Experts at The Crime Scene - Impeaching Crooked U.S. Judge Honeywell

Legal Descriptions
From Hell
Honey-from-Hell’s
Record Crimes
GETTING IN THE EXPERTS:
Scott Gardner Hawkins
“legal description” from hell:

6/22/2010 Scott Hawkins
Our Firm Attorneys Practice Groups Firm New s Legal Updates Careers
Scott Gardner Hawkins Practice Groups

Business/Corporate
President-Elect Designate, The S ervices
Florida Bar Eminent Domain
Employment Law
Florida Bar Board Certified Business Litigation Litigation
Municipal Law
Lawyer
Martindale-Hubbell AV Rated Attorney
Education
J.D., Univ. of Florida, 1983
Scott, the firm's Vice-Chair (and Shareholder since B.S.B.A., honors, Univ. of
1990) and a the President-Elect Designate of The Florida, 1980
Florida Bar (2010 - 2011), practices commercial M .B.A., Univ. of
litigation with an emphasis on intellectual property, Edinburgh,
trade secret disputes, covenants not to compete Scotland, 1985
and real estate litigation. He also has significant
shawkins@jones-foster.com civil and administrative litigation experience in areas Bar Admissions
involving environmental and land use disputes and The Florida Bar
disputes involving claims arising under ERISA American Bar Association
direct dial: (561) 650-0460
Plans. His clients include technology companies Palm Beach County Bar
direct fax: (561) 650-0436
(internet technology, software development, Association
pharmaceutical product development), major
505 S outh Flagler Drive property land owners and insurance companies.
S uite 1100 Court Admissions
Scott will take the seat of President of The Florida
West Palm Beach, FL U.S. Supreme Court
Bar in 2011.
33401 All Florida State Courts
U.S. Court of Appeals for
A former President of the Palm Beach County Bar the 11th Circuit
Association, Scott was awarded Palm Beach U.S. District Courts for the
Atlantic University’s American Free Enterprise Day Southern,
Companion Medal in 2003. Scott was named "Most M iddle and Northern
Productive Young Lawyer" by The Florida Bar's Districts
Young Lawyers Section in 1995. He is listed as a
Corporate Counsel Super Lawyer and a Florida
Super Lawyer by Law & Politics Super Lawyers (extended bio)
Magazine; and is listed in The Best Lawyers in
America. Scott also has been recognized as one of
the Top Lawyers in South Florida by the South
Florida Legal Guide and listed as one of Florida
Trend Magazine's Legal Elite (2004).
©Copyright 2005 Jones Foster Johnston & Stubbs, P.A. All Rights Reserved
jones-foster.com/scott hawkins bio.htm 1/2

Hell Honey
why don’t you answer?
239-461-2179
Plaintiffs in
Honey-from-Hell’s Courtroom
6/22/2010 Jones Foster Johnston & Stubbs
Our Firm Attorneys Practice Groups Firm New s Legal Updates Careers
FIRM NEWS
Dating to 1909, Jones, Foster, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A. is a multi-disciplined, solution-
oriented firm of attorneys which has earned the highest state and national recognitions Allen Tomlinson receives the
and bar certifications. Our experienced legal counsel and attentive staff are sought after Legal Aid Society's Civil
by a growing local and national client base for responsiveness, integrity and creative Litigation Award
thinking. A commitment to state-of-the-art technology and on-going comprehensive
training enhances our ability to communicate effectively and to organize case loads Theo Kypreos is elected to
efficiently. With offices in West Palm Beach and Jupiter, this firm is a participant in a the Palm Beach County Bar
(561) 659-3000
growing and vibrant Palm Beach County and continues to embrace the traditional values Association Board of
and professionalism which have been its hallmark for over 100 years. Directors
West Palm Beach: Congratulations,
505 South Flagler Drive Scott G. Hawkins,
President-Elect Designate,
Suite 1100 The Florida Bar 2010 - 2011
West Palm Beach, FL
33401 ESTATE, GIFT AND GENERATION-
SKIPPING TAX
CLIENT ADVISORY 2010
Jupiter:
801 Maplewood Drive
Suite 22-A
Jupiter, FL 33458 Sidney A. Stubbs named
"Lawyer of the Year" by Best
Mailing Address: Lawyers
Post Office Box 3475
West Palm Beach, FL
33402-3475 ...........
sitemap
©Copyright 2005 Jones Foster Johnston & Stubbs, P.A. All Rights Reserved
http://www.jones-foster.com/index.html 1/1
STEAMROLLER:
I trust in title forgery
Judge Charlene E. Honeywell

48
http://www.scribd.com/Judicial Fraud
http://www.scribd.com/Judicial%20Fraud
6/22/2010 United States Code: Title 42,1985. Co…
Search Law School Search Cornell
LII / Lega l Inform a tion Institute

hom e se arch find a la wyer dona te
U.S. Code
m a in page faq index sea rch
TITLE 42 > C HAPTER 21 > SUBC HAPTER I > § 1985
§ 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights

(1) Preventing officer from performing duties
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or
holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like
means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed,
or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful
discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties;
(2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror

If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of
the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure
such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict,
presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of
any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons
conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or
Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or
attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws;
(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges

If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the
purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal
privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or
Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons
conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a
legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a
Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any
case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of
the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or
privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned
by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.
Ask A Lawyer
Online.
Get an Answer ASAP!
Dona tions cover only

20% of our costs.
…cornell.edu/…/usc_sec_42_0000198… 1/2
Jennifer Franklin Prescott, Judicial Crime Victim
Dr. Jorg Busse, Governmental Crime Victim
http://www.scribd.com/JUDICIAL%20FRAUD
CERTIFIED FACSIMILE TO 239-461-2179

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
CHAMBERS
Charlene Edwards Honeywell, U.S. District Judge
Bettye G. Samuel, Judicial Assistant
Libby Figgers, Courtroom Deputy
RE: PRESCOTT v. HONEYWELL, 2:2010-cv-00390

PRESCOTT v. ALEJO, 2:2009-cv-00791
BUSSE v. STEELE, 2:2010-cv-00089
YOUR PATTERN OF CORRUPTION, CONCEALMENT, & FRAUD ON COURT
Fraudulent Pretenses of “Lee County” “ownership” of fake “land” ”parcels”;

Facially Forged “parcel” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;
Facially Forged “parcel” “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
Criminal Concealment of Record Lack of any Lee County title/ownership;
Fraud by Defendant Lee County Property Appraiser Kenneth M. Wilkinson;
Extension of Def. Wilkinson’s Crimes by Def. Attorney Jack N. Peterson
Bogus “Legal Descriptions” in Honey-from-Hell’s Court (see Florida Bar, Uniform
Title Standards)
Dear Honey from Hell:
1. Your “legal advice” is as “frivolous” as the fake “legal descriptions” in your Court:
2. Your “incomprehensible” “contention” of “frivolity” is further fiction from your Court
of fabrications. The fear of further “frivolous” fabrications and NAZI style terror is
punishing. The Plaintiffs are forwarding the conclusive evidence of the CORRUPTION
in your Court to law enforcement authorities.
3. By presenting to this Court pleadings, written motions, and other papers, the Plaintiffs
certified that to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an
inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, you criminally concealed and conspired to
conceal well-evidenced Government CORRUPTION and fraudulent Government
“claims” of “Government ownership” of non-existent and forged “land” “parcels” “12-
44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”.
4. “Frivolity” and “vexatiousness” were not any “defense” and not warranted under
existing law. You presented “sanctionability” and “frivolity” for unlawful purposes such
as to harass the Plaintiffs, cause unnecessary delay, and needlessly increase the cost of
litigation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11.
5. No competent, honest, and intelligent judge in your shoes could have possibly concocted
that the proof of Government CORRUPTION and fake “land parcels” on the record
was “not meritorious”.
6. No intelligent, fit, and professional judge in your shoes could have possibly perverted
Florida’s Eminent Domain, Adverse Possession, and Record Marketable Title Act the way
you did. Your dishonesty, incompetence, and threats on the record have been
terrorizing and punishing. The Plaintiffs fear for their fundamental rights and are
suing you, PRESCOTT v. HONEYWELL, Case # 2:2010-cv-00390-36-DNF.
7. Defendants’ fraudulent denials of Plaintiffs’ factual contentions were not warranted on
the record evidence and not reasonably based on belief or a lack of information. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b).
8. Your fraudulent perversions of Plaintiffs’ well proven factual contentions were not
warranted on the record evidence and not reasonably based on belief or a lack of
information. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b).
9. Pursuant to the public record evidence, your belief and policy are CORRUPTION and
terror, and the Plaintiffs objected.
10. You concealed the prima facie criminality and nullity of, e.g., forged “land” “parcels”
“12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000” and Government ownership
claims in the record absence of any Government title evidence.
11. The record conclusively proved your intimidating contempt of the law, and in
particular of, e.g., Chapters 712; 73, 74; 95, Florida Statutes; and Florida and Federal
Constitutions.
12. The Plaintiffs defend against your NAZI style Court CORRUPTION and demand
EMERGENCY relief from your well-proven fraud upon the Court and legally
“incomprehensible” bogus contentions of “frivolity”.
2
6/22/2010 Prescott et al v. Alejo et al :: Justia Do…
Justia.com Lawyer Directory Law Blogs Dockets & Filings more ▼ Sign In
Enter Party Name Search Dockets Show Options
Justia > Dockets & Filings > Florida > Florida Middle District Court > Civil Rights > Other Civil Rights > Prescott et al v. Alejo et al
Prescott et al v. Alejo et al Share |

