Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Thomas Nast celebrates the freeing of southern black slaves after the end of the Civil War. (Library of Congress)
of the United Statess escape from the autocratic forces of the Old
World, past and present. The ideological legacy of the Revolution
fused with the defining foreign events of his own lifetime to give
Lincoln a sharp appreciation of his countrys place in the world.
Those events above all, the independence movements led by
Simon Bolivar and his successors within Spains New World
empire, and the nationalist uprisings and movements of
democratic protest in Europe in 1848 were mediated for Lincoln
through political friends and acquaintances who knew them at
first hand.
Lincoln boasted no special expertise in respect of the internal
affairs of other nations, and they were rarely the theme of his
political discourse. He did, however, take a capacious view of the
foibles and aspirations of humankind. He was above all alert to
the truth revealed by the history of the world[,] that men of
ambition and talents will continue to spring up amongst us and
naturally seek the gratification of their ruling passion.
Constitutions could not restrain an Alexander, a Caesar, or a
Napoleon. Lincolns conception of universal traits of human
psychology and ambition was shaped and endorsed by his
reading of the Scriptures and Shakespeare. He learnt by heart the
introspective soliloquies of flawed monarchs like Lear and Richard
II, and of the usurping rulers Richard III, Macbeth and Claudius.
Shakespeares exploration of the perversion of power confirmed
its ubiquitous threat, whether in the Old World or the New.
Lincoln briefs General George B McClellan, at Antietam scene of the bloodiest single-day battle in American
history in 1862. (AFP/Getty)
Lincolns funeral procession moves through the streets of New York, 1865. His assassination was met with an
outpouring of grief that united disparate elements of society. (Hulton Archive/Getty Images)
Lincoln gave his nation the task of moral example. The nationalist
aspirations of other countries did not justify American
intervention. As one of the drafters in 1852 of Resolutions on
Behalf of Hungarian Freedom, Lincoln deemed Lajos Kossuths
cause an embodiment of American principles: it was the right of
any people, sufficiently numerous for national independence, to
throw off, to revolutionize, their existing form of government, and
to establish such other in its stead as they may choose. It was,
however, the duty of our government to neither foment, nor
assist, such revolutions in other governments. Non-intervention
was a sacred principle of the international law, to be breached
only to counter unwarrantable foreign interference by those
aiming to crush the cause of liberty. These were the cautious
views of a man who as a US congressman had recently
condemned the Mexican-American war of 184648 fought to
secure the massive expansion of the United States boundaries