I b i d . , 141.
"How to l o o k at t e l e ~ i i o n ,chap.
~~
in
method
by
continues this line of criticism arguing that not only will this
of
blue and
pink
may
be dulled by
t,
spectacles.
1195
In
Ilg3 I b i d . , 148.
Ibid.,
'lg5 I b i d .
147.
Adorno's
technically
advanced;
Beckett
must
demonstrates
this
is
be
possible
dissonant
resolves harmoniously .
If art
Al1
is
to
remain
the
in
reality
and
critique
reality's
Adorno,
A e t h e t i c T h e o r y , 27-8.
419
CONCLUSION
" I n the e n d , hope,
wres ted f rom real i ty
by negating i t , is the o n l y form
i n which t r u t h a p p e a r s W thou t hope,
the idea of t r u t h would be
scarcely even thinkable,
and it is the cardinal u n t r u t h ,
h a v f n g recognized existence to be bad,
t o presen t i t a s tr u
simply because it has been recognized."1
fh
'lg7
"Sacred
und .Aron."119d
The
essay
those who
This
line.
accomplish deeds
that
s u g g e s ts
proclaims
Adorno.
surpass
not
their
only
life and
biblical
und
opera,"
Moses
sou1
Aron.
t o his g r e a t
Like Yoe.
unfinished
Schonberg ' s
"courage i s n o t e q u a l t o t h e t a s k h e cannot r e f u s e .
For t o act as
the mouthpiece of the Almighty i s blasphemy f o r m o r t a l man. ,,1201
Schonberg w a s
unable
compelled t o w r i t e .
to complete
the
biblical
opera he
felt
Adorno's i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of t h i s i n c o m p l e t i o n
l e s s . "1202
the
artist
demand
aethetic
'Ig9
0O''
I b i d . , 225.
Ibid.
''''
Ibid.
'*O2
I b i d . , 226.
the work are "emasculatedw as the ideas are reduced to the limits
art.1204
Or, as Adorno
expressed
it
almost
twenty years
Adorno,
" 679.
120d I b i d . , 6 8 0 .
, 226-7.
' O6
Ibid.
I2O7
I b i d . , 239.
I2O8
Adorno,
"
679.
understood
form. "1209
in
terms
of
"the objective
of
the
o b j e c t i v e p r e c o n d i t i o n s of
content
preconditions
would
be
formed
the
p r e s e n t context
limits
priori
the
i n which
that
possibility
of
is no l o n g e r
h i s t o r i c a l c o n t e x t , then t o t r y t o c r e a t e s a c r e d m u s i c o r ta impose
s a c r e d c o n t e n t on t h e a r t of t h a t c o n t e x t w i l l not b e t o l e r a t e d Although Adorno s e e s i t as i n s p i r i n g t h a t t h e overwhelming power o f
Schonberg ' s a r t w a s a b l e t o "overcome t h e r e c a l c i t r a n t n a t u r e o f
h i s material"
he
admits t h a t
"[tloday o u r s e n s i b i l i t i e s
rebel
- that is the
'*O9
Adorno,
"Sacted Fragment,
I b i d . 228.
'*11
I b i d . , 240-1.
"
227.
. for to "thematize
1. Art:
If
one were to
. and
suggest that there remain perons for whom the sacred continues to
shape the o r d e r of reality, could one also argue that sacred art
would still be a possibility for them? If this were the case. one
could reconsider Dilschneider's suggestion that although religious
1212 I b i d .
240-1
l2I3 I b i d . , 243.
l2ld I b i d . , 229.
art "only accidentally," since such objects were f irst and forernost
ritual symbols?1216
after the cultic function and religious subject matter has fallen
away, what is left is art? Perhaps an appropriate way to approach
such
Adorno,
" 677.
revolutionary
ideals
in
favour
of
and
According to
art
into conforming to
the
--
1217 Marcuse, N e g a t i o n s ,
W.
to
one can
practices
of
people
reflects
the
And the
social-cultural
As
l2l9 M a r h a H e w i t t ,
"Ideology C r i t i q u e , Femi n i sm a n d t h e s t u d y
of Religion," 1 .