Connect with Justia
Plaintiffs: Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Jorg Busse
Defendants: Roger Alejo, Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Jack N. Peterson, Roger Follow Justia Fan Justia
Desjarlais, Lee County Florida, Lee County Value Adjustment
Board, Lori L. Rutland, State of Florida, Board of Trustees of
the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, State of Florida, Find a Lawyer
Department of Environmental, Chad Lach, Reagan Kathleen
Civil Rights
Russell, Karen B. Hawes, Charlie Green, Bob Janes, Brian
City, State Search
Bigelow, Ray Judah, Tammy Hall, Frank Mann, United States
Attorney(s), Sean P. Flynn, E. Kenneth Stegeby, David P. Browse Lawyers
Rhodes, A. Brian Albritton, Cynthia A. Pivacek, Johnson
Engineering, Inc., Steven Carta, Mike Scott, Hugh D. Hayes, Lawyers - Get Listed Now!
Get a free full directory profile listing
Gerald D. Siebens, State of Florida Attorney General, William M.
Martin, Peterson Bernard, Skip Quillen, Tom Gilbertson and
Charles Barry Stevens
Case Number: 2:2009cv00791

Filed: December 4, 2009
Court: Florida Middle District Court

Office: Fort Myers Office [ Court Info ]
County: XX US, Outside State

Presiding Judge: Judge Charlene E. Honeywell
Presiding Judge: Judge Unassigned Judge

Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights
Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
Date Filed # Document Text
March 25, 2010 98 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 80 The
Defendants, A. Brian Albritton, David P. Rhodes, Sean P.
Flynn, and E. Kenneth Stegebys (USAO Defendants) Motion
to Strike Plaintiffs Notices (Doc. # 74, 75, and 76) and for an
Award of Monetary Sa nctions. The Defendants, A. Brian
Albritton, David P. Rhodes, Sean P. Flynn, and E. Kenneth
Stegebys (USAO Defendants) Motion to Strike Plaintiffs
Notices is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is hereby
directed to STRIKE (Docs. # 74, 75, and 76). (2) The
dockets.justia.com/…/case_id-239266/ 1/10
Defendants, A. Brian Albritton, David P. Rhodes, Sean P.
Flynn, and E. Kenneth Stegebys (USAO Defendants) Motion
for Rule 11 Sanctions is DENIED Signed by Magistrate Judge
Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/25/2010. (LMH)
March 26, 2010 99 ORDER denying 84 the Plaintiffs, Jennifer Franklin Prescott
and Jorge Busses Motion to Compel Defendants Responses
and Declare Defendants' Previous Pleadings not Responsive
to Proven Judicial Case Fixing, Corruption, Fraud in the
Court(s) and Bribery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri
Polster Chappell on 3/26/2010. (LMH)
March 26, 2010 100 ORDER denying 89 the Plaintiffs, Jennifer Franklin Prescott
and Jorge Busse's Motion for Default Judgment in Plaintiffs'
Favor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on
3/26/2010. (LMH)
March 30, 2010 116 ORDER denying 45 The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin Prescott
and Dr. Jorge Busse's Motion for Recusal of Magistrate
Judge; denying 60 The Plaintiffs, Jennifer Franklin Prescott
and Dr. Jorge Busse's Motion for Recusal of Magistrate
Judge; denying 105 The Plaintiffs, Jennifer Franklin Prescott
and Dr. Jorge Busse's Emergency Motion for Recusal of
Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster
Chappell on 3/30/2010. (LMH)
March 31, 2010 117 ORDER denying 101 the Plaintiffs, Jennifer Prescott and
Dr. Jorge Busse's Emergency Motion for Judicial Notice of
Concealment of Evidence ; denying 102 The Plaintiffs,
Jennifer Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busse's Emergency Motion
for Judici al Notice of Concealment of Evidence and Objection
to Order (Doc. # 98) which was Procured by Fraud on the
Court; denying 103 The Plaintiffs, Jennifer Prescott and Dr.
Jorge Busse's Emergency Motion Objections to Order (Doc.
# 98) and Judicial Notice of Concealment of Evidence;
denying 106 The Plaintiffs, Jennifer Prescott and Dr. Jorge
Busse's Emergency Motion to Enjoin the Case Fixing on
Record and Conspiracy of Case Fixing and for Judge to
Recuse; denying 107 The Plaintiffs, J ennifer Franklin Prescott
and Dr. Jorge Busse's Emergency Motion for Miscellaneous
Relief to Clear Judicial Error; denying 108 The Plaintiffs,
Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busse's Emergency
Motion of the Dispositive Declaratio n of Plaintiffs' Record
Ownership by U.S. Court of Appeals ; denying 109 The
Plaintiffs, Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busse's
Emergency Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Specifically Timely
Objections to Clear Judicial Error ; d enying 110 The
Emergency Motion for Miscellaneous Relief ; denying 111 The
Emergency Motion for Injunction of Crim inal Concealment
and Striking of Document 76 by Judge Chappell ; denying
112 The Plaintiffs, Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr. Jorge
Busse's Motion for Judicial Notice of Defendants' Fraud on
the Court and Fraudulent Pleadings. Signed by Magistrate
Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/31/2010. (LMH)
April 1, 2010 127 ORDER denying 31 The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin Prescott
and Dr. Jorge Busse's Motion for Waiver of Any and All Fees
; denying 47 The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr.
Jorge Busses Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Specifically to
Set Aside Fraudulent Order (Doc. 36); denying 48 The
Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busse's
Motion for Recusal of Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster
Chappell; denying 49 The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin Prescott
and Dr. Jorge Busses Motion to Set Aside Order (Doc. # 38)
and to Adjudicate New Issues; denying 50 Motion to Set
Aside Judgment; denying 50 The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin
Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busse's Motion to Set Aside Order
(Doc. # 38) and Ma ndatory Recusal of Magistrate Judge
Chappell ; denying 51 Motion to Set Aside Judgment;
denying 51 The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr.
Jorge Busses Motion to Set Aside Order (Doc. # 37) and
Mandatory Recusal of Magistrate Judge Chap pell ; denying
67 The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr. Jorge
Busse's Motion for Release of Lien; denying 72 The Plaintiffs
Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busses Motion to
Enjoin Judge Shopping and Enforce Courts Own Or der for
Removal of Corrupt R.A. Lazzara ; denying 73 The Plaintiffs
Motion to Enjoin Defendants' Title Fraud & Fraud on the
Court, and Any Government/ Judicial Sale (; denying [82 ]
The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busse's
Motion to Specifically Enjoin Governmental Fraudulent
Concealment of Uncontroverted Eminent Domain Record
Forgeries and Obstruction of Justice and Court Access ;
denying 83 The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr.
Jorge Busse's Motion for Reconsideration and Declaratory
Statement(s) of the Emergency of Judicial Case Fixing, Fraud
on the Court(s) ; denying 85 The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin
Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busse's Emergency Motion for
Immediate Screening of the Prima Facie Illegality and Nullity
of Lee County Scam O.R. 569/875 ; denying 86 The Plaintiffs
Motion to Enjoin Gover nmental Extortion & Threats by
Defendant U.S. Agents, Judges, and Counsel (Doc. # 80)
and for Removal from all Proceedings of Magistrate Judge S.
Polster Chappell ; denying 90 The Plaintiffs Jennifer Franklin
Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busse's Emergency Motion for
Immediate Removal of Court Officer Corinins and Objection
to Perpetration of Fraud on Court. Signed by Magistrate
Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/1/2010. (LMH)
June 11, 2010 189 ORDER denying 144 the Plaintiffs, Jennifer Franklin
Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busse's Motion for Recusal. Signed
by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/11/2010.
(LMH)
June 11, 2010 190 ORDER denying 182 the Plaintiffs, Jennifer Franklin
Prescott and Dr. Jorge Busse's Motion to Reconsider Order
Denying the Plaintiff's Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve
Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
49
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MYERS DIVISION
JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, DR. JORG BUSSE,

Plaintiffs,
versus Case # 2:10-cv-
CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL;

