Use of DDGS in

B e e f D i e ts

User Handbook

Use of U.S. Distillers Co-Products in

Beef Cattle Diets
The U.S. beef cattle industry has been a major consumer of wet and dried corn distillers coproducts for decades. As a result, there has been a considerable amount of research conducted to
evaluate the feeding value of corn distillers co-products to cattle. Most of the research that has
been conducted on feeding distillers grains to finishing beef cattle. Several excellent research
summaries and feeding recommendations have been published (Erickson et al., 2005; Tjardes
and Wright, 2002; Loy et al., 2005a; Loy et al., 2005b; Schingoethe, 2004).

Nutrient Composition of Distillers Co-Products for Beef Cattle

There are several different forms of distillers co-products produced in dry grind ethanol
plants. The liquid that is removed from the mash is called thin stillage, which can be returned to
the cooking and distillation processes, sold directly as high moisture cattle feed or dehydrated to
produce condensed distillers solubles (CDS). The residual solids or coarse grains fraction is
referred to as wet distillers grains, and can be used as cattle feed or dried to produce dried
distillers grains (DDG). Condensed distillers solubles can be used as cattle feed or blended with
distillers grains to produce distillers grains with solubles. Distillers grains with solubles are
sold wet (WDGS; 30% dry matter), modified (MDGS; 50% dry matter), or dried (DDGS; 90%
dry matter). Because there are several wet and dry forms of distillers co-products available, it is
important to obtain an actual nutrient analysis of the co-products intended to be used because the
nutrient content can vary widely among. Some of the reasons for variation in nutrient content of
distillers co-products include variation in fermentation and distillation efficiencies, different
drying processes and temperatures and the amount of condensed distillers solubles blended into
various co-products. Commonly reported nutrient values for several distillers co-products are
shown in Table 1 (Tjardes and Wright, 2002).
Table 1: Concentrations of Selected Nutrients in Various Corn Distillers Co-products
(100% Dry Matter Basis).
Nutrient
CDS1
WDG2
MDGS3
DDG4
DDGS5
30-50
25-35
50
88-90
88-90
Dry Matter, %
20-30
30-35
30-35
25-35
25-32
Crude protein, %
50
45-53
45-53
40-50
43-53
Degradable intake protein,
% of CP
9-15
8-12
8-12
8-10
8-10
Fat, %
10-23
30-50
30-50
40-44
39-45
NDF, %
75-120
70-110
70-110
77-88
85-90
TDN, %
2.21-2.54
1.98-2.43
1.98-2.43 1.96-2.21 2.16-2.21
NEm, Mcal/kg
1.76-2.05
1.54-1.76
1.54-1.76 1.48-1.54 1.50-1.54
NEg, Mcal/kg
0.03-0.17
0.02-0.03
0.02-0.03 0.11-0.20 0.17-0.26
Calcium, %
1.30-1.45
0.50-0.80
0.50-0.80 0.41-0.80 0.78-1.08
Phosphorus, %
1
4
Condensed distillers solubles.
Dried distillers grains.
2
5
Wet distillers grains.
Distillers dried grains with solubles.
3
Adapted from Tjardes and Wright (2002).
Modified distillers grains with solubles.

