Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
B. Smith (Uniper)
B
(Uniper), P.
P McCann (Uniper)
(Uniper),
W. Hater (Kurita), A. de Bache (Kurita)
Content
Connahs Quay power plant
Water/steam cycle chemistry analysis
Results of plant inspections
Conclusions
U i
Uniper
P
Power
Pl t Connahs
Plant,
C
h Quay,
Q
UK
U i
Uniper
P
Power
Pl t Connahs
Plant,
C
h Quay,
Q
UK
Type of boilers:
Steam pressure:
Steam temperature:
Condensate return:
> 95 %
Condensing
Condensate polishing:
None
Make-up water:
Deaerator:
Condenser:
C
Materials:
C
Connahs
h Quay
Q
W t /St
Water/Steam
C l
Cycle
CO: Condensate
DA: Deaerator
EC: Economiser
PH: Preheater
EV: Evaporator
SH: Superheater
RH: Reheater
LP: Low pressure
IP: Intermediate
pressure
HP: High pressure
O
Operating
ti Challenges
Ch ll
for
f Preservation
P
ti
Recent mode of operation:
Station operating regime varies considerably, between 1 and 4 units running
with daily start-ups and shutdowns
Maximum stand-by period ca. 4 weeks
Units must remain available with short start-up times
Preservation challenges
possible to p
protect all p
plant areas due to p
plant design,
g , e.g.
g Reheater
Not p
cannot be isolated
Established preservation methods are difficult to implement without
compromising start
start-up
up times
Steam turbines not routinely preserved unless more than 2 weeks stand-by
(need to connect dehumidifiers)
W t /St
Water/Steam
C l Treatment
Cycle
T t
t
until
til 2013:
2013
Ammonia
A
i
NaOH
12.2013
Unit 4
Cetamine V219 (FFA + Cyclohexylamine)
Ammonia
NaOH
same as before
08.2015
08 2015
03.2016
03 2016
(feedwater:
(f
d t
pH:
H 9
9.4
4 9.6)
9 6)
(boilers:
pH: HP 9.2 9.4; IP, LP 9.5 9.8)
Unit
U
it 1
Cetamine G850 (FFA)
Ammonia
NaOH
same as before
Feedwater
Feedwater
Feedwater
Feedwater
C t i Trials
Cetamine
Ti l
FFA
Adjustment of product dose to achieve 0.1 g/m FFA
Analysis
y byy Bengalrose
g
method
FFA could be detected latest 2 hours after unit start-up
Unit 4
Cetamine V219 (FFA + Cyclohexylamine)
First detected FFA in condensate after 420 hours running; 4 months total time
(ca. 30 start-ups)
Unit 1
Cetamine G850 (FFA only)
First detected FFA in condensate after 380 hours running, total time 3 weeks
((ca. 20 start-ups)
p )
8
Unit
U
it 4 IP R
Reheat
h t St
Steam:
(Degassed) Conductivity After Cation Exchange
U it 1 HP Steam:
Unit
St
C d ti it After
Conductivity
Aft C
Cation
ti E
Exchange
h
10
Comparison
C
i
off Monitoring
M it i Data
D t from
f
U it 4 (V219) and
Unit
d
Unit 1 (G850)
Acetate and formate concentrations in HP, IP and LP Steams
11
Comparison
C
i
off Monitoring
M it i Data
D t from
f
U it 4 (V219) and
Unit
d
Unit 1 (G850)
Contributions to HP/IP Steam Conductivity After Cation Exchange
12
Treatment
T
t
t Results:
R
lt HRSG D
Drums
(Unit 4: 12.2014 12 months V219)
I t
Intermediate
di t Pressure
P
D
Drum
Treatment
T
t
t Results:
R
lt HRSG D
Drums
(Unit 1: 10.2015 3 months G850)
T t
Treatment
t Results:
R
lt HP E
Evaporator
t B
Boiler
il Tubes
T b
Unit 4: (10.2015)
Unit 1 (8.2015)
15
T t
Treatment
t Results:
R
lt Unit
U it 4 HP E
Evaporator
t Tubing
T bi
2012
2015
100 m
50 m
16
T t
Treatment
t Results:
R
lt Reheater
R h t Tubes
T b
U it 4
Unit
Unit 1
17
XPS St
Studies
di off Boiler
B il Tube
T b Samples
S
l
Samples studied:
Unit 4
From
F
2012 ((no FFA)
HP Evaporator
From 2015 (2 years V219)
HP Evaporator
Reheater
Photoelectronspectroscopy (XPS)
Elemental composition of surface (nm)
Depth profiles
Information on chemical structure via
binding energy
Typical XPS spectrum
Unit 1
From 2015 (3 months G 850)
HP Evaporator
p
Reheater
18
R
Results
lt off XPS St
Studies
di
Main components
Carbon (mainly aliphatic)
Oxygen
Steel material (Fe, Cr, Ni)
Traces of F (cutting)
Nitrogen (mainly organic amine)
N as organic amine detected on all
s rfaces exposed
surfaces
e posed to FFA
No N detected on untreated surfaces
Tube sample
N-content
[At %]
Unit 4
HP E
Evaporator
t
2012 (no FFA)
2015
0
0.9 2.3
Reheater 2015
1.2
Unit 1 ((2015))
HP Evaporator
0.4 0.7
Reheater
1.8
19
T t
Treatment
t Results:
R
lt LP Steam
St
T bi
Turbines,
St
Stage
5 (fi
(finall stage)
t
)
Unit 4
Unit 1
20
T t
Treatment
t Results:
R
lt LP Steam
St
T bi
Turbine,
Unit
U it 1,
1 Stages
St
1-5
15
Top:
front face
Bottom: rear/trailing face
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
Stage 5
K it Surface
Kurita
S f
T t Results:
Test
R
lt LP Steam
St
T bi
Turbine,
Units
U it 1 & 4
Kurita Test:
Qualitative test of FFA presence
- Removal of FFA from surface
- Determination of FFA byy
Bengalrose method
- Pink colour => positive proof
- Absorbance
Positive readings on LP turbines
- Unit 4, Stage 5
- Unit 1
1, Stages 1
1-5
5
Sample
Absorbance
Blank
Untreated blade
Unit 4, Stage 5
- front side
- trailing edge
- disk and roots
Unit 1,
- Stage 5
- trailing surface
- inner front
- Stage 3
- front face
- Stage 1
- trailing face
0.16
0.21
0.30
0 26
0.26
0.33
1.21
0.38
0 34
0.34
0.28
22
C
Conclusions
l i
New treatment concept with film forming amines evaluated
FFA could be determined on both water and steam touched surfaces, including
HP Evaporator, Reheater, LP Steam Turbine cylinders
Cleaning effect evident in Unit 4 HP Evaporator - removal of loose iron oxides,
but not magnetite layer
Alkalising amines led to increased CACE caused by organic acids and carbon
dioxide; new Cetamine G850 in accordance with steam quality requirements
Protection of components throughout the water/steam cycle,
cycle including areas
that could not be preserved by nitrogen capping or dehumidified air circulation
Minimal manpower for preservation compared to nitrogen
g capping
g or
dehumification
No impact on unit availability or start-up times
Acknowledgement
24
This document is confidential. Any kind of reproduction, change, transfer to a third party or disclosure of this document,
even extracts, requires the prior written consent of Kurita Europe GmbH.