Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
models of degradation
Meteorizacin y degradacin de rocas arcillosas: observaciones
experimentales y modelos de degradacin
E.E. Alonso & J.A. Pineda
Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Geosciences
Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Abstract
Mechanisms leading to degradation of shales are first described from a qualitative perspective. Stress changes and
suction cycles are stressed as important contributors. The effect of these two effects on the degradation of clay
rocks around tunnels are then described, following recent results of a few large scale experiments performed in
underground rock mechanic laboratories. Also, examples of claystone degradation in excavations exposed to
atmospheric action are reviewed. A number of laboratory experiments, which involve, in general, the application of
loading and suction cycles are presented. They highlight the relevance of extreme suction cycles and the importance
of rock mineral constituents. Constitutive models for bonded soils are aoutlined. The most recent developments
describe the clay rock as a composite of an elastoplastic clay matrix and a brittle damage model for the bond
constituents. The paper ends with the description of a model in which the clay matrix model expands and shrinks
under suction cycles. Then, realistic predictions of weathering effect can be made.
Resumen
Se describen inicialmente, de forma cualitativa, los mecanismos que contribuyen a la degradacin de rocas
arcillosas. Se destacan dos mecanismos: los cambios de tensin y los ciclos de succin. Su efecto sobre la
degradacin de la roca en el contorno de tneles se ha descrito a partir de unos pocos ensayos a gran escala
realizados en laboratorios subterrneos de mecnica de rocas. Se resumen tambin algunos casos de degradacin de
arcillitas expuestas a la accin atmosfrica en excavaciones. Se describen algunos ensayos de laboratorio que
someten a la roca a ciclos de carga descarga y de cambios de succin. Los ciclos extremos de succin y la
composicin mineralgica son dos aspectos fundamentales para explicar la degradacin. Se presentan varios
modelos constitutivos recientes que describen la roca como un material compuesto. La matriz se representa
mediante un modelo elastoplstico y la cementacin mediante un modelo de dao. El artculo termina con la
descripcin de un modelo constitutivo que permite la expansin y el hinchamiento de la matriz bajo cambios de
succin, lo que permite hacer predicciones realistas de los efectos de la alteracin.
1. AN OVERVIEW
MECHANISMS
OF
WEATHERING
2. FIELD
CASES
ILLUSTRATING
WEATHERING EFFECTS IN CLAYEY
ROCKS
2.1
Tunnels
Due to the presence of tectonic faults and postexcavation flaking, the galleries excavated in 1996
and 2003 were supported with steel sets spaced 12m apart and the roof was covered with a steel
mesh. In order to study the influence of two types
of support on the development of EDZ, the first
10-m section of the main gallery were
concreted. Cross sections of the main tunnel and
the other two galleries are shown in Figure 3.
During and after excavation stage, tree types of
cracks were observed: fractures at the wall
induced by decompression, existing tectonic.
fractures and sets of horizontal cracks developed
shortly after the pass of the excavation front
parallel to the bedding planes. Moreover, opening
and closing of cracks was observed as a result of
the saturation and de-saturation processes of the
argillaceous media due to seasonal variations
(temperature and relative humidity) (Vals et al,
2004).
contraction/expansion
cycles
and
this
phenomenon leads to the generation of an EDZ.
The influence of fault zones was also studied by
Rejeb & Cabrera (2006). They showed that the
EDZ is denser and less extended at the
intersection of the east gallery with the tunnel.
This is due to the fact the in-situ stresses are
locally modified by the presence of a tectonic
fault. For this reason the EDZ is non-symmetrical
with respect to this fault as can be seen in Figure
5.