02 - Use of DDGS in Beef Diets

Thin stillage contains only 5-10% dry matter and can be successfully fed to beef cattle as a
water replacement. CDS provide significant amounts of protein and energy to the diet, and is
often used to add moisture to condition diets. However, its use should be limited to no more than
20% of diet dry matter because its high fat content can depress fiber intake and digestion
(Tjardes and Wright, 2002).
Distillers grains with or without solubles is an excellent energy source for cattle. In the United
States, finishing beef cattle have successfully been fed as much as 40% DDGS of ration dry
matter as a replacement for corn grain. When adding DDGS to the diet at this level, it is used
primarily as an energy source, and supplies more protein and phosphorus than required for
finishing feedlot cattle. In one research study (Ham et al., 1994), the net energy gain (NEgain) of
DDGS for beef cattle was 21% higher than the value of dry-rolled corn. Conservatively, most
nutritionists consider DDGS to have an apparent energy value equal to corn grain when fed to
finishing cattle at levels ranging from 10-20% of total ration dry matter. In many studies, feeding
DDGS at levels of 15-20% of the diet dry matter improved growth rate and feed conversion of
finishing beef cattle compared to when diets containing corn grain were fed. This performance
improvement is often a result of reduced sub-acute acidosis and fewer problems with cattle going
off-feed. The starch in corn grain is more likely to cause acidosis, laminitis and fatty liver
when fed at high levels to finishing beef cattle. However, these potential problems are greatly
reduced when feeding DDGS because of the low residual starch content (less than 2%) and the
high amount of highly digestible fiber.
Distillers grains with or without solubles are a very good protein source and are high in
ruminally undegradable protein (RUP), or bypass protein. Since DDGS goes through a drying
process, there is potential for burning which can cause a chemical reaction called the Maillard or
browning reaction. When this reaction occurs, it causes some of the carbohydrate and protein to
be bound in a chemical form that makes it unavailable to the animal. Therefore, light colored
DDGS that has a sweet and fermented smell should be used to achieve the best feeding value and
growth performance for beef cattle. Marketers of DDGS often discount the price of dark and heat
damaged DDGS to account for the reduction in feeding value. Acid detergent insoluble nitrogen
(ADIN) can be used to determine the extent of protein damage in DDGS. Once the ADIN value
is determined in the laboratory, this value is multiplied by a factor of 6.25 to calculate the
appropriate protein value for DDGS. This calculated protein value represents the amount of
crude protein in DDGS that is unavailable and can be compared to the actual crude protein value
to determine the extent of protein damage. The proportion of RUP in DDGS is approximately
60-70% compared to 30% for soybean meal. However, Erickson et al. (2005) indicated that the
high RUP value of DDGS is due to the innate characteristics of the protein rather than drying or
moisture content, and does not appear to be influenced by ADIN since protein efficiency (kg
gain/kg supplemental protein) appears to stay the same or increase as the amount of ADIN in
DDGS increased.
Distillers grains, with or without solubles, are low in calcium but high in phosphorus and
sulfur. Depending upon the feeding level, adding distillers grains to the diet may allow complete
removal of other supplemental phosphorus sources from the mineral mixture previously fed. Due
to the high levels of wet or dried DGS fed, beef cattle feedlot diets contain excess phosphorus
relative to their requirement. This results in excess phosphorus being excreted in manure and
must be considered when developing manure management plans. Due to the low calcium level of
DDGS, supplemental calcium sources (e.g. ground limestone or alfalfa) must be added to the diet
to maintain a calcium to phosphorus ratio between 1.2:1 to no more than 7:1 to avoid reductions
02 - Use of DDGS in Beef Diets

in animal performance and urinary calculi (Tjardes and Wright, 2002). Distillers grains with and
without solubles can sometimes be high in sulfur and contribute significant amounts of sulfur to
the diet. If more than 0.4% sulfur from feed (dry matter basis) and water is consumed,
polioencephalomalacia in cattle can occur. Furthermore, sulfur interferes with copper absorption
and metabolism, which is worsened in the presence of molybdenum. Therefore, in geographic
regions where high sulfur levels are found in forages and water, the level of DDGS that can be
added may need to be reduced (Tjardes and Wright, 2002).