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; JENNIFER WAUGH CORINIS; A. BRIAN ALBRITTON,
Defendants.
INDEPENDENT ACTION
FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT FRAUD,
CORRUPTION, AND WRIT OF EXECUTION
____________________________________________________________________________/
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
JURISDICTION:
RECORD CORRUPTION & CONTEMPT OF THE LAW BY U.S. AGENTS
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the CORRUPT and illegal acts by Defendant U.S. Agents,
who injured and harassed the Plaintiffs under facially false and fraudulent pretenses of, e.g.,
“frivolity”, “sanctionability”, “vexatiousness”, and “lack of jurisdiction”. In particular, this
Court has jurisdiction over Governmental bribery, CORRUPTION, Governmental forgery of
fake “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, and
Defendant U.S. Officials’ conspiracy to fix Plaintiffs’ Cases under said false pretenses.
2. This Court had jurisdiction over deliberate deprivations, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 42
U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1988, and Defendants’ direct violations of the 1st, 14th, 4th, 7th, and 5th
U.S. Const. Amendments. Here on the public record, the Defendants and Government
Officials deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of due process and equal protection of Federal
and Florida law, any opportunity of justice and the just, speedy, and inexpensive adjudication
of Plaintiffs’ legal claims and issues of, e.g., CORRUPTION and relief from previous fraud
on the Courts, fraud, and facially forged “Government ownership” claims, and criminal
seizure and forced sale of Plaintiffs’ real property. See prima facie fraudulent “writ of
execution”, 2:2007-cv-00228-JES-SPC, which was procured through fraud, fraud on the
Court, and fraudulent pretenses of “frivolity”, and “sanctionability”, and by criminal means
of perverting and abusing Fed.R.Civ.P. 11.
3. The Defendants, Government Officials, and Defendant crooked U.S. Judge Honeywell
(“Honeywell”) evidenced a vexatious and vile disrespect for the law and facts in these mock
proceedings. In particular, said Government Agents deliberately disrespected, e.g.:
a. 1st U.S. Constitutional Amendment;

b. 14th U.S. Constitutional Amendment;
c. 4th U.S. Constitutional Amendment;
d. 5th U.S. Constitutional Amendment;
e. 7th U.S. Constitutional Amendment;
f. Florida’s Marketable Record Title Act, Chapter 712, Fla. Stat.;
g. Florida’s Eminent Domain Statutes; Chapters 73 & 74, Fla. Stat.;
h. Florida’s Adverse Possession Statutes; Ch. 95, Fla. Stat.;
i. Florida’s Involuntary Alienation law;
j. Florida’s Constitution: right to own land & property and exclude Government; right
to redress Governmental grievances; right to be free from Government
CORRUPTION; oppression, deliberate deprivations; and terror; right to eminent
domain, condemnation, and involuntary alienation due process; right to a jury trial;
k. 28 U.S.C. § 455;
l. 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242;
m. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1988.
ADOPTION OF RELATED/ASSOCIATED PLEADINGS BY REFERENCE
4. Hereby, the Plaintiff Government and judicial CORRUPTION victims adopt by reference in
this Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial their Notices of Appeal, Objections, and other
Pleadings in the related and associated Cases shown in the table below. In particular, the
Plaintiffs adopt Plaintiffs’ Notices of Appeal from Defendant Honeywell’s fraudulent
2
“orders”, Plaintiffs’ Objections to said facially non-meritorious “orders” in Cases 2:2009-cv-
00791, and 2:2010-00089.
HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION, FRAUD, FRAUD ON THE COURTS
Court Case No. Filed NOS Closed