Figure
10.Layout
of
the
Mont
Terri
laboratory
(Thury
&
Bossart,
1999)
length), (ii) a road header, and, (iii) a pneumatic
hammer. In all cases, water was not used during
excavation to avoid swelling of the rock. The final
cross section had a horseshoe shape section with
256
Figure 14.Permeability variation around the new gallery (Bossart et al, 2004)
Effect of wetting and drying cycles: VE
Ventilation test in Mont Terri Laboratory on
Opalinus Clay
The test consists in the ventilation of 10m long
section of a non-lined micro-tunnel, 1.3m in
diameter, in the Mont Terri laboratory, (see
Figure 16). The micro-tunnel was excavated in
February of 1999 but the ventilation experiment
(VE) did not started until July of 2002, after a 3
year long instrumentation phase. During the
314
100
560
1079
RH-HyV-In
RH-HyCnt-L
T-HyCnt-L
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
500
1000
1500
Section A1
2
BVE-78
BVE-81
0.5m
MT
0
1m
-1
BVE-79
BVE-80
-2
1m
-3
-3
1200
105
-2
-1
314 350
252
0
560
713
2
1079
1534
P-B78/2.10
P-B79/2.10
P-B80/1.80
P-B81/1.80
Series13
Series12
413
1000
Pressure [kPa]
800
600
400
200
0
0
Section A1
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2.2
Excavations
w (%)
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-5
Depth (m)
-10
LL (weathered)
LL (unaltered)
LP (weathered)
LP (unaltered)
w (unaltered)
w (intact)
-15
-20
-25
-30
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
-5
Depth (m)
-10
-15
-20
-30
90
Unweathered sample
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
' v =32kPa
500
400
300
' v =42kPa
200
100
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Figure
27.Stress-displacement
curve
for
Pamplona marl in direct shear tests. Shearing at
natural and saturated condition (modified from
Pineda et al, 2006)
2.2.2 Tectonized clay shales of Italy
Figure
34.Stress-strain
relationship
of
unweathered and fully weathered Keuper marl
(c=10 lb/sq.in) (Chandler, 1969)
A classical example of the geological
evolution of clayey shale was presented by
Bjerrum (1967) for Bearpaw shale at the Fork
Peck dam site in Canada. Bearpaw shale is
highly overconsolidated and strongly cemented
clay with a liquid limit ranging from 90% to
120%. Montmorillonite is present in different
percentages.
Bjerrum presented unloading
curves in terms of water content values obtained
in different zones and subjected to different
degrees of weathering (Figure 35, where the
shale behaviour under remoulded state is also
OBSERVATIONS
IN
Tournemire shale
3.3
Figure
51.One-dimensional
swelling
of
unweathered Bisaccia clay (Picarelli et al, 2000)
271
4.1
273
( ))
g
1 g
f
=
rs H rs ij & ij
where
f k g
H =
k rsp rs
is the hardening modulus.
Bonding is characterized in terms of the
difference in void ratio e between the normal
consolidation line (NCL) and the current
compression line for a particular value of p. In a
triaxial space (q, p), bonding increases the yield
surface which grows towards the right increasing
the elastic domain and towards the left increasing
the real cohesion and the tensile strength (see
Figure 57). Two parameters controls the yield
surface of bonded soil: pco that reflects the yield
stress of the bonded soil under isotropic
compression and pt , related to the cohesion and
the tensile strength. Both parameters increase
when bonding increases. These parameters are
linked with bonding as follows:
p co
p
= f (b) and t = f t (b)
pc
pc
where b is a non-dimensional variable
representing the amount of bonding. In the first
case, f(b) tends to 1 when b tends to 0, but in the
second case, pt tends to zero as b decreases.
&rsp =
Figure
57.Influence
of
bonding
on
compressibility and yielding of structured
materials (Gens & Nova, 1993)
The evolution of yielding conditions was
controlled by the unbonded plastic hardening (or
softening) and by bond degradation represented
by their hardening modulus Hs and Hb,
respectively. In that case the hardening modulus
H is the sum of two terms:
H = Hs + Hd
Hs produces an enlargement or reduction of
the elastic domain as for the unbonded soil. Hd
produces a shrinkage of the yield surface due to
bond degradation. This degradation can be
related to a damage measure, which must depend
to the plastic strains. Gens & Nova (1993)
+ *2 ( 1) * = 0
f 3( 3) ln
9
p co
2
274
'*
p
To specify the relationships between bonding
parameter b and pco and pt they defined:
f (b) = p co p c = 1 + b
f t (b) = pt p c = t b
The function of the bond degradation with
increasing damage (h) was defined as:
b = bo e (h ho )
where the variation of the damage parameter is
given by:
dh = h1 d qp + h2 d vp
This expression implies that damage increases
monotonically independently of the sign of the
plastic strains. Both, plastic compression and
dilation contribute to the degradation of the
material. Plastic shear strains cause also damage.
The hardening of the unbonded component is
assumed isotropic, and in particular, a single
hardening parameter for triaxial condition is
defined by
p
p
p& c = cp &vp + cp & qp = 0
v
q
Nova (1988) included the deviatoric plastic
strains in the hardening law expression in the
form:
1
p
p 2 2
v + 3 2 q
p c = ( p c ) i exp
Bp
+ *2 ( 1) * = 0
g 9( 3) ln
9
p co
2
( ))
275
4.5
model
(2000)
Rouainia & Wood (2000) developed a rateindependent constitutive model for structured
natural clays formulated on the basis of
kinematic hardening, including also ingredients
of bounding surface plasticity (Dafalias, 1986).