Adorno,
427.
But
the reasons given for the shaping of the order of existence and the
reasons for acting in a certain manner within that order are
abstract and ahistorical.
or denied.
Thu.
the
as well as
society's productive
is
lZ2'
1222 H e w i t t , t t I d e o l o g y c r i t i q u e ,
r e l i g i o n , t 1 25, n . #2.
f e m i n i s m and
the
study
of
And, 1 would suggest, that Christians who create art "as an avenue
for worship,
with the express purpose of making the form of art into a' form
which is precisely something other than art. The created object is
forms
of
To force art to be a
The
1223 Browne,
429
purport to critique. When these rnethods are made evident , then any
possible critique that might have been manifested in the art form
itself is nullified, for both the feminists and the Christians
involved have adopted the methods of the very structures they would
want to have change. And any effort to use art to directly bring
about change backfires, for to "instrumentalize art is to undercut
If
feminists and
Christians
principle
repressive
religion. w1225
and
emancipatory
impulses
which
structures
al1 that i t could be, may be the critical thinkers and the artists,
who have grasped the contradictions of the dialectic.
It is the
122' Adorno,
1225 H e w i t t ,
religion," 3.
A e t h e t i c T h e o r y , 442
"Ideology
critique,
f e m i n i s m and
the
study
of
The consciousnes of
the
critical thinker and artist sees through and reveals the material
and structural interests which the ideology of religion tries to
conceal in its legitirnation of the established of ficial order of
religion. Such critique is the opposite of the "rnentality of socalled realistic people, who orient themselves by the desiderata
and the offerings of existing institutions, and do not thereby
the
illusion
creatures. "122i
that
they
[the
institutions]
are
natural
"Presupposi ti o n s ,
431
101 .
disregard the fact that the critical voice has itself already moved
beyond the boundaries of the veil which the ideology of religion
of
ideology
1228 Adorno,
. . .conceal[ingJ
K i e r k e g a a r d , 85.
432
the
alternative
material
Since
to
its viewers
an alternative
the
risk
of
masking
an
alternative
In order to
ideology
the
in
Adorno
technocracy, linkages
that
reinforce
the
suspicion
that
1229 H e w i t t .
"Ideology
critique,
f e m i n i s r n and
the
study
of
religion," 3 .
Buck-Morss,
Adorno, N e g a t i v e D i a 7ectics, 1 4 5 .
Adorno, A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 3 9 7 .
I b i d . , 319.
as can be o t h e r w i s e s t a t e d : "There a r e t o o many v i a b l e
f o r d o i ng t h e h o r r e n d o u s . " [ " D a v i d , " whose m o t h e r - i n-1 a w
433
While
it is no longer art.
as art. The message distorts art and art does an injustice to the
message because it is not able to fully give itself over to the
ideology. For even when distorted, art qua art inherently defies
al1 attempts to make it into something which it is not. A work of
art remains something other than the empirical reality around it
and refuses in the core o f its being to be fully integrated.
The tension between art and "something heteronomous is the one
thing that works of art cannot will of themselves," yet it is "the
h i r e d a h i t - m a n to k i J I him.
Radio (19 May 1996).]
I n t e r v i e w on "Sunday M o r n i n g , "
123c Adorno,
A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 322.
1235 Adorno,
"Charmed Language,
1236 Adorno,
"Presuppoi t i on,
ft
208.
107.
CBC
II,
tension between art and its context ceases to exist, it is the end
of art.
art works are those that hurt, those that bring to light (through
the medium of expression and in historically determinate ways) what
is wrong with present social conditions.
may "hurt,"art is only art and in fact only ''becornes a work of art
It
to be "sick, eccentric, paranoa - indeed, ' m a d , ' " that the work
In the preent
Our experience of
of the
elements of
reality .