Name
1 BUSSE, JORG flmdce 2:2009cv00041 01/23/2009 890 02/11/2009
2 BUSSE, JORG flmdce 2:2010cv00089 02/09/2010 440
7 BUSSE, JORG flmdce 2:2009cv00791 12/04/2009 440
CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION
5. In Case after Case, Judge after Judge, Official after Official repeated the objectively idiotic
criminal assertions of, e.g., “vexatiousness”, “frivolity”, “lack of jurisdiction” even though
the prima facie criminality of concealing fictitious and facially forged “land” “parcels” “12-
44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000” had been patently clear and
conclusively proven.
6. Government Officials frivolously and criminally asserted “Government ownership” even
though all Defendant Judges and Government Officials knew that fake “land” “parcels” “12-
44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000” had never existed and could not be
legally described in reference to the publicly recorded 1912 “Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat,
PB 3, PG 25.
3
GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION ON THE PUBLIC RECORD
7. Government Agents, Judges, and Defendants then fraudulently “attached a lien” against the
very property, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, Governments had previously claimed to be
“Government owned”. Said fraudulent “lien” conclusively evidenced the criminality of bogus
“land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, which had
never been platted or legally described and could not be linked to any title transaction and/or
transfer or creation of any property interest in the name of “Lee County”.
PERVERSIONS OF TITLE STANDARDS AND EVIDENCE
8. The Government CORRUPTION was fully evidenced on the public record. According to the
Government custom, policy and pattern of CORRUPTION and fraudulent “Government
ownership” “claims”, Government Agents recklessly perverted Federal and Florida real
property title standards. See, e.g., Florida Bar Uniform Title Standards; Lee County PB
3, PG 25 (1912); see also 24 C.F.R. § 203; and 24 C.F.R. § 203.385 Types of satisfactory
title evidence; Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1; PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App.
LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; www.LeeClerk.org.
RECORD JUDICIAL DENIGRATION OF THE PLAINTIFFS AS “VEXATIOUS”:
STEAMROLLING, “SHUTTING UP” & “CROTCH KICKING” THE PLAINTIFFS
9. In the record absence of any valid “final judicial determination”, and while appeals and
independent actions for relief from fraud and fraud upon the Courts were pending, and under
fraudulent pretenses of “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”, corrupt Judge Honeywell deliberately
disrupted and delayed the sham proceedings and obstructed any chance of justice and a fair
trial. In addition to her vile and vexatious disrespect for the law, Honeywell disrespected the
4
record facts and capriciously denigrated the pro se Plaintiffs as “vexatious” without ever
addressing the legal claims, issues, and merits in the fake judicial proceedings.
10. The record judicial and Governmental CORRUPTION spill, and in particular, the
“vexatiousness”, “frivolity”, and “O.R. 569/875” extortion-coercion-fraud-schemes tarnished
the U.S. District Court and Defendant CORRUPT Official Honeywell just like the oil spill in
the Gulf of Mexico tarnished BP and the U.S. Government. However, Honeywell refused to
recuse Defendant Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and herself. For the criminal purposes of
obstructing justice, Honeywell entirely “dodged” the pleaded legal claims and issues by
fraudulently pretending “vexatiousness” and “frivolity” instead of demanding Defendants’
defenses and answers according to the Rules of Civil Procedure.
PLAINTIFFS DEFEND AGAINST RECORD JUDICIAL CORRUPTION
11. Here, the Plaintiffs shall not comply with said record Governmental corruption, fraud,
extortion, and coercion schemes and NULL & VOID orders and judgments that were
procured through prima facie fraud and corruption. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009
U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; “O.R. 569/875”; Lee County PB 3, PG 25
(1912).
DEMAND FOR CHANGE OF OBJECTIVELY CORRUPT VENUE
12. Here any idiot could have scribbled the incomprehensible and legally unrecognized “claim”
“O.R. 569/875”, and any idiot could have blurted out “vexatiousness”, because no intelligent
and fit judge in Honeywell’s shoes could have possibly determined “vexatiousness” and/or
“frivolity” merely because the Plaintiffs relied on the public records and said 11th Circuit
Affirmation of ownership. Id. Here, Honeywell was ESTOPPED from fraudulently
5
pretending “vexatiousness”, because the Plaintiffs merely asserted the record truth and
defended against Honeywell’s vile and vexatious trickery and deception on file.
13. Here after years of CORRUPTION and concealment in the Fort Myers District Court,
Honeywell continued the record policy, custom, and tradition of CORRUPTION,
concealment of record facts, and Governmental and judicial contempt of law. Therefore, the
Plaintiffs demand immediate change of venue.
DEFENDANT CROOKED U.S. JUDGE CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL
14. The Plaintiffs are suing Defendant CROOKED Government Official Honeywell in her
private individual and official capacity as U.S. District Judge, Agent, and Official.
INTIMIDATION & DENIAL OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1983
15. Defendant Honeywell denied and conspired with other Government Officials to deny to
Plaintiffs the equal protection of the laws, and to injure them and their property for lawfully
enforcing, and attempting to enforce, their rights to the equal protection of the laws.
GOVERNMENT AGENTS’ CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE & INTIMIDATE
16. In court(s) of the United States, Honeywell deterred and conspired to deter, by force,
intimidation, threats, “orders” (e.g., 2:2009-cv-00791; Doc. 186, 126), and a hearing
scheduled for June 22, 2010, the Plaintiffs and witnesses from attending such court, and from
testifying to the legal matters of, e.g., Government CORRUPTION and Government “land
robbery” pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, and to injure the Plaintiffs and other
“Cayo Costa” Subdivision landowners, PB 3, PG 25 (1925), and witnesses.
17. Under false pretenses of, e.g., “frivolity” and “vexatiousness”, Honeywell obstructed justice
and conspired with other Government Officials for the purposes of impeding, hindering,
obstructing, or defeating, in various manners, the due course of justice. In particular,
6
Honeywell conspired to hinder Plaintiffs’ rights to own their property and exclude
Governments, and Lee County, which fraudulently asserted “Government ownership” of said
fake “land” “parcels”. Honeywell “scheduled a hearing” on June 22, 2010, for purposes of
fixing Plaintiffs’ Case(s).
DEPRIVATIONS OF RIGHTS & PRIVILEGES TO REDRESS GRIEVANCES
18. Honeywell scheduled a hearing, just like Defendant Chappell had done on Nov. 7.2007, for
the purposes of depriving, directly and indirectly, the Plaintiffs of the equal protection of the
laws, and of the equal privileges and immunities under the laws; and for the purposes of
preventing and hindering U.S. authorities from securing to Plaintiffs and “Cayo Costa”
Subdivision landowners the equal protection of the laws.
19. Honeywell conspired with other Defendants, U.S. Attorneys, and Lee County Defendants to
schedule said hearing to prevent by force, intimidation, “orders”, and/or threats of record,
said Plaintiffs, who were lawfully entitled to prosecute, from giving their evidentiary support
and advocacy in the asserted legal manners of Government CORRUPTION and forgery of
said fake “land parcels”.
FRAUD UPON THE COURT & FRAUD
20. Defendant CROOKED Judge & Judicial Officer Honeywell fraudulently denied Plaintiffs’
well-proven factual contentions of Government CORRUPTION, facially forged “land”
“parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, forged “resolution”,
forged eminent domain and condemnation due process claims , and forged which was not
warranted on the conclusive public record evidence and could not have possibly been based
on belief or a lack of information. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1; PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846,
7
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912);
www.LeeClerk.org.
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
21. Defendant Judicial Officer Honeywell presented her prima facie fraudulent “orders” such as,
e.g., Doc. ## 126, 186, for improper and criminal purposes, and in particular, “harassed” the
Plaintiffs, “caused unnecessary delay”, and “needlessly increased the cost of litigation”. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. In particular, Honeywell knew that Government forged and conspired to
forge and conceal fake “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-
00001.0000”.
OBSTRUCTION OF COURT ACCESS & FILING OF ENTIRE COMPLAINT
22. Defendant Honeywell obstructed the filing of Plaintiffs’ entire Complaint. Here, e.g., pages
101 through 178, and the Exhibits attached to the Complaint disappeared from the Court
files. See Docket. Here, Honeywell never even reviewed and read said Complaint parts.
23. Honeywell concocted purportedly lost electronic filing privileges even though the Court had
consistently obstructed any and all electronic filing. Here, Honeywell denied the Plaintiffs
the equal rights of electronic court access.
HARASSMENT & TERROR
24. Here, Defendant Honeywell [who acted like a “legal prostitute”] harassed the Plaintiff
landowners by fraudulently concealing the truth and record evidence that Plaintiffs’
indisputable factual contentions of said Government CORRUPTION had the fullest
“evidentiary support” and were conclusively proven by the public record. See, e.g., Lee
County PB 3, PG 25 (1912); see also 24 C.F.R. § 203; and 24 C.F.R. § 203.385 Types of
8
satisfactory title evidence; Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1; PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S.
App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; www.LeeClerk.org.
FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT
25. Under Government policy and custom of fraudulently and arbitrarily & capriciously
pretending “vexatiousness”, “frivolity”, and/or “lack of jurisdiction”, Defendant Honeywell
concealed that as a matter of law, the Plaintiffs were the exclusive rightful and
unimpeachable record owners of their riparian Gulf front Parcel “12-44-20-01-00015.015A”,
PB 3, PG 25 (1912) and that Lee County, FL, never owned fake “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-
01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”. Said Defendant Government Official’s
fraudulent denials of Plaintiffs’ factual contentions were not warranted on the public record
evidence and could not have possibly been based on belief or a lack of information. Here, the
public record information, Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable marketable record title evidence, and
the absence of any Lee County ownership, possession, and title evidence had been patently
clearly established. Said facially false and absolutely impossible “vexatiousness” and
“frivolity” allegations on the record were criminal and CORRUPT acts by Defendant
Honeywell [who acted like a “legal prostitute”].
PREMEDITATED MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION
26. Here, Defendant Honeywell knew that Plaintiffs’ claims and legal contentions were fully
warranted by existing law such as, e.g., Chapters 73, 74 (Eminent Domain); 712 (Florida’s
Marketable Record Title Act); 95 (Adverse Possession); 14th, 1st, 4th, 7th, 5th U.S. Const.
Amendments; the Federal and Florida Constitutions; 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242; 28 U.S.C. § 455.
See, e.g., Florida Bar Uniform Title Standards; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912); see also
24 C.F.R. § 203; and 24 C.F.R. § 203.385 Types of satisfactory title evidence;
9
Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1; PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009
WL 1059631; www.LeeClerk.org. Here, Honeywell materially misrepresented, and
conspired with other Defendants and Officials to misrespresent, e.g., “vexatiousness” and
“frivolity” and ordered the Plaintiffs to “show cause” even though the Defendants had the
burden to defend against the prima facie record evidence of Government CORRUPTION and
sham “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, and
sham condemnation “claims” in the record absence of any eminent domain or any other
judicial involuntary alienation proceeding and/or judgment.
SERIAL CRIMINAL CASE FIXING AND COVER-UP
27. Defendant Honeywell perverted and abused Rule 11 as a “tool” to illegally fix Plaintiffs’
Cases. Honeywell knew that co-Defendant John Edwin Steele had fraudulently pretended,
e.g., “lack of jurisdiction” & “frivolity”, and removed Plaintiffs’ legal action in State Court to
Federal Court. After having fraudulently pretended “lack of jurisdiction”, Defendant
CORRUPT Judge Steele was prohibited from ever reaching the merits and faking “frivolity”,
which of course turned on the merits and record evidence of said fake “land” “parcels” and
fraudulent “Government ownership” pretenses.
28. Defendant judicial crook Richard A. Lazzara then harassed Plaintiffs with “Rule 11
sanctions”, which could not have possibly applied to the removed Complaint, which the
Plaintiffs had signed in State Court. Here, the “evidentiary support” of judicial idiocy,
CORRUPTION, fraud, and fraud on the Court was patently clear and crushing. See, e.g.,
Case # 2:2008-cv-00899; 12/05/2008; Florida Bar Uniform Title Standards; Lee County
PB 3, PG 25 (1912); see also 24 C.F.R. § 203; and 24 C.F.R. § 203.385 Types of
10
DELIBERATE PREMEDITATED DEPRIVATIONS
29. Under prima facie fraudulent pretenses of “sanctionability”, “frivolity”, and a “show cause”
hearing on June 22, 2010, Defendant Honeywell deliberately deprived the Plaintiff
unimpeachable landowners. Honeywell knew that Plaintiffs’ factual contentions of said
Government CORRUPTION had the fullest “evidentiary support” and were indisputably
proven by the public record. Furthermore as a matter of law, Plaintiffs were the rightful
owners of their riparian Gulf front Parcel “12-44-20-01-00000.0015A”. Here, Lee County,
FL, never owned fake “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-
00001.0000”. Here Honeywell criminally concealed that Defendant Government Officials’
evidence and could not have possibly been based on belief or a lack of information. See
Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1; Florida Bar Uniform Title Standards; Lee County PB 3, PG 25
(1912); 24 C.F.R. § 203; and 24 C.F.R. § 203.385 Types of satisfactory title evidence;
PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631;
www.LeeClerk.org; Case # 2:2008-cv-00899; 12/05/2008.
CONSPIRACY TO DELIBERATELY DEPRIVE AND DEFRAUD
30. Defendant Honeywell [who acted like a “legal prostitute”] knew that the burden of proof was
upon the Defendant Government Officials and not possibly on the Plaintiffs. Here, no
Defendant had ever presented any valid defense under the Rules and therefore, the
Defendants admitted the well-proven claims for relief and prima facie record evidence of
11
Government CORRUPTION and facially forged “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-
00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”.
31. Honeywell conspired to extend the unlawful Government and judicial policy and pattern to
NEVER NEVER NEVER address and adjudicate the record merits, claims, and legal issues
by playing dumb, claiming “incomprehensibility”, “frivolity”, “vexatiousness”, and “lack of
jurisdiction”. The law expressly prohibited Honeywell’s said record deception, trickery, and
obstruction of justice in favor of the Defendant Government Agents. Like a bungling
Government idiot, Defendant U.S. Agent Honeywell continued the spill of judicial and
Governmental CORRUPTION and never demanded that Lee County and the other
Government Defendants support the frivolous and wrongful denial of the factual contentions
and fully supporting public record evidence.
DECEPTION, BETRAYAL, AND RECUSAL OBLIGATION
32. Honeywell employed “weapons of mass deception” and trickery to pull the wool over the
eyes of innocent landowner victims of Government fraud and CORRUPTION. Honeywell
acted with wanton disregard for the conclusively proven rights of the owners of the more
than approximately 1,200 parcels platted in 1912. See Plat of Survey of private undedicated
“Cayo Costa” Subdivision. Plaintiffs and said other record property owners had the
indisputable and un-controverted rights to own property and exclude Government and to be
free of Government CORRUPTION and terrorizing fraudulent “claims” of “Government
ownership”, which had absolutely no “evidentiary support” and were “frivolous”.
33. Honeywell betrayed the trust of the Plaintiffs and American people and breached her Oath of
Office. Under “color of authority and office”, Honeywell concocted “frivolity”,
“sanctionability”, and “vexatiousness” in order to perpetrate and perpetuate continual fraud
12
upon the Courts, keep the Plaintiffs away from the Court(s), any just and speedy jury trial &
adjudication, and any opportunity of justice, whatsoever.
34. Honeywell was objectively partial and employed criminal means of obstructing justice under
said fraudulent pretenses, and aided and abetted the fraud-extortion-coercion schemes of
concealing bogus “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-
00001.0000”, and fraudulent “Government ownership” contentions that lacked any legal
basis. Honeywell failed to recuse herself and Defendant S. Polster Chappell.
CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL CRIMINAL & FRIVOLOUS GOVERNMENT CLAIMS
35. Defendant Honeywell conspired to criminally conceal that Plaintiffs presented to the Court
pleadings, motions, and/or other papers in conclusive support of Government
CORRUPTION, crimes, and in particular facially forged “land” “parcels” and “claims” of
“Government ownership”, which were totally unrecognized by the law and therefore
“frivolous” and for criminal purposes. Plaintiffs were of course entitled to rely on the public
record, the Lee County Real Property Grantor Grantee Index, and the final dispositive
determination of their unimpeachable record ownership pursuant to Chapter 712, Florida’s
Marketable Record Title Act. Honeywell was estopped from perverting the public record and
deliberately contradicting the affirmation of the public record and evidence by the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS
8678, 2009 WL 1059631; www.LeeClerk.org; Cases ## 2:2007-cv-00228; 2:2008-cv-
00899; Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1; Florida Bar Uniform Title Standards; Lee County PB 3,
PG 25 (1912); 24 C.F.R. § 203; and 24 C.F.R. § 203.385 Types of satisfactory title
evidence.
CONSPIRACY TO FALSELY PRETEND VEXATIOUSNESS & FRIVOLITY SINCE 2007
13
36. Defendant CORRUPT Judge Honeywell knew and criminally concealed that the Plaintiffs
could not have possibly been “vexatious litigants” and that the fraudulent pretenses of
“vexatiousness” were for the criminal purposes of covering up for other Government Agents
and their crimes such as, e.g., fellow Judges John Edwin Steele, Sheri Polster Chappell,
Richard Allan Lazzara, and Mark A. Pizzo, Gerald Bard Tjoflat, Susan Black, who had
fraudulently pretended that facially forged Governmental sham “claim” “O.R. 569/875” was
a “resolution”, title, muniment of title, condemnation/eminent domain judgment/document,
and/or “law”.
37. Instead of correcting and “reviewing” the facially fraudulent pretenses of a “resolution” and
“condemnation-by-forged-claim” without any judicial eminent due process, Honeywell just
repeated the same criminal judicial nonsense and added yet another vile and vexatious layer
of judicial fraud and corruption: “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”.
DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS & EXTENSION OF TITLE FRAUD
38. Under fraudulent pretenses of said “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”-fraud-scheme, Defendant
Honeywell deliberately deprived the Plaintiff unimpeachable record landowners of, e.g., their
fundamental Constitutionally guaranteed rights
a. To own and to exclude Governments from their riparian Gulf-front property, ID #