The advantage of the kinematic hardening
models is that it allows saving information about
the recent stress history of the soil introducing an
additional surface (bubble). This bubble can
move within the large-yield surface (bounding
surface) according to the current stress state
VVoids
is the total void ratio,
VSolids
V
eb = bonds is a measure of the volume occupied
VSolids
by bonds,
e=
Vbonds + VVoids
is a measure of the volume
V Solids
not occupied by the clay matrix.
eM =
276
)
q b q b 0 = (1 D )Gb 0 qb = Gb 0 qb = Gb qb
1 D
(Carol et al, 2001). L depends only on the elastic
energy defined as
ub =
[( p
pb 0 ) vb + (qb qb 0 ) qb
)
)
vb = e L vb and qb = e L qb
K b = e L K b 0 and Gb = e L Gb 0
d qb
d
+ (q b qb 0 ) qb
q = q M 1 +
d q
d q
p = (1 + ) p M + ( pb pb 0 )
q = (1 + )q M + (qb qb 0 )
277
vb e L
where =
= 0e L .
v
Vaunat & Gens (2003) applied this model to
simulate the behaviour of two materials. First,
they simulated an isotropic compression test on a
structured synthetic clay. Then, they applied
their model to reproduce the mechanical
behaviour of a tertiary sedimentary mudstone of
low porosity with a content of calcium content
close to 20% (Callovo-Oxfordian clay).
In this case, the failure surface of the intact
material was taken as:
(q + qt )2 m
(q + qt ) m( p + pt ) Rc = 0
3
Rc
where Rc = RcM (1 + ) . For this case, the
variation of the Young modulus is given by
(from the isotropic part of the elastic law):
E = (1 + 0 )E M (1 + 0 ) + 0 E b 0 0
Results of simulation on Callovo-Oxfordian
clay are shown in Figure 64 in which simulated
shear strength values are compared with
experimental data. Experimental results lie inside
the zone defined by the structured and
destructured material.
(a)
(b)
Figure 67.Simulation of in-situ stress variation
due to the HE niche excavation: (a) horizontal
stress, (b) vertical stress (Muoz & Alonso,
2005a)
Figure 70 shows the effective stress path
followed by a point of the rock mass located
close the rock-bentonite interface (r = 18cm).
Results of model suggest that this point reaches
limit conditions at some instant during hydration.
Once the initial strength envelope is hit, limited
rock degradation is produced. The stress path
279
4.6
9
8
Heating stage
First yield
J [MPa]
6
Initial yield surfase
Hydration
4
3
Cooling stage
Borehole drilling
Niche excavation
0
-2
-1
10
K ( ) = cos( )
where
sin sin ,
and
3
.
In
this
case
is the tensile
a = c cot
strength, c is the cohesion and is the friction
angle.
P
vp
Sliding
Element
(f)
Dashpot
()
Spring
c = c0 1 Sc ( ) 0 tan 0 ( S ( ) Sc ( ) )
c0
// Y
Z'
Lin
eo
t ou
X'
n
co
fd
Y'
ip
Isotropic plane
vp
QJ
QM
= M ( F ) M
+ J (F )J
Mohr - Coulomb
Hyperbolic
yield surface
res
0
Mean stress (p)
Hyperbolic
yield surface
res
20
0
Normal stress in the joint plane (N)
15
10
5
Vertical stress - Dip
Model
Laboratory test
0
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
Dip () []
-5
Stress [MPa]
Stresses
Radial stress (Borehole wall X direction)
Circumferential stress (Borehole wall X direction)
Vertical stress (Borehole wall X direction)
Radial stress (Borehole wall Y direction)
Circumferential stress (Borehole wall Y direction)
Vertical stress (Borehole wall Y direction)
Radial stress(Isotropic model)
Circumferential stress (Isotropic model)
Vertical stress (Isotropic model)
Borehole BHE-0
20.00 m
20
.30
5
0
m
.30
20
400
600
800
1000
1200
Time [days]
1400
1600
1800
2000
200
Plastic zone
e = 0.08 m
Borehole
1
Liquid pressure
1- Model Rock (r = 0.65m z = -5.00m)
2- Model Rock (r = 1.65m z = -5.00m)
Measured QB19/2 (r = 0.65m z = -5.00m)
Measured QB20/2 (r = 1.65m z = -5.00m)
0.8
(1)
0.6
Plastic zone
e = 0.08 m
0.4
Borehole
0.2
(2)
-0.2
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Time [days]
Matrix behaviour
m
vol
M
m d p + s
=
1 + em pM + s
) = d (p
+s
Km
284
dMvol =
s
dpM
ds
dpM ds
+
=
+
KM K s
1 + eM* pM 1 + eM* s + patm
Bond behaviour
285
5.4
286
287
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
290
291
292
293