Finishing Cattle
Most of the DDGS research has involved using it primarily as an energy source in diets for
finishing cattle. DDGS is very palatable and readily consumed by beef cattle. Furthermore,
feeding DDGS does not change the quality or yield of beef carcasses, and it has no effect on the
sensory or eating characteristics of beef. Feeding WDGS results in better performance than
feeding DDGS to finishing cattle (Erickson et al., 2005). Replacement of corn with wet distillers
grains has consistently resulted in a 15-25% improvement in feed conversion when 30-40% of
corn is replaced with WDGS in the diet (DeHaan et al., 1982; Farlin, 1981; Firkins et al., 1985;
Fanning et al., 1999; Larson et al., 1993; Trenkle, 1997a; Trenkle 1997b; Vander Pol et al.,
2005a). This improvement in feed conversion is primarily due to WDGS having 120-150% of
the energy value of corn (Erickson et al., 2005). Drying appears to reduce the energy value to
102-127% of the energy value of dry rolled corn in high forage diets. It appears that the high
energy values of WDGS and DDGS are a result of acidosis control (Erickson et al., 2005).
Vander Pol et al. (2005c) showed that when finishing cattle are fed diets containing 10-20%
DDGS of diet dry matter, there is no benefit for supplementing diets with urea, suggesting that
nitrogen recycling was occurring. However, Erickson et al. (2005) suggested that to be
conservative, it may be best to follow National Research Council (1996) guidelines for
degradable intake protein supplementation when formulating diets containing less than 20%
DDGS.
A few studies have evaluated the quality and sensory characteristics of beef from cattle fed
distillers grains. Roeber et al. (2005) evaluated beef color, tenderness and sensory
characteristics of beef strip loins from two experiments where wet or dry distillers grains were
fed to Holstein steers at levels up to 50% of the ration. There were no differences in tenderness,
flavor or juiciness. Similarly, Jenschke et al. (2006) showed that finishing beef cattle fed diets
containing up to 50% wet distillers grains (dry matter basis) produced steaks that did not differ
in tenderness, amount of connective tissue, juiciness or off-flavor intensity. In fact steaks from
cattle fed 0-10% wet distillers grains diets were most likely to have an off-flavor compared to
steaks from cattle fed 30-50% wet distillers diets. Finally, Gordon et al. (2002) fed diets
containing 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, or 75% DDGS to finishing heifers during a 153 day finishing trial
and observed that there was a small linear improvement in tenderness of steaks from cattle fed
increasing amounts of DDGS.
Less research has been conducted related to feeding DDGS to other ages of cattle. However,
DDGS is an excellent feed ingredient to supplement energy and protein when cattle are fed low
quality forages. When added to diets containing forages low in phosphorus, the phosphorus in
DDGS will be of significant value. Other potential uses of DDGS include using it as a creep feed

02 - Use of DDGS in Beef Diets

for nursing calves, a supplement for grazing cattle and a supplement for low quality forages and
crop residues that might be fed to growing calves, gestating beef cows or developing beef
heifers.

Beef Cows
Unlike for finishing beef cattle, less research has been conducted on feeding DDGS to beef
cows. Loy et al. (2005) published an excellent summary of results on DDGS in beef cow diets.
The best applications for DDGS in beef cow diets are in situations where 1) supplemental protein
is needed (especially when feeding low quality forages) to replace corn gluten feed or soybean
meal, 2) a low starch, high fiber energy source is needed to replace corn gluten feed or soy hulls
and 3) when a source of supplemental fat is needed.
DDGS as a Supplemental Protein Source
Researchers have shown that when DDGS was supplemented to provide 0.18 kg of protein/day
to beef cows grazing on a native winter range in Colorado, it compared favorably to alfalfa hay
or cull navy beans (Smith et al., 1999). Shike et al. (2004) compared performance effects of
feeding corn gluten feed or DDGS as a supplement to ground alfalfa hay to lactating Simmental
cows and observed that cows fed DDGS gained more weight, but produced less milk compared
to cows fed corn gluten feed. However, there were no differences between cows fed DDGS and
those fed corn gluten feed on calf weights and rebreeding performance. Loy et al. (2005)
reported that in a subsequent study conducted at the University of Illinois, researchers compared
supplementing diets for lactating Angus and Simmental cows consisting of ground corn stalks
with either DDGS or corn gluten feed. Cows nursing calves were limit-fed total mixed rations
and there were no differences in milk production and calf weight gains between cows
supplemented with DDGS or corn gluten feed.
DDGS as an Energy Source
DDGS is an effective energy supplement when fed with low quality forages. Summer and
Trenkle (1998) showed that DDGS and corn gluten feed were superior supplements to corn in
corn stover diets, but not in the higher quality alfalfa diets. Corn stover (stalks) are low in
protein, energy and minerals, but are low in cost and readily available in major corn producing
states in the United States. When low quality forages (e.g. corn stover) are fed to gestating beef
cows in good condition, feeding 1.4 to 2.3 kg of DDGS per day, during the last 1/3 of gestation
will meet their protein and energy requirements (Loy et al., 2002). For beef cows fed low quality
forage (e.g. corn stalks) in early lactation, supplementing with 2.7 to 3.6 kg of DDGS will meet
their protein and energy requirements (Loy et al., 2002).
DDGS as a Supplemental Fat Source
Supplemental fat may improve reproduction in cow herds experiencing suboptimal pregnancy
rates (less than 90%). Loy et al. (2002) indicated that feeding supplements with similar fatty acid
profiles to corn oil (found in DDGS), improved pregnancy rates. They also showed that fat
supplementation works best in feeding situations where protein and/or energy supplementation is
already necessary.