12-44-20-01-00015.015A;
b. To be free from illegal and coercive, sanctions, punishment, and intimidation;
c. To redress Governmental grievances of record public CORRUPTION and
deliberate deprivations in court;
d. To demand eminent domain due process in a court of law;\
e. To defend against Governmental fraud, corruption, terror, oppression, and abuse
under fraudulent Governmental pretenses of “frivolity” and “vexatiousness”.
Here, any and all of, e.g., Defendant Honeywell’s, Steele’s, Polster Chappell’s, and Lazzara’s
orders were NULL & VOID, because they were procured through fraud and fraud on the
Court. See, e.g., 2:2007-cv-00228; 2:2009-cv-00791; 2:2010-cv-00089.
14
CONCEALMENT OF DEFENDANTS’ CRIMINAL “CLAIM” OF “TITLE”
39. Honeywell knew that Lee County’s and the other Defendants’ forged, non-genuine, and
criminal “claims” and sham arguments were manifestly insufficient and futile, and without
any legal merit, whatsoever. Honeywell knew that no law recognized the fraudulently
“claimed” involuntary alienation and/or title transfer by “resolution” and/or by falsely
pretended “virtue of” Government scam “O.R. 569/875”.
CRIMINAL PERVERSION OF INVOLUNTARY ALIENATION LAW
40. Only a court judgment during judicial eminent domain and/or adverse possession
proceedings could have possibly involuntarily divested the Plaintiffs of their unimpeachable
record ownership of and/or title as dispositively determined by the U.S. Court of Appeals,
11th Circuit. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL
1059631; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912).
CONSPIRACY TO DELIBERATELY DEPRIVE
41. Here, Honeywell conspired with other Defendants and, e.g., judicial Defendants Steele,
Polster Chappell, Gerald Bard Tjoflat, and Susan Black to pervert the law and seize
Plaintiffs’ property under fraudulent pretenses of “frivolity” and “vexatiousness”. See
fraudulent “writ of execution”.
42. Because Honeywell knew that the Defendants were helplessly caught in said conspiracy and
scandal of CORRUPTION, she pulled additional Government scams and fraud-on-the-court-
schemes on the Plaintiffs: “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”.
CONCEALMENT & PERVERSION OF THE RULE OF LAW
43. Defendant Judge Honeywell knew that any genuine “law” and/or “resolution” could have
only restricted and/or regulated the use of land [police power], but could not have possibly
15
transferred any land title to anyone. Rather than admit her idiotic criminal concealment of
the law and facial forgery “O.R. 569/875”, Defendant Honeywell then retaliated by
fraudulent pretenses of “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”, for which she never presented even a
scintilla of evidence. Honeywell’s allegations were facially frivolous, arbitrary, capricious,
and irrational.
RETALIATION AND ARBITRARY & CAPRICIOUS DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS
44. Like a bungling Government crook, Honeywell conspired to confuse the most fundamental
principles of law and pull the wool over the eyes of the Plaintiffs and American people. Here,
Honeywell retaliated with false and fabricated allegations of “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”
to extend the record Governmental obstruction of justice and eminent domain extortion and
fraud scheme “O.R. 569/875”.
“VEXATIOUSNESS”-FRAUD-ON-THE-COURT-SCHEME
45. Judicial Defendant Honeywell perpetrated the “vexatiousness”-fraud-on-the-Court scheme
for the criminal purposes of obstructing justice and the just, speedy, and inexpensive
adjudication of Plaintiffs’ claims for relief. Here in 2010, Judicial Officer Honeywell
perpetrated fraud on the Court, and pursuant to judicial and Governmental policy terrorized
the Plaintiff record unimpeachable landowners with customary judicial threats and
punishments. Here, Honeywell never “reviewed”, and could not have possibly “reviewed”
Plaintiffs’ Complaint, because it was never even filed in its entirety. See 2:2009cv00791;
12/04/2009; Doc. # 1. Here, Honeywell obstructed the orderly filling of Plaintiffs’ Complaint
and deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of any opportunity of justice. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 241,
242.
16
CRIMINAL JUDICIAL LOOPHOLE OR “HARASS-HOLE”: “VEXATIOUSNESS”
46. Defendant crooked Judge C. E. Honeywell harassed and terrorized the Plaintiff
unimpeachable landowners with fabricated allegations of “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”.
Here, Honeywell employed the fraud-schemes of “vexatiousness” and “frivolity” as a
Governmental loophole or “harass-hole” to evade and escape prosecution for the
Governmental corruption and crimes on the record.
47. Here, Defendant Honeywell failed to show good cause why and how the Plaintiff
unimpeachable record landowners’ legal claims for relief could have possibly been
“frivolous” after the U.S. Court of Appeals had affirmed the merits and Plaintiffs’ record
unimpeachable ownership, which directly controverted the facially forged “Lee County”
“land” “claim” “O.R. 569/875”. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS
8678, 2009 WL 1059631; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912).
ESTOPPELL CONTROVERTED “VEXATIOUSNESS”
48. Here, Plaintiffs had every right to defend against said record Governmental corruption and
rely on the judicial affirmation of Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of their
riparian lands. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL
1059631; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912).
HONEYWELL WAS FULL OF “FRIVOLITY”
49. Here in contempt of the law, Honeywell lied, fabricated “vexatiousness”, and could not have
possibly determined that Lee County owned anything. Here, there was not even any legal
description, and Honeywell was full of vexatious and vile “frivolity”. Here, Honeywell
materially misrepresented and criminally concealed the absolute factual and legal
impossibility of “vexatiousness”:
17
“The Appellants are owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in Lee
County, Florida”, Id., p. 2 [riparian waterfront Parcel 12-44-20-01-00015.015A,
as legally described and conveyed to the Plaintiffs in reference to Lee County
Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912)].
See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631;
Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912).
“The Appellants’ Lot 15A is on the west side of the Cayo Costa subdivision on
the Gulf of Mexico and is adjacent to land that was claimed through Resolution
569/875 to create the Cayo Costa State Park.” Id. p. 3.
“VEXATIOUSNESS”-SCHEME TO CONCEAL LACK OF LEE COUNTY TITLE
50. Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell knew that Lee County, Florida, never took title “by
virtue of” sham “claim” “O.R. 569/875” and that fellow U.S. Judge Steele had perverted
Governmental scam “O.R. 569/875” into “law” and/or a “resolution” and unlawfully
disallowed the Plaintiffs to “assert” the truth and record evidence of Governmental
corruption. See 2:2007cv00228; 04/10/2007; Doc. # 338.
51. Here in particular, corrupt Honeywell knew and criminally concealed that “O.R. 569/875”
was
a. NULL & VOID on its face;