In
this
sense,
1238 Theodor W .
Adorno,
Literature, Vol. I I , 99.
" P r e s u p p o s i t io n s ,
"
in
Notes
to
1239 Adorno, M i n i m a M o r a T i a , 7 3 .
I n h i s study of A d o r n o ' s t h e o r y o f a r t , W o l i n w r i t e s : "A71
i m p o r t a n t a r t i s s o c i a l l y c r i t i c a l : by v i r t u e of i t s u t o p i a n
moment, i t s e r v e s as an enchanted m i r r o r held up t o a r e f r a c t o r y
r e a l it y t h a t c o n f r o n t s t h e l a t t e r w i t h t h e h i a t u s between i t s
p r o m i s e s and i t s t r u t h . " [Wol i n , "The D e - A e s t h e t i c i z a t i o n o f A r t , "
122.1
of
humane
the
against
the
pressure
of
domineering
to
the ever
forms which
evolving social-historical
express
not grasp
after
the
universal content, and the work which would be religious must not
strive to be religious. Rather, art must continue to be thoroughly
materially rnediated in its social-historical context.
1240 A d o r n o ,
Hohendahl
IrAutonorny o f A r t ,
436
"
144.
11.
Art
zu singen.
.,
1242,
t h e u n i v e r s a l , but l i k e P r o u s t c r e a t e d
" Fadensonnen
ber der grauschwarzen O d n i s .
E i n baum hoher Gedanke
g r e i f t s i c h den Lichtton: es s i n d
noch L i e d e r zu12@ngen jensei ts
d e r Menschen. "
The
c h o i c e of
beginning
with t h i s
poem seems t o
reflect
. II
( F r a n k f u r t am M a i n :
1243 Adorno, A e s t h e t i c T h e o r y , 4 4 4 .
'244 C e l a n ,
[cf.
art which
for
advertisements
world
the
which
does
through
not
seek
duplication
and
belief
commands
the
provocative
lie
silence,
but
1245 Adorno,
9 s A r t 1 i ghthearted?", 251.
1246 Theodor W .
1247 Adorno,
Adorno,
Prisms, 3 4 .
438
Music will be better, the more deeply it is able to express in the antinomies of its own formal language - the exigency of
the social condition and to cal1 for change through the coded
language of suffering.
It is not for m u s i c to stare in
helpless horror at society. It fulfils its social function
more precisely when it presents social problems through its
own material and according to its own forma1 laws - problems
which music C O
ins within itself in the i n n e r m o s t cells of
its technique.fi&
the
inhumane
rarefied
light.,,1250
I n l i g h t of
Adorno,
1249 Wol i n ,
1250 I b i d .
439
" 122.
silence Auschwitz?"12"
To do so would
mean
As
the voice of
suffering and the desire for that which has never-yet-been - even
after Auschwitz, admits Adorno - art must speak.
K e i n e r War:
1252 I b i d . , 362.
lZs3
A d o r n o , Aesthetic T h e o r y , 4 4 6 .
Zur
Geschichte
des
Structure of Biblioqra~hv
Theodor W. Adorno
I .1 Primary sources
1.2 Secondary sources
Frankfurt School
2.1 Primary sources
2.2 Secondary sources
Ideology
3.1 Marx - primary sources
3.2 Ideology - general
Philosophy and Cultural Criticism
4.1 Bureaucracy and Administration
4 . 2 Philosophy and Cultural Criticism - general
Religion
5.1 Academic Study of Religion
5.2 Religious Organization
5.3 Religion - general
Art and Philosophy of -t
6.1 Hegel's ~ h i i o s o ~of
h ~Art - primary and secondary sources
6.2 Philosophy of Art - general
Theatre
8.1 Samuel Beckett
8.2 Theatre - general
Feminist A r t
9.1 Feminist Theatre
9.2 Feminism and Ferninist Aesthetics
10. Newspaper articles
11. Lectures
12. Videorecordings
1. Theodor W. Adorno
1.1 Primary Sources
Adorno, Theodor W . "The A c t u a l i t y of Philosophy. '' T e l o s 3 1 (Sprinc
1977), 1 2 0 - 1 3 3 -
on t h e i r r a t i o n a l i n culture.