02 - Use of DDGS in Beef Diets

Replacement Heifers
Very little research has been conducted on feeding DDGS to replacement heifers. However,
based upon numerous studies for finishing cattle, DDGS would be an excellent source of RUP
and energy for developing replacement heifers. In a study by MacDonald and Klopfenstein
(2004), replacement heifers grazing brome grass were supplemented with 0, 0.45, 0.90, 1.36, or
1.81 kg DDGS per day. These researchers observed that for each 0.45 kg of DDGS
supplemented, forage consumption decreased by 0.78 kg per day and average daily gain
increased by 27 g per day.
Loy et al. (2003) evaluated the value of supplementing the ration, daily or three times per
week, with DDGS in high forage diets for growing crossbred heifers. These heifers were
provided ad libitum access to grass hay (8.7% crude protein) and were supplemented with DDGS
or dry rolled corn. The supplements were fed at two levels and offered either daily or three times
per week in equal proportions. For heifers that were supplemented daily, they ate more hay and
gained faster, but were not more efficient than heifers supplemented three times per week. At
both the low and high supplementation levels, heifers fed DDGS had better average daily gain
ADG and feed conversion than heifers fed the dry rolled corn (Table 2). These authors calculated
that the net energy value of DDGS was 27% higher than for corn grain.
Table 2: Growth performance of growing heifers fed native grass hay and supplemented
with either corn or DDGS for at two supplementation levels.
Lowa
Highb
0.37
0.71
ADG, kg/d
Corn
0.45
0.86
DDGS
15.9
9.8
DM Intake/ADG
Corn
12.8
8.0
DDGS
a
Low = supplement fed at 0.21% of body weight
b
High = supplement fed at 0.81% of body weight
Source: Loy et al. (2003a).
In a subsequent study, Loy et al. (2004) fed cannulated heifers either no supplement, DDGS
supplemented daily, DDGS supplemented alternating days, dry rolled corn daily, or dry rolled
corn on alternating days. As expected, hay intake was higher for heifers that received no
supplementation compared to those that did, but there were no differences in feed intake between
heifers supplemented with DDGS or corn. Heifers that were supplemented with DDGS had
higher rates of rumen fiber disappearance than heifers supplemented with corn.
Stalker et al. (2004) conducted two experiments to evaluate the effects of supplemental
degradable protein requirements when DDGS was fed as an energy source in forage based diets.
Diets were formulated to be deficient (less than 100 g/day) in degradable protein but contained
excess metabolizable protein. Their results showed that adding urea to meet the degradable
protein intake requirement is not necessary when DDGS is used as an energy source in forage
based diets.
Morris et al. (2005) showed that when individually fed heifers were provided high or low
quality forage diets that supplementation with either 0, 0.68, 1.36, 2.04, or 2.72 kg DDGS per
day that forage intake decreased and average daily gain increased. These results suggest that
DDGS can be an effective forage supplement to increase growth at times when availability of
forage may be limited.
02 - Use of DDGS in Beef Diets

Summary
Corn DDGS is an excellent energy and protein source for beef cattle in all phases of
production. It can effectively be used as an energy source and be fed up to 40% of ration dry
matter intake for finishing cattle with excellent growth performance and carcass and meat
quality. However, at this high feeding rate excess protein and phosphorus will be fed.
The best applications for using DDGS in beef cow diets are in situations where 1)
supplemental protein is needed (especially when feeding low quality forages) to replace corn
gluten feed or soybean meal, 2) a low starch, high fiber energy source is needed to replace corn
gluten feed or soy hulls and 3) when a source of supplemental fat is needed.
For growing heifers, adding urea to meet the degradable protein intake requirement is not
necessary when DDGS is used as an energy source in forage based diets. DDGS can be an
effective forage supplement to increase growth at times when availability of forage may be
limited.

