Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Wiley-VCH 2014
69451 Weinheim, Germany
Supporting Information
Experimental
Chemicals: Iron (III) chloride (FeCl3, anhydrous, 99 %), manganese (II) chloride
(MnCl2, anhydrous), cobalt (II) chloride (CoCl2), 1-Octadecene (ODE, technical
grade, 90 %), Tetradecylphosphonic acid (TDPA, 97 %) and sodium oleate (NaOA,
82 % fatty acids (as oleic acid) basis, powder) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
and used as received.
Synthesis of amorphous MPO4 (M= Fe, Co, Mn) with ordered mesoporous structure.
To start, iron oleate (Fe(OA)3) was synthesized as precursor. The detailed procedure
is as follows: FeCl3 and NaOA were dissolved in 10 mL methanol separately and then
the FeCl3/methanol solution was slowly added into the NaOA/methanol solution and
sonicated for about 2 hours. The as-obtained precipitate was collected and dried in
vacuum oven overnight, and then re-dispersed in ODE (1 mM). Similarly, Mn(OA)2
and Co(OA)2 were synthesized by replacing FeCl3 with MnCl2 and CoCl2,
respectively. In a typical synthesis of FePO4, 0.5 mmol Fe(OA)3, and 139 mg TDPA
were added into 10 mL ODE solution in a flask. Then the mixed solution was heated
to 320 oC under Ar protection. During the heating process, the colour of the solution
changed from light brown to white and then to light brown again. After reaction, the
product was washed by hexane for 3-4 times and collected by centrifuging. The dried
product was then annealed under H2 atmosphere at 400 oC for 5 h. The synthesis of
Mn3(PO4)2 or Co3(PO4)2 was conducted in a similar procedure by using Co(OA)2 or
Mn(OA)2 as precursor instead of Fe(OA)3.
Note that the low annealing temperature is critical to maintain the ordered porous
structure. TEM image for FePO4 annealed at 450 oC under H2 atmosphere for 1 h
shows that the ordered porous structure was partly ruined (Figure S19). For the
sample annealed at 500 oC under H2 atmosphere for 3 h, small-angle XRD result
shown in Figure S20a indicates that the ordered porous structure was vanished.
Wide-angle XRD shown in Figure S20b indicates that the amorphous FePO4 sample
was converted to crystallized Fe4(P2O7)3 during the annealing process.
Characterization: The morphology of the samples was characterized with a
transmission electron microscope (TEM) system (JEOL, Model JEM-2010F)
operating at 200 kV. Crystal phase of samples were investigated using a Bruker D8
Advance diffractometer X-ray diffraction (XRD) at the 2 range of 2o to 80o with Cu
K radiation. Small angle X-ray scattering was tested by FACTs, School of Materials
Science and Engineering, NTU. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the
resulting composites was performed with an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer
(Kratos AXIS Ultra) using monochromatic Al K (1486.71 eV) X-ray radiation (15
kV and 10 mA); 160 eV pass energy was used for the survey scan, whereas 40 eV was
used for the high-resolution scan. The specific surface area was calculated by
Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) method using a nitrogen adsorption/desorption
(Quantachhrome Instruments, Autosorb AS-6B), and Differential scanning
S1
calorimetry (DSC, Q10) was carried out from room temperature to 320 oC at a heating
rate of 10 K min-1. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, Q500) was carried out from
room temperature to 700 oC at a heating rate of 10 K min-1 in air.
Electrochemical measurements: Electrochemical measurements were conducted at
room temperature, using two-electrode Swagelok cells with pure lithium metal as both
the counter electrode and the reference electrode. The working electrode consisted of
the active material (FePO4), a conductive agent (carbon black, Super P-Li) and a
polymer binder [poly(vinylidene difluoride), PVDF, Aldrich] in a 70:20:10 ratio (by
weight). The electrolyte consisted of 1.0 M LiPF6 in a 50:50 wt:wt solution of
ethylene carbonate and diethyl carbonate. The cell was assembled in an Ar-filled
glovebox with moisture and oxygen concentrations of <1.0 ppm. The cycling tests
were performed with a NEWARE battery tester at different C-rate with a voltage
window of 2-4 V.
Supplementary Figures
Figure S1. XPS spectra of the FePO4: (a) Fe 2p and (b) P 2p.
S2
Figure S2. XPS spectra of the FePO4: (a) O 1s and (b) C 1s.
Intensity (a.u.)
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
S3
Intensity (a.u.)
20
30
40
50
2(degree)
60
70
Figure S5. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption curves for the FePO4 flakes with ordered
mesoporous structure. Inset: Pore size distribution analyzed by the BJH model.
S4
Figure S6. XPS spectra of (a) Mn2p, (b) P2p and (c) O1s for mesoporous Mn3(PO4)2.
Figure S7. XPS spectra of (a) Co2p, (b) P2p and (c) O1s for mesoporous Co3(PO4)2.
S5
S6
S7
Figure S10. AFM and height profile for a typical Mn3(PO4)2 nanoflake.
Figure S11. AFM and height profile for a typical Co3(PO4)2 nanoflake.
S8
Intensity (a.u.)
30
40
50
2(degree)
60
70
Intensity (a.u.)
20
30
40
50
2(degree)
60
70
Figure S14. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption curves for the Mn3(PO4)2 with ordered
mesoporous structure. Inset: pore size distribution analyzed by the BJH model.
Figure S15. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption curves for the Co3(PO4)2 with ordered
mesoporous structure. Inset: pore size distribution analyzed by the BJH model.
S10
4.0
st
1 charge
Voltage (V)
3.5
3.0
st
1 Discharge
2.5
2.0
0.1C
0.5C 0.2C
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Capacity (mAh/g)
Figure S16. The initial galvanostatic charge-discharge voltage profiles for
mesoporous FePO4 nanoflakes at different c rates.
Figure S17. TEM image of FePO4 flakes after the cycling test at 0.1 C for 100 cycles,
showing the ordered mesoporous structures were preserved.
S11
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Temperature ( C)
Figure S18. DSC results showing the transition of precursors during the heating
process.
S12
Figure S20. (a) Small-angle and (b) wide-angle XRD patterns of Fe4(P2O7)3 annealed
under H2 at 500 oC for 3 h.
S13