Edite by Stephen Crook.
London and New York: Routledge, i994.
e t a l . Aesthetics and P o l i tics. Translation
e d i t o r , Ronald Taylor. London: NLB, 1977; Verso e d i t i o n , fifth
Vol. 11 Noten zur Literatur. Edited by Rolf Tiedemann. 1970Translated in two volumes as Notes to Literature, Vol.1 by
Shierry Weber Nicholsen. New York: Columbia University Press,
1991; and as Notes to L i t e r a t u r e . Vol.11 by Shierry Weber
Nicholson. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
Vol. 12 Philosophie der Neuen Muik. Edited by Rolf Tiedemann.
1958; 1975.
Vol. 13 Die musikalischen Monographien: Wagner; Mahler; Berg.
Edited by Gretei Adorno and Rolf Tiedemam- 1971.
Vol. 15 Komposition frlr den Film (gemeinsam mit Hanns E i s l e r ) .
Der ge treue Korrepe t i tor. Edited b y Rolf Tiedemam. 1976.
35
( S p r i n g 1 9 7 8 ) , 128-164.
The Kenyolr
Sources
3 4 (Winter 1977-
78), 157-166.
J o h Benjamins, 1984.
Cornell, Drucilla. "Ethical Message of Negative Dialectics . Social
Concept 4.1 (December 1987), 3-37.
Floyd, Wayne Whitson, Jr. Theology a n d the Dialectic of Otherness.
O n Reading Bonhoeffer and Adorno. Lanham: University Press of
America, 1988.
"Transcendence
in
the
Light
of
Redemption: Adorno and the Legacy of Rosenzweig and Benj amin. "
J o u r n a l of the Ameri can Academy of R e 1 igion LX1 - 3 ( Fa11 19 93) ,
Telos 3 1
'The Aging of
. " Telos
Verlag, 1988.
Knapp, Gerhard P . T h e o d o r W . A d o r n o . Berlin : Colloquium Verlag Otto
H. Hess, 1980.
Knapp, Marcus. 'Wahr ist nur, w a s nicht in d i e s e W e l t passt.' D i e
Erbsihdenlehre a l s &satzpunkt eines D i a l o g u e s mit Theodor W.
Adorno. Wrzburg: Echter Verlag, 1983.
Lenzen,
Verena.
"Sprache
und
Schweigen
nach
Auschwitz."
In
l1
der K u n t : Zur
Genese und K r i t i k e i n e r brgerlichen Ka t e g o r i . Frankfurt a m
Main : Suhrkamp , 19 72 .
Ado-mo.
Berlin:
Verlag, 1971.
Sewing, Eva-Maria. Grenzen und Mglichkeiten der Aaomoschen
A s t h e t i k heute. B e r n : Peter Lang, 1991.
Theory
Snow,
Benjamin.
Philosophy. '
Religion*"
of
T e l o s 63
(Spring
Frankfurt School
2 - 1 P r h r y Sources
Main :
Brecht, by &a
Bostock. Introduction by Stanley Mitchell.
London: NLB, 1973.
Horkheimer, Max. Eclipse of Reason. [1947] New York: The Seabury
Press, 1974.
Cri t i c a l Theozy: Seiected Essays. Translated by
Matthew J. O'Connel1 et al. New York: Continuum, 1989.
(Winter
and
Its
A t e m a t h :
Stephen. Modernis t Radicalism
Foundationalism and Anti - F o u d a tionalism i n Radical Social
Theory. New Y o r k : Routledge, 1991.