Literature Cited
Bremer, V.B., G.E. Erickson, T.J. Klopfenstein, M.L. Gibson, K.J. Vander Pol, M.A. Greenquist. 2005. Feedlot
performance of a new distillers byproduct (Dakota Bran) for finishing cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 83:(Suppl. 1).
Cooper, R.J., C.T. Milton, T.J. Klopfenstein, T.L. Scott, C.B. Wilson, and R.A. Mass. 2002. Effect of corn
processing on starch digestion and bacterial crude protein flow in finishing cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 80:797-804.
DeHaan, K., T. Klopfenstein, R. Stock, S. Abrams, and R. Britton. 1982. Wet distillers co-products for growing
ruminants. Nebraska Beef Rep. MP 43:33.
Erickson, G.E., T.J. Klopfenstein, D.C. Adams, and R.J. Rasby. 2006. Utilization of Corn Co-Products in the Beef
Industry. Nebraska Corn Board and the University of Nebraska. www.nebraskacorn.org. 17 pp.
Fanning, K., T. Milton, T. Klopfenstein, and M. Klemesrud. 1999. Corn and sorghum distillers grains for
finishing cattle. Nebraska Beef Rep. MP 71 A:32.
Farlin, S.D. 1981. Wet distillers grains for finishing cattle. Anim. Nutr. Health 36:35.
Firkins, J.L., L.L. Berger, and G.C. Fahey, Jr. 1985. Evaluation of wet and dry distillers grains and wet and dry
corn gluten feeds for ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 60:847.
Gordon, C.M., J.S. Drouillard, R.K Phebus, K.A. Hachmeister, M.E. Dikeman, J.J. Higgins, and A.L. Reicks.
2002. The effect of Dakota Gold Brand dried distillers grains with solubles of varying levels on sensory and color
characteristics of ribeye steaks. Cattlemans Day 2002, Report of Progress 890. Kansas State University. pp. 72-74.
Gustad, K., T.J. Klopfenstein, G. Erickson, J. MacDonald, K. Vander Pol, and M. Greenquist. 2006. Dried
distillers grains supplementation to calves grazing corn residue.
Ham, G.A., R.A. Stock, T.J. Klopfenstein, E.M. Larson, D.H. Shain, and R.P. Huffman. 1994. Wet corn distillers
co-products compared with dried distillers grains with solubles as a source of protein and energy for ruminants. J.
Anim. Sci. 72:3246.
Holt, S.M., and R.H. Pritchard. 2004. Composition and nutritive value of corn co-products from dry milling
ethanol plants. South Dakota State Beef Report.
Jenschke, B.E., J.M. James, K.J. Vander Pol, C.R. Calkins, and T.J. Klopfenstein. 2006. Wet distillers grains plus
solubles do not increase liver-like off-flavors in cooked beef. Nebraska Beef Report, University of NebraskaLincoln, pp. 115-117.
Larson, E.M., R.A. Stock, T.J. Klopfenstein, M.H. Sindt, and R.P. Huffman. 1993. Feeding value of wet distillers
co-products from finishing ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2228.
Loy, T.W., T.J. Klopfenstein, G.E. Erickson, and C.N. Macken. 2003. Value of dry distillers grains in high fiber
diets and effect on supplementation frequency. Nebraska Beef Cattle Report MP 80-A:8.

