Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-102, No. 3, March 1983
1. 61 km
16.1 km
V.-
160 km
Station A
Station B
INIRDUCTION
SW Capability
CALCULATION PROCEDURE
Size
82 SM 341-6
A paper recommended and approved by the
IEEE Transmission and Distribution Committee of the
4-J
- A
0)
-B
SI
-C
=I
80 km
Station
A
Fig. 2.
Faults Close to
Station
B
vs.
capability
Station
573
46%
C
4%
*-
46%
-88%
4%
>S
12%
n,g.
ut
20%
26%
50
81%
20%
hE
19%
Mirnorca ACSR
40
14
0 CL
05
20
10
100
Fig. 4.
station.
574
11%
37%
37%
81%
11%
4%
Fig. 6.
24%
81%
20%
%%S
19%
Tower
of the fault
the effect of
fault clearing
it dictates the
Additionally,
On
fram
a
much as
is
capability
on
Subsequent to fault
occurrence,
generator
reactance changes with time. In the first few cycles
the generator
subtransient
following the fault,
reactance,
X"d, accurately reflects the generator
reactance. After a number of cycles have passed
(dependent on the machine time constant), the transient
reactance, X'd, can be used to represent the generator.
Historically, the SW has been rated for backup clearing
times and the X'd value has been used to determine the
fault current. There is some error in this approach
because the effective current applied to the SW should
reflect the higher fault current present during the
first few cycles.
However, if the machine time constant is low the error is small.
Fast Excitation Systems
12%
Faulted
System Reactance
20%
24%
Fig. 7.
FAULT CURRENTS
19%
Towers
results
indicate
that
the
fast
exciters
do
proper
approach
for
575
1.8
1.7
I rms -
Fast Exciters
Fault Initiation
1.6
ac, rms
1.5.
---1-.onventional
Exciters
K
1. 4-
1.3
Time
30 Cycles
1.0_2
100
10
Time (cycles)
Fig. 9.
Effect of DC on SW Current
an
DC Current Contribution
Summary
It is suggested that SW requirements be determined
based on backup clearing times. If fast exciters are
not used in the system, then the X'd value may be used
to determine the fault current, although the higher
fault current during the first few cycles should be
taken into' account. If fast exciters are used, then
accurate dynamic simulations should be used to
determine the fault current. Alternatively, the X"d
reactance value could be used to approximate the
results. It is further suggested that the effect of dc
offset be considered for faults near stations.
{JA2Ds/pct l/t
ln[l +
(0
0.)]} /2
(1)
where
1)
2)
3)
4)
resistivity is
function of temperature.
To reflect
the effect -of specific heat as a
function of temperature would complicate the equation.
However, it 'is known that if specific heat as a
576
A~W
8.53x10-6 15 .9xlO-6
0.0036
0.0035
400.
400.
40.
40.
6.66
7.86
0.118
0.118
P (ohm-cm)
a (/OC)
0 (OC)
go (OC)
D (gm/cc)
s (cal/grrC)
40
a'
- -
T = _
--
1o
1 1
0.01
_77
REFERENCES
~~IZ
i(t) a VV2
.1..0
10
APPENDIX A
EFFECr OF DC COMPONENT
l-1
0.1
5
L~~~-4
_i:S
--
1(
A_ _ 1141-
a'
2.87xlO-6
0.0040
200.
40.
2.70
0.210
AST_
2- CGuinea
U4
ACSR
EHS
15 20
seconds
cycles
[sin (t + $) - sin(/)eat]
where a =
VIV
Fault Duration
Fig. 10.
R + jwL
+i
Fiqure 1A
The rms
current is:
irms - [ Vt i2 dt11/2
When , = f71/2 the fully offset dc
represented and the integral result is:
'rms
ac,rms
Vm sin ut
e2 -t
CONCLUSIONS
the current
condition
rut + Tr
f2w
-4
-eat
sin
is
2
t
a cost
wt)
=I
k
ac,rms
The value "k" has been evaluated for
a and T, and the results are given in
the paper.
various values of
the main body of
577
APPENDIX B
SYS[EM DATA
The source impedances used for the analysis were:
Station A
Station B
0.4 Percent
infinite bus
<R
0
0 3
0.07752
jo.66073
0.05683 0.07753
jO.33937 jO .66071
SW 4
R2
1
0
S 0 1
0.2
>
RTFR
Figure 1B
Tower and Fault Representation
CONDUCTOR
CDNDUCIOR
-jO .25838
578
Discussions
Donald T. Jones (Copperweld Bimetallics Group, Pittsburgh, PA): The
capability of a shield wire to carry fault currents safely is becoming increasingly important as fault current magnitudes increase. The author,
therefore, is to be commended for undertaking his study and sharing his
findings in this paper.
The values of fault current vs. fault duration for EHS steel obtained
by the use of equation (I) in the paper do not, in the opinion of the discusser, seem to agree with the values shown in Figure 10. It appears that
the calculated values are appreciably lower than Figure 10 indicates.
The author's comments regarding this apparent difference between
equation (1) values and Figure 10 values for steel will be appreciated.
Also, reference (3) of this paper provides fault current data resulting
from tests performed on steel, aluminum-clad steel and ACSR shield
wires. The test values for the aluminum-clad steel agree fairly closely
with those values shown in Figure 10 of the paper. However, the values
provided for the EHS steel in reference (3) are significantly lower than
those shown in Figure 10. This difference would seem to confirm the
discrepancy between the values calculated by equation (1) and the plotted values of Figure 10. The author's comments would also be welcomed on this point.
Manuscript received August 12, 1982.
Results
TFR Case
20 ohm
10 ohm
3 ohm
To Sta. B
7532
8193
8197
km from Sta. A
August 1982.
2) R. Rudenberg, Transient Performance of Electric Power Systems,
Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 1967, pp. 355-366.
Manuscript received August 17, 1982.
-~~~i
I
Guinea
.,,
20
-Minorca,-
111711Y6A
11]
~~~~7#6AW
LI
II
_
inc
1.
EH
10
iI
Lu8
______
f~~~
T
inch
3/j inc
1: EHS3
0.1
EFault Duration
To Sta. A
16481
15165
12988
REFERENCES
0.01
TABLE A
To Structure
1145
1922
4304
4i
Input
Gen A
Gen B
Total Fault
25111
25245
25413
10
15 20
1.0 secads
cycles
Figure 10
REFERENCE
1. Transmission Line Reference Book, 345 kV and Above, Electric
Power Research Institute, 1975.
Manuscript received September 16, 1982.