b. NOT any genuine and/or authentic Government document;
c. NOT any muniment of title;
d. NOT any eminent domain document;
e. NOT any legitimate “claim”;
f. Facially un-signed by any “lawmaker”;
g. Facially un-executed;
h. Facially forged;
i. Facially lacking any legal description in reference to the Cayo Costa Plat, PB 3, PG
25;
j. Facially lacking any name of any “legislator”;
k. Facially lacking any witness and/or notary’s name.
11TH CIRCUIT CONTROVERTED HONEYWELL’S FRAUDULENT PRETENSES
52. In particular, Honeywell knew that no “resolution” and/or “law”, whatsoever, could have
possibly involuntarily divested the Plaintiffs of their unimpeachable record title as
18
dispositively declared by the 11th U.S. Appellate Circuit. See PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846,
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912).
53. Here, Defendant crooked Honeywell’s fraudulent pretenses and facially false assertions were
CONTROVERTED by said 11th U.S. Appellate Circuit’s dispositive declaration. Id.
DUMB AND DUMBER – JUDGES PLAYING DUMB FOR BRIBES
54. Here, Plaintiffs had rightfully claimed their record ownership, and owned what the records
stated, and what said U.S. Courts affirmed pursuant to the public record. Therefore here,
Honeywell played dumb and dumber when she CONTRADICTED, and conspired to
CONTRADICT, the record and maligned and denigrated the Plaintiffs as “vexatious” and
their record ownership claims as “frivolous”. Here, the objectively corrupt and frivolous
party was patently clearly Defendant Judicial Officer Honeywell.
ABUSE, OPPRESSION, TERROR & OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
55. Defendant Honeywell knew that appeals of Plaintiffs’ existing actions did not count as “final
determinations”. Appeals and writs related to Plaintiff’s current actions did not count as
“final or additional determinations”, because until all avenues of appeal have been exhausted
the determinations could not be construed as “final”. A judgment could only be “final” when
all avenues for review have been exhausted. Here, the Plaintiffs had demanded relief from
fraudulent judgments, orders, and Governmental corruption, because the judgments were
procured through prima facie fraud and fraud on the Court.
CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT ANY “REVIEW” & TO COVER UP U.S. CRIMES
56. Under fraudulent pretenses of “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”, Defendant Honeywell
conspired with other Defendants to obstruct any judicial “review” for the criminal purposes
19
of covering-up said Governmental corruption and fraud and “protecting” fellow judges from
rightful prosecution for, e.g., corruption, bribery, fraud, and deliberate deprivations.
JUDICIAL “VEXATIOUSNESS” & “FRIVOLITY” CHARADE & MOCKERY
57. By criminal means of her entirely unsupported and non-meritorious “vexatiousness” and
“frivolity” charade, Honeywell made a mockery of the judicial proceedings and obstructed
justice. Just like the record Governmental sham “claim” of “lands”, “O.R. 569/875”,
Honeywell’s facially false judicial allegations of “vexatiousness” and “frivolity” were a sham
and scandal. Honeywell obstructed justice and adjudication of Plaintiffs’ claims for relief
under fraudulent pretenses of “frivolity” and “vexatiousness”.
FAILURE TO SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY HONEYWELL WAS NOT CORRUPT
58. Defendant Honeywell failed to show good cause why she was not corrupt and did not
criminally conceal Governmental fabrications and fraudulent pretenses of “Lee County”
ownership of and title to legally un-described “raid lands” “by virtue of” prima facie
Governmental scam “O.R. 569/875”.
COERCION, EXTORTION, AND CORRUPTION
59. Based on the multi-year record of Governmental and judicial corruption, fraud, terror, and
threats, the Plaintiffs fear for their lives. Here, the Plaintiffs provided proof beyond any
reasonable doubt that Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell is deliberately depriving the
Plaintiffs and extending the record corruption and Governmental “vexatiousness”, “frivolity”,
and “O.R. 569/875” coercion, extortion, and fraud schemes.
60. Here, Honeywell has been threatening the Plaintiffs as “vexatious” for the criminal purposes
of, e.g.:
a. Coercing them to refrain from further litigation;
20
b. Defrauding them out of their Gulf-front lands, riparian Parcel # 12-44-20-01-
00015.015A;
c. Deliberately depriving them of judicial adjudication of their claims for relief under
fraudulent pretenses of “frivolity” and “vexatiousness”;
d. Extortion of money, property, and/or “monetary sanctions” under fraudulent pretenses of
“vexatiousness” and “frivolity”;
e. Seizure of Plaintiffs’ property by criminal means.
KNOWINGLY FALSE MIS-STATEMENTS OF MATERIAL FACT
61. As a judicial officer, Honeywell knowingly made facially false statements of fact and law to
said tribunal and failed to correct premeditated mis-statements of material fact and law.
Here, Honeywell knowingly repeated mis-statements by fellow crooked Judges that were
based on fraud on the Court and the deliberate fabrications of “law” / “resolution” [prima
facie Governmental scam “O.R. 569/875”], “vexatiousness”, and “frivolity” with wanton
disregard for Plaintiffs’ fundamental rights under the Federal and Florida Constitutions.
DELIBERATE OBSTRUCTION OF COURT ACCESS
62. Honeywell obstructed Plaintiffs electronic court access and privileges in this electronic
Court in order to deliberately deprive the Plaintiffs of their equal rights of court access and
just, speedy, and inexpensive adjudication, thereby injuring the Plaintiffs and placing them at
a massive disadvantage. In particular, Judicial Officer Honeywell lied on the record and
arbitrarily and capriciously fabricated lost electronic filing privileges.
PUBLICATIONS OF GOVERNMENTAL CORRUPTION AND FRAUD EVIDENCE
63. This Complaint is published at http://www.scribd.com/Judicial%20Fraud. Here, more
than 125,000 readers have read the contemptuous and criminal acts by U.S. Judges in said
Court.
21
DEFENDANT CROOKED U.S. JUDGE SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL
64. The Plaintiffs are suing Defendant CROOKED Government Official Sheri Polster Chappell
in her private individual and official capacity as U.S. Magistrate Judge, Agent, and Official.
65. Defendant Chappell denied and conspired with other Government Officials to deny to
Plaintiffs the equal protection of the laws, and to injure them and their property for lawfully
enforcing, and attempting to enforce, their rights to the equal protection of the laws. See
Transcript of 11/07/2007 Hearing; prima facie illegal and fraudulent Rule 11 Sanctions. See
any and all Orders pertaining to Chappell’s fraudulent “writ of execution”.
66. In court(s) of the United States, Chappell deterred and conspired to deter, by force,
intimidation, threats, “orders” (e.g., 2:2009-cv-00791), and a hearing scheduled for June 22,
2010, the Plaintiffs and witnesses from attending such court, and from testifying to the legal
matters of, e.g., Government CORRUPTION and Government “land robbery” by forgery of
said “land parcels” pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, and to injure the Plaintiffs
and other “Cayo Costa” Subdivision landowners, PB 3, PG 25 (1925), and witnesses.
67. Under false pretenses of, e.g., “frivolity” and “vexatiousness”, Chappell obstructed justice
and conspired with other Government Officials for the purposes of impeding, hindering,
obstructing, or defeating, in various manners, the due course of justice. In particular,
Chappell conspired to make a fraudulent “writ of execution”, 2:2007-cv-00228, and hinder
Plaintiffs’ rights to own their property and exclude Governments, and Lee County, which
fraudulently asserted “Government ownership” of said fake “land” “parcels”.
22
PRIMA FACIE SCAMS OF LIEN & WRIT OF EXECUTION & ORDER FOR SALE
68. By criminal means of a fraudulent writ of execution, 2:2007-cv-00228, Chappell conspired
with other Defendants and Lee County Defendants to illegally enforce a “lien”, which Lee
County Defendants attached to land that Defendants had “claimed” to be “Lee County
owned” and /or “Government owned”. Said “frivolously” alleged “Government ownership”
claims were thereby defeated as an obvious prima facie scam.
69. Just like Honeywell, Chappell scheduled a hearing on Nov. 7, 2007, for the purposes of
depriving, directly and indirectly, the Plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws, and of the
equal privileges and immunities under the laws; and for the purposes of preventing and
hindering U.S. authorities from securing to Plaintiffs and “Cayo Costa” Subdivision
landowners the equal protection of the laws.
70. In exchange for Defendants’ bribes, and before the Plaintiff(s) had even filed their “Third
Amended Complaint” (2:2007-cv-00228; Doc. ## 282; 288), Chappell fabricated and
conspired with Lee County Defendants to fabricate “frivolity” and to obstruct justice and
Plaintiffs’ court access (Doc. # 252).
71. Chappell had conspired with other Defendants and Lee County Defendants to schedule said
hearing to prevent by force, intimidation, “orders”, and/or threats of record, said Plaintiffs,
who were lawfully entitled to prosecute, from giving their evidentiary support and advocacy
in the asserted legal manners of Government CORRUPTION and forgery of said fake “land
parcels”.
23
72. Defendant CROOKED Judge & Judicial Officer Chappell fraudulently denied Plaintiffs’
well-proven factual contentions of Government CORRUPTION, facially forged “land”
“parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, forged “resolution”,
forged eminent domain and condemnation due process claims , and forged which was not
warranted on the conclusive public record evidence and could not have possibly been based
on belief or a lack of information. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1; PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846,
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912);
www.LeeClerk.org.
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE & NAME CALLING
73. Defendant Judicial Officer Chappell presented her prima facie fraudulent “writ of execution”,
“orders”, reports, and recommendations for improper and criminal purposes, and in
particular, “harassed” the Plaintiffs, “caused unnecessary delay”, and “needlessly increased
the cost of litigation”. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. In particular, Chappell knew that Government
forged and conspired to forge and conceal fake “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”
and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000”. Chappell called Plaintiffs names such as, e.g., “vexatious
litigants” even though the Court had falsely pretended and asserted “lack of jurisdiction”.
HARASSMENT & TERROR
74. Here, Defendant Chappell harassed the Plaintiff landowners by fraudulently concealing the
truth and record evidence that Plaintiffs’ indisputable factual contentions of said Government
CORRUPTION had the fullest “evidentiary support” and were conclusively proven by the
public record. See, e.g., Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912); see also 24 C.F.R. § 203; and 24
C.F.R. § 203.385 Types of satisfactory title evidence; Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1;
24
www.LeeClerk.org.
pretending “vexatiousness”, “frivolity”, and/or “lack of jurisdiction”, Defendant Chappell
concealed that as a matter of law, the Plaintiffs were the exclusive rightful and
“frivolity” allegations on the record were criminal and CORRUPT acts by Defendant
Chappell.
76. Here, Defendant Chappell knew that Plaintiffs’ claims and legal contentions were fully
25
WL 1059631; www.LeeClerk.org. Here, Chappell materially misrepresented, and conspired
with other Defendants and Officials to misrespresent, e.g., “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”
and ordered the Plaintiffs to “show cause” even though the Defendants had the burden to
defend against the prima facie record evidence of Government CORRUPTION and sham
“land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, and sham
condemnation “claims” in the record absence of any eminent domain or any other judicial
involuntary alienation proceeding and/or judgment.
SERIAL CRIMINAL CASE FIXING AND COVER-UP
77. Defendant Chappell perverted and abused Rule 11 as a “tool” to illegally fix Plaintiffs’
Cases. Chappell knew that co-Defendant John Edwin Steele had fraudulently pretended, e.g.,
“lack of jurisdiction” & “frivolity”, and removed Plaintiffs’ legal action in State Court to
Federal Court. After having fraudulently pretended “lack of jurisdiction”, Defendant
CORRUPT Judge Steele was prohibited from ever reaching the merits and faking “frivolity”,
which of course turned on the merits and record evidence of said fake “land” “parcels” and
fraudulent “Government ownership” pretenses.
78. Defendant judicial crook Richard A. Lazzara then harassed Plaintiffs with “Rule 11
sanctions”, which could not have possibly applied to the removed Complaint, which the
Plaintiffs had signed in State Court. Here, the “evidentiary support” of judicial idiocy,
CORRUPTION, fraud, and fraud on the Court was patently clear and crushing. See, e.g.,
Case # 2:2008-cv-00899; 12/05/2008; Florida Bar Uniform Title Standards; Lee County
PB 3, PG 25 (1912); see also 24 C.F.R. § 203; and 24 C.F.R. § 203.385 Types of
26
DEFENDANT CROOKED U.S. JUDGE JOHN EDWIN STEELE
79. The Plaintiffs are suing Defendant CROOKED Government Official Steele in his private
individual and official capacity as U.S. District Judge, Agent, and Official.
80. Defendant Steele denied and conspired with other Government Officials to deny to Plaintiffs
the equal protection of the laws, and to injure them and their property for lawfully enforcing,
and attempting to enforce, their rights to the equal protection of the laws. See, e.g. 2:2007-