02 - Use of DDGS in Beef Diets

Loy, T.W., J.C. MacDonald, T.J. Klopfenstein, and G.E. Erickson. 2004. Effect of distillers grains or corn
supplementation frequency on forage intake and digestibility. Nebraska Beef Cattle Report MP 80-A:22-24.
Loza, P.L., K.J. Vander Pol, G.E. Erickson, R.A. Stock, and T.J. Klopfenstein. 2004. Corn milling co-products
and alfalfa levels in cattle finishing diets. J. Anim. Sci. 82 (Suppl. 1):158.
MacDonald, J.C. and T.J. Klopfenstein. 2004. Dried distillers grains as a grazed forage supplement. Nebraska
Beef Cattle Report MP 80-A:22-24.
Morris, S.E., T.J. Klopfenstein, D.C. Adams, G.E. Erickson, and K.J. Vander Pol. 2005. The effects of dried
distillers grains on heifers consuming low or high quality forages. Nebraska Beef Report MP 83-A:18-20.
NRC. 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (7th ed.). National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Owens, F.N., D.S. Secrist, W.J. Hill, and D.R. Gill. 1997. The effect of grain source and grain processing on
performance of feedlot cattle: a review. J. Anim. Sci. 75:868-879.
Roeber, D.L., R.K. Gill, and A DiCostanzo. 2005. Meat quality responses to feeding distillers grains to finishing
Holstein steers. J. Anim. Sci. 83:2455-2460.
Shike, D.W., D.B. Faulkner, and J.M. Dahlquist. 2004. Influence of limit-fed dry corn gluten feed and distillers
dried grains with solubles on performance, lactation, and reproduction of beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 82 (Suppl. 2):96.
Smith, C.D., J.C. Whitlier, D.N. Schutz, and D. Conch. 1999. Comparison of alfalfa hay and distillers dried
grains with solubles alone and in combination with cull beans as protein sources for beef cows grazing native winter
range. Beef Program Report. Colorado St. Clin.
Stalker, L.A., T.J. Klopfenstein, D.C. Adams, and G.E. Erickson. 2004. Urea inclusion in forage-based diets
containing dried distillers grains. Nebraska Beef Cattle Report MP 80-A:20-21.
Stalker, L.A., D.C. Adams, and T.J. Klopfenstein. 2006. A system for wintering beef heifers using dried distillers
grain. Nebraska Beef Report MP 88-A:13.
Stock, R.A., J. M. Lewis, T.J. Klopfenstein, and C.T. Milton. 1999. Review of new information on the use of wet
and dry milling feed by-products in feedlot diets. Proc. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. Available at:
http://www.asas.org/jas/symposia/proceedings/0924.pdf.
Summer, P., ans A. Trenkle. 1998. Effects of supplementing high or low quality forages with corn or corn
processing co-products upon digestibility of dry matter and energy by steers. Iowa State University Beef Research
Report ASL-R1540.
Tjardes, J. and C. Wright. 2002. Feeding corn distiller's co-products to beef cattle. SDSU Extension Extra. Ex
2036, August 2002. Dept. of Animal and Range Sciences. pp. 1-5.
Trenkle, A. 1997a. Evaluation of wet distillers grains in finishing diets for yearling steers. Beef research Report
Iowa State University ASRI 450.
Trenkle, A. 1997b. Substituting wet distillers grains or condensed solubles for corn grain in finishing diets for
yearling heifers. Beef Research report Iowa State University ASRI 451.
Vander pol, K.J., G. Erickson, T. Klopfenstein, and M. Greenquist. 2005a. Effect of level of wet distillers grains
on feed lot performance of finishing cattle and energy value relative to corn. J. Anim. Sci. 83(Suppl. 2):25.
Vander Pol, K.J., G.E. Erickson, and T. Klopfenstin. 2005b. Economics of wet distillers grains use in feedlot
diets. J. Anim. Sci. 83(Suppl. 2):67.
Vander Pol, K.J., G.E. Erickson, and T.J. Klopfenstein. 2005c. Degradable intake protein in finishing diets
containing dried distillers grains. J. Anim. Sci. 83(Suppl. 2):62.
Vander Pol, K.J., G.E. Erickson, M.A. Greenquist, and T.J. Klopfenstein. 2006. Effect of Corn Processing in
Finishing Diets Containing Wet Distillers Grains on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing
Steers. 2006 Nebraska Beef Report.
The U.S. Grains Council (USGC) provides these feeding recommendations to assist potential buyers in understanding
generally-accepted feeding levels. However, all rations for specific herds should be formulated by a qualified nutritionist.
The USGC has no control over the nutritional content of any specific product which may be selected for feeding. Potential
buyers should consult an appropriate nutritionist for specific recommendations. USGC makes no warranties that these
recommendations are suitable for any particular herd or for any particular animal. The USGC disclaims any liability for
itself or its members for any problems encountered in the use of these recommendations. By reviewing this material,
buyers agree to these limitations and waive any claims against USGC for liability arising out of this material.

02 - Use of DDGS in Beef Diets