Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
also dissolved the parties' absolute community property relations and approved the
Agreement on Distribution of Communal Property, incorporating the same as part
of the Decision; that it is the intention of Anna Marie F. Padilla to transfer the title
covering the subject condominium unit in her name, as per the parties' agreement.
In reply, please be informed that this office ruled in BIR Ruling No.
DA-435-00 dated December 18, 2000, that no donation had taken place when
former spouses appropriate to themselves separately the properties which belong to
their community property as a consequence of the liquidation of the partnership.
The parties merely segregated and adjudicated for their own individual and
separate ownership the properties which, from the celebration of their marriage,
rightfully belong to them equally. (BIR Ruling No. 220-83 dated December 8,
1983) In the instant case, since the parties merely appropriated to themselves their
respective shares in the community property, such appropriation of the properties
covered by the Agreement on distribution thereof is not subject to donor's tax.
Moreover, the transfer of the condominium unit to Ms. Padilla is also not
subject to capital gains tax, as such transfer is equivalent to a conveyance but
without any monetary consideration, made in compliance with the court's Decision
granting the parties' agreement for the distribution of communal property (BIR
Ruling No. DA-092-01 dated May 6, 2001). Neither is the said transfer subject to
documentary stamp tax since the monetary consideration in the conveyance of said
condominium unit from which tax shall be based is wanting.
HETDAa
Legal Service
Copyright 2014