Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
b. Vocab
i. learned better by oral drill than video
c. Grammar
i. Advanced groups on video curriculum did better than advanced groups on
traditional
ii. Beginner groups on traditional curriculum did better than beginner groups on
video
iii. Hypotheses:
1. Maybe higher linguistic competence of advanced students allowed them
to use contextualized dramatic situations to learn specific structures in a
way not open to less advanced students
2. Maybe advanced students take comprehension gaps as opportunities to
learn the grammar, while beginner students more often just give up
d. Importance of the teacher
i. Video-based curriculum does NOT free teacher from all class prep
ii. Teacher played vital role in:
1. Preparing students for tapes
2. Reviewing material before and after presentation
3. Engage students in additional active and interactive exercises for oral
practice
iii. The videotapes provide students with important experiences while not
detracting from other skills, allowing teachers more time to plan other
activities
e. Overall conclusion:
i. A systematic foreign language curriculum INCLUDING student viewing of
videotapes of natural interaction among native speakers is an important and
useful activity to promote listening comprehension
CORE III applications
a. Video material does not work as a substitute in our case haha
i. 30 minutes
ii. WE have to be the teachers of material
iii. Vocab-based class => oral drills better
b. Give students same practice as those in the test did from watching video