cv-00228; Doc. # 338.
81. CORRUPTLY, Steele declared land ownership not to be a FUNDAMENTAL right in
America and “disallowed” the Plaintiffs to assert the truth of the prima facie nullity and
criminality of sham paper “O.R. 569/875”. Steele concealed the record absence of any Lee
County ownership and title to said fake “land” “parcels”.
82. In court(s) of the United States, Steele deterred and conspired to deter, by force, intimidation,
threats, “orders” (e.g., 2:2007-cv-00228; Doc. 338; Doc. # 338, p. 12), the Plaintiffs and
witnesses from attending such court, and from testifying to the legal matters of, e.g.,
Government CORRUPTION and Government “land robbery” pending therein, freely, fully,
and truthfully, and to injure the Plaintiffs and other “Cayo Costa” Subdivision landowners,
PB 3, PG 25 (1925), and witnesses.
27
83. In particular, Steele illegally blocked any filing of any further pleading by the Plaintiffs,
2:2007-cv-00228, so that Steele and Chappell can sodomize the Plaintiffs and ram-rod the
unlawful “writ of execution” up Plaintiffs’ behinds. Steele’s null and void orders were
procured through fraud, fraud on the Court, and the concealment of said bogus “land”
“parcels” under fraudulent pretenses of “frivolity”. Even though Steele had “claimed” “lack
of jurisdiction”, Steele fabricated “frivolity” the determination of which has been absolutely
impossible in the purported absence of “jurisdiction”. Steele conspired to enforce a “lien”
fraudulently attached to land that Defendants had “claimed” to be “Government owned”.
How much dumber and more CORRUPT will it get? Here, Steele knew that Defendants’
false “Government ownership” “claim” had been non-meritorious and facially “frivolous”.
However, Steele punished the Plaintiffs and blocked any and all filings so that Steele can
continue his dirty work of CORRUPTION and deliberate deprivations.
84. Under false pretenses of, e.g., “frivolity” and “vexatiousness”, Steele obstructed justice and
conspired with other Government Officials for the purposes of impeding, hindering,
obstructing, or defeating, in various manners, the due course of justice. In particular, Steele
conspired to hinder Plaintiffs’ rights to own their property and exclude Governments, and
Lee County, which fraudulently asserted “Government ownership” of said fake “land”
“parcels”. Here. Steele fixed Plaintiffs’ Cases. Steele removed Plaintiffs’ Case from State to
Federal and then had the State Court evidence “removed”. See Docket, 2:2008-cv-00899.
Steele then fraudulently pretended that Plaintiff had not pursued “relief in State Court”.
85. Steele concealed said forged “land parcels” for the purposes of depriving, directly and
indirectly, the Plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws, and of the equal privileges and
28
immunities under the laws; and for the purposes of preventing and hindering U.S. authorities
from securing to Plaintiffs and “Cayo Costa” Subdivision landowners the equal protection of
the laws.
86. Defendant CROOKED Judge & Judicial Officer Steele fraudulently denied Plaintiffs’ well-
proven factual contentions of Government CORRUPTION, facially forged “land” “parcels”
“12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, forged “resolution”, forged
eminent domain and condemnation due process claims , and forged which was not warranted
on the conclusive public record evidence and could not have possibly been based on belief or
a lack of information. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1; PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846, 2009 U.S.
App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912);
www.LeeClerk.org.
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
87. Defendant Judicial Officer Steele presented her prima facie fraudulent “orders” such as, e.g.,
said Doc. ## 338, for improper and criminal purposes, and in particular, “harassed” the
Plaintiffs, “caused unnecessary delay”, and “needlessly increased the cost of litigation”. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. In particular, Steele knew that Government forged and conspired to forge
and conceal fake “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-
00001.0000”. After faking “frivolity” without any valid explanation and concealing said
Government corruption and fake “land” “parcels”, Steele has been conspiring to enforce a
fraudulent “lien” and “writ of execution” from which the Plaintiffs sought relief in their
independent actions. Here, Steele totally blocked the filing of any pleading, 2:2007-cv-
29
00228, under fraudulent pretenses of “frivolity” for criminal purposes of seizing land and
deliberately depriving the Plaintiffs.
DEFENDANT CROOKED ASS. U.S. ATTORNEY JENNIFER WAUGH CORINIS
DEFENDANT U.S. ATTORNEY A. BRIAN ALBRITTON
88. The Plaintiffs are suing Defendant CROOKED Government Officials Jennifer Waugh
Corinis and A. Brian Albritton (supervisor of Defendant Corinis) in their private individual
and official capacities as U.S. Assistant Attorney and U.S. Attorney, Agents, and Officials.
HARASSMENT & TERROR
89. Here, Defendant Waugh Corinis [who acted like a “legal prostitute”] and her supervising
U.S. Attorney Albritton harassed the Plaintiff landowners by fraudulently concealing the
truth and record evidence that Plaintiffs’ indisputable factual contentions of said Government
CORRUPTION had the fullest “evidentiary support” and were conclusively proven by the
public record. See, e.g., Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912); see also 24 C.F.R. § 203; and 24
C.F.R. § 203.385 Types of satisfactory title evidence; Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1;
www.LeeClerk.org.
pretending “vexatiousness”, “frivolity”, and/or “lack of jurisdiction”, Defendant Waugh
Corinis concealed that as a matter of law, the Plaintiffs were the exclusive rightful and
30
“frivolity” allegations on the record were criminal and CORRUPT acts by Defendant J.
Waugh Corinis [who acted like a “legal prostitute”].
91. Here, Defendant Corinis knew that Plaintiffs’ claims and legal contentions were fully
WL 1059631; www.LeeClerk.org. Here, Corinis materially misrepresented, and conspired
with other Defendants and Officials to misrepresent, e.g., “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”
even though the Defendants had the burden to defend against the prima facie record evidence
of Government CORRUPTION and sham “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and
“07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, and sham condemnation “claims” in the record absence of any
eminent domain or any other judicial involuntary alienation proceeding and/or judgment.
31
CONCEALMENT OF SERIAL CRIMINAL CASE FIXING AND COVER-UP
92. Defendant Corinis perverted and abused “sanctions” and/or Rule 11 as a “tool” to illegally
get Plaintiffs’ Cases fixed. In fact, Defendant Judge Honeywell had previously denied Rule
11 sanctions. See, e.g., 2:2009-cv-00791; March 25, 2010 “order”. Corinis knew that co-
Defendant John Edwin Steele had fraudulently pretended, e.g., “lack of jurisdiction” &
“frivolity”, and removed Plaintiffs’ legal action in State Court to Federal Court. After having
fraudulently pretended “lack of jurisdiction”, Defendant CORRUPT Judge Steele was
prohibited from ever reaching the merits and faking “frivolity”, which of course turned on
the merits and record evidence of said fake “land” “parcels” and fraudulent “Government
ownership” pretenses.
93. Here. all Defendants knew that Defendant judicial crook Richard A. Lazzara then harassed
Plaintiffs with “Rule 11 sanctions”, which could not have possibly applied to the removed
Complaint, which the Plaintiffs had signed in State Court. Here, the “evidentiary support” of
judicial idiocy, CORRUPTION, fraud, and fraud on the Court was patently clear and
crushing. See, e.g., Case # 2:2008-cv-00899; 12/05/2008; Florida Bar Uniform Title
Standards; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912); see also 24 C.F.R. § 203; and 24 C.F.R. §
203.385 Types of satisfactory title evidence; Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1; PRESCOTT, No.
08-14846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; www.LeeClerk.org.
DELIBERATE PREMEDITATED DEPRIVATIONS
94. Under prima facie fraudulent pretenses of “sanctionability”, “frivolity”, and a “frivolous”
“show cause” demand, Defendant Corinis deliberately deprived the Plaintiff unimpeachable
landowners. Corinis knew that Plaintiffs’ factual contentions of said Government
CORRUPTION had the fullest “evidentiary support” and were indisputably proven by the
32
public record. Furthermore as a matter of law, Plaintiffs were the rightful owners of their
riparian Gulf front Parcel “12-44-20-01-00000.0015A”. Here, Lee County, FL, never owned
fake “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”. Here
Corinis criminally concealed that Defendant Government Officials’ fraudulent denials of
Plaintiffs’ factual contentions were not warranted on the public record evidence and could
not have possibly been based on belief or a lack of information. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 1;
Florida Bar Uniform Title Standards; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912); 24 C.F.R. § 203;
and 24 C.F.R. § 203.385 Types of satisfactory title evidence; PRESCOTT, No. 08-14846,
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; www.LeeClerk.org; Case # 2:2008-cv-
00899; 12/05/2008.
CONSPIRACY TO DELIBERATELY DEPRIVE AND DEFRAUD
95. Defendant Corinis [who acted like a “legal prostitute”] knew that the burden of proof was
upon the Defendant Government Officials and not possibly on the Plaintiffs. Here, no
Defendant had ever presented any valid defense under the Rules and therefore, the
Defendants admitted the well-proven claims for relief and prima facie record evidence of
Government CORRUPTION and facially forged “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-
00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”.
96. Corinis conspired to extend the unlawful Government and judicial policy and pattern to
NEVER NEVER NEVER address and defend against the record merits, claims, and legal
issues by playing dumb, claiming “incomprehensibility”, “frivolity”, “vexatiousness”, and
“lack of jurisdiction”. The law expressly prohibited Corinis’ record deception, trickery, and
obstruction of justice. Like a bungling Government idiot, Defendant U.S. Agent Corinis
continued the spill of judicial and Governmental CORRUPTION. Rather than defend against
33
the record evidence of Government CORRUPTION according to the Rules, Corinis
conspired to extend the frivolous and wrongful denial of the factual contentions of
CORRUPTION and “land robbery” and fully supporting public record evidence.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs demand
1. An Order declaring any and all previous orders, judgments, and rulings null and void,
because they were procured through fraud, fraud on the Court, deception and trickery;
2. An Order for relief from fraud & fraud upon the Federal Courts;
3. An Order striking and vacating any and all of Defendant Honeywell’s, Chappell’s, and
Steele’s orders in any and all tabulated and related Cases as null & void, because they were
procured through fraud, and in particular, an Order striking and setting aside said June 22,
2010, hearing, 2:2009-cv-00791, “writ of execution”, any and all “liens” against Plaintifffs’
property, obstruction of court access orders, and any forced sale order, 2:2007-cv-00228;
4. An Order compelling each and every Defendant in any and all related and associated Cases
to show cause why they did not conceal and conspire to conceal said “land” “parcel”
forgeries on the public record and the record absence of any “Lee County” and/or
“Government ownership” according to Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1912);
5. An Order changing the venue out of Florida and to a non-corrupt court;
6. An Order recusing any and all Judges previously involved in said concealment of
Government CORRUPTION and forged “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and
”07-44-21-01-00001.0000” under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, and 28 U.S.C. § 455;
7. An Order for equitable relief;
34
8. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining and all Defendants, Governments, and their Agents and
Officials from concealing the prima facie criminality and nullity of forged and non-existent
“land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
9. An Order affirming the record absence of any title evidence or “Lee County” or
“Government ownership” and Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable marketable record title and
ownership under Florida and Federal law;
10. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendants, Governments, and their Agents from
any forced sale and seizure of Plaintiffs’ riparian property on the Gulf of Mexico, Parcel 12-
44-20-01-00015.015A;
11. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining the Defendant Governments and Agents from the
criminal seizure of Plaintiffs’ Gulf-front property under fraudulent pretenses of “frivolity”,
“sanctionability”, and “vexatiousness”;
12. An Order for compensatory damages;
13. An Order for punitive damages;
14. An Order directing Federal and Florida law enforcement agencies to investigate the well-
proven crimes and forgeries of said fake “land” “parcels” by said Government Officials.
___________________________________
/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff, pro se
P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295
____________________________________
/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff, pro se, JRBU@aol.com
State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Lic. Real Estate & Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor
EXHIBITS
CC: Federal Bureau of Investigation