Crook,
Revol u tionary
Honneth, &el und Albrecht Wellmer. Die Frankfurter Scnule und die
Folgen. Symposium Proceedings. Deceniber 1980 in Ludwigsburg.
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1986.
Jay, Martin. The D i a l e c t i c a l Imagination: A History o f the
Frankfurt School a n d the I n s t i t u t e of Social Research, 19231950. Boston: Little Brown, 1973.
3.1 Marx
primazr sources
Verlg, 1985.
- L i t e r a t u r e and A r t : Selections
from t h e i r e a r l y wri tings. New York : International Publishers,
. nvanglisation e t Propagande." L a R e w e de
l'vanglisation 83 (May-June 1959) : 146-162.
. Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes. New
York: Alfred A. Knopf, R a n a o m House, 1965.
Geertz , C l i f f o r d , " Ideology as a Cultural System, " The
Interpretation of C u l t u r e s . New York: Basic Books, 1973.
Gyergy, Markus. "Concepts of Ideology i n M a r x .
C a n a d i a n Journal
of Poli t i c a l and Social Theory, Ideology/Power VI1 1.1-2
4.
and
social
Ferouson,
Herbst ,
Bureaucracy.
Ltiden : Martinus
4.2
Alain. Le Citoyen c o n t r e
Sagittaire, 1 9 2 6 .
aeneral
les Pouvoirs.
oaris:
editions
du
Chicago Press,
1958.
Weber,
S . 1 A c a d d c S tudy of Reliaion
in
(Winter
. R e l i g i o n and T r u t h : T o w a r d s an A l t e r n a t i v e
Paradigm f o r the Study of Religion. The Hague: Mouton, 1981.
. " ' W h y the Academic Study of Religion?' Motive and
Method in the Study of Religion." Religious S t u d i e s 24
(December 1988), 403-413.
and
l1
Conce-T: A
(1955), 1 5 - 2 5 .
Pamphlet Series 3
(19561, 14-19.
Reid, Clyde. T h e Gad-Evaders. New York: H a r p e r and Row, 1966.
Schmauch, Werner. "The Prophetic Office in the Church." Concern: A
Pamphlet Series 5 ( 1 9 5 8 ) , 68-76.
Shank, David A, and John Howard Yoder. Wiblicism and the Church."
Concern: A Pamphlet Series 2 (1955), 2 6 - 6 4 .
Gibson. R e l i g i o u s Identity: A S t u d y
O r g a n i z a t i o n . New York: Macmillan, 1 9 6 8 .
Winter,
of
Religious
Imagination-
Philadelphia:
Hewitt, M a r s h a .
Scharlemam,
Robert,
editor.
Nega tion
and
Theology.
Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1992.
Smart , N i ~ i a n
. The Phenomenon of R e 1 igion . New York : Macmilian,
1973.
Weber,
6.1 Hesel's
Philosophy of A r t
prima-
"Hegel: Philosophy
Gethmam-iefert, Annemarie and Barbara StemmricbK6hler. "Faust:
und
die
die
'Absolute Philosophische
Trag6dieJ
'Gesellschftliche Artigkeitf des est-estlichen Divan: Zu
Editionsproblenien der sthetikvorlesungen. " Hegel - S t u d i e n 18
(1983), 2 3 - 6 0 .
The R e v i e w of
Philosophy of A r t
qeneral
Barzun, Jacques. The U s e and Abuse of Axt. The A.W. Mellon Lecutes
in the Fine Arts, 1 9 7 3 . Washington, D.C. : The National Gallery
Koppe ,
Franz . Grundbegriffe
Suhrkamp , 19 8 3 ,
der
s t h e ~ i k . Frnkfuri,
am
Main:
Sartre,
la
littrature?"
Paris:
Eptinc;,
Gr%,
S p i r i tua1
presented
at:
the
ACR-Corifercnce,
Images. Unpublished paper
Berkeley, California. 27-31 July 1 9 9 5 .
