Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
9.
2. A
10.
3. D
11.
4. A
12.
5. B
13.
6. C
14.
7. B
15.
8. D
1324
1356 in any order
2631
1234 or 1243
4132
369
1.46
352
112
Heat the beaker containing the solution until all the water has
evaporated.
Cool the beaker and its contents at room temperature; reweigh the
beaker and its contents using the electronic balance.
62.51 g
63.63 g
159.21 g/mol
10.00 mL
b. Use the information shown above to calculate the molar concentration of the
copper(II) sulfate solution that was tested in this experiment.
Sample Response
m = 63.63 g 62.51 g
= 1.12 g
M = 159.21 g/mol
n=?
1L
V = 10.00 mL
1000 mL
= 0.010 00 L
C =?
n=
m
M
1.12 g
159.21 g/mol
= 0.007 034 734 mol
=
n
V
0.007 034 734 mol
=
0.010 00 L
= 0.703 mol/L
C=
The molar concentration of the copper(II) sulfate solution was 0.703 mol/L.
Score
Scoring Description
4
Standard
of
Excellence
The response is well organized and addresses all the major points of the question.
Scientific concepts are correct, well organized, and the explanation demonstrates
thorough understanding and logical consistency of thought and use appropriate
scientific vocabulary. The data are accurately and completely analyzed.
The response is organized and addresses most the major points of the question.
Scientific concepts are identified, organized, and the explanation may demonstrate
a correct understanding. The data are accurately and completely analyzed.
2
Acceptable
Standard
The response is organized and addresses most the major points of the question.
Scientific concepts are identified, disorganized, and reflect correct
understanding. The data are partially analyzed.
The response is superficial and addresses some the major points of the question.
Scientific concepts are identified, but the explanation may demonstrate an
incorrect understanding. The data are incorrectly analyzed.
The response does not address any of the major points of the question at an
appropriate level for a 20-level course.
Science 20 2006 Alberta Education (www.education.gov.ab.ca)
b. List two safety features that are present in the car or that could be added during
its modification. Use the principles of force, momentum, and impulse to
describe how these features would contribute to increased safety for the
occupants of the car if it were involved in a collision. State one risk associated
with each safety feature that is identified.
Sample Response
Safety
feature
Seat belts
Air bag
Scientific principles
Contribution to
increased safety
Decrease in
injuries and/or
fatalities
Decrease in
injuries and/or
fatalities
Padded
dashboard
Collapsible
steering
column
Decrease in
injuries and/or
fatalities
Decrease in
injuries and/or
fatalities
Score
Scoring Description
4
Standard
of
Excellence
The response is well organized and addresses all the major points of the question.
The descriptions and/or explanations of these concepts are correct and reflect
thorough understanding and logical consistency of thought. The scientific
principles related to the function of the safety features are clearly explained. The
interrelationships among science, technology, and society are thoroughly understood.
An insightful risk is stated.
The response is organized and addresses most of the major points of the question.
The descriptions and/or explanations of these concepts reflect correct understanding.
The scientific principles related to the function of the safety features are explained.
The interrelationships among science, technology, and society are understood. An
insightful risk is stated.
2
Acceptable
Standard
The response is addresses most of the major points of the question. The descriptions
and/or explanations of these concepts reflect correct understanding. The scientific
principles related to the function of the safety features are identified. The
interrelationships among science, technology, and society are generally understood.
A risk is stated.
The response is addresses most of the major points of the question. The descriptions
and/or explanations of these concepts incorrect understanding. The scientific
principles related to the function of the safety features are incorrectly identified.
The interrelationships among science, technology, and society are poorly understood.
A plausible risk may be stated.
The response does not address any of the major points of the question at an
appropriate level for a 20-level course.