U.S. Justice Department; The White House
Florida Department of Law Enforcement
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59

Experts at The Crime Scene - Impeaching Crooked U.S. Judge Honeywell

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Experts at The Crime Scene - Impeaching Crooked U.S. Judge Honeywell

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Legal Descriptions

“legal description” from hell:

Scott Gardner Hawkins Practice Groups

jones-foster.com/scott hawkins bio.htm 1/2

Judge Charlene E. Honeywell

Search Law School Search Cornell

LII / Lega l Inform a tion Institute

TITLE 42 > C HAPTER 21 > SUBC HAPTER I > § 1985

§ 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights

(2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror

(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges

Dona tions cover only

CERTIFIED FACSIMILE TO 239-461-2179

RE: PRESCOTT v. HONEYWELL, 2:2010-cv-00390

YOUR PATTERN OF CORRUPTION, CONCEALMENT, & FRAUD ON COURT

Fraudulent Pretenses of “Lee County” “ownership” of fake “land” ”parcels”;

Dear Honey from Hell:

Enter Party Name Search Dockets Show Options

Prescott et al v. Alejo et al Share |

Case Number: 2:2009cv00791

Court: Florida Middle District Court

County: XX US, Outside State

Presiding Judge: Judge Unassigned Judge

Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights

Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

Date Filed # Document Text

JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, DR. JORG BUSSE,

versus Case # 2:10-cv-

CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL;

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

RECORD CORRUPTION & CONTEMPT OF THE LAW BY U.S. AGENTS

“frivolity”, “sanctionability”, “vexatiousness”, and “lack of jurisdiction”. In particular, this

Court has jurisdiction over Governmental bribery, CORRUPTION, Governmental forgery of

fake “land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, and

execution”, 2:2007-cv-00228-JES-SPC, which was procured through fraud, fraud on the

of perverting and abusing Fed.R.Civ.P. 11.

proceedings. In particular, said Government Agents deliberately disrespected, e.g.:

a. 1st U.S. Constitutional Amendment;

ADOPTION OF RELATED/ASSOCIATED PLEADINGS BY REFERENCE

Plaintiffs adopt Plaintiffs’ Notices of Appeal from Defendant Honeywell’s fraudulent

00791, and 2:2010-00089.

HISTORY OF GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION, FRAUD, FRAUD ON THE COURTS

Court Case No. Filed NOS Closed

CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION

44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000” had been patently clear and

6. Government Officials frivolously and criminally asserted “Government ownership” even

44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000” had never existed and could not be

very property, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, Governments had previously claimed to be

“land” “parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and ”07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, which had

transfer or creation of any property interest in the name of “Lee County”.

PERVERSIONS OF TITLE STANDARDS AND EVIDENCE

Government custom, policy and pattern of CORRUPTION and fraudulent “Government

LEXIS 8678, 2009 WL 1059631; www.LeeClerk.org.

RECORD JUDICIAL DENIGRATION OF THE PLAINTIFFS AS “VEXATIOUS”:

STEAMROLLING, “SHUTTING UP” & “CROTCH KICKING” THE PLAINTIFFS

fraudulent pretenses of “vexatiousness” and “frivolity”, corrupt Judge Honeywell deliberately

“vexatiousness”, “frivolity”, and “O.R. 569/875” extortion-coercion-fraud-schemes tarnished

fraudulently pretending “vexatiousness” and “frivolity” instead of demanding Defendants’

defenses and answers according to the Rules of Civil Procedure.

PLAINTIFFS DEFEND AGAINST RECORD JUDICIAL CORRUPTION

DEMAND FOR CHANGE OF OBJECTIVELY CORRUPT VENUE

Affirmation of ownership. Id. Here, Honeywell was ESTOPPED from fraudulently