B l o o r , R.H.U.
Brome,
Plays. London:
~eneral
. Transfiguration:
Daiches , David. God and the Poe ts. Oxford : Oxford University Press,
1984 -
Glendenning, Frank, editor . The Church and the Arts. London: SCM,
1960.
Howes , Graham. tlReligious Art and Religious Belief . " ARTS 5.1 (Fall
1992) : 11-16.
J o n e s , Carolyn M.
(Winter 1991-92) : 3 - 6 .
Kelsey, David. "The Arts and Theological Conversation. " ARTS 2.1
(Fall l989), 7-9.
Martin, James Alfred. B e a u t y and Holiness: The D i a l o g u e between
Aesthetics and Religion. Princeton, N. J . : Princeton University
Press, 1990.
Martin, F. David. A r t and t h e R e l i g i o u s Experience. Lewisburg,
Penn.: Bucknell University Press, 1972.
Pattison, George. l'Art, Modernity and Faith. " ARTS 4.2 (Winter
1991-92, 3-6.
Editicns de CERF,
1952.
8.
Theatre
1952.
1958.
creneral
. T h e Language of D r m a . D r a r n a as a Language.
Celebrity Lecture Series. Stratford Shakespearean Festival,
August 14, 1983.
Fetscher, Irving. Wertolt Brecht and Arnerica. Salmagundi 10/11,
T h e Legacy of the G e m a n Refugee I n t e l l e c t u a l s Wall 1969Winter 197O), 265-280.
Feyerband, Paul K. "The Theater as an instrument of tne C r i t i c i s r n
of I d e ~ l o g i e s .Inquiry
~
10 (Autumn, 19671, 298-312.
9. Feminist A r t
9.1 Feminist Theatre
Austin, Gayle. Feminist Theories for Dramatic Cri ticim. Ann Arbor :
University of Michigan Press, 1990, 1993.
Bennett, Susan. ' ' P o l i t i c s of the Gaze: Challenges in Canadian
Womenrs Theatre. II Canadian Theatre Review 59 (Summer 1989),
11-14.
Bessai, Diane. "A Survey Report: Wornen, Feminism and Prairie
Theatre." C a n a d i a n T h e a t r e R e v i e w 4 3 (Sumner 1 9 8 5 ) , 19-30.
540.
McFarland, 1980.
Logan, Christie. uPerforming Ideology: From the Margins of
Theatrical Discourse." Text and Performance Quarterly 10
(1990), 331-36.
Malpede, Karen, editor. Women in Theatre: Compassion and Hope. New
York: Drama Book Publishers, 1983.
Alcof f ,
Linda
and
Elizabeth
Potter, editors.
Epistemologies. New York: Routledge, 1093.
Ferninlist
Armatage,
Ann
Arbor:
Feminist
Associated French Press, "Beckett best known for Godot. " KitchenerWaterloo Record (26 December 1989), A (11).
Hildebrandt, Ken. T o n f lict and Connections." Conference of
Mennoni tes in Canada Nexus 1.5. Supplement to Mennoni te
Reporter 24.24 (12 December 19941, 4.
Kapica. Jack. "Churches told to t r y the ol hard sell: 'Customersr
lost, author w a r n s . " The lobe and Mail (9 September 1993), A
(1-2).
The Globe a n d
The Globe a n d
11. Lectures
Endres, Ria. "Die Poesie der Stimme : Am Anf ang war die Stimme . "
Special lecture on the occasion of Samuel Beckett's eightieth
birthday. Philipps University, Marburg, Germany. 16 *ri1
1986.
12. Videorecordincrs
IlMartin Luther King, Jr.'
IMAGE EVALUATION
TEST TARGET (QA-3)
ci
111A
APPLIED
L;
L ,
LLL
Illg
111112
2 IMAGE. lnc
1653 East Main Street